Link: Why we need eugenics

The founding stated purpose of the NHS was eugenic.
It isn’t what your history teacher brainwashed you.
Every celebrity sticking up for “healthcare” is into eugenics.
As long as the NHS pays for abortions and contraception.

Repeat abortions nursing article:

“there is a significant risk that the child would suffer physical or mental abnormalities leading to serious handicap”

Various conditions will disappear.

Important practical note:

Logically, you’d need proportionate eugenic policies to simply counterbalance the dysgenic ones, purely to even it out and start from neither. neutral position. Eugenic in this case is basically any policy that encourages healthy taxpayers to have more kids and raise them properly (that will also have better life outcomes and so on into prosperity via pursuit of individual happiness helped by the nation state they own, how terrible, right?). Dysgenic is whatever prevents this sustainable circle of life (holds aloft a lion cub) or more directly harmful, promotes ill-health and sterility in a population swayed by antisocial (punitive) policy changes. It’s technically dysgenic to promote the continuation of the “loser” lines of the outgroup too (keeping prisoners and slaves instead of killing them in war means eventually your kids will breed with them) but that’s also pathological altruism (classic empire suicide) and only formerly happened when a major war was lost and most of the healthy men were dead (conquest). Migration patterns is a PC way to say “conqueror boundaries”.

To promote continuation of another genetic line over one’s own isn’t merely genetic suicide and likely a form of madness (nothing in evolution accounts for this and it’s direct ingroup harm), it’s literally a spin on treason.

If the outgroup is so great, go live among them before “helping”.

Demographics matter. Biology matters. People’s personalities, including non-cognitive traits that affect life outcomes, are highly heritable. Specific pro-social temperaments conducive to civilization have been demonstrated to be genetically determined in animal studies with foxesand mice. In addition, all relevant identical twin studies have found that genetics accounts for at minimum 45% of the total variation in intelligence within populations. A significant portion of studies, notably including the most comprehensive ones, have estimated the genetic contribution to be between 70 and 80%. The heritability of intelligence has also been demonstrated in non-human primates.

IQ as a measure of intelligence and a predictor of positive outcomes has been demonstratedbeyond any shadow of doubt. Not only are those with high IQ more likely to have positive life outcomes on a personal level, but their efforts as a class contribute significantly more to the economic health and technological progress of civilization than the average or low IQ classes.

You want equal outcomes?
Start with equal contributions!

“They can’t”? Yeah, we know!

That is literally our point.

So who owes whom, considering the people who take more than they produce have the privilege of living off those other people already, purely for a coincidence of geography?
National socialism, right there. Producers enslaved to consumers, seems temporary.

They complain about The Rich but never want to kick the Russians out of London, do they?
Then it’s lachrymose Guardian pieces blithely bemoaning why property is so expensive.
Putin kicked those corrupt Russians out and you wanna keep them? WHY?

The only Russian collusion is with real estate agents.

IQ is so important to civilization, in fact, that the relative wealth of a country can be accurately predicted from average IQ*. Intriguingly gains that result from increasing intelligence do not suffer from the law of diminishing returns. Therefore, the relative fertility of high intelligence vs. low intelligence people has significant implications for the evolution of civilization and humanity…..

Evolution is ongoing remember.

Incentives make societies based on their priorities and values, punitive sanctions on health and markers of prosociality e.g. income tax paid, decay the society of envy.

The politics of envy end in death. I guess it’s the sociopath’s way to prevent ‘suffering’.

I feel like the only person to notice how America’s hand-wringing guilt over its “evil” supposedly ‘eugenic‘ sterilizations of the grossly dependent went without mention during the unusual boom times a generation plus afterward. The same prosperity occurs after the natural culling effect of major disease outbreaks. This happens everywhere.

Black Death > Boom, Renaissance


4-point shitstorm

I keep seeing broad predictions of no practical use.

Note: this is the shortest timeline, as soon as possible.

More useful is to understand how a process can unfold.

Based on history, here is how any Trouble would likely arise.

  1. A big flagship company (e.g. Tesla) would be subject to market forces and tank. Economy would get shitty for a while. It could be a national thing in the international banking system e.g. Venezuela, Italy using its guns to defend its culture and the collapse of the EU – same result from black swan.
  2. The economy would get shittier after a numb time of optimism and market shock because the same con artists are in charge while most flee to Israel, Russia, bunkers, whatever. Internet and other communications would go down and we rely on those for news. People would bank run, making it worse. Banks would close, a few minor attacks on bankers. Public workers lose money, including police. Loyalty becomes frayed. Margin call, Universities lose bargaining power. MSM flails like a dead fish.
  3. The infrastructure would crack and reveal the rotting crumbling edifice propped up fiat fake fun money e.g. pension funds go, NHS implodes, EBT crashes, nuclear power meltdowns, EMP from piss-taking panicking China maybe. A lot of basic functions would go to shit. Big one? FOOD SECURITY. Starts all riots.
  4. Still entitled, many groups would expect special treatment. Being thieves, that’s when your violence and civil wars would start. WW3 would likely be a WorldWide Civil War.

Timeline, depends on bailouts, to be perfectly honest.

I didn’t think so much QE was possible.

Some countries might opt to default early e.g. Italy, to save themselves at the expense of the system that screwed them with odious debt.

2019-2021, previously mentioned by me. I predicted by 2022, much will have changed about the basic ways the world operates. Much of it worse but more principled, maybe?

I can’t discuss rebuild before the tower falls.

Again, predicting something isn’t the same as wanting it to happen.

In 2019, stock volatility of Stage 1. Speed of progression after that hard to say.

I doubt there are enough high IQs in the Valley to operate out of such a mess.

These people got paid in stock.

And electronic, not emergency TP.

Could be wrong but I’ve called a lot of things before. The timeline is blurry because I’m honest.

I can’t say, ah, it’s September 3rd, 2019, can I?

January 25 2020.

August 12 2020.

April 18 2021.

There are simply too many factors.

It won’t be 2030 though, Vox. I know that.

(No, I’m not hinting those dates).

Paper: Population cycles and dysgenic collapse

PAPER HERE (2007).

Prosperity > Moral decline > Decay > Decadence > Virulence > Decline > Collapse > Ruin

You are ——————————————————————————–^ HERE.

50s                       60s             70s        80s                   90s           00s                  2020+

Many institutions are failing, but the “collapse” per se is when this state of fact suddenly hits public awareness and becomes undeniable, it will seem like a flood all at once.

We’re the Titanic passengers who see a trickle of water. That shouldn’t be there.

WW1 killed us. Metaphorically, we got on the boat and abandoned class and character.