UN population paper to 2300

I think I’ve posted this before and I know I’ve recently spotlighted the dying demographic nations like Poland (lowest fertility rate in the EU).

But let’s look again and wonder how such steep changes could happen, shall we?

“Population growth in Eastern Europe is now negative, and Southern Europe is projected to join it with zero growth around 2005.

Western and Northern Europe, in contrast, are expected to maintain positive growth until around 2025 and 2040, respectively (figure 36). Declines in growth not only come earlier but are also much sharper in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Western and Northern Europe. Were international migration eliminated, zero growth in Western and Northern Europe would come instead much earlier, around 2005. With no migration, the growth trajectories for Western, Northern, and Southern Europe would still be roughly similar but would be pegged at a lower level, but the growth trajectory for Eastern Europe would be little changed. Looking beyond 2050, one sees each region return gradually to zero or slightly positive growth.”

But by all means think voting and anti-marriage propaganda will help…. It’s like demographic Santa. Babies can be wished into existence! What incentives?
Also, EE, this is why you don’t traffic and pimp out your nubile young women to rich Arabs and STD-ridden tourists. You ate the demographic seed crop. If you continue to betray your women (fact: most white people are women) then you deserve to die out. Misogyny (as with misandry) are anti-natal. Figure 35 shows the wages of sin is death i.e. treason = extinction. The MRA/MGTOW anti-natal propaganda is largely the rejected gamma trying to genetically murder those above him (the coward’s way, Wormtongue) by fish bicycle logic. Surely you’re smarter than that? SJWs perform the same gamma/spiteful mutant function among women.

The United Kingdom dominates Northern Europe demographically, with 64 per cent of regional population. Its growth trajectory is about 0.1 points higher than that for Northern Europe as a whole. The region also includes three small Baltic countries with economies in transition: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Their growth trajectories are radically different, being even more negative than that for Eastern Europe. The remaining European countries with economies in transition are all in Eastern Europe, except for Albania and the successor states to Yugoslavia, which are in Southern Europe. However, growth in Albania and the former Yugoslav republics is not that different from, and actually slightly higher than, growth in Southern Europe as a whole. Southern Europe is dominated by Italy and Spain, whose projected slow growth is reflected in the regional trajectory.”

Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. Reprobate mind? Sexually decadent cultures?

“Projected fertility trends are consistent with the growth trends. Some initial fertility decline further below replacement is expected in this decade, except in Western Europe, where fertility is believed to have hit bottom in the early 1990s and has risen slightly since then (figure 38).” That’s Labour immigration policy.

Each region is then assumed to reach total fertility of 1.85 by 2045-2050, with Northern and Western Europe progressing along a higher trajectory than Southern and Eastern Europe. Within the following quarter century, fertility is then expected to rise further to replacement level, with Southern Europe lagging behind the other regions.”

Yet I find it hilarious that Eastern Europe is taking the most degenerate of white trash immigrants, the PUAs. They’ll soon learn it isn’t even race of the immigrant, it’s whether they’ll render your local population infertile with STDs and cause local disruption with their carousing. Like the Vikings, they’ll take your women. It’s the rule. And if the local women refuse, like Taharrush, they’ll be forced. I’d expect druggings to become commonplace (including alcohol spikings) whenever PUAs move into an area.

Sort your incitement to rape laws NOW. Protect your culture. Don’t become like NY or London. Do not let the sexual locusts eat your nubile seed crop. r-types emigrate.

“Fertility stays at current levels in the constant projection scenario, which leads to incredibly large numbers for world population. For the European population, however, it leads instead, in the long run, to startlingly low numbers. By 2300, Western, Southern, and Northern Europe would each have only 28-30 million people, and Eastern Europe
would have only 5 million.
The European Union,which has recently expanded to encompass 452-455 million people (according to 2000 or 2005 figures) would fall by 2300 to only 59 million.
About half the countries of Europe would lose 95 per cent or more of their population, and such countries as the Russian Federation and Italy would have only 1 per cent of their population left. Although one might entertain the possibility that fertility will never rise above current levels, the consequences appear sufficiently grotesque as to
make this seem improbable.”

95 per cent or more of their population

and party countries like Italy and the world’s strip club Russia:

only 1 per cent of their population left

“sufficiently grotesque” is code for effective genocide folks

Also: You don’t judge whether something is POSSIBLE by emotional appeal.

See, you don’t need to kill everyone, just most of them, to prevent a functioning economy, especially the young people, and if you can keep them bachelors so much the better, because white people need to marry first before they breed. Distractions include careerism, the gym and notch counting.

“These changes take a century. Quicker societal adjustments are necessary when demographic change is rapid in the short-run, though such demographic changes tend to be more difficult to predict. Table 9 shows the highest and lowest growth rates expected for each country in any period between 2000 and 2300. Most of the largest positive growth rates appear in 2000-2005, while fertility is still high in various countries. The largest negative growth rates appear close to 2050 or beyond 2100, when countries enter a period of below-replacement fertility. European countries tend to show slowest growth earlier, African countries later, except for some Southern African countries where slow growth appears around 2020-2030 because of HIV/AIDS.”

or a SARs bioweapon.

Yet the anti-natal channels on Youtube are the only kind exempt from the so-called ‘redpill’ ban hammer.

Makes ya think. Activates the almonds. Rustles my jimmies. I wonder (((why))). They hate white males and they’re telling them to nix their genome with the snip or race mixing. I wonder why those channels are up? Why are so many pick-up artists non-white? And yes, that includes the Jews. When do we get the AQ – the Asian Question of them inserting themselves into our culture and policies? Hello fellow hwyte male. Let them slice your balls.

That’s the Boomer fallout, the consequences of all the dysgenic policies, from abortion to the Pill to free love/hook-up/whoredom to Asian and African immigration/invasion. I know some of you didn’t vote for it, it still exists. I’ll be considered generationally along Trigglypuff so deal with it.

TABLE 8 is a sobering read.

e.g. Croatia, millions of population, -27 by 2100, maximum 0% change. Stop importing degenerates.

Israel 63M by 2100, curious. 70% + max change. Almost like they knew.

Poland -33M by 2100. By all means, let degenerates immigrate. Make it worse.

BY contrast, Somali 658 million. Not a typo.

Serbia, -26 million by 2100. Were the shekels worth it?

I’m sorry I base my opinions on data.

By comparison, so-called cucked Sweden minus 8 million by 2100.

So Eastern Europe is literally worse off than the Swedes. Nobody says anything. Controlled ops.

UK gains 10M, mostly non-Anglo, I’d wager. The native pop is suppressed by (economic) factors and anti-marriage propaganda.

America gains 53M, mostly mystery meat if you look at new births and white deaths. Thanks, Boomers.

Yemen gains 700M. Not a typo.

“In 2000-2005, 56 countries, out of 192, have total fertility of 4.0 or higher. By 2045-2050, the number will be zero. Instead, 139 countries will have total fertility under 2.0. Beyond 2050, however, the progression is not unilinear. The number of countries with fertility below 2.0 will fall, as more and more countries return to a replacement level just above 2.0. But fertility levels of 2.2 or higher are not expected to return.”

So Marxism of any kind (including precious socialists) will go the way of the dodo. The production simply won’t be there to leech from.

You read the rest. This century, the white man dies. If they endorsed anti-natal practices, it’s deserved. Revenge is mine, saith the LORD.

We need exogenic wombs, it seems. Because there won’t be enough fertile women to go around.

Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’. The neocolonialism as BPS explained, of buying up properties in another homeland (r-migration for resources).

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

Click to access is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

“China’s gonna rule the world!”

This is a long race.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/scary-statistic-chinas-debt-gdp-ratio-reached-257-percent-22824

Scary Statistic: China’s Debt to GDP Ratio Reached 257 Percent in 2017

O.K. Chiaboo.

https://chinapower.csis.org/aging-problem/

“China’s population is growing old at a faster rate than almost all other countries….”

http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/01/30/chapter-2-aging-in-the-u-s-and-other-countries-2010-to-2050/

B-b-b-but America’s population is aging!

Read the chart and tell me which continent is fucked.

http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/05/19/myth-20th-century-episode-19-malthus-discontents-population-policy/

“In particular, the U.S. population is projected to grow faster and age slower than the populations of its major economic partners in Europe and Asia. “

Now, who has the least young people? Read the chart.

Now read this one.

“Countries in Asia and the Middle East are also turning gray rapidly. The median age should increase by 16 years in South Korea, from 38 in 2010 to 53 in 2050.24 Double-digit increases are also expected in India, China, Indonesia, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt and Turkey. The median age in China, Iran and Turkey is younger than the U.S. at the moment but should become older by 2050.”

“Japan currently has the oldest population in the world, and the median age there is projected to increase from 45 in 2010 to 53 in 2050. South Korea is expected to catch up to Japan by 2050 as its median age also increases to 53 by mid-century. By then, the median age in Germany (51), Italy (50) and Spain (50) will not be far behind. China’s population, with a median age of 46 in 2050, is expected to be older than those in Russia, France and Britain by that date.”

Consider these percentages in light of total population (millions or billions).

It isn’t a question of IF the Chinese start eating each other (again), but when.

Double dependency in two generations.

Which continent, total populations considered, is the most fucked?

Oh but it might peak by 2070?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170621145126.htm

I don’t think they can wait that long. They aren’t sustainable now.

What does Bloomberg know?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-05/china-s-next-debt-bomb-is-an-aging-population

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2132236/chinas-ageing-population-creating-new-debt-crisis-beijing-pension

Cannibals

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/cannibalism-11222013104349.html

 [Then premier] Liu Shaoqi is reported to have said this to [then supreme leader] Mao Zedong: “When people start eating each other, it’ll be my name and yours that are written down.” We don’t know what discussion this referred to, nor what came after this remark…. At the time, I thought to myself at the time: “Cannibalism. Well that’s huge. And it has even come to the knowledge of Mao Zedong.” But I still had no basis [to believe it was true]. The [ruling Chinese] Communist Party is a very secretive organization.

But the head of the Anhui police department … wrote a report [during the 2000s] in which he said that [there had been] 1,289 cases of cannibalism reported in the province in 1960. That’s 1,289 cases. These were considered “special cases.” That’s the name they gave to cases of cannibalism.

Recently, I have received another article. It’s an official document that was sent for forwarding to an office in Gansu province. It’s a report written by an investigative team that was sent to the province…. It documents nearly 50 cases. Here it shows you the time, and the rural work unit the people belonged to, and the names of those involved, and who it was that they ate, and how they ate them.

Here’s one: “Ma Waiyou, of Maiji commune, Xinmin village. Status: common peasant. He ate Chen Zaxi. Relationship: spouse. He ate his own wife. He dug up her body and cooked it.”

A cruel race.

Here’s another: “Yang Wenyi and Yuan Shuying of Houxiyan village together with … eight people in total, dug up the body of a child, cooked and ate it.”

Here’s another, at the Xihe commune. A person called Liu Chuan. “They killed him and ate him….”

This is a secret report carried out by the Chinese Communist Party itself…. Mao Zedong knew about this…. Many more reports will come out like this, when those files are finally opened. This was an era of cannibalism.

Q: So there are official accounts?

A: There’s one … about a labor camp in Gansu … where there were more than 3,000 “rightists.” Now some prisoners in labor camp get special privileges. They might get extra grain, or they might be allowed visits from their relatives, things like that. This is in return for special jobs they do. There are three people here, named. Wei Changhai. Rightist. His job? To sell dead bodies.

When I was in labor camp, there was a guy like that. He drove the truck out every day to sell dead bodies. Sometimes I went with him. They all had enough grain to eat, those guys. He looked pretty healthy…. They were so strong, not like us who looked like we might keel over any minute. We asked our brigade leader why this was, and he said, “I’ll show you something.” He took us to the graveyard, which was a huge area of wasteland where they would dig pits, throw in the bodies, and then cover them up again.

It was a ghastly chaos. One would have an arm broken, another a leg missing, one would be naked. He dug one up and said “Look!” The body’s clothing was ripped open and their chest had been cut open too. There was no flesh on the body’s bones. It was skin on a frame of bone. You couldn’t eat the flesh on those bodies because there was nothing on them. But when we looked inside, we saw that the heart, liver, and lungs were gone.

Communism. Greed is a deadly sin.

No ring, no baby!

https://www.mercatornet.com/demography/view/no-ring-no-baby/21166

If you want to increase fertility, this comes first.

I have pushed this basic fact time and time and time again.

There’s even a nursery rhyme about it!

First comes love, then comes marriage

THEN comes baby!

“America’s birth rate is falling far below what is needed to maintain economic growth

Hey, Boomers and Gen X (and now Gens Y/Z) wanted sex without the reproduction part.

So they also voted with their… feet…. to pay for their own retirements and so forth, not to expect their ghost babies to pay it for them.

A large part of the decline in birth rates can be directly accounted for by a factor unlikely to be influenced by those birth-targeted incentives: marriage. That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.

Good women don’t want to become single mothers. That’s a good thing.

Deadbeats and would-be deadbeats are being rejected on that basis. Excellent!

This is great for society.

The men expecting they can cash out by getting kids but horrendously depriving them of a good setting for a suitable upbringing need an ear-pull from their elders.

It’s confusing how they’d think having kids is less serious than marriage. I mean stupid.

Oh look, women aren’t terrible Lilith figures or Medusas trying to use you for your sperm!

They want the man it’s attached to to invest!

Broody women want a husband, what a shocker.

By fixing age-specific marital status to 2001 or 2008 levels, we can model a counterfactual scenario of what fertility might have been had people gotten married and formed families at the same rate as formerly.

Let alone if the economy were good.

Essentially all of the decline in fertility since 2001 can be explained by changes in the marital composition of the population. Married, single, and divorced women are all about as likely, controlling for age and marital status, to have kids now as they were in 2001. But today, a smaller proportion of women are married during those peak-fertility years…

Whose fault is that?

Who proposes again?

Don’t get me going on homewreckers

https://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/wrong-man-right-woman/21150

The numbers of marriages are declining, but now we are seeing attempts to destabilise the ones already in existence by replacing negative perceptions of the “failed marriage” with the idea that still-functioning marriages are actually failures – that those still married have “failed to escape”

In this “me-first” age, the tendency is to choose someone as much like oneself as possible, and now partners can even be selected from a catalogue. Possibly in future we will be able to clone our partners so that they share our every taste and enthusiasm and, of course, our every virtue.

They already do with brainwashing.

Whether friendly or unfriendly, children often they pay the price of divorce in their own happiness and in difficulties forming long-term relationships in later life. Even if they do marry, they will not be equipped to handle positively marital problems, but may give up at the first hurdle,

selfish people should never marry

I’ve never seen it end well.

since they will not have observed their parents working at problems and emerging from bad patches – which all marriages encounter – stronger and more stable.

The child psychology is clear that if you are unwilling to get married, you shouldn’t have children because they need that security. A monogamous set of parents, no affairs. What causes most divorce? Where there’s a true cause – unfaithfulness, to the vows.

We have gone from sanctioning divorce only in very difficult cases to viewing it as the legitimate answer for people who are not completely happy all the time. But the only people who will gain from couples splitting up because they are not completely happy are the housing market and Ikea.

Sexy affair shows, film and TV. Count ’em.
Include soaps, why not?

It used to be a few avant garde productions that got surprising attention like The English Patient (then Colin Firth became a cuck in real life, recently*) but now you only see happy adulterers, no happy marrieds. Quite a cultural change.

Apart from that, we will have a nation of miserable children, for whom marriage appears to be an impossible dream, and lonely old people consoling themselves for doing the wrong thing by insisting that they married the wrong person. We will be a nation of “wrong people” who have forgotten how to do the right thing.

*that’s what you get for marrying a foreigner.

High IQ, low common sense of minimum wage

http://www.unz.com/freed/capitalism-and-the-minimum-wage-i-got-mine-screw-you/

It’s a demographic problem. You could cite HBD.

Traceable by national IQ.

Being tied to economic prosperity. Civic participation. Prosociality.

On the abstract plane, it’s a social problem. Politicians give the proles what they want, disproportionate to their current contributions. They’re being treated as more important than they are, based on their historical value (prior to mechanization and the rise of IT).

The middle class are signalling to suppress the strivers from overtaking their own 1-2 kids.
The childless ones are signalling because a dumpy middle class blogger hashtagging about refugees like the modern fainting couch gets more social cred than a 12 hour a day factory worker. Which one gives back to the country?

The upper class abandoned noblesse oblige and the upper class by occupation prefer obscurity to the vagaries of fame. The lumpenprole expect gadgets made well and cheaply and will force the Government to regulate the manufacturers into oblivion in this quest.

A basic wage, guaranteed bribe income would come in, if there existed the funds.
No, producers are taxed to the hilt, as is.

It comes down to a basic fact: people are not the same.

The high IQ deserve 100% of the fruit to their labour, as does the low IQ.
By comparison, one has more, but only because one provided more.

Inequality is a natural law.

Foreigners lied on 2011 census, claimed to be British

What a surprise that they lied. Like it’s a little badge you pin on.

It’s illegal to lie on the census, btw.

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census-analysis/ethnicity-and-religion-of-non-uk-born-population-in-england-and-wales–2011-census/rpt.html

Worse still, they’re claiming to be White British. The only group that means Native (to the UK). I would like to see that section completed by DNA test.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

  • The 2011 Census showed that almost half (46%, 3.4 million) of the foreign-born population identified with a White ethnic group, a third identified as Asian/Asian British (33%, 2.4 million) and 13% (992,000) identified with Black/African/Caribbean/Black British.
  • More than 1 in 8 foreign-born residents (13%, 949,000) classified themselves as White British.

They’re still using British instead of English, in England….

  • The largest group who identified as White British were German born (57%, 155,000) and over half (56%) of them arrived before 1981. One likely reason is due to British military personnel being stationed in Germany. The next largest group identifying as White British were from South Africa (85,000).
  • A quarter of the foreign-born population identified as Other White (28%, 2.1 million) and the largest group were from Poland (528,000). Over 9 in 10 Polish born residents identified with Other White and the majority (94%, 496,000) arrived between 2001 and 2011, with Poland’s accession into the European Union in 2004.
  • The majority of South African born residents identified as White (84%) and over two fifths identified as White British (44%). Most of those identifying with White British (68%) arrived before 2001.
  • A broad range of ethnic groups was found with Iraqi and Iranian born residents. For Iraq, most common was Arab (39%), Any Other ethnic group (28%) and Asian (17%). For Iran, most common was Asian/Asian British (38%), Any Other ethnic group (34%) and Other White (13%).
  • High proportions of residents who were Kenyan, Tanzanian and Ugandan born identified as Asian (69%, 68% and 58% respectively).
  • Of the foreign-born population in England and Wales nearly half identified as Christian (48%) and a fifth identified as Muslim (19%).  Around 1 in 7 had No religion (14%).

If we look for the Excel sheets because I’m a huge nerd, ethnicity of England is a terrifying study.

http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/KS201EW/view/2092957699?cols=measures

IN ENGLAND, in 2011, there were just 42,796,237 English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish.

THAT’S IT.

SOME OF THOSE WERE PROBABLY LIES.

shock horror wtf omg no denial signs

The figure we’re often told, outdated, is 69 million in the whole UK. With illegals, it’s more like 80 million by food consumption, which can’t be hidden. What’s that ratio, in England (most of those being in London), roughly? About close to 1:1 outnumbered in our own native homeland. I need a drink.

ummmm drinking oh dear no uh oh tyrion game of thrones drinking

Most of these will be elderly.

The economy is fucked!

http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/KS201EW/view/2013265927?cols=measures

Self-identified Whites in London are about half. Well, this is bollocks I can tell you.

Compare to the South East, a prosperous area for people who hate Londonistan:
http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/KS201EW/view/2013265928?cols=measures

About 7/8 are white.

For lolz, Wales: http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/KS201EW/view/2092957700?cols=measures

2,928,253 out of 3,063,456. 96%.

Fuck it, I’m moving to Wales. Escape route sorted. Apocalypse measures.

superman drinking give up nope

The African influx will be endless (demographics)

MENA, actually. All the best parts of the world, renowned for their hardworking, peaceable, altruistic citizenry. Who definitely won’t have a 30 year water shortage coming up, because they can sustain the basic level of civilization like water. Otherwise Malthus would be right and we can’t have that.
*somewhere, a large teeth trap groaning in the distance*

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/08/daily-chart-growth-areas

Just look at this, pink bar. These numbers are low balls.

That looks fiiine.

NEW population forecasts from the United Nations point to a new world order in 2050. The number of people will grow from 7.3 billion to 9.7 billion in 2050, 100m more than was estimated in the UN’s last report two years ago. More than half of this growth comes from Africa, where the population is set to double to 2.5 billion. Nigeria’s population will reach 413m, overtaking America as the world’s third most-populous country. Congo and Ethiopia will swell to more than 195m and 188m repectively, more than twice their current numbers. India will surpass China as the world’s most populous country in 2022, six years earlier than was previously forecast. China’s population will peak at 1.4 billion in 2028; India’s four decades later at 1.75 billion. Changes in fertility make long-term projections hard, but by 2100 the planet’s population will be rising past 11.2 billion. It will also be much older. The median age of 30 will rise to 36 in 2050 and 42 in 2100—the median age of Europeans today. A quarter of Europe’s people are already aged 60 or more; by 2050 deaths will outnumber births by 32m. The UN warns that only migration will prevent the region’s population from shrinking further.

But – immigrants take more than they supply. They bring over their whole families, which require support, and all their elderly relatives, far outpacing the care the one worker coming over could supply the natives.
How about banning contraception and abortion? Wouldn’t that raise native populations?

Well, shit. Nothing about IQ, predictably. We live in a high IQ society. It runs on high IQ like lifeblood. It requires high IQ people.
Best we can do is build a big wall around these places of growth and wait about a hundred years.
If they haven’t sorted themselves out by then and built some sort of civilization, we can happily give up.
Everything we do interfering in Africa has made it worse. I’ll leave this picture here, source: http://e360.yale.edu/slideshow/global_population_projected_to_reach_11_billion_by_2100_un_estimates/479/1/

I’ve never seen these mediated by national IQ score. Never. Not once. Someone call the HBD people.

As for their supposed ‘solution’ –

this only counts 1st gen, no 2nd gen+ and no ‘refugees’

Yet to be updated since this EU BS.

The demographic boom of Africa and world future trends

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/07/16/the-amazing-surprising-africa-driven-demographic-future-of-the-earth-in-9-charts/

The local underestimation on government record is deliberate, by appearing smaller in number, they can extract more Western resources because coping.

Africa will continue to be a problem, probably the world’s biggest demographic problem (everybody’s problem), for at least the majority of this century. Yes, century, due to demo momentum.

There is plenty of arable land and resources… and the Chinese are greedily trying to buy these up. I suggest we shift White Man’s Burden onto these Asians who want to profiteer from Africa, wash our hands of the issue once and for all. Let them sort it out, they bought a lemon with those tenants. Most illegal immigrants to Europe are able, young male workers, but Africa doesn’t have any to spare (and those are the best they have, which says something).

Africa is a much larger landmass than we’ve all been led to believe, the maps we grew up with were corrected to fit well on maps and children’s globes (for memory) and make the oceans appear proportional to their real size, as a consequence Africa has been vastly under-depicted.  The NGOs have kept this lie because it’s hard to ask for money to give to an entire continent which dwarfs your own and, rightly, should be the ones supporting you instead.

http://goafrica.about.com/od/africatraveltips/ig/Maps-of-Africa/Map-of-Africa-Showing-True-Size.htm

So no, the Africa Problem / Calais Crisis / EU Invasion Issue is NOT going away by a long shot. It’s here to stay and even by conservative estimates, it is set to get much, much worse.
I’m not happy about this, but it’s the truth.

The UK can fit into Africa over 120 times.

You deserve a slightly better explanation so I dug this up.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2010/11/cartography

…the fact that most people do not realise how much the ubiquitous Mercator projection distorts the relative sizes of countries.

A sphere cannot be represented on a flat plane without distortion, which means all map projections distort in one way or another. Some projections show areas accurately but distort distances or scales, for example; others preserve the shapes of countries but misrepresent their areas. You can read all the gory details on Wikipedia.

Gerardus Mercator’s projection, published in 1569, was immediately useful because it depicts a line of constant bearing as a straight line, which is handy for marine navigation. The drawback is that it distorts the shapes and areas of large land masses, and the distortion gets progressively worse as you get closer to the poles. (Africa looks about the same size as Greenland under the Mercator projection, for example, even though it is in fact 14 times bigger.) This was not a big problem for 16th-century sailors, of course, and the Mercator projection remains popular to this day……

Yes, I know, I’m a genius, but it’s mostly the old study of oceanography maps. It isn’t that hard, merely niche knowledge.

…An alternative and arguably more rigorous approach would be to repeat the exercise using an “equal area” projection that shows the countries’ areas correctly while minimising shape distortion. These two properties are the hardest to balance when showing the whole world on one map. I decided to rework Mr Krause’s map using Gall’s Stereographic Cylindrical Projection (1855) with two standard parallels at 45°N and 45°S. Distortions are still evident at the poles, but for most countries shape is maintained, and their areas are shown correctly. As you can see (below), the results are distinct from Mr Krause’s map. But however you look at it, his point is a good one: Africa is much bigger than it looks on most maps….

Drumroll plz

Needy, or Greedy?

Millennial women rejecting feminism, long for hearth and home

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/07/03/the-futures-bright-young-people-more-conservative-than-parents-generation-and-the-trend-is-increasing/

…The increasing conservatism of the younger generation is not something that has gone unnoticed by the left and right-wing alike. Guardian columnist John Harris reacted with utter horror after meeting real young people all across Britain as part of the Guardian’sAnywhere But Westminster exercise in trying to find “real politics”, and finding them to be remarkably conservative – even if they didn’t self-identify as ‘big-C’ Conservatives. He said:

“I was reminded of another very modern syndrome: the fact that as you progress down the age range, opinions about the job market and welfare state tend to harden, to the point that droves of twentysomethings sound like devout Thatcherites… this has become almost a given. Quiz people under 30, in short, and you’re more than likely to hear echoes of the kind of on-yer-bike, sink-or-swim values that decisively embedded themselves in British life when they were mere toddlers”….

Like I said in Best Post, we aren’t falling for it. We’re women, not workhorses.

We’ve seen all the divorced, the spinsters and the bitter and gone –

Yet the Left don’t see these people weren’t brainwashed, they grew up in a time of Leftist dominance. They know they’ll be on the target list eventually, useful pawns for their ideology. They refuse to be further used. What has the Left done for us? Replaced our jobs with immigrants, shut down our lolz on social media, nixed our hobbies for imaginary offences, crashed our parties with people who refuse to grow up and we can’t get a decent savings account, let alone a car (insurance, all those safety regulations) or a house.