Comic: The Routine

Every. Fucking. Time.

 

Alternate title: Damsel in distress, pathological altruism edition.

This toxic colonialism is bullshit. Deport the cuckians first.

IQ has nothing to do with gullibility. Predators have their own intelligence.

It isn’t charity with somebody else’s money. Damselling is pride.

(And by all definitions I know, treason!)

If it’s about love, why do they want money? – hookers come in many forms

Behold, the savage prostitute. A dog turd spray-painted gold still smells like shit.

“I don’t care if she’s a stripper, we’re in love!” Geopolitical edition.

World, you aren’t a damsel, you aren’t even a dame. Whitey is not your husband, we owe you nothing.

Okay, I’ll be happy to give them a one-time lump sum if they 1. leave us alone and STFU on it forever and 2. are forbidden from using White developments, all of them. Globalism is expensive.

Technological multiculturalism is killing us. Literally.

Narcissistic male views marriage as status symbol

And a cover. It is less a yoke and more a ball and chain because they expect to take, take take and never give (even their gender role) unless they expect more in return – so not a union, more like running a business.

Good marriages aren’t a scoreboard.

Being married isn’t an achievement, you signed your name. It isn’t a status to hit others with like a rhetorical weapon. A good marriage is an achievement but I guarantee the married men bitching about single women don’t have one of those. Shouldn’t you be with your family than wasting time online? It’s un-Biblical, they’re bad husbands. They cherish every woman BUT their wife. (And they deny their body belongs to their wife).

The Madonna/Whore complex means they are emotionally impotent with their own wife. They hate her because she is his wife. (Because they hate themselves, thus resent her for loving him).

They don’t have empathy, they can’t love (even themselves). They can only imitate and parody i.e. seduction, “romance” cliches, while acting out of sync behind the mark’s back (lying, confabulated memory, cheating). It’s ALL superficial so they intend to lovebomb, mirror (to seem like a soulmate) and trick “good” women into the trap of legal union (personality disorders do this all the time, usually the mask doesn’t slip until after the wedding so long courtship had the old role of filtering them out). The prey can’t escape.

There is usually gaslighting during courtship into codependency (or deeper from an already codependent woman) so he uses the woman for supply before the marriage but she views it as emotional intimacy (wrong*), taking advantage of the novelty of the situation and fact she hasn’t seen all his sides (not informed consent). They don’t even know how bitter he is until after marriage, typically (because he is running off her supply so it doesn’t come out). These are later the divorced guys who act like innocent maidens attacked by the dragon of divorce and warn all men off marriage because they personally sucked at it. (Husband is a job so they devalue it once it turns out to be, you know, WORK).

Psychopaths are best known for doing that bait and trap thing with marriage, we need strict legal protections from such people (men and women both) and psychopaths are the most pathological narcissist.

There are plenty of good videos on that channel, including ones about women and traits the narcissist seeks to take for themselves via relationships, as an emotional vampire.

Oh, and they always cheat in marriage. They claim all men are similarly weak or “unhappy” because they don’t like other men either, thinking of other men as happy, faithful or good husbands would kill them on the inside.

So when no-fault divorce is over, they’ll be screwed twice!

Marriages require both parties to have emotional maturity (cooperation, compromise) so any union with a narcissist in it is doomed, even if the other party is a literal Saint. Naturally, it’s never their fault, like any incompetent person so they get married again and again and make the same “mistakes” again and again but there’s no agency involved apparently.

They were innocent victims of the vagina, as they purchased a ring and got down on one knee and said things they didn’t mean and spent months planning and turned up to say some lines and where, oh, where, did they go wrong?

They’re never wrong, according to them. Despite how their life is always a mess.

They’ll claim men are leaders in a marriage but resent the business of actually leading.

This is the guy who’ll claim to be traditional but hates religion and has a long, long line of “exes” you’re not “allowed” to “judge”. They’re such hypocrites they’re a walking joke.

*Emotional labour is real and doing too much of it (for two whole people) can kill a woman (stress x disease risk) or, rarely, a man. Commonly, a man is killed by stress at work (physical labour) but a woman’s lifespan is shortened by stress at home (emotional labour) so who a woman marries can literally be life or death, it can be the difference of a happy life and extra decades. Women need this information.

I’d bet good money that Type A men have an unhappy marriage and the woman has a similar disease risk profile. A married man’s primary responsibility is to his wife and until society pushes this point hard, men won’t try. They’ll ignore the marriage for career, friends, addiction (workaholism is the socially desirable addiction though). If the man won’t Be the Man, nothing the woman does will succeed. Men shirk their duties, abandon the home (literally or spiritually) and what can a woman do about that? Force him? No! Then she’s being the man!

And random but when society values women’s happiness and feminine energy levels over her contribution to GDP, we’ll be nicer overall. EVERYBODY WINS.

I’ve seen feminine women mocked by other women (envy) and torn down by men (who knows it’s easier to bed a High T harridan). Pick your poison, guys. Either you want women to earn their keep and be a whore in your bedroom or you want a docile purer kind and shun the former. You can’t expect mutual exclusives, it’s impossible. And you have to be worthy of the woman you want or it won’t last.

Funny example

One guy I spoke to said he liked “traditional women” but he also filtered FOR a “career woman”.

His words. He thought this was clever. He wanted the status of her “achievements”, you see.

When pressed (and I was pressed myself at the ignorance), he said he expected a woman to have a “good” (secure) job (be locked in), and have “at least” a middle-class salary. I just told him he sounded like a woman… from the 50s.

He literally did, I swear, there were other details that sealed it e.g. sexual experience. Why would any sane man want a wife who’s had more fun with other men?

He insisted there was no contradiction or way this could possibly backfire on him. That, my friends, is the idiot in action. When I pointed out those are impossible values systems, polar opposites, he claimed a traditional woman would be “bad in bed” (like you can’t teach them?) and “lazy” for not wanting an office job. The feminist propaganda has sunk into men the deepest.

They feel entitled to seek their male qualities in their wife.

That’s dysfunctional and you can’t convince me otherwise.

How lazy! What, is he going to take on the female role and give birth?

He only claimed to want trad because it’s the current status symbol, because he likes the idea of it and the supply it might give him. He married an SJW. She cooks sometimes and “lets him” tradlarp. He’s a moron. The woman who is cautious is feminine, there’s no rush – the woman desperate for a husband, any husband, is using you.

I have betting odds on his divorce. Easy money.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/16/why-wont-women-be-right-wing/

As it is, hypersexualised porno society has made women very masculine, higher T. They also need it to defend themselves in a low trust, multiculti society and that, naturally, never gets a mention. Unsafe society = everyone gets more aggressive. Sort out the former and the latter reverts.

We’re cultural refugees, in a way. Pining for a world that doesn’t exist.

We live in the dishonour culture, where people who act like whores aren’t ashamed of it, they’re proud. With freedom of association, we could avoid these people (m/f).

Not every man who wants to get married would be a good husband. Sometimes they want a slave to abuse but in the Bible such treatment (like property, like using a machine or a PA, housekeeper) instead of the equal yoke, to love and to cherish, was grounds for divorce. So nope, they can’t hide behind religion…. unless we can stone them for adultery (lawsuits were less bloody).

Trad test: what should be the punishment for adultery?

Trads know adultery is a crime. To “commit” adultery demands punishment.

You don’t want a bunker

There seems to be a misapprehension that anyone with Fuck You Money will survive the Apocalypse, Zombie or Otherwise, in a bunker.

You don’t want a bunker.

Trust me.

The people who would be suited to bunker life are already antisocial.
The people who would go insane, inside of six months, are accustomed to living in sunny locales (SAD is a medical condition) and taking constant vacations to exotic places.

And the only person who likes being in a cave is Batman.

Think of it as similar to the isolation of space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_and_sociological_effects_of_spaceflight#Psychosocial_issues_on-orbit

“This tendency of some crew members to become more egocentric was called autonomization.”
Picture a tunnel full of billionaires, it sounds like a great reality show.
If they’re so certain they could do it now, they would.
If they cannot psychologically handle it now, they couldn’t when stressed either.

“In general, the crew members reported that their life in space was not as difficult as they expected prior to launch, despite a 20% increase in interpersonal problems during the second half of the missions. It was recommended that future crew members be allowed to control their individual schedules as much as possible.”
These people are not used to losing control.
If you’re holed up in a bunker, you’ve lost control of something.

The reality will slowly dawn.

How many are already on meds? No meds in space (whatever they say) or The Apocalypse.
“Most common are adjustment reactions to the novelty of being in space, with symptoms generally including transient anxiety or depression. Psychosomatic reactions also have occurred, where anxiety and other emotional states are experienced physically as somatic symptoms. Problems related to major mood and thought disorders (e.g., manic-depression, schizophrenia) have not been reported during space missions. This likely is due to the fact that crew members have been screened psychiatrically for constitutional predispositions to these conditions before launch, so the likelihood of these illnesses developing on-orbit is low.”
A bunker full of somewhat bipolar billionaires and nothing to do.
Also factor in how many CEOs have psychopathic tendencies.
Do you trust one with a butter knife?
“Asthenization, a syndrome that includes fatigue, irritability, emotional lability, attention and concentration difficulties, and appetite and sleep problems, has been reported to commonly occur in cosmonauts by Russian flight surgeons.[24] It has been observed to evolve in clearly defined stages.[25] It is conceptualized as an adjustment reaction to being in space that is different from neurasthenia, a related neurotic condition seen on Earth.[26]”

For Mars:
“Given the long distances involved, the crew must function autonomously and develop their own work schedules and solve operational emergencies themselves. They must also be able to deal with medical and psychiatric emergencies, such as physical trauma due to accidents as well as suicidal or psychotic thinking due to stress and depression.”

‘accidents’
I doubt Musk could ever go to Mars, given his mental problems.
So a bunker of billionaires, some bipolar and others psychotic.

Yeah, those are gonna be bloodbaths.

They could volunteer six months for a bunker scenario right now, a trial dry run, but let’s be honest, if their net worth dropped by 50% to mere rich asshole levels they’d probably kill themselves, and what are the odds the market will come down at some point? Exactly, they won’t make it to the bunker.

My money is on a sniper rifle from the corner office aimed at all their former employees trying to escape by car for the bank.

This is assuming they didn’t get grenades. Considering their love of flamethrowers… possible.

Note: nothing I say on this site is encouragement, it’s academic.

With a little silliness thrown in.

However, satellites will pick the concrete up and will raid it while the residents are held by the “police” on fake charges (how Communists work). They may be “let go”, to an empty bunker, to starve to death.

Even if never found, they would be effectively incarcerating themselves for us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stir_crazy_(condition)
“It is now used to refer to anyone who becomes restless or anxious from feeling trapped and even somewhat claustrophobic in an environment perceived to be more static and unengaging than they can any longer continue to hold interest, meaning, or value in.”
Could you take away their instagram for a week, that’s all I’m saying.

What happens when the anorexic women (read: all of them) run out of vegan food?

They’ll riot when they run out of “nutritional yeast.”

Have you seen a vegan who didn’t get their fix? It’s like She-Hulk.

If you’re used to Fine Dining Gourmet experiences, sitting in a concrete coffin indefinitely with people you secretly hate will trigger every amygdala into a maddened frenzy. Atheists (read: all of them) had nothing to live for before.

The hedonism numbs them from how much they hate themselves.

The Zombie Apocalypse is likeliest to happen in the bunkers.

It isn’t survival of the richest, this would be survival of the dimmest.

You don’t want a bunker.

The limits of tolerance

Wings don’t really exist anymore. Mostly, nobody cares about capitalism/socialism.

It’s all about the moral issues, the personal issues and what affects society. Social harm.

So it’s social harm against too much freedom (at what point can society curtail your damaging, antisocial expression, adult?)… the cult of individualism is dying and we could never afford it as a society/nation/race in the first place.

The libertarian who wants good roads and doesn’t want to pay for them.

“You don’t own me, but you owe me!” entitlement.

No.

And the cognitive dissonance applies elsewhere.

Plus the left wing says it’s beyond question. That is illiberal. They’re dogmatic because their foundational principles are being shown, empirically, to be entirely false and actually damaging the societies they’re in.

They refuse to admit.

Brexit 2nd vote?

Not our President?

Closed to reality.

IQ isn’t real but GPA is!

We need funding to teach IQ!

NURTURE IS ALWAYS TRUE. NATURE IS A LIE.

People can change but if they don’t want to it’s your fault. Don’t expect criminals to stop being criminals! Don’t apply our logic unless we say it’s okay! We love freedom of thought! We’re intellectuals!

Echo chambers of lies. Nice lies, killing you softly.

You don’t need to suffer, we’ll bail you out with free money if you sell us your soul.

The fake angel pouring poison in your ear. You didn’t sin, it was an accident, wasn’t it?

Learned helplessness, enabling destructiveness, pathological altruism – all abuse.

They can’t rule people unless they’re broken. Male and female. Poor and rich.

It intentionally reduces healthy independence and produces conflict by appealing to sin. Eat the apple, you deserve it. For every group. Everyone is weakened. Decadent rich, stupid poor, angry women, apathetic men.

By appealing to every group’s unique weakness, the chaos seems natural.

It isn’t.

Men are encouraged to sleep around and women are encouraged to hate their libido.

Insecurity in everybody.

The Left is even eating itself in a purity spiral, purity of delusion.

Virtue signalling insanity. Whoever can pretend the most insane bullshit will become utopia magically (magical thinking) wins. Spot it.

The blind optimists win.

trans. I can afford to ignore reality. Countersignal.

They create nothing so have no new solutions to their own problems, nobody to blame but don’t say they’re useless! The first time it went wrong didn’t count, try try again! Socialism has never been tried, guys!

You can’t argue with a moral relativist.

Literally.

There’s no evil to attack, they don’t see it.

They don’t really believe in laws because what enforcement? All feelings.

What about the victim’s feelings?

Where are the principles? Lowest immoral common denominator. Celebrated inferiority (below norm). Look how well we’re doing, we can afford this!

Like atheists arguing in bad faith about what God isn’t. You can’t prove a negative and they don’t believe in the positive concept they discuss – it’s all theory, wishy washy useless pontificating. It’s trolling, debate is impossible. They don’t care. They pretend to care.

Special plea: dehumanizing and ruining people’s lives is virtuous when we do it. Delusional hand of God, Angel of Death type reasoning. That is what all evil people believe.

They are deliberately blind to their own evil. They think they’re flawless based on what they eat.

>love everyone, positive thoughts! hate is bad!
>spends most weeks outrage posting on twitter

Age of Hypocrisy. Send in the pretentious clowns.

Send every stray African to rich California and London areas, only the liberal ones.
See how fast they complain. Holier than thou poor-haters.

I won’t rest until I see gypsies cover Hampstead Heath.

Everybody belongs to everybody else

No, BNW fans, there is no “right to reproduce” because that requires another person’s consent (and marriage license*).

Things a rapist would say.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/723323/Sexual-partner-fertility-disability-World-Health-Organisation-IVF

Your rights end where another’s begin. The entitlement is sickening.

Otherwise various tumblr fandoms, say Hiddleston’s would be entitled to rape him or at least steal his sperm. No.

And the men celebrating this (hoping to get hookers on taxpayer money**) don’t want to pay child support?

R-types, my God.

*Technically a marriage license was the old way to license reproduction. Obtaining a good match was difficult, courtship was logical!

**Relief is within your grasp….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gods_of_the_Copybook_Headings

Subtext: if you are celibate or damn, not a slut, there’s something wrong with you.

Stop the shaming for things that are prosocial.

What a “player”

Rapist jailed after beating woman and keeping her as a ‘sex slave’

During cross-examination, vile Patton even asked his defence barrister: ‘How can it have been rape if there was no violence?’

Where the hell would someone get such a totally wrong idea?

This is why coercion and threats don’t count as consent. Legally.
It is much the same as a written contract.

Leeds Crown Court heard that Patton was ‘obsessed’ with his victim and he threatened to hurt her family and damage their property if she did not agree to meet him.

He should be swinging from a rope like the Rotherham lot. How can white supremacists claim to be superior while they’re soft on people like this? You want to let this one run around near your sisters, mothers, grandmothers, daughters – because an owner of a penis can do no wrong? You think you’d get low crime that way? Like majority white Europe never hanged people?

No Patriarchy in history went nicely on abusive little men, let alone easy.
They knew they only get worse, a rotten apple mustn’t be allowed to spoil the barrel.
His victim is ruined for life. As an r-type, you’d expect him to be proud of this.

Sexual entitlement, this is where it leads.

Today, at the same court, Patton was sentenced to 13 years in prison.

For seven charges? I hate this country. Why bother? Why not 13 days? 13 minutes?

Patton, who in the past had told the woman she was ‘nothing but a dog’,

Clean the gene pool, please. Men, this is your gender role.

slapped her repeatedly and even brandished a knife before telling her he was going use her as a sex slave.

Where did he get that idea?

Did anyone ask? ….

“No violence” guys, and if you think he’s nicer to other men, you’d be naive.
Psychopaths are worse with men than they are with women.

But women need to “give men a chance”, right? Fuck our right to safety, let’s coddle some snowflakes.
When men give creepy guys on the bus a chance, we might listen.

Patton has previous convictions for criminal damage, theft and battery.

And just 13 years?

And doing anything to an unconsenting person is violence. Because of the consent part. So I’m guessing low IQ with omnipotent fantasies of Genghis Khan?

(He probably thinks Khan wasn’t a rapist either).

The battery occurred in 2014 when he pinned his own mother to the floor by the neck and then punched her once in the face.

Alpha.

A generation with no father to slap them for getting out of line? Guessing.
What’s the bet he blames his mother for his deadbeat father? Would this be delta or omega, in the silly hierarchy?

But we can’t bring back drafting why? If they’re violent thugs anyway?

After being locked in the house the first night, his victim banged on the windows and screamed to attract attention, but Patton ran over and grabbed her by the mouth and nose, put his arm around her neck and told her to shut up.

“No violence” guys.

He choked her but no violence, obviously.

Having put his arm around her neck, Patton threw her on the floor then picked her up and threw her on the sofa, smothering her and causing her to struggle to breathe. When she told him that she did not want him, Patton replied: ‘Wrong answer.’

“No violence”.

Sometimes the feminists have a point. The right to refuse anything is a basic human right of liberty. I bet he didn’t want to marry her, either, so a traditional excuse of “but it’s creepy love!” wouldn’t wash.

I doubt her father would give permission to let a man abuse his daughter, in marriage or out.

This isn’t a thing where it’s okay when white people do it. I see too many soft men talking tough about tan-toned women but when it’s a white person and especially a male there’s an almost privileged number of excuses made.

But there’s no such thing as male privilege (read end, I now believe). Any woman who doesn’t want to be raped is a feminist (well, shit, I guess we all are, how terrible of us not to be whores from porn).

No, there are no excuses for any aspect of this. It is evil.

EVIL.

Evil when any sex, race, sexuality does it.

Pure, Satanic evil.

Patton grabbed her hands and made her hit herself in the face. She was petrified, crying her eyes out, and he picked up a knife from the mantelpiece.

 

“No violence”

She was screaming for him to calm down. He was telling her she should slit her throat, but she managed to calm him down and he forced her to kiss him and tell him she loved him.

“No violence”

The next morning, he told her that if she performed oral sex on him that it would calm him down before ejaculating inside her wearing no protection.

Rape, would count even in a relationship. Clear elements of force (ordering, changes).

It’s like the callous men assume this can never happen to them either.
Plenty of male rape victims in the world. Rapists use the same tactics on them.

Let me guess, after the (attempted) coercion, she put up last minute resistance?

That force has a legal name, rape.

Check the legal codes. I did.

When the victim went for a shower, Patton came in and raped her again.

I wonder if Roosh V’s forum will welcome him with open arms for having a “concubine”. Check the web history, I’m certain you’ll find it, but the police haven’t reached the level of common sense where they look for incitement to rape and “rape isn’t real” (because women aren’t human) propaganda. I said this would happen years ago, you plant the entitlement and lie about the laws then eventually some psycho will act on it.

But the propagandists are also legally culpable. This isn’t a “game”…

‘Given his young age, I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and not say that he is dangerous.’

He should be swinging. I’m sure he’ll convert to Islam while he’s in there. He’ll fit right in.

Update: I can only find the false dichotomy of rape and violence (rape is inherently violent as the ultimate sexual, violent crime) in PUA materials.

This was literally the top of the search results. Don’t get mad at me.

e.g. http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape

“What I’ve gathered from the words of these future Pulitzer Prize winners is that women are not getting raped by violent offenders while taking a jog in the park or walking through a dark street—they are getting raped by men they already know,”

I can’t find this false distinction anywhere else? Can anyone else show an earlier origin?

Seriously. Genuine request. Where did this toxic narrative come from?

“I also read that men must be taught not to rape,”

but what of the places that teach them to rape?

“which means that they are all born with the capability to rape and have zero instinct to know that taking a woman with violence is improper.”

Define violence. You don’t have to pin someone down if you coerced them but both are violent acts in consent law, whether it’s sexual or cheating granny out of her title deeds. Any force of consent is not consent.
In that very wording there is already violence “taking”, rape means to “take”.

The basic premise of that mess was: It isn’t my male duty to control my body, it is the world’s responsibility to tread on eggshells around it for me.

SJW logic.

That’s why everybody thought wow, what a pajama boy. Handle your own feelings, including lust. That’s in the sodding Bible. The men who claim to know how sexual relations should play out better than Jesus

pic unrelated

and that strangely put all the social power on one side (a dying society, because the sexes can’t cooperate) is a sign of how our times are done for.
And if rape were legal, it would mostly be men raping other men. It would involve murder. You can’t have a rape culture without a high risk of homicide. The world would be a gay bar toilet at 2am. Somehow I don’t think this is what they envisioned, being very echo chamber. The highest sex drive men… are gay. The streets would be like prison for the average man, kidnappings and false imprisonments would be the norm.

There was no logic to call it a “thought experiment”, it was a stupid metaphor (private space*, sexual safe space, yes!) about how a woman’s No is never real because neither is rape. If you don’t believe in certain things, what’s the point calling yourself a society?

This guy (top) lived out Roosh’s rape “experiment”, on “private” (read: false imprisonment) property. Nobody else seems to have made this connection.

*Which is ironically calling on ideas of a marital bed and conjugal rights to endorse fornication and rape.

Forget the lobster king

Reference

https://theconversation.com/psychologist-jordan-peterson-says-lobsters-help-to-explain-why-human-hierarchies-exist-do-they-90489

For example, one of the most relevant brain structures for dominant social behaviour is the amygdala, located in the temporal lobe of primates including humans. Arthropods don’t have an amygdala (lobsters don’t even have a brain, just an aglomerate of nerve endings called ganglia).

Peterson’s followers are amygdala triggered by their failures as men.
He tells them to do nothing about this. This keeps them dependent on him. Mindless.
I might post studies to this effect….

They’re like SJWs, like the male equivalent of black power activists, desperately clinging to delusions of grandeur. Most men weren’t great, most of their ancestors were shit-covered serfs. They’re trying to take credit for what other races, culture and genetic families have done. This won’t work. The material doesn’t reside in them. They have nothing to call on.
Reality is triggering them.
The delusion is all they have. Currently.

You can’t blame the world, or your parents, or women for your personal faults forever. They’re waking up and their brain will mature, it’s a question of whether they go easy or not.

If all women reject them (and men socially, but they ignore this canary), maybe the women are right? Maybe they’re unfit? Won’t change? (Crazy people never learn). With the common pajama boy bitchiness, they need to turn gay or die alone.

I’m kind in the grand scheme of things.

This is what you need. Really listen.

Technically, if you want to be tin foil, anhedonia is protecting you from more sin. It’s your brain telling you the input is wrong, morally.

There are status replacements e.g bullying, that also ought to be discouraged. This used to happen with good father figures.

Most men cannot have status, like most women cannot be great beauties. You must accept this as a sex or waste your life.
You don’t see us shooting up schools, we get over it. Men need to drop the entitlement to have any hope of living, accept yourself as flawed humans, otherwise they’ll suffer in avarice always wanting what they can’t have.

Tantalus springs to mind. Sisyphus was useful at some point.

The Deadly Sins are aptly named.

Then again

He was punished for chronic deceitfulness by being compelled to roll an immense boulder up a hill, only to watch it roll back down, repeating this action forever.

Cheats never prosper is true.

King Sisyphus promoted navigation and commerce

but was avaricious and deceitful. 

Ah, the twins!

Most famously, Tantalus offered up his son, Pelops, as a sacrifice. He cut Pelops up, boiled him, and served him up in a banquet for the gods. The gods became aware of the gruesome nature of the menu, so they did not touch the offering

The first Boomer.

Pagans have their limits, despite having no sexual virtues.

There is no such thing as a chaste pagan.

Tantalus was also the founder of the cursed House of Atreus in which variations on these atrocities continued. Misfortunes also occurred as a result of these acts, making the house the subject of many Greek tragedies.

Karma.
You can screw who you want but don’t steal things, harm your kin or kill your kids.

Lessons for bad Boomers.