I haz questions.

Is rape evil? Yes.
Is slavery evil? Yes.
Is porn the acceptable cover for exploiting trafficked slaves? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research.
Is it the entire demand behind slavery, for public profit? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research. There is no product without demand.
Should the government shoot all those involved in slavery? Yes. As public deterrent. Also audit for corruption and confiscate past funds.
Would porn still exist? ..No. Not new, Western porn.

Huh.

Does Porn/Hollywood (hardcore/soft) pay taxes on the money it admits to making? No.
Does porn cause known neurological issues such as hypofrontality? Yes.
Can those be reversed? Usually a little but not fully. Window of opportunity during development. Neural pruning.
Is it used to groom/corrupt children? Yes. In every case.
Is it being progressively normalised as softcore with the slippery slope over time into ‘Hollywood’? Yes.

See “The Kiss” scandal. Now adverts portray children passionately kissing. No chaste cheek pecks. Not anymore. Did you notice? A non-porn user would. Then there’s the obvious subversion:

If that happened in the 1950s, what would happen to the people who made that video?

1850s, what would happen to the producers and distributors?

What is that video, which was screen-capped from?

Did you immediately know it for what it was?

Why not?

You think you haven’t seen child porn.. but they start subtle.

This is cognitive dissonance.

Is watching rape legal? No. Aiding and abetting, duty to intervene or report.
Should watching filmed rape of trafficking victims be legal? No.
How can you tell the difference?

Trick question, there isn’t one.

Deliberately.

A non-groomed person capable of consent simply refuses to produce such videos. It is a symptom of a warped mind.

Is the purpose of porn sexual humiliation? Yes. Both viewer (Jesus warned of voyeurism’s evil and we all know about the cucks) and serial rape victim (see life outcomes of that trauma unless you’re a Guardian lefty, look for them).

Is it legal to violate your own human right to intimate privacy? Is it possible? This seal can only be broken ONCE. Consider Hollywood celebrities who strip off in films and imitate sexual acts for money. If their ‘nude photos’ aka intentionally created porn, are released, how can they be outraged? Category error prevails. There’s something lost already, they already withdrew their right to that type of privacy, their violation has been publicly witnessed. Apart from expected privacy (fair) of the photos themselves and profit of the photos themselves, what is the issue? Stigma. Like calling a porn “star” a whore when there’s video evidence. Category error. How can a celebrity with a ‘sex tape’ not be fair game for public scrutiny of who they’re fucking in future? Surely this becomes public information, acceptable fodder? You can’t have it both ways. Right to publicity has limits e.g. crime taking place, public interest in that. They surrendered that sanctity of intimacy by their own volition.

For the ‘define porn’ crowd – salacious nudity in particular situations intended to stimulate the libido. Most people wouldn’t even pose nude for an art class, finding that alone too ‘degrading’ (objectification for non-sexual purposes). Women used to produce ‘porn’ (really erotica) all the time minus the nudity condition for their husbands alone. Men didn’t carry around cameos of their wife’s face for sentimental purposes. That way, it isn’t cheating, since she can satisfy his libido on long journeys when she isn’t present to do it herself. Isn’t this, moral? So you can’t forget the issue of audience: purpose and anonymity. You can’t suddenly pick and choose who sees your material of published crassness if it’s hypothetically offered up to the world. That audience consideration is either supporting a relationship or degrading.

Middle-class white-washing of perversion pisses me off. It isn’t an art film, it’s a skin flick with subtitles.

WW2 guys encouraged to paint their planes started this.

Now rap is played to kids, subtitles of porn: ooh, aaah, yes, baby.

Targeted sexualisation of children already has a name: grooming.

Can masturbation be outlawed? No. Don’t be absurd. Strawman.
Does a healthy man need “porn” to do so? No. That is erectile dysfunction, or impotence as it used to be known.
Is porn designed as a supernormal stimulus? Yes.
Who principally uses it? Men with a surgically mutilated penis. This has been researched. Look into it.
Why? Psyops. Disenchant the white man. Attract non-whites to our shores also. A baited hook (called hookers).

Is it art? No. Modern art is also psyops. It was admitted (CIA). Meanwhile, how can there be a copyright on sterile reproductive acts, it’s medically impossible. If non-sterile, ancient therefore where is the right to charge for a thing when I can watch two flies fuck outside my window? Claim to exclusive right dismissed, where is the profit, then? Ah, subversion, distraction (bread/circuses) and international mental damage of otherwise stronger populations. Like the SJW hiring and plots.

Are people ashamed to admit they watch it? Yes.

Why? They sense the evil.

Does crime go up or down when porn is highly accessible? It goes up, see attacks on Japan’s schoolgirls for a good example. Predators are inspired by videos and practise mentally with them.

Do incarcerated prisoners show the same pattern? Yes.

Does it reduce libido? No, it actually stokes it (testosterone) and keeps the flame going, most predators have a low IQ and terrible imagination and therefore rely on external stimuli, including stories in forums about how to conduct certain attacks. Pathological populations do not behave as normal ones would predict.

What are the outcomes of porn ‘stars’, when tracked? Trauma, disease and suicide. All antisocial and preventable.
Is participation of the result, an endorsement of all practices related to it? Yes. Unless you’re a hypocrite.

Is the internet for children? No. Parents must be strongly shamed on this point.
Did erotica (the 2d non-damaging form of paper ‘porn’) exist pre-internet? Underground with legal restrictions on access from practicality.
Do kids or parents groom younger kids? Yes. Tragically.
How do they do this? Smartphones, mostly.
Do the search engines push this material on children? Yes.
Is general smartphone use in minors medically harmful? In many ways, yes.

Why aren’t smartphones/computers age restricted in sale and use? …..Apple stocks.

Customizing for wider market access, how shockingly libertarian.

And everyone gains in freedom from the situation, so it’ll never happen.

Remember degenerates, you’re probably watching people trafficked as kids, being raped.

Enjoy.

[postmodern r-types are BTFO by this line, it’s been field tested on Guardian types for maximum potency]

Think about it, what is a “pimp”? A sex slave owner.

If the threat of a beating or death looms, is that consent, shitlibs? No. No it is not. Coercion vitiates consent, likewise duress to signed contracts.

Bonus: according to whom was the Prohibition a failure?

Hollywood.

What actually happened?

Crime tanked, including rape of adults and children (alcohol is the most common date rape drug used to weaken ability to resist or plain knock kids and lightweights out) and domestic abuse of adults and children went down too (with no oh-so-convenient “drink” excuses). Why weren’t you taught that in school? Why did the People want Prohibition in the first place? They were noticing things. Consider the timing. Pre-Nazi.

As for driving things underground: should they be? Isn’t that better? Wouldn’t the thrill of taboo be better for users too?

Where is the right of healthy people to live without being bombarded by porn? It’s even outside for the “go outside” types, it’s on billboards! We do not consent, it is forced upon our minds. WHY?

How much does the stress of adverts cost us in the health service?

It is in soaps, in adverts, in kid’s films. It doesn’t sell, actually so WHY is it there, WHY isn’t there a choice in whether to consume it knowingly, beforehand? Bring back the CODE, Hollywood fears it.

Even young male toplessness in “kid’s films” would’ve disgusted your recent ancestors. Is nudity always sexual or not, Hollywood? Then why include it, or not? Rationing levels of clothing certainly don’t apply now, do they?

You want high culture? Bring back the laws about what theatres can and cannot show (previously covered). Most people want to go to the theater – if they had ratings systems like films – nudity, political propaganda, sexuality bullshit. We want to see real plays, not facsimile brothel shows. Most plays aren’t selling because we don’t want to see naked strangers, on stage or in the gym, thanks. Goes for most young people, actually. In surveys.

As for the white issue with ‘sexbots’ – they creep us out as lifeless humanoids. It triggers our disgust to necrophilia (or rape of the vulnerable and unconscious). The slow ones in motion and ‘speech’ seem mentally backward, like children (or physically looking like children). A chosen people who produce them and attempt to normalise their use in the MSM do not view the group they resemble as human, so to them it’s more like bestiality and they enjoy it as a sign of their superiority. They also have no historic qualms with rape. First they must produce dependent customers in the out-group by alienating them from the loving thing it seeks to cheaply replace. Seen any bots like that lately? Any youtube comments seem weirdly repetitive or targeted in this direction? Why does youtube allow them? Finally, they seek to monetise the constant online feed of spying data… for updates, of course. There won’t be a Tinder-like database of your fetishes and intimate photos. That’s impossible.

Right not to see degeneracy

We have one.

Cinemas still have age-restrictions, this is no different.

Sites like google put porn in totally innocent homework searches.

Child porn addicts:
In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013.
Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232).

ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use-attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf

Dead link now, weird that.

Check yourbrainonporn.com for addiction and neuroscience information.

Child locks on ISPs have always existed, nothing is banned. The UK shouldn’t be producing this stuff. America won’t stop.

What would they say if children were smoking? They used to.

Let’s go back to this bullshit because Sargon doesn’t want to verify his age at the off-license ONE TIME.

You do that every single time you want to drink or smoke but this is clearly a bridge too far for the responsible lefty adults with muh freedoms.

Don’t BOTHER bringing up the fact this policy will cease enabling child addicts.

Don’t even BOTHER. Because you checked, right? You know?

And the clear social message? Yeah, what deterrent? This degeneracy should be underground, I don’t wanna see that. What about my rights? Children shouldn’t be able to view things online they cannot also legally view in person. They can’t go to strip clubs or BDSM shows, they shouldn’t be able to attend virtually.

I love how libertarians assume most people in society are degenerates. No.

Kids are also grooming one another on school wifis and encouraged to groom more kids in a cycle of abuse by adult pedos. It happens.

The latest report:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2018
They don’t really look into it, weirdly.

“Around one in five 12-15s (22%) who opted to answer the question said they had been contacted
online by someone they didn’t know, and one in ten (9%) said they had seen something of a sexual
nature that made them feel uncomfortable, either online or on their mobile phone.”

Mentally scarring a pre-schooler (other studies asked younger) is nothing to mildly inconveniencing Sargon one bloody time.

If you wonder why soaps and TV are so bad, we removed restrictions on theatre, film and TV for (((no reason))). Covered that UK theatrical statute before, there’s a right not to see this shit. Or at least be warned, which current numerical guidelines do not (I want warning of full nudity and specific acts before paying to see it, as consumer choice).

There’s no such thing as a hooker, Sargon*, that’s what Rotherham social workers say when women and little girls are raped. The psychiatric outcomes of prostitutes have also been studied, there is no excuse for this with Muh Consent because consensus morality doesn’t exist, that’s moral relativist bullshit. Humans don’t have owners, even if you call it a ‘pimp’. Neither is a profession, sex slave owner or sex slave. It’s an affront to human dignity (illegal under the human rights you claim to know and love).

Filming it doesn’t make the situation acceptable, it’s up there with the theatre’s constant abuse of ‘nudity’ scenes**. If adult people wanted to put that adult material online, they’d do it for free! But why do the prostitution/white slavery rings want children to be able to view it?

It’s a good question, innit?

To groom the next crop of recruits. Children have no context to understand, dismiss or deny adult themes. Bobo dolls. They lack the brain development to question what they see, consider it normal and COPY IT.

*(who’s currently triggered at the prospect of protecting children from Silicon Valley pedos and protecting non-addicts by default)

**Apparently public nudity is illegal unless you’re charging and on a stage. WTF. That’s prostitution. This is why we censored productions. It isn’t art. We censor plenty of ‘art’.

other related info copied from

Sources, links and further reading: Rockefeller Foundation and Kinseyhttps://rockfound.rockarch.org/kinsey-reports This Is Why I Quit Porn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljBZ0_iNqrs&feature=youtu.be The Jewish Role in the Porn Industry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ Porn Sites Get More Visitors Each Month Than Netflix, Amazon And Twitter Combined (Dec 2017) https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/03/internet-porn-stats_n_3187682.html Pornhub wants to be your one-stop shop for sex ed (Feb 2017)http://college.usatoday.com/2017/02/02/pornhub-sex-ed/ Internet pornography by the numbers; a significant threat to society https://www.webroot.com/us/en/home/resources/tips/digital-family-life/internet-pornography-by-the-numbers How Does The Porn Industry Actually Make Money Today? AUGUST 11, 2017 https://fightthenewdrug.org/how-does-the-porn-industry-actually-make-money-today/ How the Internet Changed Porn September 12, 2017 https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/how-the-internet-changed-porn-w502441 Three in Traci Lords Sex Film Case Indicted, March 06, 1987 :http://articles.latimes.com/1987-03-06/local/me-5028_1_traci-lords Sugar and Spice and all things not so nice Garry Gross, Richard Prince and the story behind the Brooke Shields photograph (Oct. 2009) https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph Manwin Says Its Porn Business Is Legal Mar. 18, 2013 –https://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2235795190001/?#sp=show-clips Manwin takes over Playboy TV operations October 31, 2011 https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003713/http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2011/10/31/manwin-takes-over-playboy-tv-operations/ 7 of the most famous Jews in porn By Gabe Friedman June 12, 2015 https://www.jta.org/2015/06/12/news-opinion/the-telegraph/7-of-the-most-famous-jews-in-porn Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry https://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 Men’s testosterone levels declined in last 20 years https://uk.reuters.com/article/health-testosterone-levels-dc/mens-testosterone-levels-declined-in-last-20-years-idUKKIM16976320061031 A Population-Level Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels in American Men, January 2007 http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/92/1/196 Research related to women working in various aspect of the sex industry http://iamatreasure.com/about/stats/Pornography Stats 2013 (PDF) http://blog.clinicalcareconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/porn_stats_2013_covenant_eyes.pdf Sex, Lies And Statistics (Nov 2005) https://www.forbes.com/2005/11/22/internet-pornography-children-cz_sl_1123internet.html#6522094a51ba Want to Stop Sex Trafficking? Look to America’s Porn Addiction https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johnhenry-westen/want-to-stop-sex-traffick_b_6563338.html Why Consuming Porn Is An Escalating Behavior August 2017: https://fightthenewdrug.org/why-consuming-porn-is-an-escalating-behavior/ When a person is sexually aroused, it builds new brain maps for both what they think is sexy and what they expect from their partner.”James G. Pfaus, “Who, What, Where, When (and Maybe Even Why)? How the Experience of Sexual Reward Connects Sexual Desire, Preference, and Performance,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 41 (2012): 31–62. When adolescents, both male and female, are exposed to sexualized media, they are more likely to have stronger notions of women being sex objects. L. Monique Ward and Kimberly Friedman, “Using TV as a Guide: Associations Between Television Viewing and Adolescents’ Sexual Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Research on Adolescents 16, no. 1 (2006): 133-156. Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788 In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232). http://stakeholders. ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use- attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf.  Donna M. Hughes, “Sex Trafficking of Women for the Production of Pornography,” Citizens Against Trafficking (July 1, 2010), “If a trafficking victim is forced to engage in a sex act that is filmed or photographed for sale as pornography, then the production of pornography itself becomes a severe form of trafficking in persons that is subject to criminal liability.” Robert W. Peters, Laura J. Lederer, and Shane Kelly, “The Slave and the Porn Star: Sexual Trafficking and Pornography,” The Protection Project: Journal of Human Rights and Civil Society, Issue 5 (Johns Hopkins University: Fall 2012). The Porn Myth: Exposing the Reality Behind the Fantasy of Pornography (March 2017): https://www.amazon.com/Porn-Myth-Exposing-Reality-Pornography/dp/162164006X

Nurture theories clearly demonstrate that porn is propaganda. It changes the otherwise healthy way you view women, family, babymaking into Hollywood’s push for resentful soullessness. Why don’t Americans wanna breed anymore?

Brain damage during a closing window of critical biological development is abuse. If we let Google groom kids, we’re enabling child abuse. There’s no such thing as a free lunch or free porn. We know addiction operates by escalation, including, ironically, to watching child porn. What about other kids watching it, viewing the rape and molestation of other kids?

Nothing else permanently alters the brain like viewing sexual content. Even Peterson had to point this out.

It seems to be ruining T-levels in men but propping up Viagra sales! Great for the Israeli companies making it.

It’s the ultimate r-selection tool. I have a right not to be exposed by default, same with not tuning into the radio with the BBC blasting crappy rap songs, same with not attending strip clubs and massage brothels, same with public nudity being illegal because the public doesn’t wanna see it and same thing with needing to consent to pay and prove age to buy a cinema ticket to view what’s effectively a gradual push of softcore porn into even PG kid’s films.

Men realise porn weakens them

How much neuroscience did you need?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/these-college-guys-are-trying-to-ban-porn-on-campus

It’ll also put off SJWs from attending there.

The proposal is simple: Install a filter on the campus WiFi that bars access to all websites that exist for the purpose of disseminating porn. Notre Dame’s technology policy already bans accessing pornographic, sexually explicit, or offensive material on campus networks, but Martinson said he was shocked by the amount of support for a digital barrier. A petition in support of the measure was signed by more than 1,000 men and women—more than a tenth of the Notre Dame student body.”

I love Gen Z.

The men will also get higher grades as a result.

From YBOP’s research page

Collectively, these studies suggest that youth who consume pornography may develop unrealistic sexual values and beliefs. Among the findings, higher levels of permissive sexual attitudes, sexual preoccupation, and earlier sexual experimentation have been correlated with more frequent consumption of pornography….”

It drives r-selection in the addict.

Funny how the nurture people won’t admit the training effect of porn…

PornHub opened a shop

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-24/pornhub-erects-its-first-physical-retail-store-new-york-city

I would say we need a The Degeneracy Times e-zine to keep up with this shit, but The New York Times is basically already there.

Could men who know better stop being such degenerates please?

This is your fault.

In no other time period would this fly.

Historians will look back on us as worse than the Roman. We don’t have lead pipes as our excuse.

Video: Has porn caused weak men?

Yes.

That’s the brain reward of success and if you give it to losers…. they never try.

Except… it’s deliberate. Rat/lever studies. They keep pushing for the buzz instead of food and they die. Brainwashing/conditioning. Pigeons playing ping pong, google it.

yourbrainonporn.com

#1 resource to begin

You can be trained to respond to things that frighten you. This is established.
Cue record male infertility in the young, sapped hormonal systems (endocrine/adrenal) and since they get to you before your brain has matured to age of majority (this should be grooming and illegal) you can’t bond with women – which makes you a porn addict, you cannot be stimulated without it and real women (not the supernormal stimuli of fake surgery women wearing tons of slap) don’t feel as ‘good’.

Congratulations, you’ve ruined yourself on one of the best human experiences.
Not to mention, if you wanna marry and you’re Christian? That’s adultery. To look with lust in your heart, it’s right there. Protip: Any therapist who encourages you to watch porn? Run. It’s a top marriage killer. Remember: If you fixed all your issues, you wouldn’t come back to them.
Porn also teaches you to prefer voyeurism, making you a cuckold (cuckquean in women).

My heart really goes out to young men on this because porn is all your weaknesses combined.
At least make it illegal for minors to view (so you’d need a credit card just to sign up) and share.
That one small change would save millions. Men need physical succor like women do emotional, this connection is sacred or we’ll never get along.

Women don’t look like men, btw, it’s styling. Typical men now look like women (exception: high-testosterone, that’s rare and they’re usually lesbians anyway so who cares? Digit ratios.)
It’s long proven that feeding libido, especially in men, makes it rage harder. In short, your self-soothing, isn’t even soothing. You’re stacking up problems and damaging the delicate balance of your body’s micronutrients and motivation. Everyone knows male fluids contain a lot of good stuff – that’s less for your goals. This isn’t like emptying a battery to get a full charge later, you are not a radiator in need of bleeding, there is nothing wrong with being mildly aroused as the default it creates character in men and it’s the reason we have art.

They can keep you desperate and horny to sell you shit on credit. It’s a distraction, it’s faking a throw of a bone to a dog. You’re the dog.
They can keep your sexual response cycle frigid to normal stimulation and charge you for supplements and Viagra.
Conception is based only on the completion of the male cycle so this is totally anti-natal, against the nuclear family or any formation/maintenance thereof.

If you need porn to masturbate, there’s something wrong.
The porn sites have manipulated you into thinking you need them.
Imagination should be good enough, it also makes men naturally romantic.
It’s a gift.

They really are watching you

http://www.zdnet.com/article/snoopers-charter-expansive-new-spying-powers-becomes-law/

Rather than deport or hang the traitors, they’d rather put them up in better-than-hostel conditions on the taxpayer dime and spy on the independent-minded  common. Which is the public enemy here? The criminal or Joe Public?

Where are all the people who laughed at the Orwell comparisons?

The people saying nutjob? Conspiracy theorist? [as if various conspiracies didn’t turn out, in fact, to be true] and best of all, plain crazy?

Ah, I love me some sheltered liberal gaslighting in the morning. They try so hard to make the denial total.

If I won’t see it, you can’t see it either! – the very essence of anti-liberal censorship.
If you don’t want a conservative rally, don’t go to one.
If you don’t like guns, don’t get one.
If you like surveillance, hand your data over to the nearest officer personally.

oh really am I supposed to be scared angelina jolie wanted big man uhuh

LISTEN AND BELIEVE. THIS IS FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY. DISREGARD REALITY. DON’T TRUST YOUR LYING EYES. THE ADMINISTRATION IS ALWAYS GOOD. YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, DO YOU? IT’S A FREE COUNTRY.

I’m certain this won’t be used to spy on political enemies like the Gestapo.

Mind your thoughts, you might get arrested.

Whatever you do, Don’t mention the war Alt Right!

p.s.

And they’ll continue to claim they can’t do anything about children viewing porn.