They want to sterilise you (hCGβ)

It isn’t just Mark of the Beast, the Satanists want to sacrifice all your children, including potential. All count to Moloch.

The Mark is also a marker of infertility. Mark(er) of the Beast (whose sacrifice is what).

You know, owned infertility, like a pet. The Bible says never to get tattoos, and your duty on this earth is to be fruitful and make godly children. Scroll for just studies but context is important, I feel.

HCG-beta sterilises women (and children), what’s the bet it’ll be in one dose of one mandatory thingey, eventually?  As you’ll see, all it needs is one. It mimics fatal cancer, encouraging the body to shut down reproduction to struggle to fight it off. Maybe not the first dose officially to force you all, better space it out to avoid suspicion.
I wonder where they’ll put this, along with other sterilising agents? Mistakes were made, woops! You can’t sue!
Am I crazy now? I’m only covering HCG-beta today, 101 style. Do your own damn research and share share share the studies, 4chan, 8kun, the works.

Sterilization programme imminent like Bill and others did in Nigeria (and other places). Then again with HPV (which reduces fecundity, when checked with age-peers) as previously covered by me.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831725/

“The fear of vaccines: Fear that a vaccine used by the WHO to combat polio can cause sterility in both men and women, has spurred some Northern Nigerian states to block a crucial vaccination campaign that is aimed at eradicating the disease from West Africa. “

And you call Africa dumb? They’re not.
Herd immunity is a myth, also covered by me, even at 100% “coverage” (impossible) doesn’t work (unfalsifiable, fake science).
Remember, most spanish flu dead were vaccinated soldiers (and nurses), that’s why it got so many young people.
A pawpaw tested positive for this, FFS. A fruit and a goat!
They never say in ‘outbreaks’ of measles etc, how many who got sick ALREADY HAD the vaccine (most), they’ll deflect or try to hide that topic.

ONTO THE STUDIES:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/
“Efforts to produce a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) face several important challenges.”

A ‘vaccine’ to stop you from reproducing. Don’t believe me?

Journal of Reproductive Immunology:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037809004537
“Gonadotropin-releasing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin β based recombinant antibodies and vaccines”

Vaccines have been developed against both GnRH and hCG and these have undergone Phase I/II clinical trials documenting their safety, reversibility and efficacy. The heterospecies dimer hCG vaccine prevented pregnancy in women of proven fertility without impairment of ovulation or derangement of menstrual regularity and bleeding profiles.”

Jump through their evil hoops and they might let you be a free human again. Keep reproduction free! Also, end medical segregation. Slaves weren’t allowed to breed until their master said so.

Anti-fertility vaccines, you only naturally express it when you have ‘advanced’ cancer.

“Ectopic expression of hCG/hCGβ is observed in many advanced stage cancers of various origins.”

Mandatory? Medical Marxism argument: I can violate your body with bio-rape implants because it may possibly help me, theoretically – or some hypothetical person.

MEN AREN’T IN THE CLEAR.

“These reduce serum testosterone to castration levels causing atrophy of the prostate.”

CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

The prize is disappointment. No lollipop.
“Castration levels” you couldn’t make it up. Evil has a PhD.

Guessing atrophy is permanent? Sounds kinda permanent. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876172/
Linked to ‘adverse prognosis’ (death).

Expression of the free β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ) in malignant tumors is frequently associated with aggressive disease. The pretreatment serum concentration of hCGβ is an independent prognostic variable in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The three so-called type II genes (hCGβ 3/9, 5, and 8) have been shown to be up-regulated in relation to type I genes (hCGβ 6/7) in some malignant tumors.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167569986900290

“This vaccine consists of a synthetic peptide representing, the carboxy-terminal 37 amino acids of hCG beta subunit coupled to diphtheria toxoid. The immunogen is pre- pared by linking the peptide to the carrier using a bifunctional reagent (6-maleimido caproic acyl N- hydroxy saccinimide ester)is in a manner to achieve predictable…”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0264410X89900431

Search engine (DDG) description:

“The second candidate vaccine is oLH.hCG-TT/CHB: a-subunit of ovine LH associated with hCG, linked to carriers such as TT or cholera toxin chain B (CHB). The third vaccine preparation is a physical mixture of hCG and oLH, each linked to carriers. These vaccines have completed phase I clinical trials in five centres in India.”

1989 publication date.

1989

When you click:

Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future. Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.

This, in 1989. I didn’t exist then. Imagine what they have now.

Calling white people (or any) ‘females’ and ‘males’ is dehumanizing, especially intended to destroy you/r genetic lineage. Your God-given right. It just so happens black men recently popularised this use in rap, which isn’t controlled by a certain group with certain investments, is it? Phew.

They want you allergic to your own body. Autoimmune infertility, sterilization by antibody, it’s right there. CASTRATION, CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals”

It relates to cancer vaccines
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3172635/

Anti-fertility vaccine again
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0897.1981.tb00063.x

“Peptides representing the amino acid sequence of the carboxy‐terminal of the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) beta subunit were used in studies to determine whether an immunogen could be prepared that would be suitable for an HCG antifertility vaccine. Peptides of varying length were conjugated to several macro‐molecular carriers, in varying peptide‐carrier ratios…”

Chemical human neuter sounds so cruel.

They think they own you.

Target for cancer therapy, apparently? Nice excuse. Sounds so comfy, philanthropy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11500441_Tumor-associated_antigen_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_beta_contains_numerous_antigenic_determinants_recognized_by_in_vitro-induced_CD8_and_CD4_T_lymphocytes

WHO knows?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15504700_Functional_and_immunological_relevance_of_the_COOH-terminal_extension_of_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_b_Implications_for_the_WHO_birth_control_vaccine

“The World Health Organisation (WHO) Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines has selected the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a target molecule for a contraceptive vaccine.”

You didn’t wanna breed, right?
How much would you pay for an anti-anti-fertility vaccine?
Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines….. selected…. target… fucking Nazi ‘eugenics’ again.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7693535

Christians are up first.

They later changed the name for being too obvious on a scale of really fucking obvious to taking le piss. Henceforth, it has become really fucking obvious.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951

“Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo.”

So including chemical abortion, like the Pill.

18,years, as of writing, totally off the cuff.

BIRTH CONTROL VACCINES, THE PROGRESS CONTINUES:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12286012/

NO SHIT, THAT’S THE TITLE. They think they own you.

During 1986-1988, the WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction used the diphtheria toxoid as a carrier for a fragment of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) molecule (a conjugate immunogen) and an immunostimulant in a phase I clinical trial of this prototype antifertility vaccine in sterilized women. Between 1990 and 1991, it conducted teratology studies in rats and rabbits to determine whether the vaccine causes fetal abnormalities. The vaccine did not adversely affect either the animals or their fetuses. Clinical trials of the vaccine’s effectiveness (phase II trials) are scheduled for 1992. At least 2 injections several weeks apart, are needed to produce an anti-hCG immune response which is only effective for 3-6 months, however. So the same components of the original vaccine were placed in a polymer to deliver the vaccine slowly over a prolonged and predetermined time frame. WHO hoped that this advanced vaccine would raise effective immunity levels long enough to last for at least 1 year after 1 injection. WHO is conducting dose-response and toxicity studies of this prototype vaccine in rabbits and baboons to identify the optimal dose which would elicit an effective immunity level over a desired period of time and would be safe for testing in humans. WHO hopes to begin a phase I clinical trial with this advanced anti-hCG vaccine in late 1992. WHO anticipates that the preclinical and clinical trials will reveal a need for further modifications and improvements. WHO is supported multicenter research on antitrophoblast vaccines which target membrane cells of the preimplantation embryo since 1985. It uses monoclonal antibodies (MABs) and recombinant DNA technology to identify and isolate surface molecules. So far this research has tested 15,000 MABs but is centering on 9 MAbs. A study in baboons showed that 1 MAB reduced fertility, even though researchers could only use minute amounts of the protein in the injection.

Population control = PR for genocide. Go after the guidestones people and their love of carving stone.

PR is rebranded propaganda to the post-war period, rebranded deliberately by the likes of one Bernays. That is historical fact.

Immunogenicity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X96000461
“Vaccines based on hCG have been proposed as a means either to prevent metastatic cancr6 or to control fertility’. Approaches to development of such vaccines have been pursued usij either the complete beta sub unit of hCG (hCG-fl) or the 37 amino acid CTP alone”

Most people wouldn’t want an anti-cancer anything if it made them sterile.

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/6/1/166/875911

“The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities”

“As a result of this inter national, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

Guess the year. Guess. I’ll tell you in a few lines.*

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277953695000378
“Immunization to regulate fertility…”

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Beta-HCG
“produced by placental cells”

*It’s 1991 published above re WHO. 
PDF here: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.883.9964&rep=rep1&type=pdf

save save save

bookmark, usb, email, any way you can get this all out there

This one is tricksy.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0218-118?draft=marketing

“Even though the idea of a birth control vaccine was gaining traction

… WHO task force trial undertaken on women in Sweden testing the vaccine …”

described in SEO brief

paywalls should be illegal

maybe you can find this paper on the piratebay of academic papers

https://scihub.to/

No excuses. Weird they hide this recent one re Swedish info, because it’s ongoing?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/S0968-8080%2897%2990087-2

Published 1997.

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertifity vaccines

spellings are often deliberate to thwart SEO

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertility vaccines

corrected

This paper describes the controversy surrounding anti-fertility vaccines, focusing on the antihCG vaccine. It deals first with the rationale that researchers give for the development of antifertility vaccines, and the specific requirements that they set for the new contraceptive method.
Two distinct prototypes of anti-hCG vaccines are clearly emerging, one of which might be
characterised as maximising safety and the other as maximising efficacy. A vocal group of
women’s health advocates have opposed the development of both prototype vaccines, pointing to
theoretical health risks and the potential for abuse, and call for a stop to further research. This
paper shows how the scientists’ discourse on safety and acceptability of the technology to future
users has changed in response to the critique of women’s health advocates. Finally, it reflects on
the role of women’s health advocates in contraceptive technology development, and the
responses of researchers to their actions.

They took over womens’ groups to avoid discussion of important issues.

TLDR trust the “scientists” what human ‘error’? let alone ‘evil’ trust the ‘experts’

you know, pre-replication crisis

scientists often own stock so….. null appeal

2015
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/

The possibility of a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin has long been recognized, but never fully realized.

weird, previously they’ve claimed success in ‘trials’?

they think you’re stupid

you can’t ban something they claim doesn’t exist (yet)

Here we describe an epitope-specific approach based on immunogenic display of hCG-derived peptides on virus-like particles of RNA bacteriophage. A number of recombinant VLPs were constructed, each displaying a different hCG-derived peptide. Some were taken from the disordered C-terminal tail of the hormone, another came from an internal loop, and yet another was an epitope mimic produced by affinity-selection on an hCG-neutralizing antibody target. Immunization of mice with some VLPs yielded antisera that bound the hormone and neutralized hCG biological activity.”

neutralised, like a threat
neutered you – like a dog

share share share the studies, you don’t have to link to me just SHARE

I haven’t posted this previously to avoid it getting censored prematurely.
Is anyone else keeping a tally of how many times I can piss off the WHO or NWO people without being murdered? Just me?

Genetic load and no, you’re not entitled to breed.

The low IQ Americans: MUH ANCESTORS
-died. Mostly died. STFU with the snowflaking outrage.

Maths below.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297657116_Mutation_and_Human_Exceptionalism_Our_Future_Genetic_Load

Although the human germline mutation rate is higher than that in any other well-studied species, the rate is not exceptional once the effective genome size and effective population size are taken into consideration. Human somatic mutation rates are substantially elevated above those in the germline, but this is also seen in other species.

What is exceptional about humans is the recent detachment from the challenges of the natural environment and the ability to modify phenotypic traits in ways that mitigate the fitness effects of mutations, e.g., precision and personalized medicine. This results in a relaxation of selection against mildly deleterious mutations, including those magnifying the mutation rate itself.

Actually, it’s anti-selection aka dysgenics. There is always a pressure in some direction, read Darwin?

You can’t have dystopia without dysgenics. That’s all a dystopia is.

The long-term consequence of such effects is an expected genetic deterioration in the baseline human condition,

Non-uniform.

By race and subrace.

potentially measurable on the timescale of a few generations in westernized societies,

Which metrics?

Technically you only need one truly fuck-up generation (say Boomers) to install those social policies up to 3 (living memory). This is without external group effects i.e. invasion on a genetic level, rape. So it isn’t fair to say immigration caused this, it compounds it severely. The Boomers and their outsized ingroup-gene infanticide will go down in history as mass murderers, if there’s anyone left.

and because the brain is a particularly large mutational target, this is of particular concern. Ultimately, the price will have to be covered by further investment in various forms of medical intervention.

Medicine isn’t magic. It cannot do that. We already cannot afford the current population with the present and dwindling useful tax base, let alone Japan levels of old coots living to infinity and China levels of population size.

You can’t fuck your way out of this, r-types. You can’t immigrate it either, those new entries have a lower IQ, higher overall group fertility and represent a smaller usable tax base. Debt doesn’t exist to cover this medical cost, even digital money typing. You can’t even type your way out of it. Hyperinflation would occur first, long before actually. Try running the numbers, see if you’re as smart as me. The cost of quality food is the anchor point. Of all living expenses, that one actually keeps you alive?

Don’t become a doctor, kids. Medicine bubble, heard it here first.

Hell, NHS GPs are already quitting now. Retention will only get worse. The ones who stay have lower IQ and can’t find gainful employment anywhere else. This is how socialism degrades infrastructure, the first generation the NHS seemed fine but the second, it attracted parasites to become GPs for the money and by the third, the original talented ones (by private sector standards) had retired and died, leaving training downhill from there.

Other people have explained that before. That one isn’t me.

Resolving the uncertainties of the magnitude and timescale of these effects will require the establishment of stable, standardized, multigenerational measurement procedures for various human traits.

Measurement? We’re lower IQ than ingroup Victorian ancestors by reaction time.

No action?

No correction?

No control?

No standards?

No relevant barriers to entry? Say, for breeding? At least on state funding?

Shows what they think of the producers, dunnit?

Leave the leech alone! The parasites are fine!

Yeah wait a few generations, maybe a century and hope the metrics are correctly chosen to matter!

Long after the researchers are dead so you can’t kill them for being wrong.

This is Idiocracy, even academia is full of nitwits.

We used to have a breeding license, it’s called a marriage certificate.

Below a certain IQ, you can’t actually consent to get married or breed. Maybe study that first?

No, that would be both logical and responsible.

See, I don’t just sit here bitching. I have solutions but nobody listens.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291734415_Mean_household_size_in_mid-Tudor_Englandclackclose_hundred_Norfolk

cites
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313794802_Mutation_Accumulation_Theory

nb Historians and real scientists say European, liars typically say Caucasian.

For example, among European populations in the year 1600 AD the average individual had around a 25-40 % chance of dying in infancy, a 50 % chance of dying during childhood (Volk and Atkinson 2008), and only around a 40 % chance of fully participating in reproduction (Rühli and Henneberg 2013). The average family size was close to five in 1600s England (Arkell & Whiteman, 1998) -given the high rates of pre- term, infant, and child mortality, the numbers ever conceived would likely have been considerably higher. These historical Western infant and child mortality statistics are similar to those observed in contemporary hunter-gatherer populations (Volk and Atkinson 2008)

I’ll list the maths since there’s always that one idiot who “disagrees”.

Of those born, low ball:

100 – 25% = 75
75 – 50% = 37.5
37.5 – 40% = 15
15 of 100 births eventually reproduced, at best.

Your ancestors in 1600 weren’t entitled to breed either. STFU, stupid sections of America.
Natural selection is important.

RITES OF PASSAGE. TOUGH ONES.

Assuming you aren’t tradlarping?

Bear in mind, that wasn’t sex-specific and those estimates are the population i.e. they have to breed with one another.*

Less conservative estimate:

100 – 40% = 60
60 – 50% = 30
30 – 40% = 12
12 of 100 births eventually reproduced, by academic estimate. The more realistic one.

Again, stop being so entitled. Considering the odds, five kids average is actually pretty low.
The entitled brats, appealing to a tradition that’s totally ignorant and imaginary, are the spiteful mutants. In any other time period, you’d probably be dead by now. Male infant mortality is higher than female overall for humans, which hasn’t been factored in. 

And WWs 1 and 2 culled the bravest genes of that millennia selection by machine gun and sniper.

At least the bankers made mo- wait, they’ve already “run out” of fake money. Less than a century later.

What was it all for?

so

7.5%

or 7.5/100 births eventually reproduced as a couple TOPS

down to, more reasonably

6% of MEN* (or women, maybe**) compared to the grandfather’s generation.

[Father 50% reproduction as male, Grandfather 100% comparison, since all grandfathers would have bred logically.]

or 6/100 births from the total population, coupled.

Assuming 50/50 male/female birth split and flat survival, which doesn’t exist.**

Since breeding requires TWO people, America.

3 generations tops, with a 6% male survival in 1600 Europe.

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR.

6% by sex.

This doesn’t further subdivide by health, wealth, religion or attractiveness.

If one surviving guy in that 100 births total was infertile or refused marriage, you can kinda see why it was a big deal.

This is why inheritance was always conditional on religion, approved choice of spouse and vitally, children.

If the Boomers wanna do some good, write into your will your kids get nothing unless actively Christian, married, with at least one child with a spouse you approve of. They won’t do it. They’ll complain about no grandkids though. That never gets old.

Spiteful mutants

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0084-x
Social Epistasis Amplifies the Fitness Costs of Deleterious Mutations, Engendering Rapid Fitness Decline Among Modernized Populations

Deleterious mutations are typically understood exclusively in terms of their harmful effects on carrier organisms. But there are convincing reasons to think that such adverse effects are not confined to the individual level. We argue that in social species, interorganismal gene-gene interactions, which in previous literatures have been termed social epistasis, allow genomes carrying deleterious mutations to reduce via group-level pleiotropy the fitness of others, including noncarriers.

Personally I think that’s nature’s IQ test, but go on.

(If you can be talked out of your instincts, you don’t deserve to breed).

This fitness reduction occurs by way of degradation of group-level processes that optimize the reproductive ecology of a population for intergroup competition through, among other mechanisms, suppression of free-riding.

If you can be talked out of it by people who hate you…

Such damage to group regulatory processes suggests a hidden role for the accumulation of behavior-altering “spiteful” mutations in the dynamics of the demographic transition—these mutations may have contributed to the maladaptive outcomes of this process, such as widespread subreplacement fertility.

Hmm. Not really. Multi-factorial.

A structured population model is presented describing aspects of this social epistasis amplification model. This phenomenon is also considered as a potential explanation for the results of Calhoun’s mouse utopia experiments, which provide an opportunity to directly test a major prediction stemming from the model.

Discouraging breeding is spiteful mutant if the host does it themselves, particularly from their own inability (no mate) rather than true choice. Picture all the women running round babying tranny feels.
If not, could be eugenic if encouraging the unfit only to abstain OR environmental, as desire for a family drops for group survival temporarily based on crime level and as high trust society becomes low trust; although GDP is an important consideration, for men as provider, moreso than women.

There’s also a connection to solar cycles and crops/food availability. Nobody’s sure if white people can sense it. Needs a study. But birth rate is tracked quite well to solar cycle, if you look.

Related papers:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0470870850.ch10
Is There a g Factor for Fitness?

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97518.x
Fitness Decline under Relaxed Selection in Captive Populations

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311841253_Mutation_Accumulation_Theory

What got me interested in the longevity of society?

I was obsessed with the question, why did Rome fall, why did Romans fail?

It fell for three reasons and failed for one. It fell because of the fractional reserve ‘fiat’ slavery that ensnared everybody, the decadence of the patrician classes trickling down via moral decline to full degeneracy of society and solar-incited crop failures (fed an army but mostly women, children aka the future). The Empire failed because of the People, they were no longer a People, homogeneously, by inviting their former slaves, who doubtless believed they were Roman citizens too (magic dirt), and breeding with them, the composition of the Roman people became weak and remains weak to this day. Otherwise they’d have bounced back, the sins of the father, onto the son. Once water has been sullied, its original purity is lost. Empires fail when they take slaves instead of slaying the conquered, that communist laziness. Think about it, you’re inviting a known (pissed-off) enemy back home to influence your future. Rome was literally polluted with the blood of losers, a society which initially prized itself on strength, vigour and bloodlines. Their dysgenic dicks led to their demise, one family at a time. They enabled spoiled sons and eventually lose their fortunes.
Shortly after my research, I discovered all Empires fail by the same pattern.
Look for wheat yields, if you want. Europe has the best records. The Middle Ages drop in wheat really revolved around Renaissance degeneracy. Read r/k into it, maybe biohistory or HBD but it’s all out there.

It’s WIKI TIER.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_ancient_Rome
“The final way a slave could be obtained was through birth: if a female slave gave birth to a child, that child became property of the slave’s owner. Extramarital relations with women who were not citizens was not considered to be adultery under Roman law (and Roman wives were expected to tolerate such behavior), so there was no legal or moral impediment to having children being fathered by a slave’s owner or overseer.”
They preferentially bred with their slaves. I’m sure such anti-Christian adultery and random heirs running around caused no problems, least of all accidental incest. Christianity came too late to save them. #badum-ttssh

Screwing their ‘slaves’ emboldened them, the sexual validation made them consider themselves equals, as nothing else does:

“Land owners also faced problems with slave rebellions at times.”

no shit?

“In addition to invasions by Carthaginians and Celtic tribes, slaves rebellions and civil wars which were repeatedly fought on Italian soil all contributed to the destruction of traditional agricultural holdings

Civil war? What changed? Except the population. And its new savage composition.

Don’t open that door.

“Also, as Rome’s agriculture declined, people now judged others by their wealth rather than their character.”

Materialism and hook-ups because it takes two to Devil’s tango. Every time men drop the ball of leading society as a moral authority, they blame women. Um. Nah. Stop fucking cheap pussy. It brings down Empires.

And the yuck factor of what certain modern men are willing to sleep with (manjaw mongrel mystery meat types) is subconsciously putting off white women from considering wanting kids with them. You see pics of their “ex” and go, ew no. All women do this. All races do this. You could actually do a study on this, if he shows a pic of a same-race girl or other, odds of wanting another date? Nobody’s jealous, it’s disgust.

https://www.washington.edu/news/2016/08/17/study-finds-bias-disgust-toward-mixed-race-couples/

Participants responded faster to images of same-race couples and selected them more often for inclusion in the study. More significantly, Skinner said, participants showed higher levels of activation in the insula — an area of the brain routinely implicated in the perception and experience of disgust — while viewing images of interracial couples.

“That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level,” Skinner said.

Nobody’s jealous of the mud sharks and rice cookers. Like nobody is jealous of fat girl tits.

Sure, that one part is nice but…. at what cost?

The guys who brag about their exotic exes end up lonely for a reason. High flight risk. Not to mention shitty taste. Likely poor parental skills. Low racial loyalty – including to their own kids. Then the fact mixers are by default lower quality to the point they can’t ‘make it’ with their own. Just… no. Women would literally rather buy a tiny handbag dog than breed with a weeb, for the most common example you can ask as a socially acceptable question at the bar and get away with. As a cost/benefit analysis, it just isn’t worth it. Women contribute more to their existing family’s survival with relatives than squandering personal resources on inferior genetics, men do not get this. They assume all women have baby rabies. Nope. Women filter to keep the species somewhat intact, the debt system has made the low quality women bolder. And this applies across the races between women, actually, any out-group involvement. I guess it’s a K motivator among women for the tribe’s collective gain. To reject the disloyal genetics plus the risk of outer diseases. I’d be willing to bet money in a study the girlfriends of such weebs would be more likely to abort his baby than average, more willing. I’d guess her oxytocin with him is also lower. Whether or not she’s the same race as him.

https://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

“In evolutionary terms, one could argue that mixed-race marriages are maladaptive in that they reduce a person’s overall genetic fitness – i.e. passing on copies of one’s own genes.  In a multiracial marriage or relationship, one is showing altruism toward a partner who shares fewer genes than a co-ethnic would share.  A parent will also share fewer genes with a multiracial child than with a same-race child.”

Instincts evolved for a reason. Genetic distance means white people always lose, mathematically, as the recessive race. I’ve posted about it before. White parents of mixed kids are less than half related to them, that’s why non-whites want us. The white party’s cucking themselves. If you could fill up a soda cup in a bigger or smaller size, you’d go for the best deal for you. Genetically, they can pass more on with a white partner as their vessel. The white parent’s unique traits are lost by recombination/mutation, dilution of mixing per se plus regression to the mean e.g. with iq. That’s also why supermodels have plain or fugly kids or parents.

Blaming mixed people for their health problems is bloody evil e.g. shaming mixed blacks in America for a “bad diet” predisposing them to heart conditions, outsized to the common population. Turns out a lot of the white guys raping their slaves had awful cardiac health.

This is why patriarchy’s approach to rape claims is “hang ’em high”. The law must be a deterrent and since their intention is to extend their lifespan by breeding without masculine commitment, a death penalty of rapists is just.

Men acting/bluffing like they’re morally better for being sexually weaker is just sad.

https://speedywordz.blogspot.com/2015/12/cut-your-coat-according-to-your-cloth.html

Control the rest of the world and still, if you cannot control yourself it won’t matter, no respect.

A little more on the agri page:

Roman agricultural practices may have contributed to soil depletion throughout the Roman world.”

The same rules apply elsewhere.

If you look at the British Empire, it was the foundation of globalism. Sorry but… yeah. We got too cocky and that’s why we fed them. We fed the bear.

White saviour became white martyr. Depicting Jesus as white was a mistake.

Culturally, the degeneracy started by Victorian hypocrites.

All the Victorian brothels enabled by weak priests, cheating judges and stupid wives (enjoy your syphilitic dead baby, remarkably preserved in its jar to this day) instigated the cultural norm of sexual deviance looooong before the 1960s.

The wages of sin are death.

Stop slutting.

Reject usury.

This isn’t hard.

Global Trends, Europe

2018:

Promising other people’s money is slavery.

Fuck you, champagne socialists.

The Guardian academia protests about ‘muh pensions’ won’t be the half of it. You didn’t earn a pension, Rome fell by making them non-military too. Public pensions are a myth to compel obedience from these useful idiots.

Being sustainable actually = national sustainability and avoiding over-breeding beyond food security and other needs. K-selection, not the promising of fiat gibs.

Caps from:

Click to access Global_Strategic_Trends_-_The_Future_Starts_Today.pdf

search food, meat, protein, China

just have fun

“Immigration could offset population declines in Europe”

and they show a photo of Muslims.

EU growth since 2000: 17% against the world average of 47%

Yes, let’s leave the Marxists in charge of everything.

They actually think the GDP will be the same with more Muslims and declining native population, with it declining national IQ.

Because we’re all interchangeable cogs, right?

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is death.

You cannot make accurate predictions with this. GDP is best predicted by national IQ,

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/the-smart-fraction-theory-of-iq-and-the-wealth-of-nations/

“the value 0.73 actually underestimates the strength of the relationship”

so the racial genocide replacement politely called ‘demographic change’ will cause national IQ to decline and with it, GDP. Even less revenue than now, idiots.

Run the bloody numbers.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

Not that we’re avoiding ((debt)) even now.

They actually think GDP is a constant though, like the Sun rising in the East, it just happens.

Nobody takes extra hours because the tax system is fairer or wants to work hard as a virtue, no. No effort, just rely on it.

They actually think this. R-types do not understand resource scarcity or how hard it is to build up resources. They are infinite, in their minds.

They want to replace you. Remember this when they’re begging to be saved by random white people.

No appeal to white guilt, thank you. #Notyourwhitesavior 

The EU needs us, our military, as previously covered.

They can’t get a federal Europe until we feel threatened enough to sign up.

They also screech about fascism without using the word.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/04/30/fascism-historically/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/17/told-ya-so-eu-army-forced/

All you need is one damn book to understand this better than the MOD:

The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics

Who would win?

 

MOD budget versus $6.99.

From the smart fraction post:

Thus, for a technologically sophisticated society, SFT asserts that a nation’s per capita GDP is determined by the population fraction with IQ greater than or equal to some threshold IQ. Consistent with the data of Lynn and Vanhanen, that threshold IQ is 108, a bit less than the minimum required for what used to be a bachelor’s degree. Figure 3 illustrates the fit of (3) to the data of Lynn and Vanhanen.

Dysgenics kills GDP.

Your immigration policy will starve you, State, for importing voter leeches.

They find about 70% of the variance in IQ is associated with genetic variation. Bouchard et al, Science, Oct 12, 1990, present an excellent review of these studies.”

Know thy HBD or die.

Controlling thus for environmental factors, Murray found earnings stratified conspicuously by IQ.

There is much more, Estraneo, but two nails are sufficient to fix the direction of a one-way sign. The arrow of cause points mostly from IQ to income, and not the other way round.”

The eugenic economy

More than 15% of the population are literally useless.

This won’t end well.

Most of this hovering percentage (depending where you draw the line, with machine replacement) are male.

Society has no answer for this. There is no logical way to pander to them and save society from the thing sinking it aka them.

Einstein really hated white men, because the public introduction of nukes (muh publication and global display) has made it so we can’t cull our own useless eaters (the angry gamma types that hate authority, women and standards).

This is the death sentence of not cutting out cancer because it’s technically your own cells.

That’s what this has done. This is the start of dysgenics, nothing else.

I’m sure cancer cells would call for Muh Loyalty so the Titanic doesn’t patch its own hull and bail out water.

Breeding only comes a while after considerations of birth (i.e. the fact you must be born to be a parental candidate). Regression to the mean also pummels every population. This isn’t a one-time sweep.

Gammas: “muh right side of the bell curve!”

About that: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/05/21/iq-results-between-the-sexes-the-problem/

Here’s one study they cherry-pick:

A grand total of two points. Don’t build your spaceships to escape the cooties just yet.”

And even there, look at the other half. Literally. Everything to the left of 1SD.

“When it comes to geniuses, these guys are trying to claim they’re Einstein by association.
That is retarded. Claim to be Hercules at least, he was male too. Aim high in your delusion.”

They hate authority because, being too stupid to be able to complete instructions, they assume the instructor hates them. They hate women because we’re sensitive to avoid any indicator of retarded offspring (ultimate waste of investment, more than being barren and caring for relatives). They hate standards because they know, deep down, in any society they’d be inferior and it would be out of reach. This makes them spiteful e.g. the anti-merit of barring women from colleges when they qualify. If you really think women are dumber, what do you care if you’d get in? Logically, they’d want weaker aka dumber people as their competition (why white SJWs want non-white SJWs in college). They think everyone cheats (college scandal) because they have to. Academia is now run by cheats (replication crisis) and its reputation under conservatives is no longer present.

This will lead to dystopia, which we’re already seeing moderately ripe fruits of.

They feel threatened by anyone because everyone is, statistically, an intellectual threat.

This explains chimp-outs at completely normal people and whatever the white version is, the mantrum?

The omegas are quiet and fine, the classic manual labourers.  They mix the drinks, pick the food, clean the guns. Gammas have delusions of grandeur (supported by equalism) and when they fail, they’re the revenge fantasists. The low IQ/aggression link comes through there.

The SJWism started in the military when they forgot their purpose – cull the people society cannot feed.

This no below-X requirement is convenient for SJWs, who tend to be lower on the IQ scale themselves and oddly fearful of a draft that hasn’t happened since the last century.

The military have been pussies since world wars one and two, when, wouldn’t you know it, men started to go soft.

Yeah, because you practiced a dysgenic cull. In war, there’s always a cull. Introducing exemptions on age or fitness or IQ or mental malingering or having Daddy Moneybags will kill the country more surely than the cause.

Men went weak because of this. They over-compensate now with machines, all the gadgets in the world won’t help when your national IQ is declining. America needed Operation Paperclip or we’d all be speaking Russian now, because those non-white poor huddled masses from the previous 50 years had overbred.

Zero sum funding, the smart or the stupid. All the money to ‘rehabilitate’ criminals, to prison PS4s, to the translator in a primary school is money away from real art, real culture, real innovation, actual intelligence. It is costing you already.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/24/link-iq-and-standard-of-living/

Dumb men being arse-covered by greedy ones. There are far, far more male criminals, aren’t there?

In terms of a genetic product, that is a quality issue. The SJWs sense this but draw the wrong conclusions. We already have touchy-feely men, they’re in politics keeping the stupid mass of men going, for fun and profit.

Fun: anti-fa.

Profit:

You can’t sell junk food to kids living with both married parents eating home-cooked fare.

Football matches used to be a lot cheaper and had white, native players. Beer used to be cheaper and better. Clothes used to be non-plastic and retain a shape. You’ve lost everything your sex used to value. What happened to the trades? The technical colleges? The pubs?

The list goes on, classism feeds into it. Grow the poor with their feeblest like the reverse of making a thoroughbred, how they organise their own class breeding. You end up with fat Americans in a walmart blubbering along oohing and aahing in the playmobil mobile.

You were betrayed by your fellow man, women have got shit to do with that. We were often banned outright from those positions, it’s literally impossible. The main qualification was a dick, IQ didn’t matter to you, Mr Boys Club “have you met my shitbag of a son?“, so you kinda deserve this. If you wanna bring up YKW, well, Cromwell invited them back in. This blindspot shows how dumb the average white nationalist is.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/top-ranked-iq-nations-by-continent/

Run the numbers.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/typical-asian-iq-lower-than-whites/

None of you wanna bring in anti-nepotism law that requires the hire was of AVERAGE competence for the role.

(whispers) average

or this shit happens

average

This saccharine naive libertarian “my fellow male would never betray me” – when competition and deceit is THE point of capitalism! THE point! The only one!

That’s the pleasant theoretical version, actual volume is worse.

After WW2 in particular, the remaining men (most undeserving cowards, frauds etc) were left a plethora of women to breed with. These military restrictions are r-selected and treasonous to national interests.

No coincidence their children were druggy hippies. Quelle surprise. The shittiest cultural movement in human history. To match the biggest dysgenic cull 20-30 years prior.

I posted this before as “where did all the good men go?” dead, mostly.

A gamma at this point would pipe up: why not the women?

Well, women didn’t evolve to fight, for one. It’s fairer to force 50yo Harold than 20yo Cindy Lou.

Ultimately, it must be this way around though, since men can’t butt heads like rams anymore to sexually compete or duel, the civilized equivalent (that gangs, sports, the gym seek to emulate, weakly).

Bringing back duelling to the death between two consenting parties (like boxing minus gloves) would have the same eugenic effect on a smaller scale. It’s a check and balance also backed by the death penalty for various heinous crimes, that also, wouldn’t you know it, was taken off the books by weaklings.

Rules in sport prevent death – but that is the purpose of sport. Today, only narcissists enter sport, knowing they will not die. Further, they get to bully and ‘fight’ aka play fight, like a child. There are fewer restraints on children fighting, think about that. We also mix the schools to blur gender, so weak boys can hit girls. That sounds like a society that can recover its civilization. Men also had all sorts of evolved responses in a fight, many male animals try to tear or bite one another’s nuts off. I can’t imagine many ‘well hard’ MMA bitches wanting to enter a ring if THAT were an option.

But that’s a real fight. There are no rules, except try not to die.

The modern Olympics is a joke, people went to watch the athletes compete, really compete, which means possibly die.

Women have fake tits, men have fake balls. That’s why modern women don’t respect gym bros. Even gym girls cheat on them. That’s why. Boys with sometimes implanted muscles or chemically fake muscles who’d shriek like a bitch if you ‘broke the rules’.

What rules? Real fighting has no sodding rules, nancy boy. Go back even to the 1950s and they’d all be considered flaming effeminate cuntmuffins. They’re all ponces in their little shorts with their waxed chest and homoerotic bragging. Why don’t women want kids anymore? Well… look at the options.

I asked a military bloke if he wanted to go running: “nah, it’s too cold.”

There was a light drizzle and it was about 12C. That counts as warm here.

I tried to take the piss and the excuse was ‘he couldn’t get sick’. Sure. Fucking sure.

A lot of these sports people are fake outdoorsy, they’re scared of rain and cold.

No coincidence they move from colder places to LA or Australia. Bloody wimps.

‘but what about the women?’ – gammas who imagine women have it easy because they’re really that dumb

The low IQ women don’t breed anyway, either because no man wants to marry it (in civilized places where marriage happens before spawn) or because their stupidity kills their kids with the wrong food or neglect (r-parenting, including abortion).

Peterson tells you half the truth, that’s the rest.

What do we do with the dipshits?

Good question. Don’t mention most of them are men, that demo might get triggered.

Past a certain point of genetic deterioration and cultural degeneration, even the lowliest woman will calculate men are too weak to even risk breeding with. They wait until after the next cull – if not war, famine, disease etc. like a capitalist retaining their productivity under socialism. EXACTLY like that, it’s the other sex’s method of preservation of energy.  Look at the surveys predicting (women hoping) everything gets worse. For a ‘baby boom’ you need a war first to sweep out the dregs of men, that’s a rule of history and this is why.

Eliminate outgroup race (30-40% in some areas), from that remainder then eliminate other religions or no religion (90%) and then not mental (50% or so remaining probably on meds that hide their psychotic tendencies) and who is left?

That’s without looking into high IQ (105+) because the past two generations either aborted to afford a few more holidays or they never found marriage material dating back to the post-WW2 shit tier bullshit.

You killed the golden goose. Globalization is a horseman in better threads.

This kinda shit annoys me because it isn’t Gen X/Y/Z’s actual fault.

Credit: Master Brew

Kids cost too much! We’re already funding immigrant ones! Plus lazy retirees! Plus foreign aid! We can barely afford rent! Still, I see birth rate memes.

How’s about pro-marriage memes for men?

The controlled ops wouldn’t like that, would probably fill it with mixed couples or IVFs. Therein lies the problem. How many of you arseholes have actually sat down and read the Race Relations Act? US or UK? That’s when the SJWs won. When you cannot legally walk away. That document cements forced multiculturalism aka white genocide.

Below a certain level, I don’t think an adult can actually BE a parent, yet we don’t require an IQ test for a breeding license because feefees. Human rights are granted automatically at 18, even if their mental age is always 14.

Aw, but morons who believe in man cards don’t want to be objectively independently tested, we’re meant to just trust their word they’re superior yet oppressed! Bring back SATs, FFS, before it’s too late!

Blame women for the dropping white male brain size compared to Asians, while you’re at it!

Is it our fault you lost fifty units of brain size over a few generations?

This is what happens when you fund the prosperity of the competition. You weaken the ingroup, it’s zero sum.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/03/we-need-national-capitalism/

Upsetting idiots or a future, pick one.

Especially broflakes feefees online, where they’re all magically 130IQ but can’t construct a sentence where I don’t wish to scratch my eyes out. Shoot teachers who help students cheat, I’m serious. Do you want a dense surgeon or a thicko pilot? If education is serious, cheating it is cheating society aka treason. Meritocracy requires you punish cheats severely.

A child can just be punished by omission aka permanent record, nobody will hire, booted out of school.

NO bailouts.

No “oh my Bobby’s a rebel” bullshit from weak patriarchs.

THAT is real nationalism, a tight ship.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/09/09/memoryholed-iq-science/

A purely “white is right” West has never existed because it would’ve been swarmed by its own idiots long before any success. There need to be strong discussions of what to do with the subhuman (neurologically, that’s what low IQ is, like a brain atavism from genetic load, their brain never completes adult development) in our own populations (certainly no incentives or celebrations!) and those we imported from the hillbilly nations of Europe e.g. Poland, with their child thieves and mother-whores bankrupting the NHS maternity wards at “fellow white’s” existential expense.

YOU have to live with this.

We have a dysgenic breeding pool, a eugenic economy, open borders, high crime and a huge debt state.

This won’t end pleasantly.

But fine – ignore me. Fine by me. No skin off my nose.

I’ve been saying this shit for literally years.

Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’. The neocolonialism as BPS explained, of buying up properties in another homeland (r-migration for resources).

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

Click to access is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

Patriarchy hates bachelors

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/11/23/bachelor-tax/

Always has done, always will.
It was a wealth tax on those who inherited from their family but refused their family’s wishes to continue the line, spitting on generations of sacrifice.

“Single, footloose, and fancy-free, the bachelor life is often portrayed as an ideal existence.”
Only in the 60s. Look how they turned out.
Historically, they were objects of pity and vice.
“For 2,000 years, bachelor taxes have periodically appeared in societies across the world, targeting single, childless men who were thought to be a useful source of revenue.”
No, they owed their family children (the purpose for their own birth) and, not being able to press the matter of family lineage, it was a useful incentive for the useless pajama boys of their age alongside tying inheritance to making a ‘good match’ and delivering at least one heir. Would you object to that too? Or should we further encourage the aptly named trust fund babies?
A single man doesn’t need a husband and father’s income. They’re spoiled brats who, if they did marry, would ‘marry their mother.’ It’s a good thing the difficult genes are seldom passed on.
They don’t even have to risk death in giving birth unlike the woman, it’s like refusing the draft. (Which bachelors often did, childish).
“In 9 AD, the Roman Emperor Augustus levied the ‘Lex Papia Poppaea’, which imposed a tax on single men and married couples who did not have children.”
Husbands who ‘prevented’ their wife’s fertility, in the latter case.
What about the Spartans?
They were successful because bachelors were considered like children. No responsibility was expected because they were incapable, too soft for it. As such, they were disrespected but at least not slaves.
“The purpose of the tax was to encourage marriage and procreation and to prevent immoral behavior.” They owe society by virtue of being in it, neglecting their duties to the nation – they’re funding, among other things, the women who cannot provide children because they refuse to marry. That’s a direct loss of population to the state.
If they didn’t like it, they could have left.
It was unpatriotic to be single for selfish reasons.
That’s bloody why.
The old wisdom is also coming back on the subject but the West can afford to drop back to its normal pre-WW populations, as long as its resources and infrastructure are not strained by immigration and foreign ‘aid’. We aren’t responsible for the world.
Look at Italy, picture how much better off they’d be now if they imposed a bachelor tax in the 50s.
I heard an old wives’ tale (untrue) that anyone who doesn’t want children, whatsoever, in an earlier era of less medical intervention, would have been destined to die as one, and that was Nature’s way of addressing the fate neatly, just one generation down. Funny how these stories explain things in the fatalistic manner. The impulse to have a healthy, happy family is connected to survival instinct and does frequently diminish in the sickly or traumatized. You could say a lot of modern men are traumatized by the modern world of globalization that forces them to financially compete with the world – so they can never afford a housewife. At minimum, they’re stressed by global concerns. I’d like to see studies on paternal instinct but the bitter segment of bachelors (and they do exist) would cry about it.
“In 1695, when the English Crown was struggling to raise capital for yet another expensive war with France, a bachelor tax was imposed to generate income. This law, known as the Marriage Duty Act, placed a fixed tax on all single men over the age of 25.”
A luxury tax, since you’d have to be rich to afford it. Taxing playboys is a national right, they’re a bad influence. Look how they ruined London. There goes the neighborhood.
Basically it was a eugenic tax on the dead-ends.
It worked.
“Bachelor taxes could also be used to regulate population growth. In South Africa, in 1919, a tax was imposed on bachelors in order to encourage white families to have children, a policy rooted in pre-apartheid racial politics and born out of fears that the white population would soon be eclipsed by the black community.”
No comment.
“In other cases, however, the bachelor tax was more about imposing moral order on society in a time of heightened panic about the hedonistic behavior of young single men.”
They were right…? The degeneracy of today is fueled by vain male demand.
Shut down the porn industry and women might listen. You can’t complain women are showing more skin without complaining about the billboards of lingerie models viewed by toddlers, sex scenes in minors’ films and free porn viewed by five-year olds online because age restrictions and checks would be a mild inconvenience to adults. They know about the brain damage of various vices, they don’t care to ban it. Why would anyone take them seriously? You must also complain about the double standards, like men walking around topless at gyms. We don’t actually want to see that. Plus it’s homoerotic. Sets a bad example.
“Many men complained that such an initiative was an intolerable form of gender discrimination, questioning why men ought to be singled out for extra taxation and not women.”

Men were bitching about muh sexism for decades first.
Broflakes. Men were the ones to propose, duh. It was a one-sided choice.
Plus the men were splashing the cash in illegal avenues difficult to trace (mobs).
Unmarried men only caused trouble to civilized society.
They still do.
Everyone complains about the marriage rate but never gets on the case of men who could marry but refuse.
It reminds me of Leonardo DiCaprio and how he rails against pollution while flying a private jet.
The men bitching about low marriage and birth rates in a personal way can’t be hypocrites, either marry or shut up.
Why don’t they just…? Well, why don’t you?

It’s a valid question, you begged it.

~mic drop~

If you’re rejecting your own gender role, that’s one potential wife you deprive of hers.
They sound like old women, traditionally the ones trying to force marriages.
With such paternalism, and that’s what it is, they must get married or get over it.
The worst are the bad husbands you see online, avoiding their family to lecture others on why they’re single.
Well… people like that. People who shouldn’t have married but wanted the status to browbeat others.
“More successful initiatives appeared at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century. The arguments that prevailed during these debates often centered on the behavior of single men, and the perceived need to coax men into marriage.”
All they had to do was shut the gin shops and brothels.
Make the manwhores leave the country, where they can’t be a bad influence on the native and naive.
The old-fashioned attitude was lynching for seduction.
“Opponents of the bill, however, suggested that if the bachelor tax were to stand, then a similar tax needed to be imposed on all women of marriageable age who had refused marriage proposals.”
This is hilarious. That would be fine?

Single men really don’t understand women, do they?
No woman would refuse a proposal from a man she was seriously courting.
However, to make it fair, men should be taxed according to the number of women they proposed to (including false promises and ex-wives) without a successful match.
Just punish the r-types until they move abroad, it’s very simple.
“In addition to this, in 1934, the state of California proposed a $25 bachelor tax, primarily as a strategy to boost the state’s falling birth rate. However, the proposals were not taken forward and the bill was never actually implemented.”
And look how well they’re doing!


This is like the elusive search for an atheist society that didn’t die out.
Such taxes will come back in the age of impossible unfunded pension liabilities.
Not might, must.
Why should they be entitled to live off other people’s children?
Why do you think the Boomers felt safe to abort their children? Social Security!
Then there’s the contribution to moral decay.
It’s funny how the very men who complain loudly about “degeneracy” also drink, smoke, fornicate, gamble and attend “massage parlors”.

We are not fooled.

What about a broad Hypocrite Tax?
Nobody could object.
That’d bring back the honor culture you so desire.
If you wouldn’t want an establishment opening next to a school, why is it allowed in your society at all?
At least make all of it underground and difficult to access. Don’t glamorize it.

It would make more sense to give all bachelors free vasectomies and make them sign a document that they’ll never ask the public to fund their sexual healthcare.
They won’t take you up on it though, r-types enjoy the idea of reproductive abuse.
They are the creeps who remove condoms against consent and don’t think of themselves as rapists.
Actually why aren’t there more child support cases about that? Most women are not on the Pill. Deliberate STD infection is a crime too. One very chiseled actor was in a Canadian court about that. Sometimes misogyny is obvious.

Traditionally, it was known rapists wanted to steal fertility* without the male investment of marriage. Why isn’t it assumed that producing such a child was an act of rape? Especially if the mother expressly didn’t want it? I’m sure we’ll come back to that legal position again soon, by necessity.

*or else they’d favour non-reproductive sex

I guess we could tattoo their forehead with a B for bachelor.
So they can’t lie to women about their intentions.

Socialist shortages in the NHS

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/last-year-worst-ever-nhs-medicines-shortages-expert/

Who could’ve predicted that socialism might fail?

I notice they haven’t studied whether the race you are impacts how much treatment you get. I’ve noticed white people being denied various things (by non-white doctors, usually) but rolling out the red carpet for anyone swarthier than tan (especially if they’re from the same country, then they throw everything in the book at them).

The NHS will be killed by the nepotism of giving out expensive treatments to people who don’t need it like candies.

R-types literally believe in endless resources, availability never ends.

Places like India have Third World health because of doctor nepotism.

We live in a society (yes, going there) where we fund all the whore pills, abortions and STD antibiotics a little degenerate’s heart desires but god help you if you’ve got a non-sexual infection or cancer, then you’re suddenly low priority. Why fund a child’s cancer treatment, we need to give the local club manwhore a fuckton of free “sexual health” services because he refuses to wear a condom! Let the WW2 veteran die in a corridor on a waiting list because some irresponsible slattern wants her third abortion.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11844314/Thousands-of-cancer-patients-to-be-denied-treatment.html

Seriously. Why are sexual health concerns given unwarranted priority?

The NHS should care about patients over PR.

https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/womens-health/how-common-are-repeat-abortions/5045092.article

How is that ethical?

PC medicine is bad medicine. People must be held responsible for deliberately making their health poor again and again and again and again, at least to prioritize people who didn’t choose their situation.

For example, a diet of curries will cause a lot of health problems. Why isn’t this medical fact common knowledge? It isn’t PC to ‘shame’ people for…. provoking known disease in their bodies. That’s also a factor in earlier male deaths in India, by the way. Mainly as a leading cause of male obesity, look around. Does lying help them live longer? No but it allows the system the excuse to expand and become more toxic on the host society.

https://www.indiatimes.com/health/healthyliving/gastronomical-problems-spicy-food-and-the-explosive-effect-238724.html

Stop swallowing propaganda.

The NHS isn’t free, it’s taxpayer funded and doesn’t even provide full coverage (to foreigners reading, they frequently deny service, which as you can guess is often politically motivated).

If anyone else charged for a service then failed to fully provide it, they’d be arrested. Not Our NHS!

If you speak of their “professionals”, that decapitate babies, in anything less than saintly tones, you’re an evil bigot.

BUT – there’s nothing to complain about, is there, here take these happy pills! You don’t need them though!

Our death pathways are the envy of the world – if by world you mean Hitler’s Germany.

Health “care” is newspeak. 

We even have Death Panels deciding who deserves to live and die! So proud.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2080817/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Europe

The best system in Europe by outcomes is the Netherlands so don’t swallow the propaganda because they have a free system of choice but have to buy personal insurance (which makes more sense than paying for some stranger’s ambiguous coverage and having uncertain coverage for your own situation and further, funding “treatments” you find pure evil).

Picture the medicine shortage as the economy goes sideways with correction.

What cannot last, won’t.