A note on growth

The growth of the 19th century was possible because of machines.
The growth of the 20th century was possible thanks to child enslavement (mostly in the Third World). Yes, we went backwards. To this day, most spices, fabrics and other staples are made by slaves. Children make ideal slaves because they have no rights and nobody listens in the legal system, free time and no breeding obligations and they are easy to threaten and punish if they make mistakes. Foreign aid is really about encouraging the breeding of future slaves. If they couldn’t enslave these people, they wouldn’t be interested. It’s a perfect working caste – no power, can’t riot. If you really want to help the Third World, end child labour.
Yes, you’ll pay more for a t-shirt.
However, they won’t be so poor moving to our country is attractive. It’s a win-win.

However, the feminists need someone to make their t-shirts.

So you won’t hear this from them.

Was mass immigration a conspiracy?


Why did Labour lose the last two elections? Not just the one after Rotherham?


The strongest evidence for conspiracy comes from one of Labour’s own. Andrew Neather, a previously unheard-of speechwriter for Blair, Straw and Blunkett, popped up with an article in the Evening Standard in October 2009 which gave the game away.

Immigration, he wrote, ‘didn’t just happen; the  deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’.

That’s beyond gerrymandering into outright voter fraud.

He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

Instead it’s proven Enoch correct.

Multiculturalism has failed.
Swedish feminists are moving out of No-go zones full of Muslims they voted to welcome.

That seemed, even to him, a manoeuvre too far.

Tony Blair removed the death penalty for treason……

look it up…….

The result is now plain for all to see. Even Blair’s favourite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), commented recently: ‘It is no exaggeration to say that immigration under New Labour has changed the face of the country.’


easily taken back

they leave as soon the economy properly tanks

or they’re drafted into a war

whichever comes first

the interesting part will be going after what they owe this country, once they’ve left

never piss off the white people, it’s world war or nothing

yet they treat us like simpering ninnies

like the colonies thing was a coincidence

It is not hard to see why Labour’s own apparatchiks supported the policy. Provided that the white working class didn’t cotton on, there were votes in it.

Now they’ve lost the WWC.
The response?

Not to earn the core voter base back.

But to continue betraying them by importing rapists for their daughters.

The WWC is proud, in a word. They do not forget grudges over generations.
WWC votes are often the Kingmaker in FPTP. That’s why Labour backed altering it.

Research into voting patterns conducted for the Electoral Commission after the 2005 general election found that 80 per cent of Caribbean and African voters had voted Labour, while only about 3 per cent had voted Conservative and roughly 8 per cent for the Liberal Democrats.

The Asian vote was split about 50 per cent for Labour, 10 per cent Conservatives  and 15 per cent Liberal Democrats.

That meets all the criteria for treason.

Giving people citizenship on the probable basis of how they’ll vote.

The hypocrisy of Yellow Fever

I think this is pol.


inb4 Muh SE Asian IQ!
Mostly nurture, mostly maths education, a select few types of Asian only. Really it’s like the Chinese studying the genetics of IQ, they’re selecting for autism (the men probably already have to think mating strategy should be based on a grade, it’s a school grade writ large and ASIANS CHEAT*). Due to their caste system, a white man will never be able to marry those quality ones. They lock you out too. If you have to play a new sport, you were a failure at the old one.

Same guys who carp on about feminists being fat, while holding at least three whole stone on their stomach.**
They do this on video. They know we can see them. I think I know why you can only attract those ‘feminazis’ dude… leagues exist, but they don’t know they’re being ripped off (less than their value in their head) in a foreign culture’s league. They can’t distinguish the faces and the class structures well enough. Boy, are they in for a shock.

Epigenetics is more important than genetics when it comes to weight. Your kids will be fat, if you’ve been fat prior to conceiving them. Marrying a woman with the body of a little girl*** (slag off Scarlett Johansson all you want for Ghost in the Shell, you will never, ever find an Asian woman with that voluptuous, womanly hourglass figure, they do not exist without surgery) won’t change your own doritos and diet cola DNA. Since you probably definitely like anime and that’s their culture or at least Asian, they’ll get heavily into it as well. Good luck selling them on identity politics when they don’t have an identity as ‘mixed’. Oh, they might become SJWs when frustrated by their dating life, lucky you. Have fun trying not to raise the next embittered, angry at all white blonde women Elliot Rodger. And he wasn’t even ugly. Still a social failure, and he was rich and thin. Welcome to the real world, Neo. These are facts.

If she is using you for your sperm/house, and she divorces you, good luck expecting any mercy from a furious dragon, one raised to think of you as the asshole that bombed/attacked her people (Oriental revenge is like Muslim, it travels down for centuries). The most callous white woman has more sympathy than an Asian woman in divorce court, I’ll be willing to bet most of those Terrible Divorce stories, that you read about in sad text posts, if you looked at the picture, it’d be an Asian woman. We all know about green card ones. They never post pictures of the ex-wife, do they? They know the reader will assume it was a white woman, you have to explicitly ask and they’re hesitant to admit it because I told you so is the rational response.  You can’t leave your league … or it will leave you.

Speaking of traditional, they do know Asian cultures are matriarchal, right? White women are the least conniving (proof below, at least physical deception) of all the races, as I’ve explained before. The Asian girls fake femininity**** itself (and even pupil size, how is that not worse than cheating with fake tan?) and have you seen what you’ve got waiting for you in middle age, what an aged Asian looks like? You don’t buy the calf, you buy the cow.

Conniving. They don’t even need to be female. Cheek swab for a chromosome test on a first date?

Look at it. Study this until it’s burned in your brain the next time the media tries to push Asian women as more European (in beauty) – than Europeans.
Suuuuuure, man. O.K.
I guess that’s why they get so much surgery on their eyes. Because they don’t hate themselves or wanna trick anyone.

What you want to marry, guys. Even Asian men wished they looked like that, that’s why they draw them.
Google ‘Asian girl makeup transformation’ and browse a few hours, it’s cleansing.

They don’t know the culture, they don’t know any of this.
What do they know? Anime.


She won’t be a schoolgirl forever. She’ll be a worse tiger mom than any LA white bitch, and she won’t even be hot. At least black women mellow out with age, those guys are forward planners. Have you seen a chill Asian woman over 35? Have you seen one that didn’t turn into a raisin at menopause? When they ‘travel’ to these countries, they only look at the prime, early peak (spoiled) ages, 15-25. They don’t look at the older women, men have a known blindness to this. Joke’s on them, aside from having children with psychiatric issues because their parents hate themselves (I’ve linked to those heartbreaking stories before), who won’t be able to date/mate with anyone other than other Mixed Race (that means black, your grandkids will probably be black), they’ll be stuck with a woman from a foreign culture they didn’t take one month to learn about and observe, who’ll dominate him so hard that he begs for death.

I encourage them, once they’ve left the white gene pool, to stay out.

I heard it once from a very blunt Chinese man “once you go rice hat, they don’t want you back.”
By all means, show off your Asian waifu. Please, warn us in advance to avoid you.

Worst of all, those kids will be UGLY. Have you seen those kids? This isn’t even a race thing, they just look like their parents. It’s just that their parents were ugly so the children look deformed. Like you warped their face in photoshop. Look it up, look around at a heavy traffic area, you’ll see it. You think they’ll reproduce, really?

*Yes that applies to sexual cheating, once her Asian duty is done by giving birth and she doesn’t need your dick anymore (Asian husbands are severely under-sexed, explaining the creepy porn, they’re obligated to produce children, not to screw). But if they’re so smart, why is cheating epidemic in Asia just to match European Uni standards…? Riddle me that, motherfucker. Indian girls are the smart Asians, but I have a feeling they’d be disgusted at the idea of marrying one (they prefer the also fake hairless look for some porn strange porn reason). Confuse sexual beauty for childlike and pervert Darwin to do it. Object when you call this creepy. Not an insult, a description.

**Have you noticed the bitchiest commentators slagging off short hair (hello Hepburn) as ugly, are themselves ugly, constantly sweating on the face (bad diet) and very, very bald?

***The irony being that the feminists are in a better genetic position, since playing the racial roulette is a high risk strategy for attractive children, you get very stacked odds against. A very masculine woman and a very feminine man can have highly attractive children, unlike the kid with some name after an anime character whose eyes look like that super-high cat look the drag queens do. You have to see it, to see what I mean but it’s uncanny valley, like a half-Asian Cumberbatch but more alien. The slightest bit of fat on their face, and it’s even worse, the eye narrowing is plain weird to watch with Western double lids.

**** They have to be really girly, or their little girl looks would seem incongruent and creepy to you. It’s an act and it disappears once she gets what she wanted (usually a ring on it). Watch the way her mother chides her father in a quiet moment for breathing, it’s worse than any Shakespearean shrew, that’s waiting for you.

They deserve all they get. They didn’t listen, let them learn.
go on moss popcorn

I’ll peace out with two images for the It’s Not So Bad crowd.

My personal favourite.

Continue to look down on ‘white trash’.

Feminists want to ban sex robots because ofc they do

I thought they didn’t need a man? Why can’t they just get a male, sorry, male-presenting one?

Feminists want to ban sex robots ‘because they’re like prostitutes’

The type of bloke who prefers silicone wouldn’t be acceptable dating material, I say let them have it. Keeps them away from bothering us in public. This is r-type male removal from the SMP.

They have serious double standards on this – exploring sexuality good, empowering choice to sell sexuality bad. Well then it isn’t good, is it?

anyway moving on awkward 10 doctor what wut wtf

They’ll never be advanced enough to compete with real women so it hardly matters.

Video: Dear feminists

Behold, a female troll.

We have no idea whose side she is on.

Watch the refugees video if you don’t believe me.

Equal opportunity is common sense. Welcome to the 21st century.
You can compete professionally without letting it interfere with your personal life.

Equal outcomes is ….social justice.

“Shut the fuck up and go and start your own business.”

Okay I like her.

“You hate Barbie because she’s pretty.”

Barbie has been an astronaut, wtf have they done?

“You’re jealous of a doll.”


“Barbie is my soulmate.”

Okay, I have a crush.

“And Ken is her accessory.”

…She might be a genius on the DL.

Video: Why are feminists fat and ugly?

Marry me.


Marry me.

There is something deeply attractive about seeing him simply tell the truth.

But it’s like a meth gang, once you fall in with these people as friends, they cause you to become like them. Social contagion is a key element. Mental illness gets more severe, for example.

Bitter old women in HR ruin hot females’ career chances too


Between the lines but it’s there.

Again, the people who were most attractive were rated lowly by people of the same sex. The effect was especially strong for women, who “selected highly attractive female candidates only 11.7% of the time, significantly less than chance,” Agthe and her colleagues write.

Spite is stronger in women and girlish boys.

Indeed, these may be examples of what University of Ottawa psychologist Tracy Vaillancourt calls “indirect aggression,” which she wrote about in a 2013 paper provocatively titled “Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?” 

Women are actually more aggressive than men. Even as children.
It’s just they’re sneakier and get away with it more often, being harder to prove.
Next time a feminist says it’s okay for boys to cry (no it isn’t), realise she is asking boys to play by the rules of her game because she cannot win at his.

“A clear way that indirect aggression serves an individual’s goal is by reducing her same-sex rivals’ ability, or desire, to compete for mates,” she wrote. “This is typically accomplished in a concealed way, which diminishes the risk of a counterattack.”

Mean Girls grow old and get meaner.
Notice the Go Grrrl rhetoric for women in say, STEM, is based on male action? What about plain women being nice to the hot girl? No no, that’s too much to ask of the Sisterhood apparently. The hot girl is presumed to have “too much” already. Sisterhood approval is inversely proportionate to the attention you glean from men without trying. (n.b. Sisterhood spinsters hate me, which I take to be a compliment in light of the reasons). Funnily enough, their chronic jealousy and hatred will etch lines on their face sooner and the stress of competing with the pretty girls (instead of the smart thing, cooperation) will make them even uglier.

Remember that fairytale trope? The Ugly Sisters.  Based in reality.

Female bullying targets are always superior to their bullies. Take heart, ladies.

Are feminists Munchausan’s sufferers?

We’ve covered a lot of theories here.
They might be trolls.
They might be brain-damaged.
They have a disturbing amount in common with cults.
They might have a form of Munchausens.


…The above examples, while seemingly rational to irrational minds, are also common symptoms of a very real, and very serious, psychological disorder: Munchausen syndrome. In those affected, there is such an intense need for attention, people are willing to lie, exaggerate, poison themselves, and even undergo unnecessary surgeries in order to garner the sympathy of others. Those suffering from the disorder will often feel the urge occur more severely when others are suffering, putting their own attention at risk.

cough rape accusations, swatting and doxxing cough

I feel fully confident in saying modern radical feminism is the sociological manifestation of Munchausen. By constantly painting yourself as an oppressed person, as a victim in need of special protection or consideration, and by driving this point with an “ends justify the means” mentality, you are exhibiting the same symptoms as a Munchausen patient, especially in a world where true oppression exists—Malala, for example.

She chickened out and moved to England, we don’t want her. She isn’t a hero. She’s a coward who abandoned her fellow women for an easy life in a first-world country. Yet feminists support her because she wears a head-scarf around them and they can play sidekick.

When you have to stretch reality beyond the point of tearing in order to find a way in which you are somehow victim to the boogeyman … when you have to spit in the faces of victims in order to continue your reign as Queen of the Oppressed … when it isn’t just you, rather tens of thousands of people just like you … maybe it is time for an intervention.

A big one.

Feminist Society renames itself Ugly Girls Club

I cannot mock this. Literally. There is no wiggle room.


When Royal Holloway’s feminist society put a stall up in their university union to campaign about consent, they heard one ignorant man snidely refer to them as “the ugly girls club”. Obviously bothered by the ridiculous label this ill-informed guy had given them, they managed not to dwell on the wholly uncalled for insult, and instead turned their frustration into something amazing.

This is the level of delusion we are dealing with.

Changing the name of their feminist group to ‘The Ugly Girls Club’ on Facebook, the society’s members began taking stereotypically ‘ugly’ pictures of themselves pulling hilariously unflattering faces, and hashtagging #uglygirlsclub.

That ugly picture trend only works if you’re attractive and provide both photos side-by-side.

Here’s the twitter page. https://twitter.com/RHuglygirlsclub
and the Society page http://www.su.rhul.ac.uk/activities/society/feminism/
I’m familiar with this group of feminists, they’re really left-wing. Like, really, notoriously. http://www.su.rhul.ac.uk/activities/society/leftforum/ They go to a lot of London stuff. I can’t state specifically of course, but you see a lot of the same less-than-alluring faces around.

Went through contacts and this post seems to be the infraction. Get over it? No no no, that would be grown-up and they even lied about when and where they heard it, typical.

We even know what they were wearing, because beauty standards are evil.

Swedish feminists are trying to rebrand the hymen and lie about virginity


I went looking for this material because I came across a discussion including the term ‘corona’ and wondered how on Earth I could fail to know a part of female anatomy being both female and a studier of (real) anatomy.

Often known by the established term “hymen,” the vaginal corona is the subject of many myths and misunderstandings. The most important of these is the notion that a person’s vaginal opening is covered by a membrane that ruptures with, or is “broken” by, vaginal sex. This is incorrect. There is no such membrane.

It is literally right there.
You can touch it and break it.
Denying reality, as usual.

RFSU (the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education) wishes to dispel the myths and promote knowledge of the true facts. Our aim is to give you a more accurate idea of what you will find just inside the vaginal opening.

That sentence makes no logical sense. If it’s inside the opening it can’t be a closure membrane. And true facts? As opposed to which other type?

At first it reads as semi-legitimate talking about the natural variance from woman to woman but then it starts the long drive into crazy town.

Since the vaginal corona isn’t a brittle membrane the sensation when you first stretch out the mucous tissue folds – whether you’re inserting a tampon, masturbating or having insertive sex – is a highly individual experience. Some people feel no pain at all, while others, with a thicker vaginal corona, have reported some pains. There may be minor ruptures in the mucous folds that hurt, and sometimes there may be a little bleeding.

I hope I don’t need to point out the many contradictions therein.

Can the vaginal corona “break” when you ride a bike or a horse?

No. Since the vaginal corona isn’t a brittle membrane, physical exercise doesn’t break it. The vaginal corona is located 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening – in other words, entirely within the vestibule. A whole bunch of things (vaginal discharges, hormonal changes, menses, masturbation, sex) can wear the corona away more over time, living your life among them, but that’s not about breaking anything.

Doctors the world over would disagree with you. Tampons and horse riding are the top reasons it can be partially stretched (as they admitted) or completely torn. Using pseudo-medical terms like rupture doesn’t change what physically occurs.

The various myths and the incorrect assumption that there is a covering membrane have given rise to expressions such as “breaking the hymen” and “deflowering.” These usually refer to a person having their vagina entered for the first time, either by themselves or by having sex with a partner. What’s actually there is the vaginal corona,

But you said at the top that the corona is just another name for the hymen, so breaking the hymen still happens, whether you call it a rupture or not, and it’s still “actually there”

consisting of elastic folds of mucous tissue, which can’t be ruptured or broken in one fell swoop by a penis or any other object inserted into the vagina.

Yes. Yes it can. Ask a straight man, that’s kinda what the penis is for, evolutionally, to gain access to the vagina.

When the mucous tissue is stretched, minor ruptures sometimes develop and may smart a little. These soon heal, usually within 24 hours. The folds of the vaginal corona are located 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, so penis length is irrelevant.

Penis length is irrelevant only if you are a lesbian.
Either these breakages “heal” or “wear away”, which is it? You can’t have both. One is up, the other down.
Anyone using the terms partner (instead of man/woman) and this, new, “corona” – feminist.

Virginity is a vague concept based on perceptions and myths, chiefly concerning female sexuality, that RFSU (or Scarleteen!) would not wish to endorse. For one thing, virginity is often associated with a heteronormative view of sex restricted to vaginal intercourse between man and woman (in other words, insertion of the penis into the vagina). For another, in many languages and cultures, virginity is synonymous with innocence, the opposite of which is guilt. There is no guilt involved in having sex, and no need to feel guilty about it. [DS: I could think of a few examples.] What’s more, such myths are used against women in particular [victimhood bells ring out]; for instance as an excuse for spreading rumors and committing sexual assaults.

We sometimes receive questions about how to know whether or not you are a “virgin.” You are the only person who can decide that. [not a gynaecologist?] Different people have different ideas about which sexual acts constitute a “loss of virginity.” Some people restrict it to vaginal intercourse [often correctly], while others count other activities as well. [those people are not hetero and will presumably never have sex with the opposite sex but the idea of being even technical virgins forever is too mentally scarring for them so they say ‘me too’!]

The worst part is the poor women who will believe this out of innocence.

Is it possible to see or feel whether a woman has ever had sex?

No. Looking at a penis or a vagina, it’s equally impossible to tell whether that person has ever had sex. Neither a gynecologist nor a sex partner can tell whether you’ve had vaginal, oral, anal or manual sex (unless you have become pregnant or contracted a sexually transmitted infection). No one else can detect whether you’ve had sex.

Actually you can contract STIs without having had sex, little known fact. Using infected towels on the privates or unclean speculums, for example. If a woman’s hymen is completely intact (as it has always been, that individual shape or thickness), it’s highly likely she is a virgin, although it may heal back to its former state at first, another little known fact. But hey, they said there’s no such thing as a membrane and why would they lie to us? It’s just a medically validated self-evident part of anatomy. Some women have very little there or it’s easily broken with other activities or over time (see above) so you can never be 100% certain and you really need to trust their word. You should be able to tell from the fact they have no idea what they’re doing.

Can the corona be stitched up?

Surgery on the vaginal corona rarely solves any problems, [reduces the number of honour killings] first because outcomes vary, and second because it helps to maintain patriarchal structures and a prejudiced view of women and their sexuality.

Seriously? Seriously.

Let’s see who these people are. The same Swedes with the ever-rising rape rates, which cultural beliefs brought this about?

RFSU’s mission since the organisation was founded in 1933 has been a desire to change people’s lives for the better. RFSU is a non-profit organisation independent of any political party or religion. We are dedicated to promoting a well-informed, open-minded attitude to sexuality and relationship issues. RFSU is founded on a firm belief that sexuality and relationships are central to the individual and to society. By informing and educating people and shaping opinion, RFSU aims to break down prejudices, overcome ignorance and improve sexual health in Sweden and abroad. RFSU views sexuality as a matter of individual liberty and human rights, in which all of us have the freedom to be ourselves, the freedom to choose and the freedom to enjoy.

To put this achingly simplistically, virginity is when you’ve never had sex. The first time you do, you cease to be one. That is final. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something.

I remain unconvinced and unimpressed. To me, a corona is still either a cheap beer or this

It means crown in Latin, they want to rebrand it because hymen doesn’t make them feel special enough.