pizzagate was a sham

there is obviously nothing to do with Satanism here

it makes me wonder if that Satanic panic in nurseries was onto something

Satanism isn’t a religion, it’s just anti-Christian.

As Vox said, they aren’t atheists, they’re misotheists. They direct their life to God, just hating him.

Black Masses involve two forms of worship over blasphemy – orgies (including rape) and cannibalism of innocents (babies, children, virgins). We know what they involve, Crowley also mentioned what was involved openly.

“the animal should therefore be killed” when they call humans animals, this is what they mean

Among other things, male pedophiles abusing boys. Is that gay?

“one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force, a male child of perfect innocence… sacrifices his creative power” [as does porn, another drain]

For people who go on about the power and right to their Will, they sure don’t want to be explored by outsiders or held responsible for their choices.

Satanists pervert the words of God. Those ‘points’ pervert Jesus’ teachings, they rely on your ignorance of the source like the SJWs who say ‘all things are possible’ when the FULL quote is “with God, all things are possible”. Their language is debased to push the cult of individualism, degenerate hedonism. Hedonism is Satanism, rebranded. Their version of weasel words like ‘respect’ is non-existent, there is no honour among thieves, no principles among sociopaths. They don’t have a conscience, they are shamed by nothing they do. The Pied Piper warned us about their siren songs of ‘fun’. Does a black ‘mass’ sound like freedom to you, or black tinged sheeple?

BAAAAAAAAAA, Satanists. BAAAAA and humbug.

This kinda apathy instilling trickiness (gaslighting, ‘we all think’…).

They are not deep and believe in nothing absolute. There is nothing there but druggy brainfog.

They believe in sin and no punishment, how convenient. Natural law doesn’t give a fuck about your feelings, there is no appeal. They’ll be shocked to learn hell is real. Even the indebted state cannot keep you safe from your consequences forever.

They aren’t supporting ACTIONS, they are getting you to agree with ALL acts in (((principle))) before specifyingdeception. If they said, for example, they have a ‘right’ to fuck corpses because ‘legally’ nobody owns them and pleasure>anything else, you’d be appalled. However, those principles are compatible with any evil acts. ANY.

Satan gets you to sell your soul before letting on what he’ll do with it. Goethe was a Freemason/Satanist.

Later, it’ll be:

What about muh freedom? But you said I was free to do as I will?”

Like a used car salesman adding on other shit after you’re sitting down. AND this AND that.

Conflation, obfuscation. Sargon naively assumes everyone has an above average IQ, a conscience and a limit. This is why the soft Left, all their plans and predictions fail. Where do you account for evil? What about the psychopaths, people with parts of humanity missing?

This is their ultimate outcome, carte blanche culture, aka call it consent and it’s okay! their game plan this whole time. Everything until this time was the warm-up.

‘Well, the corpse doesn’t refuse consent….’ – organ ‘donation’ and necrophilia, shit you’ll hear. Cos it isn’t graverobbing or rape unless they can say no, according to these people. Something’s never essentially wrong, morally bankrupt, evil, inhuman.

Do not FALL for Satanic taqiyya. They can say anything to recruit you.

There are four ultimate taboos of humanity: necrophilia, bestiality, pedophilia/rape, cannibalism. Anyone who attempts to justify or praise any of these is inhumane, a monster. Anyone who practises them is subhuman. Some people are born with a missing conscience, avoid them like the plague they are. When you can look at the case histories of various murderers over time, and know by default of the facts many of them were enabled, you can quickly ascertain why.

The consent thing re sex is gaslighting. Whatever happened to you, you must’ve wanted it, they say. We are told to have sympathy for the Devil, the Real Victim Here TM.

When in truth, the Devil has crocodile tears and enjoys shedding them.

Siding with criminals who violate human rights is the just world fallacy. If men, women and children ever ‘deserve’ to be raped then logically, so would all rich people ‘deserve’ to be burgled at gunpoint and happy people ‘deserve’ to be murdered. Taking people ‘down a peg’ is psychopathic sadism and the worst form of tall poppy syndrome. Being attractive is only a sin to insane people (Harrison Bergeron), God made humans healthy = attractive, to argue against this order is blasphemy. That is what blasphemy DOES. They’re amoral narcissists, using the words and knowing none of the meaning. They produce and sacrifice personally nothing – worthless people.

OT:

Why are real atheists so desperate to simulate faith?

Singularity – Rapture,

EMP – Revelations,

The Sims BS – your avatar body temple is God’s trinket box for a soul.

…..Why? They appeal quite seriously to miracles and demon entities (ETs) more than any Catholic I’ve ever heard. Irrespective of their feelings, calling God a programmer is actually the foundation of Creationist belief, the ‘intelligent design’ people are being ripped off by those who sneer at them. Pascal is laughing somewhere, call it a hologram if you wish to baby your own feelings.

The hippies are saying Oversoul – erm, that’s called God, we already have that thing.

They claim to have higher learning – from higher beings, they’re all Heaven-sent or deceivers.

They ‘meditate’ to their higher self – that’s a guardian angel or a prayer to Jesus (the humanity of the species embodied temporarily).

ETs are just a way to explain demons to idiots. White guys are uniquely gullible.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/

Obviously they’ll lie about their origins, obviously. Why take an interest in hairless monkeys? We are important – to God.

e.g. If people want to make the argument that the demons of classical exorcisms were people with massive mental disorders, then fine – it’s a terrible explanation for traditional reports of levitation, et cetera, but the Catholic Church is a propaganda matrix anyway, so this will merely be a side note.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal55.htm

In a neat little bow. I used to believe it too.

Incredulity can dismiss everything, eh reddit?

Nothing to see here

https://www.newsweek.com/cannibalism-animal-kingdom-ultimate-taboo-humans-1455287

Newsweek has always posted random stories trying to moral relativism literal cannibalism

Though accusations of cannibalism have often been falsely made to demonize groups, it isn’t absent from human history.

((groups))

“it isn’t absent”

So then it isn’t defaming them, it’s literally accurate.

As you can see moral relativism can only be used for good, not that good means anything….

my fellow savages

[And it’s literally demonic]

We suspect that we could adapt to human flesh if need be.

Reject “we” for this exact reason.

That’s one plan for famine, don’t delude yourself otherwise. If you disagree, they’ll eat you.

Our ongoing research with butchers in England suggests that they easily adapt to working with animal parts that the average consumer finds quite disgusting.

See the brainwash? Minty fresh.

Humans are not food, you fucking Satanists.

To any who push cannibalism: YOU GO FIRST.

As with any of this predatory bullshit. The r-types’ weak amygdala is the closest thing to evil you’ll find in biology.

Note: they don’t explicitly say it must be post-mortem. They’ll go after veterans and children having limbs amputated, any vector of profit for hospitals. They already sell baby back ribs. Part of the push for “organ donation” which, as previously covered, is just state enabled murder, medically.

You already have baby parts for sale openly online from the Moloch Chop Shop.

The Morlocks are aptly named.

Couldn’t paint ’em a darker colour, eh?

“Food supply, they’re human beings?!”

“Who are you to question…. 800,000 years… of ‘evolution’…”

Muh appeal to evolution, naturalistic fallacy, here it comes.

This’ll be Dawkins’ next tune after the pedo comments. Rationalization is a defense mechanism, a sign of faulty reasoning.

Quick power level check:

We are not a cute little insect . Humans are higher beings, spiritual beings (they know this) and all demonic practices are the same snare: to cut off your connection from God, to make you do one thing to mute the Holy Spirit within you. Ignoring the cricket, crushing the “superego” of the super-intelligence above us. It must be a choice to lose your humanity. Satan knows this. Look at the offer to Jesus. Seduction is the method of evil because it baits you to the hook of Satanism, whether they’re aware of it or not (look at the debauchery of clubs). To worship an idol like the Devil or “money” (the Devil in disguise), you must first reject God and isolate, weaken your gift from him. Satan exploits greed in a moment of weakness, uses your body’s instincts against it. It’s predictable. Temptation must be based on the physical to impair the spiritual sense of right/wrong, good/evil, God/Satanic. The conscience is not a physical thing really, it’s something we tune into like a radio signal via the soul. Psychopaths either have a broken antenna or no soul = subhuman. The seduction is always the same, a way to cheat. Promising ease and sloth, “fun” as the Boomers saw it. Rootless trees may feel liberated, empowered and free at first, but then they fall: wither and suffer and slowly die.

That is occult wisdom but not Satanic. They are not the same. It seems obscure but easy to understand once explained. Nothing dodgy or alluring about it at all. It promises hope. All you need do to strengthen your bond with God is ask.

That’s what I did.

Then I kept practically tripping over valuable information.

Our holy day has been changed and the name perverted into solar ‘deity’ worship, like the mad French King. Sun-Day. Idolatry. I’ve already explained how the ‘wages’ of sin are the karmic result of downloads from the spiritual ties or ‘ties that bind’, most intimately and deeply in immoral sexual acts. These parts of the Bible are seldom explored by the deceivers, they don’t want you to know. If you knew you’d make better choices, avoid disaster and the degeneration that follows sin. This is the reason why, the missing link. They want you to fall so they can save you. Like with this huge population, low food issue.

“”You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father He was a murderer from the beginning”

“abstain from every form of evil”

“And manifest also are the works of the flesh, which are: Adultery, whoredom, uncleanness, lasciviousness,” promiscuity/fornication is whoredom, adultery is mongrelizing

However, this would explain the motive for causing most of the world to over-breed.

Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.

Christians cannot support organ ‘donation’

They should push for organs to be lab-grown, which has no strings, but isn’t “free” for the hospitals.
At least in the 18th century, doctors waited until you’d been buried before cutting you up for the socialist “common good”.

Brain-dead doesn’t exist, it’s a guess, like brain “damage”.

It’s odd Americans will fuss about unborn babies but totally ignore ritual butchery of alive adults and children.

You are most vulnerable in hospitals, why did the oldest of the elderly avoid them so? How did they become so old?

The vultures even pressure parents of children with brain conditions with spiritualist New Age nonsense about “living on”. That’s abusive. You know the way they can live on? Not to murder them like yanking carrots out of a garden plot. Physicalism is a cancer, it flouts every religious system, which advises NOT to disjoint the body parts. It is anti-religion and threatens or shames people with religion (who believe in a soul).

The body can’t be “put out” if it’s “donating” and why would they waste pain relief on someone they claim cannot feel?

Bear in mind, neuroscience has proven alternate states of consciousness. Simple EEGs are not done.

Interestingly, if you ask to see the donor cards of a vulture saying what others should do, they don’t have one or it’s a convincing replica.

Then there’s memory transfer, some heart cells in particular have been known to act like neurons. They won’t research why because the families won’t give away the memories (Egyptian soul) of their relatives.

Yah…. cos THAT’s the point where it becomes evil, right?

Not that you’re betraying your relative or spouse to psychopaths too tight to pay laboratories for clean specimens with far higher success rates (more hospital trips and complications, they make even more money).

Two doctors can “declare” you brain-dead as you sit there reading this, grab the rib crackers (don’t look them up) and cut out your still-beating heart for someone THEY deem more worthy to live than you… and that’s legally kosher.

Legal, but not moral.

The SJWs willing to trust any shrink will probably meet that fate.

Declare =/= Prove

How to prove a negative?

The propaganda is heavily anecdotal, one-sided, emotional and vaguely fascist e.g. the government owns your organs.
https://www.kidneycareuk.org/news-and-campaigns/news/organ-donation-bill-passes-final-stage-house-lords/

Oh, openly fascist now apparently.
https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2019/march/royal-assent-organ-donation-deemed-consent-bill-signed-into-law/

This Bill, presented by Mr Geoffrey Robinson, will allow for consent to organ donation in England to be deemed to have been given by a potential adult organ donor before their death unless they have expressly stated that they did not wish to be an organ donor or an exception applies.

I’m sure “lost paperwork” won’t be a factor if your organs happen to be pristine.

Mistakes won’t be made.

You can’t sue to get the organs back, I presume?

And what about a surplus? They sell them. The family see no money.

This is often referred to as an “opt-out” system of consent as people may “opt-out” of becoming an organ donor on the premise that they do not consent.

Organ rape.

You cannot assume consent.

Libertarians are weak.

Objectification, humanity butchered to view us as meat. Everyone just lost their human rights, their property right to their body, and they’re so idiotic they celebrate?

At which age are you assumed to consent to being cut up like a hog?

The lamb praising the slaughter.

The Nazis weren’t this bad, how’s a baby to vouch non-consent? They ‘allow’ those donations. Placentas are stolen.

The NHS already promises you ‘first dibs’ on organs if you donate one yourself. This is evil.

You don’t need to go to Asia to be robbed of a kidney. Anyone thinking this is ‘nice’ can give their liver to the chavs down the road now.

Each according to his need, morons.

Old people aren’t informed, nobody got a letter about this. They’re just saying they can gut you.

The brain is the final organ to die. Hearing goes last.

Remember, the doctors are just following orders.

They brought this in because families kept saying No.

The Nazis were great humanitarians, they “harvested” so many organs.

“Fascism is capitalism in decay.” – Lenin

Video: Historical perspective

When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.

Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.

Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.

Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.

We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.

Correction:

If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.

That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)

The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?

http://www.parliament.scot/General%20Documents/CEYP_outcomes_06.16.pdf

Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890536/
The “care system” is systemic child abuse. I’m not being dramatic, I’m being scientific. It is a lifelong punishment without crime. Libertarians say nothing, for shame!

Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.

But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?

No, only if you wanted to sell them. 

Sorry, “financial incentives”.

We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.

Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?

*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.

Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).

Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?

Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).

Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned. What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?

Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.

A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.

So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.

Where is the logic here?

Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.

The state grows as the people wither.

** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).

The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.

The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.

It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!

At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!

They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.

That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.

Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)

These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.

They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.

Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!

This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.

You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!

Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.

MRAs need to make family courts public before any other legal changes can happen, idiots.

Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.

No court should be secret in a free society.

It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.

Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?

Stefan won’t touch this because he’s a coward.

[And America does it too. Land of the free (unless you’re a minor).
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/cwo
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/archive/cb/resource/report-congress-cw-financial-incentives ]