The future American

Deport them all or say bye to your country.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/668106376/generation-z-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-yet

A “bare majority,” the report notes, of 52 percent are non-Hispanic white, compared to 61 percent of millennials in 2002 when they were in the same age range.

There’s much more Hispanic and Asian presence among the nation’s children and youth today,” says Richard Fry, a senior research at Pew who co-authored the report with Kim Parker.

I hear the locust of the apocalypse. It smells like soy sauce.

Nearly half of post-Millennials are racial or ethnic minorities

Assuming 100% of them were “Christian”, your cultural, political and genetic futures are still dead.

CHINO is multicultural Christianity, and it’s bullshit. An Italian Christian is not an English Christian is not a Syrian Christian is not a Jamaican Christian is not a Chink Christian. That’s multiculturalism via the back door.

Chromosomes make culture, as HBD study proves.

i.e. Asians will never be honorary whites.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894685/

With obvious consequence:

Jesus said to spread the Word, not mix genetics. God split the languages and the peoples on PURPOSE.

Population data

“You’re not being replaced!”

https://countrydigest.org/uk-population/

The rate of population growth in the UK has increased in recent years. In 2015 the population increased by 513,000 people (0.8%).

Population increases come from immigration and natural growth (the number of births minus the number of deaths. The total number of immigrants coming into the UK is offset by the number of people who emigrate from the United Kingdom each year (see British people abroad below) to reach a final population growth total for the year.

No, total immigration doesn’t minus, net is minus. Why not report total?

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/statistics-net-migration-statistics

2018: net immigration 258

TOTAL 2018: 602

Boomers should be exit taxed heavily for escaping the mess they created.

back to top

About one third of the UK population increase in recent years is a result of natural population growth – where the number of people being born in the UK is higher than the number of people dying every year. The remaining two thirds of the population increase is the result of net immigration into the United Kingdom.

About half of the people coming to the UK in 2015 were from the European Union. Recent data indicates that there are approximately 3 million EU citizens living and working in the UK. This equates to 5% of the UK population. The other half came from non-EU countries.

That’s …6 million.

+10%-ish.

If you have another country’s passport, you shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

And that’s just official, not illegal.

And new, not second+ generations in the multicultural colonies.

Immigration is a contentious topic in the UK, with many people believing that it is too high.

Natives.

Because of this immigration was one of the most important topics during the recent referendum about whether the UK should remain in or leave the European Union (often referred to as the Brexit referendum.

8 years ago:

The office for National statistics records data on ethnicity in each census. In 2011 it reported that the largest ethnic group in the UK was White (87.17%), followed by Asian or Asian British (6.92%) and Black (3.01%).

There’s no such thing as “Asian British”, like there’s no such thing as a hyphenated American. You’re either American or not. Asia is not in Britain. Race/ethnicity is not citizenship.

2.0% Mixed

0.9% Other

Most white people in Britain are descended from a number of different ethnic groups, not all of which are indigenous to the British Isles.

non sequitur but nice way of saying ‘invaders’

and they’re not from different forensic groups at all, same race, same subrace/s

They were all THE SAME RACE.

This heritage reflects the history of the British Isles, which has been invaded on a number of occasions.

The black population in Britain has roots going back to the 15th and 16th centuries.

No, it doesn’t. That isn’t a root. Africa is a root.

Phylogenetic tree root of blacks is Africa.

The British Asian population also has a long history which began in the 17th century.

No. It began in Asia, where they belong.

Plus, that isn’t a long history, that’s a blip.

Diversity + Proximity = War

The 2011 census showed that Christianity remains the dominant religion in the UK. The number of people who reported that they were Christians in the UK was 37,583,962, which is 59.49% of the total population. The number of people who report that they are Christian fell by more than 12% between 2001 and 2011, from 71.58% in 2001.

Shame.

The next most common responses were either no religion (25.67%) or religion not stated (7.17%). The number of people who gave one of these answers increased from 23.18% in 2001 to 32.84% in 2011.

92.33% combined.

Jews 0.43%

Muslim 4.41%

Well, guess it was nice knowing them.

And this is outdated.

Islam is the second most commonly reported religion in the UK with 4.41% of the population.

49,808,000 English 1st language speakers.

546,000 Polish locusts.

273,000 Punjabi 3rd place.

Arab 7, French 8, Chinese 9.

Note: Indigenous languages such as Welsh and Scots do not feature on this list as they were more commonly reported as second languages.

As this chart from the ONS shows, the proportion of people in London whose first language is not English is far higher (around 20%) in London than it is in the rest of the country.

According to the 2011 census, the most commonly spoken non-indigenous language in the UK was Polish, with 546,000 native speakers in England and Wales – approximately 1% of the population.

From one nation, the locusts of Europe. The chavvy breeder scum of the white race.

And that’s just speakers, not other Poles. Because they’re all such nationalists and Poland is so great, right?

They hate immigrant invasion the MOST.

source: Americans who never lived with them.

If they’re so proud of Poland, could they fuck off back there?

If they’re defending the West, can they do it from Poland?

But diversity is our strength! At least low IQ places like Poland aren’t fucking over the country permanently…

A recent study by the OECD reported that the UK had the lowest literacy rate of any developed nation. It reported that around 20% of English 16-19 year olds have low literacy skills.

This is backed up by a report from the UK’s Literacy Trust, which explains that 16% of adults in England are “functionally illiterate”. This means that their literacy is below what is expected of the average 11 year old.

And they can vote. 1 in 6 illiterates.

Millions of them.

We call them Labour voters, the name is ironic.

They should be forced into a school for adults until up to speed. As long as it takes.

87 billion per year down the shitter. Because education works on genetic IQ…. right?

According to Eurostat, the United Kingdom is the fourth most densely populated country in the EU

At the time of the last census, in 2011, the population of Greater London was 8,173,941.

By 2015, Greater London’s population had increased to 8,673,713.

An extra half a million on record, (probably including emigrants, which it shouldn’t).

The UK’s ageing population puts increasing pressure on the country’s public services and economy.

MYTH Dead people don’t strain services.

Fertility rate in the UK has also fallen over the past 50 years, from 2.95 children per woman in 1965 to 1.82 children per woman in 2014.

Good, pre-WW levels. Sustainable, among ourselves.

This is below the replacement rate (2.33 children per woman across the world, but 2.0 children per woman in industrialised countries) but higher than the EU average fertility rate which in 2014 was just 1.58 children per woman.

If you don’t force men to marry, no kids.

We live in the marriage-free world.

But yes, EU and other socialism is literally dying.

And, finally, at the bottom of the pyramid we can see the effects of a dip in the UK’s birth rate during the early 21st century, followed by an boost in recent years.

Non-native births, discounted.

Race is not citizenship. A passport entitles you to nothing from the outgroup.

Loan forgiveness or demographic death

Fraudulent products aren’t valid anyway. Just sue the schools for mis-sold goods.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/

If you could vote away your future to benefit elderly lazy rich assholes who hate you while keeping their trust fund brats in coke or dissolve the academic institutions’ fraud that’s ruined your once prosperous society’s life and possibility to reproduce, which would you pick?

(((Who))) owns these young plantation workers? Who bought their debt?

Where are the names?

Stopping them from having savings, being minimalists etc etc.?

Answer d.

Look at your chains.

Credit: Master Brew

Do you want your people to be indentured servants to con artists who practiced decades-long trickery?

Why turn a blind eye to this socialism? Do you really think the product has gained hundreds of percent in value?

Free whitey.

Non-white births down in America

The sky isn’t falling you fecking idjits.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

[Marriage is also a factor. Unmarried women don’t want a baby.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby ]

I am shook. Women don’t wanna be lumbered with the baby of a man who doesn’t care enough to be a husband and father?* They aren’t attracted to feckless manchilds?

Those bitches!

“That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites”

FEATURE

NOT. A. BUG.

Chart for the lazy people:

Look at the actual data before whining.

That’s called a selection pressure, children.

Men won’t marry? Women won’t breed.

Who wins? [women, their relatives breed]

But the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic fertility has only declined from 1.95 births per woman to 1.72, yielding about 2.3 million missing births. Solidly half of the missing kids over the last decade would have been born to Hispanic mothers, despite the fact that Hispanics only make up about a quarter of fertility-age women.

Thus, in racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist”

Telling them to be breeding sows isn’t?

Hey, what exactly are they claiming these women should do?

Get back in the maternity ward? Pump out future Dem voters?

*If you really “care” (virtue signal) about Western birth rates, Chicken Littles of the internet, ask MGTOW why they’re complaining about the birth rate but not marrying. You don’t get to complain if you’re causing the ‘problem’.

https://www.rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/

https://nypost.com/2017/09/02/cheap-sex-is-making-men-give-up-on-marriage/

A problem you cause is a CHOICE.

[GDP will go up in a generation with fewer lower IQ drains on its system.]

Other data article:

For the lazy:

“That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.”

Marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

HALF OR MORE.

Meanwhile, student loans must be written off if you care about IQ.

“It’s possible that debt may also reduce fertility, independently of marriage. Some studies do show that student debt has a strong effect on delaying fertility. The economic rationale is simple: having and raising children costs money, and student debt gobbles up a share of income right off the top of the budget. Crucially, even income-based repayment doesn’t fix this, as it resets with higher incomes: a debtor can’t earn their way out. As income rises, so do debt payments. At some high threshold, of course, the debtor can exceed the required payments and can advance the date of final repayment, but the point is that student loans, no matter how they are structured, divert money that might have gone towards planning for a child. It’s even possible that student loans delay marriage because they cause debtors to change their childbearing anticipations: maybe debtors realize they won’t be able to afford a child for a long time, and so they postpone marriage until they are (financially) ready for a child.”

Men can’t afford to marry, have kids unless loans are much lower.

Loan control would be a conservative policy, boosting high IQ fertility.

More babies being born are born to high IQ, educated parents.

Again, actual data.

“Finances, and student debt, specifically, aren’t the only reason for delayed marriage. Most unmarried people who want to get married say either that they are too young and unready for marriage, or else they haven’t found the right person. It may be that part of the problem is the decline in “marriageable men.” At the metro area level, the imbalance in sex ratios can sometimes be enormous.”

“The simple fact of the matter is that marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

ACTUAL. DATA.

Women want to have kids, it’s the mens’ fault.

“Combined, it turns out that a combination of marital status, age, and fertility ideals is a pretty good predictor of individual-level fertility. In other words, marital status serves as a circuit-breaker on fertility aims: married people get close to achieving their aims, while never-married people generally don’t.”
“But one vital driver of birth rates is marriage. And as long as the average age of first marriage rises and the number of prime childbearing years the average woman spends married falls, we can expect to see fertility linger at low levels. Therefore, any policy supporting childbirth—however generous it may be—that does not also somehow impact marriage trends is unlikely to boost long-term fertility.”

It isn’t women’s fault they won’t man up.

The data is loud and clear.

White bachelor men are cucking themselves.

Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’.

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

https://www.cement.org/docs/default-source/fc_concrete_technology/durability/is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

Malthus was right

Specifically:

The superior power of population cannot be checked without producing misery or vice.

Almost like maths is always eventually right.
You can’t get blood out of a stone. Communists and socialists eventually run out of tax money, like a car can coast on fumes but doesn’t work with them from scratch.
You can’t only force people to work so many hours.
Pensions hasten the decline, you cannot live off of other people’s children – they simply won’t have those children.

Why lose in that investment?

So now you all lose thanks to bandwagon effect, tragedy of the commons.
Now you all must work til you drop.

https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/asia/article/2180421/worse-japan-how-chinas-looming-demographic-crisis-will

“This means that the next-generation population in this region is only a quarter the size of the last generation. Northeast China has also been hardest hit economically. Similarly, in the rest of China, the fertility rate and economy may continue to decline.”

Why can’t the old people get off their arse?

I’ve never heard a good reason. If they’re so sprightly to be really physically active and young people won’t get the same, that’s age based theft.

The filial piety extremes of Asia will kill it.
If grandma doesn’t want to work for 3/4 of her life, that productivity has to come out of her children, who have fewer grandchildren, who may, given the burden of the parents in addition, never have children themselves.

It’s a slow natural selection. The selfish perish.

You also see this in the West.

Boomers aborted children or never conceived. Full pensions, the works.
Gen X had fewer children, tons of economic problems (immigrations, dot com bubble, housing mini bubble).
Gen Y came into adulthood with the small crash of 08 and will never retire, it’s mathematically impossible, the cupboard is bare.

Where’s the intergenerational transfer?

It should be going from old to young but not only has social contract been ignored but reversed, the spoiled of the Boomers got the BEST of everything at EVERY age, including old age. They’re dying and taking it with them, stolen from their parents who earned it in WW2 and their children/grandchildren especially.

The lowest investment generation of all time, if you look how much they paid into social security against how much they take out alone. The stupid little antifa tarts, male/female, are all “you go girl” not realising the gravy train will be empty by the time they qualify. Two years before death at 92.

The immigrant families (r-types) will be hit harder – dozens of uncle/aunts and so many great-somethings all creaking along into absurdly old age. I think the kids will emigrate to avoid paying for their family at First World cost.

If they’re smart, leaving the leeches behind.

There are plenty of abusive relationships trying to hide as filial piety. Piety isn’t about money, it’s dignity. There’s no dignity in leeching off your kids then browbeating them about “WHERE MY GRANDKIDS!” while slapping them with a shoe because that’s normal in the 3rd world you didn’t want to raise them in. Piety goes both ways. If you can’t loan from them under the same terms, without getting tons of verbal slack, it’s abusive.

I’ve already seen plenty of Asians swear off having kids. They just give up.

They work too hard for too little final money. Sometimes the relatives actually “tax” them (I mean like 60% if you sit down and add it up) or insist they take expensive trips to see relatives. If that was so fucking important, why did you leave? Why go thousands of miles?

Back to Asians in general but this applies to Western law/maths too.

Here’s how it works.

A state pension is subsistence, plenty of people falsely believe 1. they’re legally entitled to a pension (no, it is NOT a human right, tell the socialists) and 2. they deserve to live like kings off it (blatantly impossible, you can’t earn more not working plus inflation eating its value away). Pension investment is keeping the stock market alive and the housing bubble up (no pressure to sell) as well as savings down because they fucked over the mechanism to increase the savings rate with their shitty or non-investments.
Some have the temerity to complain why they can’t find a good savings account.
They made this market, not the avocado toast crowd.
Imagine being so petty you complain your grandchildren eat decent food.

The size of China’s labour force is rapidly declining, while its elderly population numbers are increasing dramatically. In 2015, China had 6.9 workers aged 20-64 supporting one senior citizen aged 65 or above (most women retire in their 50s) and there is already a social security shortfall. The ratio will continue to decline, to 3.6 workers in 2030 and 1.7 in 2050. No social security net, no family security and a pensions crisis will evolve into a humanitarian catastrophe. As women live six to seven years longer than men on average (and are usually a few years younger than their husbands), they will be the main victims of population control.”

Victims??? You mean parasites.

Retiring in your 50s is fraud, for most jobs. Fuck you.

Allowing emigration is killing them faster.

Communist planning at its finest.

Let’s punish the worker and expect results.

“In the past, young China tried to catch up with middle-aged America, and the economic gap shrank. In the future, the economic gap between elderly China and middle-aged US will again widen.”

R-selection kills.

Your basic function in a family unit is to replace yourselves (extra children in case of illness too).
If you cannot replace yourself with no external pressure like tons of immigrants taking up housing/schools, then you have failed as a nation. At least the West doesn’t pretend to like families.

Europe’s low population density will SAVE IT.

Avoiding famine is why. K-selection is good for times of resource constriction.

They tried to produce an uber-K environment with one child – but low investment (Princess syndrome). Ks don’t raise narcissists.

“From this, we can say that the US economy will not be overtaken by China but, rather, by India. China’s economic vitality will continue to decline, which will have a disastrous impact on the global economy.”

How will they blame race, I’m waiting.
So much for the claimed superior IQ to America, huh?

India’s national IQ is too low to lead a tango line and old diseases are coming back because they brush their teeth in shit water, don’t hold out hope.

Hygiene is the requirement of a leading economy.

https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/united-states/article/2180471/how-badly-chinas-economy-doing-look-behind

“There are verbal reports of Chinese academics calculating China’s 2018 economic growth at as low as 1.5 per cent, rather than the official 6.5 per cent. That seems too low to me but when I tested it among my China-based investment management buddies, it caused little surprise. After all, we have seen substantial declines in many of China’s economic indicators in the past year. That slow pace would put China behind the US, which overstimulated its own economy through big tax breaks.”

“One problem with the authorities holding on to a wishful 6 per cent GDP growth figure is that it gives us no real indication of when the economy may recover.”

Second of never? You voted for socialism, you’ll end up worse than Greece.

Again, pensions tanking them.

https://www.businessinsider.com/greece-germany-pensions-2010-4

It killed Rome, it’s killing you.

Tell the lazy POS to earn their “dotage” and you might do better.

https://armstrongeconomics.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/armstrongeconomics-rome-unfunded-pensions-051811.pdf

“China is likely to stimulate its economy by cutting interest rates, further slashing banks’ reserve requirements and asking state-controlled banks to lend more.”

That works so well everywhere else.

Maybe if China pulls a magic wand with a Communist sickle out their backside, they can recover.

https://www.photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html

Lynn IQ data:

China – 100, when tested,

UK- 100,

US – 98,

Israel – 95,

Venezuela and Nigeria – 84,

India – 82.

Don’t lie to me.

The GDP of Venezuela will do better than India, in the long run.

Relevant: http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/05/19/myth-20th-century-episode-19-malthus-discontents-population-policy/

Fund your replacement says Bill Gates

Nice try, I posted about this yeeears ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/sep/18/the-african-youth-boom-whats-worrying-bill-gates

“What worries Bill Gates most?”

The orange snazzy number with his name on it?

“The booming population of Africa looms over his foundation’s latest global survey.”

Ah, of course. The old reliable.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/09/11/comic-the-routine/

“By the end of this century there will be 4 billion more people on Earth –”

no there won’t, you know there won’t, but you need to rob the people from the present while they’re still alive

“and 3 billion of these extra souls will be born in Africa. The challenge, he says”

what reverse psychology?

and this isn’t our problem, it’s theirs

they have governments to solve their problems

white people should leave/stay out of it

“is that “Africa must almost quadruple its agricultural productivity to feed itself. That’s very daunting.””
War and famine. It can’t even handle its current or former populations, this is heavily IQ and also the laziness of refusing to farm.
If Africans want to escape Bill Gates, they should be allowed to. They’re frightened of him.

So aborting them would be genocide but not white people?

Bet your life on it?