The white problem

The lie of this century.


Diversity is (unity)? Very Orwell.

Bad schools create a bad society.

Multiculturalism and equality are based on two lies.

  1. People are not simply legally equal, but biologically the same, a mere opinion held in the liberal arts contradicted by the black swan study of biology. This view became redundant with the discovery of DNA. Not only are people different, they’re so different we can look at it under a microscope and measure how much.
    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/the-blank-slate-view-of-humanity-is-looking-increasingly-outdated/
  2. People are blank slates who may be forced into an equal mould by the magical power of (state) education. Despite evidence from neuroscience, of dragging prosperity down to the lowest common denominator, the connection between national IQ with economic prosperity, and finally, the fact that, assuming education may be capable of providing the same boost in achievement (let’s assume 15 IQ points as an arbitrary point), that everyone still begins at a different place (e.g. 85, 100, 120), while accruing those points, so the differences between them will never be neutralized (against meritocracy and human rights) but in fact, unintended consequences will make the differences and inequalities more pronounced. Compounded by the high IQ demands of a scientific society.

The suicide of Germany by genocidal subversives.

They came by force. Where met with borders, they attack. They are hostile forces. They are invaders. They come to take money (usually sending it home in remittance, so it doesn’t even remain in the economy) and rape white women (they admit to predating on us alone and ignoring their own).

What does this mean?

They will not leave unless forced. 

That is the truth Europe will come to learn. It’s either all or nothing. Half measures will fail. And when the White man turns, the entire world will tremble before his feet.

donotfuckwithwhitepeople

They’ll remember.

On an abstract ideological level, multiculturalism is war. There will be stronger memes as there are more willing soldiers. Those liberals screaming DOWN WITH WESTERN CIV in the 60s are in power now. Decades of pacifist propaganda and threats of punishment for ‘hate crime’ and ‘hate speech’ have handcuffed freedom of expression, however reasonable and peaceful.

Where there is no peaceful recourse and desperate men are backed into a corner, the result will be bloody. We’ve passed the negotiation stage, thwarted by our corrupt politicians, and the corner is seeming mighty tight these days.

OT: If someone is mugged, it shouldn’t matter who the attackers/victims are or why, neither party can help which demographic groups they slot into. The crime, the action is exactly the same thing. With serial offenders an argument could be made for targeting and that may affect sentencing as an aggravating factor, but what if it’s a coincidence? What if it’s a set-up? What if the prosecution is clutching at straws and need to meet targets? Isn’t assuming a racial or sexual motive illegal, indulging in the same prejudice themselves, where’s the proof? You can’t prove these things claimed, they are hearsay and circumstantial yet admissible in a court of law as speculation. Doesn’t it follow gender studies nonsense rules of privilege and oppression, which are unscientific? Since when did the supposed mental state of the criminal, which can never be proven, have such a mythos around it? Aren’t those by definition thought criminals? As if pre-judging people is a crime? The very everyday common meaning of prejudice that everyone does as a fact of perception and cognition? Isn’t profiling the police do pre-judging based on crime stats? The only part of mens rea that matters is the decision to commit the crime, the motivation means nothing in practical terms. A man who mugs you to feed his family isn’t less a mugger than someone who did it because you ‘look gay’. What does that even mean? If people can be defined by their appearance, isn’t the law prejudiced? Isn’t that racist/judgemental on part of law enforcement or judiciary? Hypocritical? What about those who fake hate crimes? Why aren’t they punished and censured in the exact same way? Why is the censure one-sided to the crybully self-proclaimed yet professional victim-mongers? Why are some groups protected against hate crimes e.g. homosexual but the other groups in that category are not e.g. heterosexual? Doesn’t that violate the principle of equal before the law?

Better-looking embrace inequality

http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/researchers-few-bad-hair-days-can-change-your-life

The series of five studies conducted by Neale and Belmi, with participants that included both men and women, has important implications for research on inequality. If you believe you are attractive, you tend to think you belong in a higher social class yourself and believe, accordingly, that hierarchies are a legitimate way for organizing people and groups. You also are more likely to believe people lower down in a hierarchy are there because they deserve to be. The research also showed that self-perceived physical attractiveness mattered more to people’s perception of their social rank than their self-perceived goodness — qualities like empathy and integrity — did.

Good luck ironing out that kink.

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

The lookism people have a point. Both groups.
And a love of competency is natural too. If you have a bad leader, they don’t last long.

This research is the first to draw an explicit connection between people’s perceptions of their own physical attractiveness and their attitudes toward inequality and hierarchies. Among other things, it helps establish how malleable people’s views of inequality are.

No. No they aren’t. That’s the point. You can only boost your looks (SMV+MMV) by 2, 3 points maxed out.

Video: European men have been too feminized

This is sexual terrorism directed towards women” – perfect tweet.
Rape jihad is terrorism, Islamic State brag about coercing their enemies into submission, their trade in Christian women as sex slaves, the original type of slave (the word comes from Slav and they’re white as snow). They use jihad to target the men for regular violence (unless they’re little boys, equally evil, is it their fault for what they wore too?) in what are openly called ‘terror attacks’ yet dehumanise women into sex objects (acted upon, no volition or humanity, less than animals which at least defend themselves without getting arrested) and blonde whores (they’re all porn addicts), and the t-word is one the media dare not utter. Women hold the democratic power, and as I’ve already covered in the statistics, skew more conservative than men already. Those are the hallmark behaviours of an invasion, the respective punishments to men and women, without mentioning ‘conquest by womb’ as they admitted they’re doing. FYI rape can cause infertility and they get off on taking something belonging to another man (in this case ‘their’ women).

Even Hillary admitted there is a Christian genocide ongoing in MENA. Does anyone in power help? No. The rape of outgroup women is also genocide, because it prevents them from reproducing with their own.

The ‘men’ in power are weak and will be shortly removed.

Yes, they were raised by Boomers under cotton wool tactics but the pendulum is swinging back now. Replace Merkel with this woman.

If you look at all the Left wing demos over the past 6 years, there are increasingly fewer showing up and their fervour is dying. Look at the pictures, look at the numbers. I have seen this with my own eyes. The Open Borders protesters are actually the same people being coached into France or England as needed. It’s the same 50-100 people, over and over again as if to seem like there is wide support, as I covered in a Calais support post on their activities.

Every left-winger I know is shifting rightward on some positions.
The former gammas are still gamma, but quieter and they’re beginning to signal edgier positions.

The moderates are becoming conservatives. We’re battening down the hatches like a war.

Fewer men than ever are aligning with feminism, seeing it as a waste, and increasingly identifying with patriotic sentiments. (This doesn’t work for Americans because you pride your identity on a melting pot aka you’re doomed). Other identity politics still divides and conquers us, we are beginning to see national pride as the single point of legitimate, lasting pride. A house divided cannot stand and whether it’s male/female, white/tan, these divisive tactics are failing. The male/female Sex War is something the feminists want to rentseek and reduce the fertility of more attractive prospects. It is anti-society and Millennials are beginning to live up to our hero generation status, aligning with conservative family and economic values. There will be much screeching – because identity politics is dying. That’s the sound of the Left eating itself.

People are paying attention to the news, but not in the way foreigners think.
We’re using it as a starting point to research online and swap stories. We’re watching the videos and listening for names and drawing connections. We’re gathering intel in the calm before a very big storm. This is not mere passivity. We’re making history. The EU is supranationalist, we’re scaling it back down. The experiment is over, the gears are barely turning but the rest of you are yet to see it.

Links: The Evolution of Politics (naturalistic fallacy abounds btw)

Cooperative politics = Left wing
Prehistory = the time we genocided a bunch of other intelligent primates and ate them.
Not a single mention of r/K or mating strategy. Think they’re starting to get scared? Of the truth. From that point of focus on, they’re doomed.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/civilized-death/201512/the-evolution-politics-part-i

Ideas don’t scale. A tribe may survive based on genetic similarity, there is an extraneous variable causing the observed correlation. A whole continent based on the same principles would fail. See the EU for how that’s going.

“cohesive, smoothly-functioning social groups were central to the success of our species”

during times of famine, war and natural disasters for humans like the Ice Age i.e. when times were hard and lives were short (resource restriction). That speaks nothing of the ease conditions we have today and conflates the State of Nature with 21st century civilization (no, just don’t). A common good requires genes in common.

““In our view, this “gene-centric” focus fails to capture the full gamut of processes that direct evolution.”

Genes are measurable, we can look at them you daft prick, until you can categorically measure the other stuff, it will remain the focus and I needn’t listen to anything else those people have to say. There aren’t ‘missing pieces’, what sophistry. One of the issues with evobio, we have too many explanations. They are lying. To put my money where my mouth is;

  • “Missing pieces include how physical development influences the generation of variation (developmental bias);” novel mutations, genetic
  • “how the environment directly shapes organisms’ traits (plasticity);” how do you develop muscles? the body heals after stressors and this varies by the organ in organism, duh, basic incremental improvements over generations
  • “how organisms modify environments (niche construction);” it’s called mastery and caused by adaptation/reaction
  • “and how organisms transmit more than genes across generations (extra-genetic inheritance).” Loaded question, inheritance isn’t limited exclusively to the coding information packets we call genes. For example, cultural information is inherited.

This person tops it off with an outright lie covering for Kumbaya politics. “Whatever the multiplicity of mechanisms underlying evolution may be [DS: classic academic code for We Want More Grant Money], it’s clear that they often result in organisms whose behavior is decidedly cooperative and generous.” How is it clear? How often? Where? The Burden of Proof rests with you. Humans are still waging war. Other primates wage war. The diametric opposite of those things.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/civilized-death/201512/the-evolution-politics-part-ii
“Boehm argues that “egalitarianism involves a very special type of hierarchy, a curious type that is based on anti-hierarchical feelings.” That isn’t an argument, that’s an opinion, but okay.
…”egalitarianism involves a very special type of hierarchy“, everyone

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

It isn’t as if words have agreed upon meanings, is it?
FYI voting was about societal contributions in the form of tax, expressly how those were spent. Up until very recently, if you didn’t pay tax, into the pot, you couldn’t vote. Men simply managed the estates, including taxes. Women and all discounted men got the vote when the economy allowed them to live independently (20s era wealth) and manage their own taxes.

Funny stuff I couldn’t be bothered to post one by one

Have at it, edgelords.

11224419_938918619521919_8402171094571794812_n 11745605_988216801199533_3904693298741708620_n 11987065_925930050820776_3130580933450047091_n 12027540_1015334788487734_4965134366899045893_n 12032094_905745432837481_4554332056746301919_n 12063411_925492747531173_2182675891178269116_n 12079548_403613739835119_1264899095296688624_n 12096575_921818967898551_3320607395549351340_n 12105771_925007137579734_8727441773180586776_n 12106984_1064724686873268_1489383016275828954_n 12107236_1029079387113274_8488524656403080763_n 12108132_928598290553952_8337837995639016968_n

This is not real but give it time.

12111922_931734560240325_7012612762893086119_n 12115903_1694266527459321_8093779425164448870_n 12190045_931850030228778_4230665632203474206_n

They didn’t see his porn collection…

The first feminists have a point.

12191818_1200788569937958_7086678042078047685_n 12193290_927322877348160_3744963400245756783_n 12193594_932204790193302_416719579370758141_n 12196255_927737023973412_6930977041794099191_n 12227052_938219606258487_4902285838893784026_n 12227107_1248422925175299_2622509644577880727_n

Depends. There’s an event horizon beyond which they’re damned.

12247017_935363056544142_2578315497270550586_n 12249667_532735830222795_6998093609688308476_n

No other race willingly freed their slaves.

12274541_936990609714720_6302800410546344177_n bisexualwht champagnesocialist CR_lgXwWwAAU4za

He’s a sociopath, of course not.

equalitylosers fe129a649f8b4c9ce6190c93444a36af hater liberal doublethink liberal zone mgtow picture_php_pictureid_7482_e7415a1a41cb8d5e755d80b27dfa172ffaea1fda tumblr_n7y1faTYHF1t21lk6o1_500 tumblr_nmezd2ctk11sbdbx5o1_500 tumblr_nopctrQ7vY1r6r32ho1_540

Nobody is that hungry.

tumblr_nwytl3x0nN1rzhdsdo1_500

My future child.

tumblr_nxrs1vgOJB1r9qk1io1_500

Link: The European Cuddle Pile

What we’re approaching are the limits to peace. Peace means compromise and the promotion of odious regimes for far longer than they might be able to survive otherwise. Excessive cooperation rather than the grasping for advantage has made it so that the entire Western bloc has lashed itself together, so that when one of them falls, they all fall. When one of them makes a spectacular error, they all suffer (best demonstrated by Germany’s mass importation of Middle Eastern indigents within an open border zone).

http://www.henrydampier.com/2015/10/the-european-cuddle-pile/

A good metaphor for the EU.

Why I think the MRA/Angry MGTOW bitches will ultimately fail

Spectacularly. 

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

I’ve been asked this and it’s a fair question, this’ll be the one time I address the topic so I can leave it alone. To fail. On its own. Some joke about the entropy of sexual frustration.

What unites the two groups?

Condition 1:

“society is unfair!”

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

Life is unfair but go on.
Condition 2.  As I put it earlier:

wah wah wah Matriarchy is keeping me down”

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

Passive and unmanly but I’ll roll with that as premise.
The writing will be clunky, probably.

Why does modern society hate men?
Men fight the Government.

Think on that for a bit and come back.

Men don’t ask for things like women. Men overthrow, men topple, men destroy and war. They don’t need you for war anymore. What do they need you for, that they can’t get elsewhere?
If you are not willing to do those things, give your life to a cause, you are not a man and what you are defending is a luxury of the First World rather than a right. If you can live without it, it isn’t a right.
This is the point where they get anecdotal and apply injustice/victim mentality to areas of life that do not and will never apply to them e.g. the old canard, marriage is evil but I’m never getting married or women are dumb bitches I don’t need them why don’t they like me or my personal favourite I don’t need children where is my pension. 

Quick test: do they read the Victim Bible called The Guardian? If so, Pass Go and fuck yourself.

Let’s take the feminist metaphor that they want to use, to make the Government fuck men over further, but these guys keep agreeing with for suicidally stupid reasons: the Gender War. Let’s buy into their frame further.
Life isn’t a movie, it doesn’t matter which side is ‘right’, it is made by who has the biggest bastard on their team.
In this case, the Government. Who literally hold all the cards, and write all the laws, and hold all the guns (UK edition).

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

So what are you gonna do?
What can you do?
Sweet FA.

Government will crush the bitchy MGTOW and MRA agenda.
The equality paradigm (that isn’t fair! that’s discrimination bc I’m a man!) requires victims. The physically stronger sex cannot take a dive and fake an injury, this isn’t football. It doesn’t work. It will never work, whining delta, gamma and omega males cannot speak for their stronger counterparts, as feminists cannot speak for normal women. It’s called History. History is the proof men are not the weaker sex. Yet they keep going. At this point it’s embarrassing.

This isn’t all good for women and many women do not support the actions of Government, as many men don’t either (one of the issues with democracy, check out neoreaction some time folks).

The women who do (feminists) make a grievous error.
Women think Government will protect them. When things happen, SHTF, which do they need?
The sociopathic pen-pushers or men, in the street?
Yet they stab their guardians in the back and with crimson hands say “what happened?”. You became a concubine for the system. You are the whore for Babylon. That’s what happened. No wonder the men are doubtful. Distrustful. Some are just as bad though, and deserve no moral high horse, they deserve an ass. They don’t object to female parasitism, as long as they get a good, long suck off the State teat too. So it isn’t about sex. Sex doesn’t divide us. It’s about politics, it’s r/K. The fake MGTOW are the r-selected and want the world to improve around them, the real are K and want to improve themselves.
They want all the goodies too, to be ‘equal’ with feminists, with none of the responsibility too. Like feminists. They want a wife, all the cooking, sex, affection, kids but with none of the obligation, so they get a free hooker and call her a girlfriend. The girlfriend isn’t really giving it up for free, but he keeps up the pretense that it might get serious. To keep her, he must deceive her. He is the male equivalent of the feminist monster, who marries you to divorce you.

For the free hooker label;

What’s the point of a hooker? You enjoy their company. You leave when that stops.
What’s the point of a bf/gf, again?…

It used to be husband/wife auditions, there was a set timing to it, for courting. Now it’s a way for a man to claim a woman, like he owns her legally (wife), use up the best years of her life (youth) and ward other men off…. without commitment. Without any responsibility on his side.
And they complain about the societal decay, the fallout from this. Sure, there are many women on welfare, but how many of the fathers wanted to marry the mother of their children and financially support them? Are we all adults here? Do men deserve some moral exemption from a problem caused by two?
And you hear all these stories like “my gf cheated on me boo hoo” and it’s like, there’s no such thing. There are two relationship statuses: single or married. This is why men ‘cheat’ on their gf. They know this. What is the duty of a bf/gf? What? The idea is almost laughable.
There is no commitment that is not codified in law. She owed you nothing because you gave her nothing.

Counterexample: Same way a gf isn’t entitled to a proposal after X years. Or your money.

And which sex allowed it to become this way? Which sex allowed Patriarchy to decay and crumble?
Men. Men have only other men to blame.

Most of it, is that they wanted free sex. The primary motivation for men. Except nothing in life is free. So they had to give women excess power in exchange. If men wanted to reinstall a Patriarchy, all they would need to do is swear off sex with women. Then what? What can they do? What can they dangle as incentive, like training a dog? We all know they’ve got nothing, as a whore’s only value is sex. The MRA/angry MGTOW group are fighting against other men, sociopathic men running the system (and still blaming women somehow, which does make them misogynists). Do you think the sociopaths of the system really care what’s fair? What do you have to offer? You don’t have a pussy to whore out. You don’t have money. The tax system already took it. You’re already screwed.

Surprise! The Sisterhood lied to you to try and steal your prospects for themselves.

But go ahead, keep bitching about it. Like a girl. It makes you look really competent and adult.

Our elders are criticizing us because we see past their BS.

The rest of us are watching you and it’s quite funny. We lost sympathy when you started being stupid.
When it collapses, you’ll blame everybody but yourselves. That’s why it will fail.