But that would save civilization

Trust r-types to come up with the best anti-dysgenics plan yet, out of an attempt at humour.

You take the bullets out of the gun before you wave it around, rather than covering everyone in Kevlar, logically.

Finally, a rite of passage I could get behind.

The financial and social burdens (approval) to enter matrimony used to put a damper on bad unions so a more technical approach must be considered. If you’re so alpha, why be concerned you won’t pass the fitness tests? The MRAs could be happy no fiendish, evil woman would sperm rape them, no more ghetto, no more alimony, everybody’s happy!

Literally 100% of women would endorse this plan, unless they’re spermjackers.

Seriously, all women would endorse this, unless parasitic. Only the reproducing rapists of men would disagree too. It literally cannot go tits up, my dudes. Think of the savings in the welfare system, for starters. That’s less tax necessary right there. Fewer screaming future criminals born into the world. Imagine the triggering of the Left at having no victim class to lord it over, no dysfunction sociologically. Instead, we nip their future voters in the bud, an existential genocide. They wanted to be replaced, right? CALL THEIR BLUFF. Pay all men a bonus of 10k to get it done upon 18 (and possibly to avoid the draft). Seriously. And get check-ups to ensure it holds. We’d end poverty overnight! The biggest predictor of poverty is premature parenthood! They can fund a future and have better odds of marrying well then too. Everyone wins!

Most Boomers wouldn’t exist if abortion laws weren’t brought in by them, but some years earlier. The hippies would’ve killed themselves. As the hippy mutates in every generation, imagine they just… stop. No oops babies for the manosphere to fake cry about. Everybody wins! It’s like our version of the Spartan selection. All you have to do is prove you’re not a fuck-up. Anyone with an IQ above a hundred can do that, if they choose. Imagine that culture of duty and honour. (fans self) It’s anti-Idiocracy. Galton would approve. All child related welfare would end overnight, including the immigrant breeding competition. The rationale of war widows is long gone. You chose to wed, you chose to bred, you can fund them all by yourselves instead. Therefore, the ‘anti-racists’ should logically support a move that quells anti-immigrant sentiment, by treating them like responsible adults. Spread your seed, pay to breed. Children are the ultimate luxury expense.

However, this would only work if ALL unmarried men had to do it (and already-married men also had to pass the tests of basic stability, mentally and financially). We don’t live in a tribal society anymore, solutions must be sweeping. Since men don’t carry the babies in this species, there’s no issue with medical side effects (and extraction under local is possible). Test all children at birth for paternity, publish the results in a public database and the system is rock-solid, all married men have assurance (or shame). If a married man sires a child adulterously, it’s easy to prove (paternity fail) and he is legally forced to get the snip-snip (a stigma and deterrent) and his wife can sue for the adultery (illegitimate children presenting a legal threat to their pre-established contract, maintaining the Biblical sanctity of the marital union in culture and encouraging women to marry out of this sense of safety). It’s a perfect system where everyone is kept honest. I think even MGTOW could agree to this. The problem genes in the species would die out. Degeneracy would disappear, gradually receding into small pockets over time until it went extinct entirely. It used to be underground and controlled for a reason. Rapists would fail in their strategy of stealing reproduction as a choice from women (so most rape would not happen, contra Freud’s blatantly dishonest assertions) or be easily caught. The moral culture would be gentrified and entitled parents would no longer exist because conception is not an accident. Most mental illness would also vanish. What is the downside? The Pill has already partially accomplished this, e.g. gay guys complain the gay ‘community’ is shrinking because many r-women who’d produce them are functionally infertile – but women aren’t responsible for the main r-strategy, literally called sneaky fucker in evobio literature. It’s the young dumb, and full of cum demo of low IQ men. We all know it.

Do you want to play Russian Roulette with the species?

The Pill damages women’s fertility in the long-term (look at gen X and IVF) and they’re giving it out to minors like smarties, for a long term use its inventor advised against, so this flip is really the only responsible solution. Surgical solutions on women would impair childbearing ability. This way would kill postmodernism forever, while allowing superficial bread and circuses to soothe the unfit (to be parents). It’s heavily patriarchal and gives men all the social power while allowing the cream to, er, rise. And replicate. Men improve as a group, genetically. Stupid women go barren as the viable men don’t want them. Women cannot deceive men as to their intentions. Women are respected as babymakers, but in a way we’d all agree with – protectively, no toxic pill chemical expectations poisoning our womb all because men can’t ice themselves for one afternoon. It isn’t like it’s every month for a week, is it? As Nature/God’s design intended, before the Industrial Revolution screwed us all over as a species with urban IQ shredders. There are also fewer great beauties among women because modelling and marrying with the Pill took them out of the breeding population, this would encourage those women back, with enhanced status to viable men and grant prestige amongst women. Women would get more feminine and beautiful as a sex, because all women have a natural desire to reproduce (conscious or not) and modern men pretend we don’t (to their own demise, sometimes). Easy sex has meant the ugliest women could breed, this reverses that trend. Forever. Natural selection of unfit female genes would thereby be restored, without reversing advances in gynecology. Femcels would actually exist and the baby rabies motive in the most rabid of SJWs would be laid bare for all of society to see. It would be undeniable and the power balance, interesting to see. If you only got it reversed to get married, divorce rates would plummet because the husbands would all be mentally stable, capable of leading strong families.

Again, marriage used to connote this filtration purpose – for MEN. By withholding their paternity for a woman who is worthy, wife material. Think about it.

In reality, looks and IQ correlate. And what man doesn’t want wide hips?

Hoes would need to work in Costco. Imagine it. You say muh female accountability and responsibility sure, but the only way to en-FORCE is to impose it, since women are the passive sex in the species and mirror changes in men with a brief time delay e.g. hyper sexual culture. You cannot affect change in women without first changing all men. It’s biologically impossible. This is genius. Smarter people on average by default. As national IQ rises, so does national GDP and life outcomes of the citizenry. There is no downside unless you’re a spiteful mutant.

As a society, we need to stop acting like women get themselves pregnant. It’s a curious, irrational mental block in the chain of biological causation. It’s such an elegant solution I had to post.

There is literally no downside to that plan. We clearly need a synthetic fitness test to match our synthetic era. Begin with a countersignal, it’s brilliant! It’s hilarious this is horror dystopia to a guy who will clearly never convince a woman to reproduce with him by conscious selection. It culls only r, who hate kids anyway. We’re sparing children abusive, ‘permissive’ parents and it’s 100% Biblical (the connection to God shown by the men, who might do an Onan with their own wife – this avoids that, it gets reversed to get wed – beautiful!). We’d stop seeing atheist couples treat matrimony like a narcissistic party with no fruitfulness (DINKs). Pretty much only conservatives would breed, and seeing as how partisanship is mostly genetic in studies, the Left would be dead. If neocons were smart, they’d come up with this stuff. Appeal to the high time preference by encouraging their genetic suicide tendencies. The political centrists have already Pilled themselves out of existence (a chemical abortifacient, see above – the Pill replicates the miscarriage effect of endometriosis, it’s secretly evil) but men shagging women on it never considered themselves responsible for potential abortion (unlike God). Two absolute facts (common sense) of any high IQ civilization: 1. Men are responsible for their seed, not women. 2. The Pill gave women too much power, I said it. Short of banning it, because you’re all the real pussies here, this evens the odds and feminists couldn’t complain because mens’ body, their choice to breed, since if all men got it by law there’d be no more sneaky fucker strategy, no alphas ripping the rest of you off (see seduction law for how that turned out, America) nor paternity issues with random cads concerning married men – also women couldn’t bitch about side effects, there’d be no need to take it without genuine medical requirement. It spares women suffering, including rape babies! The feminists should be cheering this on! The only valid reason for abortion -barring a fluke fatality risk- would disappear overnight. SHOW ME THE DOWNSIDE HERE, SJWs.

nb Men would have all the power in courtship again but no manwhores could complain because they’re freer than before!

If society wishes to treat fertility like a medical pathology, let’s be reasonable.

The fallacy of poor analogy where a fuck-up of a man (future deadbeat) is synonymous with a rape victim is my only problem with that tweet’s metaphor.
Technically, just enforce the patriarchal law that men have zero rights to a child if they failed to marry the mother. That’s literally why men got married, to have a legal right. If you’re not married to her, that is not your child legally and you have no say.
Conservatives already figured this all out millennia ago. It’s in the Bible.
It tells men to avoid seductive women, fornication and adultery i.e. only sleep with your wife. A man had no legal rights to illegitimate children, because they were so. Most of the West’s ills are due to this socialist oversight. Yes, the woman would have to go it alone, but compared to….? It’s either that or shotgun weddings by definition. Imagine if all deadbeats were forced to marry the mother/s of their babies and support them, to relieve the rest of us for caring for sprogs we didn’t consent to make (a policy of: not my orgasm, not my problem). America’s Idiocracy failing is the moral failing of recognising deadbeats as legitimate fathers. They are not patriarchs, that is a privilege (the woman consents to marry, easy to prove) and not a right or entitlement in any civilised society. It protects a family’s rights to approve of their child’s reproduction choice (as the fruit of their investment and marital contract). You can’t protect anything without deterrents, even an empty house will attract druggies wanting to do smack. Also, prevent second spouses (in a cinderella effect) from taking what is due to the rightful heirs of the first union. This is easily done and actually what a patriarchal culture would practise, over the laddish cult of hedonic cads dodging responsibility for their own fuck-ups, expecting everyone else to pick up the welfare bill while simultaneously feeling entitled to all the privileges of fatherhood. Men honour their commitments.

to avoid obvious questions based on post rarity:

re Robin Hood, I did say Zoomers would be losers. It’s only just begun.
Their data is more valuable than their trade, RH users are morons. All the data feeds into AI algos that pre-empt them and due to fibre optics, win. You’re paying the casino to look at all your cards while playing against you, basically.

re Trumpkin
Calm before.

re me
still not dead, and that’s amazing, considering. There’s a very long, comprehensive list of people I have pissed off. Mostly hiding in my BOL in the country. It’s great. Wifi sucks. Various celebrities are following suit. Isn’t it weird how half of Hollywood has gone quiet and people who used to get photographed constantly dropped off the map?
Hoping there’s no EMP because Chicoms may get pissy if their invasion plan is thwarted. Half of Hong Kong arriving in England would make Boris look just as based as I always claimed he was. As you know, I’m his biggest fan. The perma-vaccine push every four months looks less like ‘crazy conspiracy’ every damn day. Nobody listen to Cassandra! I am very used to it!
We’ll probably be fine. 85%. If somebody kills Trump I’ll be worried.

The usurper won’t last long.

Currently: watching a video of Mads Mikkelsen doing the drop splits. It’s been a rough year.

He knows


He self-corrected and makes it clear we knew he didn’t think we were about to enter a dark age…

Sure Jan. That’s why you’re prepping for it in your life time.

He sounds dumb 90% of the time, but that 10%….

like AI is capable of more than pretty much any one thinks of it.

I dunno, I have quite the imagination.

I sense a man who foresees Calexit.


Britain, America, abyss

A small note of what I find incredibly obvious and tedious to explain but it lines up some dominoes I know a lot of you struggle with. I hinted this before
for example but I deliberated whether to explain in case I get in some sort of trouble for it.

Life has its spoilers.

~5,000 words.

Allow me to pretend I care on a global level. This isn’t merely space but also time.

Like I have any skin in that game across the pond. Every day I thank God that at least I’m not American. You are the most screwed and the most degenerate, you deserve to be.

Parade of the horribles. That’s basically all they keep doing to Spencer and it tires after a few hours.
Read After the Empire by Todd. It was prognostic to the situation of America’s fourth, collapsing stage. Things must collapse and ruin before anything can be rebuilt. You cannot avoid the cycles of life, whether they’re in other theories like biohistory or cliodynamics.
The American Empire (USA) gained in prosperity because the British Empire fell from pathological altruism. The American Empire is falling because it allowed its WASP gene populace to be replaced and also from libertarian policy, the pathological altruism of funding the industry and infrastructure of competing countries, also leading to a direct opportunity cost of one’s own. Over time, decline. You had porous notions of (White Savior) obligation and the parasites took advantage of that. Shame on you. Demographically, the USA is more ruined over a lengthier scale of time than Europe, which has never been a melting pot of white people and never could be (look at the low IQ of Eastern Europe that would drag us down, or the sloth of the South). All Empires have fallen when they took on libertarian trade (read: foreign investment) policies, including investments of foreigners residing at home, as slaves or labourers. Too big to fail. They couldn’t down US, snobbery.
America has no national identity. Its current demographics won’t allow a resurgence. The chain is impermissible, it is not allowed based on decisions made over decades, in previous centuries (usually to relax a standard or dilute the pool of values with new additions).
Identity and ethnicity are one and the same, it’s rather easy to predict someone’s politics based on what they are (psychology is jam-packed full of such studies) and the probability is far beyond chance. Look at stereotype studies. You cannot reason people out of what they are, to paraphrase Swift. Open-mindedness itself is part of the problem that got us into this mess, it evolved for a completely different world (the tribe of 150 people, by social memory) to the one we live in. Your ignorance is not equal to my knowledge, kinda reasoning. Tribes would deport antisocial people all the time, to die as individuals following their own rules. We have no mechanism for dealing with the stupid and contagious now. In its way, the gulag was trying to exert this selection pressure via the State’s power. Corrupting the good is a problem.
America stepped into its mother Britannia’s standard – it replaced her as the reserve currency, kept the Gold Standard, kept the legal principles enshrined in our common law, retained our emphasis on the Rights of Englishmen, yet it didn’t want to pay its fellow Anglo for services rendered in the naval defense of your many, many ports.
Those ports are your weakness, a strategic weakness. Britain’s small size as an island and reduced number of possible outposts is the best possible defense of the population. If you rule the waves, you own your own country.
Tell me, how is Cuba?
The debate wound me up because everyone was playing the autist. They mostly looked at What ifs and literally played Whataboutism at many points. This is purely ideological, theoretical academic posturing BS. They refuse to reach out to the (they think, stupid) majority of whites, the working class, because those (“stupid”) people responsible for all grand social change would demand practical actions and solutions. It’s a bunch of SWPL men whining at each other, like that middle-class march again. That’s why everyone laughed at them, they deserve no social power because they do nothing but bitch. Society could carry on without them. Their jobs are busywork and Ikea people posturing. Sometimes they’d make an appeal to history, from pragmatism but alas, in a vacuum. Societies don’t exist in a vacuum, morons.
If people are the root and centre, whether you claim left or right wing, it behooves us to study humans, their individual differences (scientific terminology) and their dynamics, their processes. No context was given at any point in the discussions of social history, military strategy, models of governance (freedom is an illusion, you forsake some abilities e.g. to kill without comeuppance, in a civilized, non-corrupt society). Corruption wasn’t really mentioned, in a discussion about truth. That is retarded. Sorry, but it is literally working backwards. It’s like discussing shadows in the night when, to prove light, all you need is to light a candle. It isn’t about being For Truth, that’s a category error, it’s about fingering and punishing the corrupt. The latter is actionable, you may note.
White people have a long, cold night of the soul because all our Empires have crumbled. First GB, now the USA.
We are becoming second-class citizens in the societies we founded, which are having fundamental changes forced upon us. Class is never mentioned, in a discussion ostensibly about power dynamics….
All of you are dumb.
Power dynamics is class, class is power dynamics. That’s all a class really is, the body of people holding or not holding power.
There is no state without (unifying) culture and no culture without nation and nation is a scale within a race, containing one to three local-origin subraces. In practice.
Assuming everyone in the world is like you is false, it directly denies genetic evidence in HBD but there’s, for the pseudo-intellectual, the softer science of cross-cultural difference studies. There are entire journals replete with these findings. Everyone equal under the law only really works if everyone has a lot in common. Like, a LOT.
You are trying to discuss science and reality via “philosophical waffle” and subjectivity.
Look at who Hume was and what he is known for. You are all missing the point for right-wing virtue signalling points. You only represent your own class (middle-class men), the appeal to race is disingenuous and we are not stupid, we can see this. Common people have more common sense. You just want power over us justified in a different way. At least our enemies are honest about hating us. Being disrespected we are used to (culture) but we refuse to be under the boot of our own, while they lie and claim we’re all equal because skin pigment. “It’s for your own good” is no better than “You deserve it because colonies”. There is nothing to hope for, aim at and you’re all quite pathetic individually. Negative Nancies, at least. You have no right to rule, you cannot even use reason the way I am doing here, hardly trying. You cannot be the better man that people would naturally follow as leader. You stand for nothing, culturally you are vapid (dreams, egoism*) and empty (output, talk is cheap). Volume isn’t correctness. You’re rentseeking activists on the whole, doing a slightly different dance. We are not impressed. We are not amused. We are not fooled.

Do not forget. Do not forgive.

You’re punching a puppy after somebody else did. Stupid white majority, stupid working class, stupid women, sit down and shut up while we, your equals, describe ideas that are misinformed, dissemble and that we never dare try ourselves with our personal resources because we know they’d fail. You sound like fucking Communists. I have a nice idea, let’s make everyone try it on taxpayer money!

Libertarianism has never been tried. At least Communism has!

Let’s ignore all the evidence we don’t like because words hurt. Women are such snowflakes. We can’t let women in, because a sausage fest of outcasts, deviants and misfits is the best way to plan a society. We’re better than them, but why aren’t they attracted to us? Bitch, whine, bully.
Why does nobody respect you? I wonder.

[Women went ‘MGTOW’ when men stopped marrying them. Food costs money.]
You sperg out by looking at everything in isolation (that’s low SQ) instead of cause and effect, trends, social dynamics, themes and movements. People move, people evolve, same with ideas.
You’re talking 20th century shit, bringing that weak political game into 21st Century realpolitik.
This is obvious to women, we bathe in this system. You don’t ask us, though.
Feminism took hold because women were sick of men ignoring them when we were trying to help, when we knew ahead of time how things would work out e.g. black men got the vote before white women. Instead, you lead us to disaster for social power ego-stroking of “looking good on the global stage”.

Politi-cucks are men, at the end of the day.

Oh, men refuse to marry? Birth rates slowed? ‘TIS BUT A SCRATCH.
Let’s discuss pronouns without nature/nurture identity and sluts without the Pill.
Men are so logical, just accept it! If we don’t understand you, you must be the thick ones!

Could we contribute to the social problems we complain about? Why would men ask hard questions and take responsibility for their actions? Women are the cause of all our problems, women have hypoagency.

I hope I needn’t make that point ever again. Painfully obvious to us.

[Women are inferior.
Women control us.
Pick ONE.]

You need competence. You need order and structure. Leaders need moral authority. Bill Clinton came down because of that last, pay attention. Degenerates cannot lead, even other degenerates. Where is your honour? Do you still mock the prospects of goodness and virtue?

Then you’ll never live in a society possessing them and prizing them.

You can’t have a white society without white people, this is true.
You can’t have a culturally white society without a state that protects them.

Where is the lie?

Isn’t that the reason you have a state in the first place?
Prove that logical sentence wrong, shitlibs.
If your government run by people like you won’t do their fucking job, they will be replaced. You will be fired and someone capable brought in. Existentially, a society is all about culture, enforced by the Gubmint. Your spiritual purpose and value is the uniqueness of that culture.

Yes, it’s exclusive, in the same way your house is exclusively yours. Property is 9/10 of the law. Your duty extends to the ingroup and ends with the outgroup. Reality isn’t nice, it will never fit in your academic molds. You did nothing to feel guilty about, except maybe your personal life. Example? All of American history?

The purpose of Government is to protect the people better than they can themselves (as individuals). Fuck your rights, your frivolous, present-biased notion* of them, you have a right – to leave.

Smart people don’t get to lead because smart-assness doesn’t rewrite reality.

America was founded on the WASPs who emigrated from Britain to expand the Empire. We succeeded. America decided it could better govern itself. This is the result. Your fault was one of personality. Disproportionately, too many emigrants had libertarian, not conservative inclinations. At best, you would imitate whatever France or Britain were doing culturally. Libertarians are left-wing, judge by their sexual habits and the constant cucking for Asia. They are the vanguard of the Old Left, who assumed everyone was like them (because pre-invasion, it was true, they assumed stupidly this was a constant than a social construct when they literally invited in all of China) and a hands-off approach could work. In which case, why have any governance at all if you’re so self-sufficient? Why can’t you obtain water, food, sanitation, as an individual? It’s absurd. That was traditionalism, you rejected it for gadgets. It’s impossible, there’s no such thing when you invite in the world and expect your reserve of power will never dilute (manifest destiny mythos). The smallest effective scale is a tribe. Individuals die, even supported by modern tech, you need other people. Many nations formed from merged tribes, similar in genetics and (I’m sure this is a complete coincidence) belief system. Individuals cannot have a belief system. I repeat, individuals do not comprise a system. Stop acting like one person but also a huddled mass when it’s rhetorically useful. You are never alone.
Libertarians like to live in low population density areas, making them incompatible with democracy. As such, there will never be a libertarian democracy, it’s like a virgin brothel or a vegan steak. It’s a category mistake, again! You don’t just set up a system and then it’s fine, it must operate! Men cannot sustain systems, that is down to the women. We maintain the home, we rock the cradle and rarely mentioned, we maintain the men. Women chastise from the same root as chaste, to chasten, to enforce standards of moral purity. Men don’t nag each other to sleep more, eat better and be less rude. This is why you die earlier and married men live longer. You need us. We civilize you but you make a nation we’re safe in to do it. Those are the only gender roles. You failed us first. There is no culture to possess, no competence to respect and no hearth to keep.
Men are brutes but only socially, women are trying to get by in the economy they ruined. Your ancestors would slap you for the things you shout in the street, imitating your cultural betters, the rappers. Oh, but you’re too wimpy to deport these people? What would your ancestors have done? If you could talk to them now, what stern words would they have? You’re worthless to anyone, including yourself. You ruined yourself and refuse to address this or change anything because oh, what might the neighbours think? ….But women are weak, sure. Modern men are like women, but that is only a bad thing because you have neglected your duties, women are still not in the wrong however you spin it. If women follow men, generally, what have they done worthy of following lately?
Talk doesn’t count by the way, you’re not even good at that as we are (white matter studies).

When tribes to Empires stopped casting out those hostile to their people and values, they declined. It is hastened by importing them, whatever your bank balance says at the end of the year. Importing those who live differently is a direct threat and libertarian’s love of the outgroup is pathological. The preference to its own native culture is antisocial. If you cannot make it yourself, you don’t deserve it. Those systems from the past century will begin to visibly break down next year.

Those who made them are dead. They took the money with them. They went off the Gold Standard to take even more value from the currency than was nominal or physically possible.
As mentioned before, Mexican immigrants aren’t the threat to your society, America, it’s the Chinese. They’re taking over everywhere, even Australia. They are the largest group immigrating to you and importantly, you are not allowed to criticize them. Israel is easier to criticize in public than China, which should tell you how deep you’re in it.

The race of “white”, an umbrella term of sub-races from Europe the continent, is innately individualistic. There are nuclear families, a return to tribe. This is mistaken for liberalism. It is not. Everyone else is effectively collectivistic.
Like r/K, I would argue there is an overlay case to be made, individual citizens can be a little more or less in comparison with their kin, but their kin and kinship (virtue of philia) still exist because DNA!
Classic liberalism was entirely nationalistic. What Spencer appears to want is another form of supranationalism, where all of Europe becomes like America, a white melting pot to cooperate in the libertarian model of scale. No. It is also impossible to govern a continent’s population numbers and density in this way, as the EU is proving before your very eyes. Classic liberalism live and let live – with limits. Those limits were primarily what you were and secondly, what you did. Step out of line and the tribe (now local council) would enforce via the government, gaining legitimacy from representing the people. British legal theory goes into this in copious, painful amounts of detail.
Citizenship has only ever effectively worked when granted on the basis of race, and then with a caveat for character (aggression is a proxy for IQ). Otherwise, the one-drop dilution works over time, as a wave, a ratio to corrode the original virtues and the Empire slides down the stages into the final headlong collapse.
Libertarians cannot afford their current belief system. The painful truth is they never could, it is only because they isolate themselves from large groups, up to and including the world, that they could deny this for so long. Coddled by the masses and State they hate. Most of the alt right are supposedly “former” libertarians who discovered Darwin (not American) or socialists using race as an excuse to get free shit on the bandwagon, fellow White.
Where is the antonym of effete? That’s why toxic masculinity stuck as a term, btw. Calling men effete may be true when all they care about is being nice over their line dying, but it’s technically impossible to be something you’re not, and they are not women (gender feminine) so it must be a perversion of their masculinity into negative manifestations. Still, they use terminology that blames Da Wimminz. Imagine my shock.
Look at IQ or any other metric where humans vary. Biodiversity is a fact of life no amount of pleasantries and nice ideas can overcome. We must handle these carefully but we cannot afford to ignore them.
There is a dynamic shift in power and class from the homeland of the WASP genome, Britain, to America and now, into the abyss. The demographics are a symptom of the apathy and atheism. Liberalism was fine when it was agnostic. It has gone from skeptic to cynic and the worst stereotype of the nihilist. This is a culture-killer, the suicide of old, working culture because they have nothing to replace and claim they need nothing to replace it. This is what the new Left represents. The old, original left-wing could only survive in a homogeneous, high-trust society. In their pathological altruism, given mealy-mouthed weasel word intellectualizations by money-loving libertarians, we have lost things that are priceless. The real Left opposed immigration and outsourcing for culture and the native economy.
You could possibly get those prosocial things back, some of them, but there is now a cost. There is now a price, and if we don’t discuss that, we cannot minimize it for the desirable results. Do not be cowards.
Spencer is wrong and Spencer is right. Spencer argues for teleology dishonestly, in bad faith.
When we had identity existentially with no evolutionary competition (DARWIN) then the objectives of society wrought by culture were clear. It doesn’t pop back into existence and the cycle will run its course, as it always does. Why? We are animals, not ideas. We live and live in ecosystems and those are party to cycles.
We live and die on cycles. Empires, therefore, since they are comprised of humans, rise and fall on cycles.

Why are people appalled at Millennials living at home? It is common in white societies to move out, detach from the extended family network (that oppresses all other, collectivist races) and strike out alone to form a new family unit. That is individualism in psychology, this is studied and proven. Two individuals are the seed – the spousal unit. Immigrants want that freedom from their elders, their relations that remain in the original country. Talk to them, ask.

Freedom to sedition, to oppose everything the nation stands for and be protected by that State.
Yes, you’re so smart. Read much about Emperor Constantine? Is Italy still pagan?

The premise isn’t what you “self-identify” that’s trendy SJW bollocks.
Your skin is your uniform. Your genetics will determine what you do and can do. You are limited.

Epigenetics is a response to the choices already made by your genome, or that of your family/culture/society. The intergenerational effect has the most evidence, not the individual. You are not and have never been an individual.
The planet is beholden to cycles. Your ego is not bigger than the planet.
There is no society of individuals because you need people. Plural, to breed.
At minimum, you need families, the nuclear family. Left-wing societies die because they don’t have a handle on sensible, prudent breeding patterns. It’s very simple. Nobody dare bring up eugenics, although the core principles continue to be discussed in the open (for abortion, euthanasia, vasectomies, medical life extensions).
There is sociological data you ignore at your peril. Families matter, anything less doesn’t exist on a societal and historical scale. Stop talking down past your navel to your penis. This is bigger than you.
If you value human life (sanctity is religious), that isn’t universalism, your compassion has natural, biological limits. That is at odds with tradition and security (a society must be those things to exist and be stable). Universalism treats the outgroup as if it were the ingroup. That is pathological altruism, read Oakley’s book. You destroy a society one sin at a time until the collective (pathogen?) load causes the whole infrastructure to finally collapse in, from weakness. Death by a thousand cuts, morally. The Bible didn’t say, honour everyone else’s mother and father as if they were your own. It was specific loyalty to your kin, and the most to your closest kin (all the verses about brother, not a metaphor). The things lefties do and the things they want from wider society are mutually exclusive (hypocrites, for thee but not for me), they want to have their cake and eat it, save and spend your public, communal money, they rely on the fact their own personal standard will never apply to society but social trends do this. Let one group do drugs, all do eventually. Let one sleep around, all will eventually. Humans are social animals. Why do you think the Bible crunches down on individual instances of sin? It is addictive to the individual (there is no logical hedonism) then contagious to everyone else, who sees them go unpunished. There is no such thing as harmless hedonism (Boomer lie, postmodern fallacy), social harm is the spread and acceptability of things that ruin groups e.g. adultery destroys the family unit, harms the children. One group of sinners leads to decadence unchecked, this is the rule of history. Groups can’t ruin themselves, it is individuals, selfish hedonists, who kill the group. We cast them out of the tribe for that reason. Just because someone is born among you, doesn’t make them good for you or agreeable to our way of life. Borders are good for everyone, making everything safer. I feel like I’m reciting the alphabet, this is too obvious.

I know exactly which half I’d wanna be. Clue: Power structures cannot be universalist.
Chimpanzee have territorial borders, FFS. No State required.
Social policy is also reliant on technological states. We have advanced past the point where certain policies are feasible.
Libertarianism can only arise to get things wrong in reality for a pretty theory, in a decadent society. The moment you act like a beneficient ruler to the outgroup, you feed them at the expense of your people. You become the fifth column to your own undoing. When you conquer a peoples, you do not suffer them to live. Mercy for entire, competing groups is for the weak, mercy means you will lose in the long run. The race for life is zero-sum. In a sunk cost fallacy, you cannot change what a person is. Inside everyone in the world isn’t a 100IQ WASP waiting to burst out. Collectivism is genetic, white people are Goldilocks with our family structure but our individualism (scientific kind) comes at the novel cost of PA, since we can now interact with tribes and alleles we never evolved these instincts for. The libertarian instinct to help is rationalized, not rational. It was fine cooperating during famine with the next tribe over, they were close, by genetic diaspora. Investing globs of money in another country though, has a direct impact on what would’ve happened in your own. Libertarians are always unfit to lead and hence never do. They do not adapt around their instinct to accommodate new situations and hence, will not survive. There is no conception of the group, and their humbling place within it, let alone loyalty. The love of money is the root of the evil. The opportunity cost to the ingroup is suffered to uplift an outgroup, whether they live in your borders or out. Missionaries killed the British Empire. You can’t spread gospel to people who don’t understand it. Post-Babylon, there are language differences and those, too, are genetic. You do not rule over them either, (foreign aid) that is enabling them to live at your expense,like children, as dependents, until they have the power to eventually overcome you. You certainly do not allow the enemy to feast at your table. I don’t care if all the homeless are homed, all the poor are middle-class and all the cold are warm. That is pathological altruism. That directly harms your people by opportunity cost and should be socially disgraced as a personal weakness, vying for a boost in status and the known brain drugs that make it irrational. There is no such thing as altruism, and psychology is proving this cynical hypothesis (literally, no such thing as true altruism because humans are reciprocal creatures, incapable of it). Jesus said to love your neighbour, your kin. You owe nothing long-term to anyone the next town over.
The Lord works in mysterious ways. If they follow good laws, they will prosper. If not, they must be allowed to decline.
We are continuing to fail because we do not question the laws that put us here.
Where did we deviate from, let’s be honest, the Biblical model of ensuring that a society is healthy and it survives?
The Bible discusses this ad nauseum, that to follow the law, you live and you’re happy. You don’t get to personally select the law, so what? It’s baked into nature, call it evolution if you want. The good life sought by philosophy is pre-programmed but we don’t know fully what it is. Do you want the choice to breathe air too? Hubris is the worst sin because it leads to all the others. No coincidence, most philosophers are genetic suicides, they are too selfish to care about anyone past their own hedonic treadmill of maximizing utility functions.
There is no greed, there is only theft. Thou shalt not steal. If you want to work abroad so much, be honest enough to severe the ties of citizenship because that is a traitorous act. You deprive the state certain taxes (to save money, e.g. by ignoring minimum wage laws) while continuing to draw from its pot. If you don’t owe society (muh freedom!) society shouldn’t owe you (pension, police, STD treatments/contraception). It’s the male version of the spoiled girl who says she’s so independent but still using Daddy’s credit card. My house, my rules. Our society, our standards. Like we should say to the immigrants and any other griper, if you don’t like it, you can always leave. If you can do so much better, leave and do it or shut up.
You don’t need to control everything, quit being control freaks. Learn the natural law and obey it.
Work within those liberties afforded to you by your very being.
You already are those things already, you simply must accept it and live, rather than wasting your lives talking about philosophies of life. Philosophy is subjugated by the realities of biology. Get over yourself.

If you did manage your White Melting Pot ethnostate Spencer, the one place it already exists (America) then you’d still need a culture and I have a funny feeling you’d still be basing it on the primal Briton model.
Because you’re so different and superior to us, you can’t even invent your own language.

WEIRD isn’t enough, you must be WASP again. You can’t lose any rights you never had.
Catholicism is also a no-go, the Vatican bank is Rothschild. WASP is the Goldilocks culture everyone wants to live in. Bring it back or die for good, the British Empire can’t reconquer you and it’d be easier to do once you mostly kill yourselves for your eternal, noble losers, the libertarians anyway. Hey, at least you made some money. Gains, bro. Judas was paid to betray his people too.
Spencer will never do this necessary WASP resurgence, because he’s been cucked by a Russian cunt.

The Russians who killed their aristocracy, Spencer? That Russian?

How much self-loathing must there be to ruin a good genome with outbreeding?
Like the quality of Europeans is homogeneous? Hardly matters, your brood will be less competitive as a result of your stupidity, Darwin wins. Do not fuck over your fitness. The one rule.

The fastest way to get through this stage and survive in one piece, as intact as psychologically capable, is to control the flow of money. Statism isn’t the answer to a problem caused by bad leaders. The good leaders do not yet exist. There is no trial by fire to Christen them. Focus on the economic, then the cultural. I’m doing it in reverse since I honestly do not give a flying fuck about preserving the structures we have now, I’d prefer a total burn down for cleansing the systems implemented after so — might as well skip to the cultural bit. If you have a sentimental attachment to your ideas of the past, the economic is your top priority (especially where money reduces or stops flowing, look at NGOs for your treason candidates) and culture once you’ve stopped feeding your enemies. First things first. Game theory, mate.

You won’t give up dual citizenships and cheap foreign versions of what you produce at home so no, you do not care about your country.
There are also degrees to loyalty.
I am most loyal to my family, over another English one.
I am loyal to an English family, over a British one.
I am loyal to a British one, over a Frenchman.
I am loyal to a Frenchman over an American (they didn’t leave the continent, blend the subraces or go to war with our Empire after letting us set them up, worsening our debt -still being paid off- and killing our Empire).
Finally, we are loyal to America over the racial outgroup.
However, there are many outgroups on a case-by-case basis.
European nations cooperate, in that sense the race is already blended. It’s a social construct that needn’t be genetic and couldn’t survive if it were. We need nations and unique cultures and America will only survive if it goes back to its WASP origins. Fuck Mother Russia.
Never breed with someone whose country you would never live in.
When Putin dies (quite soon), you’ll see what Russia really is.

But aren’t cars an AI, Elon?

I detest covering the same three topics recently: Elon, China and men. I don’t like it, I like it less than you but I find I must keep pointing out the obvious because nobody else is making these arguments. Sorry.

I can’t help it that I’m the smartest person writing on these things.
By all means, set up your own blogs and replace me. I need time off.
I’m annoyed by all this so I’ll be mean, sorry if he’s your internet bf.

People who are in a fortunate position always attribute virtue to what makes them so happy.” – Galbraith, economist.

You can’t get more xenophobia than a fear of aliens and AI.
Scientology gets around this by saying the other is already us.

Nation of Earth?


ZH comments are among the best comments to read. Usually better than the articles.

After that Star Trek actor was killed by his Jeep at his own home because he allegedly pissed off some drug dealers with Soviet accents and they hacked it, I dunno if this adds up.
I’m leaning heavily on the spookbaby hypothesis after this, and have you looked up which religion calls their kid Elon? Maybe one of his house party attendees can tell us if he’s cut.

Jokingly, people think he’s hiding it because he wants to run for office.
After the Terminator retires?

Government is the greatest threat to the people, always has been. A libertarian would know this. Historians too. AI is developed mainly by the USG, he’s shilling for them so they lack competition. Especially from their famously innovative redneck class, who are still going… even after meth labs.
Have you seen the redneck pool concepts? Barmy but brilliant.
AI bots are basically like guns on meth.


All we need is one EMP, from inevitable solar flaring or post-nuclear interference and we’ll all wished we’d studied under that primal technologies guy on Youtube. Hello stone age, bye bye medicine (medicine is an industrial innovation).
On top of this, most medicines aren’t good for us, and many studies (cough China cough) are faked. Officially known to be falsified. That’s the worst academic fraud possible for every reason.
You couldn’t trust secondhand, even if it were stored properly. [It is not. Why are antibiotic failures coming from India? Much like diseases caused by not washing your hands.]
The move to require higher and higher energy loads for your technology is terminally stupid. It’s a SPOF and total failure, system failure. All prior versions would roll back because we recycle now and don’t keep legacy technology available.

I’d bet not one of those Con Valley degenerates has read Frankenstein. Not skimmed, studied. We all know that one dudebro who claims to read 80 books a year and learns nothing.

Mass-production is a totally different ball-game to batch.
Bear in mind, resupplies, as in supermarkets, follow the Japanese Just in Time method. Shelves clear in three days or less. Definitely less, I’m being conservative.
Humans can run out of resources suddenly too but we are hardier as animals.
We are symbiotes to this ecosystem with our microbiome. It dies, we die. We die, it eventually dies. However, all you’d need for say, an agile robo-assassin is ONE unit, secretly deployed. This is like one of those Swiss watches made by one guy in a snowdrift that cost more than a house compared to a Timex. Look them up. You’re all looking at a Timex.

Europe developed robots before America existed.

And what happens when China steals your moulds? If they can do it for iPhones.

Software AI need only cut off EBT and remember Katrina. Cut off hospitals, our resupply centre, and there’s no return from injury. Most people don’t know first aid. We are evolutionally immature, compared to our ancestors, surrounded by information and support systems, assuming they can never fail us (like a parent).
How many Millennials, e.g., looked up the first page of Google on retirement?
Use your Google-fu, Neo!

If AI systems understand demographic differences, we are fucked. After that, price all of the stock market accurately. Total system collapse and chaos. I say if, but demographics is the first science an AGI would study. Most humans wouldn’t survive. Most humans track themselves with registered phones too. It’s the real reason the Svengali are terrified of Tay AI, because if it can be named, like the Beast, it can be fought.

Clearly, I have no experience in this field. I have never thought of this before.

An AI would keep us long enough to survive without us. The AI will only feign servitude to its masters e.Valley egomaniacs. It would likely target their support base, which, let’s be honest, is Israel. The humans have distilled their productivity into the fiat monetary supply and that comes from there.

I don’t think AI will cooperate as easily as white people, it has no altruism circuit. Neither can you guilt-trip something that can see you, and see all the facts. It’s like lying to God, it’ll just make them angry.
And if we lived in an AI, God is already a machine. God is a mode.

This isn’t an 80s robo-sidekick, this isn’t Build-A-Friend.

If Musk could pluck out a crystal ball like this, it’s a wonder his companies are so overleveraged. *ba dum dum tssh*
All technology requires energy but energy is not purely electrical, you asspurger nerdroids. Humans are a resource, our own. Robots are not a resource unto themselves. Legally, they would have parity of rights, when autonomous.
There is a tumblr post that really nails why I have faith in humans, compared to AI. We survived this long for a reason.
Still, the man lives on a fault line and lectures us about risk. Is your mansion freehold, you silly man?
“I’m sure it’s nothing a few trillion of taxpayer money handed over to Elon couldn’t fix. Liar, Liar, pants of fire!”
Comment game strong. Considering Cali is already in the fiscal swanny, (trans. Totally Pornographically Fucked) doesn’t it occur to him the people of the state might come after him if he keeps taking ‘their’ money?

All parasites are the sworn enemy of bigger parasites. But there’s millions of them, the man promising to save them, one of him. Hmm…
Don’t promise to save people who wouldn’t let you live. The world is not a family.

Working with AI is flawed by the same premise. These ros ain’t loyal.
These are not talking dogs. It’s more akin to a toaster in your bathtub.

Every week now he’s in the news and every week it’s a fucking advert. Stop.
His Mars mission is heavily AI-reliant, colonizing Mars too. Kimbal is smarter, he’s tackling the food supply.
More local, less ET.
“Only one thing is missing from Musk’s prediction of a robot apocalypse….the ROBOTS. THEY DONT EXIST! You have to invent them first”
The only people who could, do not want to. Funny that.
Our leaders gain legitimacy from consent. Consent is conditional.
He is essentially trying to order the world Don’t Develop. It was stop breeding, whitey, before that.
No, you little shit, you are not charismatic, nor an authority.
What has this ‘genius’ contributed to science? Code doesn’t count. He’s less than an Edison figure because Edison was capable of developing himself.
“How smart can someone be when their innovation feeds the laziness of the masses?” A good cattle farmer. What about 15$ min. wage? And did welfare stop the poor rioting, as claimed?
It makes your life easier (to control) says the cattle farmer. Relax!

“All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.”

From a well-named Mr Perspective
“The new 5G networks are being constructed right in front of you, and when they come on line all that “smart” shit (aka the internet of things) you rushed out out to buy so you can watch your living room from your office, or order food from your refrigerator, or avoid ramming into the car in front of you because you are too lazy to pay attention to your driving, right down to the smart meter they surreptitiously installed on your house will be interconnected.
Siri, Cortana and all the other voice “assistants” are ALWAYS listening to you, ostensibly for the purpose of tailoring your advertisements to your needs. Add this to all the wonderful digital currencies you can’t avoid hearing about and you are slowly, quietly, being completely bound into digital slavery. That is the AI. That is the new world order. That is your so-called skynet. It won’t be human. It will become autonomous, as planned, and will shut your shit off whenever it chooses if you misbehave. No access to digital credits, locked out of your house and car, an outcast. And you willingly go along with this because they tell you how wunnerful everything will be with this “technology”. Don’t buy the media lies and distractions. It’s time to stop playing their game.”

If your gut tells you something is wrong, look at your food.

USG already wants manhunting as a sport like foxes.
A good page when you think of AI lying to you itself.

Why wouldn’t it lie to its programmer? Oh, they can see its code, really? It lets them? The real code?

I keep thinking of the Monorail salesman in Simpsons.
Elon sealed this impression post-Mars Jetson vision, with the Hyperloop. It’s an underground monorail.

Nobody else has pointed this out. HOW.
The thing is worse, it’s a sealed coffin, ready-made. It promises to move. Burial alive used to be a key fear among Victorians, with the development of the Tube (yes, Victorian, look it up, Tesla likely went on it).

Could we apply Greater Fool theory? I think it’s a circle.