Corvée, internship slavery

https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/144/1/116/1441704?redirectedFrom=PDF

WHO ABOLISHED CORVEE LABOUR IN EGYPT AND WHY?

INTERNS BUILT DA PYRAMIDS!

Hey, better or worse than taxation of your (otherwise) savings? The Government just steals your personal profit from the profit of your labour. Is the tax percentage higher or lower than your savings one?*

Either way, you’re a slave!

That’s three ways, for those counting:

  1. debt (and collectors) – Future labour owed
  2. forced labour – Present labour demanded
  3. taxation confiscation (invented in the 19/20th centuries, for war only). – Past labour taken twice. The taxing labour itself (2) and then, as in a criminal punishment, a fine levied on the sacrosanct fruits of one’s individual labour.

For 1 and 3

http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/economy/taxation.htm

We wuz repossessed?

“The collection of taxes was often performed by coercion.”

Some things never change.

…whatever happened to consent, consent of the governed?

“Attempts were made to tax other parts of the population, and as one could hardly supervise everybody’s economic activities, Late Period Egyptians had to declare their income.”

https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/43966/were-jews-enslaved-by-egypt-or-instead-corvee-labor

If this is true, this may confirm, to him, his theory that Exodus Jews were also the “habiru”, buffer mercenaries of Egypt who became unmanageable & fearsome and were “set to labor” as corvee.

Essentially, he states that a transition from mercenary to outright slave is unlikely because there would undoubtedly be opposition, hastening the Exodus outcome.

Write a musical about it and people might give a shit.

Liberal example*

It doesn’t matter if you get 5% on your “savings”, if before that you lost 30% of your “earnings”.

Ancient Egyptians weren’t black

Unless you mean the slaves.

If only we had a field of scientific study to tell.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/archeology

https://uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801

Before white people invaded and since apartheid ended, Africa has had no excuse to be shit.

If they had a monarchy system, they might’ve had one King.

They’ve never had an Empire. Quite sad, actually. Every other race has.

They’re still trying to say raging tart Cleopatra wasn’t Greek.

Spot the Afro. I’m still waiting for the Poundland Princess to bring those back like a proud black woman.

Clues about Ancient Egyptian race

http://listverse.com/2015/05/10/10-intriguing-clues-about-ancient-egyptian-ethnicity/

There needs to be a distinction made between the population and the nobility/monarchy.

Nobody ever does in this topic.

Up until around the 19th century, the West referred to black people as meaning they had dark hair.

Hence, Black Irish. The typical Irish.

There were no people with dark skin, and they’d have been called their tribe.

If you read the diarists.

 Their analysis indicated that he had red hair, a trait never found in sub-Saharan Africa. 

i am shocked

Because Ramesses was known to have been of Libyan descent, historians have speculated that he probably had relatively light skin,

Remember, it’s a rookie mistake to assume the current population living there is genetically the same one from thousands of years ago. Wars happened.

Meanwhile, the Egyptian authorities were accused of trying to cover up Tut’s possible Jewish heritage due to the current tensions in the Middle East.

Surrounded by liars.

Yids waz kangs?

No, have you seen their totally straight noses? No.

However, most actual genetic experts acknowledge that ancient DNA is incredibly easy to contaminate (in one famous case, DNA identified as belonging to a dinosaur turned out to be from a modern human), making any DNA study of King Tut highly suspect.

Convenient.

But surely if they kept taking samples that wouldn’t be a problem?
They usually take samples by extraction too, not the surface.

What did the genetics say again?

https://uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801

Half of European men share King Tut’s DNA

Aah. Right.

Most modern linguists favor the “black land” meaning of the word. They argue that the Nile River’s yearly floods brought rich black soil, which ensured the country’s agricultural prosperity. As a result, the Egyptians called their land Kmt. The black soil provided a sharp visual contrast with the desert sands around the Nile, which ancient Egyptians called dsrt (“the red land”). But only the parts of Egypt closest to the Nile would have flooded with the black soil, and the Egyptians did not have any vocabulary to refer to race, so perhaps neither argument is wholly correct

The country with a religion revolving around the Nile, names itself after the soil it enriches?

Boggling.

Truly.

Some scholars have asserted that Arsinoe IV was part-African, meaning that Cleopatra’s mother (and Cleopatra herself) could have been part-African as well. In the 1990s, an archaeologist claimed to have identified Arsinoe’s tomb and skeleton. However, DNA testing on the bones was inconclusive—and we’re still not even sure that they’re her bones. It seems likeliest that Cleopatra was generally Mediterranean, a mix of Greek and various other nationalities. Ultimately, most classicists dismiss the question of Cleopatra’s race

Don’t look, don’t look they say

She was Greek.

Ptolemaic. Greek.
Maybe a little of something else, but mostly Greek.

They look so African

right?

totes African

from http://www.ancient.eu/Ptolemaic_Dynasty/

Cleopatra

Cleopatra Selene, above

Does that nose look African to you? Jawline? Eye shape?

 The Egyptians depicted themselves with skin tones ranging from light brown, to red, yellow, or black. Men were often darker than women, probably to indicate that males did manual labor outdoors, but ancient Egyptian artwork was not realistic and most skin tones were probably symbolic rather than realistic.

Yes, like the colouring on that last picture.

 to distinguish themselves from the Nubians (a people who lived in what is now Sudan), since they drew themselves with reddish or copper skin, but often painted Nubians black. Complicating the matter, a professor of African history has accused modern Egyptian authorities of tampering with ancient Egyptian artwork in order to hide their African features.

FFS

Modern scholars consider it almost impossible to judge the Sphinx’s ethnicity, since millennia of rain, wind, and heat have worn down the statue’s face.

Fair enough.

The world owes white people

Actually.

The list would be so long, and so what?

White people literally invented science itself.

You can’t top that.

http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781441974877-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1032441-p174029978

The Scientific Method?
1600s Europe, at the earliest.
Truly, the Scientific Enlightenment primarily in France, some England, a little Germany, formalized it. All those subjects and branches and divisions you now know? Taught in the universities. Nobody else even knew what these were, so they can’t claim it and they certainly didn’t teach it either.
All NW Europeans, mostly upper class men, a smattering of a few women.

Previously we had ‘natural science’ (the term for this is German, which should give you a clue), mucking about with plants mostly. Labeling and drawing, not really an experimental manipulation, is it?
I guess it’s like saying we had ancient ‘doctors’ – who didn’t see a disease they didn’t wanna stick a leech on.

Except… that isn’t the meaning of the term as we use it in modernity, is it?

Don’t be intellectually dishonest.

Fun fact: leech still means doctor, it’s a synonym.

It’s like trying to claim evaporation cooling was Muslim when at the latest it was Egyptian but probably stolen from more ancient civilizations, there are examples at Pompeii.
Islam mostly murdered its tall poppies because they questioned the religion. That isn’t whitey’s fault.
They had a few good philosophers – not scientists. There was the occasional competent mathematician, but if that’s how low your standard… not to mention, they only built upon Greek and Hindu developments.
I haven’t seen an Islamic Antikythera mechanism. If they had such an advanced knowledge, there’d be proof and they’d use it in battle. Compare with Greek fire, a variant of which was referenced in Game of Thrones. The knowledge of Greek fire was probably lost because of the Muslim conquests going on at the same time. Thanks, Mohammed. 

A little chemistry was developed during the Renaissance but kept quiet by something called a guild.
See Venice and mirrors.

You look at the root of anything STEM and I guarantee you there’s a racial European at the heart of it. I’ve yet to find a single exception.

However, the Egyptians did some fine, pioneering medicinal work in the field of surgery, which isn’t technically a science. These findings were stolen by Muslims.

Along with the country and its women. Look at the modern racial composition.

The eldest surgical examples I’ve seen are European, see trepanning.
Those damn Frenchies, inventing neurosurgery! (As English, we hate giving the French credit for anything except losing). It’s painful for me to admit that, viscerally painful. 

Video: The Druids and the Egyptians

hey, these posts are fun

advice to the guy: faster tempo, less monotone sound like you’re reading out a lecture, imagine you’re flirting with someone at a bar, fast back and forth to ideas


Contains:
The origin of the name Scotland and the Stone of Destiny.
Africans don’t have red hair and straight noses, also statues are absorbent, a lot of people dunno that. These white people (red hair is recessive down the ENTIRE line, it’s a Neanderthal trait actually) brought horses and chariots to Egypt, along with metallurgical technology (later expanded during the Scientific Revolution).
NW European genetics link at 7 minutes. GENETICS. 70% of British men. Less than 1% of modern Egyptians have that connection.
BOOM.

boom boom boom blackadder
KANGS WUZ KANGS. WIZARD KINGS WITH MAGIC ROCKS.

Once read a theory that Jesus was in Britain during one of his disappearing binges.
I bet that ties in.

Someone get this guy on alt right podcasts.
Seriously, why is he not a thing?


Relates to the Rhesus Negative mutation, which prevents outbreeding to an extent by aborting Positive babies (look it up, medical fact), thereby it must‘ve evolved in isolation (recessive).
Rh- is not present in Africans. It comes from the Cro Magnon man.

TLDR: OOA (Out of Africa) is BS. The BBC should really hire this guy since he crosses over into forensics, wider biology and other fields that are nigh-on impossible to falsify (unlike most mainstream cultural anthropology). That would be intellectually honest, which we know they are not.

The woman on the cover of The Occult Secrets of Vril may have known Nikola Tesla.

I… heard.
Somewhere.

‘Follow your heart’ is old advice

Like, hella.

0v0

Follow your heart as long as you live,
Do no more than is required . . .
Don’t waste time on daily cares
Beyond providing for your household;
When wealth has come, follow your heart,
Wealth does no good if one is glum!

http://www.humanistictexts.org/ptahhotep.htm#Follow Your Heart

It meant more in Egyptian culture, canopic jars, spirit types etc. They had about 5-6 types of soul.

Speaking of—-

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Tale_of_Two_Brothers

Why yes, JK Rowling is totally original as an author and didn’t completely rip off The Worst Witch.
Speaking of luvvies? Here’s a dramatic irony;

Benedict Cumberbatch – feminist, member of the Garrick (it’s a club that excludes women).

Irish comic character cast as mixed mystery meat

https://mic.com/articles/152038/zendaya-is-mary-jane-in-spider-man-homecoming-so-of-course-there-s-racist-backlash

Parents

Mixing nixes the white recessive genes. This isn’t political, it’s Mendel.
If you do not agree, you literally need to pick up a school book because you are inferior in intellect to a child.

Detour for butthurt:

aintevenmad

Behold, an Egyptian! And he’s one of the swarthier looking ones!

At best, they’re tan. And the ancient ones were paler because the Muslims hadn’t invaded yet and raped the women as slaves. #history #educateyourself

Fuck Afrocentrists claiming the white people stole from them for once! [FBI data, suck it]
We have genetic proof from mummies, documentation from the time and other cultures and artwork showing the elite (at least) were, in fact, pale. As in, white. This is conclusive, definitive and anyone arguing differently is a rent-seeker on white achievement. Cleopatra was Ptolemaic dynasty, a Greek-racial line (fun facts: the Greeks used to be blond closer to the founding of their Empire, Helen of Troy was blonde, but as they mixed and became swarthier, the Empire fell; I’m sure that’s a coincidence and nothing to do with Calhoun). She insisted on using Greek in documents in tandem and preferentially. The Rosetta Stone is no coincidence, and they used many languages because the equivalent of newspapers were leaving out stone tablets with the official record on them.

blog.oup.com/2010/12/cleopatra-2/

Apparently speaking Afrikaans would make me suddenly Black? Does that mean white African settlers aren’t colonialist oppressors now? #unintendedconsequences

To sum up: it is quite possible that Cleopatra was pure Macedonian Greek. But it is probable that she had some Egyptian blood, although the amount is uncertain. Certainly it was no more than half, and probably less. The best evidence is that she was three-quarters Macedonian Greek and one-quarter Egyptian. There is no room for anything else, certainly not for any black African blood. 

But sure, these people are the ones telling us race doesn’t matter. Of course, all their actions show this.

cute wink

Back to the SJW corporate entryism problem murdering anything cool by making the bandwagon a campaign slogan when the entire purpose of comic book films is ESCAPISM from that EXACT bullshit…

(these people are Grundies, they are the anti-matter of cool)
(as in, all this casting tumblrism nonsense may be making comic films unbearable for regular people)

I love the logic of these people, the way they claim if this one actor doesn’t get this one role in this one appearance-based industry they chose to work in, then every example of that race is doomed to failure like the Borg, but with black people. Is that not racist to assume, that they need Blackwashing Welfare? Why can’t black people write more books and make those books into films? Would they not be as good/popular? Why play the Cup and Ball game with actors? (Although seeing the signalling SWPL out of their multi-million dollar jobs is a 24K gold lining to this, finally they see consequences, hence intersectionality, really Black Power Feminism, oddly hasn’t caught on).

We all know the Spiderman reboot has been a shit-show but to fuck up the romantic lead as well? The character is bland, she does nothing but look ginger. That is her purpose, look reddish and pout. They know the performance but assume this franchise is a shoo-in for purchasing toys. Seriously, check the BO figures and compare to the Irish-complexioned counterpart once these become available.

This girl isn’t even black, the worst part is they keep calling her black when she clearly isn’t. She’s mixed, an entire other group, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills the way they abuse the One-Drop Rule when it suits them, labelling anyone slightly black as Black (Obama, basically all the part-black scientists by descent), but using it yourself for scientific purposes (e.g. heart medicine, not poisoning them) is supposedly bad?

Heads will roll...

Yes, these two could be twins…

See, first they replace the white people in Hollywood because the propaganda didn’t go far enough in the past 50 years (dating site data), then when white people see their immigrant replacements in the street (and outnumbering them, plus super-fertility) their brains don’t flag it up, accepting it as normal. That’s the plan. They did the same with the false Fun Gay stereotype, but ignore the facts on suicide, drug use and domestic abuse, they cracked a joke in this show. Humour creates sympathy without actually doing anything, and oh look, the Funny Black Sidekick stereotype appears! Wow, such coincidences.

Political correctness lies to create change, thusly Progressivism is brittle and already crumbling, with nothing Patriarchal left to burn as a distraction. Regular people are noticing now and disoriented.

There’s nothing racist about noticing that there’s no such thing as a black girl without black hair, they are literally defined by their hair colour more than their skin, the defining character trait is red. This is like when they hired the talentless hack black girl to play Lady Guinevere, whose entire thing was being white in the legends of a white country that had a real Saxon king called Arthur in a white continent and then claimed it was cos she was ‘best for the part’ (then again with ANOTHER black/mix playing literally The White Queen) and everything was ‘mythical/fictional’ (so why not ‘hire’ a sock on a stick? logic) bull-SHIT.

Let us not forget the worst example in recent history.

The sequel is not canon, QED.

If they can get you to say up is down once, their politics of delusion have got you for life. We are not blind and people are not putting up with this pretension, that’s what it is, a pretense. If you enter a looks-based industry, you choose to be judged on your looks. If race doesn’t matter, this shouldn’t happen. Yet we even see it with models despite their casting also being chosen based on clothes revenue (because that’s their job, not to stand there, but sell) as an actress’ job is to sell the character they are based on.

Social justice gives people a chance who don’t deserve a chance, on the grounds that other people get chances. It’s cultural welfarism and the groups involved should reject it on principle. If they believed they had merit to compete fairly. You have a toy, they must get a toy. You get to play Princesses (European royalty), they must get a Black Princess because fuck logic even when it’s set in a non-monarchical society. Selling toys is one thing and I noticed Emma Watson didn’t insist Belle be played by a Black girl, but perverting historical record is fascist, next they’ll be deleting people from photos instead of cropping and painting over the skin of portraits in galleries.

Feminists should be pissed because this is seen as a half-measure from casting a black MAN, as if the women were inferior in import and expendable.

It’s like when we all pretended Rihanna looked good blonde to be polite instead of admitting she looked fake like a stripper. It’s jarring to see a black girl (well, brown) Act White. It’s like a Wigger but in reverse, just wrong. Where’s the cultural appropriation people for white people’s hair colour? Oh, magically they cease to give a shit, like the rest of us.

This is oddly racist against the Irish, more of whom were slaves than black people, period. [read a book, seriously]

I’m tagging this as anti-white because the Irish have all the recessive traits including distinctive red freckles (MJ = Irish) often with green/blue eyes, genetics win this round. This Z-list girl looks the opposite of MJ, total miscast on purpose because they expect character fans will always show up anyway out of loyalty (but reason to execs this will attract the black girl demo, that hate SFF unless a black girl is cast, so …they hate SFF full stop, it’s all Mary Sue-ing) – not so in reality for both $$$ claims, not with so many properties on the market at once, hiring some social media bint is demeaning to us all just put in a fucking Kardashian you PC-peddling scum ruining ART.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

inb4: I would support a Kardashian hired in the role because at least it would be entertaining.

Footnotes:

margaretgeorge.com/adventures-in-research/2010/10/entering-the-world-of-helen-of-troy/

Up until the last couple of centuries, ‘black’ as a descriptor of women referred to HAIR. It was presumed by skin that all women were white, and where black, the particular geography was mentioned instead. Helen’s hair was not mentioned but her fair skin was, and even if brown as a half-way measure, women frequently dyed it. Fairness of flesh was picked up on as a class cue, implying fairness of eyes and hair, which crowds rarely saw so it didn’t matter much.

biographyonline.net/women/cleopatra.html

She was a member of the Ptolemaic dynasty, a family of Greek origin that ruled Egypt after Alexander the Great’s death during the Hellenistic period. The Ptolemies, throughout their dynasty, spoke Greek and refused to speak Egyptian, which is the reason that Greek as well as Egyptian languages were used on official court documents such as the Rosetta Stone. By contrast, Cleopatra did learn to speak Egyptian and represented herself as the reincarnation of an Egyptian goddess, Isis.

I know I’ll still get some “it doesn’t matter”s and “you’re racist for discussing race” people trying to write ALL this proof off.

  1. If it doesn’t matter, don’t alter the casting.
  2. It’s a conversation on pop culture, when you bring up race, it is on the table for everyone to discuss EQUALLY because this isn’t a Race Powertrip Studies class where you can preach solo and silence groups you hate, oppressively.

Also, we’re now so far into counter-signalling that trannies are turning anti-LGBT to call trannies ‘trannies’ and degenerates. What a time to be alive. You’re still a dude in a dress Blaire, but it’s been fun. It’s like when Roosh tried to be a white supremacist for edge points or that honest Holocaust documentary Jew was called anti-Semitic.

what wut wtf shock surprise slow turn eh littlefinger pause got