Born gay is stupid and dangerous, especially if you’re gay

http://aeon.co/magazine/society/why-born-gay-is-a-dangerous-idea/

It’s been obvious to me since the beginning. Never rest your laurels on a single hypothesis – nor legal matters either.
Think of it this way – would you bet all your Finals on your answer to a random, ultra-hard question?

secretly amused laughing lol rdj saints yeah fuck you

For societal deviance and destruction of the Old Order, would you bet your life on a piece of speculation?

joker DC smile smirk evil grin lol haha

Exactly, it’s suicidally stupid.

There is a funny HBD parallel to this in race, their “rationales” oppose one another;

Yet one stark difference between these civil rights movements has escaped notice.

African-American activists aggressively called out {?} arguments about genetic and biological differences as legacies of racist, Nazi science. By contrast, the marriage-equality movement has embraced biological determinism. Gay and lesbian activists have led the way popularising the idea that identity is biologically determined.

Now, if their side is totally and completely wrong about one thing e.g. Gay Germ Theory withstands, what are the odds they’re wrong about their other ‘sciences’? It amuses me, is all.
I mean;

 The battle for gay marriage has been won, and other, even more challenging battles lie before the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) movement. To succeed in them, activists and scholars must abandon the fundamental fiction they have propagated.

Can you blame me?

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

When politics and science mix, it’s hilarious.
They cannot win.
Even if there were biological predispositions, they’d be aborted out of the human genome. Either way – they’re fucked.

Nazi science was committed to uncovering the genetic differences associated with perversion, be that Jewishness, homosexuality, the Romani, people of colour, the mentally ill, or others deemed ‘born that way’.

All science looks to cause. ALL science. Like, that’s why we’re here.
We see a thing and we go – why did that happen? – about a billion times.

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

When we find differences between the forensic races, it’s called scientific racism by idiots. Nah, it’s forensics bruh.
Like, what will it be when we eventually find causative factors for gayness, whatever they may be? Scientific homophobia? That’s it – I’m using that phrase the next time some libtard says Born this Way.
These ridiculous SJW restraints on science won’t allow jack to get done. We’ll sit round twiddling our thumbs because drawing conclusions about people is bigoted stereotypy. Found a cure for cancer? Nah man, we don’t care, that’s albeist!

What is deeply ironic is that nowadays you could get the Jews to walk around with a Star of David on their clothing by choice if you made out it was the fashionable thing to do.

But both share the presupposition of biological determinism: that genetics determine identity; such genes must result in either elimination or embrace. This suggests why the activist alliance with genetic determinism yielded such successful results. [people respect science over rhetoric?]

Sweet while you’re in power (like now and Cathedral support for the useful idiots) or the explanations are nice and fluffy (e.g. pure genetics). What if they’re disgusting (i.e. pathogenic)? What happens when the Opposition take over, eventually? You only need to genocide a tribe ONCE. It’s like terrorism in that regard.

TLDR: LGBT, W/E+?

you're fucked lol tilda constantine gabriel

The Story of Moira Greyland (Guest Post)

askthe"Bigot"

I was born into a family of famous gay pagan authors in the late Sixties. My mother was Marion Zimmer Bradley, and my father was Walter Breen. Between them, they wrote over 100 books: my mother wrote science fiction and fantasy (Mists of Avalon), and my father wrote books on numismatics: he was a coin expert.

What they did to me is a matter of unfortunate public record: suffice to say that both parents wanted me to be gay and were horrifed at my being female. My mother molested me from ages 3-12. The first time I remember my father doing anything especially violent to me I was five. Yes he raped me. I don’t like to think about it. If you want to know about his shenanigans with little girls, and you have a very strong stomach, you can google the Breendoggle, which was the scandal which ALMOST drummed…

View original post 3,064 more words

Link: US Democrats want to strike husband and wife off law books

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/21241-democrats-move-to-strike-husband-and-wife-from-federal-law

We hate to say I told ya so because we wish it hadn’t happened.

staring angry glare really omfg no stop dorian gray

And the Celebrate Pride rainbow profile picture crap was a psychological experiment about friend’s conformity: http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/21233-facebook-celebrate-pride-rainbow-filter-a-psychological-experiment

I say we retake the rainbow symbol. It doesn’t belong to anyone.

Cambridge: Paedophilia is “natural and normal” redux

http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/cambridge-pedophile-is-natural-and-normal-30113/

“Pedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation at a conference held by the University of Cambridge. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

In the wake of gay marriage, critics are claiming that pedophilia will be the next glass ceiling to get broken. A new article by the Telegraph examined the claims from last July…..

Surges of hormones make Hulk angry

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE??!!

…“Pedophiles are told they are the seducers and rapists of children; they know their experiences are often loving and tender ones. They are told that children are pure and innocent, devoid of sexuality; they know both from their own experiences of childhood and from the children they meet that this is not the case.”

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”…

WHAT DID WE SAY.

angry computer rage
WHAT DID WE !£^($!!(“-* SAY.

shooting gun michael fassbender angry patience ran out tired bored no

No amount of chocolate can quell my rage.

Paedophiles now want “equal rights” recognition after “gay marriage”

Sorry I’m late.

http://allenbwest.com/2015/06/that-was-fast-yesterday-it-was-gay-marriage-now-look-who-wants-equal-rights/

Most paedophiles are homosexual, for clarification.

…Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.

In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.”

In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”…

Here in the UK, there have been calls to drop the age of consent via foot in the door. Despite a scandal of paedophile rings by our own Lords and MPs.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/11/18/lowering_the_age_of_consent_u_k_public_health_advocate_john_ashton_wants.html

Naturally, our understanding of the biology and forensics of childhood brought about these changes, back then, children were seen as tiny adults. Now we know about emotional maturity, psychological development and so forth.

What IF being gay is a choice?

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/01/can-you-be-gay-by-choice/

 If a group rests its beliefs (in the case of creationism) or its moral standpoint (in the case of gay rights) on a set of claims which cannot be borne out by the evidence, then it risks losing its beliefs, or sacrificing its moral standpoint, when the facts can no longer be denied.

Literally all the legal framework they’ve built up so far would be torn down. The legal decisions rest on the evidence and arguments presented. When they lose the argument, the decisions are reversed.

That’s why I laughed at the “gay marriage” arguments – they believe it is indelible. Written in stone. Like the Constitution…. it cannot be changed.

Ah. Can you hear Orwell laughing?

If you deny sexual agency, you cannot consent.

Video: Should culture be law?

When it comes to public workers, yes. They are public servants and should treat members of the public equally as a matter of course while in that role, as a qualification. Anywhere else? Hell to the no. Private.

As the Snark Enlightenment said on Twitter on SCOTUS and “gay marriage”;

“if you can’t watch an average gay porn scene without turning away in disgust shouldn’t you take the rainbow off your social media profiles?”

This applies to all of them who aren’t actually that type of gay too, it’s hilarious on another level.
Gay men flinch at lesbians and vice versa. They’re even disgusted amongst themselves. Gay bars often self-segregate for this reason, and further divide by homogamy preference for own race vs no preference.

To put a trivial spin on this, it’s like the Government is dumb enough to think putting all Star Trek fans under one roof will make them argue LESS about Kirk v. Picard.