Minority status and voter dilution

To wet your whistle.

Click to access dilution.pdf

Explains why they screech in excitement or sob with crocodile tears about everything demographic. It’s just vote-rigging. Bringing in fake voters (not actually with any birth right to decide the outgroup’s infrastructure and historical matters*) is comparable to a false military (terrorists, importing terrorists is also treason) since it’s the two ways to gain power – the status (political positions, MP, PM, POTUS, AG) and the might (enforcement with force -or else- and violence and little considered but critical intimidation i.e. common example, Western girls scared to wear more feminine AND Western clothing in multicultural areas, who has the balls to do that study?). [has to be both for clear signal value]

Political correctness is the tyranny of cultural intimidation.

*e.g. if they wouldn’t go to the draft, they have no opinion on the draft or the possibility of war. They’d be forced though. Playing victim doesn’t mean acting like an hysterical woman come draft time would work. I’d go to any version of the draft I’d be physically capable of so weak men have no excuse. I heard it described thusly: Do you wait for them to stab you warm in your bed hiding under a blanket or meet death like a man? ‘Like a man’ there referring to physical courage, what modern men sorely lack as they ‘work on’ abs and chest waxes and spray tans. The Hysterical Left can’t expect to always get rescued by the Honourable Loser Right. Actually, a smart general puts the weaker men on the front line knowing they’re A useless (I’d like to see a study on male health status markers for military purposes and IQ**) and B will get picked off anyway… this isn’t mean, and actually less sexist, since it’s good for the war effort*** and the overall fitness of Men as a category. If you spare the feeble men like prize inbred birds in a climate controlled room, as in WW1, you… should look up all the stupid socialist bullshit that got in shortly thereafter. Weak men make weak voting decisions. The best men died on the field, literally. Older and smaller wars, prior to the World ones, were highly eugenic for the male genome and the nomination system of medals for valour etc. reflect this incentive structure. They don’t hand out medals for a good pregnancy because surviving that condition is very random, no precise behaviours really change the outcome and it can have nothing to do with fitness e.g. sepsis****. Military medals handed out all the time make no sense, that’s the arrogance, and medals for mothers only make sense for a high number AND quality of children. We give children (pre-teen and under) medals when logically it should go to the family and strengthen that unit.

**This study is interesting and verging closer but I’ll add it separately.

***A statistic is quantitative whereas the genome is qualitative. If you had a binary choice between your country losing an inferior quality specimen (we are animals) and a far, far better one of its kind, who would you rather help with the rebuilding effort after the war? It’s like weeding a garden, this is so obvious.

****The future is bound to suck with antibiotic resistance AND escalating non-European population, there will be a pandemic. At some point. Mathematical inevitability.

The politicians don’t want the immigrants to know: A passport is a license to draft.

That’s literally what it is, legally, what it’s always been and why they became a big deal in WW2. In the event of a war while abroad, you could be identified with your country of military subscription. I’d love to see a Freedom of Information request on this, what a passport legally enshrines as a duty to the holder. It’s an international symbol of citizenship so burning it won’t make a bit of difference, you agreed and signed over XYZ. Why else would you sign your own passport? You must ensure the person crossing your border is signed on as a friend/ally and not a current enemy (military invasion). Why do passport inspectors ask why you’re there, for legal reasons?

Argh! I give up explaining this point.

The census is about food security, part of national security. Older ones were all about farms.

Back to voter dilution related “problems.”

It’s insane we have foreign nationals who think a passport is something they’ll never need to repay. It isn’t like a blank cheque, the hand-rubbing politicians see you as currency, you as a person. It’s a legal document binding you to the fate of a country, including its national debt, so to ruin that country or prefer your real “home” in policy decisions won’t actually work out for them? Just saying.

Sinking a ship you’re on and celebrating because you hated the captain.

If I’m a bitch, my name is foresight.

It’s a trifecta of stupidity. Citizenship is a noose, and you want dual?
[Actually, why don’t dual citizens pay twice the taxes? No, that would be fair, wouldn’t it? Can’t have that. ‘Fair’ is racist. nb Logically, they get twice the citizenry benefits and effectively pay half the tax for same. The politicians sell pig-shit thick celebrities on dual citizenships by appealing to their ego, which tells you everything you need to know.]

Pissing off the people who helped you (1) with a more advanced military (2) and higher native IQ (3)?

I foresee this ending well… how will we go after them for their share of the debts?

[inc. odious debt, hours of fun on that one]

Libertarians are stupid because they assume immigrants have common sense and act in their own and their home’s best interests. Haha no.

And the people who think being nice to the outgroup means that group will treat them any better or more stupidly, make them leader of the foreigners?! (See Labour leader contention for that last, no they won’t accept a foreign leader either. If Labour wants to be the ethnic party, it cannot have a white leader any more).

You know the show about dragons. That’s more plausible. This would never happen.

They’d rape her to death in about a day. This is medically possible.

No, your skin is your uniform whether you accept it or not, if you research their cultural psychology, even within the group itself they have caste systems. Multiple. And whitey is on the bottom of that scale too. History doesn’t change because you smiled at someone.

WW1 was the photo war, WW2 was the film. What’s the medium of WW3, memes?

The legal serfs

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/content/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

“The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.”

“We, the British people have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence… but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it… we do not.”

The Left’s death spiral

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11913282/The-Left-has-become-locked-in-a-death-spiral.html

They’ve gone back to their roots.

But this isn’t actually Labour. It would be tempting to think, but this is actually the UAF. The henchman of Labour.

Subtle distinction, but we must name the enemy of the People. They’ve already turned to the angriest, most Brownshirt faction to get what they want, as if this isn’t the 21st century, so the Left is well and truly eating itself. Those people are on par with SJWs as a destructive force, bringing them onto anything will damage you by proximity.

If they wanted better polling, they should serve the People, rather than lecture down and call the problems they caused imaginary (EU/immigration is the big one). Campaigning to leave the EU is the only thing that could save them at this point, and distinguish them from the splinter Left parties (Lib Dems and Greens).

But they won’t.

Thank G_d.

This aims to be a neat summary. Neat explanations are frequently superior.

Why I think the MRA/Angry MGTOW bitches will ultimately fail

Spectacularly. 

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

I’ve been asked this and it’s a fair question, this’ll be the one time I address the topic so I can leave it alone. To fail. On its own. Some joke about the entropy of sexual frustration.

What unites the two groups?

Condition 1:

“society is unfair!”

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

Life is unfair but go on.
Condition 2.  As I put it earlier:

wah wah wah Matriarchy is keeping me down”

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

Passive and unmanly but I’ll roll with that as premise.
The writing will be clunky, probably.

Why does modern society hate men?
Men fight the Government.

Think on that for a bit and come back.

Men don’t ask for things like women. Men overthrow, men topple, men destroy and war. They don’t need you for war anymore. What do they need you for, that they can’t get elsewhere?
If you are not willing to do those things, give your life to a cause, you are not a man and what you are defending is a luxury of the First World rather than a right. If you can live without it, it isn’t a right.
This is the point where they get anecdotal and apply injustice/victim mentality to areas of life that do not and will never apply to them e.g. the old canard, marriage is evil but I’m never getting married or women are dumb bitches I don’t need them why don’t they like me or my personal favourite I don’t need children where is my pension. 

Quick test: do they read the Victim Bible called The Guardian? If so, Pass Go and fuck yourself.

Let’s take the feminist metaphor that they want to use, to make the Government fuck men over further, but these guys keep agreeing with for suicidally stupid reasons: the Gender War. Let’s buy into their frame further.
Life isn’t a movie, it doesn’t matter which side is ‘right’, it is made by who has the biggest bastard on their team.
In this case, the Government. Who literally hold all the cards, and write all the laws, and hold all the guns (UK edition).

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

So what are you gonna do?
What can you do?
Sweet FA.

Government will crush the bitchy MGTOW and MRA agenda.
The equality paradigm (that isn’t fair! that’s discrimination bc I’m a man!) requires victims. The physically stronger sex cannot take a dive and fake an injury, this isn’t football. It doesn’t work. It will never work, whining delta, gamma and omega males cannot speak for their stronger counterparts, as feminists cannot speak for normal women. It’s called History. History is the proof men are not the weaker sex. Yet they keep going. At this point it’s embarrassing.

This isn’t all good for women and many women do not support the actions of Government, as many men don’t either (one of the issues with democracy, check out neoreaction some time folks).

The women who do (feminists) make a grievous error.
Women think Government will protect them. When things happen, SHTF, which do they need?
The sociopathic pen-pushers or men, in the street?
Yet they stab their guardians in the back and with crimson hands say “what happened?”. You became a concubine for the system. You are the whore for Babylon. That’s what happened. No wonder the men are doubtful. Distrustful. Some are just as bad though, and deserve no moral high horse, they deserve an ass. They don’t object to female parasitism, as long as they get a good, long suck off the State teat too. So it isn’t about sex. Sex doesn’t divide us. It’s about politics, it’s r/K. The fake MGTOW are the r-selected and want the world to improve around them, the real are K and want to improve themselves.
They want all the goodies too, to be ‘equal’ with feminists, with none of the responsibility too. Like feminists. They want a wife, all the cooking, sex, affection, kids but with none of the obligation, so they get a free hooker and call her a girlfriend. The girlfriend isn’t really giving it up for free, but he keeps up the pretense that it might get serious. To keep her, he must deceive her. He is the male equivalent of the feminist monster, who marries you to divorce you.

For the free hooker label;

What’s the point of a hooker? You enjoy their company. You leave when that stops.
What’s the point of a bf/gf, again?…

It used to be husband/wife auditions, there was a set timing to it, for courting. Now it’s a way for a man to claim a woman, like he owns her legally (wife), use up the best years of her life (youth) and ward other men off…. without commitment. Without any responsibility on his side.
And they complain about the societal decay, the fallout from this. Sure, there are many women on welfare, but how many of the fathers wanted to marry the mother of their children and financially support them? Are we all adults here? Do men deserve some moral exemption from a problem caused by two?
And you hear all these stories like “my gf cheated on me boo hoo” and it’s like, there’s no such thing. There are two relationship statuses: single or married. This is why men ‘cheat’ on their gf. They know this. What is the duty of a bf/gf? What? The idea is almost laughable.
There is no commitment that is not codified in law. She owed you nothing because you gave her nothing.

Counterexample: Same way a gf isn’t entitled to a proposal after X years. Or your money.

And which sex allowed it to become this way? Which sex allowed Patriarchy to decay and crumble?
Men. Men have only other men to blame.

Most of it, is that they wanted free sex. The primary motivation for men. Except nothing in life is free. So they had to give women excess power in exchange. If men wanted to reinstall a Patriarchy, all they would need to do is swear off sex with women. Then what? What can they do? What can they dangle as incentive, like training a dog? We all know they’ve got nothing, as a whore’s only value is sex. The MRA/angry MGTOW group are fighting against other men, sociopathic men running the system (and still blaming women somehow, which does make them misogynists). Do you think the sociopaths of the system really care what’s fair? What do you have to offer? You don’t have a pussy to whore out. You don’t have money. The tax system already took it. You’re already screwed.

Surprise! The Sisterhood lied to you to try and steal your prospects for themselves.

But go ahead, keep bitching about it. Like a girl. It makes you look really competent and adult.

Our elders are criticizing us because we see past their BS.

The rest of us are watching you and it’s quite funny. We lost sympathy when you started being stupid.
When it collapses, you’ll blame everybody but yourselves. That’s why it will fail.

Video: The Decline and Fall of the West & Biohistory

http://www.biohistory.org/biohistory-explained/

Biohistory is the study of the biological roots of human social behavior including the outbreak of wars, economic growth and decline, forms of government, and the rise and fall of civilizations. Biohistory proposes that changes in these areas reflect changes in the prevailing temperament of the population, which is in turn rooted in epigenetics.

I’d compare this to a systems theory level of knowledge.

Includes videos;

and one upcoming.

The 3 Profiteers

Financially: http://galeinnes.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/the-3-profiteers.html

I say this because the monetary system revolves around debt, but those who are greatly in debt will be financially terrorized by the digital life ahead, for the corporations on the other side will be able to assess your financial situation at all times, and applying for a loan will come at almost no cost to banks, for everything will become automated I assure you.

Culturally: http://28sherman.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/hypothesis-on-spreading-deviancy.html

Weimerica is a pretty weird place. Even the liberals who write “Family Guy” have caught on as after some latest gay event they had a character touch his son, and when his son stopped him, the father said, “I don’t know what’s right anymore”. How do things catch on though? How does S&M move from the dungeons, unspoken parlors and clubs to commonplace discussion amongst friends? Deviancy makes its way from the top of the status chain down with the help of the media….

Hey, they voted for more Government.
That ends in a totalitarian dystopic State.

No Noooooo are you kidding me wtf are you testing me satan

One means to keep the lumpenproles in line is to break their spirits before you take over.
Kill the culture.

We currently have a form of democratic fiat, will it hold without a mask of democracy?

Video: Peter Hitchens’ advice to UK Millennials Generation Y

[n.b. The sour-faced pillock in the background is liar Owen Jones, ‘son of Trotskyite union leader’, running joke, of whom someone said: “your critique is very telling, you simply see in this power network the people you don’t like”, refuses to stand for Parliament and evidently can’t stand someone he dislikes talking.]

They have been systematically betrayed and I see no end to it. There are so many issues which have been visited on this country by an elite of self-selecting, closed-minded people well-represented here this evening [typical BBC Question Time audiences] and largely incompetent as well, which have done enormous damage to our way of life. So for instance;

Who now has anything to say about the deindustrialization of this country and the destruction of manufacturing jobs under the Thatcher government? Who can reverse it? Who can do anything about it?

Who will say anything on this panel about the catastrophe of mass immigration which has changed this country irrevocably into somewhere completely different from what it was? They won’t talk about it. They won’t talk seriously about the immense problems of crime and disorder which affect millions of people in their homes and leave them utterly vulnerable to kinds of unpleasantness and violence and menace which they never used to have to undergo. And there is no sense whatsoever that there will be any reform of the criminal justice system or any attempt to put it right again.

These are just some of the subjects which this elite constantly constantly refuse to discuss. Why? Because they themselves have an ideology, they themselves have an ideology of metropolitan bourgeoisie bohemians, they despise most people outside of the –

Notice where he was going when the interruption occured? Whom do they despise? Common, working class white people.

[Professional prick Owen Jones interrupts “are you a man of the people”?] At least he is a man, Owen (who btw, has a tumblr, like a 13yo girl.)

I’m no more a man of the people than you are Mr Jones.

OJ: Well I don’t claim to be. {lie, his career is based on that dream, he IS The Establishment}

These are the things they will not do anything about, they will not talk about because they themselves benefit. [like book sales?] They themselves benefit from many of things which do immense damage, they’ve benefited from globalization, they’ve benefited from mass immigration –

Owen Jones interrupts AGAIN like a rabid bitch who cannot help himself and wait his turn: You talk about mass immigration, let’s talk about immigrants coming over here propping up our NHS treating us when we’re ill [inadvertently proving Hitchens’ point by interrupting and changing the subject].

They’re not affected, their children don’t go to bog-standard comprehensive schools, they’re not affected by it, they’re not affected by crime, yes I do know (….unclear speech) because I know what they do. All the time. They will not discuss these things, they will not do anything about them, they ignore what you say.

And do you think that at General Election time you can do something about it? No.

The people who stand before you at General Election time for the political parties are people who have been pre-selected, you have no control. If I stood for Parliament, or if he stood, from our positions which are quite popular, the party machines would erase us.

The immense amounts of money they’re capable of spending, the enormous access they have to the broadcasting organisations, which we don’t have, most of the time, would make it impossible [they try to interrupt yet again] for anyone outside the (main parties) to come in.

Host: The question was what would you say to people who feel like you clearly do …. what would you say to them about how to change things?

My advice to anyone young enough to do so is to emigrate before it’s too late.

And some bitch on the panel heckles “Oh for God’s sake.” Logical rebuttal there.

I’ve done my research and everywhere else is worse. Long term. Culturally doomed. Batton down the hatches.