Monoculture Bible quotes

God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?

Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.

I’m not going through and finding them all.

https://www.biblehub.com/bsb/isaiah/65.htm
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”

THEIR descendants.

Their OWN descendants.

Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation

“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:

I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
https://www.biblehub.com/leviticus/26-16.htm

The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.

“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
https://www.biblehub.com/deuteronomy/28-22.htm

The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.

If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.

Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/78.htm
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above

and opened the doors of the heavens.

24He rained down manna for them to eat;

He gave them grain from heaven.

25Man ate the bread of angels;

He sent them food in abundance.

26He stirred the east wind from the heavens

and drove the south wind by His might.

27He rained meat on them like dust,

and winged birds like the sand of the sea.

28He felled them in the midst of their camp,

all around their dwellings.

29So they ate and were well filled,

for He gave them what they craved.

30Yet before they had filled their desire,

with the food still in their mouths,

31God’s anger flared against them,

and He put to death their strongest

and subdued the young men of Israel.”

 

Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?

He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).

 

“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;

despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.

33So He ended their days in futility,

and their years in sudden terror.

34When He slew them, they would seek Him;

they repented and searched for God.

35And they remembered that God was their Rock,

that God Most High was their Redeemer.

36But they deceived Him with their mouths,

and lied to Him with their tongues.

37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,

and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”

 

The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.

You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.

 

“38Yet He was compassionate;

He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.

He often restrained His anger

and did not unleash His full wrath.

39He remembered that they were but flesh,

a passing breeze that does not return.

40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness

and grieved Him in the desert!

41Again and again they tested God

and provoked the Holy One of Israel.

42They did not remember His power —

the day He redeemed them from the adversary,

43when He performed His signs in Egypt

and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”

 

Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.

This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.

 

“44He turned their rivers to blood,

and from their streams they could not drink.”

The Thames?

“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,

and frogs that devastated them.”

That one is funny.

“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,

the fruit of their labor to the locust.

47He killed their vines with hailstones

and their sycamore-figs with sleet.

48He abandoned their cattle to the hail

and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”

 

Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?

 

“49He unleashed His fury against them,

wrath, indignation, and calamity—

a band of destroying angels.”

 

only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal

 

“50He cleared a path for His anger;

He did not spare them from death

but delivered their lives to the plague.

51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,

the virility in the tents of Ham.”

 

The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?

 

“52He led out His people like sheep

and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.

53He led them safely, so they did not fear,

but the sea engulfed their enemies.

54He brought them to His holy land,

to the hill country His right hand had acquired.

55He drove out nations before them

and apportioned their inheritance;”

 

Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.

 

“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.

56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,

for they did not keep His decrees.

57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,

twisted like a faulty bow.”

 

Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!

 

“58They enraged Him with their high places

and provoked His jealousy with their idols.

59On hearing it, God was furious

and rejected Israel completely.

60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,

the tent He had pitched among men.

61He delivered His strength to captivity,

and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.

62He surrendered His people to the sword

because He was enraged by His heritage.”

 

Stop f-ing it up.

 

“63Fire consumed His young men,

and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”

I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.

 

“64His priests fell by the sword,

but His widows could not lament.”

 

Which book are they reading?

Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.

https://www.biblehub.com/1_kings/8-37.htm

 

https://www.biblehub.com/job/31-8.htm

“6let God weigh me with honest scales,

and He will know my integrity.

7If my steps have turned from the path,

if my heart has followed my eyes,

or impurity has stuck to my hands,

8then may another eat what I have sown,

and may my crops be uprooted.

9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,

or I have lurked at his door,

10then may my own wife grind grain for another,

and may other men sleep with her.”

 

Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!

The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.

Later:
“24If I have put my trust in gold

or called pure gold my security,

25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth

because my hand had gained so much,

26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance

or the moon moving in splendor,

27so that my heart was secretly enticed

and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,

28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,

for I would have denied God on high.

29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,

or exulted when evil befell him—

30I have not allowed my mouth to sin

by asking for his life with a curse—

31if the men of my house have not said,

‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—

32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,

for my door has been open to the traveler—”

note: not settler, the passing-through

“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam

by hiding my guilt in my heart,

34because I greatly feared the crowds,

and the contempt of the clans terrified me,

so that I kept silent

and would not go outside—”

crowded cities, huh?

“38if my land cries out against me

and its furrows weep together,

39if I have devoured its produce without payment

or broken the spirit of its tenants,

40then let briers grow instead of wheat

and stinkweed instead of barley.””

Briefly:

https://www.biblehub.com/isaiah/65-22.htm
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”

https://biblehub.com/isaiah/5-8.htm
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”

he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
https://biblehub.com/job/15-28.htm

“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/22-13.htm

 

It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”

“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing

except your own dishonest gain,

on shedding innocent blood,

on practicing extortion and oppression.””

Jer 22, btw

 

“21I warned you when you were secure.

You said, ‘I will not listen.’

This has been your way from youth,

that you have not obeyed My voice.

22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,

and your lovers will go into captivity.

Then you will be ashamed and humiliated

because of all your wickedness.

Why are he and his descendants hurled out

and cast into a land they do not know?

29O land, land, land,

hear the word of the LORD!

30This is what the LORD says:

“Enroll this man as childless,

a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.

None of his descendants will prosper

to sit on the throne of David

or to rule again in Judah.”

MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.

Remember, the people are the culture:

Psalm 127:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”

If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.

A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.

A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/they-dont-quote-this-line-2/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/07/21/context/

Quite a picture.

Is “homemaker” the new welfare queen?

PSA in case they’re trying this bullshit.

Rhetorical question, naturally.

Clarification:

Cook/chef is a job.
Cleaner is a job.
Working from home (for a company, yours or another) is a job.
Motherhood is a job. Fatherhood is a job. Nanny is a job.
Driver is a job.
Housekeeper is a job.

With me so far?

Home-maker …is not a job.

Sitting at home… is not a job.

Existing among four walls …. is not a job.

Stop.

Please, just stop.

We all do that. You are not special and have given nothing of value to the world, you have no insightful conservative thoughts by merely sitting in a house and occasionally tidying. We do that too! Full grown adults!

An “allowance” is a gift, not income. Legally.

There are also legal limits on how much you can get and they’re low.

You know who got an allowance? Playboy whores in the mansion. Were they ‘homemakers’ too?

And the way they normalise their husband’s financial abuse is pure cringe like sorry, he allows you to leave the house? Is this Yemen?

He allows you to drive? Is this Saudi Arabia?

You have curfew? Is this martial law?

He supports you…. doing what, exactly? What’s your job title? (Hint: On your taxes).

Creepy creepy infantilisation of a sexually active adult and we’re supposed to sit here and act like that’s normal.

No, that’s never been normal. Stop trying to make homemaker culture happen.

Video game addicts have more value to society than you. They assist GDP.

I bet they’re secretly camwhores the other 12 hours of the day they’re not cooking.

You replace your hubby’s need to order takeaway and? Walking the dog doesn’t take that long.

The past six months I’ve seen these hoes show up, all with the same routine:

*giggle* “I don’t have to get a part-time job! I’m so lucky!” *humblebrags for attention*

You mean, he won’t allow you? That’s illegal.

No one will be surprised when they eventually snap. Even dogs can’t be confined like that for long periods of time. They will go mental. Otherwise, rich idiot hubby loses the money at some point in the decade-long future and they either leave or she gets a job anyway like a self-sufficient adult.

THE HORROR.

And what if she’s widowed? Like come on, you do need a job or to be able to have a CV of some description, you stupid bitches. The state won’t treat you like the mental child you are.

This is all so disgusting. You know if the husband changed his line of work, they’d leave him too.

If he’s literally paying them to <exist>, of course they’re going to be speaking about husband in glowing terms… not because they like him! Not because they respect him! Not because they believe in marriage! Classic meal ticket!

Having a wet hole is not a job. If you can’t put it on a CV, it isn’t work.

This also goes for kept gay guys. A growing situation too.

They will need to earn a crust eventually.

After all those years (not-so-secretly) looking down on women who earn their own food.

Like a grown-up.

Or who’ll be expected to bail them out? Taxpayers.

Actual housewives don’t brag about living off their husband, they’re too busy contributing to the marriage. These bitches are unfairly yoked.

These people do not represent conservatives, we have correct time preference and plan things.

Who’s targeting who? Is it controlling psychopaths targeting entitled female narcs?

Marriage is NOT a status. It doesn’t make you a superior being. It’s a role.

Reminds me of this:

and this

Being the black section.

That is not traditional marriage, America. Women worked in ancient times, in Proverbs 31, they worked alongside the men up until factories in the 19th century, then they literally did the same work from home or in other factories. They didn’t just sit there 90% of the time.

You would be fired. 

Sitting at home with hundreds of hours of leisure time per month is not an occupation.

You’re a welfare wife. You are a trophy.

I don’t know a single married mother during the 50s who didn’t have part-time minimum paid work at some point. It is necessary. That was the 50s economy!

Bluebearding a woman with something more confining than prison (they can work and walk around outside without being questioned) is bound to end terribly at some point… and the SJWs will seize upon it to smear actual housewives and stay-at-home mothers and fathers.

I can see it coming. A mile off. I have warned you.

It’s a dysfunctional mini-commune model larping as right-wing.

They call it a job but get defensive when you ask if their income was on their tax returns…. like, yes Karen, that’s what job means.

It’s a legal term. Where’s your employment contract? Which tax forms do you file?

[I found this out by accident, inquiring out of genuine interest.]

You can’t just throw around those words or it’s my duty to report you as a domestic slave.

Is your home an LLC? Well, you called it a “business”, Karen. Words have meanings.

Workers also have to fully comply with national occupational laws and have job security.

Your husband or otherwise breadwinner can leave you at any time. That, in Russia, is called an “arrangement”.

Jobs are involved, but it is not a job.

This has been a PSA.

Fuck lazy people. Don’t call it a job. I can report you to the IRS.

Work minus worker’s laws = slavery. Don’t try me, Karens.

This is like a weird new cult thing springing up among conservathots and I want nothing to do with it.

It feels culty. Stepford Wife culty. Lifestyle ‘blogging’ is not a job.

They’re trying to hide their leftie laziness behind people with honest right-wing positions.

You are not a housekeeper because you open the door or an entrepreneur because you have social media to post the grandiose nothing happening and you stole a once-pure term to be a housebound thot.

Is this the new Pokemon form of gold digger?

Like the man doesn’t MAKE the home possible by funding it? Such shade.

It’s such a pretentious term over housewife. They’re 100% dependent on a man but act like feminists too.

Stay at home, sure but quit fucking gloating about it like you’re doing the world a favour.

Picture 1: my face. In the house.

Picture 2: my face. In the house.

Picture 3: my face. In the house.

Caption: women who use their sexuality are evil! I’m such a /nice girl, be “feminine” and useless to the world like me! teeheehee! 

You have literally accomplished nothing.

Cults of personality reee. Men don’t need to worship you for a magic ring, Galadriel.

You didn’t invent femininity and it doesn’t involve sitting around being a literal useless cunt.
There’s no such thing as an activist for anything, they’re all missionaries. It’s classic Crusaderism.

RUN.

It feels like narcissistic mothers in-training, spare the children!

The whole routine is fake, guys watching. All of it. Just listen closely for passive-aggression, weird statements and screencap the occasional lapse (every 2 mins) in the narc mask.

So much pings as out-of-place. I’ve been sitting on this waiting for these women to contribute.

[I am better looking than these women, by the way, it just pisses me off they’re claiming to represent ALL women the same way, suspiciously, that the SJWs claim to represent ALL women too. Fuck off we can represent ourselves, Saint Jolie 2. Bring the “community” together? Horse-shit. Conservatives don’t believe in multicultural utopia.]

White women just picking up the Asian waifu fake femininity bullshit. Complete with mannerisms.

You’ll note, for the court, that ‘being feminine’ entails doing all the things they wanted to do anyway and none of the things they don’t?

Cultural camwhores with pussywhipped rich idiot husbands. If it’s so fulfilling why are you fucking micro-blogging your every last excruciatingly dull thought? Why that urge?

I don’t post personal life on here because …. the urge never strikes. I don’t tell personal stories. I actually don’t get why they want to share any family business online. Why?

Relevant:

https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm

It also has various verses prohibiting prostitution and pride.

10 For even while we were with you, we gave you this command: “If anyone is unwilling to work, he shall not eat.” 11 Yet we hear that some of you are leading undisciplined lives and accomplishing nothing but being busybodies12 We command and urge such people by our Lord Jesus Christ to begin working quietly to earn their own living

I’m sure these saints with cunts know better than the Bible, right?

“14 Take note of anyone who does not obey the instructions we have given in this letter. Do not associate with him, so that he may be ashamed.”

Living off a man like a tick is so #trad, huh?

Same ones shaming other women for having a better figure? Missed the verse where that was evil, little Mrs Communal Narcissist.

They make all women look bad. Sainthood isn’t handed over as part of the marriage ceremony.

Imagine what they’ll be like in a decade or two. Wow.

There is no Sisterhood. Stop acting like you’re on my side. I see you.

Conservasnatch is still censorship Church missionary ‘feed the world’ bullshit. I see you.

This is just a sighting of the Old Crazy Church Lady before she got old, pretending her feminine wiles are better than sluts’ wiles.

They’re even playing Christian for clicks while reaching out to Muslim women. Go die in a fire, Karen.

Holy fire.

This doesn’t add up. None of it. Calling it out.

CHINOs don’t get to tell every other woman on the planet what makes them a woman.

Fuck off.

Welfare queens do the same thing. Sit at home. Me-me-me social media. Get an allowance.

Not a job.

If they claim it’s a job, report them to the IRS. I am serious. Especially if they’re getting shekels with the online homemaker routine, like that’s any less attention-whoring than a Kardashian with her tits out. Bitch, you ain’t better.

Jawline moving make-up

Since the fake eyelids revelation freaked enough of you out.

Yes. It is real. You cover it with foundation.

Notice how the mandible itself (the true jaw) cannot be compressed at the corner edges, except with surgery.

Why I don’t trust “contour”. It’s old theatre make-up, literally it is, to look like another person.

This is, according to her, “a small face”. As you can see, still square.


In a natural square jaw (see Jolie or Grace Kelly for white ones) the corner of the “square” is lower than in other women.

A higher-set corner, smooth (less bone) and curved jaw sweeping down to the chin is feminine.

 

I’m scientifically, indisputably correct on that point.

 e.g.  

THAT is a gracile jaw.

Finally, the angle of the face is important. She naturally tucks her chin to recess her face’s sides in shadow behind hair but she actually has a recessed chin already. That’s unhealthy, causes double chins but culturally encouraged.

It’s strange how this is suggested once you’ve watched that.

Square-jawed Hollywood women get Botox to reduce the muscular prominence of their jaw.
http://capeaesthetics.co.za/2016/04/12/botox-for-bruxism/

So it isn’t like Asians are the only ones.

And plenty of “White” Jewish girls are still pushing the definition of natural into absurdity.

Very natural, quack quack on, bitch.

A hallmark of that eye surgery is that to appear more doe-eyed, the best the surgeon can do is make the eyes look more distant from one another. This requires more surgery to open them out again, giving them that sexy ET look.

Ew.

Video: Excuses empaths make for narcissists

Urge to control hidden with lovebombing (being nice isn’t an obligation) and magically change the other person, killing the former person. Thanks, Disney’s Beauty and the Beast!

Validating bad behaviours as proof they’re needed.

Feeling superior for “catching” the predator they think they can turn into prey.

Resentment of common sense (if you don’t want them as they are, leave).

Passive aggression masquerading as gender roles (both sexes) e.g. 50s housewife incompetence or bravado complete with gaslighting put-downs around said incompetence.

http://things.justinthrelkeld.com/post/178624223456/maybe-50s-jello-food-actually-was-a-sublimated

Often they aren’t really empaths and covert narcissists pretend to be empaths.

Like autists and psychopaths (they confuse self-involvement with empathy).

Expecting a narc to love is like expecting a man with no hands to juggle.

A common female manifestation:

Intrusive people pushing into your life under the guise of “helping”.

Treating you like the problem (or a problem) and acting like your mother or shrink (power) when you made it clear you do not want this. If you were the problem, they’d want you to see a shrink or leave.

They don’t respect boundaries and try to force things as Being Nice. Those are the biggest bitches of all and to men, seem popular (and feminine, it’s fake feminine to seem less bossy) but women actually keep them at arm’s length with fake niceties to appease them. (It isn’t anything to do with appearance, contrary to what men can assume, as they’ll discover if they marry it).

It’s easy to spot Fake Nice women – does anyone take advantage of their “niceness”? If no, they’re actually a social predator. Real nice people hate the rep and people do take advantage.

It’s for your own good from such fake people is gaslighting, surely you know your own good better than someone you just met?

A common one I heard from men is “she won’t leave me alone, I feel like I’m being stalked!” yeah, because you are? If you tell someone repeatedly to back off and they don’t it’s harassment. I don’t cover female abuse enough but I feel uncomfortable knowing people may twist it or as if I’m speaking for experiences of men than just repeating.

Beige America?

You think I’m fucking with you, don’t you?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2015.1035145
Yes, a real study paper.

“This article examines the impacts of the race of the future theory on the U.S. population. By and large, the theory posits that the mixing of different races—due to the process of miscegenation, especially in marriage, cohabitation, or sexual relations—will blend all races, so much so that, in the future, the end result of this mixing will be a panracial formation (i.e., one race). In this analysis, the authors attempt to determine whether the mixing of colors currently happening in the United States will lead to one race and what the race of the future in the United States will “look” like.”

For once, I was not, in fact, fucking with you.

“One of the major conclusions is that, although the possibility of the existence of the race of the future has yet to be established, the degree of multiraciality in the U.S. population is rapidly growing (based on data and statistics from the U.S. Bureau of the Census).”

They’re planning this whether you like it or not.

Your tax monies fund this.

Behold your future, America.

Look long and hard. Such vigour!

Isn’t diversity your strength?

Aren’t you on the right side of history?

Don’t white people deserve to go extinct?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281431958_Race_of_the_Future_Mixing_of_Colors_in_the_United_States_Leading_to_One_Race

Simmer gently in a slowly boiling pan of fact.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/05/future-immigration-will-change-the-face-of-america-by-2065/
Remember, the most common nation to immigrate isn’t Mexico, it’s China!

Welcome to Asian-majority America. I’m sure you’ll be treated well.
They’re so nice to dogs.

The projected rise of Asians as the nation’s largest immigrant group has its own implications, among them potentially increased education levels. Among immigrants who arrived within the past five years, Asians already outnumber Hispanics, in part because of a sharp recent drop in immigration from Mexico.

This is from 2015.

This slowed Hispanic immigration also will have a longer-term impact: In 2065, Asians will outnumber Hispanics among all immigrants – 38% to 31%. (Today those shares are 26% and 47%.)

The increased share of Asian immigrants among all immigrants means that education levels of the foreign-born population could rise sharply, because Asian immigrants tend to be better educated. Among recent immigrants from Asia, for example, 57% have completed college, compared with 13% for recent Mexican immigrants and 28% for immigrants from other Central or South American nations.

Worship your new supposed high IQ rulers, don’t question it!

The rise of the Asian share of the immigrant population also could have implications for the political debate about immigration over the next 50 years. Americans today have mixed views about the impact of immigrants on society, but tend to have more favorable views of Asian (and European) immigrants than other groups, according to a recent Pew Research survey.

Other white guys are rolling over for some soypussy*, so you should too!

The survey also found that most Americans (56%) would prefer giving priority to immigrants who are highly educated (or highly skilled), compared with 37% who favor giving priority to those with family in the U.S.

Cucks. You can train your own people.

(and *soy sauce makes white men fat, sorry to tell you this)

https://www.ketodomain.com/keto-food-info/soy-sauce-safe-keto/

“Soy sauce also contains phytoestrogens. Phytoestrogens mimic estrogen in the body.”

http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/natural/phytamt2.htm
Phytoestrogen levels in various soy products study measurements.

Asian women with tits have just faked it by eating tons of (GMO) soy. That isn’t genetic, note the facial masculinity.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/neotony-isnt-an-asian-thing/

Transsexuals consume it for this purpose too.

https://feminizationsecrets.com/male-to-female-feminine-foods/

“Neotony” isn’t an Asian thing

If I don’t correct the pedophiles trying to feel normal, who will?

Humans are considered by some biologists to be a youthful looking species. We have weak (gracile) jaws compared to say, gorillas and large heads compared to say, chimps.
Stop trying to snowflake a biological possibility of prevalence.
It isn’t Asian or even characteristic of Asians (anime isn’t real!), it’s more prevalent in women than men (but common to humans) and can occur in Asians. However, most Asians have narrow, upturned (i.e. not round) and small eyes – thus cannot count under that heading. They are the least youthful on that feature!

You know, on average and before Daddy’s plastic pays for new plastic.
There are plenty of Asians who don’t have it (most by definition, attractive people are always a minority in their own population) and get the most surgery in the world to reset their masculine bone structure where possible in easy areas like the jawline and brow bone.

The technical un-PC term is “pedomorphic” so….

yeah…

Don’t go round telling people you find that hot.

Another error made on purpose by perverts?

Young isn’t the same as sexually immature. Men are sexually disgusted by signs of sexual immaturity so quit pushing that or show me some amazing, ironclad studies to back up your claim.

p.s. A fetish isn’t covered by sexual selection. Please stop getting evolution wrong, America! If you’d pass over the many white, black, whatever else women with larger eyes and smaller gracile (not under-developed/inbred/immature) chins then what you really have is Yellow Fever, a paraphilia (fetish). The Kibbe gamine type exists in all races and Asian culture expects women to fake it. So they do.

Youthful (but NOT immature!!!) features indicate health. That’s it. That’s all.
As in, an Asian looking really cute by plastic surgery with no waist, boyish hips and poor fertility doesn’t count under the biological model as fit. Because it isn’t real. Biology covers what is natural only. It also covers evolved historical conditions, new transportation and the race mixing that is possible isn’t covered because it’s novel. I’ve covered as much as possible that’s available to discuss online with the medical issues boyish women have with childbirth. If C-sections didn’t exist, a lot of Asian women would die, especially if the baby is half-white. Most women who go in for IVF are Asian (and have a higher failure rate than White women) and nobody knows why because nobody is allowed to study racial differences openly.

If they cared about these women, they’d study things to actually help them.

Fetishists miss the part about the eye shape and size because the common black eyes (again, contacts don’t count as genetic!) cue to their stupid brain that the woman is in love with them (pupil dilation) and not a threat.
Their cartoons look like white women, they get surgery/hair dye/makeup/skin glue/fake eyelashes to look like white women and their husbands cheat with Russian prostitutes. Actions speak louder than words.

What’s been called “psychological neotony” by some obvious pedophiles is emotional retardation and intellectual immaturity. That’s all retardation is, being stuck in an earlier stage of development. Humans have life stages, to not grow up is disturbed. They are just as bad as the vapid Valley girl.
If it’s vapid and stupid when white women do it, it’s the same when Asians do it. Stop white (yellow?) knighting. Fake femininity is obnoxious.
Neotony or in accurate anthropological terms, pedomorphology is allowed in society because we’re decadent, it is a sign of civilizational regression to encourage showy incompetence. It’s literally the female equivalent of the soyboy. They’re useless and act like children to get out of their citizen’s duties in life. And you’re falling for that?

It’s your life to ruin, I guess?

Black women have a tendency to act strong to get male resources, Asian women have a tendency to act weak to get male resources. White women can go either way with Eastern European acting weak and Western Europe acting strong(er).

But your hierarchy is fake science.

As a race, the “neotonous” features as characteristic belong to Europeans.
Show me a mathematical computer study that tops this.

Marquardt female ideal, sexually mature and youthful.

Proportionately large eyes, high, well-formed cheekbones, full but not huge lips and narrow mouth (youthful mouth indicator for femininity, not fullness which men have moreso) and a fine nasal bridge, soft brow bones and cherry chin, gracile thin jawline and thinner overall face shape closer to oval ideal, 2:1 ratio.

I drew this in case some bitch can’t do ratios.

Shapely philtrum (predicts uterine health), proportionate ears and nostrils (evolved to climate), healthy eye distance (neither too big or too small, beauty is healthy average because it shows a low mutation load)!

Fits closest to Europeans, matching up to corroborating dating site selection data and male preference attitude surveys who would preferentially date a European woman.

European fits it best based on youthful features, then Africans because they have large eyes and full lips and THEN Asians. The eye area is crucial for this. If you don’t have youthful eyes, you don’t have it.

One warning:

Looking like a baby also means looking like a boy, femininity is different. It is not childish, it’s womanly.

The classic beauty within her race does not look like a girl.

Femininity has certain features which coincide with youthful and healthy.

Women have longer, thinner faces including noses and paler skin than their racial male counterparts. This is constant throughout all races. Don’t look at models for an average, they’ve had work done.

Basic rundown for you to begin your own research.

I hate explaining the obvious. The white woman picture has filled lips, ignore that detail.

You might argue, where’s the Marquardt data for that?

Here’s the face-on beauty ideal for women from their global dataset.

Name that race.

Fully feminine and neotonous face with the contours shaded correctly.

Note the longer nose but more delicate bone structure (as opposed to yang angular).
Note the thinner face and reduced mouth width.

Basically everything above it.

Oval, check. Thin but not under-developed nose, check. Round curved brows, check. Narrow mouth with full lips (so incredibly proportionately feminine). Soft features including round normal eye shape, check. Heavily dimorphic, check. Long face compared to male average, check. Small but developed chin, check. High delicate cheekbones, check.

Example of those IRL.

This is so blitheringly obvious to me I struggle to put it into words.
I guess I’ve been trained to see this but did you never notice?

Really?

Pretty/cute/sexy are absolute shit compared to beauty.

Black women are higher on this trait of neotony than Asians and everyone talks about them like dirt when they don’t deserve it.

Africans have great eyelashes too, unlike the majority of Asian women.

The eye area is the hallmark of this trait. So African women can look great in 20s makeup.

I’m redpill which means I tell the truth, even when it isn’t about my own group.

Compare with the Asian standard model based on the dataset of averages.

Looks very masculine to me. Very angular, very strong, very yang.

No, neotony is the least Asian thing. I’m sure their surgeons will be pleased to hear you ever considered otherwise. One sign an Asian woman had surgery is that her chin now looks inbred and under-developed, like European royalty sometimes did.

Her larger Asian skull formed in the uterus and by chopping and sliding and trashing the bones to look more European, by proportion it now looks weird and doesn’t fit with the rest of the head’s bones.

There’s a definite look. Example in white people.

The chin looks weird. Not a good look.

Cute?

You can’t hide your real bone structure, even with surgery.

The skeleton is inside you.

The scourge of the bitter mother

I wanted to write about something for a while that really doesn’t help the right-wing and only appears to move Overton. I expect a lot of hate for this, but …fuck it. As you can see, it’s a taste of their own medicine. Judge not lest. 5,000+ words.

If you don’t like it, shake it off.

Nobody talks about it.

We all see it, nobody says a word.

Who are they?

The prissy mothers you see all over the internet, so full of scathing resentment of other women that it almost tinges the screen green. One of their favourite topics is rape. They will go on and on with a Just World fallacy a five-year old would balk at, victim blaming women for, basically, “asking for it”.


That… isn’t how it worked. Ever?

It’s like saying “don’t get burgled”, if they target you/r house, that’s it. The predator of man is man and the predator of woman is man and if men can’t fight off other men, what hope do we have?

Crickets from the women who think, genuinely believe, they know everything.

Their “advice” boils down to “don’t be attractive”… sorry, I didn’t realize I stumbled into a fat acceptance meeting?

With friends like these, who is the enemy, again?
Whatever you look like, the way men work, some of them will find it hot. Yes, even camo pants and bulky sweaters. Should I walk around in a three-piece suit like it’s sexual Kevlar? Some of us are so innately sexy, honey, whatever we wear looks good. Sorry???

Ah, but they’d find fault with that too, huh? The New Shrews.

Everything you do is bad and you’re a bad woman because they don’t like you.

No, fuck you. Fuck you and your abundance of time to tell other people how to live.

Some of us aren’t here for male attention and we were here first. Sit down, Sandra.

You hate femininity. It isn’t evil, it’s not sinful, it’s divine and beautiful and sensuality =/= sexuality.

The enemy pours poison in your ear to think otherwise. Genophilia is good too.

A woman in a nice red dress isn’t looking to steal your husband, calm down.
Everyone fears the Marilyns of the world (like Kibbe Romantics can help their bone structure!) but nobody suspects the real sluts, the Graces and Audreys and other yacht girls and homewreckers (true story). If you actually observed, the women who unapologetically dress like women (no hate) are typically the least promiscuous. What is there to gain, they’re already attractive. Do we ask men to hide their shoulders because a woman might fancy them? It’s absurd and socially oppressive. We aren’t savages and even they had greater freedom. Why would a natural, feminine woman want leftovers either, if they’re even looking for a man? However, desperate women (for sex or A Man or marriage) can’t get away with dressing for show because 1. it’s unnatural to them, 2. having no taste, they don’t know how and 3. they want less attention on their actions, such as sleeping around. This is common female experience and suggests to me these women never got out much. Or they’re veering to the mean girls end of the spectrum, like a clinical narcissist.

“If I can’t have it, no one can!” – crazy hoe

No contact lenses can hide those green eyes, babe.

They hate the signal (esp. of youth) because they don’t have it, not because it’s wrong.
This is the frenemy and we aren’t thick, we can sense it. They can actually gaslight women into feeling bad about their beauty, it’s sick. Nor does a beautiful girl or woman have a duty to sleep with anyone, it’s innocent visual pleasantness, what is up with American entitlement now? It’s obnoxious. Do they key sports cars too, are they these people? Do they stamp on daisies and kick puppies?

Your opinion has no basis in fact. Beauty is scientific and good.

It’s good for society and people who want to corrupt that innocence are the ones you should be denigrating.

As I read, and it always stuck with me, women were raped in a time of petticoats and no ankles, clothing has nothing to do with it. Predators go for body parts and it’s like saying we should ban kitchen knives because serial killers like them. In the First World we expect a basic standard of behaviour. This type of female, however, chooses to prod and cackle at the misfortunes of other (white) women. It’s cunty.
It puts people off the right-wing and makes all mother types look un-maternal (what compassion, such love), embittered and bored (constantly carping on about pop culture online). If all you do (80%+) is bitch, you’re a bitch – and this goes for the men too.
I’m tired of hearing the same strawman applicable only to middle-class American campus dwellers and Sex and the City groan-inducing comparisons. I’m sick of it. Please find a new fiddle and a different tune. The broken record is putting off me and I frequently shitpost on b.

Don’t make me meme you.
Get your ass to a therapist if other women (minding their own business) make you irrationally angry, that is insane. Misogyny is possible in women (self-loathing) albeit rare and racial loathing is presently more common but sexual, gendered loathing of the feminine (or of an action only when a woman does it) isn’t unheard of. The Bible calls it envy because it’s your in-group. God made femininity, who are you to say that’s wrong?

http://biblehub.com/mark/7-22.htm

greed, wickedness, deceit, debauchery, envy, slander, arrogance, and foolishness

All these evils come from within, and these are what defile a man.”

7/8 bitches. Off the high horse, time’s up.

Cut it out like a tumour before it kills you.

https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/green-eyed-monster.html

Why green? It’s poison, these emotions will stress your body and harm you.
They won’t harm the object that triggered you this cotton-picking week.

http://www.sensationalcolor.com/color-meaning/color-words-phrases/green-with-envy-2109

You’re not helping, you know you’re not helping the rest of us but worst of all, don’t care. It’s all about dem feels. And male approval from strangers on the internet, which is exactly what instawhores do too?
So don’t act as if you’re better than them. You need your narc supply just like they do. They get it from tit pics, you get it from bashing the women posting titty pics. Where is the good here? Do men really need to be told up isn’t down? Repeatedly telling men the obvious like they’re a retarded toddler is the reason they avoid you or are otherwise rightly suspicious of your motives. Bitching doesn’t add anything to the conversation and most of you are incapable of rational thought. You add nothing. Shouldn’t you be enjoying your families than dedicating 50+ hours a month to online shitposting? What kind of example does that set to the little ones? Oh, a woman has a career and she’s happy? Wow, how awful. Cue laugh track, right? Spinsters didn’t exist in the 50s! And nuns aren’t real women because they didn’t breed! The longer we look, the more it looks like you oppose the latter rather than the former. Why do you care? It’s a literal waste of your time, take up canning. Be useful. I laugh at genetic suicides as much as the next edgykin but there’s a limit and that’s about half an hour a month. Yet… this is ALL you do, all you contribute? Nah, fam. I’m not having it. Considering the odds of collapse and unrest, you could pop them out like a rabbit, have fifty kids by IVF and they could still all die in the next ten years. You’re not immortal because you have a pussy. Your plan isn’t foolproof, you’re foolhardy. I bet the doctor who delivered your baby was a woman or certainly the midwife and God help you if you need the help of a female engineer one day to fix your machines. Women contributing to society isn’t the issue. The way we do it doesn’t matter, the fact we do it, does. We could all sit around taking welfare for period pain and we don’t. There is an almost autistic obsession in these harpy women that conforms to the baby cult for privilege points and it’s ridiculous in historical context. You’re still outnumbered, look at Asian and African demographics. Your sons could easily, easily die in the next war. There is no laurel to rest on, the pedestal doesn’t exist. The work isn’t done once the midwife hands you the baby. Woman is a lifelong career.
I expect emotional incontinence from SJWs but I’ve tolerated it from supposed “tradwomen” for long enough.


Clean house, you sluts.
Fun fact: a slut refers to a woman who keeps an untidy home and/or demeanor. You are the epitome of uncouth. This is the true reason women can’t be openly right-wing amongst themselves, women like you. You’ll smack ’em down like a bug for trying. Where is the class? No, there’s only shame for having simple dignity like having nice hair or dresses.

This is you.

Getting into slanging matches like the slag down the road isn’t persuasion. If it’s an easy target, stop and think. The seekers who typically find these women first don’t feel the slightest warmth from the very people who could help them (maybe) but would rather beat them when they’re already down. Stunning and brave.
Women need to help one another, that’s what feminism was supposed to be before they stole it. Hating men is backwards, hating other women is also backwards. Both sexes need one another or society dies.
When I can feel the toxic waves of victim blame (tell the little girls of Rotherham that, you’re just like the social workers who told them they were hookers) and jealousy that a woman isn’t part of the Mombot hivemind by native disposition, even I feel deterred from certain ideas. Burn the witch! Shun the outcast! There have always been exceptions – Captain Obvious. It is fundamentally off-putting. It’s totally negative and offers no useful, practical advice. They fill in the blanks of a stranger’s life with a catastrophic worst case scenario (clinically unhealthy). https://psychcentral.com/lib/what-is-catastrophizing/
e.g.

>I can see her skin/shape
>She must be a slut

Sorry, do you live in porn? Are you from Pornland, where that isn’t a non sequitur?
Move to Saudi Arabia if the sight of perky breasts offends you so.

You know what proves a woman’s character? Her actions!

Shocking, I know! It’s called integrity!

A woman can have hypothetical power over men and never, ever abuse it!
(Psychologically: They know they would in the same situation and project).

Some of us have a moral compass. Fashions are based on social norms, practicality, and not individual choice. There will be people who hate me and pre-judge me for wearing heels and other people who like me for the exact same thing. It’s a waste of time caring. Pleasing everyone is impossible.

A woman could walk around naked (and if you live in Sweden, in their culture it’s normal) but if she doesn’t sleep around, you can’t insult her! Because she doesn’t do the thing! You can’t call her a slut or other behaviour-based insults unless she actually does those things. Otherwise it’s called defamation (there were/are laws about slandering a woman’s sexual honour specifically because other women are the main culprits, think Medusa’s punishment) and you’re a nothing more than a jealous, vindictive cunt.

Fact you can take to the bank.
(Yes, men do it too, so? Everyone already knows they’re bitter about what they can’t have).

I heard from a man once some piece of witty gold. He overheard some women talking about me (my dress was knee-length, people!) and I was upset about it. To console me, because they were really jealous over the fact he was there with me and felt responsible, he said:

“How do you know a woman’s attractive – without ever seeing her?” he grinned, leaning down.

“I dunno, how?” I said, trying not to cry in public.

“All the other women hate her.”

I laughed and it’s never bothered me since. Great riddle. Great man.

It’s true, they just want us to cover up and hide away. Is sleeveless banned? Are ungloved hands too pretty? A woman with good skin or even features must wear a face mask like some Harrison Bergeron costume party? What’s with the social acceptability of bitter individuals nowadays?

Another common, more overtly vitriolic one:
>own vagina
>expect to be raped


No. We fought wars over this. No. And does that mean men or little boys deserve it too? [No.]
In the onslaught of anti-white propaganda, the last thing women need is to be shamed for having tits by so-called allies. These snipes want other women to be ruined and traumatized for life because the idea makes them feel good. It’s twisted bullshit. It’s creepy how they salivate over fellow women’s hypothetical suffering “you’ll be sorry” style.
Were the women in Germany on NYE “asking for it”? No, STFU. Shit happens. You know who else thinks all white women are automatic whores? Muslims, straight outta the Muslim playbook (Koran). Such progress. Much culture.

If women are the greatest victims of this toxic culture, victim blaming is the last thing anyone should do. Does every woman have a man to protect her, family or husband? No. Funds to live somewhere safe? No. Money to buy clothing that doesn’t look High St i.e. a little bit trashy? No. They don’t care about the truth, they care about being sadists and stamping down women. I can’t be doing with control freaks, it’s so Mrs Grundy. I waited years to bring this up.

Slander is a cancer. It’s the hallmark of postmodern morals. Don’t do it.

If you’re going to take the moral high ground, you don’t get to sneer from it. People found you because they wanted help, not yet another woman-basher finger-wagging and trying to hide behind the pitiful criticism shield “as a mother”, the shit-tier right-winger’s As a Woman…

Being a mother takes nine months, being a woman takes a lifetime. Being a good woman comes before everything else. Is anyone else done with the Pharisee Matriarchs? I’m just fully done at this point.

I’d like to plop those women down in front of some of the infertile women I know and make them tell them, to their face, why they’re a bad person. To the women and wives who cannot afford children yet and refuse to be irresponsible burdens on the taxpayers or their husband. These are real people you humiliate in sweeping statements, like you know their life. How presumptuous and ugly. They don’t dare start on men, more worthy of scorn, who sit around drinking, hollering, deadbeating. No, start on the easy targets. You’ll really get women to look up to you that way…

Face it, you aren’t tall enough for this ride. Hop off the bandwagon before we chuck you.

These women have privilege, sure, I haven’t seen a single one of these women who isn’t firmly middle-class. Your comfort is not the norm and your assumptions are frankly embarrassing. You’re out of touch, how nice that you have an 18-acre farm and don’t need earning potential, but shut up and let your husband do the talking like the Bible says. By the way, I’m 99% sure he visits hookers on the side like most married “conservative” men who spend their time verbally opposing “degeneracy”. “We live in a society…” doesn’t really work when I can almost see your husband cringe behind you.

Twenty years ago, these women would just be bashing men. It’s only now white feminism has turned on their page 3 hating kind they magically find the right. How convenient. They’re so principled.

I’m waiting on one of them to eventually get sued for providing medical advice without a license and lawsuit insurance (all doctors have).
Telling people they have to have children could actually kill them, maternal death happens.
The “disclaimers” you put on videos and such don’t actually count? A judge would laugh at you. If you have a channel and hundreds of hours of footage devoted to guilt-tripping women into getting pregnant, yes, you knew what you were doing. There is a very clear motive.

Expert is that way of behaving, intending that people do exactly as you say. I’m very careful to look like a raving nobody despite having real authority. Crazy like a fox. How many fell since I started? Still here.

Showing is fine, telling is legally binding.

You wouldn’t tell them to go base jumping because oh, that’s dangerous!

It isn’t as if maternity services are lacking or non-existent, is it? IS IT.
It isn’t like labour is to women what war is to men. The most common cause of death or injury.

You can’t play leader without some real culpability. Yay for being treated equally!

It reminds me of the PUAs who think putting up a sign about recording in their bedroom legally counts, when porn actresses need to sign a model release (to record) and legal distribution rights contract (who gets to see the footage). Idiots don’t know their law and it’s your own fault. Arrogance is illegal in many forms.

The fact you filmed without legal consent means the whole interaction is unconsenting!

Back to the scourge.

Those women are not good mothers, I can tell you now. These women act like saints because they’ve pushed a baby out of their twat with an epidural. Your fertility is not an accomplishment and fertility is neither a sign of moral grace. “As a mother….” type, pretentious and sickening. It isn’t about the politics, it’s about the attitude. It’s ugly in lefties too.
I waited and waited, hoping for a natural evolution of the dialogue.

If all we can do is bitch about pop culture and insult other white people, we’re already dead.

Where is the prosocial focus, people? Where is the building one another up?

If a woman gets the instilled sense nothing she ever does is right, feeding that won’t make her listen.

Where’s the discussion of quality? You might be married yes, but to a piece of shit, we don’t know? Show us! Just getting a ring on your finger isn’t the status symbol of old, there are plenty of dirtbags buying a Moissanite ring and lie that it’s a diamond, as if that metaphor doesn’t show you how far we’ve fallen as a civilization . “Passing off” is illegal? That’s grounds for divorce, honestly. Traditions exist for a reason. Where’s the filter here? Crickets on the subject. Helpful. Don’t even bring up the savagery of lust matches, that might make unwise people question themselves and we can’t have that! Anything but that!
We don’t have the courtship rituals or family filtration anymore, plenty of trash get married in Vegas. There is no innate status to marriage anymore due to this ease, you aren’t necessarily a better person for it. In spite of this, oceans of smug.

Er…

Why?

Really, why?

I haven’t seen a single person address why. I’ve seen a lot of footage.
You just stand there, smug because you got married. No rhyme or reason.


Something that happened to you. All the agency of a stump. Lefties, at least, are smart enough not to be smug about a party that happened once. It isn’t a big deal. If you swore never to divorce, we might care.
Are you superior to Newton, Joan of Arc, Sappho or Tesla, then? They never got married and they’re more valuable human beings than most who will ever live.

It’s such a superficial way of viewing it.

Married = Moral.

No? Plenty of awful people are married. Your contribution isn’t that. It isn’t even children, no shortage of shitty parents in the world. And what do women do once the kids grow up, wither and die? Grow warts and become witches in the outback?
Is a woman’s only contribution her loin meat? Don’t children and older women contribute anything to society?

Crickets from the gobby girls. If it isn’t ALL about them and their “lifestyle”, they don’t care.

Like everything in the world will magically become good if everyone is married?
I don’t have to test your IQ to know it’s low if you really believe that.

Before somebody asks about the traditions, it’s logical proof of gender role success:

If a man can’t afford to get engaged, he can’t afford to get married. If a man can’t afford to get married, he can’t afford to “keep” a wife, as it was commonly well known. He certainly can’t afford to raise kids, plural, (3-4+) if a tiny diamond is out of reach. She isn’t working, right? Single income, just like you wanted.

h/t the snarky conservative with Dixon Diaz

And why diamond? Well, you intend to be married for life and pass on the stone to your daughter, don’t you? Everything else cracks. Americans don’t remember but Europe does. Look at the antique market. Plenty of diamonds, hardly any other stones. Emeralds, considered a coloured diamond, are rare choices because they scratch to buggery very easily. Try doing your research before vapidly deferring to “women are crazy”. I’ve had to help male friends shop for engagement rings and they were shocked it was so logical (always spring for the comfort band, guys).

There used to be entire books (h/t WM A Alcott) about how to be a good husband, it was a whole genre! Men would take decades, growing up and learning, training. And you think…. turning up?

~whispers~ I don’t think so.

Husband doesn’t mean what you think it means. There are plenty of good bachelors and plenty of adulterous scumbag husbands. Go outside once in a while.

These snooty housewives can be just as hypocritical as the SJWs, ignoring any data they dislike. Anything that’s complicated, unknown or hard to think about, they reject out of hand. It’s weak, I’m done sitting here silently waiting for women older than myself to get their shit together. They fawn over men for existing (sad) but hold women to impossible and contradictory standards. That is not healthy. It’s just as sick as the culture we grew up in. Get your act together and get over yourselves.
And they’re never great parents, always average at best. Like, if your life’s gonna revolve around something (or your ego): be dedicated to it. Read the research journals, cookbooks, encourage the best of both daughters and sons – don’t just do the bare minimum 50s housewife LARP in a frilly apron and act like everyone should kiss your feet for it.

They de-sexualise themselves like the Virgin Mary in a pathetic bid to get respect.
That doesn’t work. The fact you care so much about strangers’ opinions means you won’t get it.

I feel like posting tits or GTFO because they expect all the rapt male attention of jiggling D-cups and bring none of the substance. Okay, you …exist…

???

Now what?

Shouldn’t you be spending this time with your kids? Friends? Hobbies? Church?

You don’t see African women popping out eight kids acting like Gaia incarnate.
I saw a pregnant photo of Spencer’s Russian honeypot and I just burst out laughing.
She actually angled the shot so it looked like the sun was shining out of her belly.
That’s narcissism Beyonce would be proud of. I’m fairly certain it was heliocentrism, the Sun does not, in fact, shine out of your vag.
The Disney princesses aren’t married for a reason. You’re not important anymore.
This is an attitude problem which stems from callow pride and is also found among the ghetto. It isn’t classy, please stop.

“Oh, I cook my kids’ food!”

…. you’re SUPPOSED to!

The virtue signalling is obscene. “Well, I never had a one-night stand!” Neither have most women currently or in all human history. Your point?

They act as if pop culture is real. Look at the stats. No, it’s fake. Get out more.

Not that I let men off the hook. The man who acts like a hero for not being an alcoholic at the bar and spending his time with his children is literally doing the bare minimum also. Co-parenting is a trendy word for being.. normal. Children need a lot of time with both parents. Men don’t get to skip off to a club or hang around with their friends more than their wife. Neglect is a form of abuse, guys.

“The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife.” 1 Cor 7:4 When you marry, your time belongs primarily to your spouse. That’s the “commitment” part. I don’t get to take a job, turn up three days of five and wonder why I was fired.

Another common topic is clothing, as aforementioned. Because when the Queen wore that low cut coronation dress, she was such a skank. Because shaming the female figure is helpful for our purposes in encouraging women.
You disgust me. Unless you’re wearing a niqab, some man somewhere will find you attractive and according to the Bible, it’s his fault. Are you holier than the Bible too?

Before someone tries to @ me with a quote like I haven’t read it, should women have long hair?
I think a woman should have long hair as long as it wouldn’t be dangerous to her and as long as it’s more flattering. Now, how many men with #opinions on long hair, have never had it? You have to tie it up, you have to pin it back. Braiding is an efficient way of keeping it clean and neat. So when the Bible slags off braiding of the hair, what they mean is the three-hour updo with a solid gold pagan headpiece when your husband can’t afford it. [1]

Pictured: probably out of most budgets.

It does NOT extend to keeping it up out of food (she cooks, right?) or away from machinery so she isn’t scalped (you like her scalp, right?) or clean and not covered in baby vomit. The feminists don’t get everything wrong, you know. Just most things.
While I’m on my high horse for the season, the Bible does actually tell women they need to work. Stupid Yanks confuse this with taxable income. Per hour, housewives work more total hours than their husbands.
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/chapter4/chapter4.html
Acknowledge the work women already do, because the State sure doesn’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unpaid_work
“In the United States, the latest available data from 2014 shows that women undertake 14.58 hours per week on household labor.” Gee, why are women entitled to alimony? Almost like wife is a job! It’s “free” conditional on the lifelong union, because home management is really a full-time management job, if you’re doing it properly, hence the jarring pricing once the union is dissolved (by the State, not God). Investments have value.
Women are supposed to work as hard as men, equally yoked, it’s in the Bible. (Proverbs 31:13 on) we must pull our own weight, independence isn’t some newfangled (Jewfangled?) invention from the 1960s, women entered the workplace always. If she’s going to do that work anyway (say, the increasingly popular flexitime from home) who are you to a tell a marital union you have no part of, that she can’t earn money from it? That’s between her and her husband, it’s nothing to do with some judgmental opinionated nobody whose only qualification is a vagina.

I don’t see them pining over the deep meaning of Timothy. “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.” Applies between women n’ all. That’s the job of her family. Even if you’re related to a woman, you probably don’t understand her situation from the outside and if you aren’t going to physically help, shut up! The nag talks and talks and pretends they’re helpful, really they’re emotionally venting and trying to look good. Das pride.

1: It is also important to dress and act your station. The modern obsession with dressing poor is rude if you aren’t because it makes your family look poor and your husband look like a failing provider. Read old books.

Corinthians also discusses why not everyone is suited for marriage “I want you to be free from anxieties…” and personally, I don’t think any of these women have a right to sneer on the celibate. No, your baby-making twat doesn’t make you morally superior to a woman who acts like a nun (and look at the stats, it’s common to not sleep around now). Defaming other women is expressly condemned throughout the Bible and it’s sick to see women calling everyone who isn’t exactly like them a whore, basically. God made your body, don’t be ashamed of it (just don’t flash anyone either). This isn’t complicated.

Would I want to be friends with most of these women, I think. And no is the inevitable answer, they are quick in temper and scorn without due consideration and reason.

“She does him good, and not harm,
all the days of her life.”
Shouldn’t we expect the kindest behaviour from woman to woman?
If you’re going to be a cunt, at least be somewhat practical and recognize the reasons and exceptions, Jesus Christ.

Jesus didn’t dropkick the fallen but you wouldn’t know from how they behave and give all of us righties a bad name.

Mommy blogs are the ideal: helpful, practical and sanctuaries from the reminder of degeneracy.

Up with Mommy blogs and fashion blogs and home decor blogs and hell, female DIY and natural science blogs. Down with preachy whiny Domestic Goddess nauseating delusions of superiority.

Speaking about good women like they’re shit is bad for the cause, shame on you, Brutus.
It only gives men and foreigners an excuse to treat us like it too. Judas got paid, Patreon whores.

They are obsessed with finding people they are allegedly superior to, I’m bored now.

“I’m not like the other girls tee hee hee” is over.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/my-xtmas-wish-for-you-please-please.html

Hatred is broadly speaking a waste of time, unless you need it to feel normal.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/the-red-pill-must-indeed-be-pill.html

“Those who talk most about themselves having-been Red-Pilled are examples of ‘false-awakening’: still asleep but merely dreaming that they have awoken”

I don’t think new readers quite understand how often I take the piss out of myself.

This is a shit blog and entirely pointless, we won’t change a thing. I know that. You won’t change a thing either. At least I don’t do the grandiose thing and put my hair in rollers to appear in a Youtube video with a face like a slapped arse.

We have limits.

Narcissism in the Family

The covert narcissist will pull others down to feel better about themselves. It ain’t right. This simply isn’t cricket, ya hear?

“Though the narcissistic father is a formidable bully, I suspect the narcissistic mother is, in many ways, often much worse, if for no other reason than that she can cunningly exploit the stereotype of the angelic, saintly mother who criticizes her victim only out of ‘concern’. Remember that while we normally think of narcissists as self-absorbed egotists, many can come across convincingly as selfless and altruistic, all for the purpose of gaining narcissistic supply from being thought of as such saintly types.”

http://unitycounsellingservice.co.uk/understanding-narcissistic-behaviour-narcissist-hates-others-happiness-joy/

They laugh at women for their special qualities, I think that was the obvious thing. Yes, there have been plenty of female geniuses, read a book and stop giggling about women “acting like men”, the brain doesn’t work like that. For example, IQ is more dependent on white matter organisation. Guess what women have more of?
You aren’t cool, you’re ignorant. You aren’t edgy for telling white women they’re dirt like the media does. None of this stuff is as simple as you make out, once you actually look.

Read something that isn’t a magazine.

The stereotypical housewife is an ignorant shrill cow and you’ll filling it to a tee. It’s a pox on the pro-natal right.