Egalitarian mythos, reverse snobbery

https://bonald.wordpress.com/2015/09/24/the-problem-of-egalitarian-superiority/

It is.

The secret to egalitarianism’s success is that the superior people have been converted to egalitarianism.  They can’t straight-up admit this, of course, since the content of their creed is that there are no superior people, or at least that it has little connection to social power.  On the other hand, they don’t try very hard to deny something so gratifying to their egos.  Officially, IQ doesn’t measure anything, but they make sure you know that theirs are higher than the conservatives’.  Marriage is officially oppressive, but they like to remind us that they beat us on avoiding divorce and unwed pregnancy.  These claims are all more-or-less true.  Liberals dominate every profession because they are by-and-large superior…..

It’s counter-signalling snob. Reverse snobbery. And it’s entirely based on social power, which is inherited (this is why they deny HBD).

I’m too smart to believe in IQ people.

I inherit furniture but throw it out to buy Ikea.

I’ll get an internship I don’t need to be paid for by middle-class secondary school connections but I’ll go to University and treat it like a Booze Cruise.

I can afford to take a Gap Yah on my parent’s savings. You aren’t really human until you travel.

We don’t hate Europe, we love Eurotrash! Our own white trash, however….

Every ism is valid but classism is just silly, what’s with the chip on your shoulder?

They get to tell themselves they earned their privilege. And it’s permanent (nope!)…

Boy, are they in for a shock.

When will this country waterboard the socialists with their own champers?

If we’re all equal, they deserve their position and nobody can drag them down.

Commies want to end inheritance

Not tax, actually inheritance.

Making property worthless, since it cannot be transferred.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/24/utopian-thinking-fund-welfare-state-inheritance-tax

Sorry, excuse me, you’d need a brain to think of that.

Why wait until they’re dead to steal their life savings? Why not make saving illegal?

After all, keeping your earnings is selfish, what are you going to do with that money?
Ban compound interest, it causes inequality.

/s

If only the State owns property, the People have nothing and will give up their labours in short order. Cattle think the grass belongs to them.

Picture the psychology of these people.

This is where ‘wealth tax’ always leads – you have more, I can steal it, because I don’t have it.

They hate nationalism but they love nationalizing on behalf of the Queen’s property portfolio – except council tax means you don’t actually own freehold. It’s a license to pay further tax (after income, VAT, state admin, legal fees, stamp duty etc).

comment

In other words, encourage people NOT to save for retirement, for the future, because anything you don’t spend will be stolen (confiscated, if you wish to be polite) by the state to subsidize those who do not save, or plan ahead.

They already do.

There’s no rationale for inheritance tax.
You’re taxed for dying.
It was a recent change and intended to be temporary.
Now the Government is a 40% stakeholder in all profits you make but no debts.

It’s fucking rigged.

Keynesians want to destroy a house to create jobs to build another.
They’re the four economic horsemen of a real Depression.

this economic illiterate should be shot, or at least laughed out of the room
Economics is by no means my main gig and I see this plain as the egg on this bitch’s face, I’m ashamed to share a sex with this vapid ditz.

best short comment

Funny how the Guardian socialist readership suddenly become all right wing when faced with the prospect of losing their inheritances. Tax the *other* rich!

This authoritarianism is why the People always killed the Communists.

Equality is evil. Behaviourism proves why Communism will never work. Hell, just the Marshmallow test! Same opportunities, differing outcomes! THE NASH EQUILIBRIUM.

Tall Poppy Syndrome and the myth of equality

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102769

Now, all of these in fact have been the economic effects of pursuing far too much equality, and I think we have very much now come to the end of the road. And, in fact, we find that the persistent expansion of the role of the state, beyond the capacity of the economy to support it, and the relentless pursuit of equality has caused, and is causing, damage to our economy in a variety of ways. It’s not the sole cause of what some have termed the ‘British sickness’ but it is a major one.

Now, what are the lessons then that we’ve learned from the last thirty years? First, that the pursuit of equality itself is a mirage. What’s more desireable and more practicable than the pursuit of equality is the pursuit of equality of opportunity. And opportunity means nothing unless it includes the right to be unequal and the freedom to be different.

One of the reasons that we value individuals is not because they’re all the same, but because they’re all different. I believe you have a saying in the Middle West: ‘Don’t cut down the tall poppies. Let them rather grow tall.’ I would say, let our children grow tall and some taller than others if they have the ability in them to do so. Because we must build a society in which each citizen can develop his full potential, both for his own benefit and for the community as a whole, a society in which originality, skill, energy and thrift are rewarded, in which we encourage rather than restrict the variety and richness of human nature.

Diversity!

Read Genius Famine.
n.b. The problem of obedience in schools also applies to the military.

Now, holding these views as strongly as I do, you can imagine that I was particularly interested to read a description of some of the problems in Czechoslovakia. And the description went like this—and I’ll tell you the year to which it referred in a moment. ‘The pursuit of equality’—I’m quoting—‘has developed in and unprecedented manner [end p147] and this fact has become one of the most important obstacles to intensive economic development and higher living standards. The negative aspects of equality are that lazy people, passive individuals, and irresponsible employees profit at the expense of dedicated and diligent employees, that unskilled workers profit at the expense of skilled ones, that those who are backward from the viewpoint of technology profit at the expense of those with initiative and talent.’

The problem isn’t women, even the ditzy ones. It’s a systemic issue.
You see the same moral weakness in all-boys schools, for instance.

the r in Refugees Welcome signs + funnies

Look at the facial expression in the Bible quote. That’s an atheist going to Hell for blasphemy.

Spliced with photo of actual ‘refugees’. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Hopefully the Manchester attack, nail-bombing little girls has redpilled these feminists.
Somehow I doubt it. This is the one that started it all.

This one in particular triggers me, the way to kill it is with apathy: So?

So was Jack the Ripper, so was Hitler, so is Trump. Tired of whataboutism.

“they are us, we are them”

true

Meanwhile, actual refugees

Yeah, let’s not save these people waving round the white flag of Christendom.

Are they welcome in YOUR home? Why not?

JK Rowling has yet to take in any ‘refugees’ that someone offered to pay to fly to her homes!

She is irrelevant. Like…

Emma Watson hasn’t spent a night in the Calais camp alone, without security.

Locks are racist! No borders? No walls! Let’s all live in pagodas! 

Now a series of triggering memes and funnies.

It’s been a while. 120 funnies. Some repeats. A few serious.

about as real as her hair

Going by her Coco the Clown makeup, I think they do.

The People do not consent to open borders. The native people.

Everyone into Lord of the Rings.

All harassment is bad but sexual harassment is the worst.
It’s the First World, fucking act like it.
Recently, a German woman was beaten by a ‘migrant’, because she told him not to call her a bitch.

Tesla’s expression, my fucking sides.

He never said that but yes. Fitness is in adaptation.

Just like consciousness. You can’t touch it or test it. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s the scientific concept of spirit.
It isn’t scientific though.

Sexual orientation theory is BS. There’s only behaviour – which hole is your goal?

SJW’s playbook.

The alt-lite treats the J-word as their N.

And strange brown men on the street.

The temporary alliance of SJWs and Muslims is simple: the sexually entitled support the sexually entitled.
Also take down White Man but obviously, SJWs aren’t white or men, typically.

Women get prison for sexual humiliation of a man

Throw away the key. It must have been horrific.

I post these stories to prove that 1. there are terrible White people and I don’t stick up for these tarts, 2. the law is equally applied for these crimes but owing to 3. the numbers of one sex committing a crime (perps) are skewed, you rarely see it. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, there is justice on sexual crime and we can’t be silent. I may fit into the same category as these white women but I’m not about to defend their actions like feminists, SJWs and MRAs or MGTOWs would suggest. If it’s wrong, it’s wrong, whoever does it.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/570073/Girl-gang-sex-attack-on-footballer-jail-time-bizarre-sex-assault-footballer-star

Standards apply to everyone. This is the First World and we need to act like it.