Immigration is war

invasion but mmk

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/immigration-is-war-an-interview-with-eric-zemmour

“Zemmour is in London as part of his still undeclared campaign to be the next president of France — to curry favour with and raise money from the many French voters who live in the capital. But the British Establishment has given him a cold reception. Mayor Sadiq Khan said he wasn’t welcome. The Royal Institution cancelled his event. The government ordered Conservatives to call off meetings with him. That could be because Boris Johnson hopes to repair badly damaged relations with Emmanuel Macron, the man Zemmour wants to eject from the Élysée Palace. Or it could just be that Mr Z is considered so right wing as to be toxic.”

Anti-immigration wankers being immigrants themselves.

Maybe THAT is your problem?

Like when Pettibone moved to Germany to complain about immigrants… like herself.

The Bible says we must not be a hypocrite.

Team Zemmour argue that the Tories have missed a trick. A President Zemmour would be far less antagonistic to Brexit Britain than President Macron. Zemmour is officially against ‘Frexit’, yet he is complimentary, even a touch romantic about Britain’s decision to leave the European Union. ‘The conservative elites, at least some of them, are proud to have respected the choice of the British people, unlike the French political elites,’ he says, speaking in French because his English is limited. He compares Brexit with France’s referendum in 2005, when the French said ‘non’ to the European Constitution, only to be ignored. ‘That was disgraceful. I find the behaviour of the British elites much more noble.’

So you still have kings? And we still haven’t left the EU. They won’t let us. The vaxport shit is an excuse for an EU-wide ID.

When the vaxwankers say just following orders, still hang them, but a better question to ask first is WHOSE ORDERS?

Now he’s saying invasion is only ok if you have a “fisherboat” that happens to contain a nice little machine gun (why we didn’t shoot them I do not know, they literally had a gun aimed at our countrymen in our waters and were mocking them). I can’t find the exact story but it was DM.

He’s quick to add that he finds it ‘cruel’ of Britain to have withheld licences from French fisherman over waters they’ve trawled for centuries. ‘I don’t think this “fair”, as you like to say in England,’ he says, amusing himself with the quaint Anglo–Saxonness of the notion. ‘I find it “unfair”.’ He also blames Macron for ‘negotiating very badly’ and throws in a swipe at Michel Barnier, the chief Brexit negotiator and another candidate in the 2022 French presidential election: ‘He showed his limitations there. It’s incredible that he left the issue hanging in the air and did not deal with it.’

This man is not even French. Fake Ks. Told ya.

What’s fair is shooting an invading boat containing a gun threatening our citizens in their own national waters. Those are not your waters. You over-fished your waters selling to the EU instead of your own people and are now screwing ours.

This is why I don’t trust the fake Right.
So many immigrants living here have zero genetic claim, like you’ll see a German with an Asian.

Didn’t we fight WW2 to STOP invasion by those two? This is why race mixing was illegal too, the Bible but also national security. Look at all the Chinese honeypot waifus, like Hunt’s Ting Tong. It’s the fakest sounding meeting story I ever heard, we all know they probably met in a massage parlour and the guy was loudly bitching that his kid was ugly. Well, yeah. He looks like his mother, kids are gonna pick on the fug kid. It isn’t even a race thing.

Marrying someone without seeing photos of them prior to cosmetic surgery should be illegal. But they chose to self-cuck so sucks to be you.

Unless you deport the ones already here (AND the anchor babies used by spies) then don’t bother.

Fishing is one problem; cross-Channel illegal immigration quite another. What would President Zemmour do to stop the growing number of migrant boats from France arriving on Britain’s shores? ‘I’ll tell you what: if I were president, they would not arrive in Calais.’ He says the Le Touquet agreement, through which Britain pays to support French border checkpoints, is ‘disrespectful’ to France. ‘We’re not a third-world country. I don’t understand why French governments accepted this. On the other hand, these people… should not enter France. We should do every-thing possible to dissuade them.

I would expel these people and I would suppress all social aid so that they would not be tempted to come any more…

I saw your Home Secretary say — and she is absolutely right — that France should better control its border.’He’s officially against ‘Frexit’, yet he is a touch romantic about Britain’s decision to leave the European Union

He’s clearly read me.

Actually, pull a California Exit Tax and force them to pay it all back – plus interest. All the schooling, healthcare, housing etc. That’s the only way. Banning inter-continental or inter-religious marriages would also work. Like, you love the foreign so much? Move over THERE, then. They have no right to bring back a Thai proz and infect the home country. Flee sexual immorality.

Just get the Army involved to defend the country from any and all invasion, battleships style. At least the Germans weren’t cowardly enough to take their toddlers to D-Day.

Then there’s camps for the hotel people. The 5 star hotel people. I’ve never stayed in one, why are my taxes paying for them? Literal criminals. Hold them in camps. We have mega prisons, we can do it.

We’re now on to the issue that drives Zemmour’s political mission and fuels his incendiary campaign. ‘Immigration is war,’ he says, hitting his rhetorical stride. ‘They want to invade our European countries. That’s all. It’s nothing else. It’s war.’

Invasions do not require weapons. How’s that for a meme?

The ultimate aim of invasions is NOT war – it is taking money from the nation’s people (welfare and taking jobs, check) and breeding with the natives (willingly or rape, check).

Immigration is a rebrand of invasion, by definition.

Macron, he goes on, is gripped by ‘an individualistic ideology. He thinks every individual is basically the same and can live everywhere. Of course, he will enforce rules here and there, but fundamentally…the existence of peoples to him seems outdated.’

You can see why Darwin was a Christian, describing God’s creation.
God made races, kept them apart. Evolution is accounting for that genetic variance, well or poorly. Multi-Regional Hypothesis points to God, that’s why SJWs hate it and keep tacking on asterisks to the failed Out of Africa model. I’ve written about this here before. Race is a Darwinian classification in biology, even Vox believes in it while denying evolution wholesale like an SJW. The mixed are mongrels, in Origin of the Species. Race is an exclusive term, they don’t have one, they are raceless. This explains modern mental health findings even in rich half-Asians. Read the sodding book already. If it were secular, the SJWs would teach it in schools.

There was a Frenchman who had a book about family structure and how it evolved differently by races. It’s out of print, bring it back? You need to. It needs to be taught in schools. Culture is genetic. This proves it.

The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems

HBD ignores this because many of them advocate adulterating their blood out of reprobate lust.

This book PROVES they will NEVER assimilate (the ghetto in America still exists, centuries later).

“Does he blame the economic liberalism of Thatcher and Reagan for the excessive individualism to which Macron subscribes? ‘I wouldn’t say that,’ he replies. ‘It’s more a deviation from Christian humanism. As Chesterton said: “It’s Christian virtues gone mad.”’

Tolerance has never been a virtue, it’s always been a Christian weakness. Flee immorality.
Tolerance is a Satanic virtue. Live and let live, love is love (even when it’s child abuse). Hate the sin, not the sinner blame-shifting, absolving them of accountability.

I don’t trust this guy, until he cites that book. Immigration is founded on a lie: assimilation.

Zemmour prefers the English word ‘globalisation’ to the French ‘mondialisation’ to describe this process. ‘It’s an alliance of left and right,’ he says. ‘Above all it is cowardice.’ By that he means that European leaders have been weak in refusing to tackle the social and political ills concomitant with globalisation. ‘For 40 years they’ve been afraid to confront the politically correct, afraid of riots in suburbs, afraid of being seen in a bad light by the media, afraid of not obeying the judges.’

Longer, the lynching of the pedo Jew in America and Jack the Ripper outing himself as a Jew and the police covered it up.

Woke is anti-white genocide rhetoric, mentacide/menticide intended to make them cow long enough to import a strong invading force to take over. It’s a temporary tactic, not the whole strategy.

Thought Prison, read it.

“This wokeness, he argues, is a kind of Trojan horse for the Islamification of formerly Christian nations. ‘It is by destroying our cultures, our history, that they make a clean sweep of all that and allow a foreign culture, history and civilisation to come and replace it.’”

Replacement is genocide, call it. UN definition of genocide.

c) is also financial like stopping natives from reproducing because they’re funding out-group families. d) includes housing limits and so on.

I hear the Muslim taking over shit, from Muslims in the manosphere. Their IQ is too low, it’ll never happen. Think about it.

And how will they feed themselves?
Cold countries have stronger selection pressures than hot ones. When all the white people are gone, they’ll starve. They are temporary shock troops to eliminate Whitey. Useful inbred idiots. The rising popularity of Islam across Asia (hey expats, don’t lose your head) PROVES that Asians are not smart. I have seen zero retardation studies on half-Asians from the manosphere yet they claim these kids are fine. Youtube supports manosphere content, that should be a tell. Look at the national IQs, the ones that don’t fake transcripts and speak broken English at MIT. Genetics is destiny, the kids are NOT ok.

It isn’t a war horse, it’s a horse of peace.

I believe this fellow has been reading me. No particular reason.

Meme is from 2018.

Such talk — echoing as it does ‘the great replacement theory’ of Renaud Camus — causes consternation in progressive circles. Somebody, probably David Aaronovitch, will no doubt accuse The Spectator of giving a platform to nativism or white supremacism merely by speaking to him. Yet Zemmour is utterly unabashed about his views and he’s currently second or third in the presidential election polls.

Nativism is the birthright of the population, yes. Like capitalism is the birthright of the producer. Nativism is inheritance of labour from one’s own blood, exclusively. Anything less is theft and invasion. There is no AA between races.

Thou shalt not steal.
Arguing genocide is ok is actually illegal.

They are complicit and inciting the genocide of the native races.

ACCORDING TO THE UN DEFINITION WRITTEN BECAUSE OF THE NAZIS.

Nationalism against the rules written because of the Nazis is not the same, literally at all.

Do you think English people would’ve been spared in Nazi Germany either? Heil no! They weren’t racially conscious at all. I’d be as dead as the average Yid. Do you think we dunno this?

Might his preoccupations with national characteristics, the greatness of French literature and the collapse of western civilisation have something to do with the fact that he is himself an immigrant child? His parents were Berber Jews from Algeria. His grandfather spoke better Arabic than French. His father drove an ambulance.

This is why you need laws against mixing.

No further comment needed.

‘What my family has done in terms of assimilating French culture should be an example,’ he says, proudly. ‘I am a product of French colonialisation. I am not one of these people who condemn the French coloniser. I say thank you.

While he wishes to rule you and eliminate his own competition.
His final action in office should be to self-deport.

Assimilation is a myth.

He IS the coloniser by definition. What a gaslight.

What the so-called Alt Right refuses to acknowledge is that the Asians invaded first. Hey, they gave us Black Death. We had Chinatown before the Jewish influx and in the Edwardian Era they gave San Fran plague. Literal plague again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_plague_of_1900–1904

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Coast_race_riots_of_1907

The Pacific Coast race riots of 1907 were a series of riots against both Americans and Canadians of Asian descent that took place within the United States and Canada. The riots, which resulted in violence and destruction of property, were the result of anti-Asian tension caused by white opposition to the increasing Asian population during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Most notable riots that took place were in San Francisco, CaliforniaBellingham, Washington; and VancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada. Each city and anti-Asian activist group claimed its own unique reasoning for their specific riots, which were encouraged by the Asiatic Exclusion League.

Even Vox hasn’t mentioned this. History was more based than all of you. If the race traitors went back to those times and claimed to be traditional, they’d be lynched. Remember, mixing was illegal, treason still is. The crimes are related and Biblical. Honour thy family by not mongrelizing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiatic_Exclusion_League

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckland_riot

The Buckland riot was an anti-Chinese race riot that occurred on 4 July 1857, in the goldfields of the Buckland ValleyVictoria, Australia, near present-day Porepunkah. At the time approximately 2000 Chinese and 700 European migrants were living in the Buckland area.[1]

The Chinese are the Jews of Asia, everyone hates them but it’s apparently never their fault.

Yet they keep colonising places (currently Africa) and invite the Jews to follow shortly after. Business buddies. In cahoots. Every time. Undeniable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambing_Flat_riots

The Lambing Flat Riots (1860-1861) were a series of violent anti-Chinese demonstrations that took place in the Burrangong region, in New South WalesAustralia. They occurred on the goldfields at Spring Creek, Stoney Creek, Back Creek, Wombat, Blackguard Gully, Tipperary Gully, and Lambing Flat.

Do you think history will smile on the current cucks?

You know the Chinks are bad if they cause a team-up effort!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_massacre_of_1871

19 Chinese immigrants were killed, 15 of whom were later hanged by the mob in the course of the riot, but most of whom had already been shot to death before being hanged.[4] At least one was mutilated, when a member of the mob cut off a finger to obtain the victim’s diamond ring.[4] Those killed represented over 10% of the small Chinese population of Los Angeles at the time, which numbered 172 prior to the massacre. Ten men of the mob were prosecuted and eight were convicted of manslaughter in these deaths. The convictions were overturned on appeal due to technicalities.

This is why the Asians America is importing are turning SJW, they made it. You think Black riots are bad? Wait until you see the Asian ones. Mark my words. Diversity + Proximity has zero exceptions.
Less than 200 in the whole place, was still enough to make people wanna kill them. Begs the Question, what are they doing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_riot_of_1877

DIVERSITY HIRING POLICIES ARE VICTORIAN!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Springs_massacre

The Rock Springs massacre, also known as the Rock Springs Riot, occurred on September 2, 1885, in the present-day United States city of Rock Springs in Sweetwater CountyWyoming. The riot, and resulting massacre of immigrant Chinese miners by white immigrant miners, was the result of racial prejudice toward the Chinese miners, who were perceived to be taking jobs from the white miners.

The Union Pacific Coal Department found it economically beneficial to give preference in hiring to Chinese miners, who were willing to work for lower wages than their white counterparts, angering the white miners. When the rioting ended, at least 28 Chinese miners were dead and 15 were injured. Rioters burned 78 Chinese homes, resulting in approximately US$150,000 in property damage[1][2][3] (equal to $4.32 million in 2020 terms).[4]

I’m more Trad American than all the PC Americans hating on me for pointing out these people are bad for you, historically, biologically and eternally. It’s a fact. Immigration is treason, it betrays the native worker. Ironically, Marxists should oppose it. Labour used to.

You cannot absorb a billion people, that’s genocide, dipshits.

There were Victorian race riots all the time, like in East London. We aren’t taught them at school. Immigration has never worked, even at less than 1% levels in the most economically stable time periods of our history, high family formation, religion and birth rates.

The problem definitely isn’t us and the correlation to lower living standards as their numbers rise prove the hypothesis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_riot_of_1885

This organized action became known as the “Tacoma method”, and despite national and international outcry, it was used as an example of how to forcibly remove Chinese residents from cities and towns throughout the American West.[4] The anti-Chinese sentiment in Tacoma and Washington Territory more broadly made it so that those involved did not face repercussions for their actions.[5]

Who owns America? They weren’t deported from the country. Why?

It’s like teacher’s unions shipping around pedos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Squak_Valley_Chinese_laborers,_1885

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Chinese_sentiment_in_the_United_States

Just read it.

Race riots in England date back to 1221. It will never, ever work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots_in_London

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_I#Coronation_and_anti-Jewish_violence

When a rumour spread that Richard had ordered all Jews to be killed, the people of London attacked the Jewish population.[59] Many Jewish homes were destroyed by arsonists, and several Jews were forcibly converted.[59] Some sought sanctuary in the Tower of London, and others managed to escape. Among those killed was Jacob of Orléans, a respected Jewish scholar.[60] Roger of Howden, in his Gesta Regis Ricardi, claimed that the jealous and bigoted citizens started the rioting, and that Richard punished the perpetrators, allowing a forcibly converted Jew to return to his native religion. Baldwin of FordeArchbishop of Canterbury, reacted by remarking, “If the King is not God’s man, he had better be the devil‘s”.[61]

The will has always been there.

And the Kings hate us. That king was an immigrant himself. Prince William is immigrant blood, including a little Indian. And you wonder why they’re pro-immigration?

Offended that he was not being obeyed and realising that the assaults could destabilise his realm on the eve of his departure on crusade, Richard ordered the execution of those responsible for the most egregious murders and persecutions, including rioters who had accidentally burned down Christian homes.[62] He distributed a royal writ demanding that the Jews be left alone. The edict was only loosely enforced, however, and the following March further violence occurred, including a massacre at York.[63]

Who ruled us? The king was scared of the debtors. A supposedly Christian king killed some of the Christians for completing his orders, then pretended to go off and fight for Christianity. They’re not the same religion and they were following his orders, or so they thought. So was the Jew right and he favoured a foreign religion over his own Christian subjects? Or were they lying about that too? The rhetoric is nearly a millennium old. Are the words like bigot that old? I see no quote.

But the Bible calls for the bigotry of being the only religion. It is a commandment.
Divine right of Kings is Christian, therefore anti-Jew, Muslim, Hindu and anything else!
You convert them or kill them if you’re the agent of the Christian God’s will on Earth. It’s your job.

https://adam4d.com/john-1-3/

https://biblehub.com/john/1-3.htm

1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through Him all things were made, and without Him nothing was made that has been made. 4In Him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcomea it.

Neoreaction was too dumb to pick this up.

A King denying this part of the Bible is no King because he is no Christian.

Nobody goes to the Father except through Jesus, if a King deserves to be our Christian servant of God, he acts on this.

THEREFORE, IMMIGRATION IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN. You cannot be legitimate subjects of a Christian monarchy unless you are a Christian. Race aside, religion alone proves it. They are heathens, and the Bible says to banish them from your KINGDOM, if not kill them. Banish = deport.

Deut 28:63

Just as the LORD delighted to prosper and increase you, so now the LORD will delight to destroy, exterminate, and banish you from the land that you are about to enter to possess.”

Jer 8:3

However, I will leave some of these wicked people alive and banish them to other places. But wherever these people who survive may go, they will wish they had died rather than lived,” says the Lord who rules over all.

God supports deportation.

Ezek 4:13

The Lord said, “This is how the Israelites will eat their bread—ceremonially unclean—among the nations where I will banish them.”

EZEKIEL IS A JEWISH HOLY BOOK. THEY KNOW DEPORTATION IS HOLY.
(unless they’re faking being Jewish and Synagogue of Satan)

God has no evil in Him, all things He does are right, just, good and HOLY.

Therefore, deportation from a Christian Kingdom is HOLY.

https://biblehub.com/john/14-6.htm

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Non-Christians are all going to Hell. All of them. It’s right there. Unless the cucks know Christianity better than Christ! Cease adding to the Word.

Turns out?

You can’t spell patriotism without riot, kids.
….They’re gonna rip that off, aren’t they?

What a meme.

ONE FOR THE MEME DREAM TEAM

There was also a riot for men’s suffrage so if the manosphere could shut up like women were the first, or they’d be given any ‘rights’ in their wet dream version of multicultural Brotherhood history, that’d be great, thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_League

Sincerely, people who actually read.

p.s. If women couldn’t vote, the Left would eternally win, so you’d have to man up and defend the country and could no longer blame us. We still win. You couldn’t tax us either, threaten me with a good time.

So this fake French guy is pretending it was a problem in our lifetime. Er, literally how?

He doesn’t mention that Western culture is Christian culture, so I’m saying controlled ops.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/34-21.htm

The mixers and colonisers will never recover from what they’ve wrought.

Evil will slay the wicked; the foes of the righteous will be condemned.

Reminders of treason for false believers

Treason alongside other unclean-ness can be financial as well as sexual and cultural (xenophilia).

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Seduction

“My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent.” Prov 1:10

To deliver you from the strange woman, – Prov 2 (synonym: foreign)

But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. – 1 Cor 7:2-3

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, – 1 Timothy 4:1 anti-natalism is the Satanic principle of their religion.

They are cowards who fear an actual Biblical society for men:
“”If a man seduces a virgin who is not engaged, and lies with her, he must pay a dowry for her to be his wife. “If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the dowry for virgins.” – Exodus, Yes you need to pay the woman, you took something from her. Sex is physical, including rape. It is a theft. To act like sex is nothing (fun is an innocent thing for children, not a synonym for vice) or a mere form of exercise is Satanic. Man is not a rutting beast. Muh dick logic doesn’t fly.

“If there is a girl who is a virgin engaged to a man, and another man finds her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city and you shall stone them to death; the girl, because she did not cry out in the city, and the man, because he has violated his neighbor’s wife. Thus you shall purge the evil from among you. “But if in the field the man finds the girl who is engaged, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lies with her shall die” – Deut 22 #MeToo is ironically Biblical. We should hold sexual terrorists accountable.
PUAs strangely silent on this one. God forbid we hold men accountable for what they do with their body. There are no second chances to rape in a Christian patriarchy. As it should be.

Seduction is made plain as evil: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/13
and still on America’s legal books from a better time.

“11 But as soon as she brought them near him to eat, he overpowered her and told her, “Come here and have sex with me, my sister!”” When refused:

“14 But he refused to listen to her, and because he was stronger than she was, he raped her.”

But sure, blame women. And this causes the weakness in low IQ men called misogyny:

“15 After this, Amnon hated Tamar with such intensity that the hatred he hated her with was greater than the love he had loved her with. “Get out of here!” he said.”

Then we get the gaslighting instead of a trial.

“20 Later, her brother Absalom asked her, “Has Amnon, that brother of yours, raped you? Then keep quiet about your half-brother for now, my sister. Stop taking this so personally.” From that time on, Tamar lived in continuous desolation within her brother Absalom’s house.”

28 Then Absalom instructed his young men, “Please keep watching Amnon until he’s drunk. Then I’ll tell you, “Attack Amnon!’ As soon as I do, kill him and don’t be afraid! You have your orders, so be strong and brave!”

Yet they complain women aren’t held responsible… projection. Fish rot from the head, societies are ruined by weak men.

29 So Absalom’s young men did to Amnon just as Absalom had commanded. Then all the rest of the king’s sons got up, and each fled on his mule.

Men have been dodging holding one another responsible for rape for eons. If you permit rapists to attack your women, God will kill you all off and you’ll deserve it. So you see, the West mostly deserves to die. According to this lesson in the Bible, at least. You should kill them and let God sort them out.

38 After fleeing to Geshur, Absalom remained there for three years.

(David went soft during this time).

What do you expect from an adulterer? This is why the rule of men has failed, none of them punished one another. The Bro code is multicultural hypoagency, overtly anti-God.

16 So the king left, taking his entire household with him except for ten mistresses, who were to keep the palace in order. – 2 Sam 15

21 Ahithophel responded, “Go inside and have sex with your father’s mistresses, whom he left to keep the palace in order. Then everyone in Israel will hear how your father has come to hate you and everyone who has joined you will be emboldened to act.” – 2 Sam 16 that’s called rape actually

Men writing one another blank cheques to be whores is nothing new. That is why women loathe modern men, they earned it. Sexual disgust is based on actions, not chromosomes. What such men merit respect? None. Where is their conscience?

Fornication/rape of ten women because rape of one is also a sin? As Carlin said, fucking for virginity? Men are illogical. This is why humans mostly deserve Hell. The double standards. Nobody is exempt. That’s why it’s a standard.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/18

or King David could’ve practised the Word of God and just killed the rapist like a real man. You shouldn’t have raised a rapist. You deserve to grieve the rapist you made. This could have all been avoided if your sons weren’t whores.

18:14 “There’s no reason to wait for you!” Joab retorted. Then he took three spears in his hand and stabbed Absalom in the heart while he was still alive, dangling from the branches of the oak tree.

The wages of sin.

Absalom should’ve done his duty and avenged Tamar instead of banishing her and telling her to get over it. But muh bro code got them all killed.

2 Sam 19:4 Meanwhile, the king veiled his face and kept on crying loudly, “My son Absalom! Absalom my son, my son!”

What about Tamar???

You raised two rapists while whoring around yourself. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Solomon, who consorted with demons, also bedded them in possession of foreign women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/1-Kings/11/1

“Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women,”

The reason the Bible warns of the danger of seductive women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/Proverbs/7/5

“From the foreigner who flatters with her words.”

God made you what you are, do not trespass those bounds.

https://www.learnreligions.com/woman-at-the-well-700205

“During his encounter with the woman at the well, Jesus broke three Jewish customs. First, he spoke to her despite the fact that she was a woman. Second, she was a Samaritan woman, and the Jews traditionally despised Samaritans. For centuries Jews and Samaritans had rejected each other. And, third, he asked her to get him a drink of water, although using her cup or jar would have made him ceremonially unclean.

…To fully grasp the story of the woman at the well, it’s important to understand who the Samaritans were–a mixed-race people, who had intermarried with the Assyrians centuries before. They were hated by the Jews because of this cultural mixing and because they had their own version of the Bible and their own temple on Mount Gerizim.”

Sixth Commandment is a command to keep God’s designed bloodlines clean. This is also a Jewish principle and explains their success neatly versus mixed, mongrelized populations. Inbreeding < Outbreeding.

https://bible.org/seriespage/3-can-we-believe-immortality

When we approach the Bible on the subject of immortality, it is well to have in mind a few important facts that are basic and necessary to a proper understanding of the subject. Nowhere in the Bible is the expression to be found, “the immortality of the soul.” Nor is there written anything about “the immortal soul.” We are not suggesting for a moment that Scripture teaches anything about the sleep or annihilation of the soul at death. The thought of the soul’s endless being is true enough, but it is not Scriptural language to refer to “the immortality of the soul.” The Word of God assumes the eternal existence of every soul regardless of its destiny. Every man’s soul is immortal and can never be annihilated. Jesus said: “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul; but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell” (Matthew 10:28).

Now those who teach “soul-sleep” would have us believe that their doctrine is Biblical, when actually they have falsified the facts by their misinterpretation of Scripture. Man can kill the body, but that is the worst he can do. God alone can take hold of both body and soul and condemn them.

It is true we read: “The soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Ezekiel 18:4),

but neither here nor elsewhere in Scripture does a reference to the soul dying mean a state of non-existence, or even one of unconsciousness. The Bible teaches that there are three kinds of death and it distinguishes clearly between each. First, there is physical death, or the separation of the soul from the body. This is the death of the body to which reference was made in Hebrews 9:27, “It is appointed unto men once to die.” Second, the Bible teaches that there is a spiritual death. This is the separator of the soul from God, the condition of all unbelievers of whom Paul says they are “dead in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1), and “alienated* from the life of God” (Ephesians 4:18). Third, there is eternal death or banishment from God. All who suffer eternal death are conscious, but “shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord” (2 Thessalonians 1:9), these “have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death” (Revelation 21:8).

*the Other, the out-group

nb. Adam chose to eat of the tree, despite a direct warning from God. Nobody mentions this.

“In ADAM all die” – 1 Cor 15:22 so the PUA types blaming Eve/women are literally giving you false words, Adding to the Word.
You follow false prophets, anti-natal monsters.
You follow dead men in how to live your barren life. “A man who finds a wife finds a good thing”, “more precious than rubies” and “love her because she is a woman”.

They believe the lies of the mixed population (including certain bloggers), who project their unclean status onto the West and its men and women. Then be gone from us and go back from whence you came. We never wanted you here.

“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22).

The evangelical arrogance of Americans is to think proclaiming yourself a Christian makes you so. A corpse identifying as dead is not made living. You will only know if you’re going to Hell when you die. Vanity does nothing. Their belief is easy to question, since they preach against the Bible per se. The door of death will be closed to them. The Afterlife does not exist for all or even most people (the way is narrow). They deny this. They deny God.
Preaching one thing with your words (HYPOCRITE) and another with your actions (endorsing anti-natal, Molechian practice) is not Christian. 1 Peter 4:15 “busybody in other people’s matters” – influencer.
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Minding-Your-Own-Business
There is no rest for the wicked, they must constantly corrupt others and finally destroy themselves.

FI

Humans don’t say ‘you broke my brain’ we say ‘you broke my heart’. The heart stores the soul and its memories. The heart and brain both cannot regenerate in humans. Once damaged, medical science gives you a short timer. So this era is interesting in the biggest COD being heart disease. A reprobate mind/heart?