Short and tall women are slutty

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490900700405
h/t Dutton

I wish they’d look racially, but this explains the r-selected LBFMs.

https://www.academia.edu/32121636/Height_among_Women_is_Curvilinearly_Related_to_Life_History_Strategy
Tall women I have noted, like Tilda Swinton seem to be left-wing in an openly aggressive, manly fashion.
Short women tend to be left-wing in a subversive fashion, i.e. infantilising rape gangs and cheating on their simp of a husband as a “poly”, the type to know they can’t play the tall woman’s game of leftism so fakes femininity to extract resources (from State, Church, simp). Assuming a short woman is more feminine is statistically wrong. She’ll be more likely to cheat from insecurity.

re Keller, M. (2013). The Genetic Correlation Between Height and IQ. PLOS ONE.
I already knew taller men are smarter and kinder to women, they’re protective. That’s why women like them, not the height per se.
Short men view women as social competition so are more likely to bully, gaslight, verbally abuse and hit them. They think domination makes up for lack of dominance. It’s moral cowardice, “pick on someone your own size” as they used to say.
Nature made taller men healthier because they’re generally better people.
Misogyny is a known factor of inferiority and most of them (with vitriol aimed in-race) are shorter than the women or average man, so subconsciously hate their mother.
Height in a man is broadly like a human’s peacock tail. It develops as a signal of genetic quality which cannot be faked and demonstrates low mutation load. There’s plenty of time before the growth plates fuse to get adequate nutrition and exercise so either their parents hate them (and parents hate more ugly children or products of other unions) or they are burdened with so many mutations it’s a small wonder they weren’t miscarried (and probably would have been without modern medicine).
One big reason modern humans are uglier is IVF, the other being maternal care for parents who simply don’t deserve it.
Read into that what you will.
Maybe the solution is more abortion, but more eugenic abortion.

Average height women have “more reproductive success” (Nettle, 2002) – cited top paper.
This also applies to the third world (they cite). Perhaps the fetish for pedomorphic women (short women, short limbs) is an r-select feature?
Men always prefer women a few inches shorter than them as a norm (so probably same class, assortative) but “markedly” short (as the paper puts it) is abnormal and suggests r-type breeding preferences (young and done, no investment).
Tall women are less symmetrical, although the way they write that sentence up is vague to spare blushes.
Medium height women have “highest mate value” – more studies needed on this. What does that actually mean? Just fertility? Beauty? Personality? IQ? What? Good family?
Jealous women were “taller or shorter than average” – damn, dare you to do a cross-racial study, that would be funny. 
So if you don’t want a harpy guys, select an average height woman (for her own race, presumably, also your own?).

If you wanna be cucked, women, marry a short man,

-or men, marry a short or tall woman.

Short is clearly a non sequitur to feminine, as it states short women are more jealous (along with tall women) of “feminine” beauty.

Average women are more repulsed by masculine women but… isn’t everyone? Can you guess my height by that?

I actually thought that was just everyone.

A few screencaps:

  • Humans are K-selected as a species, believe nobody who says otherwise. No, men are not meant to “sow oats”, it’s degenerate. The quality men don’t do that. Reputation evolved to explain this commentary on your genetic quality.
  • K-types are MORE reproductively successful in the long run, as you’d expect. Evolution is about the long run and who actually reproduces, not just “screws” in completely sterile fashion.
  • Married isn’t always better for the children if the parents (or one) are unstable, in loyalty or sanity.
  • Problem children come from problematic parents.
  • If your child is a slut, it’s your fault.
  • Sex is a physical distraction from growing up mentally, usually escaping from childhood trauma.
  • r/K isn’t really a choice, it’s mostly genetics. Posing as the other type won’t work.
  • 65% genetically heritable. Your kids will be just as slutty as you are, whoever you marry.
  • Hot women can hold out for marriage. Not – cannot.
  • Women are more than morally offended when you treat them as promiscuous (when they’re not) because you’re also calling them ugly.
  • If you want a spouse who can pair bond neurologically and raise your children as a good role model, don’t marry a former slut.
  • Better spouses are genetically fitter spouses (average women, tall men).

Monoculture Bible quotes

God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?

Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.

I’m not going through and finding them all.

https://www.biblehub.com/bsb/isaiah/65.htm
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”

THEIR descendants.

Their OWN descendants.

Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation

“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:

I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
https://www.biblehub.com/leviticus/26-16.htm

The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.

“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
https://www.biblehub.com/deuteronomy/28-22.htm

The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.

If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.

Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/78.htm
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above

and opened the doors of the heavens.

24He rained down manna for them to eat;

He gave them grain from heaven.

25Man ate the bread of angels;

He sent them food in abundance.

26He stirred the east wind from the heavens

and drove the south wind by His might.

27He rained meat on them like dust,

and winged birds like the sand of the sea.

28He felled them in the midst of their camp,

all around their dwellings.

29So they ate and were well filled,

for He gave them what they craved.

30Yet before they had filled their desire,

with the food still in their mouths,

31God’s anger flared against them,

and He put to death their strongest

and subdued the young men of Israel.”

 

Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?

He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).

 

“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;

despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.

33So He ended their days in futility,

and their years in sudden terror.

34When He slew them, they would seek Him;

they repented and searched for God.

35And they remembered that God was their Rock,

that God Most High was their Redeemer.

36But they deceived Him with their mouths,

and lied to Him with their tongues.

37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,

and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”

 

The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.

You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.

 

“38Yet He was compassionate;

He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.

He often restrained His anger

and did not unleash His full wrath.

39He remembered that they were but flesh,

a passing breeze that does not return.

40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness

and grieved Him in the desert!

41Again and again they tested God

and provoked the Holy One of Israel.

42They did not remember His power —

the day He redeemed them from the adversary,

43when He performed His signs in Egypt

and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”

 

Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.

This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.

 

“44He turned their rivers to blood,

and from their streams they could not drink.”

The Thames?

“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,

and frogs that devastated them.”

That one is funny.

“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,

the fruit of their labor to the locust.

47He killed their vines with hailstones

and their sycamore-figs with sleet.

48He abandoned their cattle to the hail

and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”

 

Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?

 

“49He unleashed His fury against them,

wrath, indignation, and calamity—

a band of destroying angels.”

 

only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal

 

“50He cleared a path for His anger;

He did not spare them from death

but delivered their lives to the plague.

51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,

the virility in the tents of Ham.”

 

The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?

 

“52He led out His people like sheep

and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.

53He led them safely, so they did not fear,

but the sea engulfed their enemies.

54He brought them to His holy land,

to the hill country His right hand had acquired.

55He drove out nations before them

and apportioned their inheritance;”

 

Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.

 

“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.

56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,

for they did not keep His decrees.

57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,

twisted like a faulty bow.”

 

Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!

 

“58They enraged Him with their high places

and provoked His jealousy with their idols.

59On hearing it, God was furious

and rejected Israel completely.

60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,

the tent He had pitched among men.

61He delivered His strength to captivity,

and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.

62He surrendered His people to the sword

because He was enraged by His heritage.”

 

Stop f-ing it up.

 

“63Fire consumed His young men,

and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”

I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.

 

“64His priests fell by the sword,

but His widows could not lament.”

 

Which book are they reading?

Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.

https://www.biblehub.com/1_kings/8-37.htm

 

https://www.biblehub.com/job/31-8.htm

“6let God weigh me with honest scales,

and He will know my integrity.

7If my steps have turned from the path,

if my heart has followed my eyes,

or impurity has stuck to my hands,

8then may another eat what I have sown,

and may my crops be uprooted.

9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,

or I have lurked at his door,

10then may my own wife grind grain for another,

and may other men sleep with her.”

 

Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!

The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.

Later:
“24If I have put my trust in gold

or called pure gold my security,

25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth

because my hand had gained so much,

26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance

or the moon moving in splendor,

27so that my heart was secretly enticed

and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,

28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,

for I would have denied God on high.

29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,

or exulted when evil befell him—

30I have not allowed my mouth to sin

by asking for his life with a curse—

31if the men of my house have not said,

‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—

32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,

for my door has been open to the traveler—”

note: not settler, the passing-through

“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam

by hiding my guilt in my heart,

34because I greatly feared the crowds,

and the contempt of the clans terrified me,

so that I kept silent

and would not go outside—”

crowded cities, huh?

“38if my land cries out against me

and its furrows weep together,

39if I have devoured its produce without payment

or broken the spirit of its tenants,

40then let briers grow instead of wheat

and stinkweed instead of barley.””

Briefly:

https://www.biblehub.com/isaiah/65-22.htm
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”

https://biblehub.com/isaiah/5-8.htm
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”

he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
https://biblehub.com/job/15-28.htm

“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/22-13.htm

 

It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”

“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing

except your own dishonest gain,

on shedding innocent blood,

on practicing extortion and oppression.””

Jer 22, btw

 

“21I warned you when you were secure.

You said, ‘I will not listen.’

This has been your way from youth,

that you have not obeyed My voice.

22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,

and your lovers will go into captivity.

Then you will be ashamed and humiliated

because of all your wickedness.

Why are he and his descendants hurled out

and cast into a land they do not know?

29O land, land, land,

hear the word of the LORD!

30This is what the LORD says:

“Enroll this man as childless,

a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.

None of his descendants will prosper

to sit on the throne of David

or to rule again in Judah.”

MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.

Remember, the people are the culture:

Psalm 127:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”

If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.

A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.

A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/they-dont-quote-this-line-2/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/07/21/context/

Quite a picture.

Is “homemaker” the new welfare queen?

PSA in case they’re trying this bullshit.

Rhetorical question, naturally.

Clarification:

Cook/chef is a job.
Cleaner is a job.
Working from home (for a company, yours or another) is a job.
Motherhood is a job. Fatherhood is a job. Nanny is a job.
Driver is a job.
Housekeeper is a job.

With me so far?

Home-maker …is not a job.

Sitting at home… is not a job.

Existing among four walls …. is not a job.

Stop.

Please, just stop.

We all do that. You are not special and have given nothing of value to the world, you have no insightful conservative thoughts by merely sitting in a house and occasionally tidying. We do that too! Full grown adults!

An “allowance” is a gift, not income. Legally.

There are also legal limits on how much you can get and they’re low.

You know who got an allowance? Playboy whores in the mansion. Were they ‘homemakers’ too?

And the way they normalise their husband’s financial abuse is pure cringe like sorry, he allows you to leave the house? Is this Yemen?

He allows you to drive? Is this Saudi Arabia?

You have curfew? Is this martial law?

He supports you…. doing what, exactly? What’s your job title? (Hint: On your taxes).

Creepy creepy infantilisation of a sexually active adult and we’re supposed to sit here and act like that’s normal.

No, that’s never been normal. Stop trying to make homemaker culture happen.

Video game addicts have more value to society than you. They assist GDP.

I bet they’re secretly camwhores the other 12 hours of the day they’re not cooking.

You replace your hubby’s need to order takeaway and? Walking the dog doesn’t take that long.

The past six months I’ve seen these hoes show up, all with the same routine:

*giggle* “I don’t have to get a part-time job! I’m so lucky!” *humblebrags for attention*

You mean, he won’t allow you? That’s illegal.

No one will be surprised when they eventually snap. Even dogs can’t be confined like that for long periods of time. They will go mental. Otherwise, rich idiot hubby loses the money at some point in the decade-long future and they either leave or she gets a job anyway like a self-sufficient adult.

THE HORROR.

And what if she’s widowed? Like come on, you do need a job or to be able to have a CV of some description, you stupid bitches. The state won’t treat you like the mental child you are.

This is all so disgusting. You know if the husband changed his line of work, they’d leave him too.

If he’s literally paying them to <exist>, of course they’re going to be speaking about husband in glowing terms… not because they like him! Not because they respect him! Not because they believe in marriage! Classic meal ticket!

Having a wet hole is not a job. If you can’t put it on a CV, it isn’t work.

This also goes for kept gay guys. A growing situation too.

They will need to earn a crust eventually.

After all those years (not-so-secretly) looking down on women who earn their own food.

Like a grown-up.

Or who’ll be expected to bail them out? Taxpayers.

Actual housewives don’t brag about living off their husband, they’re too busy contributing to the marriage. These bitches are unfairly yoked.

These people do not represent conservatives, we have correct time preference and plan things.

Who’s targeting who? Is it controlling psychopaths targeting entitled female narcs?

Marriage is NOT a status. It doesn’t make you a superior being. It’s a role.

Reminds me of this:

and this

Being the black section.

That is not traditional marriage, America. Women worked in ancient times, in Proverbs 31, they worked alongside the men up until factories in the 19th century, then they literally did the same work from home or in other factories. They didn’t just sit there 90% of the time.

You would be fired. 

Sitting at home with hundreds of hours of leisure time per month is not an occupation.

You’re a welfare wife. You are a trophy.

I don’t know a single married mother during the 50s who didn’t have part-time minimum paid work at some point. It is necessary. That was the 50s economy!

Bluebearding a woman with something more confining than prison (they can work and walk around outside without being questioned) is bound to end terribly at some point… and the SJWs will seize upon it to smear actual housewives and stay-at-home mothers and fathers.

I can see it coming. A mile off. I have warned you.

It’s a dysfunctional mini-commune model larping as right-wing.

They call it a job but get defensive when you ask if their income was on their tax returns…. like, yes Karen, that’s what job means.

It’s a legal term. Where’s your employment contract? Which tax forms do you file?

[I found this out by accident, inquiring out of genuine interest.]

You can’t just throw around those words or it’s my duty to report you as a domestic slave.

Is your home an LLC? Well, you called it a “business”, Karen. Words have meanings.

Workers also have to fully comply with national occupational laws and have job security.

Your husband or otherwise breadwinner can leave you at any time. That, in Russia, is called an “arrangement”.

Jobs are involved, but it is not a job.

This has been a PSA.

Fuck lazy people. Don’t call it a job. I can report you to the IRS.

Work minus worker’s laws = slavery. Don’t try me, Karens.

This is like a weird new cult thing springing up among conservathots and I want nothing to do with it.

It feels culty. Stepford Wife culty. Lifestyle ‘blogging’ is not a job.

They’re trying to hide their leftie laziness behind people with honest right-wing positions.

You are not a housekeeper because you open the door or an entrepreneur because you have social media to post the grandiose nothing happening and you stole a once-pure term to be a housebound thot.

Is this the new Pokemon form of gold digger?

Like the man doesn’t MAKE the home possible by funding it? Such shade.

It’s such a pretentious term over housewife. They’re 100% dependent on a man but act like feminists too.

Stay at home, sure but quit fucking gloating about it like you’re doing the world a favour.

Picture 1: my face. In the house.

Picture 2: my face. In the house.

Picture 3: my face. In the house.

Caption: women who use their sexuality are evil! I’m such a /nice girl, be “feminine” and useless to the world like me! teeheehee! 

You have literally accomplished nothing.

Cults of personality reee. Men don’t need to worship you for a magic ring, Galadriel.

You didn’t invent femininity and it doesn’t involve sitting around being a literal useless cunt.
There’s no such thing as an activist for anything, they’re all missionaries. It’s classic Crusaderism.

RUN.

It feels like narcissistic mothers in-training, spare the children!

The whole routine is fake, guys watching. All of it. Just listen closely for passive-aggression, weird statements and screencap the occasional lapse (every 2 mins) in the narc mask.

So much pings as out-of-place. I’ve been sitting on this waiting for these women to contribute.

[I am better looking than these women, by the way, it just pisses me off they’re claiming to represent ALL women the same way, suspiciously, that the SJWs claim to represent ALL women too. Fuck off we can represent ourselves, Saint Jolie 2. Bring the “community” together? Horse-shit. Conservatives don’t believe in multicultural utopia.]

White women just picking up the Asian waifu fake femininity bullshit. Complete with mannerisms.

You’ll note, for the court, that ‘being feminine’ entails doing all the things they wanted to do anyway and none of the things they don’t?

Cultural camwhores with pussywhipped rich idiot husbands. If it’s so fulfilling why are you fucking micro-blogging your every last excruciatingly dull thought? Why that urge?

I don’t post personal life on here because …. the urge never strikes. I don’t tell personal stories. I actually don’t get why they want to share any family business online. Why?

Relevant:

https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm

It also has various verses prohibiting prostitution and pride.

10 For even while we were with you, we gave you this command: “If anyone is unwilling to work, he shall not eat.” 11 Yet we hear that some of you are leading undisciplined lives and accomplishing nothing but being busybodies12 We command and urge such people by our Lord Jesus Christ to begin working quietly to earn their own living

I’m sure these saints with cunts know better than the Bible, right?

“14 Take note of anyone who does not obey the instructions we have given in this letter. Do not associate with him, so that he may be ashamed.”

Living off a man like a tick is so #trad, huh?

Same ones shaming other women for having a better figure? Missed the verse where that was evil, little Mrs Communal Narcissist.

They make all women look bad. Sainthood isn’t handed over as part of the marriage ceremony.

Imagine what they’ll be like in a decade or two. Wow.

There is no Sisterhood. Stop acting like you’re on my side. I see you.

Conservasnatch is still censorship Church missionary ‘feed the world’ bullshit. I see you.

This is just a sighting of the Old Crazy Church Lady before she got old, pretending her feminine wiles are better than sluts’ wiles.

They’re even playing Christian for clicks while reaching out to Muslim women. Go die in a fire, Karen.

Holy fire.

This doesn’t add up. None of it. Calling it out.

CHINOs don’t get to tell every other woman on the planet what makes them a woman.

Fuck off.

Welfare queens do the same thing. Sit at home. Me-me-me social media. Get an allowance.

Not a job.

If they claim it’s a job, report them to the IRS. I am serious. Especially if they’re getting shekels with the online homemaker routine, like that’s any less attention-whoring than a Kardashian with her tits out. Bitch, you ain’t better.

Jawline moving make-up

Since the fake eyelids revelation freaked enough of you out.

Yes. It is real. You cover it with foundation.

Notice how the mandible itself (the true jaw) cannot be compressed at the corner edges, except with surgery.

Why I don’t trust “contour”. It’s old theatre make-up, literally it is, to look like another person.

This is, according to her, “a small face”. As you can see, still square.


In a natural square jaw (see Jolie or Grace Kelly for white ones) the corner of the “square” is lower than in other women.

A higher-set corner, smooth (less bone) and curved jaw sweeping down to the chin is feminine.

 

I’m scientifically, indisputably correct on that point.

 e.g.  

THAT is a gracile jaw.

Finally, the angle of the face is important. She naturally tucks her chin to recess her face’s sides in shadow behind hair but she actually has a recessed chin already. That’s unhealthy, causes double chins but culturally encouraged.

It’s strange how this is suggested once you’ve watched that.

Square-jawed Hollywood women get Botox to reduce the muscular prominence of their jaw.
http://capeaesthetics.co.za/2016/04/12/botox-for-bruxism/

So it isn’t like Asians are the only ones.

And plenty of “White” Jewish girls are still pushing the definition of natural into absurdity.

Very natural, quack quack on, bitch.

A hallmark of that eye surgery is that to appear more doe-eyed, the best the surgeon can do is make the eyes look more distant from one another. This requires more surgery to open them out again, giving them that sexy ET look.

Ew.

Video: Excuses empaths make for narcissists

Urge to control hidden with lovebombing (being nice isn’t an obligation) and magically change the other person, killing the former person. Thanks, Disney’s Beauty and the Beast!

Validating bad behaviours as proof they’re needed.

Feeling superior for “catching” the predator they think they can turn into prey.

Resentment of common sense (if you don’t want them as they are, leave).

Passive aggression masquerading as gender roles (both sexes) e.g. 50s housewife incompetence or bravado complete with gaslighting put-downs around said incompetence.

http://things.justinthrelkeld.com/post/178624223456/maybe-50s-jello-food-actually-was-a-sublimated

Often they aren’t really empaths and covert narcissists pretend to be empaths.

Like autists and psychopaths (they confuse self-involvement with empathy).

Expecting a narc to love is like expecting a man with no hands to juggle.

A common female manifestation:

Intrusive people pushing into your life under the guise of “helping”.

Treating you like the problem (or a problem) and acting like your mother or shrink (power) when you made it clear you do not want this. If you were the problem, they’d want you to see a shrink or leave.

They don’t respect boundaries and try to force things as Being Nice. Those are the biggest bitches of all and to men, seem popular (and feminine, it’s fake feminine to seem less bossy) but women actually keep them at arm’s length with fake niceties to appease them. (It isn’t anything to do with appearance, contrary to what men can assume, as they’ll discover if they marry it).

It’s easy to spot Fake Nice women – does anyone take advantage of their “niceness”? If no, they’re actually a social predator. Real nice people hate the rep and people do take advantage.

It’s for your own good from such fake people is gaslighting, surely you know your own good better than someone you just met?

A common one I heard from men is “she won’t leave me alone, I feel like I’m being stalked!” yeah, because you are? If you tell someone repeatedly to back off and they don’t it’s harassment. I don’t cover female abuse enough but I feel uncomfortable knowing people may twist it or as if I’m speaking for experiences of men than just repeating.

Beige America?

You think I’m fucking with you, don’t you?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2015.1035145
Yes, a real study paper.

“This article examines the impacts of the race of the future theory on the U.S. population. By and large, the theory posits that the mixing of different races—due to the process of miscegenation, especially in marriage, cohabitation, or sexual relations—will blend all races, so much so that, in the future, the end result of this mixing will be a panracial formation (i.e., one race). In this analysis, the authors attempt to determine whether the mixing of colors currently happening in the United States will lead to one race and what the race of the future in the United States will “look” like.”

For once, I was not, in fact, fucking with you.

“One of the major conclusions is that, although the possibility of the existence of the race of the future has yet to be established, the degree of multiraciality in the U.S. population is rapidly growing (based on data and statistics from the U.S. Bureau of the Census).”

They’re planning this whether you like it or not.

Your tax monies fund this.

Behold your future, America.

Look long and hard. Such vigour!

Isn’t diversity your strength?

Aren’t you on the right side of history?

Don’t white people deserve to go extinct?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281431958_Race_of_the_Future_Mixing_of_Colors_in_the_United_States_Leading_to_One_Race

Simmer gently in a slowly boiling pan of fact.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/05/future-immigration-will-change-the-face-of-america-by-2065/
Remember, the most common nation to immigrate isn’t Mexico, it’s China!

Welcome to Asian-majority America. I’m sure you’ll be treated well.
They’re so nice to dogs.

The projected rise of Asians as the nation’s largest immigrant group has its own implications, among them potentially increased education levels. Among immigrants who arrived within the past five years, Asians already outnumber Hispanics, in part because of a sharp recent drop in immigration from Mexico.

This is from 2015.

This slowed Hispanic immigration also will have a longer-term impact: In 2065, Asians will outnumber Hispanics among all immigrants – 38% to 31%. (Today those shares are 26% and 47%.)

The increased share of Asian immigrants among all immigrants means that education levels of the foreign-born population could rise sharply, because Asian immigrants tend to be better educated. Among recent immigrants from Asia, for example, 57% have completed college, compared with 13% for recent Mexican immigrants and 28% for immigrants from other Central or South American nations.

Worship your new supposed high IQ rulers, don’t question it!

The rise of the Asian share of the immigrant population also could have implications for the political debate about immigration over the next 50 years. Americans today have mixed views about the impact of immigrants on society, but tend to have more favorable views of Asian (and European) immigrants than other groups, according to a recent Pew Research survey.

Other white guys are rolling over for some soypussy*, so you should too!

The survey also found that most Americans (56%) would prefer giving priority to immigrants who are highly educated (or highly skilled), compared with 37% who favor giving priority to those with family in the U.S.

Cucks. You can train your own people.

(and *soy sauce makes white men fat, sorry to tell you this)

https://www.ketodomain.com/keto-food-info/soy-sauce-safe-keto/

“Soy sauce also contains phytoestrogens. Phytoestrogens mimic estrogen in the body.”

http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/natural/phytamt2.htm
Phytoestrogen levels in various soy products study measurements.

Asian women with tits have just faked it by eating tons of (GMO) soy. That isn’t genetic, note the facial masculinity.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/neotony-isnt-an-asian-thing/

Transsexuals consume it for this purpose too.

https://feminizationsecrets.com/male-to-female-feminine-foods/

“Neotony” isn’t an Asian thing

If I don’t correct the pedophiles trying to feel normal, who will?

Humans are considered by some biologists to be a youthful looking species. We have weak (gracile) jaws compared to say, gorillas and large heads compared to say, chimps.
Stop trying to snowflake a biological possibility of prevalence.
It isn’t Asian or even characteristic of Asians (anime isn’t real!), it’s more prevalent in women than men (but common to humans) and can occur in Asians. However, most Asians have narrow, upturned (i.e. not round) and small eyes – thus cannot count under that heading. They are the least youthful on that feature!

You know, on average and before Daddy’s plastic pays for new plastic.
There are plenty of Asians who don’t have it (most by definition, attractive people are always a minority in their own population) and get the most surgery in the world to reset their masculine bone structure where possible in easy areas like the jawline and brow bone.

The technical un-PC term is “pedomorphic” so….

yeah…

Don’t go round telling people you find that hot.

Another error made on purpose by perverts?

Young isn’t the same as sexually immature. Men are sexually disgusted by signs of sexual immaturity so quit pushing that or show me some amazing, ironclad studies to back up your claim.

p.s. A fetish isn’t covered by sexual selection. Please stop getting evolution wrong, America! If you’d pass over the many white, black, whatever else women with larger eyes and smaller gracile (not under-developed/inbred/immature) chins then what you really have is Yellow Fever, a paraphilia (fetish). The Kibbe gamine type exists in all races and Asian culture expects women to fake it. So they do.

Youthful (but NOT immature!!!) features indicate health. That’s it. That’s all.
As in, an Asian looking really cute by plastic surgery with no waist, boyish hips and poor fertility doesn’t count under the biological model as fit. Because it isn’t real. Biology covers what is natural only. It also covers evolved historical conditions, new transportation and the race mixing that is possible isn’t covered because it’s novel. I’ve covered as much as possible that’s available to discuss online with the medical issues boyish women have with childbirth. If C-sections didn’t exist, a lot of Asian women would die, especially if the baby is half-white. Most women who go in for IVF are Asian (and have a higher failure rate than White women) and nobody knows why because nobody is allowed to study racial differences openly.

If they cared about these women, they’d study things to actually help them.

Fetishists miss the part about the eye shape and size because the common black eyes (again, contacts don’t count as genetic!) cue to their stupid brain that the woman is in love with them (pupil dilation) and not a threat.
Their cartoons look like white women, they get surgery/hair dye/makeup/skin glue/fake eyelashes to look like white women and their husbands cheat with Russian prostitutes. Actions speak louder than words.

What’s been called “psychological neotony” by some obvious pedophiles is emotional retardation and intellectual immaturity. That’s all retardation is, being stuck in an earlier stage of development. Humans have life stages, to not grow up is disturbed. They are just as bad as the vapid Valley girl.
If it’s vapid and stupid when white women do it, it’s the same when Asians do it. Stop white (yellow?) knighting. Fake femininity is obnoxious.
Neotony or in accurate anthropological terms, pedomorphology is allowed in society because we’re decadent, it is a sign of civilizational regression to encourage showy incompetence. It’s literally the female equivalent of the soyboy. They’re useless and act like children to get out of their citizen’s duties in life. And you’re falling for that?

It’s your life to ruin, I guess?

Black women have a tendency to act strong to get male resources, Asian women have a tendency to act weak to get male resources. White women can go either way with Eastern European acting weak and Western Europe acting strong(er).

But your hierarchy is fake science.

As a race, the “neotonous” features as characteristic belong to Europeans.
Show me a mathematical computer study that tops this.

Marquardt female ideal, sexually mature and youthful.

Proportionately large eyes, high, well-formed cheekbones, full but not huge lips and narrow mouth (youthful mouth indicator for femininity, not fullness which men have moreso) and a fine nasal bridge, soft brow bones and cherry chin, gracile thin jawline and thinner overall face shape closer to oval ideal, 2:1 ratio.

I drew this in case some bitch can’t do ratios.

Shapely philtrum (predicts uterine health), proportionate ears and nostrils (evolved to climate), healthy eye distance (neither too big or too small, beauty is healthy average because it shows a low mutation load)!

Fits closest to Europeans, matching up to corroborating dating site selection data and male preference attitude surveys who would preferentially date a European woman.

European fits it best based on youthful features, then Africans because they have large eyes and full lips and THEN Asians. The eye area is crucial for this. If you don’t have youthful eyes, you don’t have it.

One warning:

Looking like a baby also means looking like a boy, femininity is different. It is not childish, it’s womanly.

The classic beauty within her race does not look like a girl.

Femininity has certain features which coincide with youthful and healthy.

Women have longer, thinner faces including noses and paler skin than their racial male counterparts. This is constant throughout all races. Don’t look at models for an average, they’ve had work done.

Basic rundown for you to begin your own research.

I hate explaining the obvious. The white woman picture has filled lips, ignore that detail.

You might argue, where’s the Marquardt data for that?

Here’s the face-on beauty ideal for women from their global dataset.

Name that race.

Fully feminine and neotonous face with the contours shaded correctly.

Note the longer nose but more delicate bone structure (as opposed to yang angular).
Note the thinner face and reduced mouth width.

Basically everything above it.

Oval, check. Thin but not under-developed nose, check. Round curved brows, check. Narrow mouth with full lips (so incredibly proportionately feminine). Soft features including round normal eye shape, check. Heavily dimorphic, check. Long face compared to male average, check. Small but developed chin, check. High delicate cheekbones, check.

Example of those IRL.

This is so blitheringly obvious to me I struggle to put it into words.
I guess I’ve been trained to see this but did you never notice?

Really?

Pretty/cute/sexy are absolute shit compared to beauty.

Black women are higher on this trait of neotony than Asians and everyone talks about them like dirt when they don’t deserve it.

Africans have great eyelashes too, unlike the majority of Asian women.

The eye area is the hallmark of this trait. So African women can look great in 20s makeup.

I’m redpill which means I tell the truth, even when it isn’t about my own group.

Compare with the Asian standard model based on the dataset of averages.

Looks very masculine to me. Very angular, very strong, very yang.

No, neotony is the least Asian thing. I’m sure their surgeons will be pleased to hear you ever considered otherwise. One sign an Asian woman had surgery is that her chin now looks inbred and under-developed, like European royalty sometimes did.

Her larger Asian skull formed in the uterus and by chopping and sliding and trashing the bones to look more European, by proportion it now looks weird and doesn’t fit with the rest of the head’s bones.

There’s a definite look. Example in white people.

The chin looks weird. Not a good look.

Cute?

You can’t hide your real bone structure, even with surgery.

The skeleton is inside you.