Reproduction OR Immigration OR Bust

http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/23/reproduction-and-its-substitute/

Pick one.

…While there is a lot of starry-eyed prognostication about the replacement of people by machines, fundamentally,

the below average IQ will have nothing to do, it’s a disaster

economics is about trade between humans for their subjective satisfaction. When a culture produces fewer humans, and demands more of those younger humans in the form of taxes to support the older ones, some people need to be imported to make up the deficit.

“Need.”

However, the people that can be imported are not like those that would have reproduced under different conditions. Rather than reproducing the society that existed before, mass immigration instead produces a mutant amalgam that isn’t entirely recognizable to the native stock. The people have different values, different productivity levels, different behavioral propensities, different religions, and different genetics.

….What has happened is, that given the crude egalitarian ideology shared by most of the country, one person is held to be as good as any other, with no differences that can’t be melted away by education and television.

This is not true: a people can’t reproduce itself by importing some other people from some other place. They think that they’re getting reproduction, but are actually getting replacement. Not all of the replacements get along with one another, either — crude racial categories like ‘Hispanic’ can include different strains of humanity that have hated each other for centuries, speak a different dialect, and don’t particularly cooperate well…..

The phrase “community relations” springs to mind, within a nation there should be no division.

Feminism is defined as…

feminism

Actual definition. Oxford Dictionary definition.
Personal ‘definitions’ don’t mean shit, those are called opinions.

Maybe these people saying “educate yourselves” could pick up a copy of this magical book that defines things?

1. Subject = women. Only women.
2. ‘Rights’ = a nebulous concept involving an expansion of current powers.
3. Equality of the sexes = the pseudoscientific basis of feminism, based in Christianity and disproven by all known, harder sciences including genetics, physiology and the KO, neuroscience.

Together, these results suggest candidate regions for investigating the asymmetric effect that sex has on the developing brain, and for understanding sex-biased neurological and psychiatric conditions.

If feminism is science-positive, it should give up before this line of research continues and utterly decimates their cause by force.

Contrast with;

egalitarianism

1. Subject = all people. Women are no longer special.
2. Deserve equal rights (treatment, including responsibility).
3. Opportunities. Not outcomes.

Final example;

humanism

What is rationalism, you ask?

rationalism

The triumph of reason over experience.
That’s right, a humanist cannot, by definition, cite personal experience or belief at all.

Any fucking questions? I’m glad we had this little chat.

drinking tired of this shit michael fassbender

Government is your God

You appeal to it and beg it to solve your problems for you. You pray for long-sought proclamations to fell your enemies and appeal to its righteous authority when instated. There is nothing higher, you say. Its divinity cannot be revoked. Ah, but what of Revolutions? Never of Government you know, it must be the money. Money is the root of all evil, you misquote and lobby for your Government Gods to wreak vengeance on Wall Street for its believers. After all, we should be equal under God.

Some days I have trouble handling this amount of stupid