Especially when it comes from tarts in full-face makeup who have videos about not wearing a short skirt because it isn’t modest.*
Remove branch, bitches.
You can’t preach something unless you live it.
These are original virtue signallers, fake Ks, paper Ks. Listen to what they want – control. They dictate their version of the Bible as the only one. That isn’t following the Bible, that’s following them pointing to a Bible if you dare questiion why you’re doing this.
Wolves in sheep’s clothing indeed.
A person with truth, let alone divine truth, doesn’t mind being questioned.
On another video they misunderstand male logic. They assume heterosexual men don’t sexually look at beautiful women. Really that stupid (but actually a practical excuse to shame ‘sexy’ women….to a man that could mean anything). I felt like mentioning this. They never question why even fully-clothed women are harassed, stalked and raped. Why do men keep photos of clothed women or just their faces? It has nothing to do with what you wear, the Bible says not to look with lust (ogle), it doesn’t blame the victim and say you shouldn’t be seen with lust, the first part nips that in the bud and it’s something women have no control over. How many kings are led astray because the sexes were reversed?
Fake traditional women are atheist, it’s like a shiny dress to play Good Girl like a priest outfit has the collar. They seek attention and that’s why the fucking YT channel of fake pep and perkiness (you are not girls, the word doesn’t exist in the Bible, it’s a 20th century use). This Holier than Thou No True Scotsman Bible-Pointing atheism is code for Future SJW, when they can conveniently (see how that works? never wrong) claim to have lost faith or that God abandoned them (sure, it’s God’s fault you’re weak). They will turn on you when it suits them. They believe if there’s no societal punishment, it must be good. Consider how dangerous that is, as friend or more.
What do they omit?
It’s narrow to say the Bible was the first historical source of those philosophies, however true.
Everyone who actually studies hermeneutics will know it’s ripped off various texts, including pagan ones.
The Bible says to test something to know if it’s true. If it conforms to nature and natural law (what religion shoots at) then it’ll match. Otherwise, falsehood or mistranslation, look again.
They tell you to accept blindly the hundredth version of a culturally bound book. Faith is blind, your actions shouldn’t be. This emphasizes thought process when they cannot think and what is claimed against what is done.
God’s word is tricky to define if you look to theology. Where does it stop? All gospels written? Papal gospels? Monk and nun philosophers? Saint’s proclamations? What to do in cases of conflict? They answer none of this, indicating they have thought of none of it and understand none of it.
Parrots are not people. God is watching. God knows your heart. In good faith doesn’t refer to brain, it constantly refers to heart. That’s an Egyptian and Greek concept, btw.
Even in the Bible, it says not to trust anyone who adds to it. After it.
OK, what about other books? The Bible isn’t one book, stupid Americans.
They think they can dominate the Word by saying Muh 3 types of women giggle giggle, making me sick with the fake laughter and chirp. Cackling Jezebels salivating at an opportunity to cause others to stumble. Where’s the positive advice? Hell, where do you get this three types from?
Nope, according to everything I read directly, you’re either a Christian or not. CHINOS, fake Christians, count as nothing, potentially much worse for being hypocritical and thinking they can trick God. What worse crime is there than that, it’s a form of perverting and insulting the Holy Spirit.
I’ve long since come to the conclusion that Americans cannot read. They need to be spoon fed and have everything spelled out, the novels have it – no such thing as subtle. They’ve turned rudeness and simplicity into phony virtues – bravery and minimalism. Where is bravery in that context or the 7 virtues? The opposite of minimalism is humility that you don’t know everything – Greek again, therefore you literally cannot follow all of God’s will because you will never know the full mind of God. See how quickly this exposes blasphemy? Where did they quote the Bible? Not once. How many times did they say Bible? In places it acknowledges it contradicts and takes a lax approach on things that don’t matter if, and I mean IF, your heart is true.
Does their heart seem true to you?
Back to reading, OK, you might say: tell me how.
Understanding the spirit of the time and the historical context allows you to READ the Bible. There are no conflicts in this way, only case studies.
Yes, God’s law is very literal.
It never ends. You don’t stop studying. This won’t diminish your understanding or enjoyment whatsoever. There’s nothing to lose. Medieval scholars didn’t limit themselves to canonical text, did they?
..How can you preach something you don’t know yet?
They want a protector, a shield. They don’t want a husband. How quickly would they divorce him, citing bad faith? In itself, that’s a loaded die of bad faith argument. Bible says to bring into the fold and leave be, not to abandon the flock.
These women are more dangerous than prostitutes for that reason, they pursue the good with evil in their hearts.
What did the Bible say about women preachers?
Granted, there are passages you may interpret in favour.
Still, to be on the safe side, why isn’t your husband speaking for you?
Well… that’s the Sisterhood of feminism, in practice.
You don’t get to giggle that you’re superior then.
*Modest is culturally dictated based on the society and your position. You dress neither higher nor lower than you are. This is etiquette 101, not being fake. Makeup that makes you look a totally different person is also a no.**
It isn’t modest to cover head to toe nowadays, it’s false pride. Don’t be Pharisees.
Look up the old etiquette books, they explain you must fit your role, including apparel.
Ya gotta be authentic.
Why do they dress like clones in their society and culture, if they’re expressing something unique?
People trying to control you in the name of Cause don’t want that.
**Ancient men wore more makeup than the women because they were outdoors more often, look it up. Eyeliner at the very least. It isn’t sexual, it’s health based. Yep, Jesus probably rocked guyliner.
Remember, back then Romans sported miniskirts and went nude to fight.
Nudity isn’t sexual.
Art tropes are interpretations of, not literally the Word.
So where the Hell do they get off lecturing on modesty?
How do they think Jesus bathed in rivers? Men wore full-length clothing to protect themselves from the Sun. In the Middle East. Go to the Middle East, no SPF. Go see why this was commanded.
If you disobeyed then?