Yet another Asian targeting whites.
And the homo stereotypes turn out to be true, surprise.
Yes, they want straights.
Yes, they’re befriending you to rape you later, because then nobody will believe you (gay means happy psyops) or they can cry ‘hate crime’. The “homophobia” bullshit is a way of gaslighting male rape victims. It’s like “Nice Guys” befriending women for the same access. Men must be warned as well as women how predators work. Shame the predators, not the victims. Any guy defending the predators (or hybristophiliac woman, at times) must be shamed or considered one of them. Rapists don’t actually have a sexuality, as extreme r, this needs to be more widely known. That’s why they flip flop from raping women or girls as easier physical targets until they rape thinner or drugged men in prison, or randomly attack animals (yes, like a serial killer but also no, worse).
They should separate prisoners by crime, all the rapists in one building. It’s only fair.
My heart goes out to those poor men and this subhuman should be put against a wall and shot for crimes against humanity. Rapists aren’t actually human. They’re sexual sadists, that is untermensch. Whether they target adults or kids doesn’t matter, that’s actually a matter of availability, they’re missing the human bit of their brain, it’s more than empathy, it’s an impulse of a predator to destroy humans in the most personal way. We put a dog down for biting a human ONCE, what of intimate crimes?
The more you let sluts brag about their ‘conquests’, the more this will happen, since it gives rapists (always narcissistic) a socially desirable license to brag, like a serial killer revisits their crime, serial rapists are proud to gloat about their ‘seductive’ prowess. [Look up the definition of seduction, things the person doesn’t actually want to do, where they don’t actually consent but Hollywood has conditioned us into thinking that’s fine. It isn’t. ]
Keeping sex taboo for polite society (hell, to anyone but your spouse and doctor) actually reduced the amount of rape by removing a key incentive for that attacker, street cred. Why don’t they teach this in Sex Ed? So they can back up the rapists culturally (all hybristophiliac SJWs do) and claim all ‘sex’ is consensual. This is insane.
Sodomy used to be a crime for this reason, do you think most sodomites actually consented to that? Their pozz parties are famous for drugging under-age twinks or holding men down. That’s why they wear all the fetish shit to parades, it’s what they are, they’re proud of it. This’ll get memory-holed. If over a hundred women had been anally raped (a reason they normalised it) then the SJWs wouldn’t shut up, rightfully so for once. I doubt the MRAs are going to support these men to one tenth of that, because they don’t actually care about the men, it’s all about hating exclusively white women (how original, they sound like the Guardian) under the banner of multicultural ‘brotherhood’, a globalist replacement for nationalism to prevent real change and red-pilling. Clearly, events like this show it can’t work out. As I predicted, if all these ‘bro’ types moved to an island and no evil ‘white’ women were allowed, the rapists would just prey on them, as they do in prison, the military or during SHTF civil war events. Men need support but it must be national, grassroots and nothing bitter about the opposite sex, because it’s nothing to do with that. Most attacks on men are also done by men, it’s a sad fact. [Yes pedo teachers should be hanged too, duh.]
What the MeToo detractors totally missed is that plenty of men are victims of these men as well.
Rapists get off on the attack itself, a lot of them don’t care what sex you are but since men aren’t warned about rapists like a viable threat, they’re usually more vulnerable with “binge drinking lad culture”. It’s absurd as saying thieves won’t attack the poor. You might not be their preferential target due to body strength but if pickings are slim they will, so we must be taught about rapists in Sex Ed. Hook-up “culture” also gives them the ‘consensual’ excuse, even when the target is religious or a different sexuality. We’re all presumed to be degenerates in court, this is wrong. Enough of this, the Victorians didn’t put up with this. We’re the only time the First World is actually pro-criminal in practice and trying to ask the victims to do the impossible, prove a negative. You can’t prove something WASN’T consensual (that’s why modern rapists use the line) so to use that as a defense should be invalid (unless they have positive proof). That’s how logic works. Now the legal system is gaslighting men on the subject of consent, maybe this’ll get the review it needs, like calling the rape slavery victims a “lifestyle choice”.
Most offences of rape, as here, are done by the same small pool of rapists. Like most murder is committed by serial killers but written up by instance, if we simply brought back hanging for this very select, small group, those crimes would be pretty much eradicated overnight. We can’t say that about anything else.