A note on growth

The growth of the 19th century was possible because of machines.
The growth of the 20th century was possible thanks to child enslavement (mostly in the Third World). Yes, we went backwards. To this day, most spices, fabrics and other staples are made by slaves. Children make ideal slaves because they have no rights and nobody listens in the legal system, free time and no breeding obligations and they are easy to threaten and punish if they make mistakes. Foreign aid is really about encouraging the breeding of future slaves. If they couldn’t enslave these people, they wouldn’t be interested. It’s a perfect working caste – no power, can’t riot. If you really want to help the Third World, end child labour.
Yes, you’ll pay more for a t-shirt.
However, they won’t be so poor moving to our country is attractive. It’s a win-win.

However, the feminists need someone to make their t-shirts.

So you won’t hear this from them.

More blame for Hillary


I guess it’s better to blame the figurehead?

I guess intersectionality is coming to the Left. As if they could be any less relevant.

Typical dense SJW tactics to double down on something that doesn’t work.
Pandering to increasingly niche groups of people to be edgy, doesn’t win you elections.

Conservative political savant Karl Rove said this week on Fox News that focus groups conducted with working-class women showed that they didn’t care that Clinton would be the first woman president. And compared to Obama in 2008, Clinton won fewer votes from women, whether they were black, Latina or white.

Oh now you listen to Fox.

Mentioning race obscures the classism.

Her tone-deaf campaign didn’t even pretend to transcend such class divisions. Once she had secured the nomination, Clinton offered few ideas about how to make ordinary women’s lives better.

Guess which one is actionable?

The campaign endlessly touted endorsements from the ranks of the celebrity one-percenters, especially women. In the end, Clinton enjoyed a gender advantage only among the college-educated.Among white women without college degrees, Clinton lost to Trump by 28 points. It was almost as if waitresses in Ohio didn’t care that Anna Wintour was #WithHer.

The elite feminism Clinton represents is also a white feminism.

Wait, do you really expect every Democrat candidate after Obama to be black? And what about the Hispanics? The Muslims? I thought the Democrats sold that they were capable of sympathy?

She was more interested in trying to attract white suburban, Republican women. In the end, African American turnout was lower than in 2012.

You felt taken for granted? Welcome to the world of white people.
This election cycle, across the world, the left lost the working class whites.
Blaming the blacks for exerting agency, what a shocker. Why do they expect Democrat support? They aren’t the blue version of Uncle Toms.

Feminist writer Jill Filipovic went much further in her disgust for the masses, tweeting about Clinton, “Sorry, America, you didn’t deserve her.”

They agreed.
They still don’t mention the scandals.

As well, if white male solidarity with a misogynist and racist – or, for that matter, any special feelings about Trump – was a huge factor, he should have invigorated the base. Yet there was no surge in Republican voters –Trump got fewer votes than Romney in 2012.

My God it can read.

It was dumb of America to elect him.

See I may be condescending, but I insult individuals, not entire countries.
Why did Democrats lose again?
I bet they don’t know voting is correlated as a civic duty to high IQ populations who feel responsible.

Feminism now has an opportunity to move beyond the go-girlism of the Sheryl Sandberg set.

The nice PR stuff. What’s left? More Dear White People?

But we can’t do it with leaders who would rather hobnob with billionaires than fight for ordinary women. A feminism that revels in its identification with people like Clinton – forming groups with names like Pantsuit Nation – is not a feminism that values the lives of most women.

Turn on the people with power?
These are not smart women.


Rosa Luxemburg, cultural marxist?

I’m not saying she was, but based on biography…


could predate the school. In some ways she sounds quite nice. I guess you can never know what someone’s endgame really is.

Her features were sharp and pronouncedly Jewish.

The subjects of discussion had one theme — revolution, whether it be philosophy, Darwinism, the emancipation of women, Marx, Tolstoy, Russian agrarian communism, capitalistic development, Nihilist terrorism, Bakunin, Blanqy, methods of revolutionary struggle, demoralization of the Western bourgeoisie, Bismark’s fall, German social democracy, the emancipation of Poland, Emile Zola.. Luxemburg positioned herself in the thick of political battles, invariably advocating Marxism.

Max Beer, who traced the history of the movement in “Fifty Years of International Socialism,” said about Luxemburg, who he called the Jewess:

Hey, they’re making a big deal of it, not me.

Her wide learning, intellectual and artistic culture, her eloquence and sparkling wit, made her one of the great figures of the Socialist International. She won the admiration of men [persons] of action, like James and Lenin, and of artists such as Hugo Wolf.. Her method of dialect was strongly influenced by Marx. She regarded history as a process. In the process class-forces struggled for their own interests as they evolved out of a given economic situation.. For Luxemburg,

Charisma gets you far.

She seems to have been in it for her own amusement.
Encouraging women to leave their husbands is a bit far though.

Video: Feminists rentseek in Technology and encourage fake geek girls to get into a career they’ll hate

This is what I’m up against. Heavens above…

Who do they think they are?

Women coded the first computers and various satellites and rockets, before most of them were even born.

We don’t need you.

Who are you?

They actually make women in Technology look bad. All women in STEM, but Technology has a lot of excess VC money floating around in this bubble so they focus on that, like good little leeches. It makes any honest, quiet worker in Tech look like One of Them. Like we have had to be coerced into it and we’re scared, dumb and weak and need other women to hold our hand and make the nasty men respect us. Pass the bucket?

Any career is daunting, how old are you?

Nope, the only people ‘scared’ of Tech are the dimwits who go on and on about STEM (trying to convince someone to pay them to complain) when they can barely pass Calc 1.

ugh why no please stop god kill me now rdj tony stark

STFU. Some of us are working here.

To use a crass expression, shit or get off the pot. Do the work, but don’t complain about what other people are doing when you’re that one guy that doesn’t pull his weight and carry his fair share. We don’t need middle managers, that’s why techies earn decent wages, there’s less parasitism from talentless hacks and more pay-per-results. The tone of this, the fake saccharine sweetness of the Mean Girls, ‘Let us help you!’, is pathetic schoolgirl-level manipulation. Instead of going into the data, factsheets and perhaps case studies – the technical stuff, the relevant, objective stuff, they bellyache about their feefees. Guess what? No one cares, just like the men and no one is going to baby you as an adult in any line of work. They’ll fire you and you’ll bloody deserve it for dragging the rest of us down.

that's enough stop please karen will and grace

Don’t bully anyone into any career. Anyone, male, female, both, purple, blue, brown. The people doing this, pushing for politics refuse to go into it themselves, what does that say? Either they can’t, in which case their opinion is worthless, or they won’t, in which case you’re a sucker. Gloryhounds don’t last long anyway. They’re unpopular and mocked for pompous incompetence. If you have to be persuaded into going for it, it’s wrong – for you. It isn’t a brave thing, it’s just another job, unlike, say, the Marines. Go join the Marines if you want to make a ‘courageous’ statement with your occupation. Now we seem to have all the fake geek girls with their ‘#suchanerd’ selfies suddenly claiming to be IN Tech without actually, you know – BEING in Tech.

I may appear smug, in fact that's just the sound of maths rushing through my mind

I don’t have a gif that can adequately express my disdain at that.
Here’s the handsome visage of Michael Fassbender instead.

If you bring up any political points during a professional discussion, it is not a professional discussion, but political showboating. We don’t want to hear it. The best places will kick you out for disrupting the culture. No politics at work, idiots. No sex either. Although, with most people in Tech that never arises as an issue.

As for confusing Ad/Marketing and Fundraisers (charity workers) with people IN Technology, a forprofit cut-throat industry, that’s not even wrong.

All non-profit is the same, all for-profit is specialized. What have you done that has specifically moved Technology forward, that you couldn’t have done in any other sector? Oh, no? You’ve done Sweet FA? Then sweetie, you are not in Tech.

Ah. Can you hear Orwell laughing?

The virtue signalling is sickening. When the third along said “As a white woman…” I wanted to hurl. That has nothing to do with it. Really, if somebody makes your race (or sex) a thing you shrug it off because they lose out on your talent. They’ll literally pay in lost earnings. It’s high risk, high reward. Bring it or go while you have some dignity left. If you can’t work in a team, you can’t work in this industry, baby. If you must insist on pointing out why you’re different and a Special Snowflake, you won’t be ‘boss’ and you certainly won’t be respected, it’s a major point against. Divas belong in showbiz. You are not judged as an individual but by the quality of the work you do, in about 95% of situations. If you did happen across a dinosaur, you move on knowing they’ll die soon and their bigoted opinions of female potential with them. Rarely, some men do get threatened. The younger people call them all pussies, they’re isolated in general. Honestly, who’s threatened by a young woman? That’s silly. They’re losing out on intelligent people who do good work …on the basis of chromosomes. Duh!

Formally, the worst aspect of this manipulation is the fallout on the below-grade women who get played. These people won’t be paying their debts. These people will blame all their lack of progress on all men. They’ll be taking up valuable places on courses they didn’t really earn as diversity quotas, and garner less respect for it, and finally, in the job market, they’ll be blown out of the water by those with talent and aptitude to work hard and have to retrain. Again. I’ve seen it all before. It’s despicable to push people into a career, I don’t care if you’re their priest or parent and nobody has the right to be so damn controlling. What nutbars.

There is a grand irony in this.

In ‘pushing’ aka bullying men like this and encouraging women to back one another whatever their claims and regardless of evidence, they’ll never improve those numbers. Because who has to concede that ground? Oh right, the men you’re alienating. It’s a business, sweetheart. If you threaten them, you lose.

This isn’t a war, this is capitalism.

As for the point about other women being misogynistic, to try and guilt trip us into going along with their crusading, I can’t roll my eyes far back enough into my skull.

“This is a complex area”? No. It isn’t. You’re full of shit.

“We need to face it.” Who is We? You don’t speak for me. That’s more patronizing than any man has ever been to me. Claiming this blase, like all women all have the exact same opinions, like a Feminist Hivemind?

What do you mean we, paleface?

You can tell they don’t really do ‘profits’ when they call competition ‘silly’. Ugh.
Why should I put down my advantage for you? Hm? How is that ‘fair’? That isn’t fair, but it is equal, and those are polar opposites. Why should women with power feel obligated to mentor, and mentor other women? That’s the very definition of sexism, since it’s purely ‘on the basis of’ one’s sex in both occasions. There is no obligation. If a mentorship role is not chosen, it will be harmful, much like a therapist. You don’t ‘let them’ do anything, those who deserve the positions will earn them.

“We definitely need to do it.” I didn’t get lectured this much in academia.

I hope this tosser lives long enough to die in a riot without a pension

Hell, I wasn’t this tough giving a lecture.

Why do I need to do it? To make you feel better? Sorry if I refuse to organize my entire life around your menstrual cycle’s emotional needs masquerading as realpolitik. I thought we were professionals here.

Get over yourself and learn something or GTFO loser

However, there are fundraising issues. Blind applications would resolve this, like music auditions behind a screen but pitching culture is face-to-face. do they mention this? No. Because they haven’t the slightest clue what they’re talking about. No woman really in Tech would do a panel like this, willing, because they wouldn’t want to be confused with This Lot, who aren’t even all female (male SJWs), so they’re bloody hypocrites banging on about Sisterhood. I can’t watch past five minutes, sorry. Roosh’s rape fantasies I can handle but this is too close to home.

Littlefinger would own you at Rock Paper Scissors

Instead I looked up their bios and put what they actually do in bold. For lolz.

Women Shift Digital http://www.womenshiftdigital.com/about/

“As a female led interdisciplinary design collective, body>data>space and its Creative Director, Ghislaine Boddington are recognised as international long term figures involved in the women in technology debates and networks, promoting and supporting the work of many female artists and researchers.

Since the early 90’s members of the body<data<space team have demonstrated passion and expertise in mentoring young women and girls through the delivery of  learning experiences.

…Nothing practical.

HelpingB https://helpingb.co/

“HelpingB is an award-winning crowdfunding platform for businesses that are:

    Revolutionary, innovative and ground-breaking [DS: here are some impressive words]

    Financially sustainable [well yeah]

    Socially, environmentally and/or economically conscious” [charity work]

SJW-specialized funding. And what’s the average annual profit of these ‘businesses’? I don’t know, because they don’t tell us.

£55,000+ raised

I could raise more at a bake sale.

250+ lives changed

Wait… is that it?
Sounds a little pricey for so little impact, where’s it going? Let’s see the first project to catch my eye…

Children’s Colour Changing Bath Book

~sigh~ I don’t know what I expected. They aren’t even charity status, I wonder how much bank the top people are making.

HelpingB is a for-purpose organisation dedicated to providing social entrepreneurs with a platform to bring their ideas to life.”

So they were purely hired because they were born women. Sounds fair.

“There is nothing wrong with profit, it’s what you do with it that matters.”

translation: ‘You don’t have to feel guilty about earning money, but you have to give it away. You don’t have to give it away to someone who didn’t do the work …but give it to charity cases we like. Oh, we won’t give them anything, we aren’t a charity.’

Sounds like a really bitchy aunt.

Why does the manosphere think it has the moral high ground?

It doesn’t. At all. In fact, it’s actually worse than feminism in some respects because they know full well how wrong what they encourage and do really is, they see the damage to society and keep doing it because other people are (begging if they jumped off a cliff…). They seem to be dallying with the Alt Right since this EU crisis (whatever) and some dipping their toe into Neoreaction (fine) ideas and acting shocked and pearl-clutching like the worst SJWs when these traditional people reject them. Like, actually traditional, as in living it. Or in politer circles, when they ignore them, hoping they’ll go away.

They don’t get it.
They don’t have the moral high ground.

I have a mixed readership so allow me to explain a bit.

Off the top of my head, like Feminist vs. PUA … let’s consider the so-called ‘degenerate’ behaviours they verbally lambaste when (feminist) women do it while hypocritically enacting them or endorsing them in their common conversations with others who are/will do them aka incitement. (Looks misogynist to an outsider because it is, in some cases, like how dare a single woman support herself with a job – when the alternative is welfare).
I’ve gone for the practical, somewhat PC term destructive because it’s easier to agree upon.


None of those people with the spare time to push these Zeitgeist online have a real job or an actual life. Their Apocalypse Value is zero. They deserve zero respect. AKA r-types gonna r.

And they wonder why the traditional people are giving them the side-eye.


She sLAYS them

It comes from a puerile understanding of masculinity, including the laughable attempt to ape Neoreaction’s success with ‘Neomasculinity’, where r-types pretend to reform and play both sides (I guess you could say, game both sides) by talking about K-ideas, what an effort... and bitch “Why won’t women (who aren’t married to me and owe me nothing) submit to me?” when they’ve done literally nothing to prepare for that role and on the contrary, much to disqualify them from the MMP.
As if anyone in their Right mind (pun wholly intended) is going to take pointers on how to be a man from Roosh. Do you want his life? Is it aspirational for traditionalists up until now? What’s your gut telling you? A person’s past and choices can’t lie for them.

Their troubles seem to come from a very convenient excuse to avoid maturity.

Men aren’t exempt from prosocial behaviour, far from it, they’re supposed to be more virtuous to lead women and establish societal standards.

p.s. I see the spelling error and I don’t care.

Video: Re hashtag #ThingsFeministMenHaveSaidToMe

I loved this hashtag. I even contributed toward it. I’m actually disappointed she didn’t do a whole 15 minute video reading those out, all of them were pure gold.

They're so stupid it's a laughriot
I loved this video. Unexpectedly. It popped into my recc. box.

There’s a scarily large amount of “Male Feminists” that are actually misogynists in disguise.

She’s 100% correct. I’m not beyond admitting that. We have that shared experience. They are massive hypocrites. They use the label “Male Feminist” like Captain America uses his shield.

Metaphor reconstruction;

I checked with 4chan for black ops, it isn’t one of theirs. This hashtag is real.

Think about it this way: if you were a misogynist, where is the place you would go to avoid the truthful accusation?

…..yeah. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masked_man_fallacy

The issue for women being the Catch 22;

  1. Say you’re a feminist. Now they own you.
  2. Say you aren’t. Either they say you are anyway (If female, feminist)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic) or you’re an evil woman.