The lie of this century.
Diversity is (unity)? Very Orwell.
Bad schools create a bad society.
Multiculturalism and equality are based on two lies.
- People are not simply legally equal, but biologically the same, a mere opinion held in the liberal arts contradicted by the black swan study of biology. This view became redundant with the discovery of DNA. Not only are people different, they’re so different we can look at it under a microscope and measure how much.
- People are blank slates who may be forced into an equal mould by the magical power of (state) education. Despite evidence from neuroscience, of dragging prosperity down to the lowest common denominator, the connection between national IQ with economic prosperity, and finally, the fact that, assuming education may be capable of providing the same boost in achievement (let’s assume 15 IQ points as an arbitrary point), that everyone still begins at a different place (e.g. 85, 100, 120), while accruing those points, so the differences between them will never be neutralized (against meritocracy and human rights) but in fact, unintended consequences will make the differences and inequalities more pronounced. Compounded by the high IQ demands of a scientific society.
The suicide of Germany by genocidal subversives.
They came by force. Where met with borders, they attack. They are hostile forces. They are invaders. They come to take money (usually sending it home in remittance, so it doesn’t even remain in the economy) and rape white women (they admit to predating on us alone and ignoring their own).
What does this mean?
They will not leave unless forced.
That is the truth Europe will come to learn. It’s either all or nothing. Half measures will fail. And when the White man turns, the entire world will tremble before his feet.
On an abstract ideological level, multiculturalism is war. There will be stronger memes as there are more willing soldiers. Those liberals screaming DOWN WITH WESTERN CIV in the 60s are in power now. Decades of pacifist propaganda and threats of punishment for ‘hate crime’ and ‘hate speech’ have handcuffed freedom of expression, however reasonable and peaceful.
Where there is no peaceful recourse and desperate men are backed into a corner, the result will be bloody. We’ve passed the negotiation stage, thwarted by our corrupt politicians, and the corner is seeming mighty tight these days.
OT: If someone is mugged, it shouldn’t matter who the attackers/victims are or why, neither party can help which demographic groups they slot into. The crime, the action is exactly the same thing. With serial offenders an argument could be made for targeting and that may affect sentencing as an aggravating factor, but what if it’s a coincidence? What if it’s a set-up? What if the prosecution is clutching at straws and need to meet targets? Isn’t assuming a racial or sexual motive illegal, indulging in the same prejudice themselves, where’s the proof? You can’t prove these things claimed, they are hearsay and circumstantial yet admissible in a court of law as speculation. Doesn’t it follow gender studies nonsense rules of privilege and oppression, which are unscientific? Since when did the supposed mental state of the criminal, which can never be proven, have such a mythos around it? Aren’t those by definition thought criminals? As if pre-judging people is a crime? The very everyday common meaning of prejudice that everyone does as a fact of perception and cognition? Isn’t profiling the police do pre-judging based on crime stats? The only part of mens rea that matters is the decision to commit the crime, the motivation means nothing in practical terms. A man who mugs you to feed his family isn’t less a mugger than someone who did it because you ‘look gay’. What does that even mean? If people can be defined by their appearance, isn’t the law prejudiced? Isn’t that racist/judgemental on part of law enforcement or judiciary? Hypocritical? What about those who fake hate crimes? Why aren’t they punished and censured in the exact same way? Why is the censure one-sided to the crybully self-proclaimed yet professional victim-mongers? Why are some groups protected against hate crimes e.g. homosexual but the other groups in that category are not e.g. heterosexual? Doesn’t that violate the principle of equal before the law?