Global Trends, Europe

2018:

Promising other people’s money is slavery.

Fuck you, champagne socialists.

The Guardian academia protests about ‘muh pensions’ won’t be the half of it. You didn’t earn a pension, Rome fell by making them non-military too. Public pensions are a myth to compel obedience from these useful idiots.

Being sustainable actually = national sustainability and avoiding over-breeding beyond food security and other needs. K-selection, not the promising of fiat gibs.

Caps from:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/771309/Global_Strategic_Trends_-_The_Future_Starts_Today.pdf

search food, meat, protein, China

just have fun

“Immigration could offset population declines in Europe”

and they show a photo of Muslims.

EU growth since 2000: 17% against the world average of 47%

Yes, let’s leave the Marxists in charge of everything.

They actually think the GDP will be the same with more Muslims and declining native population, with it declining national IQ.

Because we’re all interchangeable cogs, right?

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is death.

You cannot make accurate predictions with this. GDP is best predicted by national IQ,

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/the-smart-fraction-theory-of-iq-and-the-wealth-of-nations/

“the value 0.73 actually underestimates the strength of the relationship”

so the racial genocide replacement politely called ‘demographic change’ will cause national IQ to decline and with it, GDP. Even less revenue than now, idiots.

Run the bloody numbers.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

Not that we’re avoiding ((debt)) even now.

They actually think GDP is a constant though, like the Sun rising in the East, it just happens.

Nobody takes extra hours because the tax system is fairer or wants to work hard as a virtue, no. No effort, just rely on it.

They actually think this. R-types do not understand resource scarcity or how hard it is to build up resources. They are infinite, in their minds.

They want to replace you. Remember this when they’re begging to be saved by random white people.

No appeal to white guilt, thank you. #Notyourwhitesavior 

The EU needs us, our military, as previously covered.

They can’t get a federal Europe until we feel threatened enough to sign up.

They also screech about fascism without using the word.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/04/30/fascism-historically/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/17/told-ya-so-eu-army-forced/

All you need is one damn book to understand this better than the MOD:

The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics

Who would win?

 

MOD budget versus $6.99.

From the smart fraction post:

Thus, for a technologically sophisticated society, SFT asserts that a nation’s per capita GDP is determined by the population fraction with IQ greater than or equal to some threshold IQ. Consistent with the data of Lynn and Vanhanen, that threshold IQ is 108, a bit less than the minimum required for what used to be a bachelor’s degree. Figure 3 illustrates the fit of (3) to the data of Lynn and Vanhanen.

Dysgenics kills GDP.

Your immigration policy will starve you, State, for importing voter leeches.

They find about 70% of the variance in IQ is associated with genetic variation. Bouchard et al, Science, Oct 12, 1990, present an excellent review of these studies.”

Know thy HBD or die.

Controlling thus for environmental factors, Murray found earnings stratified conspicuously by IQ.

There is much more, Estraneo, but two nails are sufficient to fix the direction of a one-way sign. The arrow of cause points mostly from IQ to income, and not the other way round.”

The eugenic economy

More than 15% of the population are literally useless.

This won’t end well.

Most of this hovering percentage (depending where you draw the line, with machine replacement) are male.

Society has no answer for this. There is no logical way to pander to them and save society from the thing sinking it aka them.

Einstein really hated white men, because the public introduction of nukes (muh publication and global display) has made it so we can’t cull our own useless eaters (the angry gamma types that hate authority, women and standards).

This is the death sentence of not cutting out cancer because it’s technically your own cells.

That’s what this has done. This is the start of dysgenics, nothing else.

I’m sure cancer cells would call for Muh Loyalty so the Titanic doesn’t patch its own hull and bail out water.

Breeding only comes a while after considerations of birth (i.e. the fact you must be born to be a parental candidate). Regression to the mean also pummels every population. This isn’t a one-time sweep.

Gammas: “muh right side of the bell curve!”

About that: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/05/21/iq-results-between-the-sexes-the-problem/

Here’s one study they cherry-pick:

A grand total of two points. Don’t build your spaceships to escape the cooties just yet.”

And even there, look at the other half. Literally. Everything to the left of 1SD.

“When it comes to geniuses, these guys are trying to claim they’re Einstein by association.
That is retarded. Claim to be Hercules at least, he was male too. Aim high in your delusion.”

They hate authority because, being too stupid to be able to complete instructions, they assume the instructor hates them. They hate women because we’re sensitive to avoid any indicator of retarded offspring (ultimate waste of investment, more than being barren and caring for relatives). They hate standards because they know, deep down, in any society they’d be inferior and it would be out of reach. This makes them spiteful e.g. the anti-merit of barring women from colleges when they qualify. If you really think women are dumber, what do you care if you’d get in? Logically, they’d want weaker aka dumber people as their competition (why white SJWs want non-white SJWs in college). They think everyone cheats (college scandal) because they have to. Academia is now run by cheats (replication crisis) and its reputation under conservatives is no longer present.

This will lead to dystopia, which we’re already seeing moderately ripe fruits of.

They feel threatened by anyone because everyone is, statistically, an intellectual threat.

This explains chimp-outs at completely normal people and whatever the white version is, the mantrum?

The omegas are quiet and fine, the classic manual labourers.  They mix the drinks, pick the food, clean the guns. Gammas have delusions of grandeur (supported by equalism) and when they fail, they’re the revenge fantasists. The low IQ/aggression link comes through there.

The SJWism started in the military when they forgot their purpose – cull the people society cannot feed.

This no below-X requirement is convenient for SJWs, who tend to be lower on the IQ scale themselves and oddly fearful of a draft that hasn’t happened since the last century.

The military have been pussies since world wars one and two, when, wouldn’t you know it, men started to go soft.

Yeah, because you practiced a dysgenic cull. In war, there’s always a cull. Introducing exemptions on age or fitness or IQ or mental malingering or having Daddy Moneybags will kill the country more surely than the cause.

Men went weak because of this. They over-compensate now with machines, all the gadgets in the world won’t help when your national IQ is declining. America needed Operation Paperclip or we’d all be speaking Russian now, because those non-white poor huddled masses from the previous 50 years had overbred.

Zero sum funding, the smart or the stupid. All the money to ‘rehabilitate’ criminals, to prison PS4s, to the translator in a primary school is money away from real art, real culture, real innovation, actual intelligence. It is costing you already.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/24/link-iq-and-standard-of-living/

Dumb men being arse-covered by greedy ones. There are far, far more male criminals, aren’t there?

In terms of a genetic product, that is a quality issue. The SJWs sense this but draw the wrong conclusions. We already have touchy-feely men, they’re in politics keeping the stupid mass of men going, for fun and profit.

Fun: anti-fa.

Profit:

You can’t sell junk food to kids living with both married parents eating home-cooked fare.

Football matches used to be a lot cheaper and had white, native players. Beer used to be cheaper and better. Clothes used to be non-plastic and retain a shape. You’ve lost everything your sex used to value. What happened to the trades? The technical colleges? The pubs?

The list goes on, classism feeds into it. Grow the poor with their feeblest like the reverse of making a thoroughbred, how they organise their own class breeding. You end up with fat Americans in a walmart blubbering along oohing and aahing in the playmobil mobile.

You were betrayed by your fellow man, women have got shit to do with that. We were often banned outright from those positions, it’s literally impossible. The main qualification was a dick, IQ didn’t matter to you, Mr Boys Club “have you met my shitbag of a son?“, so you kinda deserve this. If you wanna bring up YKW, well, Cromwell invited them back in. This blindspot shows how dumb the average white nationalist is.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/top-ranked-iq-nations-by-continent/

Run the numbers.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/typical-asian-iq-lower-than-whites/

None of you wanna bring in anti-nepotism law that requires the hire was of AVERAGE competence for the role.

(whispers) average

or this shit happens

average

This saccharine naive libertarian “my fellow male would never betray me” – when competition and deceit is THE point of capitalism! THE point! The only one!

That’s the pleasant theoretical version, actual volume is worse.

After WW2 in particular, the remaining men (most undeserving cowards, frauds etc) were left a plethora of women to breed with. These military restrictions are r-selected and treasonous to national interests.

No coincidence their children were druggy hippies. Quelle surprise. The shittiest cultural movement in human history. To match the biggest dysgenic cull 20-30 years prior.

I posted this before as “where did all the good men go?” dead, mostly.

A gamma at this point would pipe up: why not the women?

Well, women didn’t evolve to fight, for one. It’s fairer to force 50yo Harold than 20yo Cindy Lou.

Ultimately, it must be this way around though, since men can’t butt heads like rams anymore to sexually compete or duel, the civilized equivalent (that gangs, sports, the gym seek to emulate, weakly).

Bringing back duelling to the death between two consenting parties (like boxing minus gloves) would have the same eugenic effect on a smaller scale. It’s a check and balance also backed by the death penalty for various heinous crimes, that also, wouldn’t you know it, was taken off the books by weaklings.

Rules in sport prevent death – but that is the purpose of sport. Today, only narcissists enter sport, knowing they will not die. Further, they get to bully and ‘fight’ aka play fight, like a child. There are fewer restraints on children fighting, think about that. We also mix the schools to blur gender, so weak boys can hit girls. That sounds like a society that can recover its civilization. Men also had all sorts of evolved responses in a fight, many male animals try to tear or bite one another’s nuts off. I can’t imagine many ‘well hard’ MMA bitches wanting to enter a ring if THAT were an option.

But that’s a real fight. There are no rules, except try not to die.

The modern Olympics is a joke, people went to watch the athletes compete, really compete, which means possibly die.

Women have fake tits, men have fake balls. That’s why modern women don’t respect gym bros. Even gym girls cheat on them. That’s why. Boys with sometimes implanted muscles or chemically fake muscles who’d shriek like a bitch if you ‘broke the rules’.

What rules? Real fighting has no sodding rules, nancy boy. Go back even to the 1950s and they’d all be considered flaming effeminate cuntmuffins. They’re all ponces in their little shorts with their waxed chest and homoerotic bragging. Why don’t women want kids anymore? Well… look at the options.

I asked a military bloke if he wanted to go running: “nah, it’s too cold.”

There was a light drizzle and it was about 12C. That counts as warm here.

I tried to take the piss and the excuse was ‘he couldn’t get sick’. Sure. Fucking sure.

A lot of these sports people are fake outdoorsy, they’re scared of rain and cold.

No coincidence they move from colder places to LA or Australia. Bloody wimps.

‘but what about the women?’ – gammas who imagine women have it easy because they’re really that dumb

The low IQ women don’t breed anyway, either because no man wants to marry it (in civilized places where marriage happens before spawn) or because their stupidity kills their kids with the wrong food or neglect (r-parenting, including abortion).

Peterson tells you half the truth, that’s the rest.

What do we do with the dipshits?

Good question. Don’t mention most of them are men, that demo might get triggered.

Past a certain point of genetic deterioration and cultural degeneration, even the lowliest woman will calculate men are too weak to even risk breeding with. They wait until after the next cull – if not war, famine, disease etc. like a capitalist retaining their productivity under socialism. EXACTLY like that, it’s the other sex’s method of preservation of energy.  Look at the surveys predicting (women hoping) everything gets worse. For a ‘baby boom’ you need a war first to sweep out the dregs of men, that’s a rule of history and this is why.

Eliminate outgroup race (30-40% in some areas), from that remainder then eliminate other religions or no religion (90%) and then not mental (50% or so remaining probably on meds that hide their psychotic tendencies) and who is left?

That’s without looking into high IQ (105+) because the past two generations either aborted to afford a few more holidays or they never found marriage material dating back to the post-WW2 shit tier bullshit.

You killed the golden goose. Globalization is a horseman in better threads.

This kinda shit annoys me because it isn’t Gen X/Y/Z’s actual fault.

Credit: Master Brew

Kids cost too much! We’re already funding immigrant ones! Plus lazy retirees! Plus foreign aid! We can barely afford rent! Still, I see birth rate memes.

How’s about pro-marriage memes for men?

The controlled ops wouldn’t like that, would probably fill it with mixed couples or IVFs. Therein lies the problem. How many of you arseholes have actually sat down and read the Race Relations Act? US or UK? That’s when the SJWs won. When you cannot legally walk away. That document cements forced multiculturalism aka white genocide.

Below a certain level, I don’t think an adult can actually BE a parent, yet we don’t require an IQ test for a breeding license because feefees. Human rights are granted automatically at 18, even if their mental age is always 14.

Aw, but morons who believe in man cards don’t want to be objectively independently tested, we’re meant to just trust their word they’re superior yet oppressed! Bring back SATs, FFS, before it’s too late!

Blame women for the dropping white male brain size compared to Asians, while you’re at it!

Is it our fault you lost fifty units of brain size over a few generations?

This is what happens when you fund the prosperity of the competition. You weaken the ingroup, it’s zero sum.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/03/we-need-national-capitalism/

Upsetting idiots or a future, pick one.

Especially broflakes feefees online, where they’re all magically 130IQ but can’t construct a sentence where I don’t wish to scratch my eyes out. Shoot teachers who help students cheat, I’m serious. Do you want a dense surgeon or a thicko pilot? If education is serious, cheating it is cheating society aka treason. Meritocracy requires you punish cheats severely.

A child can just be punished by omission aka permanent record, nobody will hire, booted out of school.

NO bailouts.

No “oh my Bobby’s a rebel” bullshit from weak patriarchs.

THAT is real nationalism, a tight ship.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/09/09/memoryholed-iq-science/

A purely “white is right” West has never existed because it would’ve been swarmed by its own idiots long before any success. There need to be strong discussions of what to do with the subhuman (neurologically, that’s what low IQ is, like a brain atavism from genetic load, their brain never completes adult development) in our own populations (certainly no incentives or celebrations!) and those we imported from the hillbilly nations of Europe e.g. Poland, with their child thieves and mother-whores bankrupting the NHS maternity wards at “fellow white’s” existential expense.

YOU have to live with this.

We have a dysgenic breeding pool, a eugenic economy, open borders, high crime and a huge debt state.

This won’t end pleasantly.

But fine – ignore me. Fine by me. No skin off my nose.

I’ve been saying this shit for literally years.

Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’. The neocolonialism as BPS explained, of buying up properties in another homeland (r-migration for resources).

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

https://www.cement.org/docs/default-source/fc_concrete_technology/durability/is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

Patriarchy hates bachelors

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/11/23/bachelor-tax/

Always has done, always will.
It was a wealth tax on those who inherited from their family but refused their family’s wishes to continue the line, spitting on generations of sacrifice.

“Single, footloose, and fancy-free, the bachelor life is often portrayed as an ideal existence.”
Only in the 60s. Look how they turned out.
Historically, they were objects of pity and vice.
“For 2,000 years, bachelor taxes have periodically appeared in societies across the world, targeting single, childless men who were thought to be a useful source of revenue.”
No, they owed their family children (the purpose for their own birth) and, not being able to press the matter of family lineage, it was a useful incentive for the useless pajama boys of their age alongside tying inheritance to making a ‘good match’ and delivering at least one heir. Would you object to that too? Or should we further encourage the aptly named trust fund babies?
A single man doesn’t need a husband and father’s income. They’re spoiled brats who, if they did marry, would ‘marry their mother.’ It’s a good thing the difficult genes are seldom passed on.
They don’t even have to risk death in giving birth unlike the woman, it’s like refusing the draft. (Which bachelors often did, childish).
“In 9 AD, the Roman Emperor Augustus levied the ‘Lex Papia Poppaea’, which imposed a tax on single men and married couples who did not have children.”
Husbands who ‘prevented’ their wife’s fertility, in the latter case.
What about the Spartans?
They were successful because bachelors were considered like children. No responsibility was expected because they were incapable, too soft for it. As such, they were disrespected but at least not slaves.
“The purpose of the tax was to encourage marriage and procreation and to prevent immoral behavior.” They owe society by virtue of being in it, neglecting their duties to the nation – they’re funding, among other things, the women who cannot provide children because they refuse to marry. That’s a direct loss of population to the state.
If they didn’t like it, they could have left.
It was unpatriotic to be single for selfish reasons.
That’s bloody why.
The old wisdom is also coming back on the subject but the West can afford to drop back to its normal pre-WW populations, as long as its resources and infrastructure are not strained by immigration and foreign ‘aid’. We aren’t responsible for the world.
Look at Italy, picture how much better off they’d be now if they imposed a bachelor tax in the 50s.
I heard an old wives’ tale (untrue) that anyone who doesn’t want children, whatsoever, in an earlier era of less medical intervention, would have been destined to die as one, and that was Nature’s way of addressing the fate neatly, just one generation down. Funny how these stories explain things in the fatalistic manner. The impulse to have a healthy, happy family is connected to survival instinct and does frequently diminish in the sickly or traumatized. You could say a lot of modern men are traumatized by the modern world of globalization that forces them to financially compete with the world – so they can never afford a housewife. At minimum, they’re stressed by global concerns. I’d like to see studies on paternal instinct but the bitter segment of bachelors (and they do exist) would cry about it.
“In 1695, when the English Crown was struggling to raise capital for yet another expensive war with France, a bachelor tax was imposed to generate income. This law, known as the Marriage Duty Act, placed a fixed tax on all single men over the age of 25.”
A luxury tax, since you’d have to be rich to afford it. Taxing playboys is a national right, they’re a bad influence. Look how they ruined London. There goes the neighborhood.
Basically it was a eugenic tax on the dead-ends.
It worked.
“Bachelor taxes could also be used to regulate population growth. In South Africa, in 1919, a tax was imposed on bachelors in order to encourage white families to have children, a policy rooted in pre-apartheid racial politics and born out of fears that the white population would soon be eclipsed by the black community.”
No comment.
“In other cases, however, the bachelor tax was more about imposing moral order on society in a time of heightened panic about the hedonistic behavior of young single men.”
They were right…? The degeneracy of today is fueled by vain male demand.
Shut down the porn industry and women might listen. You can’t complain women are showing more skin without complaining about the billboards of lingerie models viewed by toddlers, sex scenes in minors’ films and free porn viewed by five-year olds online because age restrictions and checks would be a mild inconvenience to adults. They know about the brain damage of various vices, they don’t care to ban it. Why would anyone take them seriously? You must also complain about the double standards, like men walking around topless at gyms. We don’t actually want to see that. Plus it’s homoerotic. Sets a bad example.
“Many men complained that such an initiative was an intolerable form of gender discrimination, questioning why men ought to be singled out for extra taxation and not women.”

Men were bitching about muh sexism for decades first.
Broflakes. Men were the ones to propose, duh. It was a one-sided choice.
Plus the men were splashing the cash in illegal avenues difficult to trace (mobs).
Unmarried men only caused trouble to civilized society.
They still do.
Everyone complains about the marriage rate but never gets on the case of men who could marry but refuse.
It reminds me of Leonardo DiCaprio and how he rails against pollution while flying a private jet.
The men bitching about low marriage and birth rates in a personal way can’t be hypocrites, either marry or shut up.
Why don’t they just…? Well, why don’t you?

It’s a valid question, you begged it.

~mic drop~

If you’re rejecting your own gender role, that’s one potential wife you deprive of hers.
They sound like old women, traditionally the ones trying to force marriages.
With such paternalism, and that’s what it is, they must get married or get over it.
The worst are the bad husbands you see online, avoiding their family to lecture others on why they’re single.
Well… people like that. People who shouldn’t have married but wanted the status to browbeat others.
“More successful initiatives appeared at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century. The arguments that prevailed during these debates often centered on the behavior of single men, and the perceived need to coax men into marriage.”
All they had to do was shut the gin shops and brothels.
Make the manwhores leave the country, where they can’t be a bad influence on the native and naive.
The old-fashioned attitude was lynching for seduction.
“Opponents of the bill, however, suggested that if the bachelor tax were to stand, then a similar tax needed to be imposed on all women of marriageable age who had refused marriage proposals.”
This is hilarious. That would be fine?

Single men really don’t understand women, do they?
No woman would refuse a proposal from a man she was seriously courting.
However, to make it fair, men should be taxed according to the number of women they proposed to (including false promises and ex-wives) without a successful match.
Just punish the r-types until they move abroad, it’s very simple.
“In addition to this, in 1934, the state of California proposed a $25 bachelor tax, primarily as a strategy to boost the state’s falling birth rate. However, the proposals were not taken forward and the bill was never actually implemented.”
And look how well they’re doing!


This is like the elusive search for an atheist society that didn’t die out.
Such taxes will come back in the age of impossible unfunded pension liabilities.
Not might, must.
Why should they be entitled to live off other people’s children?
Why do you think the Boomers felt safe to abort their children? Social Security!
Then there’s the contribution to moral decay.
It’s funny how the very men who complain loudly about “degeneracy” also drink, smoke, fornicate, gamble and attend “massage parlors”.

We are not fooled.

What about a broad Hypocrite Tax?
Nobody could object.
That’d bring back the honor culture you so desire.
If you wouldn’t want an establishment opening next to a school, why is it allowed in your society at all?
At least make all of it underground and difficult to access. Don’t glamorize it.

It would make more sense to give all bachelors free vasectomies and make them sign a document that they’ll never ask the public to fund their sexual healthcare.
They won’t take you up on it though, r-types enjoy the idea of reproductive abuse.
They are the creeps who remove condoms against consent and don’t think of themselves as rapists.
Actually why aren’t there more child support cases about that? Most women are not on the Pill. Deliberate STD infection is a crime too. One very chiseled actor was in a Canadian court about that. Sometimes misogyny is obvious.

Traditionally, it was known rapists wanted to steal fertility* without the male investment of marriage. Why isn’t it assumed that producing such a child was an act of rape? Especially if the mother expressly didn’t want it? I’m sure we’ll come back to that legal position again soon, by necessity.

*or else they’d favour non-reproductive sex

I guess we could tattoo their forehead with a B for bachelor.
So they can’t lie to women about their intentions.

Socialist shortages in the NHS

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/last-year-worst-ever-nhs-medicines-shortages-expert/

Who could’ve predicted that socialism might fail?

I notice they haven’t studied whether the race you are impacts how much treatment you get. I’ve noticed white people being denied various things (by non-white doctors, usually) but rolling out the red carpet for anyone swarthier than tan (especially if they’re from the same country, then they throw everything in the book at them).

The NHS will be killed by the nepotism of giving out expensive treatments to people who don’t need it like candies.

R-types literally believe in endless resources, availability never ends.

Places like India have Third World health because of doctor nepotism.

We live in a society (yes, going there) where we fund all the whore pills, abortions and STD antibiotics a little degenerate’s heart desires but god help you if you’ve got a non-sexual infection or cancer, then you’re suddenly low priority. Why fund a child’s cancer treatment, we need to give the local club manwhore a fuckton of free “sexual health” services because he refuses to wear a condom! Let the WW2 veteran die in a corridor on a waiting list because some irresponsible slattern wants her third abortion.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11844314/Thousands-of-cancer-patients-to-be-denied-treatment.html

Seriously. Why are sexual health concerns given unwarranted priority?

The NHS should care about patients over PR.

https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/womens-health/how-common-are-repeat-abortions/5045092.article

How is that ethical?

PC medicine is bad medicine. People must be held responsible for deliberately making their health poor again and again and again and again, at least to prioritize people who didn’t choose their situation.

For example, a diet of curries will cause a lot of health problems. Why isn’t this medical fact common knowledge? It isn’t PC to ‘shame’ people for…. provoking known disease in their bodies. That’s also a factor in earlier male deaths in India, by the way. Mainly as a leading cause of male obesity, look around. Does lying help them live longer? No but it allows the system the excuse to expand and become more toxic on the host society.

https://www.indiatimes.com/health/healthyliving/gastronomical-problems-spicy-food-and-the-explosive-effect-238724.html

Stop swallowing propaganda.

The NHS isn’t free, it’s taxpayer funded and doesn’t even provide full coverage (to foreigners reading, they frequently deny service, which as you can guess is often politically motivated).

If anyone else charged for a service then failed to fully provide it, they’d be arrested. Not Our NHS!

If you speak of their “professionals”, that decapitate babies, in anything less than saintly tones, you’re an evil bigot.

BUT – there’s nothing to complain about, is there, here take these happy pills! You don’t need them though!

Our death pathways are the envy of the world – if by world you mean Hitler’s Germany.

Health “care” is newspeak. 

We even have Death Panels deciding who deserves to live and die! So proud.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2080817/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Europe

The best system in Europe by outcomes is the Netherlands so don’t swallow the propaganda because they have a free system of choice but have to buy personal insurance (which makes more sense than paying for some stranger’s ambiguous coverage and having uncertain coverage for your own situation and further, funding “treatments” you find pure evil).

Picture the medicine shortage as the economy goes sideways with correction.

What cannot last, won’t.

Video: Historical perspective

When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.

Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.

Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.

Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.

We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.

Correction:

If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.

That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)

The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?

http://www.parliament.scot/General%20Documents/CEYP_outcomes_06.16.pdf

Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890536/
The “care system” is systemic child abuse. I’m not being dramatic, I’m being scientific. It is a lifelong punishment without crime. Libertarians say nothing, for shame!

Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.

But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?

No, only if you wanted to sell them. 

Sorry, “financial incentives”.

We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.

Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?

*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.

Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).

Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?

Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).

Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned. What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?

Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.

A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.

So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.

Where is the logic here?

Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.

The state grows as the people wither.

** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).

The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.

The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.

It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!

At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!

They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.

That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.

Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)

These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.

They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.

Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!

This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.

You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!

Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.

MRAs need to make family courts public before any other legal changes can happen, idiots.

Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.

No court should be secret in a free society.

It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.

Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?

Stefan won’t touch this because he’s a coward.

[And America does it too. Land of the free (unless you’re a minor).
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/cwo
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/archive/cb/resource/report-congress-cw-financial-incentives ]

Global IQ drops

The pride of Christians replacing Natural Selection. You know better than God, right?

Fuck “mysterious ways”, sometimes you need to over-rule God’s will for feels!

And going into debt and producing unborn debt slaves to finance it, totally kosher!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_rob_Peter_to_pay_Paul

CHINOs hate Darwin because it shows their signalling is selfish, real Christians don’t really care. They aren’t pathological in their altruism so that theory is seen as obvious too.

If you look closely Jesus only fed believers who went on to be good people.

Now we don’t even have the Red Cross because they refused to take it bearing the symbol, it was changed locally to Red Crescent. If a beggar spat at your works, what would Jesus do?

People who hate the cross and all it stands for? BROTHER!

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/world_iq_going_down.html

h/t Anonymous Conservative

But dysgenics isn’t real, where’s the evidence?

Maybe one of the Horsemen is Bill Gates.

Don’t make the easy mistake. Don’t blame smart people for the decisions of stupid ones, place the blame where it belongs. As for blaming the women, well, how many are married? Who proposes? It takes two.

Europe is only responsible for Europe and we’re quite sustainable unlike – oh, literally EVERYONE ELSE.

Asia is a bigger pox on global IQ than Africa, if you crunch some numbers.

“My personal theory is that the drop in I.Q. is real and viral; that is, it is caused by an infection that is highly communicable through proximity.” HPV?

Genetic load would make sense if responsive to STDs.