Liars lie

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778

Liars hiring liars leads to corruption? NO. I thought they were pure moral virtuous people better than us and smarter who can never be wrong! Saints in different robes!

Fix their hiring practices, criminal charges for fraud. Done.

no more tenure

it’s an ideological dictatorship

As I’ve covered most of the lies are in social psychology, which is heavily politically biased. It’s propaganda at this point e.g. Islamophobia bullshit.

human rights violations from experimenting on wider society

ban ‘think tanks’

Einstein e=mc^2 fraud

I didn’t embellish before but it’s a clear-cut case of plagiarism.

Archive a few of these.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/einstein-did-not-derive-e-mc2-first.28362/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/nov/11/rorycarroll

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/05/23/the-origin-of-the-equation-e-mc2/

“Professor Bartocci traced a link between De Pretto and Einstein, through Einstein’s best friend, Michele Besso.”

He hated being famous because he feared being outed in his own time.

The guy practiced incest and people still praise him.

Incest has never been a controversial thing to oppose.

The Jewish IQ posterboy is a plagiarizing pedophile.

“like a beggar clothed in purple, whom ignorant people take for a king.” 

spot on! strong words from a mild-mannered foreigner

The crazy hair matched his sexuality, even to divorce in that time was a no-no. His first wife got the Nobel money because her work as a mathematician nabbed him the prize. Letters proved it, he had to run everything past her. It’s no coincidence the Nobel is a public fiction of rich Jews giving other Jews prizes for their mutually-agreed superior intellect, think of the optics.

Why are no other intellectual prizes recognized or allowed?

Curiously, his socialism is praised despite famously running away from …a socialist regime.

Like a typical sociopath, he was a creep, a hypocrite, a liar and a thief. That’s simply the proven fact.

He denied the science required to operate on his triple A and the hubris killed him.

Comic: The Routine

Every. Fucking. Time.

 

Alternate title: Damsel in distress, pathological altruism edition.

This toxic colonialism is bullshit. Deport the cuckians first.

IQ has nothing to do with gullibility. Predators have their own intelligence.

It isn’t charity with somebody else’s money. Damselling is pride.

(And by all definitions I know, treason!)

If it’s about love, why do they want money? – hookers come in many forms

Behold, the savage prostitute. A dog turd spray-painted gold still smells like shit.

“I don’t care if she’s a stripper, we’re in love!” Geopolitical edition.

World, you aren’t a damsel, you aren’t even a dame. Whitey is not your husband, we owe you nothing.

Okay, I’ll be happy to give them a one-time lump sum if they 1. leave us alone and STFU on it forever and 2. are forbidden from using White developments, all of them. Globalism is expensive.

Technological multiculturalism is killing us. Literally.

A Breakaway Civilization

https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/richard-dolan-what-it-is-what-it-means-for-us/

“The legendary physicist, Robert J. Oppenheimer, put the matter succinctly. “There must be no barriers for freedom of inquiry,” wrote the man who led the Manhattan Project. “There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors.””

If I had a frontpage, that’d be on it.

…”What’s especially galling is that the nature of modern scientific and academic work enable such secrecy to thrive. This belies what they are supposed to do, at least according to the proponents of an open society.

They’re lying to prevent the masses from rioting.

One reason for this unhappy situation is simply how science operates. All scientific and academic inquiry is predicated upon being able to work from open and fully accessible sources. As Oppenheimer understood, scientific research must be available for examination by outsiders. The word for this is falsifiability. It’s an important concept in science. If you lack the chance to “falsify” a proposition – that is, to prove it wrong – then it’s not valid. It may in fact be true, but philosophically speaking, it’s not valid.”

Scientism loves the paywall but hates borders.

Go figure.

Pathological science

http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/03/08/pathological-science/

“Many researchers, even hobbyists and enthusiasts, want for some one result in particular to be true. They’re always on the lookout for data that support their desired conclusion. This is not, by itself, pathological;”

actually experimenter bias is a bias

“but for some who take it to an extreme, it can become that way.”

Money, fame and tenure are on the line, what incentive?

Publish or perish threat?

Your life ruined? Family ashamed? Reputation at stake? What subconscious motive?

Many famous cases of pathological science began as legitimate science, and often the researcher would become distracted by tiny results that suggested an effect when in fact there was none. Belief supplanted objectivity, and the science became pathological science.”

While it shouldn’t be used to deter experimentation, it’s the grand reply to the phrase “established science”, an appeal to authority that doesn’t exist.

e.g.

Smells like social psychology.

Islamophobia, patriarchy (as poltergeist), systemic racism (well, if it’s the system – the evolved system – it can’t be the people in the system), creationism (not that evolution is perfect), global warming by ignore cooling data over decades etc.

Anything heavily political would be pathological science e.g.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/social-psychology-fraud/

And attitude surveys aren’t science. Seriously. You see an attitude survey, you swerve.

There’s also the problem of finding one thing but claiming another e.g. woman A makes less money than man B, but failing to control for enough other factors and still have a significant gap (above chance) to claim sexism. However, there are sexist pay gaps. Why don’t they study this? Why don’t they follow the proper method? They also apply to men in female-dominant fields too! It’s political because they’d rather lie and do bad science (hurting poor women, ironically) than let men seem like the victims for five minutes!

Pseudoscience is used by self-proclaimed “skeptics” to poison the well against the competition. Team Red will say Team Blue’s work in the same field is “pseudoscience” to boost their chances of getting the finite research grants they compete over. It’s all about the money.

So you’ll find the most successful liars comprise most “celebrity scientists”, the hallmark of scientism (personality cults develop), and when their work is eventually exposed (some Freud, Kinsey not yet, Zimbardo recently) then the world is shocked because echoes don’t pass through Ivory Tower walls. The field knew. It always knew. It hid it.

There’s no such thing as pseudoscience in the sense of a forbidden topic. Distasteful yes, but so what? Do politicians dictate freedom of thought now? No, but they sign grant checks and that’s basically the same thing.

Past a certain level, isn’t commonality of a certain unPC disposition just normal?

Good men versus porn addict liars

Prime example why women need social protection.

Christians need to talk about this or our own group is a sitting, gullible duck.

Lies have legal consequences.
http://www.lovewhatmatters.com/im-that-girl-that-spent-6-months-with-a-ring-on-her-finger-that-girl-that-planned-an-entire-wedding-only-to-find-out-a-week-prior-it-was-all-a-lie/

A few obvious points, obvious to fellow K-types.

Never marry an addict.
Porn is cheating.  (see Bible)
Porn destroys marriages. (because adultery is the thrill)

“The coldest thing I’ve ever witnessed in my entire life is the lying eyes of the man I love, gazing deep into my soul as multiple lies rolled from his lips. He knew it was all a lie, but for some reason, he could look at the woman he claimed to love so dearly straight in her eyes, and lie to her face. I never knew until that moment how unconsciously cold a single person could be.”

A liar for years? Congratulations, you avoided a miserable marriage to a filthy narcissist. Being married to one of those (m/f) can make you wish you were dead, if you read countless online accounts, so God was protecting you from that.

To lie multiple times (and every day) plus once caught? Narc.
Possibly psychopath, since he only seemed to value her as a status object (wife).

Good women can still be treated like dirt by burned out r-types pretending to be traditional to cash out and “have it all” (but once the novelty has worn off, they cheat and get divorced anyway, they just wanted the status – women can do it too). Women have a right to know and avoid bad marriage prospects. (As do good men from bad women).

betrayal trauma occurs when someone we depend on for survival or are significantly attached to, violates our trust in a critical way.”

A divorce would be Christian in this case, if they had married because 1. he was depicting himself in “false light”, she didn’t know who she was marrying. Plus the abuse psychologically from the cheating (2, betrayal trauma) and the addiction itself (3, which causes brain damage).

He portrayed himself as a good, honest man to trick her into legal wedlock.

Good honest women need to be protected from this type. She was true.

He didn’t even know what love is!

Makeup you can wash off. Lies void contracts. His narc mirroring caused her emotional bond, she never really fell for him because there is no him. There’s nothing in there! No person!

Narcs prefer to bond with empaths so good women must be especially vigilant. They assume you’ll be like a replacement mother figure and never leave them, you see. There’s logic. Whatever abuse, a mother’s love is eternal.

You can’t have a good marriage and Christian life + children with an r-type.

They are never satisfied in ANY marriage, it’s the nature of personality disease!

If they could change, they’d have done it before you met or they’d be prudent enough to never get an addiction in the first place.

Narcissists run the Bird with a Broken Wing routine, don’t fall for it.

Send them to a shrink, don’t play Mommy! Your husband is supposed to be the one caring for YOU.

Professionals have to train and gain the ability to prescribe serious meds for this! You can’t talk it out!

The level of psychopathic disdain to lie to her and plan this deception over years…. likely psychopath.

I bet he randomly showed up at a church to go wife-hunting (yes, hunting) because a PUA forum told him to. AVOID the crazy. Peeple was a good idea – as a courtship app. It replicates an honour culture, where reputation is well known.

Imagine hiring a business partner and finding out they have a criminal record. Like that only a very intimate betrayal. Possibly rape by fraud. Possibly. Note her disgust at the mask drop. Solid K response.

Psychopaths’ MO is to hide who they really are (for years) until AFTER the marriage. So you can’t run.

All other mental illness typically presents before a wedding so a psycho is literally every man/woman’s worst nightmare as a fiance/e.

Get a background check. If they get defensive, immediately break it off.

False light on wikipedia doesn’t discuss marital fraud anymore (bring it back, Trump!) but there are others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

misrepresentation is an untrue or misleading[1] statement of fact made during negotiations by one party to another, the statement then inducing that other party into the contract.[2][3]

Marriage is a contract.

Legally binding.

The misled party may normally rescind the contract, and sometimes may be awarded damages as well (or instead of rescission).

https://info.legalzoom.com/meant-fraud-grounds-divorce-24925.html

Fraud
The definition of fraud in the context of divorce law varies between states. Generally, it means that one spouse grossly misrepresented issues so important that the other spouse would not have married him had she known the truth. For example, when a husband tells his wife before they married that he had never been married before and she discovers after the marriage that he was lying. His lie about his previous marriage may be considered fraud, especially if the wife can show that she would not have married him had she known this was his second marriage. Little white lies usually do not constitute fraud.”

Precisely. Christian expectations for a Christian marriage. It’s very simple.

Lies have legal consequences, degenerates.

Marriage is all about who/what you are. You lie about that, clear-cut case of fraud. K-types deserve legal protection. R-types shouldn’t care because they don’t want to marry!

Do we have to get them to sign a legal disclaimer that they haven’t falsely represented themselves?

Isn’t the marriage contract enough?

Social psychology fraud

I am shocked.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5842893/Famed-Stanford-prison-experiment-shows-naturally-abuse-power-based-LIES.html

I am looking at his book “The Lucifer Effect”.

Literally looking at it.

It is also full of shit.

He wanted to be famous because he was jealous of Milgram, ask around.

Charge him with fraud.

Make an example.

Who wants to tell them personality tests are a way to exclude races and classes you don’t like from job applications, since you aren’t allowed to use IQ?

Narrative: criminals are innocent little babies.

comment
“I have three psychology degrees (two postgraduate). One of the reasons I left academia was because I felt frustrated with the way research was conducted and how results were interpreted. Researchers often get the results they want to see and only ‘successful’ studies make it into journals. There are many highly intelligent people working in this field (or fields- psychology is diverse) and these are good people. What I discovered was often a lack of common sense in the academic bubble. In fact, ‘common sense’ was sneered at.”

Ah, confirmation bias!
Experimenter bias!

The new priests. No questioning!

Next, Kinsey.

A lot of faking about child sexuality and consent there.

In the #MeToo age, come on!

Smash all the sacred cow jars.

Obviously, embracing the animal nature of your sexuality and exaggerating it is doubleplusgood. Be less human! It’ll end well!

I’ve never seen a single life outcome study on that.

Not one.

Yet we all accept it as “fact”…

despite how basic observation demonstrates sexuality is corrosive to 1st world society.