Global Trends, Europe

2018:

Promising other people’s money is slavery.

Fuck you, champagne socialists.

The Guardian academia protests about ‘muh pensions’ won’t be the half of it. You didn’t earn a pension, Rome fell by making them non-military too. Public pensions are a myth to compel obedience from these useful idiots.

Being sustainable actually = national sustainability and avoiding over-breeding beyond food security and other needs. K-selection, not the promising of fiat gibs.

Caps from:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/771309/Global_Strategic_Trends_-_The_Future_Starts_Today.pdf

search food, meat, protein, China

just have fun

“Immigration could offset population declines in Europe”

and they show a photo of Muslims.

EU growth since 2000: 17% against the world average of 47%

Yes, let’s leave the Marxists in charge of everything.

They actually think the GDP will be the same with more Muslims and declining native population, with it declining national IQ.

Because we’re all interchangeable cogs, right?

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is death.

You cannot make accurate predictions with this. GDP is best predicted by national IQ,

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/the-smart-fraction-theory-of-iq-and-the-wealth-of-nations/

“the value 0.73 actually underestimates the strength of the relationship”

so the racial genocide replacement politely called ‘demographic change’ will cause national IQ to decline and with it, GDP. Even less revenue than now, idiots.

Run the bloody numbers.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

Not that we’re avoiding ((debt)) even now.

They actually think GDP is a constant though, like the Sun rising in the East, it just happens.

Nobody takes extra hours because the tax system is fairer or wants to work hard as a virtue, no. No effort, just rely on it.

They actually think this. R-types do not understand resource scarcity or how hard it is to build up resources. They are infinite, in their minds.

They want to replace you. Remember this when they’re begging to be saved by random white people.

No appeal to white guilt, thank you. #Notyourwhitesavior 

The EU needs us, our military, as previously covered.

They can’t get a federal Europe until we feel threatened enough to sign up.

They also screech about fascism without using the word.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/04/30/fascism-historically/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/17/told-ya-so-eu-army-forced/

All you need is one damn book to understand this better than the MOD:

The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics

Who would win?

 

MOD budget versus $6.99.

From the smart fraction post:

Thus, for a technologically sophisticated society, SFT asserts that a nation’s per capita GDP is determined by the population fraction with IQ greater than or equal to some threshold IQ. Consistent with the data of Lynn and Vanhanen, that threshold IQ is 108, a bit less than the minimum required for what used to be a bachelor’s degree. Figure 3 illustrates the fit of (3) to the data of Lynn and Vanhanen.

Dysgenics kills GDP.

Your immigration policy will starve you, State, for importing voter leeches.

They find about 70% of the variance in IQ is associated with genetic variation. Bouchard et al, Science, Oct 12, 1990, present an excellent review of these studies.”

Know thy HBD or die.

Controlling thus for environmental factors, Murray found earnings stratified conspicuously by IQ.

There is much more, Estraneo, but two nails are sufficient to fix the direction of a one-way sign. The arrow of cause points mostly from IQ to income, and not the other way round.”

Food security lecture

Useful format.

also

2 minutes of hilarious ass-covering.

Entrepreneurs can’t invest in a socialist system?

Pensions are killing companies?

Banks hate savers?

Human investment is low because of globalisation?

No. Shit.

Nothing to do with national IQ, huh? No link researched ever, eh?

Benefits cliff? Importing old NHS drains? No?

The last one is some fun to round out a depressing watch.

The smarter atheist myth

No! People on reddit lie!?

The myth of the smarter Atheist

What we see is a fairly weak relationship between national religiosity and average national IQ. Once we get up to about 20% of the population being Atheist, the IQ of the population flatlines at around 100 from then on. Even worse, in the ~0% Atheist range, there’s a wide range of national IQs from 64 to 100+ — with a cluster of low-IQ nations that appear to be driving the “trend.”

Indeed, if we look at income per capita instead of religiosity, we already see a much better correlation with average IQ. The correlation between religiosity and IQ is too weak to suggest that religiosity predicts intelligence on the national level. Anyone who claims otherwise is grasping at straws.

You could study it..

Religions and IQs driving that aren’t all the same uniformly across the planet.

Just look at the West? No?

 I created a less misleading version of Kanazawa’s plot below; judge the data for yourself.

Religious people are less likely to attend college, where tests are taken…

The most religious adults had an average IQ of 97.14, whereas the atheist adults had an average IQ of 103.09. That may seem like a wide gap — 6 whole IQ points — until we remember that anyone in the IQ range of 90-109 is classified as having “average intelligence.”

Yeah, it’s a bigger gap than same-race gender, at least?

Under two points, you must be so proud. What measurement error?

So really, all Kanazawa showed is that the average person has average intelligence regardless of how religious they are.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/twin-research-and-human-genetics/article/how-cognitive-genetic-factors-influence-fertility-outcomes-a-mediational-sem-analysis/8357A0764069B330F443B88ED24FE486/core-reader

How Cognitive Genetic Factors Influence Fertility Outcomes: A Mediational SEM Analysis

Utilizing a newly released cognitive Polygenic Score (PGS) from Wave IV of Add Health (n = 1,886), structural equation models (SEMs) examining the relationship between PGS and fertility (which is approximately 50% complete in the present sample), employing measures of verbal IQ and educational attainment as potential mediators, were estimated. The results of indirect pathway models revealed that verbal IQ mediates the positive relationship between PGS and educational attainment, and educational attainment in turn mediates the negative relationship between verbal IQ and a latent fertility measure. The direct path from PGS to fertility was non-significant. The model was robust to controlling for age, sex, and race; furthermore, the results of a multigroup SEM revealed no significant differences in the estimated path coeficients across sex. These results indicate that those predisposed towards higher verbal IQ by virtue of higher PGS values are also predisposed towards trading fertility against time spent in education, which contributes to those with higher PGS values producing fewer offspring at this stage in their life course.

Jews score higher on verbal IQ….

Cultural individualism and businesses

https://www.ecfed2018.unican.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Empreendedorismo-20180530-Daisy.pdf
Individualism, Culture and Entrepreneurial Opportunities*

brb altering history

The present paper evaluates the effect of living in an individualistic society on
entrepreneurial opportunities, using cross-country data from the GEDI. Individualism
is one of the five cultural dimensions proposed by Hofstede (2001) and it is considered
by intercultural psychologists the main dimension of cultural variation. For individualism is a cultural trait that emphasizes freedom and rewards one’s own personal
achievements, it increases the propensity to open new businesses and realize own ideas,
despite the possibility of failure. So as to prevent reverse causality between individualism and entrepreneurial activity, we use the frequency of blood types and other
genetic data as instruments. The data show a positive and highly significant effect
of individualism on entrepreneurship, even after controlling for education, religion,
fertility, unemployment, the ease of doing business, networking, among others.

Economists try to pretend the race-culture connection isn’t important but….

I screencapped.

Look at ‘lil Venezuela down there, I wonder what will happen to them?

This is why Trump doing the trade war is a genius move. THIS.

In countries with more individualistic cultural characteristics, they have a predominance of individuals seeking potentially better opportunities to conduct an initial business, as well as characteristics with a greater perception of entrepreneurial opportunity. Similarly, Figure 5 suggests that countries with
more individualistic cultures often have greater opportunities to start a business. As for example, Canada, United States, Great Britain and Australia. The ten countries with the highest GEI index in 2017 were: the USA, Switzerland, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands.

I wonder what THEY have in common.

1950s GDP: not race (only) but cultural individualism.

Therefore, it measures the quality of entrepreneurship, as we are concerned with the quality of entrepreneurship: the entrepreneur driven by opportunities that generate commercial success. The definition of entrepreneurship that we will adopt is related to job creation and growth through innovation.

aka GDP, real ingroup gains

No, Asians can’t take over capitalism. That can literally never happen.

They’re collectivists, they get crony capitalism, they’ll fuck it up.

We just have to survive that.

I wonder what this figure indicates…

Yes.

You’ve got me.

Yes, this is definitely my opinion.

My educated opinion.

As you can see, I am very jelly.

Thus, the most appropriate model for the analysis of the effect of entrepreneurial activity on individualism is that of column (5).

Considering the above-identified situation of a possible endogeneity between the variables, instrumental fractional variables were included for the econometric analysis. This process requires variables that are related to individualism, but not to entrepreneurial activity.
This hypothesis is sufficient so that the causal relation can be established in the proper direction. Thus, for individualism we use the blood distance of Mahalanobis and the pathogenic genes according to Gorodnichenko and Roland (2017). In table 2, the individualism and each possibility of instrument: distM-UK and mean of pathogens, which are, respectively, Mahalanobis blood distance between the country in England and the mean of the presence of the nine genes pathogens considered relevant to Murray’s individualist collectivist analysis: leishmaniasis, trypanosomes, malaria, schistosomiasis, filaria, leprosy,dengue, typhus and tuberculosis.

My opinion, clearly.

I magically altered their blood, to lie.

I can do that.

The relationship is negative, because it suggests that the closer to the entrepreneurial country, the more individualistic the culture will be.

Table 3 includes some more control variables, particularly related to institutions and their long-run effect on development. Precisely due to their persistence, it is important to separate the effect of culture from institutions as good as possible, although this it is a difficult matter and still an ample field of research (Gorodnichenko and Roland 2017; Spolaore and Wacziarg 2013)

Muh opinion, clearly.

I’m just jealous of cultures that enslave their children to make my phone.

Table 4 repeats our preferred estimation, the fractional probit instrumental variable model,
for a number of subsamples. On the one hand, the sample is divided into countries that
experienced European colonization and those that did not. The former may have suffered
a mixture of cultures that is not captured by the genetic data. Therefore, if any, we expect
the effect of individualism to be stronger and more precise in the latter subsample.

To sum up, we find remarkably few differences in the magnitude of the individualism index
across the estimations in tables 3 and 4. In fact, the point estimate is not statistically
different from the baseline regressions in table 2 and in all of the seven estimation do
we obtain a positive and significant effect of individualism on the opportunity to start a
business.

The argument for muh civic nationalism, muh brain drain immigration is a pack of lies.

They are not the same as us.

The present paper evaluated the hypothesis that individualism can influence the entrepreneurial activity, accounting for cross-country differences in education, religion, fertility, unemployment, ease of opening a company and networking. The data shows a strong and remarkably robust relationship between living in an individualistic culture and entrepreneurship.

Things libertarians pretend to give a shit about.

The West is WEIRD – nobody else.

Although one should be careful in interpreting our results as causal, our estimates of fractional probit instrumental variable approach suggests a plausible interpretation of this relationship. We explored other potentially important channels in determining entrepreneurial activity.
The effect may potentially be confounded by geography, climate conditions, or through European colonization, as well as through persistent institutions, such as the risk of expropriation. In addition, the influence of the culture dimension of individualism was tested separately for each group of countries belonging to the OECD or not. It was concluded that the effects remained positive and significant, confirming the validity of the results and of the instruments.
Finally, the perceptions of the opportunity to start a business are different from society
to society, so the origin of these differences and their influences is important. Thus, this
article thus complements the studies on entrepreneurship (Pinillos and Reyes (2011), Liñán
and Fernandez-Serrano (2014), Dheer (2017), Doepke and Zilibotti (2014), Laskovaia et al.
(2017) and Nikolaev et al. (2018).

Ya snooze, ya lose.

UK K-shift

I’ve never posted exact numbers, have I?

Let me show you your debt slavery.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/breakdown

70% extra taxes – the going rate for dysgenics. Oh, you’re paying for it.

45% top tax rate not including other stuff.

I include the calculations for the morons who’ll dispute maths.

70*0.45 = 31.5%

over a third of your time working is slaving away for people who don’t want to.

Like we do?

Sorry Susan, we’re not supporting your ability to watch Loose Women and bitch about your grandkids. Tough titties that you paid for wine and cruises over retirement savings. Guess you should’ve thought about that when you voted for Labour without waver the past half a century.

But wait, there’s more!

There’s a reason I’m so optimistic this country will literally run out of shekels before we can be replaced fully.

Millennial exhaustion!

Plan on a 50 year ‘career’?

50*.315

15.75 years working like a slave because Barry the Boomer won’t get off his arse.

That’s right.

I am this way because of statistics and facts.

I crunched the numbers one day and the results were in, literally Hitler.

Can you use a calculator? When did you decide to become a shitlord?

Go Galt and grow your own food, you won’t eat litres of pesticide per year and you’ll have saved more money than if you ‘worked’ and got taxed to pay for food that will also be taxed. While supporting the EU. Where the companies are taxed. However, if you can get the fruit of their labour on steep sale, dehydrators are worth the money plus free seeds.

https://tomclothier.hort.net/page05.html

Also great for making bar fruit.

Better food, less money, more free time. Problem?

Look at every expense necessary for life like this. Through the filters of time and tax.

Do not fund your own replacement.

Now you catch my drift, back to UK official stats.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2010_4UKb_00t
Yes, this is sustainable waste.
https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/year_spending_2020UKbt_17bc1n_001040#ukgs302

Don’t look at the statistics.

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_debt_analysis
It’s immigrants, but blame the economy. For the economy.

“In 2005 the UK National Debt was less that £0.5 trillion.

But then came the worldwide financial crisis of 2008 and subsequent recession.

The National Debt increased rapidly and went over £1 trillion in 2011 and over £1.5 trillion in 2016. At the end of March 2019 the National Debt was £1.80 trillion.

Obviously, they can’t do that again.

+50% in five years? Under the Tories? Fucking really?

11 years of total immigration flood, tripled national debt. Complete coincidence.

(Net immigration means nothing).

Odious debt must be repudiated. Exit tax the immvaders. Good enough for CA.

In terms of Gross Domestic Product the UK National Debt in 2005 was about 38 percent of GDP.

But in the last ten years, in the wake of the Crash of 2008 and subsequent recession, the National has doubled to over 80 percent GDP, but is leveling out as a percent of GDP. At the end of March 2019 the National Debt was 84.6 percent of GDP.”

Thanks, Labour! Commies ruin economies.

And this is what they claim as debt, not the full sum.

As previously stated, we’re screwed.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

Plus, at around 90% GDP drops anyway (known economic effect) because the populace strangely isn’t as productive…….

Huh.

Turns out THIS is our socialist utopia.

War-time debt/GDP, what kinda war do you call this?

https://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/rev/google_vis.php?title=Total%20Debt%20As%20Percent%20GDP&year=2006_2019&sname=&units=p&bar=1&stack=1&size=800_600&spending0=36.67_37.25_38.86_49.14_65.47_72.01_75.90_79.75_82.17_83.69_83.73_86.72_86.17_84.60&legend=Public%20Net%20Debt-total&source=a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a


Austerity is a hilarious myth.

It’s right fucking there.

And note: 2009 debt/GDP is still under 50%, don’t blame Muh Recession.

Pensions are welfare, at least a UBI wouldn’t be ageist. It isn’t a military pension, you don’t earn national funds by existing. Breathing for 60 solar rotations isn’t a qualification.

Young people can’t marry, move out, have kids, because lazy bastards didn’t want to work for the last 40 years of their life, preferring to abort their kids or make immigrants pay for them. We all literally know people who’ve been retired longer than they worked, fiscally impossible to justify.

One lazy generation who didn’t even fight a war for us is disabling the future existence of our people and culture.

When the Boomers pass, this shitshow will really get on the road.

Link: Why we need eugenics

The founding stated purpose of the NHS was eugenic.
It isn’t what your history teacher brainwashed you.
Every celebrity sticking up for “healthcare” is into eugenics.
As long as the NHS pays for abortions and contraception.

Repeat abortions nursing article:

“there is a significant risk that the child would suffer physical or mental abnormalities leading to serious handicap”

Various conditions will disappear.

http://atavisionary.com/why-we-need-eugenics/

Important practical note:

Logically, you’d need proportionate eugenic policies to simply counterbalance the dysgenic ones, purely to even it out and start from neither. neutral position. Eugenic in this case is basically any policy that encourages healthy taxpayers to have more kids and raise them properly (that will also have better life outcomes and so on into prosperity via pursuit of individual happiness helped by the nation state they own, how terrible, right?). Dysgenic is whatever prevents this sustainable circle of life (holds aloft a lion cub) or more directly harmful, promotes ill-health and sterility in a population swayed by antisocial (punitive) policy changes. It’s technically dysgenic to promote the continuation of the “loser” lines of the outgroup too (keeping prisoners and slaves instead of killing them in war means eventually your kids will breed with them) but that’s also pathological altruism (classic empire suicide) and only formerly happened when a major war was lost and most of the healthy men were dead (conquest). Migration patterns is a PC way to say “conqueror boundaries”.

To promote continuation of another genetic line over one’s own isn’t merely genetic suicide and likely a form of madness (nothing in evolution accounts for this and it’s direct ingroup harm), it’s literally a spin on treason.

If the outgroup is so great, go live among them before “helping”.

Demographics matter. Biology matters. People’s personalities, including non-cognitive traits that affect life outcomes, are highly heritable. Specific pro-social temperaments conducive to civilization have been demonstrated to be genetically determined in animal studies with foxesand mice. In addition, all relevant identical twin studies have found that genetics accounts for at minimum 45% of the total variation in intelligence within populations. A significant portion of studies, notably including the most comprehensive ones, have estimated the genetic contribution to be between 70 and 80%. The heritability of intelligence has also been demonstrated in non-human primates.

IQ as a measure of intelligence and a predictor of positive outcomes has been demonstratedbeyond any shadow of doubt. Not only are those with high IQ more likely to have positive life outcomes on a personal level, but their efforts as a class contribute significantly more to the economic health and technological progress of civilization than the average or low IQ classes.

You want equal outcomes?
Start with equal contributions!

“They can’t”? Yeah, we know!

That is literally our point.

So who owes whom, considering the people who take more than they produce have the privilege of living off those other people already, purely for a coincidence of geography?
National socialism, right there. Producers enslaved to consumers, seems temporary.

They complain about The Rich but never want to kick the Russians out of London, do they?
Then it’s lachrymose Guardian pieces blithely bemoaning why property is so expensive.
Putin kicked those corrupt Russians out and you wanna keep them? WHY?

The only Russian collusion is with real estate agents.

IQ is so important to civilization, in fact, that the relative wealth of a country can be accurately predicted from average IQ*. Intriguingly gains that result from increasing intelligence do not suffer from the law of diminishing returns. Therefore, the relative fertility of high intelligence vs. low intelligence people has significant implications for the evolution of civilization and humanity…..

Evolution is ongoing remember.

Incentives make societies based on their priorities and values, punitive sanctions on health and markers of prosociality e.g. income tax paid, decay the society of envy.

The politics of envy end in death. I guess it’s the sociopath’s way to prevent ‘suffering’.

I feel like the only person to notice how America’s hand-wringing guilt over its “evil” supposedly ‘eugenic‘ sterilizations of the grossly dependent went without mention during the unusual boom times a generation plus afterward. The same prosperity occurs after the natural culling effect of major disease outbreaks. This happens everywhere.

Black Death > Boom, Renaissance

Everywhere.

We are totally fucked.

http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/interest_rates_and_national_debt_press_release

A new paper by the TaxPayers’ Alliance sets out the economic landscape in which the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will make its latest interest rate decision, and makes the case for not raising borrowing or spending despite superficially alluring low interest rates.
  • EVEN if interest rates remain at their historically low level of 0.25 per cent, then the national debt is projected to reach 234 per cent of GDP in 2066-67.
  • However, it is very likely that rates will go up soon, and when they do, the national debt as a percentage of GDP is also projected to rise.
  • By 2066-67, any increase in interest rates will mean a significant increase in the national debt as a percentage of GDP.

Their bold.

That’s going by official numbers, which are …wrong.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/04/13/real-uk-debt-at-least-8-6-trillion/

Who do we owe this fucking money?

Can’t we just break their kneecaps with a naval fleet?

Those were the days.

debt gdp uk forecast

They’re being Pollyanna, guys.

The UK’s fiscal situation is still very fragile :
  • The UK’s national debt currently stands at £1.7 trillion.
  • This is equivalent to 89.3 per cent of GDP.
  • When compared internationally, the UK has the eighth highest national debt in the EU and the fifth highest in the OECD.
  • In the financial year ending March 2017, the UK’s national debt increased by £68.1 billion.
  • This is the equivalent of £5.7 billion a month and £186 million a day.
  • The UK government spends £48.4 billion each year on debt interest payments, more than it spends on the police transport combined.

Someone’s gonna have to work that off.

Can you guess who?

The cocky liberal arts champagne socialists who think they’re too good to work a real job. That’s who.

It’s going to be precious once they figure this out.

Don’t interrupt them as New New Left eats New Left. Just let them slowly clock what’s actually been going on this entire time. When the police lose their pensions will be interesting. Teachers?

The Neo-Nazis will also fail, the solution to socialism’s collapse is not more sodding socialism.

Santa didn’t bring them toys, they gotta make toys too.
Socialists are confidence tricksters on a national scale.

Negative effects to UK economy

In addition to higher debt interest payments and a bigger national debt, there are other serious negative effects of increased borrowing that are not currently part of the debate:

(i) The UK has a floating exchange rate and so has a small fiscal multiplier. So if capital does not come from other parts of the UK capital market, it must come from other economies. This results in the real exchange rate rising. This has a negative impact on the competitiveness of UK exports.

(ii) Index-linked gilts form approximately 25 per cent of the UK’s gilt portfolio, a high percentage compared to other highly developed economies. As a result of the relatively high proportion of index-linked gilts, the UK’s level of debt is particularly susceptible to increases in inflation. Therefore, the MPC has a further incentive to consider a moderate increase in interest rates in order to curb inflation.

try capitalism

(iii) The UK pays interest on the bonds which it issues in the form of yields. If the national debt increases then these yields will have to increase in order to attract investors

Fuck investors.

(iv). Very high national debt can have a negative impact on economic growth. For example, borrowing can crowd out other investment as investors loan money to the government, rather than to the private sector. Nations typically see growth slow when their debt levels reach 90 percent of GDP, with the median growth rate falling by 1 percent and average growth falling by even more.

Good news – we can’t take more immigrants.

Bad news – we can’t take the current population.