Dangerous, dangerous flags
“I return you many thanks for the honour you have done me; but Europe is not to be saved by any single man. England has saved herself by her exertions, and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.”
Then there’s the cuck Churchill:
“The gift of a common tongue is a priceless inheritance and it may well some day become the foundation of a common citizenship.”
I’d like to say I’m surprised…
Notice how a woman can’t quietly drink at a hotel any more? Every drink may be drugged.
While every man may not be a rapist, a certain level of paranoia is prudent.
If they target you, that’s pretty much it.
The victim blaming in these common cases makes me sick. It’s such a Just World fallacy where men expect if they were a woman, they’d be too smart to get raped… it doesn’t work that way. Predators target. Men are typically much stronger and in groups, impossible to resist. It’s so horrifying they shut their brain to the possibility, that life is really that dangerous for women, that what they most fear about prison is quite a statistical reality for the sex most rapists choose.
I think the real fear of rape is the only reason feminism is clinging on.
After all, the men won’t protect us.
I’m avoiding the internet until this wedding farce is over.
BTW, the father was never going to make the trip. It takes weeks to learn the cues and get the tailoring and co.
It was all PR to make her look doting.
Instead of a callous bitch.
They’ll say the mother or someone doing it is a “powerful feminist statement”.
I looked up the news in Windsor. To see how very safe it is.
Lots of rapists.
It’s a new thing.
There might even be a rape gang.
Rapists are pairing up!
They’ll spend so much on security for an American nobody cares about, meanwhile the white women are meant to just get raped and get over it.
No security money for them.
This seems to be a pattern.
No justice, certainly no real sentences. No deterrence whatsoever.
They also stopped giving out rapist descriptions, which would help women avoid the monsters.
Of course, you can guess why.
“My children, who have gone from me up to the local secondary school, have grey skin, poor teeth, poor hair, poor nails. They are smaller, they are thinner,” she said.
“At sporting events, you see your children in the year group compared to other children in an affluent area and you think: our kids are really small. When you see them with children of the same age who are from an affluent area, they just look tiny.”
What white privilege?
Despite invasions by Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Normans, and others, the genetic makeup of today’s white Britons is much the same as it was 12,000 ago, a new book claims.
In The Tribes of Britain, archaeologist David Miles says around 80 percent of the genetic characteristics of most white Britons have been passed down from a few thousand Ice Age hunters.
Note the precision of language. That is a scientist.
Technically, there’s no such thing as British.
There was no British Empire, it was the English Empire. You didn’t see the Welsh fucking up anyone.
Despite all the Guardian articles trying to make out we were awful, the People aren’t fooled.
YouGov found 44 per cent were proud of Britain’s history of colonialism while only 21 per cent regretted that it happened. 23 per cent held neither view.
The same poll also asked about whether the British Empire was a good thing or a bad thing: 43 per cent said it was good, while only 19 per cent said it was bad. 25 per cent responded that it was “neither”.
Americans don’t understand how political and meaningless the term British is.
Since the collapse of the Empire, it’s been meaningless.
People are either English, Welsh, Irish or Scottish. Sometimes a combination.
There are also little islands like Jersey that have their own flags.
Cooler than ours but derived from England’s original Three Lions heraldry.
The British is typically, Great Britain, and the union of the four countries is incredibly recent (Union Act 1707, 1800). It’s a term about what the Queen owns, similar to the UK but without pesky parts of Ireland. Jane Austen’s novels are older than Great Britain. England is a country in its own right, Parliament and the Queen are based there. It’s the central country.
The British Isles covers the most landmass. It’s huge. It’s geographic and includes a lot of tiny islands.
So again, if you’re discussing where a person is from, to say they’re from Britain is technically incorrect. At least, what Britain? Great? Isles? What? It’s like saying someone is European, unless you mean the continent (correct but vague) you cannot mean the legal construct (EU) because nobody’s DNA originates from a legal fiction. There is no such physical PLACE. There is no DNA for Britain, (sometimes ancient Briton, as in the study above) but it’s either English from England, Irish from Ireland, Scottish from Scotland or Welsh from Wales. British is meant to be from Britain but nowadays everybody has a British passport, a passport grants citizenship and financial entitlements it changes nothing about your DNA. To refer to blood, genes and ancestry, you cannot be British. It would be like referring to your occupation, it’s a legal thing.
Recently they’ve tried to claim dilution.
“Researchers have found 50 distinct genetic clusters (classified into broader groups) in Ireland and Britain”
That contradicts your headline.