Jordan the Janus

https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/jordan-peterson-walks-back-his-kavanaugh-tweet/

“This guy is playing the game to try and become a pied piper on the right, while pushing us left to get media mentions and Cabal support:”

10/10

Greetings, fellow nationalists. Don’t focus on the world, avoid it.

I tried counting once how many people he ripped off in his talks and lost count.

I knew he was fake when he refused to debate Millennial Woes, who was prepared to pay his fee. Avoided like a scared little coward. Woes is a sweetheart but logical, difficult to trick. Who’s scared of an ex-art major? Jordan Peterson.

He mostly rips off basic bitch self improvement guru shit too. Men are prime targets because they don’t habitually read that shit like women and think it’s original. The Secret was based off a 20s leaflet.

“Now he tries to mitigate the damage. But he still got it out there like he meant it at a critical moment. And he defended the idea as plausible afterward. And now he is setting himself up as a thought-experimenter, who can never be held responsible for any future tweet that supports evil at critical moments, because it was just part of his process. I’d love to see a real time graph of his books sales, and see if there was a sudden spike of bulk sales right after that tweet.

Like Roosh’s rape fantasy, where, despite world press, nobody brought up pedophilia.

Funny that.

If you take him at his word, then every tweet he gives should be ignored.

Clown

Now everything he says is not his opinion, or even correct. Every tweet is basically just him talking out of his ass randomly and spouting whatever pops into his head at that moment.

College professor.

If you want that, there is no shortage of people you could follow on twitter who will provide it, and many will be funnier and more entertaining than Peterson…..”

He’s the standard Boomer cuck. They’ll mock SJWs on meds and liberal arts majors but not him.
Clean your room? What’s next, do the dishes? Are American men Cinderella?

Look up Charlton, Scruton, Haidt. Men without moving goalposts.

Final jab

“Even his premise – Kavanaugh was horribly slandered, but the people who oppose him, and slandered him, should have their wishes considered – is totally ridiculous. This is a great thinker?”

It’s ironic considering how many of his followers are shit-scared of rape accusations.

“False” accusations, Kavanaugh’s arse. And if they’re so scared, sleep with sober people? Don’t sleep with people who hate you? Be less of a whore? It’s only really a false accusation if you never slept with them, otherwise a question of consent.

Kinda like standing in a bank on the CCTV while it’s being robbed and being triggered that you’re a suspect.

Admitting half the deed casts valid legal suspicion. That’s exactly what rapists do.

It’s funny because men make various sexual slanders about sleeping with women they didn’t but they don’t care about lies and life ruin then. Sex is serious, slanders about it too. If you can’t handle that, avoid the opposite sex.

When guys lie about sleeping with a woman when they didn’t, that’s a joke. What reputation? When women lie about sleeping with a man they didn’t, it’s serious. Their life might be ruined by a rumour.

re Brock Turner

This even reached me, on hotel wifi.

You chose to drink alcohol? She didn’t say no, because she was unconscious? But you’re otherwise a Really Nice Guy (TM)?

Let me make this very clear.

There is no excuse for rape.
There is no excuse for rape.
There is NO. EXCUSE. FOR. RAPE.

If middle class white men can get away with this when they should be hanged, then the feminists are right about us.

I may joke about American Psycho, but  it’s a joke because these r-types think money makes morality.
Do not make excuses for your demographic. That is what the Left does. Rape is more disgusting than murder, at least murder victims don’t suffer long. The actions a person takes tell you who they are.

In other r-type news.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bestiality-legal-canada-supreme-court-a7073196.html

If a man is accused of rape, it’s probably true. Saying he’s innocent before you’ve seen the evidence (and there must be evidence to go to court) makes you as bad as the people who assume any white person is guilty.
I have a feeling a lot of the men defending this scumbag are only defending him because he’s a ‘man’ and if they were in the same position (how r-types think), they’d want to get away with it. At least, that’s how you all look to the rest of the world. I hate it when the feminists are right. He admits to doing it. He did it, there was no contract of consent between the two parties and he admits it and that action makes him a rapist, even if he hadn’t admitted it. It’s either sex, with consent, otherwise, it’s always rape (consent is never assumed). There is no excuse. He is remorseless and seems to think this is minor (Daddy’s Money can get me out of this, so rabbity), trying to talk his way out of it (r-types lie) and finds the suffering he’s caused amusing (welcome to reputation-ville, bitch). We should be stringing people like that up, they’re no better than the rapefugees. Plot twist: get the hangman really drunk, so he can’t help making the snotty bastard suffer first.

Manosphere, false rape accusations are RARE (Burden of Proof is on you). Those rarely go to court, and then they’re thrown out. Should we punish perjury? Yes, when anyone does it, even if they’re male, white and rich. Otherwise, special accommodation by the law is a bloody privilege. But we should punish even harder the detritus like this.

The rapists always pretend they’re innocent because muh dick excuse, even as they’re admitting they did it. There is no such thing as an excuse for rape. Theft, you might need to eat. Murder, you may be in mortal peril. Rape? NO EXCUSE. It’s called masturbation. Sex isn’t a need, it’s a desire, the body naturally expels the relevant fluids during sleeping hours. 

If a bloke will rape a woman without remorse, lying in court is a breeze.

You don’t just need to get your mud dicks cleansed, we have these monsters among ethnic Europeans too. We should treat them more cruelly in my opinion, so divorced from their heritage their actions. It’s closer to the average in non-Whites and their culture endorses it.

  • A child falls into a gorilla pen.
  • We kill the gorilla.
  • Man jumps into a lion cage.
  • We kill the lion.
  • Man is bitten by shark.
  • We kill the shark.
  • Rapist ruins at least one woman’s life, she would literally be better off dead than what he did to her.
  • Oh let’s be nice to him and forget all about it because he has a hobby??!!!

force

prison

The EU equivalent, gang rape by white men is now a “forced sex party”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36503178

Male Entitlement and Creepiness

The manosphere completely ignores the findings that support this reason (if you act like a creep, you’ll be labelled and treated as a creep, because that’s exactly what you are), they’re ignoring the connection to entitlement, a similar issue in rapefugees with Eve Teasing and Taharrush, who think they can go around forcing their various body parts on random women purely because these evil women tempted them with their attractiveness (sure, it starts with cornering them and using hands, cos that alone isn’t creepy…), ignoring all this connection because they’re bluepill pussies who can’t handle a truth that triggers doubt over their worldview, so I thought I’d post this one early. Note how they also ignored the finding of what women DO want? (Gentlemen). I guess their red pills must be suppositories.

As for the bitching about ‘Creep shaming’, it exists about as much as fat shaming (only works on fat people), because they must be basing it on something you did. 

As promised and this was originally based on;
http://www.doctornerdlove.com/2011/12/dont-be-a-creeper/all/1/
A heady dose of desperation in there too.

“In fact, because they don’t live with the same omnipresent threat that women do, they’re frequently offended by the idea that it’s their behavior that creeps girls out.”

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

10/10 truth, because as we know from SJWs, if you’re offended, you must be in the right!
How dare an adult be held morally and legally responsible for their action! They talk a big game about alpha but they don’t really wanna be held to the standard, do they? It begs the question, how many of their ‘false’ rape accusations are really false? Are they honestly retarded enough to think a judge will fall for “Yeah I isolated her from her friends and assaulted her when she told me to ‘fuck off’, and stalked her round the club, insisted she come back to mine but said an innocent reason, tried to force myself on her after plying with alcohol because she owes me, drinks are expensive, she said No clearly multiple times, but she didn’t really mean it, cos this guy online said it was OK to keep pushing through Last Minute Resistance and not use a condom even though I have STDs from fucking around like this, she froze in fear and cried after, she totally wanted this alpha cock. I’m not a rapist, how dare you falsely accuse me?

They literally can’t be that dumb, I refuse to believe it.
Don’t wanna be called a creep? Don’t be creepy. Don’t wanna be accused of rape? Don’t force a sexual act against the will of the other party (the act of coercion). It’s almost as if they haven’t read the local laws and solipsistic-ally think they’re above them (that could never happen to me! I’m too smooth! I’d never really force a woman, also, choking isn’t physical abuse and attempted murder, it’s foreplay), this ignorance of how warped they are and ignorant of the criminal law they often discuss without researching (!) is something I frequently mock PUAs for ignoring until it bites them on the ass, at which point the enforcement system is working, despite their pathetic mewls of victimhood. Do the crime, do the time, bitches. What they fail to mention in those cases is that rapists get accused too. Being accused doesn’t make you innocent, in fact, the odds drop significantly. Few victims come forward as is.

Moral of this: never trust a man who excuses his actions with ‘really’ e.g. really rape, real victim. He meets the definition, he did the thing and he’s trying to pick around it and excuse it (scum).

Most violent crimes are committed by men. This is a hatefact to the manosphere. We don’t walk down dark alleys or swear at gangs either. This type mock our precautions, while blaming us when some crime is committed (you can take all the precaution in the world, but criminals gonna commit crimes, it’s the criminal’s fault). They refuse to blame the male for his own actions, they don’t really believe a man can be creepy (potential rapist) or a ‘real’ rapist. They excuse the criminal’s behaviour based on their sex, there must be some ‘reasonable’ explanation, in the same vein that feminists excuse female borderlines when they attack partners (hey men, why not take the precaution of never dating a borderline? why put yourself in that situation if you didn’t secretly want it?).

Stranger danger exists beyond childhood, and if you’re approaching a stranger, whatever your sex, you need to make it clear you have no expectations to pressure them with, because the nature of walking up to someone is primitvely an attack and causes an instinctive defensive reaction.

“Leaving your hand on a girl for too long – even in a neutral place like the shoulder or middle of the arm – will read as though you’re claiming possession of her… or worse, that you’re going to drag her off somewhere.”

Ask yourself: is this what a rapist would do? Would a rapist establish physical contact to lead a girl down a dark alley, to his place after she’s too weak from intoxication to know what’s going on? Then why are you engaging in the process a rapist would take? Oh, you claim to care about consent, that it’s consensual? Then why ignore it multiple times? She steps away, you ignore it. Creep XP +10. She says to leave her alone, you disrespect it. Creep XP+20. She says No, you force it anyway. Creep XP+100, unless you’re forcing ‘sex’, which isn’t sex, it’s called rape. Those are the actions of a rapist. Defamation means creepy is a politer code for “this person is enacting the rapist script, danger, avoid”.

Modern women don’t want cavemen.

“Jokes about rape, abduction, physical assault or murder are off the table. Period.”

Yes, some of these self-important Casanova wannabes do that. Remember, Casanova died alone.
Don’t speak to a woman like a man down the pub. Ask yourself, what would a rapist say and do right now? And never do that. This isn’t rocket science, you are legally and socially culpable for your actions and words.

“Creepy guys will stick around long past the time when they were supposed to leave.”

The desperation of men who say they don’t need women, and treat a No as a Maybe.

“Most women are socially conditioned not to give offense or hurt men’s feelings and so they’ll rarely break off a conversation directly.”

If we are polite, we are ‘friendly’ and it’s an invitation to keep pestering us. If we are friendly, we are ‘flirting’ and a
‘tease’ who ‘owes’ you sex. If we are honest to save time, we are ‘rude’ stuck-up bitches. Socially, men are idiots. Everytime a woman hears the insult “you’re so rude” from a man, we can’t help but laugh, because they don’t even know what they did wrong. Naturally, pointing out what they did (educating them, the opposite of mansplaining) gets you call rude and possibly a know-it-all. Oh, how terrible, knowing things! Knowing social manners an adult should be expected to know and abide! What a disgrace to womankind, to know etiquette! To correct a man with the manners of a monkey! Does he feel ‘offended’ too? Was I supposed to stand here like his sex doll and waste my time listening to the random detritus of society lying because he feels entitled to my attention and thinks I’m stupid enough to fall for it? Literally, any insults shot at a woman along the lines of rude or crass or variations of ‘not womanly’ or ladylike are like the fat chicks who say they didn’t want that thin man anyway, he was too skinny. The ‘rude’ woman, to these morons, is simply being honest. The same bluntness they beg women to demonstrate in comments (why can’t women say what they mean? why can they be honest? – you insult us for it?), so they can fix what they’re doing wrong. The only thing they wanna fix is the outcome, they get sex whatever the woman herself thinks, ding ding rape charges. They can hardly call her wrong for noting his mistake. As an aside, women shouldn’t be grateful for male attention. Considering their frequent base motivations, it’s more of an insult (to assume she would be interested in servicing his lust). In a First World country, people are supposed to be nice to one another, socially. It doesn’t earn you anything.

See what happens when entitled men don’t get the reaction they expect.
elitedaily.com/dating/when-guys-expect-sex-and-dont-get-it/1450462/
Mantrums. Grown men throwing a wobbly like a toddler. ……Sexy……so alpha.….

Creep isn’t about male status, although lower class men are more likely to be creeps (and less likely to be gentlemen).
Creepiness is about personal danger and manipulation. In an individualist society where women are responsible for our own safety, we will be hypervigilant about creeps. Don’t like it? You’re probably a creep.
My advice to women? The immature boys among them will turn if you don’t give them an Out, a means to save face. Something like Thanks for the offer, at least you tried.
However, rudeness is always an option, and a viable acceptable one, if nothing less will work from the perspective of verbal self-defense. Guys, would you rather be hit for touching a random woman or told to fuck off? What does it matter if she’s single, that doesn’t make her available, she still doesn’t want you, that’s the only meaningful fact.
Respecting boundaries is easy for those with a decent upbringing and while I have sympathy for boys who grew up without father figures, as an adult, there is no excuse for ignorance. These guys wouldn’t go up and touch a stranger’s car, but they’d touch the owner’s wife? How damaged have we become as a society to think that’s the way round it should be?

This comment is wise;
Women are the ones who know what they find threatening. If a man puts them off for whatever reason, that is a valid reason. A woman always has a right to her opinion of a suitor.”

As in traffic law with the right of way, women have the Right of Rejection. Creepiness ignores a woman’s right to her body, her space and her own opinions (gaslighting manipulation). You cannot turn a No into a Yes. That’s called coercion and it obviates consent. 

Sexual predators in our culture try to pass themselves off as harmless to lure their prey. In our culture, that means Nice Guy geeks, who are normally lazy and trying to pass off insecurity as introversion, narcissism as art.
A woman is either interested or not. Attraction is not a negotiation. Approaching her will have no bearing on this, because you’re still the same person in both conditions. You approach to find out which one aka there is no way to engineer (manipulate, creep alert) the situation from a No into a Yes. People who promise you this magic cheat code to vagina (no care for the person attached) always line their pockets with your cash, because mind control could be put to better use by those with the secrets and allow them to take over the world. You’ve been conned as much as the guy who thinks he’s buying secrets to ‘game‘ the stock market.
That you want a woman who 1. doesn’t want you, 2. knowing she doesn’t want you, 3. yet continuing to push and force it, is the motivation of a predator, that’s why we respond like it. Want real advice you’ll never hear from ‘nerdy men’?
As far as relationship entitlement, they (a lot of geeks) expect the world while giving only their company (selective). They want a homemaker, cooking, cleaning and being the maid, the actions of a houseWIFE, but never giving the woman the security of marriage. They want financial equality though, which translates as being a drain because his hobbies are more expensive. They want the sex of a whore, and the variety without paying for it, romance is forced and must be nagged to be given in exchange. They seem to think emotional ignorance is masculine and refuse to admit women have valid needs too. They have a trail of exes they describe as confused, while unable to place why they broke up but unable to keep just one (I guess they’re all broken). Socially, they humiliate their women and fail to see a problem, blaming her high standards. In return, they want a sexualised version of their mothers, who couldn’t abandon them, no matter how immature and brattish they got. They see marriage as Game Over, you can stop trying now, put zero effort into the marriage and whine when they get divorced because apparently the woman lied to him when she told him what he failed to provide, giving multiple opportunities to address it. But he’s old-fashioned, right?
In these matters of the heart, actions are louder than words. If you fail to behave correctly, things will go ‘wrong’.
I don’t remember the good old days when men abandoned their women and failed in every conceivable way AS men in their gender role, but alright. What entitlement, right? Why aren’t the ladies swarming him? Ladies, not those whores he wants sex from. Ladies, who will act like whores for some reason, as if he’s the protagonist in a video game, prove he’s special to himself. Gentlemen? Those don’t exist anymore, he bitches. It’s unreasonable to hold him to that standard.
Women are people, not puzzles. What you see as brave persistence, a judge will see as a restraining order. Keep trying and trying, and you are a creep. There are no social respawns.
Women owe you nothing. Rejection is a fact of life.
Men owe you nothing either. Professional rejection happens too.
Pedants are trying to win big status points (whataboutism, yes BUT…, appeal to exception, appeal to anecdote). Someone responding socially to pedantry with rational counterarguments is humouring you in the hopes you’ll move on, not endorsing the methods. As in, a woman isn’t biting when she talks back, she’s trying to form a negative impression so you’ll leave. Unfortunately, these desperate losers see any kind of female attention, however negative, as encouragement and ideological endorsement. (I have written about the unfalsifiability of Shit Tests, everything rationalized as positive signs of attraction -very autiste-, and how No doesn’t really exist to these guys, it doesn’t penetrate their thick skulls, so how the hell are we meant to get you to leave, what other word is there? And you wonder why women ‘flake’, finally  act on their disgust and disinterest because you didn’t actually pick up on the feminine social cues like you thought, leaving you confused). Studies have shown men assume sexual interest where there is none, even disgust. Does the redpill lot care? Nope. It doesn’t confirm their beliefs so it must be wrong.
Affection isn’t based on charity or pity. Brush up your skills, bring something else to the table or GTFO. Dogs are nicer and elicit more sympathy than all humans, we don’t wanna sleep with them either. I’ve seen men so out of touch with reality show me pictures of them holding puppies thinking it will change my mind and make me fancy them. No. No no no no. Anymore than if I were to show you a picture of me holding a baby, you’d suddenly and immediately want me to be the mother of your children. That’s psychotic, people aren’t that dumb.
“But he’s so nice” other men say, well, in that case, you fuck him, dude. If you think he’s so nice, you fuck him yourself.
Don’t try to pimp out women with guilt, we all know those Nice Guys are 100% judging on appearance when they approach us, aka, they are nasty, they’re shallow pricks. We’re simply judging by the same superficial standard.

Genuine niceness doesn’t come with expectations and conditions. 

Women don’t stay with jerks and men don’t stay with bitches (unless both parties are, you deserve each other). If you want to become the SO and you’re jealous of them, they must be good people to admire, watch what they bring to the table and develop it for the next potential date. Don’t confuse an In spite of, with a causal Because of. For example, hot women can afford to be bitches, but bitchy women are not hot.

Tantrums are for children.

A final redflag: they argue with your OPINION.
Das gaslighting. Run, don’t walk.
Don’t be like Chucky Lopez, who writes;
“Cold approaches from a stranger are NOT identically equal to predatory behaviour.”
Walking up to a total stranger and trying to control their behaviour, dominate them according to your desires is exactly what a predator does. Sexual predators and con artists do exactly that, to extract something by force and take it for their own kick.
Ted Bundy played the Nice Guy and he cold-approached with a plaster cast. Do you think women don’t have these stories in the back of our minds when you act the same? He was handsome and creepy and crazy. It wasn’t an excuse. Note how even those who endorse it agree they are similar? The men who argue and moan and whine are actually trying to steal the feminine gender role of establishing social contact.

Historically, women have the Right to Approach men, clubs alone break this rule (sometimes) and shouldn’t (women have legs and we can use them). IOIs are actually recognition that women establish social contact (looking and smiling, waving, introducing ourselves).

Non-predatory socializing, by contrast, is introduced, via mutual friends, who attest to reputation. We live in a low-trust society and predators taking advantage of what used to be excusable faux pas (speaking to someone without introduction) has made it unacceptable. Women actually set the tone in engaging men socially, something men conveniently ‘forget’. A woman in a high trust society could speak to a random man, but not the other way around.

You are not entitled to socialize with a woman and force her attention and waste her time, as social circles are the Woman’s Domain, we have the social power and the social-emotional intelligence to boot. We outrank you here.
Why do you think the hostess receives visitors and makes introductions? By slighting our role in this and taking our singular social choice away, they disrespect us in public, while choosing to view it as a good sign of his strength (pigheadedness). They’re abolishing age-old gender roles, like a feminist.

Fun fact: the word “immorality”, the original meaning as used in previous centuries was a polite term for sexual immorality and promiscuity. As in, promiscuous people have no valid opinions on immorality. Ask a druggie about legalization. Dopamine highs, man. Sluts are by definition immoral. There was no other kind of immorality, like the feminists have tried to distinguish. Only religious failures of chastity, that applied to men too e.g. no adultery.

Roosh’s press conference, a breakdown

This will be brief but I wanted to highlight how ridiculous this is.
He thinks this makes him look good when he’s actually taking a dive like Anita Sarkeesian, he’s literally playing Victim Pro.

cool mocking shades yes peace

About as smooth as gravel.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/transcript-rooshv-press-conference-6216.html

Bear in mind the AS comparison, I’ll come back to it. Rebel outsider or precious victim, you can’t be both.
Bearing in mind, he said this before, to repeat myself;

https://archive.is/oh4Zo

I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it.”

Ready? Here we go.
(Also if someone wants to shop his face on that chicken, please be my guest).

Roosh: All right, are you ready? Is that a yes? Oh, we have a new one. Where do you work from?

Female Reporter: Um, Martha Stewart?

Roosh: Martha Stewart?

Female Reporter: Yes.

(Laughter)

Roosh: Okay, yeah, sure. I don’t know how she got in here. Someone must have told her. All right, so first I’m going to make a statement and then you can ask me anything. Cool?

Insulting a woman for doing her job for yet another woman is an excellent way to prove you aren’t a misogynist, what a way to begin. Someone give him a speech course for the Muslim equivalent of Christmas, please.

All right, so the world has gone insane in the past week.

Gaslighting the world press. I don’t think that’s gonna work.
But yes I’m sure the whole world is at fault, not you. #whatnarcissism

Why? Number one, I had organized meet ups around the world for men to enjoy a social happy hour to meet in private and talk about anything. Work, politics, girls, just to meet.

Just to meet. Is that why all the security? Code names, really?
When you say politics, is that a yes or no to foreign sedition?
When you say girls, (and not women,) do that include tuition on how to get them into bed when otherwise they might not?

Okay? Number two, a year ago I wrote an article How to Stop Rape. This article, to a 10-year-old, was obvious that I didn’t intend to legalize rape or cause harm against women.

He sounds like he’s implying his average reader has the IQ of a 10yo. It wasn’t even his worst article, I’ve covered his degeneracy, completely serious and claiming to be truthful, and I believe the Daily Mail used that post to cherry-pick a quote, I recognized my own work.
There’s a new concept called Schrodinger’s Douchebag, they’ll say something raw and depending on the reaction, will reveal whether they were serious (and edgy) or ‘only joking’ and blame you for what they said. As in, how could you think I meant the thing I composed in my head? I don’t think that’s gonna work on… what? Millions of people? A billion? Blame-shifting only works on the type of immature girl he prizes himself on targeting.

But starting on Sunday, a lot of you have lied by saying that I am a pro-rape advocate.

That was literally the point of the article. Thought experiment or no.
You did write IN advocacy of it. And specifically rape of women, which you never philosophically justified. Philosophers still advocate their positions, even when mocking them. Read a book?
I want to pull a Diogenes and hold aloft a chicken *cough* while proclaiming;
“Behold! I’ve brought you a man.” *Roosh softly cucking*

He wants women to get hurt!

You said it would teach them a lesson. How can that possibly be misinterpreted?
He’s gonna turn into a slang term at this rate, it’ll go from douche to Roosh the Douche and eventually just Roosh.

If you think I’m being harsh, he actually said: “Bad encounters are sure to occur, but these can be learning experiences for the poorly trained woman

Is this how feminists feel all the time? Victim blaming, minimizing, speaking of women like dogs, no blame on the criminal while he’s claiming victim in his own speech.

and  “The exception for public rape is aimed at those seedy and deranged men who randomly select their rape victims on alleys and jogging trails”
…unlike those seedy enough to use pick-up? getting them too drunk to consent? drugs not out of the question?

And then the third thing, you said the meet ups are about rapists. They want to gather to learn how to rape. They are going to exchange tips. Some of you have called it a rape rally! What the hell is that? A rape rally? So because of that I’ve been all over the world in terms of the news. Over 100 articles have been written.

This is especially interesting because he didn’t actually deny it. He’s catastrophized it (for questioning his *snort* moral fibre) but he didn’t say, ‘no, I’m not going to teach them how to take sex from unwilling women.’

He needs to be very careful about this because if he keeps implying legal action and talking big, a lawsuit might be started by a larger party to get in first, setting events off, and everything about him will come out. Possibly some past rape accusations such as when he lies about his name, as he admits to doing. Pick-up might even be outlawed from a case that large, defined as hate speech as I already explained the legal precedent in seduction law and fraud.

The result is what? I’m currently the most hated man in the world.

Please.

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

You’re like those celebrities who complain when cameras follow them.
You choose the work, you choose the attention. You don’t get to pick only the positive attention, big baby. And he slags off women for being whiny victims, can we say Projection?

Governments from all over the world have talked about me. Australia has tried to keep me out.

It’s their country, entitled prick. You were saying all about the perils of immigration in other articles.

They called up their Navy to keep me out because they thought that I was going to get in through a private yacht.

Cos you said you’d go by boat, sneaky little liar. He misses out, ‘forgets’ anything that makes him look culpable.

So the Navy got called up. In England, the House of Commons debated me for half an hour to say how I’m a bad man who shouldn’t be allowed entry.

Yes, I know, I’ve been there.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Where do you think they got that idea? You said you hated London, you told men never to go there (we need our tourist money), after all, why should we let you back? Nobody owes you a visa. Then you go on to slag off Glasgow for having Scottish soul. Roosh makes friends wherever he goes, how he does it, nobody knows….

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/daryush-valizadeh-watch-uk-parliament-debate-banning-repulsive-us-pickup-artist-1541972
“If criminal offences have been committed – including incitement of violence against women – then the government would expect local police forces to deal with any offenders appropriately.” That’s your formal warning, FYI.
Also, the sarcastic tone to naming “Return of Kings” is because they’re slagging off a real-life monarchy. In case you didn’t catch that. You bitches write about it, we live it. GSTQ.
Are you oppressed or not? If so, you can’t be surprised the Man (the local law you PUAs keep ignoring) is keeping you down. If not, you’re a liar.

Mayors from everywhere, Canada, have said were going to keep him out (like they could anyway they are just a mayor, a mayor can’t keep someone out). The governor of Texas said the same thing. Police from everywhere said that all meetups will be monitored.

Public meetups. If you meet up IN PUBLIC, it’s a public meetup. That’s what words mean.

A private meetup for men is going to be monitored. 1984 is here.

It isn’t private. Anyone could show up. It isn’t on private property, at best rented. Land laws aren’t the same, it’s a semi-public space, so banning anyone on demo grounds is illegal. As he admitted, there is a political motive I’m sure intelligence services will be looking into, and those need to be filed and registered with the proper authorities, ahead of time. Even SJWs have to do this. You can’t go to a foreign land and expect their laws won’t apply to you…. unless you’re a Roosh.

Worst of all, my family’s address was put on the Internet through the hacking group Anonymous

Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

ah, that name again…

comes up a lot doesn’t it?

and your colleagues at the Daily Mail confirmed the doxx and say that I my mom’s meatloaf everyday.

DM is a gossip rag, as the writers will freely admit down the pub. They like ‘spoons. Nobody takes it seriously. They post on the Queen, cancer and various outrage porn. Most of the writers are preening middle-class toffs, like the Sun, which is toffs being ironic. The Guardian is toffs being hilariously serious.

Dozens of threats have come in.

Ooh, dozens. Is that more or less than AS? ZQ? Is this a competition now?
He said multiple times we shouldn’t take online bullying seriously, that the threats weren’t real so these SJWs should get over it.

Someone said that they’re going to burn my house down but save my mom. So I’m glad, but you have to understand that your work and the work of your own colleagues have incited a mob based on lies that has put my family in danger. If they get hurt right now, God forbid, it’s because of you. It’s because you didn’t read a damn article, you misinterpreted, and now we have this rage mob to where, as you can see, I had to hide this. I told you don’t tell anyone.

He’s a thirty-something year old MAN and he’s still pointing the finger and blaming other people for his fuck-ups?
Notice he doesn’t blame the victim when it might be him?

I must state right now that not a single woman has been hurt by me.

He didn’t use the r-word… odd diversion…
And the oven-worthy post proves that emphatically false.

I’ve never been accused of rape.

Give it time.

I’ve never been charged.

That’s… not the same thing…..

No follower of mine has read something by me and then gone to rape because I know if they did hurt a woman it would be all over the news. Not a single woman has been hurt.

Big talk.

Yet, there is a real rape mob somewhere and there is media from the country where that mob is. Who wants to volunteer what country has an active rape mob? What happened on New Year’s Eve in Cologne?

Typical rabbit.
You’re ganging up on me, you should feelbad! Don’t look at me, look at that guy! That other guy! Let’s you and him fight! [Roosh is a woman confirmed]
Ignore the Muslim predator writing books encouraging brown men to take Europe, country by country, calling all white women whores for these other Muslims in Europe, going country to country, calling white women whores! That makes me doing it O.K.! Right?

also, “active rape mob” – subconsciously, he’s thinking he runs the passive rape mob, who could be that overt about it but prefer trickery, and that makes it morally acceptable

Does anyone know? Someone? On New Year’s Eve mobs of men assaulted women, they raped them, and what did you guys do? You covered it up.

that was just the German Government, wrong audience, get a lesson pls

So when a real rape happens that goes against the agenda of your boss, you actually hide it. But then when no rapes happen and I try to do a meetup you lose your shit.

Nothing happened because you cancelled it, can, can he hear himself?

So I just wanted to come here just to state that not only are you guys not honest in your reporting of me but that no one has been harmed and when real harm takes place you don’t say anything. That is not right and not fair. I pray to God that nothing happens to anyone that is close to me and if it does it’s your fault. That’s my statement.

No, who started it?

Typical rabbit.

I might’ve talked shit but he punched me! I might’ve slapped him but then he hit back! Wah wah wah! I could never be the instigator!

I’m surprised he isn’t crying. You can get fake tear stuff online.

All right, is there anything else?

Reporter: Why do you think people think of you as a rapist?

Roosh: They need a target to get all the rage that the citizens have to put it on someone that doesn’t conflict with the agenda of your bosses and the ruling establishment. Roosh, go after him, it doesn’t matter if he gets hurt but we can’t go against our immigrant agenda. We can’t go against the feminist agenda. So we need to get the masses (the idiots who believe the stuff that you write) and put it on to something else. So you put it on me. I’m just a scapegoat. They are just using me.

Bear in mind what I re-quoted up top.
He asked for it.
He really wanted it.
He was gagging for it.

Yes, those are common appeals to the jury from rapists.

You know what really bothers me here? How low, how cheap, how evil, does a person have to be to use rape victims like that? For his own ‘agenda’? As a Get Out of Jail Free card? Not even that, a Criticism-Free Card.

But, I’m going to harness this. I’m going to harness all this coverage that you guys are giving me and convert it to money and women. That’s what I’m going to do. That’s the job that I have to do. I’m getting emails from a lot of girls right now and I plan (once this drama dies down if I can survive it) I may have to get in touch with them. That’s what you given me. You have made me one of the most famous men in the world. Granted, it was a lie. It was a lie. But hey, this is where we are right now so I’m going to work with what you gave me.

IF I did it……

….and he’s going to keep doing it. Officially, after this point, he deserves no empathy whoever he tries to rope in. He chooses to continue doing the same thing, and in an SJW-esque display of madness, expects a different result.

Female Reporter: Do you acknowledge that any of your writing might be genuinely offensive or upsetting to some people?

Roosh: So what?

He thinks that is a macho response. Pause. Drink it in.

American Psycho is the best satire of the 20th century

Like a little ghetto bitch.
Yeah, I called you a ho, so what? What are you gonna do about it, fight me? #seconds later# omg I can’t believe you hit me you crazy bitch!

If you make your private life public information, we’re allowed to judge. Again, you put your name, face and intimate life out there (in nauseating detail). You rejected your own legal right to privacy on those topics.

Female Reporter: Do you blame all of their reaction solely on media misinterpretation?

Roosh: I blame them for not reading what I write, for taking the mentality of a 10-year-old kid.

The ever-mature, You’re just too stupid to appreciate my genius! emo kid line.

Female Reporter: Your writing is offensive on its face.

Roosh: So what? So what? I have freedom of speech.

in AMERICA

in AMERICA

#grabs speakerphone#

IN AMERICAAAAAA.

(aka not where you wanted to hold your meetings)

Be offended, good, that means my writing got you.

3edgy5u

spot the fallacy: if you’re upset, you must be wrong

answer: non-sequitur

Female Reporter: So you acknowledge that you did provoke some of this yourself.

Roosh: I acknowledge that as a writer my job is to get attention and I did it. Right? But so what if you are offended. So what if I make fun of you? Is that we’re at right now that we can’t write things that hurt people’s feelings?

We’ve always been at that point, I wouldn’t expect you to understand. This is called the First World. It’s called etiquette and it’s the reason your ancestors came here from that Muslim shithole where gang rape is a fun family sport. How has nobody mentioned his sister? Must I do everything?

You can write whatever you want.
You can’t complain about the reaction.
Except you are. Is he borderline cos that would explain the entitlement and the constantly striving after a (neomasculine) identity.

Good, get offended, feel something, but don’t lie. Don’t lie. And that’s what you guys have done.

Don’t lie, says the guy who lies about his name.

Male Reporter: So do you consider yourself a victim in this scenario?

Roosh: You know what? No. [acts like it] I take full responsibility for everything that I have done but that doesn’t mean that I can’t state what you did wrong. [shifting the blame] I’m not saying “oh, I wish I could turn back the hands of time. I wish I didn’t write that article.” No, I wrote it. It came from my mind and it’s going to stay. But if you did something wrong then I get to  call you out on it too. Right?

He… he thinks he’s a moral authority.

scoff skarsgard

Female Reporter: So, do you have any regrets about publishing the article?

Roosh: None. None.

A man with a conscience would have mentioned his mother. I guess he ‘forgot’ to care now the topic of his own pain is off the menu and her shield status has expired.

Female Reporter: Well, you added this was a thought experiment this week. Do you regret not adding that early on?

That’s my question.

Roosh: I regret that people are so stupid that I have to put that in there right now. I never imagined that people would take that in a literal way to lie in order to push their miserable agenda. I never thought that you guys would lie about it. But now, because the masses believe the nonsense that you write, I have to treat everyone like an eight-year-old kid and say this [wait, say it? it wasn’t?] was a thought experiment even though to anyone who is not an idiot should have known that.

You should know the true meaning of what I write without me having to say, even though, as a writer, my entire purpose is clarity. He wants us to read his mind.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

Reporter: So why did you write it originally?

Roosh: Because I am a writer #slowclap# and I write things to make a point. That article was making a point about personal responsibility. That a woman’s safety is not only in the hands of men but it’s in their own hands too. That’s why. I guess that point didn’t get through, so on that account I did fail. I failed to give the point but that doesn’t mean that I did anything wrong. I did not.

#speechless#

Reporter: So a woman that got raped did something wrong.

Roosh: You know, if a woman got raped that is a sad thing. That is a bad thing.

Have you ever seen serial killers confess?
They feel the need to point out murder is bad, repeatedly, because they expect nobody else will know or remember if they don’t. That’s how out of touch this is.

But whose fault is it? #facepalming# Is it the woman fault? No, I’m not saying that. [literally just did, previous sentence] But a woman can do things to reduce the likelihood that she will get hurt. If I get a BMW car right now and I leave the key inside and I park it in a bad area and it gets robbed. Whose fault is that? Is it the thief’s fault? Or is it my fault for being a moron?

He keeps digging.
You think he’s done, but NO-

he keeps-

DIGGING.

There shouldn’t be thieves. Or rapists. That’s the moral point. You are a moron.

Reporter: It’s the thief’s fault.

Roosh: Okay, but would you advise me to leave the key in there? Of course not! Only an idiot would. So okay, so I’ll go ahead and be an idiot but don’t be mad when her car gets stolen. Just do the right things to keep yourself safe. We can’t even tell people what to do anymore to keep themselves safe? That’s weird.

By that logic, you could tell a person to do absolutely anything as long as you say it will keep them safe. Who are you to control other people? Who are you?

Reporter: When you say thought experiment, what was the thought experiment? What specifically?

Also my Q.

Roosh: The thought experiment is that if the government wasn’t completely holding the hand of adult women every step of the way and telling them that nothing you can do is wrong, maybe they would do a little bit of a better job not incapacitating themselves with alcohol and drugs and meeting random guys on the Internet that they don’t know and going to his house to watch Netflix.

You …teach men to do that. Just that. That’s literally your life’s work.
Doesn’t that make you the more responsible party?

sex with actual women mgtow infight

I think I could get laid by more women than Roosh. They certainly hit on me often enough.

Okay, and let’s hold men completely responsible for trying it on with a woman who isn’t 100% willing? Yes? No? Oh, you don’t think they’re a rapist? The Government shouldn’t completely hold the hand of adult men every step of the way and tell them nothing they do is wrong! Meeting random girls is risky! Drinking alcohol on a night out too! If you take that risk, you deserve a true/false rape accusation! For being a moron!

See how this works?

Reporter: But is this experiment just one blog post? Is it a website? Is it books?

Reporter 2: Can you just break down the lie? What I mean by that is can you break down the the crux of your article? Because some people here are unfamiliar, at least I am. I’m not from the Daily Mail.

Roosh: Can you read? I mean can you guys go. No, look guys, you want me to break it down. Read it!

The Do you even lift? of replies.

Down down down he goes…

Reporter: I mean how it got twisted by the media.

Roosh: The media said that the article said that this man wants to legalize rape. That was a lie.

WHY YOU MORON. HOW. SPECIFICALLY. REASONS. LOGIC.

Reporter: Okay, what part of your satirical argument that you’re making can you maybe understand that they took and turned it into that lie?

Roosh: Not honest. They were not honest and they knew it. The people who wrote that and said that the article is true, that that is a “pro-rape” article, they lied. That’s it. They are lying people. Most people in the media are liars.

He just keeps saying they’re liars without explaining as if that’s gonna wash.
Also, saying that to the media? Not smart. Doesn’t he call himself an entrepreneur?

Reporter: So you made a suggestion in this article which was what? Because I haven’t read it.

Roosh: Are you listening to what I’m saying, my friend? I’m telling you that I tried to make a point about personal responsibility. That’s what I did. Okay? You missed that point. Everyone here did. Some people got it. 

Is English his first language?

Reporter: Is this like a multi-year point though? You been trying to do this for like four, five, six years. What about, like, Return of Kings?

Roosh: Okay, is there an article there that you don’t like? That you got offended by?

Reporter: Well, on the front page as soon as you get there one click away it gives you a list of articles to read on “Rape Culture” Was Manufactured To Wage An Unjust War Against Men.

Roosh: Bingo.

WHYYYY.
I put myself through this so you guys don’t have to.

Reporter: The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men. The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace.

Roosh: Okay, you’re just reading headlines, man. Read the articles.

YOU WROTE THE FUCKING HEADLINES.
The outrage! The posturing! Faux brain cells!

Unless he’s admitting to writing clickbait, which makes him no better than the media he slags off.

Reporter: Is this is part of your thought experiment?

Roosh: No, these articles are making a point. [you said the same thing about the rape one] They provide evidence. [no] They provide arguments. [hella no] You’ve read it and you take from it what you want [you can’t write for toffees?] but don’t then go into your media outlet to lie about it. [you haven’t explained the lie though, still, making us doubt there was one]

Reporter: Is the satire something else?

Roosh: How to Stop Rape was a satirical article.

as opposed to…?

Reporter: Okay.

Roosh: These are not.

None of the others? Is this official? So unless tagged, serious?

Female Reporter: So, you know the outrage isn’t only about that one article. A lot of people think that you’re writing about women in general being submissive and [bad audio]. It’s also offensive.

Roosh: I don’t care. #press conference holds shakily#

Female Reporter: Is that something that you believe?

Roosh: Do I believe that a woman should submit to a man? Yes. Does that mean that my family’s address should be put online because of that? And the media should stake out their home because of what I write? No. Using these lies to incite these idiots on the Internet? No.

Wait, that is rape. That is literally the definition of rape, the physical, sexual submisson part. Yes, you do believe in rape. What does Islam mean again, to submit? Submission is not a choice or regarding of consent or human freedom, it is forced. He is trying to play traditional people with this neomasculinity crap but we know the use of the words we choose and it’s submission of a wife to her husband, as they mutually agreed in their vows, not A woman to A man, a random man she owes nothing.

No woman should submit to him because he is a bachelor, a word as insulting as spinster because they require no social respect. The command about submission only applies to married folk, and only when there is a conflict (rare), it doesn’t mean She Does Everything He Says. It means the woman backs down in the event of a dispute within the house. That’s it, a small trivial point rarely exercised. A woman is not a slave (his inner Muslim is coming out). The majority of the time they are a team, a single unit, the House against the World, such an imbalance of tyrant and slave would drive the marriage to dissolution.

Hark the entitlement goes deeper.

Reporter: What’s your justification for believing that women should be submissive? That seems to be…

Roosh: I’m not here to argue why I believe what I do. #yes# #yes you are# Okay? You have to go online, I’ve been writing for years and years, if you really care about that go do your homework. I’m just here to talk about the events of the past week.

He sounds like an omega in this. They’re spiteful and vengeful. They’ll obsess for years and plot. Reams of paper he spilled ink on these topics, it would make sense.

Reporter: I did read some of the things that you wrote and I’m curious and a lot of people here meeting you for the first time are curious to know where you…

With these rude interruptions (why are PUAs always rude little shits?), he’ll get a little dot by his name on their files.
Code Don’t Go Easy.
Keep digging, fool.

Roosh: I really think that you guys don’t read things. You see, Caitlin will write something

Note how the stupid wrong person in his examples is always female?

and you’re like “Okay, Caitlin’s article it’s getting hits so I’m going to copy and paste hers”. So it’s like a game. You guys are writing the same thing. I’m just try to understand what is happened. As you can see of been under a lot of stress [AMYG-DALA!] from all this mob that is coming after me because of the things that you wrote that don’t conform to the real world. I don’t get it. And it’s clear to me that you guys haven’t done your research. You’re ready to write that this guy is pro-rape without knowing where that false idea comes from.

Remember: rabbits project.
It’s you! It’s your fault! You’re deluded! They can’t possibly have read what I wrote because it’s impossible to disapprove of, even though I said I like offending people [above] and even if they did disapprove, I don’t care, so what? What are they gonna do, hit me?
#wait#
Stop talking about the things I wrote after I said multiple times in this very speech I enjoyed the attention!

Female Reporter: Roosh, I have a question for you from the Bang books. So I obviously have done my research and there are several instances…

Roosh: I know. She has known about me.

Female Reporter: …There are several instances in the Bang books where you recount having sex with women who were too drunk or incapacitated to consent. Now people reading that would certainly come away with the impression that you raped those women.

Man is drunk? Roosh calls it rape and backs the MRAs, bleating about ma ooman rights. The rapist must be locked up! This is evil!
Woman is drunk? Roosh calls it seduction and charges men to read about it. He must be respected in his ‘rights’ and allowed to profit and say anything Little Rooshie feels like! This is good – for men!

But he doesn’t hate women! He just treats us differently! …. Less human. That isn’t misogynistic….

#sound of flickering dictionary pages#

Here’s the definition of misogyny!

Hatred of females.
(under Hatred, this is a Psychology Dictionary)
A deep, enduring intense emotion expressing animosity, anger and hostility toward a person, group or object. Hatred is usually assumed to be characterized by a) the desire to harm or cause pain to the object of the emotion and b) feelings of pleasure from the object’s misfortunes. [rabbits’ MO, clearly we need to scan Roosh’s brain, Roosh, the guy who admits to watching rape porn]
(under Sexism)
A prejudice based on sex. …First, a prejudice is generally treated as an attitude or belief, while the term sexism generally connotes differential action and behaviour towards persons which discriminates them on the basis of their sex. Second, the term is nearly always used with respect to discrimination against females, a unitary focus that derives from the objective data of society but which unfortunately delimits the meaning of the term.

See? Completely different to what Roosh does.
Not.

Most of his articles are literally sexist. That’s why feminists mention ‘double standard’ so often, holding a double standard on the basis of sex (not some other third factor) is literally sexist. He does it all the time. As I pointed out, in that pro-rape article, he wanted not rape legalized, but specifically the rape of women. That is the very definition of sexism. Like if I said ‘men can’t be primary caregivers’ that is purely based on their sex, nothing about possible ability for the act (individual-based potential/likely ability is moot for discussion, it doesn’t matter), and marks them out, discriminates them as subject on the basis of their sex. Their demographic group. Ding ding Prejudice Lane.

Roosh: I don’t know anyone except for maybe you that thinks that [Reggie? Can we get Reggie Yates on line 1 Cheryl?] and people who have lost their minds when it comes to consensual sex. [gaslighting again oh dear]

Also, consensual sex is just sex. No need to point it out.
~coughs and points to the serial killer thing~

People who don’t have any idea what girls are doing outside right now and what they will do in an hour or two once they get drunk and pick the guy that they like and let him do whatever he wants with her. So macho sex writing, to convert that to rape takes such a leap of faith that you have to be a liar to think that’s true.

Questioning someone’s true memory of a thing you literally wrote is also gaslighting.

Could you all imply my facepalming so I needn’t type it?

Female Reporter: You literally say that they were too incapacitated to consent.
#cheering from the peanut gallery#
Roosh: Macho sex writing is not a court. It’s not a piece of evidence that you can… Maybe some things I wanted to come across as an aggressive guy. Maybe I did. But just because there doesn’t means that there is a victim out there and she suffered. Have I raped anyone? No.

wow omg likey

Actually real name/identity blog posts and published works are admissible in a court of law.
European law, at least.
And if you’re selling books as true, when you know you fudged the details, that is Passing Off and other trade infractions, including fraud…

It seems like a matter of time before he’s literally telling it to the judge. Never seen a speech this bad. None of them are even lawyers, can you imagine? They could sell the court tape, I’d buy one.

Reporter: Is that fiction?

Roosh: No. It’s not. My interpretation of it may be, but she’s just taking quotes out of context anyway.

no =/= maybe
either it’s a quote OR it’s out of context

and he’s calling them stupid?

Reporter: You made a point that you have an office that overlooks a golf course. You made that clip about speed before is that true?

Roosh: Golf course?

Reporter: Yeah.

Roosh: I have no idea what you’re talking about. Golf course?

Reporter: Yes, you have an office that overlooks a golf course.

Roosh: I don’t remember ever saying that, man.

I do not recall.

Reporter: You mentioned the immigrant agenda and the feminist agenda before. I’m trying to get a better idea of what your personal politics are.

Roosh: I would say that it’s anti-globalists which the Daily Beast represents a globalist type of platform.

You travel the world, for work, you are a globalist.

Reporter: What do you mean by globalist?

Roosh: Anything that benefits the current top 1000 men in the world in the US and Europe. You have a globalists and you have the nationalists. I would lean more towards a nationalist. Tradition, patriarchy, local solutions instead of globalization.

hahaha fuck you

Degenerate scum thinks it’s people. Pat pat.
You wish you were cool.
You didn’t wanna know before the power balance shifted. Called us all sorts of things for defending our countries, even now when we enforce our borders against the likes of you.
A Patriarchy (married men, fathers) would hang him (bachelor) in the town square for seduction and rape.
Patriarchy is not kind to men. It is cruel to bachelors and spinsters. Patriarchy is kind to traditional people who don’t ‘play’ around (ever) and spread disease (he admitted he’s failed to use condoms).

BTW You don’t deliver ‘local solutions’ by skipping the country.

Reporter: So does that mean you’re voting for?

Roosh: Donald Trump comes the closest to what I think is true.

Please let Trump ban him from the USA as a Muslim. Please. It’d be so funny. Cancel his passport one time, just to see his face.
I happen to know for a fact that Mr Trump is a delightful fellow in private, who loves women. He won’t side with you, Roosh the Douche. He is married with children. Note the rabbity technique of siding with the largest group, largest reputed male authority figure, trying to pass themselves off as One of Us? For personal protection?

#chicken noises#

Female Reporter: You express concern about your family after you were doxxed. Does that make you regret threatening to doxx reporters and protesters? Who…

Roosh: I never threatened that. I said I was going to make a list of the names and the social networking accounts. I never said I was going to share their address. That was another lie. Another lie is that I live with my mom. It’s like you guys can’t stop lying. A man can’t visit his mom? I wished I lived with her! But no, that was a lie. See now, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say it but I live somewhere in Europe.

…………………I’m guessing on a visa?

So I’m just here for a short time and I happen to be here and the Daily Mail… I have to say though they had a lens that was far away I was like what’s that over there and you see on the Internet it was right there so… There’s people outside my dad’s house now probably.

http://europe.newsweek.com/roosh-v-return-kings-meeting-422724
Literal Quote: “We must hold journalists fully accountable for their incitement.”
If the post was innocuous, why did he lock it?

Female Reporter: You own that house then right?

Roosh: No, I don’t own the house.

Female Reporter: It’s registered in your name.

Roosh: Well, I don’t know how. #cringe#

Female Reporter: So it’s not your house?

Roosh: It’s not my house. Okay let me stop that and start again. So I don’t want to stay here all night with you guys. I have other things that I have to do so were going to wrap this up at 8 o’clock. Cool?

All that talk of being liars, he sure wants to put a stop to any easy Y/N questions…

Reporter: What else has happened these last couple of days? Did you get dozens of [bad audio]. Has your phone been ringing off the hook? Or your parents’ phone?

Roosh: You know, I think from a security standpoint it’s not smart to share that kind of stuff.

Like he said about celebrity rape claims, we can’t just believe him because he said it happened. Without proof, he must be lying. We have to assume that first now. There are just too many professional victims going around trying to rentseek, sorry.

Reporter: Where do you office out of? Do you find yourself writing on the road?

Roosh: There’s a golf course that is outside of my office… No.

(Laughter)

Roosh: I’m mobile, so um. Office out of, I never heard that kind of phrase before (laughs) but Starbucks? You know?

Reporter: Can you confirm that you did have to upgrade the DDOS protection on the website after the threats?

Roosh: We already had it because my servers were attacked last year. So we already had the systems in place but they were sending 20 million false requests every hour.

Reporter: Actually 20 million?

Roosh: Yeah, that’s the actual number.

Sounds like an anon op.

This was on Tuesday. Monday and Tuesday. Once the Australian thing hit. Now I must say, when the Australia thing hit that was a lot of fun because those people were obsessed about me and I was telling them that I was to come in by boat. But then the shit kind of got real once it came here, you know? Having fun with them is good but when they announce your address and are advising people to go down that then it’s no longer fun.

What, see you in person? For your shitposting online? Right of reply?
Hey, you wanted meetups.
Someone could even say you needed to take some… ‘personal responsibility’.
The only person responsible for your safety, after all, is yourself. If someone attacks you, it might not be entirely their fault. Something you wrote might have provoked them in the same way a short skirt might provoke a rapist. That was the key takeaway message of the article, wasn’t it? That if you can’t completely ensure your physical safety, and nobody can, crime perpetrated against you is somehow your fault. Even a little?

Reporter: Would you say that media misinterpretation is the best thing that ever happened to you?

Roosh: The best and the worst. I mean what’s going to happen now? I’m going to be known, because of you, as a pro-rape advocate for the rest of my life until I die. Oh, that’s the guy that believes that all women should be raped. But at the same time they’re going to say that’s the guy. They’re going to know me. I could take a dump in a box right now and sell it because of you. So that’s what you have done to me. You have made me such a famous guy. I was a guy with the blog, just a guy with a blog, and you have taken me from here to this based on a lie. Now, I’d rather you had not done that but it happened and that is life right? So you’ve got to deal with what actually happens.

Reporter: Would you consider donating some of that money to a rape crisis center?

Roosh: (laughs) I mean I think that the fact that the entire mainstream is trying to stop rape and assault against women I think they’re doing fine. But if they want to donate money to me to help with the bodyguards that I have to hire right now then they are more than welcome to.

Wait, wait –what?

We’re meant to feel sorry for you because YOU don’t feel physically safe?
Are you fucking kidding?

I just… I can’t even. Wow. Just wow. Such irony. Much sexism. Wow.

Reporter: How many bodyguards do you have around you right now?

Roosh: Unfortunately, I can’t share that right now but you can count which guys back there are kind of large, you know?

How many are ROK readers?
Zero, because they’re all pussies.

Reporter: So what are the plans for the next couple of days?

Roosh: The next couple of days is really, probably, to get out of town since it is a little bit hot right now.

Run rabbit run rabbit
run run run…

It’s not that I really think someone is going to come and stab me but it’s not smart to stay in the city where everyone knows where I am at. So I will probably go up or down the East Coast.

Reporter: How often do you return for your mom’s meatloaf?

Roosh: I come for the meatloaf once a year for like one month. And hey, you know, I like to stay with her. I wish I could stay more. I was trying to stay for a month but now, because of this, I had to say goodbye to her.

Mommy Issues.
Hey, he calls the opposite on random women all the time, I think that’s fair.

Reporter: Have you had any trouble traveling internationally yet and you expect it?

Roosh: No. I think England did not go ahead and say that I’m banned. I don’t think Australia will let me in now.

That’s cos you cancelled beforehand. It was unnecessary.

Reporter: Do you plan on trying to go to Australia?

Roosh: I don’t see why I would go there. Yep.

Female Reporter: What does your mom think about all this?

Roosh: My mom is angry. My mom is very angry.

Female Reporter: At you?

Roosh: Not at me. At you guys. She wants me to hit you guys back. Like you don’t understand a Middle Eastern mom, they get angry. I’m having to calm her down because she wants to fight. I’m saying Mom you gotta simmer down now. But no, she said son I support you, do what you gotta do, this is a matter of your speech and as long as you’re not doing anything illegal.

His mother is more of a man than he’ll ever be.
Not a good man, supporting that, but still.
When it comes out he’s done something illegal (over so many years there must be something that sticks) I wonder what she’ll do.

Reporter: What does she think of your treatment of women?

Roosh: Treatment of women? My mom doesn’t know. My mom doesn’t know how I make love to this girl or that girl. [but you film it] She knows who I am. She knows that whatever I write on the Internet and the monster that you have made me there that I have never hurt a woman. [no she explicitly said she supports you AS LONG AS you aren’t a criminal, there’s a catch] You would think by now, guys, that one girl would come forward and say “Yeah, Roosh did it, he raped me”.

Is he seriously tempting fate that hard?

One, you would think. Not one has come forward. Not one. Even though I have been known everywhere. So how do you explain that? Not one.

He seems to be implying that rape doesn’t count unless it’s recorded.
As if plenty don’t go to the police for whatever reason. They can still come out later.
#coughs Bill Clinton, Bill Bill Clinton Bill#
Just because you’ve been alright so far doesn’t mean you’ve got away with it.

It is weird how a lie can get to this point in time. So I’m not sure what the function of the media is because if you’re just going to lie and when the public is really in threat like in Germany was. Women in Germany right now are in threat. You don’t protect them but you come against me, what are you doing?

Reporter: The media cover that pretty extensively. I can email you a bunch of… (offers proof)

Roosh: After the outrage came. From day one? No.

Reporter: That is absolutely not true.

Reporter is correct. Roosh is lying. The media is covering it plenty, actually.
Previously, they were blocked by politicians in the EU, because it was an ongoing case and they didn’t want the illegals to disappear and skip to another country, that wasn’t the media per se. Blame Schengen.

Reporter: Back to what Caitlin was saying earlier, do you at least agree that, legally speaking, the technical legal definition that a woman is too drunk to consent to sex and you have sex with her, that is legally defined as rape. Can you at least…

Roosh: How about the man? If the man is drunk, can he consent to rape? [impossible]

Reporter: We can talk about that in a moment.

Roosh: No, no. It’s the same thing.

If it’s the same thing, and drunk men are categorically raped, then yes, you did rape them, the drunk women.

Reporter: No, no, no, you’re not answering the question.

Roosh: You’re not going to tell me what is right and wrong.

Spoken like a true psychopath. Indignation over questioning their morality, because they have none, so they won’t be able to explain it (like how he couldn’t explain the supposed lie).
They don’t actually know, that’s the joke. They change it, verbally, as they need to manipulate people.

Reporter: Okay, woman, man, whatever, that is a legal definition of rape. Do you disagree with the legal definition of rape?

Roosh: If a man is drunk and a woman has sex with him is it rape?

Reporter: Yes.

Female Reporter: It is not the legal definition of rape in many places though.

Reporter: In many places no…

Roosh: You’re trying to redefine the definition of consensual sex so that every man is on the hook for rape. That is what you’re trying to do. So no, I don’t agree with you.

No, the example was a female rapist.
He’s trying so hard to be a psychopath with this I’m gonna say borderline again, they idolize psychos.
Apparently drunk men are fair game to him from now on. So hey, let’s wait until he’s drunk and pay a really fat feminist to sleep with him. Come on, it’ll be funny. We can film it (since he also advocates that every time a man has sex) and split the royalties.

Reporter: Do you believe Bill Cosby is a rapist?

Roosh: I haven’t seen all of the evidence but I think that it’s weird that 20 years after… [that’s a No despite drugging them, hmmm…, will anyone ask if he’s handled drugs?]

Reporter: If any of these women came back and said “Oh, Roosh did whatever”, here is somebody with a long history of…

Roosh: The evidence that I have seen is girls wanted to be with him and take drugs with him, and then 20 years after that say that he hurt them.

No, they didn’t want to, that’s why he slipped it in their drink.
Deception.
And why would they want to take drugs that make them unconscious? Out cold? With no memory? Drugs a rapist would use, that give no thrill to the victim? And why would he wait for sex until they were out cold?

The Muslim genes express themselves eventually, don’t they?
He literally doesn’t see the problem. He is blind to it. He cannot see, like Bill’s victims after the coffee.

Reporter: So you don’t agree that that is a legal definition of rape?

Roosh: I don’t think that they are being honest.

That was a yes or no question. He’s being evasive at his own gig.

Reporter: If they were?

Roosh: If they were, look man I’m not a lawyer. See this is where we are right now where the mainstream is so obsessed about rape. [no you chose the topic to write that article] We don’t even know what consensual sex [just sex, it isn’t sex without consent, it’s rape] is anymore. This is what we have done. [sharing the blame? no that fails] So no you’re coming after me for an article where, clearly, I didn’t intend for people to think that I want all rape to be legal. [no not all rape, just rape of all women] So we’ve lost our minds. [gaslighting] From now on about sex, the United States is just gone. [then revoke your citizenship] We don’t know what sex is anymore. We don’t know what consensual sex is anymore and that’s because of the work that you have done.

Normal people with a healthy conscience know what consent is.
They have never required the media to inform them.

Reporter: How did this become your issue? We all have different issues we care about passionately, how did this become yours?

Roosh: It’s not my issue. I’ve written over 3000 articles and maybe 10 of them were about rape.

Yes, like “How Women Train Men to Rape“.
And, remember that serial killer confession point again?
How could I forget “Six Reasons You Should Not Rape A Girl.
Hint: None of them are ‘because it’s evil‘.

His #1 reason? It hurts your penis. …How would he know?
He goes on to list “Hypothetical reversals” for when it’s acceptable. No really.
#2 Self-exposure to STDs. #wait for it#
#3 Prison (being caught)
#4 Child support (I am not making this up)
#5 Hookers are easier.
“Hypothetical reversal: You want to experience the rush that comes from committing a felony.” He sounds experienced.
#6 Finding a slut and tricking her into bed is easier (and presumably not rape in his twisted mind).
Considering all the blather about drunk women, consider this finishing paragraph.
“If you’re reading this right now, it’s safe to assume you already have the morals that prevent you from becoming physically violent against a woman, but for the man who has been raised by lions, I hope this list helps him understand the self-harm of committing such a horrible act. As long as you don’t confuse violent rape with the legal act of sleeping with a promiscuous girl that’s as intoxicated as you, you should be okay.”

Crazy people think if something isn’t explicitly on the lawbooks, it’s okay. That it’s moral, in fact. That is their damage.

And as for Roosh’s personal blog, we all know he typed this gem with his own two hands.

rooshvrapistdrunk

Roosh: “During sex, all the power belongs to the male… She doesn’t care about equality, or protecting women from men like me; she just deeply resents the fact that sex is where men completely dominate.”
Other people have been quoting him too.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
In the UK at least, this is illegal.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/2015/07/21/roosh-explains-how-he-gets-always-unprotected-raw-sex-no-matter-if-she-insisted-for-condom/
This is rape. Consent is conditional, as I have explained before and cited the relevant statute. If a woman says ‘with a condom’, it isn’t a negotiation. There is no compromise. It’s either sex or rape.
“Roosh explains that he lies about his STDs, and that all the men should lie about their STDs or if they were ever tested, this way assuring that raw unprotected sex will happen.”
Also rape, and criminal charges like ABH may be placed (Actual Bodily Harm) for knowingly passing on a venereal disease.
Roosh: “I’ve had several girls insert my beautiful naked cock inside them while chanting “Get a condom !”
“Girls are supposedly the more intuitive of our species, but if so many feel right about fucking me without a condom, then I must conclude that they don’t know shit. They’re all dirty little whores who truly disgust me with their sex habits. I don’t care if she’s a lawyer, government worker, or environmentalist—if she lives in a metropolitan city and fucked you by the third date, she’s a bucket of disease”

Hey, he wanted us to go read his stuff, I’m obliging.

Do you think he’ll ever look in the mirror one day and hate himself? I don’t.

Reporter: [bad audio] (starting to doubt this transcript is honest)

Roosh: Because when I was in college I want to learn how to make love to every attractive girl that I saw. [whatever their wishes] So I needed to learn which skills that I had to do. Is there anyone that I have not called on yet because I’m trying to think of who is kind of quite. Why are you guys here then?

Reporter: Martha Stewart over there.

(Laughter)

Female Reporter: Um, are you happy?

(Laughter)

Roosh: That’s why we didn’t call on her. I mean happiness is what? Am I happy that people have the wrong impression of who I am? No! But am I happy that I’m probably going to cash in on this as long as I can survive the next couple days? Hey, you gave it to me, you gave me a package and now I will run with it. You can’t turn the clock back. [famous last words]

Reporter: How much have you made off of this in total?

Roosh: You know I have to get my accountant to really tally it. Has sales of books gone up? Yes. Has advertising sales gone up? Yes.

Reporter: What is your vision for the future for male-female relations?

Roosh: (laughs) Okay, well, what I’ve been trying to show on my website is that equality doesn’t work. I mean it doesn’t. If we have a divorce rate that is 50% or more, it doesn’t work. [most of those are 2nd, 3rd… divorces, many by men] I think we have to go back to the days where the man leads the household. [you don’t have a household, your opinion is invalid] I think that’s the only way. But are we in the US? I don’t think so. I think there’s a couple of countries left where we can, maybe in Eastern Europe. The Muslim countries… You guys love Islam so I’m thinking that you guys would love… You guys give it a pass. They have a patriarchal system in the household. Do you get on them for that? In an Islamic marriage, there are some Muslim guys here, rape cannot happen during a marriage. Do you write about that? No.

Reporter: Yes.

Roosh: No you don’t.

Reporter: Yeah we do. I’ll send you a bunch of links on that.

He keeps lying, it’s so sad.

Roosh: Please do, please do. And I’m going to read them carefully. But you guys give it a pass, you guys give Islam a pass for a patriarchal model that I write about but you come after me. Can we get something over here?

Female Reporter: She’s just my photographer.

Roosh: (Sighs)

Female Reporter: I am mostly here just to listen. Everyone else has mostly covered all the questions that I would’ve asked so.

Roosh: Ask anything.

Female Reporter: Why did you pick this hotel?

Roosh: I used to actually come here on dates. I used to bring dates here. This was back in 2000s. This was a place where I used to bring a date. We would sit on a couch upstairs and I would make my smooth moves on them here. This was 2005, 2006.

Reporter: Just to clarify something earlier, you were saying that Donald Trump was the closest. Besides the anti-PC stuff, what do you like about his 2016 campaign?

Roosh: He hates you guys too.

Reporter: Besides that.

Roosh: That’s enough for me. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Reporter: The media is not a political ideological position.

Roosh: Becoming anti-establishment is. You don’t understand, half you will be out of a job within five years time. [also, wow]

Post-collapse, bloggers will starve. You have no other skills. You’re a parasite
(I don’t monetize because of this, giving me time to do useful things, this is a hobby).

Reporter: So you like that he is nationalist and anti-establishment.

Roosh: And the reason is you’re not serving the needs of the public. You’re not. The establishment sites are losing views and I’m sure a lot of you have not seen your salaries increase in the way that you wanted. It’s because we don’t believe in the mainstream anymore. In this case, what you did to me is now showing the world what you guys do and how you operate.

They’ve been asking reasonable questions, douche.

Reporter: I didn’t do anything to you…

Female Reporter: Why did you end up canceling all the meetings? Because a lot of them weren’t going to be protested right?

Roosh: A lot of them were. I would say at least half of them. This news made it to Russia.

Female Reporter: [bad audio]

Roosh: Who said they’re not? You know, a mistake that I made was saying lets let these masculine, strong men organize, who hate the government, probably, and meet. That was kinda dumb. Because this could be a threat against us. So if we have to go underground, I’ll go underground. We never had a goal where we had to do everything in public.

Sounds like a terror cell.
Is he going to join Islamic State next? Full terrorist final form? He already praised their system where they kill, rape and starve little girls. They’d be dead by now without Western aid.

Reporter: If you and the people who follow your website closely are so strong, why do it in secret?

Roosh: Are you going to go to a meeting where the cops are on you?

As if the secret police are going to announce they’re secret police, goddamn.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

If MI5 doesn’t already have a UK agent on this under deep cover I’ll eat my hat. This cheeky Robin Hood number.
Isn’t he proud of his ideas? #chicken noise# Dare you to get a soapbox in London, it has plenty of Muslims.

Reporter: I have before. [this is a specimen Roosh is unacquainted with, a man with balls]

Roosh: I don’t like this guy. I mean he’s just being argumentative. #CHICKEN NOISE INTENSIFIES#

Female Reporter: Was there supposed to be a public component at all to these meetings?

Roosh: No, it was just the most efficient way to organize people who like me and who like my site. Hey guys, just meet here at this time.

Female Reporter: They were not planning on doing anything there. They were just going to hang out, right?

Roosh: No, okay, I’m going to tell you. There were going to meet at that point and say where’s the Pet Shop? It’s right here. Okay, hey cool, what your name? Where are you from? There’s a bar over here let’s go for a drink. That was it! That was it and then the worldwide anger came.

and discuss what? a bar is public so… if we recorded you, that would be alright?

Reporter: But again if they’re strong, masculine, brave, why the subterfuge? #slowclap#

Roosh: Because you have angered a mob that wants to disrupt their meeting because you have gotten governments against them by lying about their intention.

Why not prove them wrong by showing up and being peaceable? Unless you didn’t want to be peaceable. Rabbits are such cowards. Yes, run along. Run along. You were called out and exposed, you got burned.

Now the world thinks that they’re going to meet to rape people. So why are they going to meet now? Do you think it’s smart to go and meet now? After that? You would go to a meeting where everyone is targeting you as a potential person who is going to rape. That’s what you would do? Of course not! You don’t seem like the type that would stand up to someone who is coming against you. I mean, do you lift? You don’t lift.

What, I was kidding above, I didn’t think-

Reporter: No, I don’t.

Roosh: I do lift but I lost some weight.

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

laughing rdj crack up

I’m just saying, like, this guy is saying go into the fire. Who is going to do that?

A MAN.

A male with conviction and honour.

That’s absurd! This is where all these absurd ideas come from, from you guys. It doesn’t make any sense! It doesn’t make any sense. (sighs) So we got five more minutes.

Reporter: Do you feel that leaving town or having bodyguards takes away from your masculinity?

#wheezes#

#dying of laughter#

Roosh: No! If your life is in danger, no. [it isn’t, are SJWs a true physical threat or not?] If you want to stand up and fight and get into a confrontation, that’s fine, but right now the heat is on my mom and dad so me leaving is going to take the heat away. [no nobody threatened them] So I am considering them in the actions that I do. Last summer I had two speeches in Montréal and Toronto and the same anger came. What did I do? I stood there.

[You ran like a little bitch, turned and flipped them off from behind bodyguards and a closed door, it’s on camera. I saw the footage.]

Why? Because my family was not in danger. They didn’t post their address. For the record, I held the speeches even though the mayors came out against me but now it’s not worth a public happy hour to go against the police, governors, mayors, and all that stuff and put the safety and privacy of the men who follow me… I can’t toss them into that. [hey at least they won’t be raped] I can toss myself into that. [yeah] I can hire a bodyguard. [no, then you’re risking the bodyguard] I can go out right now and drink (which I will) but I’m not going to put them in danger. [If it came down a choice of Them or You, you would though, wouldn’t you? r-type scum, no loyalty] That would be like just looking out for me instead of the men who trust the things that I do.

I think he cancelled because HE didn’t wanna show up.

Female Reporter: How many men would you say those are?

Roosh: It’s hard to say, but based on the site traffic that I get for Return of Kings, I get one million uniques each month. Out of the hard-core people who really follow me it could be as high as 200,000.

Forum stats are much lower and more accurate. Lies.

Female Reporter: And how many of them were you expecting to go to these meetups around the world?

Roosh: There’s no way to know because it was just show up. Okay, so we got time for one more.

There’s no way to know because you **cancelled**.

Reporter: How many women have you been with?

Roosh: (sighs) A lot. I have been with a lot, but that’s not relevant to the current matter at hand. But thank you. Thank you all for coming. I expect more lies in your articles that are going to come up but I just wanted to do this to show what the truth is. Okay? So have a good night.

He counts notches (ew) but refuses to state a number?
Yeah, he’s lying, it’s much lower than people expect.
I heard a really good joke that he’s probably a virgin. I wish it was funny but I refuse to laugh at female pain.

Sorry, up top I assumed this would be brief but the Questions took up a lot of time and I had good material.

War and r/K

That’s the connection I see.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/nation-wimps/201510/the-mating-game-is-changing-and-you-wont-believe-how

A paucity of men would naturally recreate this condition post-war. The remaining men would be the fittest by Darwinian standards, connote status and unconsciously wish to repopulate. Yes, we called this the Baby Boom.

Women do not like sharing their resource, husband, as men do not like consolidating theirs (on one woman, if they are not in love). Men see women as a valuable resource when scarce (a society where most were married and time on the market ‘in society’ was short) but in modern times, most young people are on the shelf, and have advances from their elders to contend with too.

It won’t remain this way. Already I see this happening in real time.

As resources (economic) contract, women will find their voice and demand (marriage or nothing) what they wanted to ask to begin with. Women don’t want to date. It gets boring. Neither do men. Both want something else. What else do the men offer now? ‘Muh dick’ is going to be a sick reply, a base animal response, some women will no doubt become prostitutes to fill the demand when the economy tanks and continue to fund their lifestyle. This is the traditional way and it’s going to happen. Men are not entitled to sex (read: female fertility) but believe this because it’s been practically free for so long. They have forgotten its value and with it the value of women. Why grow up? Why be a real boy when they have all the ‘rights’ and none of the responsibilities? Women are not entitled to male resources either but many aren’t even being given the chance at marriage, and the divorce system can be understood as a form of social reparations from this. It encourages marital settling in women, because if it doesn’t work out with the manchild Mr Second Best, you get a cash bonus from his failure to be a fit husband and can try again, with a persuasive dowry.

The original fault lies with men. If they refuse to grow up and lead, the other issues usher forth.

Feminism has robbed women of the confidence to ask that ONE important question (you want to be a housewife???) and subsequently taken away many of the attributes a man would seek in a wife for good measure.

Further, at least some of what is being reported as rape stems from regret over drink-fueled encounters devoid of emotional connection.

Bingo. Alcohol makes people desperate. Women don’t want casual sex, feminism told them they did. It’s the man’s fault, men have the active role and refuse it (they won’t ‘man up’), then wonder why society is slowly collapsing around their ears. He deceives her, to get sex, then he wonders why she uses his lies against him in a trial.

I describe you, you hate me. Really, you hate yourself and everyone knows it.

Promises are verbal contracts, college students are mature enough to know this. Consent is based on verbal conditions, so promises become vitally important. The seduction laws will end up coming back in and that will be the end of PUA forever. Hallelujah.

A symptom of this manchild phenomena is that women have had to become more masculine to compensate, simply to survive in an atomized society alone. Certainly, there is a little more competition but it’s simply out in the open now. We’re told it’s empowering to be a bitch. Any man wishing to criticize women for doing what it takes to survive in a world without men is a male gamine, a manic pixie dream boy, yet to grow up.

They meet a guy, he calls every couple of months, they spend a night or two together each time, and then they’re miserable because they’re emotionally attached to him and want more from him—for which he might even call them “needy” or “greedy,” should they summon the courage to ask.

That level of entitled bullshit from men (love, affection, sex, cooking, company – the role of a wife, free) is going to fly straight out the window and clear into the Sun, never to be heard from again. She plays her poker chips too early and loses them. Women are beginning to see their fault and Millennials are beginning to reject feminism.

The imbalance is being corrected.

“Relationship preferences and sexual behavior of individuals are responsive to context,” Schacht says. “Men want fundamentally different things from relationships when males are rare than when they are abundant. The rare-male male is the stereotypical fling-seeking cad we expect him to be. However, the abundant-male male is the committed, devoted male from the age of Camelot.”

Patriarchy is coming back.

The manboys should be scared. A boy has a natural enemy – man.

p.s. This explains the entitled character of the stereotypical Baby Boomer.

p.p.s. The ‘alpha genes’ are the ones that get passed on in a Patriarchy. The genes of the titular Patriarch, the dad. Cads are scum in these societies, along with tarts, not fit to lick their work boots. The beta male in a Patriarchy is the man who cannot or will not become a responsible husband and father. Alpha genes build and reaffirm their own societal structure, they aren’t cucked out to the reckless hedons. Cad and tarts who cannot settle down (even settling with one another) will have an atrocious later life. Nobody will support them. There is no support network. Those who will not, for whatever reason, will not be given the opportunities by Patriarchs, created by Patriarchs, that should go to the other Patriarchs (this is why men only got hired in certain fields beyond requirement, because women weren’t Patriarchs either) in the hope of future reciprocal investment or family connection (by marriage). The old boy’s network has no room for bachelors. They cannot get on professionally, nor will any respectable family introduce them to their daughters. You’ve heard the idea of hiring a man preferentially because he had a family to support, right? The Patriarchs network at play. Just like voting rights being accorded by property ownership aka societal investment to support a family. Once rooted in a place for life, you’d better behave. It’s a check, it’s all a check. Pass or fail.

laughing rdj crack up

The ‘alpha female’ does exist, much to the hatred of cads because she shows them up. Feminists have tried to emulate this woman unsuccessfully. She is respected by these men, these Patriarchs, and allowed as an exception despite her sex because she fits the criteria and behaviour (character, honour, must support a family for practical reasons) and doesn’t cause trouble. She becomes a woman at home as a man ceases to be a professional upon leaving work, there is role flexibility, the family and its structure and support are important.  Alpha females are rare (the product of two alpha parents and their quality) but demonstrably exist. Weak men (virginTOW, many PUA) hate them the most for supplanting ‘their’ role they refuse to take up and further insult, out-competing them. They will imply they are promiscuous (in spite of contrary evidence) because they need to believe it would be possible for them to achieve it themselves (and reaffirm their ego) and so insult their lucky mate too (like saying he’s being cucked when he clearly isn’t and we live in a world of DNA testing). IF the barriers to entry aren’t one sex (m/f) like they mistakenly thought it was but the other sex (promiscuity/quality scale, r or K) their worldview collapses. They become ‘bad men’. They fail in life. It was entirely their choice, they cannot blame women for it. The music stops. Their reaction to this is a furious rush to Have it All (settle in the case of feminists and ‘players’) and convince themselves they’ve beat the system (sound familiar?). Predictably, they fail because people see them for what they are – desperate and faking it. They can’t stand happy monogamy. They hate it. Of course they can’t fake it. Of course no one in their right mind would take them after their ruin and shame. If they do manage to trick a poor sap (see the Simple decision game theory post), they will still cheat. If their spouse is Mr or Mrs Perfect they will cheat even more. They hate their spouse and they hate their marriage. They deserve divorce. The support network and opportunities dry up and they blame…. the system.

p.p.p.s. You know it’s bad when Roosh, of all people, suddenly wants to get married. He senses the window closing. He doesn’t get it – you can’t switch sides. You can’t change teams. As an adult, you choose by your actions and on those he will be judged. We don’t ask job applicants whether they think they should get it, we look at their CV. Self-respecting women will look at the way he’s treated women, the verbs he uses like bang as if we’re ketchup bottles and make up some excuse.

The supposed ‘Shit Test’ from a female perspective

I’m going to try and make this brief barring the legal (illegal) stuff. There was a very good rebuttal on the topic from an intelligent man.
The people who believe in this, they’re full of shit. They believe in it because it boosts their insecure ego. They want to believe it, or they’re the dickhead bothering random women who secretly hate them. You know, the objective stance of the antisocial interaction.

well doctor

Men over-call Shit Tests to mean practically anytime a woman talks to him, for his own ego.

what he says: “Did you see that? She was totally Shit-Testing me!
what he thinks it means: “Did you see that? The girl I had to approach was attracted to me, too!”
actual translation: Did you see that? I bothered a complete stranger in public because she has a pair of tits and it totally pissed her off!

A small legal detour

Even a “No, fuck off” in retort is seen as a Shit Test by these wankers, and they call you a bitch to boot (which has a predictable effect on what you think of them as a person). I don’t even like to swear at strangers and I have to do this most of the time because anything less, and they won’t leave me alone. They’re like an sperg who can’t tell you’re bored when your eyes glaze over, without the excuse of mental problems. They refuse to take the rejection for their ego and just leave, like it’s a hostage negotiation. Literally, with the questioning tactics (like ignoring answers you dislike) and physically stopping you from leaving, it might legally count as that. It’s like they’ve picked up flirting tips from Twilight and think persistence will always get the girl to change her mind.
The actual police aren’t even allowed to stop and search me for no reason, and you think it’s acceptable for you to not only stop me, but start with the sexual touching (that’s what kino is, sexual touching, legally speaking)? Good luck defending that in court. That’s the way to get kicked in the balls and totally deserve it under self-defense law. This kino stuff only applies to Americans in America I think, because I’ve seen blokes in Europe given police warnings for that unwarranted touching bullshit. I’ve also seen women get in trouble for it too, especially on hen nights. The street is not a club and even in clubs you can get kicked out – for being a creep. You can’t touch girls at strip clubs even, unless the girl offers, which is a whole different thing (not kino because she’s already interested and actively made an offer). When we call you entitled because you knowingly intrude on physical boundaries, we’re right. You can also get done on recent public order offenses as well as common assault (and they’ll have CCTV to prove you were intentionally doing this to God knows how many women):
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/public_order_offences/
and those can get you put in the drunk tank without being drunk! It can go on your record back home.
I’ve had men block alleys (England is full of alleys between little streets) practically threatening me for my name (to look up online) and number (oh sure, I wanted to date those guys, they wouldn’t exactly get worse as time went on and didn’t seem like woman-beaters at all….). Best part? All the crazy ones indulged in a wonderful bout of projection after I continued to reject them despite their menace by sulking off and calling me crazy! I checked around and this happens all the time with that type. This is why the No Means No campaign exists and men in the manosphere don’t get to complain about it, since we’re being honest, just like you wanted? You aren’t on the receiving end and needing to say No and be taken seriously for your own personal safety. These are the same creeps who say when a woman says No, she ‘doesn’t really mean it‘ but if a man says No to a girl he means it 100% of the time (lolwut legal equality) – the compulsive lying only applies to the female crazies I mention at the end, a strict minority, and the exact same men wonder why they’re deservedly up on rape charges later, where this is exactly how it will play out;

Judge: “Did she say No at any point?”
Rapist: “Yes but she didn’t mean it…”
Judge, thinking: WTF you raping bastard I have the consent law right here in a room behind me
Judge, speaking later“Guilty on this! *gavel* Guilty on that! *gavel* Guilty on everything I can use!” *gavel*

and they complain about women being deluded….
The rape law targets predatory men like this, who only want women for one thing (whether the woman wants it too), because a verbal word is supposed to be taken as truthful (like women are adults or something).
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/rape_and_sexual_offences/
When a woman says a thing, it’s equal to men, so legally, she means it 100%. It might fly on a forum as a joke but you will end up in prison if you believe it. Good technicality: if her word No means nothing to you, why do you seek a Yes?

Also under consent, is this;

Whether he or she was in a position to make that choice freely, and was not constrained in any way….

Stopping women in the street on CCTV will look dodgy to a jury. Like a predator.

Lack of consent may be demonstrated by;

Evidence that the complainant was deceived as to the identity of the person with whom (s)he had intercourse.

So PUAs are fucked in England, basically. One of many reasons I think Roosh hated London.

“It would plainly be open to a jury to hold that if AA had made clear that she would only consent to sexual intercourse if Mr Assange used a condom, then there would be no consent if, without her consent, he did not use a condom, or removed or tore the condom ….. His conduct in having sexual intercourse without a condom in circumstances where she had made clear she would only have sexual intercourse if he used a condom would therefore amount to an offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003….”

Really fucked, anywhere in the UK.

The same guy who’s now telling non-Americans to film all the sex they have, despite how European data and information law is so stringent post-hacking that the penalty can be life imprisonment, far longer than real rape, ironically:
feedproxy.google.com/~r/dcb/~3/72NuLvlxy8M/men-should-start-recording-sex-with-a-hidden-camera

I recommend that from this point on you strongly consider recording casual sexual encounters with a hidden camera.

Filming someone without their consent in Europe is a better way of ruining your life than a rape accusation. You can be up on literal terror charges. Especially when you say “Roosh said” in your legal defense, that won’t get you in the papers at all. It can actually change the regular consensual sex they have into rape – because they didn’t consent to that (all acts). Anything less than all acts? = Legal rape. It also comes under ‘conditional consent’ like the condom thing above. She didn’t agree to make porn, which is also a job and you didn’t pay her or get a model release either (things they have to do in actual porn). It’s illegal all the way down and makes me want to facepalm. When it comes back to bite them, they’ll blame feminists for their own stupid actions and ignorance of the law.
It rests on a stupid misunderstanding of the law involved. Nothing in the rape law says a woman can’t enjoy it, for a horrific fact that some poor, rare women have clinically orgasmed against their will while being raped, for the same reason as men can sustain an erection or ejaculate when being raped (motor function). I already covered in a post on day game just HOW illegal it is to film someone in public in London, so resting on that as legal defense regarding intimacy is abysmally stupid, but imagine how much worse it is when you have an entire library of blackmail material (how a judge will see it).
Posters won’t matter either. Nobody believes posters, unless they’re Government signs (the Keep Calm… joke was based on this). If you think that will help instead of make you look like you had intention to film her and use it –I describe you, you hate me. Really, you hate yourself and everyone knows it.

Final word on how backward this is;

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jun/10/34-year-old-man-first-person-to-be-convicted-under-forced-marriage-laws

This is who you’d get lumped in with. It hinges on use of a hidden camera. It’s treated like filming someone in a public toilet – still illegal, still creepy, still getting you in the papers and ruining your life.

Back off the legal track, which needed saying

No actually means Fuck Off from a woman in a polite society. We have a culture of understatement. We couldn’t put that on the big red buses.

The way we think about it is like this: when you meet a stranger, you’re at your best. If that’s the best impression you can make, we’ll pass, even if you had the looks to scrape past. It’s like that average-looking girl with a major attitude problem who’s just too much hassle, and when all the local blokes have had a go, she complains why she doesn’t have a boyfriend. You’re the male version of that (she talked to me but she didn’t ___).

It’s irritating. Attractive women get approached all the time, and we all know it’s based on looks because you know approximately fuck-all about us except looks, so we also know you’re shallow and insinuating you think we might be a whore down for instant sex because you tried it on in the first place (or else why bother). That’s part of the reason for the supposed Bitch Shield, this selective shield that isn’t supposed to apply to a single entitled man, you’re supposed to worship for *gasp!* talking to you, omg thank you! but is supposed to apply to the 99 guys before him that he never saw or met. At least some of whom were better-looking and not entitled, a winning combination in either sex.

I hope this tosser lives long enough to die in a riot without a pension

This is about 1000x worse in a polite society, like England. Where Americans think it’s okay to just walk up to you and tell you their name and life story, because you happen to be in the same place as them at the same time. You have no right to my time as I have no right to yours. Anything less is entitled. I can walk away without a word or flip you the bird going ‘ew no’ and it doesn’t make me a bitch because you started it. If you think it’s just the women and there’s something wrong with us, try doing the exact same thing to the average Englishman and you’ll have a funny A&E story.

You know that age when kids learn a word and they babble it endlessly for months? That’s a guy who just read about Shit Tests. It’s apophenia, the human tendency to upgrade attention to a thing and seek patterns where in reality, there are none. Jesus isn’t in your toast.

You’re being treated like an arsehole, because you’re acting like one. Accost random men on the street in suits (male equiv. to a short skirt) and see if the treatment is ‘bitch’-based.

What we say: “Excuse me?”
What we mean: “Why is this creep talking to me?”

Attraction is not a negotiation. Yet Game purports to teach men how to change a woman’s mind.

Reminds me of this joke;

If her bra and underwear match when you take her clothes off, you’re not the one who decided to have sex.

The one who can say stop has the control. The one who cares less. Men should know women care less about sex in general.

If you walk up to me and start talking, I’m not throwing you a Shit Test in reply. I’m trying to make you go away because I’m not interested. You already knew this, because you had to walk up to me. I have legs. I could’ve asked you for the time (classic English opener) if I wanted to talk to you. In a polite society, the women are the ones with the opener power, never the men (to avoid this very problem since we chucked chaperons) so you’re in my country, you didn’t bother to learn the local rules or worst still, you don’t even care, and you’ve intruded on the transport time we base our schedules on to insult me as a person (see above, in thinking I might be a whore).

You’re a prick. A woman may never say it to your face, but we’ll be telling our next appointment: “Sorry I was late, some prick started talking to me right there in the street!” To which most people, including a lot of men will reply: “What a creep.” Because we know the rules. Your personal opinions of harassment won’t change our culture.

white male opinions do the creep

When you act like a creep, you ARE a creep.
Making up terms to make your public harassment look like Playing Hard to Get doesn’t change the external appearance to everyone else. Or the police.

This is a major issue between applying American game like it works the same anywhere else. The American culture doesn’t cross over, mostly because America doesn’t have one. The republican war saw to that. There are major class issues I won’t go into, the UK is the most class-ridden place in the world, so some American lumpenprole approaching a decent girl (working class honest to middle class pampered to upper class totty) is seen as loathsome, like a peasant asking a member of the Royal Family to hold their drink. No, we are not equal, and you’re foreign, we don’t even like the French. The cold response is not the fault of the person being approached nor confined to women. The men can actually be worse for this, the women might try and be polite at first and dummies often take this to be an IOI, get worse, and finally she has to drop the pretense at politeness.

If you’re standing around like these day game pricks looking for women to approach, guess what: we can see you, too. Usually about halfway down the road, often rubbing their hands because it’s so bloody cold, which can be quite funny given why they’re there. When everyone else is moving and one shifty looking bloke is eyeing up all the young women, it doesn’t take a genius to know what type of bloke he is and we will try to avoid you like one of those leaflet or survey people. If we’re zoned out and you still bother us, you don’t get to complain about an abrupt answer or fake number, because when you begin an interaction, you’ve already become the rude party. Whatever we say after is perfectly acceptable on etiquette grounds, like matching insults in an argument. I don’t think I can overstate what a social violation this totally public approach is, and considering these guys go on about rapport, I should say this makes the average non-American girl very uncomfortable. This is why recent iterations have told men to have some kind of excuse, because it gets a girl talking, sure, but that doesn’t change the binary fact of whether or not she is interested. You’ll have the exact same success rate, but it will seem like it was working and you ‘lost it’ – when you never had it. 

You are not exempt from call time. Pay attention.

Overall, it makes the girls more averse to tourists. Especially Asian tourists (the core demo of PUA is Asian men with White Fever). Ofc, the complaint racism comes in like the whiny bitches they are, which makes them more attractive /sarc, when it’s actually the men who are racist, by only wanting white women (get your own), intruding on our country like it’s a brothel and assuming we’re all whores (if that were true, porn wouldn’t exist).

Now, some men will rightly say: but there are women who play games. Total headcases.

Yes, there are.

With one tell —

But those are the same women who approach you.

To establish control. And because the etiquette allows them to.

If a woman is trying to let you know she isn’t interested (backing off, I’m busy, no thanks, excuses, the what? face), you can’t complain about the headcases who play games and bemoan “where are the honest women”?

Rejection is good, it stops everyone from wasting their time. Take the hint and GTFO.

And if you’re only attracted to the women who play games (as many in PUA are), it’s no wonder your opinion of women in general is so low. You only want the crazies.

And if Shit Tests ever did exist, they are used by men (you might know it as provoking a hamstering) – and are also applied to other men (see: banter) for fun.