Peterson memes and the myth of the individual

The Left can’t meme, holy shit.

It’s like a goth phase for degenerates.

He’s the dumb person’s smart person.
And the best meme is obviously this:

Show me IQ by sexual partners or STD history, Peterson.

http://highexistence.com/16-jordan-peterson-memes-made-clean-room-laughter/

How to spot a cult, this line:
“There are those on the inside who “get it” and those on the outside who don’t.”

The modern navel-gazer picks over Disney instead of the Bible.
“In his Maps of Meaning course he spends over 4 hours deconstructing the movie Pinocchio,

so intellectual

digging a latrine for four hours would be more useful

these people are allergic to manual tasks

they’d watch paint dry than do something with their hands

why doesn’t he teach you how to read research papers?

so you don’t have to rely on anyone’s interpretation?

(he doesn’t think you’re smart enough – and he’s right)

drawing from the cartoon profound insights about religion, myth, society, Marxism, psychology, and religion.”

Marxism, yay! Theft is so deep.
If you want to torture me, set me up Clockwork Orange style in front of someone pontificating about Disney for hours like it’s the Holy Grail.
This is what the SJWs did first. If you twist things for kids, you can brainwash them. It’s the lowest effort manipulation.
Remember when the edgy people used to hate psychology professors?
The field isn’t different. They still hate you.

I’ve written about the distraction on menial work before, typical cult.
Clean up your room?
Clean up your country.

Jesus didn’t tidy a hut.
“You stop doing things that make you feel weak and aim for making your life better.”
FEEEEEEELS.

REAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT MAKES YOU FEEL LIKE SHIT.

It doesn’t stop.

The funny part of a cult is how the members have total cognitive dissonance, demonstrated in zero self-awareness.
They couldn’t have wasted months watching shit on the internet (I know I do!), no, it has to be life-changing.
If it were true, the signal value would be bad.
Logically, it must be partially false to pass the censors.
Spiritual bypassing again. Addicted to superficial “improvement”. No use repainting the wall when the building is about to collapse.
Look at the simple conflict of “stay out of the mainstream, you’re so special just the way you are” against “Climb the dominance hierarchy”.
What if the system is corrupt? Why support it?
Ah, academic professor, that’s why. Teenagers will hate their parents, never their favourite teachers. And you wonder why so many abandoned kids are socialists. They never replace the teachers with robots for this reason, the real reason. They teach state loyalty with emotional abuse (since teachers are instrumental supports designed to induce obedience in the helpless and always leave).
The people you see on TV (Channel 4 interview) or at the top of Youtube are finger puppets.
The internet is one big Punch and Judy show.
The alt right collapsed when the drama!!!!!1! people came in and started trying to be celebrities constantly cat-fighting one another for attention supply and doing nothing productive. Actively halting productive conversations with gossip.
It’s just as bad as the Kardashian brothel.
However, this was gold. You can allow 1% lolz. It can’t be 99% what you do.

“In order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.”
Liars can use common sense, Satan can quote Scripture, Peterson can sound lucid for once.
He’s using the Rules for Radicals technique there, I think. Hoist them by their own petard, hold them to their own standard. SJWs offend everyone so are they also banned? We now have political classes … we notice because they’re in flux. Christians, white people and capitalists (right-wingers) used to be on the bottom of the heap and rise. The left, atheist crowd object to the change in status but can only make noise, having no logical grounding to prevent their slide down.
The end of that video is what I just described, she slides silently down, virtue signalling corrupted.

He didn’t say the best thing: the right to liberty involves risk. If someone disgusts you, you have the right to avoid them. Freedom of association keeps the peace. Emotional appeals have no logical or legal basis. Everyone has emotions. The truth will be the truth no matter what you or I feel about it, bring up Creationists and evolution. Denial has no right to be respected when an individual tries to force society to ignore evidence in biology. It’s ideological fascism.

You cannot outlaw risk, it’s a fact of reality and there is no such thing as a right to be coddled by others. Infantilization is wrong. Entitlement is toxic. Outrage begins within and it is abusive to ask others to regulate your own emotions when you choose to seek out ideas that anger you. It’s an anger management problem.

This is why they don’t let me on TV.

The Virgin/Chad thing was a cringe attempt of middle-class, spoiled American degenerates to pretend they have a conscience e.g. “saves Western civilization”, it actually says that. Next to “centrist” (cuck) and “Disney”. Just “Disney”. The left can’t meme, even when they’re pretending to be right e.g. “speaks the truth” is one “Chad” description. Find the average business major Chad at a festival and see how much shit they talk. They still listen to rap, FFS.
It’s embarassing.
The male equivalent of an SJW. Both are addicted to vice, an irrational sense of superiority from being degenerate, combined with intense emotions and without those intense emotions like a strong tap they collapse from withdrawal. Both are drama addicts.
These people are useless narcissists: http://highexistence.com/dark-side-of-following-your-dreams/

Both are movement poison, waiting for a powerful bandwagon to jump on.

A cuck will collapse (no conscience, nothing behind the verbal) and abandon your team as soon as you call them racist. Racist just means white person.

You can’t stop being white? It’s the white person’s “nigger”. Pets used to be called that with love, it had a variety of meanings. They’re so sheltered they don’t get that a word becomes its use and “racist” was a Marxist invention anyway; words can describe all sorts of things that don’t exist, you bloody unicorn. You don’t have to respect a thing because they made up a word for it, it’s linguistic intelligent design.

(If ID were true, genetic mutations wouldn’t exist, nor would genetic disease).

Denial doesn’t work. Reality exists!

The scientific use of it is a false flag to deplete attention away from the science per se.
The science is still there. DNA is on our side on this one. The word is in the long slow process of dying out among the ignorant who don’t believe in the science.

“Define who you are” – Peterson

oh but nationalism is bad?

Are you not your culture, Mr Myth Man?

Are you African culture too, with your globalism? Who’s your fave Orisha, Peterson? Or does he only study White culture? I’d like a comparison of Yemoja to Luna. Probability = 0.

(As you can guess, I could write a religion book better than Peterson and trust me, that isn’t saying much.. He doesn’t even mention The White Goddess book, haven’t seen it. It explains women in wheat fields as ancestral memory, imho. His view is narrow Greco-Roman Martian sensibility. Within the same pantheon and ignorance, at least appreciate Jupiter and Saturn!)

His lectures plot the same course of intellectual development for female students as male, that is a Gender Studies major’s wet dream.

And are you not beholden to your biology? Then you begin with huge limits e.g. IQ and true self-definition is a farce involving the long-dead American Nightmare.

“Strengthen the individual.” Fucking psychologists.
(They make more money treating 5,000 people for the same problem than telling them all at once and solving it forever. Remember that.)

I think, I drink, I judge.

If you’re new, welcome.

And if the given rationale for that particular mantra is to spare society the responsibility for individuals, that is the express purpose of authority (and taxation) and individualism is the enemy of nationalism. The basis of his brand of individualism cannot be nationalism (improving strength and potency of national symbols and culture). If it’s for the Greater Good of nation then why be opposed to nationalism, why not just skip to that bit?

LOGICALLY.

Save the nation, save all the individuals comprising it.

Any rebuttal? Anyone? If we’re shooting for pure utilitarianism… don’t be easy pickings.

The envious mob can chop up Hypatia. One great individual has no strength in a weak society that doesn’t deserve them.

It’s a myth of mere genius e.g. Galileo, that they cannot be murdered. A fairytale.

Fix the nation, correct the incentives or the tall poppies die and everyone else with them. Throughout history, they pluck off the “individuals” first. Divide and conquer.

What takes out your polymaths and geniuses will easily devastate the common herd.

You can have the tidiest room up to operating room standards and there are still invaders raping your little sister. Are you really a man?

They seek out myth because their life is a lie.

They seek out old culture in a grandiose pastiche because they are disconnected socially from the present and recent past (kin) and want the emotional boost of belonging like a drug without the duties to the in-group. His lectures go over well with kids because they’re dodging responsibility. It’s escapism.

They say they want “meaning”, they crave belonging.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudade
You miss your unique place that is your birthright.

I know this because I’ve been there, the same position as you fifteen years ago.
Don’t waste fifteen years reading myths thinking they hold a key to Atlantis.

To put it in terms a Peterson cultist would understand, meditate on this:

You’re still alienated, surrounded by Disney VHS tapes.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

Personal SHTF

The dependency network is interesting.

On the one hand, they shame you into getting 401ks, an IRA, ISA, “rainy day fund”, “emergency money”…

oh, but don’t you call it prepping!

I think it’s the mindset of fear against self-reliance.

If you learn too much independence as a citizen, including Fuck You money or untaxable savings (e.g. growing herbs and not buying), the fear vanishes. That fear is their power over you.

Our ancestors had freer speech because they had fuller wallets.

Why were women shamed for managing and working in the home? They couldn’t tax us. They couldn’t brainwash us. They couldn’t control us. Corporate laws in many ways act like an overbearing husband – turn up 9 to 5 even if you can do all the work 2-6.

Think of all the false economies of kicking women from their domain. Instead of one efficient, untaxable wife you need: cleaner, cook, nanny, builder, shopper, chauffeur, prostitute (theoretically)… Marriage is immensely efficient division of labour for both sexes, no wonder the Powers That Be try to make it seem like a bad deal.

The convenience economy relies on us: our dependence.

If we snapped back to 1900 levels of marriage by point of a shotgun, the economy would instantly depress – half the labour force, half the tax revenue and half the job opportunities at least. Supply/demand.

Everyone’s capable of common sense

“I suppose I meant love as in respecting someone as a full person, but thinking about it, you obviously don’t need love for that, since you can respect (and should respect) the people you hate. You can despise someone and still treat them like another human being.
Respect is not something which should only be given to those you love, nor should loving someone make lacking that respect somehow acceptable.
I probably should have worded my response better. What I meant was that respect is the very baseline of human decency, and without that, it’s totally beyond belief to try and pair two characters up and imagine that there could ever be mutual healthy love there.
When you love a person you love that person for who they are, not for who you want them to be, or who you think you can make them. You do not control them. You cannot force them to do anything against their will. You respect their independence and autonomy.”

Even SJWs.

They just suppress it.

Freedom for women without feminism

In brief, she argues that pushing women into jobs designed by and for men (a common attitude among feminists) is not the appropriate way to make use of the specific skills of women. On the contrary, it comes close to abuse. However, preventing women access to education and the professional world for reasons of alleged inferiority and limiting their social function to raising children (anti-feminism, Christian traditionalism) is not going to make anyone happy either. Mathilde proposed a third way, a different kind of traditionalism: for a strong “folk”, women must be given the opportunity to develop their personalities and creative skills properly so as to contribute to society in their own, uniquely feminine way. There should be a female contribution beyond motherhood, but it should be in harmony with a woman’s nature and her physical and mental make-up. Ludendorff counts intuitive cognition — i.e., psychological and holistic thinking — as among the most valuable skills of women that would complement the rationalistic, schematic tendency of the male intellect in a meaningful way.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/commemorating-mathilde-ludendorff-on-the-50th-anniversary-of-her-death/

applause clap clapping yes well done

Finally, someone who gets it.

Ignoring half of the population because they give birth is as silly as refusing to socialize with women on their period.
Anyone willing to contribute to the national good should be encouraged.

Rights and responsibilities will always be connected

Whoever pays for it.

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/maximum-freedom-maximum-responsibility.html

“Roosh’s theoretical advocation of rescinding the voting rights of unmarried parents would be equally lead-balloony as my advocation of the immediate elimination of all income transfers.  Not only is the cat out of the bag (in the fact it is no longer property owners who can vote), but society is so stupid we would both likely be accused of being “bigots” and “haters,” and ran out of town.  However, since this is all in “Shoulda Land” there is one more compelling reason humanity, no matter how long it is in the future, should never have their freedoms limited as opposed to their responsibilities fully enforced:

Who, precisely will determine what people are allowed what freedoms?”

People who can be bribed by corporations and bought with votes.

  1. It isn’t the child’s fault.
  2. Such lost children are caused by promiscuity culture. Nix the promiscuity culture and the quality of parenting improves.

There are good reasons to be an unmarried parent e.g. rape.
Feasibly, anyone who’s had premarital sex would be forced to marry their ONS if it resulted in pregnancy. No slutting.
Does Roosh really want that? Really? Really really?

Finally, a man who knows it was universal suffrage. Plenty in the manosphere act like if we rolled the clock back, they could still vote. Do you own property? Then no.

Women live longer, we inherit property.

“Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity.”
Robert A. Heinlein

This would mean men have to support the families they sire, you see, the people advocating responsibility like Roosh think it would only apply to those Meddlin’ Feminists. When he, for example, took a useless degree and warned others off it.

Hypocrites.

I do wonder where the genetic suicides expect the tax money will come to pay for their public pensions? Children were the historical pension. And tax-funded abortion clinics for any women they get up the duff? STD clinics from their weekend of partying?

I am totally on board with shaming men in their thirties who think it’s OK to act like teenagers. Could be anime toys or using aging terms like ‘bang’.

If you look at plenty of measures of recklessness, from car accidents to divorces, men are the more stupid sex. They take the most risks. So this might end up backfiring on the men who call for it (‘cept Aaron, he seems cool).

In every time period known to man, men had more responsibilities than women.

drinking lol glad that's not my problem haha