Geeks and Jocks, same coin

They always have been, where have you been?
It isn’t a gender-exclusive thing. It’s status signalling.

One of the biggest myths is that geeks are always harmless and never aggressive, but passive aggression is more insidious. The delta and gamma are the type of person who’ll get angry when you reject them, feel as if you owe them and do most of the serial killer stuff. The jocks will probably just shout and punch you in the face, then leave you alone. Geeks (and nerds) are not superior but they believe they are since they over-value intellect and pointless hobbies. Obsession is NOT a healthy thing. It isn’t the same as passion.

Just look at NRx modern aristocrat stuff.
They wear suits instead of sportswear. Same thing. All about peacock attraction because they’re the sex with less sexual options but more sexual desire.

Anyone who thinks they’re superior to you won’t make a good partner in anything, let alone life. And when they fail, they project, a lot. It’s never Mister Superior Intellect. There are plenty of jokes about Mrs Always Right but the male version is worse. All the bitchy, not even a woman.

It’s a way to compete dishonestly, covertly. As fake as those bulked up whey protein muscles, except they brag about all the books they read (and none of them surprising). As much signalling as the girls who brag about the popular title games they played.

The pretentious intellectual is worse than the gym bro, because at least the gym bro has external accomplishments and something to brag about. The pretentious intellectual reads the same books as everyone else and thinks they’re special for reading Dawkins, Greene and ‘old books’. Because who’d read that stuff if they couldn’t talk about it after? The pretentious people are hollow and have nothing original to offer, that is why they face constant rejection. They’re trying to imitate originality and getting angry when everyone is smarter than them.

They confuse shade with wit. Engage bitchiness, become respected Dr House.

Like, sure, they judge a woman as ‘worthy’ of his company and praise – if she completely agrees with him. Kant would be proud.

Irish comic character cast as mixed mystery meat

https://mic.com/articles/152038/zendaya-is-mary-jane-in-spider-man-homecoming-so-of-course-there-s-racist-backlash

Parents

Mixing nixes the white recessive genes. This isn’t political, it’s Mendel.
If you do not agree, you literally need to pick up a school book because you are inferior in intellect to a child.

Detour for butthurt:

aintevenmad

Behold, an Egyptian! And he’s one of the swarthier looking ones!

At best, they’re tan. And the ancient ones were paler because the Muslims hadn’t invaded yet and raped the women as slaves. #history #educateyourself

Fuck Afrocentrists claiming the white people stole from them for once! [FBI data, suck it]
We have genetic proof from mummies, documentation from the time and other cultures and artwork showing the elite (at least) were, in fact, pale. As in, white. This is conclusive, definitive and anyone arguing differently is a rent-seeker on white achievement. Cleopatra was Ptolemaic dynasty, a Greek-racial line (fun facts: the Greeks used to be blond closer to the founding of their Empire, Helen of Troy was blonde, but as they mixed and became swarthier, the Empire fell; I’m sure that’s a coincidence and nothing to do with Calhoun). She insisted on using Greek in documents in tandem and preferentially. The Rosetta Stone is no coincidence, and they used many languages because the equivalent of newspapers were leaving out stone tablets with the official record on them.

blog.oup.com/2010/12/cleopatra-2/

Apparently speaking Afrikaans would make me suddenly Black? Does that mean white African settlers aren’t colonialist oppressors now? #unintendedconsequences

To sum up: it is quite possible that Cleopatra was pure Macedonian Greek. But it is probable that she had some Egyptian blood, although the amount is uncertain. Certainly it was no more than half, and probably less. The best evidence is that she was three-quarters Macedonian Greek and one-quarter Egyptian. There is no room for anything else, certainly not for any black African blood. 

But sure, these people are the ones telling us race doesn’t matter. Of course, all their actions show this.

cute wink

Back to the SJW corporate entryism problem murdering anything cool by making the bandwagon a campaign slogan when the entire purpose of comic book films is ESCAPISM from that EXACT bullshit…

(these people are Grundies, they are the anti-matter of cool)
(as in, all this casting tumblrism nonsense may be making comic films unbearable for regular people)

I love the logic of these people, the way they claim if this one actor doesn’t get this one role in this one appearance-based industry they chose to work in, then every example of that race is doomed to failure like the Borg, but with black people. Is that not racist to assume, that they need Blackwashing Welfare? Why can’t black people write more books and make those books into films? Would they not be as good/popular? Why play the Cup and Ball game with actors? (Although seeing the signalling SWPL out of their multi-million dollar jobs is a 24K gold lining to this, finally they see consequences, hence intersectionality, really Black Power Feminism, oddly hasn’t caught on).

We all know the Spiderman reboot has been a shit-show but to fuck up the romantic lead as well? The character is bland, she does nothing but look ginger. That is her purpose, look reddish and pout. They know the performance but assume this franchise is a shoo-in for purchasing toys. Seriously, check the BO figures and compare to the Irish-complexioned counterpart once these become available.

This girl isn’t even black, the worst part is they keep calling her black when she clearly isn’t. She’s mixed, an entire other group, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills the way they abuse the One-Drop Rule when it suits them, labelling anyone slightly black as Black (Obama, basically all the part-black scientists by descent), but using it yourself for scientific purposes (e.g. heart medicine, not poisoning them) is supposedly bad?

Heads will roll...

Yes, these two could be twins…

See, first they replace the white people in Hollywood because the propaganda didn’t go far enough in the past 50 years (dating site data), then when white people see their immigrant replacements in the street (and outnumbering them, plus super-fertility) their brains don’t flag it up, accepting it as normal. That’s the plan. They did the same with the false Fun Gay stereotype, but ignore the facts on suicide, drug use and domestic abuse, they cracked a joke in this show. Humour creates sympathy without actually doing anything, and oh look, the Funny Black Sidekick stereotype appears! Wow, such coincidences.

Political correctness lies to create change, thusly Progressivism is brittle and already crumbling, with nothing Patriarchal left to burn as a distraction. Regular people are noticing now and disoriented.

There’s nothing racist about noticing that there’s no such thing as a black girl without black hair, they are literally defined by their hair colour more than their skin, the defining character trait is red. This is like when they hired the talentless hack black girl to play Lady Guinevere, whose entire thing was being white in the legends of a white country that had a real Saxon king called Arthur in a white continent and then claimed it was cos she was ‘best for the part’ (then again with ANOTHER black/mix playing literally The White Queen) and everything was ‘mythical/fictional’ (so why not ‘hire’ a sock on a stick? logic) bull-SHIT.

Let us not forget the worst example in recent history.

The sequel is not canon, QED.

If they can get you to say up is down once, their politics of delusion have got you for life. We are not blind and people are not putting up with this pretension, that’s what it is, a pretense. If you enter a looks-based industry, you choose to be judged on your looks. If race doesn’t matter, this shouldn’t happen. Yet we even see it with models despite their casting also being chosen based on clothes revenue (because that’s their job, not to stand there, but sell) as an actress’ job is to sell the character they are based on.

Social justice gives people a chance who don’t deserve a chance, on the grounds that other people get chances. It’s cultural welfarism and the groups involved should reject it on principle. If they believed they had merit to compete fairly. You have a toy, they must get a toy. You get to play Princesses (European royalty), they must get a Black Princess because fuck logic even when it’s set in a non-monarchical society. Selling toys is one thing and I noticed Emma Watson didn’t insist Belle be played by a Black girl, but perverting historical record is fascist, next they’ll be deleting people from photos instead of cropping and painting over the skin of portraits in galleries.

Feminists should be pissed because this is seen as a half-measure from casting a black MAN, as if the women were inferior in import and expendable.

It’s like when we all pretended Rihanna looked good blonde to be polite instead of admitting she looked fake like a stripper. It’s jarring to see a black girl (well, brown) Act White. It’s like a Wigger but in reverse, just wrong. Where’s the cultural appropriation people for white people’s hair colour? Oh, magically they cease to give a shit, like the rest of us.

This is oddly racist against the Irish, more of whom were slaves than black people, period. [read a book, seriously]

I’m tagging this as anti-white because the Irish have all the recessive traits including distinctive red freckles (MJ = Irish) often with green/blue eyes, genetics win this round. This Z-list girl looks the opposite of MJ, total miscast on purpose because they expect character fans will always show up anyway out of loyalty (but reason to execs this will attract the black girl demo, that hate SFF unless a black girl is cast, so …they hate SFF full stop, it’s all Mary Sue-ing) – not so in reality for both $$$ claims, not with so many properties on the market at once, hiring some social media bint is demeaning to us all just put in a fucking Kardashian you PC-peddling scum ruining ART.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

inb4: I would support a Kardashian hired in the role because at least it would be entertaining.

Footnotes:

margaretgeorge.com/adventures-in-research/2010/10/entering-the-world-of-helen-of-troy/

Up until the last couple of centuries, ‘black’ as a descriptor of women referred to HAIR. It was presumed by skin that all women were white, and where black, the particular geography was mentioned instead. Helen’s hair was not mentioned but her fair skin was, and even if brown as a half-way measure, women frequently dyed it. Fairness of flesh was picked up on as a class cue, implying fairness of eyes and hair, which crowds rarely saw so it didn’t matter much.

biographyonline.net/women/cleopatra.html

She was a member of the Ptolemaic dynasty, a family of Greek origin that ruled Egypt after Alexander the Great’s death during the Hellenistic period. The Ptolemies, throughout their dynasty, spoke Greek and refused to speak Egyptian, which is the reason that Greek as well as Egyptian languages were used on official court documents such as the Rosetta Stone. By contrast, Cleopatra did learn to speak Egyptian and represented herself as the reincarnation of an Egyptian goddess, Isis.

I know I’ll still get some “it doesn’t matter”s and “you’re racist for discussing race” people trying to write ALL this proof off.

  1. If it doesn’t matter, don’t alter the casting.
  2. It’s a conversation on pop culture, when you bring up race, it is on the table for everyone to discuss EQUALLY because this isn’t a Race Powertrip Studies class where you can preach solo and silence groups you hate, oppressively.

Also, we’re now so far into counter-signalling that trannies are turning anti-LGBT to call trannies ‘trannies’ and degenerates. What a time to be alive. You’re still a dude in a dress Blaire, but it’s been fun. It’s like when Roosh tried to be a white supremacist for edge points or that honest Holocaust documentary Jew was called anti-Semitic.

what wut wtf shock surprise slow turn eh littlefinger pause got

Link: The real politics of geek culture is class politics

http://www.themarysue.com/geek-culture-consumer-culture/

This stuff is expensive.

The time investment alone cuts out the working class. They’re at work.

The most grating Middle Class habit is assuming everyone can afford the same things as you, it’s a version of the anchoring effect. The Middle Class are not the norm and need be reminded of this.

Study shows fake geeks are extraverted narcissists

http://elitedaily.com/social-news/geeks-more-likely-narcissists-science/1330197/

We already know, they keep blocking up the lines to conventions and raising ticket prices. Now you can’t go to ONE of those things without the shoals of ‘popular people’ bumping into you (because to them, you’re still invisible). It’s like hey, I came here to get away from you people! You have tons of places to call your own! Aren’t the festivals enough?

They would’ve found the opposite if they’d studied geeks before being one became ‘cool’. Maybe they should replicate once it does go totally out of fashion, I sense that shift is already happening.

Now, by pure volume, most geeks are not real geeks. There used to be very few of us, so few that, in a given area, we’d all be on first name terms with one another and our respective interests (because LAN Internet). What do I mean by fakes? As in, they wouldn’t be seen dead doing half that stuff if it weren’t already trendy. And they have to post selfies to prove it.

It’s become an image, aping an identity. Ironic cultural appropriation.

The issue with social science is that it assumes the membership of a group is a stable quantity. With demographics, this holds. Sex, age range, race, nationality, all work fine.

When you involve social status, that assumption is false. In the mad scramble over social media, it never stops. It’s the musical chairs of our age.

Think of the geeks you knew at school as a ratio of the whole school itself. I knew, like, 5/1000, tops. That isn’t even one of a hundred.

And how do you count it? People who like certain (populist) films do not count. Yet I bet they went by markers i.e. wearing t-shirts, quoting a mediocre film or liking it on Facebook….

eyeroll jessica jones omg wtf shut up

So yeah, fake geeks are only there for attention, what a groundbreaking discovery.

Further reading for further fun-poking

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/redux-an-open-letter-to-feminists-pushing-in-on-fandom-fun/

The Man In the High Castle is SJW-proof

Yesterday it got renewed for a second season.

The SJWs are finally leaving a piece of geek culture alone, because the very premise triggers them and even admitting to watching or liking the show would open them up among their fellow SJWs to accusations of endorsing Nazism so it’s well worth a watch. They can’t even call it bad because it’s been getting rave reviews (likely in response to the SJW control of recent years, this is like a breath of fresh air). By far, the best thing about it is Rufus Sewell as a Nazi officer, that character needs more screen time.

The final episode surprised me.

Latest: Nordic culture is racist

http://www.infowars.com/more-things-that-are-now-racist-thor-heavy-metal-music-viking-cosplay/

“The bands in the research are all trying to identify with some reputed folk culture that existed before modern timesa culture of pure white people, mono-cultural and mono-racial. In some bands, there is an explicitly racist purpose for their adoption of Thor’s hammers, Viking imagery and heroic pagan myths,” said Spracklen.

….Yeah. We’re celebrating our existence.

Our Gods.
Our clothing.
Our music.

Yet I see all these immigrants dressing up as classic European characters, including Princesses.

I have seen Muslims dress up as Vikings. It was horrific. No one said a word.

I have seen Indians wear contacts and draw on Irish freckles and nobody wanted to point out how racist that is.

 

Link: Geek, nerd subculture and SJW entryism

http://thefutureprimaeval.net/entryism-as-exploited-containment-failure-between-subcultures/

Once they are cool, they have to start worrying about people coming in because they are cool, or because they are something that is happening that can be captured and redirected for other purposes.

Simple test: can they contribute? No? Only Critical Theory? Boot them out. They are parasites and leeches of status and money. Apolitical topics should never allow politics. This is common sense. They’re using you as a platform.

Would it be a cheap shot to say they can’t police their borders?
Let alone remove treasonous violators who would sell them out? Clue: if they’re trying to change who you are and what you do (the things that define you), they are Other.

They seem to think playing by the rules is better than winning.

If the other guys are cheating, the game rules no longer apply. There’s nothing noble in losing and it doesn’t make you the better person to lose deliberately for a vague excuse of principle (I’ve heard it called winning the moral battle).

are you kidding me rn seriously wtf da vincis demons

How many abortions is it a year now, Conservatives? Sure, ‘moral’ battle….

When it comes to the culture war….

They choose to lose and call it Principle.