The 40 year lag

I find it funny when men complain about an issue with women that applies to men.

Especially so when it applied to men first, applies to men worst and caused the social acceptability among women.

There is, give or take, around a forty-year lag between any social poison perpetrated by men and taken up over time to reach a similar mass in women, the max among that sex who are interested. Hypocritical men suddenly notice and disapprove.

A few examples, you can think of your own.

James Bond playboy culture ~ approx 1965.

Sex and the City/Hook-up culture ~ 2005.

College is the key to a good job ~ 1970.

Everyone goes to college ~ 2010.

Men party, sleep around and shirk consequences ~ late 1920s.

Women party, sleep around and get abortions ~ 1960s-70s.

Men vote for socialism ~ 1870s

Women vote for socialism ~ 1910s

Men want free stuff from the Government on a welfare state ~ 1910s

Women …. you get the picture, don’t you? ~ 1950s.

This is an interesting time range.

e.g. In Stefan’s recent video

Mid-Late 1910s – USD over-takes GBP, takes all the gold too.

Late 40s, Early 50s – USA spends all the gold, shortly comes off Gold Standard (70s). Practically one bubble every decade hence up until now when there’s no more money printing left (called it!)… America due to be ruined by petroyuan in 3, 2, 1…

[I called that too, about seven times.]

1970s obese men become normalized.

2010s fat acceptance movement in women.

1960s Beetle mania, Elvis, rock stars

2000s Reality TV and fake celebrities

1870s Victorian attire for men loses formality with each decade here on out, for convenience and health.

1910s women start loosening the corset and shortening hemlines so they don’t fall over. Exercise takes off.

1880s male crossdressing, theatrical make-up acts and BDSM in Europe.

1920s – female crossdressing, androgyny, make-up and sexual (sometimes lesbian) parties

1930s alcoholic men

1970s women begin to drink like men

1940s brotherhood social clubs

1980s sisterhood and shoulder pads

1970s Civil Rights movement among mostly black men

2010s Black women do not shut up about social justice and intersectionality.

1980s not getting married starts to lose stigma and social shame.

Close to 2020, the general consensus seems to be more shame for getting married.

1970s no-fault divorce? multiple marriages take off

2010s everyone divorce, cohabitation (living in sin) takes off

1960s Men: too many people is bad for the environment.

2000s Women: too many white babies is bad for the environment.

In at least 9/10, men started it. Men could finish many social ills, they don’t want to.

40 years is just long enough for it to feel fresh and daring again because everyone forgot the first time.

1980: you’d have to be an idiot not to invest in the stock market!

Now: you’d have to be an idiot not to invest in bitcoin!

A good way to predict the next decade is what themes happened 25-35 years ago.

Posting is gonna be patchy, I’m running out of content recently. Not much good going on.

Quotes on women and misogyny

Warning: food for thought.

I was deeply dissatisfied with my final post of the year and figured I’d slapdash together something that is more intellectually stimulating, in a similar vein. It’s only mildly controversial if you’re interested in labels over substance.

“When women act like women, they are accused of being inferior. When women act like human beings, they are accused of behaving like men.”

Does that sound like a healthy civilization with any longevity?

What happened to all the meritocratic arguments to incentivize contributions in capitalist theory?

So we can accept racial differences and class differences and national differences and age differences but sex differences you can prove in a scanner or under a microscope are evil (well if God made…) and we must all be the same (the male standard is also shit) in misery and behavioural equality, the neuroscience be damned? Is that the world you want, putting power trip fantasies aside?

No society with catch 22s will survive, let alone thrive.
There must be two paths: to do, and to not do. There must be clear praise and condemnation and no blurring between those paths. No muddying the waters or blurring it for certain people. Either a thing is right or wrong, unless you are a moral relativist and then you believe in neither, for they’re absolute concepts.

The logic between sexes must be consistent also, it is no more right for a woman to steal than a man (Ten Commandments shout-out). It is no more moral for a man to assault, as they do, mathematically. Naturalistic fallacy is not an excuse, we are all biological and still retain the human quality of impulse control.

At the least, we ought.

We can uplift both sexes in a society without oppressing anyone. The technology exists now, where most of us can probably live in leisure most of the week. If we discussed it and developed it, i.e., cooperated together for mutual betterment! Where did you get the idea oppression has limits? It can’t be historical… Wealth is the hard cap but aside from that, men won’t be spared the same societal factors women would live under.

e.g. Employed singles of either sex still pay for the living of feckless breeders and the spawn without limit.

Misogyny is prominent when rich men wish to evade their intrasexual responsibilities and do so by blaming the women.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/12/10/da-wimminz/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/12/12/a-post-about-truth/

You can’t appreciate your fellows? Well, we don’t have a future then. Darwin always wins, darlings. Think of the tribe, we are not atomized, lonely individuals like the 20th century tries to force down our throats.

Where it exists, oppression spreads. Sadists work that way. It’s a betrayal whoever is on the receiving end, these circumstances predate our birth. Nobody living is fully responsible for this system, another red herring.

If we spent a little of our time wasted on the Third World that doesn’t want to change on improving our own lot, imagine what could be achieved. Immigration and multiculturalism are a deliberate ruse to throw off our resources, especially time, into establishing what used to be a norm. We’re stuck playing catch-up and tempers fray, stressed we lash out at the in-group, worsening our collective condition. It is no coincidence we replaced child labour with female. The economy will take its pound of flesh, I suggest we do robots instead of adult people. Society cannot ever again be ignorant of the female potential exemplified around the 1940s but bursting in brief lights long before. Can we afford to turn away our own kin for something minor as not being exactly like the current leaders, who, by the way, are clearly doing such a bang-up job of running things, aren’t they? /s

Do the foolish deserve to fail in any good society? How to deal with their complaints?
Failing men (and women) will complain about it. They’ll say the competition is wrong.
Obviously they will, never before have the dregs had such a loud voice. Nobody else has time to protest that much or write such long blog posts. ~glances at viewer and nods~ The antisocial and envious must be constrained from infecting everyone else like the emotional vampires they are.

They live better than Henry the Bloody Eighth. Prisoners do too. We are the grandiose brats of modern history. To compare farther back is sickening.

Again, there is no need to ban the un-competitive, they simply fall away in a fair contest. It’s obscure to claim a barrier, arbitrarily, in equal opportunity theory, either they misunderstand it or argue in bad faith.

Good for whites, bad for whites, you all say? We have a word for it, prosocial or antisocial. Use the proper terms, the Left will not. Accuracy is our strong suit.

If you only read male philosophers, sorry, but you haven’t read the subject. This isn’t like novels where they’re basically all the same, you get a pass on that for preference. Still, I didn’t skip out on male poets because that would’ve been sexist, you should be fascinated to hear the other side of humanity to which you may never belong. Unless a person really can change their sex? ….Thought not.

Violent crime statistics. MRI studies of psychopathy. Appeal to history (which cannot be demonstrated when called upon, because it never existed in fact, it was a helpful societal myth from around the Enlightenment era). Concepts like Patriarchy are unfalsifiable both ways. However, when I see Husband Selling like they’re subhuman chattel, I might believe in a Matriarchy. If you whine, do it with a smidgen of self-awareness?

Freud Freud Freud Freud Freud Freud Freud and a little bit of Nietzsche.

If you had a loving wife and children, you wouldn’t feel the need to rage at wombs.

#wombenvybites

Do you want us to try equally hard (effort) or are we allowed to be lazy, pick ONE.
Don’t give us shit for doing as you asked us to…?

That left-side of the bell curve… we all have stories, men don’t really think twice about it though. The sexual prevalence of obnoxious people doesn’t strike them, which is convenient and annoying.

Maybe we need studies.

They don’t even notice the abundance of Men Doing Stupid Shit stories in the newspapers, it’s like a goldfish noticing water. You don’t get to pin a badge on your chest reading Accomplished because you have a Y-chromosome. Arrogance is a male quality in all the myths for a reason, men over-estimate themselves in studies vastly more frequently. Arrogance is not esteem, far from it, nowadays it’s called narcissism. Men need to be the slightly simpler sex, because otherwise they’d have never taken the stupid risks to survive once kicked out of the tribe at the time they hit majority age (otherwise incestuous rape with female relations was a possibility, plus they needed to find a mate by travelling to other local tribes and passing their tests). Shall we bring back that rite of passage, if we want strong men again? You can’t have strength of character without the fatally high stakes that turn boys into men. Courage and stupidity are blurred but while shouting about the former, they literally deny the latter…. which rather suffices to prove our point.

Relevant so included. The mediocre ones are easier to control/rescue from life-risking stupidity that ends up ruining your whole family along with their misplaced sense of arrogance. Other men used to check them in youth but that isn’t happening soon. Average evolved as a sexual preference.

Original form of “the map is not the territory”.

It’s strange they’ll go on about Rand but only the economics and ignore De Beauvoir’s existentialism.
By strange I mean completely intellectually dishonest.
Arguments from bad faith, a certain moral cowardice common in young men at present.
Maybe some slice of laziness where they assume there’s nothing worth reading, but recall, they aren’t misogynists, somehow…
Well, if that prejudiced disdain of anything female isn’t a misogynist, what is?
She pre-empted Dawkin’s Selfish Gene: “Life is occupied in both perpetuating itself and in surpassing itself; if all it does is maintain itself, then living is only not dying.” If you care so much for truth, why not credit? It’s also a sweeping condemnation of hedonism.

If quoting a woman makes you feel insecure, women aren’t the weaker sex.

A little on metrics before I go.

Once the priming effect and other systemic, proven problems in all academic testing are accounted for, women are beginning to score objectively better than men on the blind-marked IQ test.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2174528/Yes-women-higher-IQ-men-thats-Ill-make-prediction-enrage-them.html
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it. HBD doesn’t tell you what you like, it tells you what is possible.
The narrow definitions of IQ have never been legitimate, and this goes for verbal, for instance, that women score better on overall. It’s a global metric of all-round functioning as ‘g’ or invalid to be counted as the theoretical construct.

IQ is originally a learning ability test and since learning requires obedient following of instructions, you would expect women to do better on it. Learning is feminine-oriented, as an activity. It isn’t a marker of human superiority the way America has tried to make a genius idolatry a form of hero worship over Hollywood. There are no ‘celebrities for smart people’, scientism is old. The Hollywood people actually have to do something – other than exist?
Paper genius is bullshit. They sell the official piece of paper to ditzy parents.

However, IQ and other metrics correlate to life outcomes, it is useful scientifically.

Identification (with celebrities) should inspire you to act, not live vicariously like a stage Mom but claiming involvement in the glamours of STEM work (anyone can get involved, go clean test tubes).

Wilson: “And a second very big question is, since, women are as intelligent as men, or more so, why did feminism take so long, historically, to get started?”

That one is easy, compulsory schooling about 150 years ago, universities places about 60-80 years ago, in living memory women were forbidden from competing fairly. He goes on to make the classic error of assuming men haven’t changed too. They don’t try at school, porn is a distraction during school years and schools are mixed when evidence says that reduces scores. A blend of exam and coursework is best, not to avoid favour – although this too – but because the more metrics of knowledge, the better the qualification in the market.

And isn’t that the point? These aren’t vanity academics.

Boys were pulled off the farms in the middle ages in the first schools, same boom of intellectual achievement happened then too… since it pre-empts the mythical Enlightenment time period, atheists do not wish to discuss that priests might’ve done something right, to the collective denial of male work ethic and social mobility. The middle class sprang up and families were liberated.

Simone on the decline:

“Whatever the country, capitalist or socialist, man was everywhere crushed by technology, made a stranger to his own work, imprisoned, forced into stupidity. The evil all arose from the fact that he had increased his needs rather than limited them; . . . As long as fresh needs continued to be created, so new frustrations would come into being. When had the decline begun?

The day knowledge was preferred to wisdom and mere usefulness to beauty. . . . Only a moral revolution – not a social or political revolution – only a moral revolution would lead man back to his lost truth.”

You don’t read this stuff, you are cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Remember the original feminists objected to the idea that former slaves would be treated better than them, relatives of the men drafting the laws with demonstrable intellect and accomplishments. It has a history soaked in race realism. We can pick and choose the structures from history that suited us best then and apply now. Nobody is doing this. The scientific approach. Machiavelli would be disappointed.

I hope Odin brings you plenty of shiny Asian-produced crap this year.
It’ll break by February, much like my patience on the topics that are life/death to conceited white people. We are all human and all flawed and all riding in the same, sinking boat.

This is a post I’m proud of.

xoxo

p.s.

“Like all dreamers I confuse disenchantment with truth.” Sartre, her lover.

Video: Why aren’t young people breeding?

Survival.

You know the migration patterns in disaster movies when all the scenery is silent, dead silent? Some nerd points out they migrated south early to avoid the shitstorm?

Look at the demographics of a nursery sometime.

Well, Europeans are at replacement rates. K-types only replace under ideal conditions, let alone these. We don’t need more of us than carrying capacity of this cold clime. It’s the only sustainable continent. We adopted the EU to avoid war aka mass die-offs of those K-children. A century ago, I read we were a third of world population. I need to have stats on that, can’t find them online.

What’s more likely in a family?

Family A has 2 children, working parents.

Family B has 4 children, parents don’t work.

Which are likelier to survive civil war and famine and disease that follows?

Without considering lifestyle and overall fitness. I covered before how Western diets fuck over non-whites the most by fattening them up, clogging up arteries with food they never evolved for. You don’t see many thin Indian men outside of India.

Disease is important because humans are vectors and the more dense the group the faster the spread – note plague transmitted with the shipping trade opening up and syphilis with the navies and soldiers away from home bringing it back after a war for bankers and politicians. Boys will be boys, say, why is infant mortality so high? They killed their own kids. Genetic STDs are the male abortion. Men seeking to conceive are only required to stay pure in lifestyle habit, as long as possible, i.e. ideally you never smoke, it keeps the genome purely replicated in the testes. It’s the one job they have and they literally fuck it up. Why are so many retarded kids being born to degenerate or aged fathers? It’s a mystery! Don’t insist they get neutered, fight for their right to party! I’m sure women won’t want the same… but say, don’t they need someone to be fucking with?
Free sex for everyone and when they turn out to be awful spouses and terrible parents because their pair bonding is also psychologically damaged, we blame iPhones!

Could it be social technology? Maybe.

Respect your elders, even when there’s nothing to respect!
Cities are pits of disease, and medicine is failing us. There was a temporary boom and now we don’t even have food security because post-war it is SO SO cheap to import and those big shipping tankers will always be available, right? You’d bet your life on it. We don’t carbon tax them properly despite being the largest transporters by mass (calculate it) and fuel wastes away because there’ll always be more oil… far, far away. You can just grow local. Now the West has less food security than Africa. Africans pluck food off trees that grow anyway. Our trees don’t do that. Most of our plants are poison.

Look at Gen Y/Z attitude surveys with all this in mind.
It suddenly clicks into place.

We see ourselves being replaced and it’s a stalemate, a game of survival chicken. See which strategy outlasts the other. Do you think JK Rowling is gonna hand over her properties or money to Muslim ‘refugees’ if the Government checks stop coming? But they’ll go after her, won’t they? Because she’s ‘kind’… and unarmed.

They imported the immigrants to ‘save’ them, so we don’t have to.
We can just turn their cucking asses around and point them in the direction of the nearest mosque. I’m sure they’ll show mercy to the people who surrendered their country.

Much of this process is unconscious, it’s a gamble but a reasoned one.

Young people know there are fertility treatments.

That’s insurance. IVF produces twins. There’s your K-strategy replacement.
The high IQ don’t need to reproduce fast unless they’re directly competing with r-neighbours, who, vitally, produce more. This used to occur in farming families. Modern r-types are weakened, they produce nothing of lasting value. The type to eat the seed crop, the grasshopper actually dies in most versions of the story.

We’re waiting for the Boomers to die off and their entitlement with it.

We’re waiting for the correction that follows. Cheap everything because shit, a huge segment of the population demand is literally rotting in the street (no kids to bury them, no one to care, probably getting eaten by the tribal eaters who moved in recently.) Their corpses will be easy to kick for what they did and easier to rob. Cadavers can’t protect their assets. For example, if an r-type took a property, they would keep it only a year or so. Like the houseproud Indians with spotless homes but garbage-mountain streets in front of the door because it’s communal, they don’t really care about their environment, they care for their comfort. Properties require between 1-5% maintenance costs per annum. How many house buyers know that fact? We only need to watch the gang war kill them, various diseases, like locusts they’ll strip their areas of food and the petrol tanks will rust. How many Asian mechanics are there? How many make do and mends? How many repair stuff instead of tossing it as junk?

At worst, we can scavenge and fix and crucially, improve. With those huge families of hundreds of cousins, they won’t last long because in a famine, most mouths to feed makes you all angry, on top of starvation hunger which is where you eventually eat your own brain. This takes a couple of weeks, a month tops. Rats eat their young. Starving people suffer diseases easily, then psychosis and breakdown, utter weakness. Feeble, helpless, like an 80yo. I fear many will regret moving to a hardy climate. Our birds get hungry. The foxes will nip you if you’re totally healthy and sleeping rough. Feel glad we shot most boar, bears and wolves. People’s pets will also be feral under those conditions.

Hell is cold, heat generates life and food. You’d be better off in rural India. I don’t pick on them, it’s just the largest demographic of immigrants are from there. They will regret it, based on these facts.

What if they’re conscripted into the EU army huh? That Indian passport would get a lot of use. This would go down well.

A couple of generations ago Brits built Anderson shelters in their garden. We hunker down and survive. Collectivist cultures died with plague. You won’t kick out grandma showing symptoms? Congrats, everyone gets a free visit from Mr Reaper this week.
A reverence of useless eaters mean you all get to die in a famine. At least nobody was offended. You died with the honour of knowing Malthus and Darwin, two pesky white guys, predicted this long before you had a chance to argue with it.
People ran into the forest to avoid disease. I don’t see many non-whites doing that. Just a feeling. https://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2009/08/14/128-camping/

You don’t see many other continents with that spirit, it evolved for our climate. Imagine if this goes down in winter, they become human popsicles. They live in diverse areas, anything of value will be robbed since they can only travel on foot. This can happen shockingly quick, it’s a case of waiting out that time calmly as much as possible, power-flushing the human dregs (crime bosses) and then rebuilding so it never happens, ever again.

Speaking of crime bosses, these dumb motherfuckers shoot precious ammo into the air like it grows on tropical trees. Which race was well-known for its blacksmiths and to this day has essentially the only really archaic knowledge of how to hand-make this stuff?

Which policies are required to rebuild (nation)?
We should be asking this.

It’s a lot of work, I know. But if/when this happens, your time will mostly be taken up with not dying or being attacked and eating. You need the high-minded stuff now.

“don’t worry, be a dummy” is spot on.

As I said in Best Post, the young are on strike, we’ve gone Galt. We work overtime but rent, avoid big ticket expenses (actually maintenance costs, things you own own you) and look out for a small circle.
We know we’re not gonna be rock stars to paraphrase Fight Club and why support people who owe us nothing for it? Where’s the noblesse oblige? You even find this on the Left – why pay for faith schools? Why can’t you just tax the rich until there are no rich people and then we pull solutions out of our bleached arseholes?

It will be funny to see when the teachers and police can’t retire. Low IQ with no soldier’s patriotism. There will be riots. Politicians and civil servants take care of their own.

Every mob has the same rallying cry: FREE SHIT FREE SHIT FREE SHIT FREE SHIT.

The refugees barging into towns like Vikings? They weren’t mass-slaughtered by the smarter tribe due to fear of the law. What happens when there is no law?

Diversity + Proximity = War

Who will survive? Well, who owns the means of production?

Marx wasn’t wrong about everything. However, having the factory is nothing if you can’t work it.

If you’re a woman and your man cheats, that child won’t survive. You can’t even support it on one parent’s full time working income. His priorities left and you’d better have family nearby. If that child cries when there are gangs of rapists riding around, you’re fucked.
Where was the rape hysteria in white women, before multiculturalism?
It’s generational, everyone feels it.

Read: Sir Glubb’s The Fate of Empires

How this isn’t better-known I do not know.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-2F_iHS6BLtGJb2ad
It’s short.
26 pages short.
I must admit my own stupidity because I wondered in a quiet moment, why is nobody citing this? I assumed I’d already linked to it and like Camp of the Saints, it should be popular. Searched, nothing.

Ah.

Final page, for those who wanna know.

And now they cry!

“And now, they find their Day is over! their power gone! and the throne of this nation possessed by a Royal, English, true, and ever constant member of, and friend to, the Church of England! Now, they find that they are in danger of the Church of England’s just resentments! Now, they cry out, “Peace!” “Union!” “Forbearance!” and “Charity!”: as if the Church had not too long harboured her enemies under her wing! and nourished the viperous blood, till they hiss and fly in the face of the Mother that cherished them!”

No Gentlemen, the Time of Mercy is past, your Day of Grace is over, you should have practised Peace, and Moderation, and Charity, if you expected any yourselves.

Source?

British Literature 1640-1789: An Anthology, pp. 370.

I meditate on this whenever an enemy of progress gets too big for their boots and feigns umbrage, especially the Muslims. Especially the Muslims.

The author in particular is Defoe.

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Shortest-Way_with_the_Dissenters