Sadly needed

You’ve always needed permission to take someone’s picture, especially in public places like London.

http://www.urban75.org/photos/photographers-rights-street-shooting.html

There’s nothing stopping you taking pictures of people in public places within reason, but if you start shoving your zoom lens up their nostrils or taking action shots of their every step, there’s a chance you might get a clip around the ear from your aggrieved subject or possibly face a legal charge of harassment or breach of the peace.

aka PUA videos must be fake or the subject would sue.

Harassment is defined as a ‘course of conduct’ (so it has to happen at least twice) that causes another person ‘alarm or distress’, but we have to say that the bullying and aggressive antics of the paparazzi would suggest that prosecutions are few and far between.

The press have police protection. Normies do not.

With some countries having stronger privacy laws, UK snappers looking to commercially exploit images of recognisable people snapped without their consent may find international clients unenthusiastic unless a model release has been obtained.

For porn, which it isn’t.

Especially bad since they target little girls. Even targeting an adult is weird and unconsenting.

There’s also a remote chance that photographs of people in public places may be subject to the Data Protection Act,

and legal right to privacy

right to the use of their likeness

reputation damages

but that’s pretty unlikely if there’s no other identifying information accompanying the image.

You can normally identify people, actually. Again, one law for them… another for everyone else.

That MP knows nothing.

http://www.photographers-resource.co.uk/photography/Legal/Access_Rights.htm

Some places that we think of as being public do have photo restrictions, and there are bylaws governing the requirement of getting written permission from the relevant authority/owner and paying a hefty fee and this includes Trafalgar Square, Parliament Square and the Royal Parks.

Photos of celebrites on the Tube weirds me out. Leave them alone. For a while Tom Hiddleston had some dedicated stalkers there.

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/jun/15/upskirting-to-become-a-criminal-offence-punishable-by-two-years-in-jail

We didn’t need this in the 20s or hell, the 19th Century, when women were nearly popping out of their tops with bare shoulders and arms.

People didn’t randomly try and rope strangers into making fetish porn.

Part of the fetish is the unconsenting part.

In the most serious cases, those convicted of secretly photographing underneath someone’s clothing without their consent in England and Wales will be placed on the sex offender register. 

Without their consent. Operative words.

You need a signed model release (signed after they’ve approved of the images) if it’s going to be spread from one device to another and especially published online.

Such invasive behaviour is currently prosecuted under either the offence of outraging public decency or as a crime of voyeurism under the Sexual Offences Act. 

That Emma Watson photo was sick.

Why are Asians against Yellow Fever?

As a token, common example.

I came across this,

https://nextshark.com/asian-dating-website-creepy/


Fake femininity, told ya so. It’s fake as Bella Hadid’s plastic face.

They drop it when you put a ring on it – or stop making so much money.
They also drop it around other women, especially white and/or blonde women (seen as competition), which is how I know from plenty of experience. They do have a bitch side, every woman does, and if you’ve never seen it, it must be BAD.

Vaguely controlling in a distinctly abusing manner, behind a veneer of sweetness.
Read around, the worst kind of abuse happens with a smile. They do it knowing it’s hard to say no. Feminine wiles? Toxic ones.

To be fair, in some ways they have to be behaviourally conditioned as female and kittenish, girlish, to get a date, it’s a social pressure. If they behaved like mature and serious adults, the disconnect to their pedomorphic features would creep even a fetishist out.

They’re the biggest SJWs too but, sure, white women are the only gold-diggers in existence (???).
If the poor woman being hit on and harassed by these guys doesn’t go along with it, they chalk it up to a demure culture rather than being a bitch. Because all white women are sluts, right?

They say they’re attracted to Asians…
Until she refuses to dress, talk and act the way they want.
Usually like a teenager.
Nothing creepy about this at all. Controlling? Men? Domestic abuse rates?
Don’t look at this pesky things! That’s misandrist!
As she points out, it is …what is it they call it? Positive racism?
They still have their ‘white privilege’ even if they breed out. You don’t lose the racist card to SJWs.
The fetishists are still all about the women-pleasing and putting random women on pedestals, only they took a love of anime too far.
I feel sorry for the women fetishized who didn’t want any part in this, like the women that tool grabbed by the neck in Japan.
WTF is wrong with these borderlines and narcissists? The former is difficult to spot in men but they fear abandonment and therefore seek control in relationships, the guys going on and on about how a white woman would 100% divorce them but an Asian never would (I should look up those stats) are pinging.
Why does she show her guns, you might wonder?
Well, the lower dimorphism in Asians means the women are more masculine (by androgyny) than the average white. So they aren’t even more feminine, the culture has to enforce this!
That is precisely why the biggest SJWs are now Asian. They’re opposing the culture that tells them to fake femininity to get men interested. The future of social justice is yellow, with black back-up.

Peruse
http://creepywhiteguyspart2.tumblr.com/
at your pleasure
They don’t even like these women, and these women know it.
I’m on the side of the gold-digging Asian at this point, these bastards deserve it.

They think Asians are ‘tame’ and will hereby put up with any rudeness, up to and including abuse (including the lesser-known sexual sadism, ropes and choking and such).

http://iamwizz.tumblr.com/post/153009511824
“You shouldn’t have needed it, but if you did need proof to the “you can date a POC and still be extremely racist?” HERE IT FUCKING IS.”

They’re still called racist because if anything they’re more racist than whites who only date other whites.
They’re seeing the person, not the complexion. For signalling points?
Nobody deserves to be spoken to like this. No human.
Grade A proof of the Mantrum too. It’s literally nothing to do with him. They’re emotionally unstable but have no period to blame.
Thankfully the non-white women are onto the fact that there are crazy white men with personality disorders who think ‘dating down’ gives them an excuse to be abusive.

Essay by son of White man with Yellow Fever

I keep seeing these heartbreaking cases.
Nobody listens to them. Nobody cares.
We prioritize the sex lives of the parents without a shred of sympathy for the health and life of the child. I’ve never met one that didn’t self-hate and live a miserable life, because of a choice that was never theirs.
It’s the reason I keep bringing it up. This has severe consequences.

I mean, what can you really say?

Poor love.

A Keanu is one in a million. Good for him, though.

I genuinely feel like that’s being born in some kinda prison. Mulatto are accepted, at least.

found from

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/wtf-to-be-the-asian-son-of-a-white-man-and-asian-woman-is-an-unimaginable-hell.660399

To quote what they quote, which is bad enough.

So what is it like? Humiliation, degradation, terror, fear, embarrassment, shame, self-hatred, angst, debasement, sadness, hopelessness, pain, anger, rage, etc etc need I go on? You can’t imagine the internal conflict. The brutal civil war inside all Hapa males. The Hapa Paradox. We exist because Asian men are humiliated and emasculated, and yet we are Asian males. We are at war with ourselves from birth. The idea that an Asian man like me, is genetically 50% white, and carries ONLY the white-male Y chromosome. The Asian Y-chromosome is dead in me. Asian maleness is dead in me. I’m a Eunuch. I’m an Asian male inside a dead Asian male. That is what it means to be half-white, half-asian.”

Was shagging an Oriental for your fetish really worth it?
Hating yourself is one thing, but loathing your future spawn is evil.

He feels cucked, to name the Beast, and there is parasitism on par with the cuckoo bird in cases of dominant genetics e.g. Asian in this case, Asian genes dominate European. Few people know this but think about it.

“All the way back in the 2nd grade, thats how I defined my identity. I would introduce my essay by saying My name is SEML and I’m half white and half asian. So when I was only 7 years old, that was already who I was. My very identity. The thing that made me me, for better or worse. And life has shown it is only for worse. The law of life for the Hapa male is that Murphy was an optimist, everything that can’t go wrong, will go wrong. Has gone wrong. Life is a daily rape for the Hapa male. One long humiliation. One long emasculation. It feels like acid runs through my veins, like my skeleton wants to jump out of my body and strangle me. That is what it means to be an Eurasian male. The very term Hapa is a colonial term from Hawaii. A slur. And what else do Hapas deserve but slurs? So its appropriate that Hapa pride means taking pride in a slur. Non-Hapas can not imagine what it is like to be a Hapa. To be the Asian son of a white man and Asian woman. It is an unimaginable hell. Dante’s Inferno could not devise a more cruel torture. Its like being strangled from the inside.”

People are going to laugh at him for this.
For daring to be honest and disapprove of his parents, hating what they each were.

What kind of life do WM/AFs think they can give their Asian-looking sons? What goes through their heads, when the DR says “its a boy”? What right do they think they have to rule over an Asian man? What makes a white man and an asian woman a parent to an asian man? How can they curse an innocent infant with such a miserable life that they have created? they make this world a shitty place to be an Asian male, and they then create an Asian male.

It is the worst form of child abuse.”

We need more mixed-race kids being honest with their parentals.
Their kids are entitled to their opinion, damn it.
But it isn’t PC, CM protects them. The children are left to… well, I looked at the psychiatric outcomes.
It isn’t good.

Knowing your parents hate the respective halves of you they contributed must do a number on your head.
They aren’t allowed to be public with this, in general.
Knowing at least one parent chose the other, not based on love, but a sexual fetish?
Knowing this from a young age?
Poor dear.

“Its bad enough being an Asian-American male watching WM/AF from the outside. Can you imagine being a Hapa male, feeling WM/AF from the INSIDE? Feeling WM/AF inside you? It is a rape. Life is just a long torture and rape for the Hapa male. Hated by all.”

rape is the correct use of the term, a forcible taking
he feels his identity has been taken away from both sides and that is correct

“Asian males hate hapa males too, when they realize they are hapa. But Asian men are right to hate Hapas. When they look at me, all they can see is WM/AF. Can I blame Asian men for hating me, when I hate myself far far far more for the exact same reason? If they knew more about me, they would hate me more. To the white race, I’m just yellow subhuman scum. The best I can do is get on my knees, and constantly advertise my white dad, and beg for a modicum of acceptance. The good guys hate me because I’m evil, the bad guys hate me because they are evil. Hapas are unloveable monsters. Freaks. Beasts. Subhuman scum. We wander this earth, hounded from all directions. Strangers in every land. Homeless. Raceless. Strangers to strangers. We are ghosts without bodies.”

There are non-white forms of genocidal breeding, we don’t point this out often enough.

The way he feels is valid and he has every right to own those feelings.
I just hope he gets professional help with those issues instead of suicide, like many of them.

And then I think 1/4 children Asian women produce are in my exact same situation. To be hapa is to be hapless. The one good thing about being hapa is you have 1 WM/AF in the world you can hold hostage- your own parents. WM/AFs don’t have to give a shit what their Asian brothers, fathers, family and friends think. They do have to give a little crap what their own son thinks.”

the parents deserve to be hated
They cursed their child.
look at dating studies sometime, at the very least?

“So its a big deal to them, when the offspring of WM/AF calls out WM/AF to their face. That is the one power in the world, Hapas possess, the power to be a terrible son. Hows that for a revolt against Confucian filial piety?

Will you call me a racist if I say I hate white men?”

If you mean your father, not at all. That is rather common if they fail as a father figure. You have that right. He behaved in a way that screws you over for life. It’s reasonable to be angered and you can’t exactly get over it, can you?

“How can you when I am just as white as I am Asian?”

there are anti-white whites

“If I’m to give the devil his due, and say one nice thing about white men it is that his sperm produces beautiful daughters, while Asian sperm produces repulsive she-beasts.”

I can’t argue against this, except for maybe the first part. Only to other fetishists.
If we banned cosmetic surgery,the truth would out. The women from these unions do look Other.

“A whiteboy writes: “WHITE GUYS AND ASIAN GIRLS ARE THE FUTURE , TOGETHER THEY ARE GOING TO CREATE A EURASIAN SUPER RACE OF BEAUTIFUL AND HYPERINTELLIGENT CHILDREN”

no such thing as a super-race that is mixed, that blurs both selective advantages in both composite groups, it’s called genetic load in formal scientific terms, they are novel mutation combinations – see organ donation issues
Darwin 101
the superior race is the #1 competitor, that’s it
and to say mixed race IS a race (when it’s comprised of two or more) is a category mistake
it’s logically impossible

“; Glad to be part of that future of beautiful and intelligent Eurasian males, who get treated by the world as Asians and thus look at WM/AFs including their own parents the same way bitter Asian guys do.”

I don’t think the Forneys of the world understand just how bitter their own sons would be, especially since they think they can lecture the outgroup child on masculinity, as he pointed out earlier. They have neither the right nor the cultural training. You can’t learn it. You need to have grown up inside the system to understand it.

“So anyway thats just a little window into the world of the Hapa man, one of the fastest growing populations in 21st century America!”

Freud! Sexual theory, inversion

http://www.bartleby.com/278/1.html
I think people don’t read Freud because they assume they know what he will say.

Stay tuned for traps, queers, degeneracy and genetic aspersions.

It’s like asking a Communist for a good book on capitalism. Psychodynamics is the natural enemy of postmodernism. Everything you do is loaded with meaning, nothing you say matters. It isn’t perfect but it has use. It digs down into motive, unlike, say, the gay triangle of CBT, where thoughts magically pop out of nowhere ~dynamic unconsciousness screams into the void~

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15″

Hello, DSM 5.

n.b. The ICD is the DSM only stronger. It’s a huge, honest list of insurance codes. They don’t pretend to care about you, pay the man and take your pills.

A momentary pause for memes that get funnier the more psychodynamics you know.

     

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15  That the inverted are not degenerates in this qualified sense can be seen from the following facts:  16  1. The inversion is found among persons who otherwise show no marked deviation from the normal.  17  2. It is found also among persons whose capabilities are not disturbed, who on the contrary are distinguished by especially high intellectual development and ethical culture. 7  18  3. If one disregards the patients of one’s own practice and strives to comprehend a wider field of experience, he will in two directions encounter facts which will prevent him from assuming inversions as a degenerative sign.  19  (a) It must be considered that inversion was a frequent manifestation among the ancient nations at the height of their culture. It was an institution endowed with important functions. (b) It is found to be unusually prevalent among savages and primitive races, whereas the term degeneration is generally limited to higher civilization (I. Bloch). Even among the most civilized nations of Europe, climate and race have a most powerful influence on the distribution of, and attitude toward, inversion. 8  20″

Nurture theorists got nothing on this man.

“Innateness.—Only for the first and most extreme class of inverts, as can be imagined, has innateness been claimed, and this from their own assurance that at no time in their life has their sexual impulse followed a different course. The fact of the existence of two other classes, especially of the third, speaks against the assumption of its being congenital. Hence, the propensity of those holding this view to separate the group of absolute inverts from the others results in the abandonment of the general conception of inversion. Accordingly in a number of cases the inversion would be of a congenital character, while in others it might originate from other causes.…..

The Relation of Bisexuality.—Since the time of Frank Lydston, Kiernan, and Chevalier, a new stream of thought has been introduced for the explanation of the possibility of sexual inversion. This contains a new contradiction to the popular belief which assumes that a human being is either a man or a woman.”

Unfortunately, Freud appeared to have predicted all this gender binary business.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Sexuality is fluid down generations. Evolution. No naturalistic fallacy about bonobos here, plz.

“Psychic hermaphroditism would gain in substantiality if parallel with the inversion of the sexual object there should be at least a change in the other psychic qualities, such as in the impulses and distinguishing traits characteristic of the other sex. But such inversion of character can be expected with some regularity only in inverted women; in men the most perfect psychic manliness may be united with the inversion. …”

Lesbian neuroscience testosterone studies. 2D:4D ratios. The homosexual male’s femininity is a parody, a social role. They had no trouble hiding it when it was illegal.

He did write a whole book on Leonardo assuming he was homosexual, the reason moderns assume it, so he may be slightly biased in favour of the male purely because his own mother abandoned him to a nanny. We call this attachment issues in child psychology but it’s essentially Freud Pure.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Kinsey hasn’t got shit on Freud.
~confetti~

“A spokesman of the masculine inverts stated the bisexual theory in its crudest form in the following words: “It is a female brain in a male body.” But we do not know the characteristics of a “female brain.” The substitution of the anatomical for the psychological is as frivolous as it is unjustified. The attempted explanation by v. Krafft-Ebing seems to be more precisely formulated than that of Ulrich but does not essentially differ from it. v. Krafft-Ebing thinks that the bisexual predisposition gives to the individual male and female brain cells as well as somatic sexual organs.”

Sounds epigenetic.

“These centers develop first towards puberty mostly under the influence of the independent sex glands. We can, however, say the same of the male and female “centers” as of the male and female brains; and moreover, we do not even know whether we can assume for the sexual functions separate brain locations (“centers”) such as we may assume for language.  33  After this discussion, two thoughts, as it were, remain; first, that a bisexual predisposition is to be presumed for the inversion also, only we do not know wherein it exists beyond the anatomical formations; and, second, that we are dealing with disturbances which are experienced by the sexual impulse during its development. 11  34  ”

Number of abuse victims studies. Sheer quantity, cannot be ignored.
And have you ever met a gay guy that loves his father?
Fuck you, Dad!” the lifestyle crisis.

Traditionally, all fathers asked of their sons was to produce another heir….

crude compensation or coping mechanism
another thrilling round of-

“The Sexual Object of Inverts.—The theory of psychic hermaphroditism presupposed that the sexual object of the inverted is the reverse of the normal. The inverted man, like the woman, succumbs to the charms emanating from manly qualities of body and mind; he feels himself like a woman and seeks a man.  35  But however true this may be for a great number of inverts it by no means indicates the general character of inversion. There is no doubt that a great part of the male inverted have retained the psychic character of virility, that proportionately they show but little the secondary characters of the other sex, and that they really look for real feminine psychic features in their sexual object. If that were not so it would be incomprehensible why masculine prostitution, in offering itself to inverts, copies in all its exterior, to-day as in antiquity, the dress and attitudes of woman.”

The original ‘are traps gay?’

To round off by repeating one section considering our current knowledge of the microbiome and the possible role of Gay Germ theory.

“It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. ”

How about you read the thing before taking an SJW’s word for it?

Their definition of homophobia and privilege are also deeply Freudian.

Yellow Fever fetish and connection to pedophilia?

Tongue firmly in cheek, let’s do this.

lovelovechina.com/general/yellow-fever-pedophilia/

See, while I’m sure there will be a sudden influx of outraged fat white boys trying to ‘disprove’ this connection because they consume entirely too much porn, they will also start going on about the pubic hairlessness of Asian women and how their vaginas are tighter.*

So, there’s that.

sensible chuckle

It’s the definition of rapist creepy to impose childish standards on sexually mature adults. I guess it matches the emotional maturity of the fetishist speaking. Of course, the PC brigade won’t dare touch this subject despite the overt master/servant dynamic.

While I’m in a mean mood and discussing the objective specifics of attractiveness, I did see a startling comparison of the pre-surgery Asian women (who are always trying to look White for some strange reason…) and White Down’s Syndrome women, especially with the eye area.

I was startled to see there was a case.

I was startled to see there was a case.

The physical similarity of many Asians cannot be denied, they get surgery partially to differentiate themselves for marriage or work. I think this is genetic owing to their population explosion from the few lucky or wealthy enough to survive famine and war, they used to come from a very restricted stock.

The flatness of the Asian face in particular is often altered to give it a European structure e.g. a nasal bridge and less manjaw, but oddly, the manboys who can’t do better will insist these women are more feminine…..

O.K.

Disclaimer: Yes there are always exceptions and I’m sure your Thai Bride / internet girlfriend / imaginary submissive Asian wife is it. Ignore how Asian princesses are becoming worse than LA girls in brattish behaviour and entitlement.

I’ve yet to see a mixed Asian – European child that wasn’t ugly, as was pointed out in that thread. It’s odd, don’t you think? And we all know by now about the rate of psychiatric illnesses, I’ve linked to first-person discussions of that fact, genetic load is a bitch, like Mother Nature. When certain alleles evolved for a geographic region, playing God and randomly cramming them together does cause medical problems. Without going into specific mixed issues like transplant impossibilities (within their ‘own’ family) and genetic disease rates.

I just wonder if the white party is really thinking this through, they are frequently disturbed when you point out the fact their grandchildren wouldn’t look like them, at all. They’d look like strangers. White genes being the most recessive by far, this also applies to others e.g. Asians mixing with more dominant groups e.g. Latin.

Assuming the often fetishized Asian woman doesn’t turn into the short, prematurely aged shrew we know from stereotype, it’s common for the more attractive parent to disown or give less attention to ugly children, less investment. This happens to all animals, who view the ugliness as deformity and don’t wish to waste resources on something that probably won’t reproduce anyway itself (a physical death, albeit delayed) so they literally give less time, less food (see birds for a clear example) and less resources overall to the ugly child but… if you choose someone from a much uglier average group (this includes class, so an upper caste Asian shouldn’t mix with a lower White either) – what do you expect?

How can you expect the child will take after the more blessed parent? Hybrid vigour is a myth. Blending two very different things removes the uniqueness of each.

Without going into the culturally encouraged makeup and surgery (far more than the West, as standard, no natural beauty) and in some cases, the distinct possibility you’ll have to adopt because that Thai babe suddenly into you used to possess a larger penis.

But sure, argue they’re more feminine….

cute wink

Hey, it’s your genetic lineage. You go right ahead.
We’ll judge the tree by its fruit, amirite?

In other points, Asians are more monogamous than Whites on average and these fetishists often believe cheating is expected, if not moral, and yet expect sexual faithfulness from their woman while being polygamous themselves. This doesn’t happen, fidelity is the bond, not the behaviours. If one partner cheats, the bond is gone. This is another symptom of r-type delusions of grandeur re Oriental concubines. They believe Asian women are innately easier to control and thus consider them ‘better’ women. All claptrap of course, and they aren’t prepared for the cultural expectations e.g. taking in and caring for her elderly relatives, all of them.

*  (Obvious myth, there’s as much variance within a race as between for organ morphology, how would they give birth you morons). Read the Kama Sutra, based on Indians (one subrace) they acknowledge there are still three genital sizes for men and women, but they’re all pretty much the same. As in, you don’t really notice. This, in the Kama Sutra, marriage manual. I think they’d know, as it was written by Asians?

Neotony doesn’t blend well with masculine (read: mature) features anyway, you get neither. That’s why plain people parent supermodels.

Encouraging men to be criminals isn’t ‘alpha’

This is the stupidest Alpha posturing post I have ever seen.

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/live-bold.html

The manosphere makes the simple error of availability bias: they base all of their advice on an entire sex, which exists worldwide with as much variance as men, around the narrowest of demographic bands: white American sluts with nothing better to do than hang out at bars (alcoholics).

You can spit in a girl’s face and she will still be attracted to you. You can call her terrible vulgar names and she will still be attracted to you. You can even beat her up repeatedly and she will still be attracted to you.

Do you want to attract borderlines? Because that’s how you attract borderlines.

Women aren’t crazy, the ones attracted to you are.
Once you hit double, triple digits of failed affairs, the problem isn’t the women, the common denominator of failed relationships is you. Dodging responsibility is such a feminist move e.g. women shouldn’t carry weapons to defend themselves, why are women being attacked?

Do you blame the people giving you this advice? No. You know they’re trashy when you got involved and you liked it. You don’t get to change your mind at the end and pretend you were taken in. The PUA-types like Bad Girls and want a Good Girl’s Happy Ending. It’s deluded as the career woman thinking she can pick up a man at 30 like dry cleaning.

No wonder these guys get hauled in front of the courts on assault charges and rape accusations, they 100% deserve it if this is the nonsense they internalize. Then play Victim like the bitchy gamma they secretly are. If confronted by such a woman’s brothers, uncles or father, they’d shriek like a banshee, we all know it. This macho posturing is now opening up the door to incitement, since when is attacking women a show of strength? I covered the reddit abusers trying to justify their crminal actions as redpill (using it as a shield, little cowards) when actually redpill theory is essentialism, traditonalism, that treats the weaker sex with respect because they don’t have to prove anything to anyone (this is all homoerotic posturing to other, decent men, who are naturally disgusted). It gets worse.

You can be a complete psychopath, murder your parents, or tattoo a swastika into your forehead, and more than a few women will actually find that attractive.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

All it takes is one sperg to believe you. These are the ones saying SlutHate are deluded for thinking women value looks (lookism). Hybristophilia is a fetish. It occurs in men too. That’s like say all men are trannies, and secretly want dresses, because a few men like to wear little girl dresses and feel a desire to self-castrate. It’s so damn wrong I don’t believe I have to point this out, what are you all thinking? You don’t know the female mind better than us. We don’t know yours better than you. Quit playing Professor Xavier and gaslighting already vulnerable mentally ill women into fitting your delusions on the entire sex (the ‘You Really Wanted It’ line is used by rapists btw, that won’t look good in court). You can make a vulnerable person believe anything (see white female Islam converts for a fitting example), but that doesn’t make it true.

The signalling to other men re violence should involve violence toward other men.
If someone challenges you to a fight in a bar, you don’t punch his girlfriend, what the hell is wrong with you? What happened to the manosphere (my guess, keyboard alpha entryism) to make this signalling reach the mass hysterical point where saying this is not only OK but met with praise?

I just.... I don't even know what to....what??

You have criminal responsibility and moral agency, you’re old enough to know better. So many people reading this are 25+, well beyond the age total ignorance is acceptable. Weren’t these guys saying we should hold men to a higher moral standard because they need to lead women? And to do it all to impress some slut? What sort of pedestal BS is that? No bitch is worth prison!

Have you actually seen Dark Triad people IRL? I don’t mean streaming Dexter on Netflix and feeling witty or reviving a videotape of American Psycho or Fight Club. Actual psychopaths and sociopaths? Have you seen what their life outcomes are and what happens once they’re past their prime (35+) and people stop putting up with their abusive nonsense and giving them 12th chances? When they’re held to an adult standard?

Read Hare’s accounts of psychopaths and read how bitchy and depressed they are and you will know pretty damn quickly these are people nobody should emulate. They hate themselves and their own lives and punish others out of envy.

You know what happens to them?

Dead or prison-raped, in general.

What marvellous advice for modern men already getting that Men Are Evil propaganda from the feminists, thanks for the show of faith in boys. That’s exactly what they want you to do, so much so I suspect this may be a black ops coup of the Narrative.

It leads me to believe the manosphere bought into black gang culture and genuinely believe criminals are glamorous, as opposed to the truth, where they’re as low as junkies and nobody shows them respect.

Going by this, any man showing deference to any woman socially (called manners and etiquette, boors) is a ‘pussy.’ Considering the type always slinging that insult (themselves losers), who cares what those manboys think? That’s the general attitude of every great man I’ve ever met.

‘Oh, you call me a pussy. Am I supposed to care?’ 

If you can be moved around like a little pawn by a word, you’re no better than the SJWs. If calling you chicken like Marty McFly will make you kill yourself, you aren’t brave, you’re terminally stupid.
Sticks and stones, bitches! Don’t react to a few non-applicable terms like they’re a punch in the face or an insult to your manhood.

If all you care about is counting notches, you don’t have any honour to speak of and everyone knows it.

This is meant to be an evopsych argument (women are programmed to like this – in the State of Nature, not the 21st century, numbnuts) but all the evidence points to Types. Plural. As in, different people evolved to like different things. Human taste is irreducible to a single demo, like sex. In basic studies on body type, a simple measure, computerized, we can agree it’s empirical, men thought women like Muscle Man. Huge, hulking, high maintenance. To this day, men dare disagree with the findings, as if women don’t know what sexually appeals to them, as if you can gaslight an entire sex into finding what you have sexually attractive (an anti-evolution position), just like the fat acceptance feminists (‘tingles’ is also an inaccurate term, the brain codes for attraction, a physiological response isn’t vital/instant as it is with men, it’s projection for the weakness of their own body betraying their interests, like we care), and they go on to insist that their bulking of gainzzzz is actually about women, instead of signalling social desirability as a tribal member to other men (the homoeroticism upsets them). Watch the way they compliment each other at the gym. Watch them. Hella gay.

Notes

Spitting in someone’s face is illegal. It’s assault. It’s considered worse than, say, a punch, because it transmits disease. Sometimes ranked up to battery without actual contamination. It’s a filthy thing nobody in the First World should be forgiven for doing. Live in the Middle East, they do it all the time. Considering it’s usually done by men to women too weak to throw a punch, this would be an aggravating factor for sentencing as an act of misogyny, don’t take cues from porn, addicts. They’re paid to pretend they like bodily fluids.

Lynsey [1995] is the case law relevant to the UK.

Doing things because a girl wants you to is beta.

Changing everything about your life around what you think women think is omega.

Changing your actions because of what people might think of you isn’t manly.

Being a cad used to have a social cache because it was difficult and could get you run out of town or worse. Nowadays anyone can get laid if they drop their standards enough. The glory has gone. You go to the nearest American city and buy a cougar a drink at 2am. Casanova you ain’t.

This isn’t school, who cares about being cool anymore?

Anti-socials don’t have good social relations. Duh?

‘And it doesn’t matter if you try to conceal your cowardice by calling it “being a gentleman”‘ – Not the words of traditional men in support of a Patriarchy, where all the men are forced to be gents. When they say they support such things, it is a lie and again, signalling, because men who truly believe that wouldn’t treat their peers with open disdain.

Compare with: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/when-gamma-reacts.html

“He is a coward and will abandon most everything to save his skin, and this fact gnaws on him internally. Being so narcissistic he is unable to imagine other people not being secret cowards so he will regularly talk of being brave and accuse others of being cowardly.”

They have jumped the shark.

red dwarf ace rimmer interior alligator surfing

All the reasons men might send dick pics

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/women-who-stray/201602/why-men-send-pics-their-junk

Rarely mentioned are the cases when this is known to be inappropriate e.g. when one party is a minor, married or has stated their disinterest.

It does mention the reaction fetish but curiously omits such finer details.

One issue is that men just aren’t good at hearing, or responding to “No.” I’m not excusing that. But this same dynamic, that men think women are sexually as excited as they are, is getting in the way of men hearing the “No, we DON’T want to see that!”

Blame the feminists.

Many women are genuinely bothered by receiving such pictures and view it as an unwelcome intrusion.

It’s called modesty and men complain when women lack it.
I know plenty of modest women who avoid the gym purely because we don’t want to see other naked women at the changing room.

People who are offended and grossed out at such images would like them banned. They want men to understand that such behaviors are rude, unacceptable and should simply stop. Many women have tried attacking such men, flaming and shaming them, both online and in personal communications. But such strategies probably won’t work.

It’s illegal to flash someone, how is this any different? You’re still seeing everything.

A tenet of psychology is that negative reinforcement is still reinforcement. The more uproar, outrage and disgust that such pics get, the more powerful some men feel. They feel some pride that their penis generated this strong reaction. So, shaming, banning, flaming strategies are unlikely to be successful. A better strategy is to ignore it. I know that probably feels unsatisfying. But if we remove as much of the reinforcement, including negative attention, many of these men might view this behavior as ultimately unrewarding.

But they’ll know they’ve sent it and you’ve seen it. They’re still getting off on it. That’s sadism, because they’re getting off on causing psychological distress, a form of harm. Why can’t we outlaw unsolicited messages? A certain type of come-on is harassment but flashing them electronically is fine? What sort of contradiction is that? The law must resolve this. This applies to men too, young boys online and straight men targeted by gay men (and older, say, female teachers).

It’s important that women, and men, understand that this behavior, even when it feels distasteful and rude, is not personal.

BS.

It’s called target selection.
Men tend to go by hair colour and cup size.

It’s not actually about you, the person receiving these pics. This dynamic, silly as it can be, is not proof that men are disgusting perverts and women are prudes.

Preferring to see people clothed makes one a prude now?

This behavior reveals some core differences between men and women’s sexual personalities, and that men need to work harder at understanding women’s actual sexual interests and motivations.

They know exactly what they’re doing. They’re adults.

Personally, I don’t care what people do with their phones in this way, as long as you ask permission. 

Send 2 girls 1 cup for all I care, just ask damn permission first.

Of course women have a different reaction than men, we might be visual too but that’s the least aesthetically pleasing part of a man (I won’t make crude comparisons) and they usually look the same anyway, you can’t judge anything like size that might be practical or ‘prove masculinity’ (what a silly concept) and it can spoil any air of romance up until that point.

9/10 men send them because they can. It’s electronic exhibitionism.

So we should send them granny porn. Because we can.