“Native Americans” a myth

http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask41

“Also the language spoken by some Native American people closely resembles ancient Asian languages.”

They’re trying to whitewash how they conquered that land by using the multiple migrations line, like it was all peaceful and refugee signs.

“Some years ago archeologists found the remains of an ancient settlement in Chile. They were surprised to find that it was 12,500 years old. This is much more ancient than the Clovis People! Also, the skeletons found in this site resemble more the people of Polynesia than the inhabitants of Siberia. The theory is that these people may have arrived by boat to America from Polynesia. Now we believe that there were separate groups of people who came to America from Asia.”

And what did they find there?

No people whatsoever?

Pull the other one.

“Scientists looked at mtDNA from many Native Americans and many Asians. They were surprised again. Based on their DNA, Native Americans belong to five different groups. Groups 1-4 are closely related to Asian people. The fifth group is most closely related European or Western Asian people! So it seems most Native Americans are originally from Asia and as you said fundamentally Asian. However, it seems there are some whose origins are from Europe

You don’t think the Spanish had anything to do with that last bit?
Notice the concealment of saying Truth OR easily explained Lie.

This is also why you don’t take the current population donating genes for the original population by label.

See Turkey for a wealth of examples.

NatGeo, who recently sank to the depth of letting Emma Watson use one of their accounts, corroborates this lie.

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/11/131120-science-native-american-people-migration-siberia-genetics/

“Great Surprise”—Native Americans Have West Eurasian Origins

Yes, it is a great surprise to anyone who reads. When we showed up, they didn’t live in a White-level culture. They were still shitting anywhere like animals (China still has this problem), using women like animals (Middle East) and living a primitive lifestyle, like animals.

Red =/= White.

The only “white supremacy” I’ve ever seen is how every other race tries to claim at some point that they’re secretly actually white to dilute the term and borrow achievements. No, go to another treehouse.

“Oldest human genome reveals less of an East Asian ancestry than thought.” One study by liars = fuck-all.

Noble savage photo because why not?

We introduced horses but ignore that fact.

https://www.livescience.com/9589-surprising-history-america-wild-horses.html

“The last prehistoric North American horses died out between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene” the noble savages ate them

“It is well known that domesticated horses were introduced into North America beginning with the Spanish conquest”

Back to NatGeo

“The study authors believe the new study could also help resolve some long-standing puzzles on the peopling of the New World, which include genetic oddities and archaeological inconsistencies.

That happens when your field has almost as many liars as social psychology.

For those not in the know

Fields by penetration of liars:

  1. theoretical physics, where no idea is ever stupid enough (we’ll find something eventually, give us money)
  2. social psychology and sociology, social pathologies (illegal since the time of Stalin*)
  3. forensics and genetics, archaeology including cultural (you are not who you think you are, give us money)

For 2, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union

Sub*: (you are all sinners against the State and we can help you, give us money)

“I hadn’t expected anything like this. A genome related to present-day western Eurasian populations and modern Native Americans as well was really puzzling in the beginning. How could this happen?”

Uhuh.

Only Eurasian though, huh?

You couldn’t go the full hog and say exclusively European. There is no Eurasian. It’s a labeling convention.

“DNA from the remains revealed genes found today in western Eurasians in the Middle East and Europe,”

See? Do you see why the bit above now? The assumption is false. The whole thing after falls apart.

“humans occupied this region of Siberia throughout the entire brutally cold period of the Last Glacial Maximum, which ended about 13,000 years ago.”

Humans never migrated during the Ice Age….

“This study changes this idea because it shows that a significant minority of Native American ancestry actually derives not from East Asia but from a people related to present-day western Eurasians,” Willerslev said.

Well, does that mean the Asians 4/5 genome invaded and slaughtered the European part?
If only there were a name for such an event.

“The meeting of those two groups is what formed Native Americans as we know them.”

Meeting? Like, round a table or a stump…?

I hope you’re learning how to spot this.

“Although we know that North Americans are related to East Asians, it’s striking that no contemporary East Asian populations really resemble Native Americans,” he said.

Wait, race is not only real but biological, traceable and you can SEE it?

“It’s not like you can say that they are really closely related

sub-race

to Japanese, Chinese, or Koreans, so there seems to be something missing. But this result makes a lot of sense regarding why they don’t fit so well genetically with contemporary

maybe they’re primal ones? Occam’s Razor.

East Asians—because one-third of their genome is derived from another population.”

That’s called rape. You think the Spanish just decided to stop playing nice one day?

The findings could also allow reinterpretation of archaeological and anthropological evidence, like the famed Kennewick Man, whose remains don’t look much like modern-day Native American or East Asian populations, according to some interpretations.

There it is, the money shot. The purpose for doing the study and publishing in Nature. As an excuse to twist and hide other, real findings. I knew it.

Kennewick Man isn’t allowed to be an original settler of different racial composition because it doesn’t fit the Narrative. Calling one group Native when they’re not is really, really biased?

“Maybe, if he looks like something else

Suddenly ambiguous “scientist”.

Many questions remain unanswered, including where and when the mixing of west Eurasian and East Asian populations occurred.

trans. This lie is not consistent but fuck you, we’re going with it.

The Siberian child “was found buried with all kinds of cultural items, including Venus figurines, which have been found from Lake Baikal west all the way to Europe.

Yes, I’m sure he was a feminist. It can’t have been a sculpture of his mother to play with?

Why do all found objects of women have to be sexual? It’s a kid, it’s a toy.

“So now we know”

yes, that’s how science works

“the individual represented with this culture is a western Eurasian, even though he was found very far east.”

Sample of one. No. Where are your boundary lines?

He could’ve just moved or been isolated by the weather conditions. No guarantee he permanently lived there.

“It’s an interesting question how closely related this individual might have been to the individuals carving these figurines at the same time in Europe and elsewhere.”

Now the exclusively European thing comes in. AFTER all the “evidence”, with this one guy’s opinion.

There is no white people apparently, only shades of Asian. That’s the new narrative. White people don’t exist, never existed. Sure, Asians can’t do dairy but if you dare suggest that was evolution, why, you’re basically Hitler.

This guy’s opinion

“The scientific enterprise that Dr. Willerslev helped invent now sometimes crosses into culturally sensitive terrain.”

He’s the standard but he can’t, like, lie to us with it.

“Last June, he and his colleagues published the genome of an 8,500-year-old skeleton from Washington State known as Kennewick Man, or the Ancient One.”

Well, he got what he wanted. In 2015.

“During his research, Dr. Willerslev met with representatives from the tribes. One tribe agreed to donate DNA for his study.

Kennewick Man, Dr. Willerslev and his colleagues concluded, was related to living Native Americans.”

Pings to me. Why wouldn’t you follow procedure and publish the ancient DNA first, in public, THEN compare to known tribes, plural?
Do you know the odds of that, based on the diversity of the tribes alone? It happens to match this one guy? Do you know how astronomically unlikely that is? He just happens to shoot a bulls-eye on horseback from 500 yards away.

I wonder what his political motive is:

“The Yukaghir were not an exotic tribe living in utter isolation. In fact, virtually all of them could count Russians and people from other ethnic groups among their ancestors.”

Prior study: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/247747.php

In what they describe as the most comprehensive survey of genetic diversity in Native Americans

clue: more than one guy

so far, the researchers studied variation in Native American DNA sequences.

not matches, magical pixie dust matches

They found that while most Native American populations descend primarily from one migration, there were two later ones that also made a significant genetic contribution.

The first migration, that led to the majority of Native American populations, was of a single group called the “First Americans” that crossed from Asia to America in a land bridge called Beringia, that existed during the ice ages more than 15,000 years ago, say the researchers, whose efforts were co-ordinated by Professor Andres Ruiz-Linares of the department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College London (UCL) in the UK.

“The Asian lineage leading to First Americans is the most anciently diverged, whereas the Asian lineages that contributed some of the DNA to Eskimo-Aleut speakers and the Na-Dene-speaking Chipewyan from Canada are more closely related to present-day East Asian populations,” says Reich.

Contrast this with Mr They’re NOT Related to Japanese/Chinese/Koreans.
Someone is lying.

It appears that 50% of the DNA of Eskimo-Aleut speakers comes from the First Americans, while in the Na-Dene-speaking Chipewyans, 90% of their DNA descends from the First Americans.

In the West-East re-mix, it seems some Eskimo-Aleut speakers migrated back to Asia, as the genomes of Naukan and coastal Chukchi populations of north-eastern Siberia carry some “First American” DNA.

Backwash truth, not original lies. Fuck you, first guy. This one actually conducted his research first by date but isn’t in National Geographic.

The analysis was not straightforward, because the researchers had to find a way to rule out genes from the European and African populations that arrived in the Americas from the late 15th century onwards.

Bold theirs. That time.

Ruiz-Linares says they managed to develop a method to “peel back” the addition of those genes to the mix, which he says “allowed us to study the history of many more Native American populations than we could have done otherwise”.

The team included researchers from: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, France, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the US.

Point me the better study.

You know it’s important when the Guardian gets on board and sticks in an oar.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jan/03/ancient-dna-reveals-previously-unknown-group-of-native-americans-ancient-beringians

“This is a new population of Native Americans,” said Eske Willerslev

Guess from that line.

2018 – new race guys! I just tripped over one this time! I dunno why these groundbreaking new findings keep happening to me!

compared the genetic makeup of the baby, named Xach’itee’aanenh t’eede gaay or “sunrise child-girl” by the local community, with genomes from other ancient and modern people. 

Old + New = Old but also New? WTF.

Why not just publish the girl’s DNA alone THEN… oh, nevermind. You know, you know.

They found that nearly half of the girl’s DNA came from the ancient north Eurasians who lived in what is now Siberia.

white?

The rest of her genetic makeup was a roughly even mix of DNA now carried by the northern and southern Native Americans.

how

literally, how does that work? And both? Despite little to no admixture, in the other guy’s study?

“Using evolutionary models”

Oh, okay, he just made it up.

“About 25,000 years ago, this group mixed and bred with ancient north Eurasians in the region”

Lies you will like, in newspaper form.

Is that a snide reference to conquest and rape? Denying the backflow? Who knows, it’s so vague you could throw a kitchen sink in there and make it work.

Those who settled in the north became the isolated ancient Beringians, he said, while those who moved south, around or through the ice sheets, split into the north and south Native Americans about 15,700 years ago.”

So you found …nothing.

The other guy said about the initial migration. You just made up a name and stuck it (see the issue with shitty labels?) on an already-known group. A purer group.

But there is another possibility. Ben Potter, an archaeologist on the team from the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, suspects that the Beringians split from the ancestors

that’s called a race

of other Native Americans in Asia

are they Asian or not?

before both groups made their way across the land bridge to North America in separate migrations. “The support for this scenario is pretty strong,” he said. “We have no evidence of people in the Beringia region 20,000 years ago.”

translation: We have no convenient evidence of Asians in the region.

To piss some people off: Absence of  evidence is not evidence of absence.
If only their job were getting evidence.

Like a real scientist.

I may not be an expert on fishing but something doesn’t smell right about this.

Connie Mulligan, an anthropologist at the University of Florida, said the findings pointed to a single migration of people from Asia to the New World, but said other questions remained.

Questions like, what are you smoking?

My money is on Benjamins from the taxpayer. I’m right, aren’t I?

You aren’t allowed to notice the black swans and maybe it will go away, maybe people will forget.

He added that he was unconvinced that the ancient Beringian group split from the ancestors of other Native Americans 20,000 years ago, because even tiny errors in scientists’ data can lead to radically different split times for evolutionary lineages.

Oh, the Harvard guy can science. Excellent.

Nice to know someone’s almonds are shaking.

Yes, “errors.”

When this fraud comes out, can the people doing it go to prison, please? If you robbed the Fed directly they would but if there’s academic fraud…. suddenly they can play dumb?

It even happens in cancer research: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/03/cancer-researcher-ohio-state-university-resigns-following-multiple-misconduct-findings

Guess the race of the guy cheating. Clue: same as Eton.

I didn’t know – when it was their job, they accepted money to do?

They actively applied for this money, and suggested they did know?

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/07/mysterious-link-emerges-between-native-americans-and-people-half-globe-away

Both detect in modern Native Americans a trace of DNA related to that of native people from Australia and Melanesia.

American Indians actually aborigines?

They concluded

falsely

that all Native Americans, ancient and modern, stem from a single source population in Siberia that split from other Asians around 23,000 years ago and moved into the now-drowned land of Beringia.

We wuz Siberians.

But the Science team also found a surprising dash of Australo-Melanesian DNA in some living Native Americans, including those of the Aleutian Islands and the Surui people of Amazonian Brazil.

They looked for evidence?!

And found it?!

I am shook.

Some anthropologists had previously suggested an Australo-Melanesian link.

So it isn’t new.

They noted that certain populations of extinct Native Americans

who killed ’em

(hint: other “Native Americans”)

had long, narrow skulls, resembling those of some Australo-Melanesians

everything skull is phrenology people in the distance, stampeding

distinct from the round, broad skulls of most Native Americans.

They’d love to say that isn’t science.

That’s a typical Asian skill btw.

drew on a different source population in Asia. A similar claim was made for the Kennewick Man, the iconic 8500-year-old skeleton from Washington state, but was refuted when his genome was published by this team last month: He is related only to Native Americans

Was it?

And doesn’t that strike anyone as unusual at all?

The Science results also counter the Paleoamerican model. When the team sequenced the DNA of 17 individuals from the extinct South American populations with the distinctive skulls, they found no trace of Australo-Melanesian ancestry.

No trace? What could this mean?

I’m sure they’ll tell us what to think, hold onto your European horses.

So how did living South Americans get a dose of this Australo-Melanesian DNA?

this nobody can deny, nobody can deny!

“A possible explanation is that the connection reflects more recent gene flow,” says Science co-lead author Eske Willerslev

That guy. Again.

You see, once something is refuted, nobody bothers to double-check it for… centuries.

Don’t question the High Priests of Science, kids! Ignorant is the new Evil!

This is a unique situation because there were two studies on the same subject in the same field published at the same time. Hence my spotlight. One of them is either innocently misguided (uhuh) or lying.

Hubbe, however, counters that the study could have missed telltale DNA in the ancient populations because its sample size is “extremely small.” geneticist David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston and leader of the Nature team, agrees, noting that the genomes from the 17 ancient relict populations are incomplete and provide very low coverage.

I wonder which is which….

Hubbe, however, counters that the study could have missed

he knows, he knows they’re full of it

That’s the “bitch, I KNOW you iz lying” of academia.

telltale DNA

actual evidence

in the ancient populations because its sample size is “extremely small.”

fuck-all

geneticist David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston and leader of the Nature team, agrees, noting that the genomes from the 17 ancient relict populations are incomplete

they know this before doing it

and provide very low coverage.

Planned, totally planned. They don’t care about the methodology, only what they falsely conclude and agree to, ahead of time.

Well, when in doubt, the guy getting the most coverage in the Guardian is lying.

His own paper also finds this mysterious Australo-Melanesian DNA in some of the same modern populations 

Look for evidence, it pops up!

reaches a different conclusion about its source. His team analyzed partial genome sequences of 106 Native Americans from 25 populations in Central and South America, and compared them with DNA data from 197 populations from outside the Americas.

Which is the better method, I dunno.

through a now extinct population they call “Population Y”

note no stupid new naming labels for the idiot-papers

that may have lived somewhere in East Asia and contributed genes to both very early Paleoamericans and to Australo-Melanesians.

That fits!

That fits the evidence around us so much better!

Let’s go back to 2001

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11543902

We have been studying polymorphisms of HLA class I and II genes in East Asians including Buryat in Siberia, Mongolian, Han Chinese, Man Chinese, Korean Chinese, South Korean, and Taiwan indigenous populations in collaboration with many Asian scientists.

Regional populations in Japan, Hondo-Japanese, Ryukyuan, and Ainu, were also studied. HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 gene frequencies were subjected to the correspondence analysis and calculation of DA distances.

See JF’s video what is white? for genetic distances.

The correspondence analysis demonstrated several major clusters of human populations in the world.

Hmm.

“Mongoloid” populations were highly diversified, in which several clusters such as Northeast Asians, Southeast Asians, Oceanians, and Native Americans were observed. Interestingly, an indigenous population in North Japan, Ainu, was placed relatively close to Native Americans in the correspondence analysis.

Think back to Mr They Can’t Be Related To Japanese, where’s the evidence?
One google search, you POS.

Distribution of particular HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 alleles and haplotypes was also analyzed in relation to migration and dispersal routes of ancestral populations. A number of alleles and haplotypes showed characteristic patterns of regional distribution. For example, B39-HR5-DQ7 (B*3901-DRB1*1406-DQB1*0301) was shared by Ainu and Native Americans.

specific alleles not good enough for you?

They are more Japanese than they could ever be Siberian.

A24-Cw8-B48 was commonly observed in Taiwan indigenous populations, Maori in New Zealand, Orochon in Northeast China, Inuit, and Tlingit.

subraces also apply in Asians, true

These findings further support the genetic link between East Asians and Native Americans. We have proposed that various ancestral populations in East Asia, marked by different HLA haplotypes, had migrated and dispersed through multiple routes. Moreover, relatively small genetic distances and the sharing of several HLA haplotypes between Ainu and Native Americans suggest that these populations are descendants of some Upper Paleolithic populations of East Asia.

So-called modern “Native Americans” are genetic Asians, deal with it.

We can look one allele at a time.

We can specify the types of Asian they are and are not.

Now for some Asian slavery to round things off, I’m tired.

There are plenty of studies like this if you actually cared to look.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707606557

However, this, together with other odd features of the island’s Y-chromosomal gene pool, is best explained as the genetic impact of a 19th century Peruvian slave trade in Polynesia.

These findings underscore the need to account for history before turning to prehistory

you can’t say that’s ancient unless modern is discounted entirely

and the value of archival research to understanding modern genetic diversity. Although the impact of the Atlantic slave trade on the distribution of modern genetic diversity has been well appreciated, this represents the first study investigating the impact of this underappreciated episode on genetic diversity in the Pacific.

 

 

DNA can distinguish Europeans from Jews

https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r7

So much for white passing.

This is one test you shall not pass.

Ripped shamelessly off of JF.

A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans

So much for the “science can’t-” crowd.

It was recently shown that the genetic distinction between self-identified Ashkenazi Jewish and non-Jewish individuals is a prominent component of genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in European Americans. No study however has yet assessed how accurately self-identified (Ashkenazi) Jewish ancestry can be inferred from genomic information, nor whether the degree of Jewish ancestry can be inferred among individuals with fewer than four Jewish grandparents.

When are we testing Hitler, I demand answers.

Here we show that within Americans of European ancestry there is a perfect genetic corollary of Jewish ancestry which, in principle, would permit near perfect genetic inference of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.

Because if they look the same, they must be the same! – Reddit

In another world, they’d be summoning spirit animals and making voodoo dolls.

In fact, even subjects with a single Jewish grandparent can be statistically distinguished from those without Jewish ancestry.

Israel, after advancing genetics testing:

We also found that subjects with Jewish ancestry were slightly more heterozygous than the subjects with no Jewish ancestry, suggesting that the genetic distinction between Jews and non-Jews may be more attributable to a Near-Eastern origin for Jewish populations than to population bottlenecks.

Translation: A different race.

Male beauty = good genes

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1690211/

Please, stop denying this. It isn’t very red pill of you.

There’s sufficient text there to see it’s a concrete connection – not limited to symmetry, not vanishing upon single-side presentation, please stop denying this. It’s getting difficult to watch.

Full paper because there’s always that one guy where you can tell what he looks like through the screen, like a fat acceptance activist.

Click to access 1999_scheibetal.pdf

Just because they’re scared to use the word beauty in connection to men doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist, insecure men are worse than SJWs sometimes.

These studies ain’t hard to find.

You manosphere types are just lyin’.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11487409

Symmetry is actually a misnomer, since symmetry is a feature of feminine beauty.

It was recently proposed that symmetry is not a primary cue to facial attractiveness, as symmetrical faces remain attractive even when presented as half faces (with no cues to symmetry).

This is the issue with treating the sexes as the same, especially in evo studies?!?!???

Here, we use real and computer graphic male faces in order to demonstrate that (i) symmetric faces are more attractive, but not reliably more masculine than less symmetric faces and (ii) that symmetric faces possess characteristics that are attractive independent of symmetry, but that these characteristics remain at present undefined.

I don’t see men arguing we must study this for equality’s sake. [but we should]

They seem to prefer ignorance.

Harder to lie about your alpha genes when it’s literally written on your face.*
Deep down, they know. That’s why so many ‘players’ get plastic surgery.

But women are fake, right, guys?

*again, alpha is a pair and a breeding couple, not an individual, it refers to a social rank

Chromosomes make culture, including language

Language is genetic, and it’s racial.

https://www.mpg.de/19395/Language_genetics

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/409215/the-genetics-of-language/
FOXP2 mutations exist in humans and we still count them as human despite the devolution (atavism) being common to chimps. For the same reason you can look like a long-dead relative, humans can have pre-human mutations. This is likely the (un-PC) explanation behind retardation and certain other disability in the nervous system. You’ve heard people can be maladapted for the modern world (low IQ) well, how about maladapted in any environment? Full stop. In every generation, those mutations re-emerge but less so over time since they don’t procreate.

“They connected FOXP2 to more than 200 genes that control the development of neurons, the release of neurotransmitters that send messages between nerves, and the changes in synapses that underlie learning and memory. Some of these genes will very likely turn out to be involved in speech and language.”
When people act like one gene between two groups isn’t a big deal, you can tell they’re thinking in ratios and not in biology. Your heuristic of enough is wrong.
“Geschwind has been captivated by this asymmetry, and by its relationship to handedness. Roughly 90 percent of us are right-handed, and nearly all righties depend on that left “perisylvian” region for speech and language. (About 40 percent of lefties instead rely on the right peri­sylvian region or use both hemispheres.) “There’s some kind of benefit to the kind of processing that’s going on in language–which is extremely rapid processing–to keep everything in one circuit in one hemisphere,” he concludes.”
Handedness being genetic and based on the nervous system. The brain is also part of the nervous system.
That would be the logical next step, to use the full brain. There are no racial studies on handedness.
“Francks and his colleagues could not corroborate that suggestion, but they did find a region of chromosome 2 that seemed linked to left-handedness. They then examined the DNA of pairs of healthy left-handed brothers: the same linkage to chromosome 2 surfaced, evidence that a gene or genes in that region might influence handedness.”
Again, one chromosome and a huge effect.
“They found four DNA differences that distinguished the schizophrenics from the mentally healthy lefties; the location of these variations led them to a gene called LRRTM1. Geschwind collaborated in the work that helped identify where in the human brain LRRTM1 was turned on, or expressed: it probably helps shape forebrain structures and influences how neurons connect.”
Imagine if we applied these methods to other concepts.
Neurogenetics.
“Moving from correlations between genes and disorders to knowledge of the neural circuitry that allows a human but not a chimp to ask, “To be, or not to be?” requires researchers to find connections between seemingly disparate findings.”
Like all races have a ton of Shakespeare level art. Where?
“Linguists and psychologists who have studied “talking apes,” including researchers who have taught them to communicate, stress that the animals rarely combine even two words into a semantic whole and never utter the type of complex “recursive” sentence–like this one–that embeds one thought in another.”
Possible to answer what is white by what is chimp?
These questions are old as Darwin. Genus>Species>Race. Undeniable. I can no less be non-white than a non-mammal.
“In the hope of beginning to explain this discrepancy, Geschwind investigated which genes are turned on in the brains of humans and in those of chimpanzees, our closest genetic relatives. He found hundreds of differences but had no way to determine which ones mattered–which were most significant in driving evolution and determining brain function. Overwhelmed, he turned to a mathe­matician friend at UCLA, Steve Horvath.
With Horvath’s guidance, Geschwind and his grad student Michael Oldham arrived at a new way to approach the problem. Rather than looking at differences between individual genes, they analyzed differences between networks of genes expressed at the same time.”
“It became startlingly clear not only which genes are uniquely human, but also which of those are most important.”
Race-mixing is risky because mutations are usually very bad for the fitness of the organism.
“Biologists believe that if proteins undergo little alteration over an evolutionary span of tens of millions of years, they must perform such essential functions that they simply cannot tolerate change.”
They aren’t as tailored to the old environment, or its pressures but the temporary social one.

Have you noticed African-Americans, left to their own devices, switch to speech patterns more common to Africa, compared with European Americans, who switch to European modes? It’s the little things. Bear in mind, this is after Africans were mixed for centuries.

Fake scientists are already trying to conflate language with racial classification, despite admitting you can learn if you start early enough, a language you wouldn’t naturally conform to.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-01837-7
“the vast majority (97.3%) of individuals have mixed ancestry” then the term is meaningless, you’re conflating the species with the sub-species (race) and who are the exception?
“The data indicate that continents, ethno-linguistic groups, races, ethnicities, and individuals all show substantial ancestral heterogeneity. We estimated correlation coefficients ranging from 0.522 to 0.962 between ancestries and language families or branches.”
If language and race are so tied, if language is real…
“Initial efforts to characterize the movement of early humans in relation to ancestry grouped populations according to five geographical regions: Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe/the Middle East/Central Asia/South Asia, East Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. Subsequent analyses allowed for refinement of the genetic history of global ancestries, revealing regional structure through the identification of 7, 14, and 19 ancestries.”
And you don’t believe in race?
If you don’t believe in gravity, jump off a cliff. You’ll float.
The language/race correlation has clear genetic evidence elsewhere of causation and those same genes are also racial markers because races by geography differ in language structure.

Wait, so wouldn’t it work the other way? you ask, shitposting me.

Yes.

Yes, it would.

https://news.stanford.edu/2015/01/30/language-genes-compare-012915/

Multiregional?
Impossible…
“Now, scientists at Stanford and other universities have combined large databases of globally distributed linguistic and genetic data, revealing in greater detail how languages might change in parallel with genes.”
“Through an advanced statistical analysis, the authors found that geographic distance was linked to both genetic and phonemic distance. On average, the closer together two languages or two genetic samples were to one another, the more similar they were, even when the languages compared were not in the same language family.”
If genetic distance seems familiar, that’s the gap between races.
It doesn’t exist between sexes because a white woman can give birth to a white male, a white man can father a white female. Good luck trying that with race, if it isn’t genetic.

Click to access 5620.full.pdf


http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003460
“Numerous studies of human populations in Europe and Asia have revealed a concordance between their extant genetic structure and the prevailing regional pattern of geography and language.”
Different people are different. Groundbreaking.
You can’t talk immigrants out of their genetic neural structures.
They won’t be uplifted being surrounded by white people, they’ll sink lower and lower from inbreeding until their envy provokes a civil war. You can’t bus in new brains.

In other news, Lombroso’s concept of criminal atavism has largely been proven, with the genetics of criminology and behavioural genetics coming to the fore.

Update: I should’ve given you search terms.

Look up left realism, right realism, Instrumental Marxism and Marxist criminology. All of these are real. Why is crime so bad? Well… there are a lot of liars after that human rights money. Ignore biocriminology at your peril, but they care about all the new rape victims. At least, their bank manager cares a lot.

“What is white?”

http://genome.cshlp.org/content/14/9/1679.full

I knew I had the reference somewhere.
Racial allele gradients needn’t be precise to count for categorization, Sargon.
The absence of so-called discrete clusters would be expected WITHIN a species.
Race = sub-species.
The weasel word in the abstract is “major”.
The PDF is free.
Discontinuity is itself an arbitrary concept, depending how you crunch the numbers.

Genographic Southeast Asia

https://voices.nationalgeographic.org/2015/04/21/genographic-southeast-asia/

Oh look, more migrations they try to shoehorn into Out of Africa but actually fits Multiregional better.

I am shocked at the continual efforts to bury lies with genetic truth.

Over half of SE Asian males? At least the Yellow Fever acolytes have new reading material.

For exactly what type of cuck they are, on a precise genetic level.

Microcephalin and racial brain size

The skulls thing was popular so here.
*gestures wildly*

http://evoandproud.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-riddle-of-microcephalin.html

So what is going on? Perhaps the derived Microcephalin allele helps us on a mental task that IQ tests fail to measure. Or perhaps it boosts intelligence in some indirect way that shows up in differences between populations but not in differences between individuals.

What would the term for that be?

The second explanation is the one favored in a recent study byWoodley et al. (2014). The authors found a high correlation (r = 0.79) between the incidence of this allele and a population’s estimated mean IQ, using a sample of 59 populations from throughout the world.

They also found a correlation with a lower incidence of infectious diseases, as measured by DALY (disability adjusted life years). They go on to argue that this allele may improve the body’s immune response to viral infections, thus enabling humans to survive in larger communities, which in turn would have selected for increased intelligence:

Hello, Mutation Load!

Come on down!

And since the brain has been proven part of the immune system since, the theory holds.
The Ice Age hypothesis in A Troublesome Inheritance appears to hold weight, the notion of tribal bonding. Altruism is only pathological if its exertion harms your genetic kin, your ingroup.

There are plenty of HBD blogs, people. Read!

Genetics? In science? What is this witchcraft! Both medical studies and hips don’t lie. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-11-african-american-women-diabetes-higher-er-neg.html

Turns out Africans in particular have terrible health out of the environment they evolved for.
Maybe racism has just been migration this entire time.
If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree…

Lower than savages

Does that even count as a standard or a civilization?

https://stepfeed.com/egyptian-cleric-cites-imam-saying-men-can-marry-their-illegitimate-daughters-0118

Egyptian Salafist cleric Mazen Al-Sersawi has stirred controversy, after a video in which he suggested that Islam allows men to marry their illegitimate daughters went viral.

In the video, Al-Azhar lecturer cites prominent Muslim jurist Imam Al-Shafi’i as saying that illegitimate daughters are not officially attributed to their fathers and can thus be married to them.

This is what they do. I knew this, I am playing shocked for laughs.
Deliberately inbreed. It’s the plan.
If the West hadn’t saved them from famine multiple times, they’d all be dead.

In the 2012 video that recently resurfaced online, he said Imam Al-Shafi’i – one of the four great Imams of Islamic jurisprudence – is known for saying men may marry their own daughters that are born out of wedlock.

Bear in mind, the punishment for adultery is death.

Al-Sersawi explained that if a man has extramarital intercourse with a woman and impregnates her, he is allowed to marry his illegitimate daughter.

Attempting to rationalize the repulsive ruling, Al-Sersawi said that according to Al-Shafi’i, the girl is “not really his daughter” since she is the result of adultery.

“She is not his daughter according to Sharia. She is not officially attributed to him,” he said, adding that illegitimate daughters do not carry their fathers’ names.

Look at the birth defects.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/children/11723308/First-cousin-marriages-in-Pakistani-communities-leading-to-appalling-disabilities-among-children.html

Marrying your cousin once might be necessary, look at the Queen.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/theres-nothing-wrong-with-cousins-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html

A single instance is fine. This is not one family nor a one-time thing.

Repeating it and preferring it when there are other options is the taboo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest_taboo
To say it’s less human than animal would be an insult to animals, who are also averse to inbreeding in many species.
Inbreeding means closer than a cousin, typically. Parent/child/siblings are all off-limits. Preferential cousin matches also count.

While Lévi-Strauss generally discounted the relevance of alliance theory in Africa, a particularly strong concern for incest is a fundamental issue among the age systems of East Africa. Here, the avoidance between men of an age-set and their daughters is altogether more intense than in any other sexual avoidance.

Africa is smarter than this. Literally, as you shall see.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-513388/Minister-Muslim-inbreeding-Britain-causing-massive-surge-birth-defects.html

Half of world’s Muslims are inbred due to generations of incest

But the problem isn’t exclusive to Pakistani Muslims as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among Muslims across the world.

Stop supporting the stupid.

Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity.” –  Robert A. Heinlein

They can’t support a civilization of any order and they won’t even support themselves.
Allah is their excuse to sit around expecting whitey will be their slave forever, like the Jews consider Gentiles. In either case, these are not a people with any type of prudence and/or Darwinian longevity.

The type to ask;

“Tasty seeds, where’s the next meal?”

R-selection, thy symbol is a plague of locust.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Cousin_Marriage_in_Islam#Science_and_Statistics

A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called “consanguinity”) and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent.[11]

Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen.[12][13]

Over time that converges to 100%.

https://en.europenews.dk/-Muslim-Inbreeding-Impacts-on-intelligence-sanity-health-and-society-78170.html

Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies:

Fair question: Why is it okay when nobility do it?
They already have HIGH IQ and they’re PRESERVING it.
From?
Genetic load from outsiders. It’s temporary, until better matches can be found for children and grandchildren.

So all these “why do Muslims not just wait?” questions fail to understand how easy they’d be to mow down with the army, if we only had the political will.

That’s a whole SD, below their already low IQ parents.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/fun-iq-list/

Pakistan 84 there.

This is a relatively consistent finding from my extensive research.

They’re already 1SD below UK average.
It isn’t racism, it’s them.

If you pit a sensible person who trains against a lazy one who sits around eating in a race, it isn’t mentally taxing to know who’ll probably win. Can you reason with that? Equality dogma is poison to console the loser. They don’t stand a chance according to Second World standards, let alone First!

They won’t stop being angry. They won’t get less angry. They can’t.

In the immortal words of Goethe, There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity.

*drops monocle, sarcastically slow claps*

Nothing. Worse. Goethe. Master.

I feel like he’d know this.

Lurk more – HBD blogs. It’s tough to be surprised after that.

Look at him go, with those little legs.

Inbreeding depression on Asian IQ

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8240214

A significant (p 0.001) negative association was found between inbreeding and score on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-C). In addition, the weighted mean IQ of inbred children )88.4 + or – 1.37) differed significant (p 0.001) from that recorded among 50 noninbred controls of similar age and socioeconomic status (99.6 + or – 2.0). The group means for both verbal and performance IQ subscales differed significantly and in the expected direction between subjects and controls…Additional surveys in other populations and for various inbreeding levels are recommended.

You can only deny this if you can’t do math.

Click to access IQ%20effects%20india.pdf

I know it’s mean to India, but have you looked at their population boom? There’s a billion of them, they chose to be poor because resources are finite but population needs to match.

A measurable IQ of 69 was found. ~titter~
Compared to the Indian average of 82, lower than Nigeria at 84.

Going back to the most recent national IQ list I posted, that would be lower than the national stated average of Kenya, South Africa, the Congo, Botswana and the Sudan. Rwanda is 70.
69 is the IQ of Ethiopia and Malawi.

Hey, I’m sure this doesn’t mean much, right? Globally.

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/03/17/islam-worlds-fastest-growing-religion-except-australia

Islam is also fastest growing religion in Europe. Can’t be all bad?

Of course, Islam did originate from Asia so it’s hardly surprising it’s spreading so fast.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Asia#Islam

 South Asia and Southeast Asia are home of the most populous Muslim countries, with IndonesiaPakistanIndia, and Bangladesh having more than 100 million adherents each. According to U.S. government figures, in 2006 there were 20 million Muslims in China. In the Western Asia, the non-Arab countries of Iran and Turkey are the largest Muslim-majority countries. In South Asia, Pakistan and Bangladesh are the countries with the largest Muslim-majority. In Central Asia, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan are the countries with the largest Muslim-majority.

The IQ values do not look promising.

http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/asia-pacific/

Muslims are projected to grow even faster and become the largest religious group in the region by mid-century. The Muslim population in Asia and the Pacific is expected to increase by almost 50% to nearly 1.5 billion in 2050.

Back to IQ. That pdf is formally here;

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01082310

A three-factor analysis of variance performed on the full-scale IQ scores indicated that both consanguinity and locality affect IQ.

Muslims studied, by a man called Mohammad, connection remained despite middle-class (wealthy) subjects.
I don’t think money will fix this.

Islam Inbreeding IQ and Aggression

Among the many birth defects that are the result of inbreeding are lower levels of IQ and higher levels of aggression. Yikes. That might explain the correlation for support for the brutal Islamic Law called “Sharia” and just how long a region has been Islamic.

According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred:

  • 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
  • 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
  • 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
  • 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
  • 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
  • 54% of Muslims in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
  • 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
  • In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
  • In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

I love it when others pull up good data.

https://pickeringpost.com/story/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316

IQ is a controversial subject, not because there are not loads of evidence pointing to how relevant IQ is. Rather, it is controversial because when you discuss it, you might hurt someone’s feelings. It is estimated that, worldwide, the average IQ for Muslims is 81. Research shows that intelligence can go down 10-16 points, if one’s parents are cousins.

The risk for having an IQ lower than 70, which is what we call in the West “retarded” increases by 400 percent among the offspring of first cousin marriages.

Islam is the fastest growing belief system (some call it a religion) in the world today. It is sweeping through Africa like a wildfire.

Yep.
Look at African demographics. I have done posts.

Remember: London’s Jews imported them by choice.

https://search.proquest.com/openview/0687ad9f04772d67e6df48de2195ff9c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=45619

The most important independent predictors of adolescent aggression were
troublesome and aggressive (difficult to discipline) behavior and lowintelligence
and attainment at ages 8-10.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5170-2_10

Aggression and Its Correlates over 22 Years

It is apparent from the varied substance of the chapters in this book that aggression is an overdetermined behavior. There are genetic, constitutional, and environmental factors as well as individual learning history and specific situational events which go into determining whether a person will act in an aggressive manner at any specific time. However, the large number of possible determinants does not mean that aggressive behavior cannot be predicted or explained. Research that my colleagues and I have been doing indicates, in fact, that aggressive behavior is consistent over time and across situations despite the fact that a number of factors contribute to the behavior in varying degrees.

intellectual ability was negatively related to aggressive behavior both contemporaneously and over time, and that intellectual competence itself showed a remarkable constancy over time and across measures.

Did I mention there’s a pirate bay for academic papers?

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-15097-001

There’s no hope for them, they cannot be taught.

In a 22-year study, data were collected on aggressiveness and intellectual functioning in more than 600 subjects, their parents, and their children. Both aggression and intellectual functioning are reasonably stable in a subject’s lifetime and perpetuate themselves across generations and within marriage pairs. Aggression in childhood was shown to interfere with the development of intellectual functioning and to be predictive of poorer intellectual achievement as an adult. Early IQ was related to early subject aggression but did not predict changes in aggression after age 8.

Eight, they’re set at eight.

Differences between early IQ and intellectual achievement in middle adulthood were predictable from early aggressive behavior. A dual-process model was offered to explain the relation between intellectual functioning and aggressive behavior. We hypothesized that low intelligence makes the learning of aggressive responses more likely at an early age, and this aggressive behavior makes continued intellectual development more difficult.

Incentives, as in behaviorism, do not operate in the low IQ as in the average. They are designed for regular intellects.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/developmental-medicine-and-child-neurology/article/behavior-and-mental-health-problems-in-children-with-epilepsy-and-low-iq/8F61E81D9364DE7757B91E549420F220

Low IQ here, 56-84. Middle 85-100, we used to call those morons. High 101-130.
If you read the full study, that’s an interesting cutoff. 85 as middle? It’s over 1SD.

Results indicated that children in the Low IQ group had the most behavioral and mental health problems. 

http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/193/3/185

IQ and non-clinical psychotic symptoms in 12-year-olds: results from the ALSPAC birth cohort

 There is a well-established association between pre-morbid low IQ score and schizophrenia. Psychosis-like symptoms in children may also be a risk factor for psychotic disorder but their relationship with IQ is unclear.

Over 6000 children

IQ was assessed at 8 years of age using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd UK edition).

After adjustment for confounding variables, there was a non-linear association between IQ score and psychosis-like symptoms, such that only those with below average IQ score had an increased risk of reporting such symptoms.

High IQ aren’t crazy, only the low.

 An association between low IQ score and the later development of schizophrenia has been established for many years.1116 The risk of schizophrenia increases gradually as IQ score falls, so that individuals with an average IQ score have an increased risk compared with those with the highest IQ scores.13,14,17

Knowing the Left, they’d brag about this for money.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-39082595

https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/types-of-mental-health-problems/schizophrenia/

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/07/the-enigma-of-urban-psychosis/491141/

“The Mystery of Urban Psychosis

Why are paranoia and schizophrenia more common in cities?”

Drugs can trigger it.

https://www.salon.com/2017/11/02/adolescent-pot-smoking-and-psychosis-link-strengthens_partner/

 At the World Psychiatric Association’s World Congress in Berlin on October 9, Hannelore Ehrenreich of the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine presented results of a study of 1,200 people with schizophrenia. The investigation analyzed a wide range of genetic and environmental risk factors for developing the debilitating mental illness. The results — being submitted for publication — show people who had consumed cannabis before age 18 developed schizophrenia approximately 10 years earlier than others. The higher the frequency of use, the data indicated, the earlier the age of schizophrenia onset. In her study neither alcohol use nor genetics predicted an earlier time of inception, but pot did. “Cannabis use during puberty is a major risk factor for schizophrenia,” Ehrenreich says.

Mystery.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/city-teenagers-psychosis-mental-health-country-adolescents-40-per-cent-study-schizophrenia-bulletin-a7750151.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2418996/

The largest study to date has demonstrated a ninefold higher risk of schizophrenia in UK-resident black Caribbeans:

Mystery.

http://www.bmj.com/content/323/7325/1336.short

http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7374/1212.short

The strongest evidence that cannabis use may be a risk factor for later psychosis comes from a Swedish cohort study which found that heavy cannabis use at age 18 increased the risk of later schizophrenia sixfold. 12 This study could not establish whether adolescent cannabis use was a consequence of pre-existing psychotic symptoms rather than a cause. We present the first prospective longitudinal study of adolescent cannabis use as a risk factor for adult schizophreniform disorder, taking into account childhood psychotic symptoms3 antedating cannabis use

http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000120

They won’t be violent, the money-grubbers say.

Schizophrenia and other psychoses are associated with violence and violent offending, particularly homicide. However, most of the excess risk appears to be mediated by substance abuse comorbidity. The risk in these patients with comorbidity is similar to that for substance abuse without psychosis. Public health strategies for violence reduction could consider focusing on the primary and secondary prevention of substance abuse.

Now for genetics.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941049

 the MAOA-uVNTR significantly predicted FSIQ, PIQ and verbal IQ (VIQ) (P = 0.009, 0.019, 0.038);

MAOA is the rage gene. Asian boys, IQ and MAO link, but ADHD confound.

https://selfhacked.com/blog/about-mao-a-and-what-to-do-if-you-have-the-warrior-gene/#Effects_ofLow_MAO-A_Levels

People with the low-activity MAO-A gene (2R, 3R) are overall more prone to violence.

Specifically, when these people feel very provoked or socially isolated their aggression will come out.

People with low MAO-A are more likely to be risk takers.  They are also more likely to take revenge and use greater force if they get screwed over, but not for small screw overs.

Mice with low MAO-A are also more aggressive in general and are more likely to start turf wars.

People and mice with low MAO-A are more impulsive and aggressive.

So the retarded form is bad, the slow kind.

https://thebiologist.rsb.org.uk/biologist-features/158-biologist/features/903-crime-genes

 The MAOA gene is X-linked, and these men and others in successive generations all exhibited problem behaviour including impulsive aggression, arson and rape.

Best preserved by incest marriage, then it’s definitely passed on via the women.

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/maoa-race-and-crime/

If only someone studied MAOA in Pakistan, place of highest incest marriage from Islam.

http://www.jpma.org.pk/full_article_text.php?article_id=7424

Oh wait.

They did.

 The variance was significantly different only for the anger sub-scale (p<0.05).

Does nobody just check anymore?

The X chromosomal location of the MAOA gene allowed us to determine the haplotype in these male individuals without imputation.

Aggression is a complex personality trait that is likely to be associated with the action of several genes involved in brain function.3 This is the first study investigating an association between scores on the self-reporting Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and the candidate gene, MAOA, in male subjects from Pakistan.

Self-report?

In the absence of whole genome sequences from South Asia…

Why is this study so shit?

Questionnaire in this population is an intriguing observation and requires replication in other population groups. It suggests that some humans may have been evolutionarily conditioned to curb their aggressive tendencies, thus enabling them to form social groupings. Such studies will help to unravel the role of candidate genes, epigenetics, gene-environment and gene-gene interactions in the development of aggressive human behaviour.29 Genome-wide association studies or whole genome sequencing of several thousand selected individuals with carefully defined behavioural phenotypes may offer several additional candidates for replication studies and functional analyses.
Our study was under-powered due to limitations in sample size and due to the fact that some samples had to be dropped because they could not be genotyped due to limited amount or poor quality of the DNA available.

Well they tried.

A better write-up.

Click to access 998s-2.pdf

There is strong evidence that genes play a significant role in antisocial behavior and
aggression (Raine, 2002). A bulk of twin and adoption studies provides clear evidence
that about 50% of the variance in antisocial behavior is attributable to genetic influences
(Moffit, 2005).

MAO –

Additionally it is involved in the metabolism of many
neurochemicals such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin and dopamine, already
linked to antisocial and aggressive behavior (de Almeida et al. 2005).

Most of the common DNA variants associated with complex traits and diseases have
been studied in populations of European origin, and the possibility of altered behavior
due to different gene-gene and gene- environment interactions in the non-European
populations has remained unexplored (Yngvadottir et al, 2009).

Coincidence.

The present study is the first attempt to explore DNA variations associated with aggressive behavior in an Asian population.

The first definitive evidence of MAOA gene involvement with aggression was
reported in a large Dutch kindred with a new form of X-linked, nondysmorphic, mild
mental retardation described as Brunner Syndrome (Brunner et al. 1993). The affected
males of this family showed abnormal behavior such as aggression, arson, attempted rape
and exhibitionism.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24326626

http://theunsilencedscience.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/scientists-rediscover-violence-gene.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105117/

 In order to account for any potential issues arising from the ethnic stratification of the sample, the analyses were then repeated omitting the 47 cohort members of Maori, Pacific Island and Asian ethnicity.

Coincidence.

Why are you studying Whites instead of Asians, we’ve done this. Decades now.

Grounds for Difference by Rogers Brubaker.

Collectivism, my old friend…

Click to access nsq059.pdf

Is there a genetic contribution to cultural
differences? Collectivism, individualism and
genetic markers of social sensitivity

Monoamine oxidase A and social rejection

That’s the section they can justify politically how the crimes of non-whitey are all the fault of whitey.

this polymorphism influencing sensitivity to social input in general

Are Muslims outraged by everything? Impossible, I know.

Particularly for the sensitivity alleles of the
A118G and MAOA polymorphisms, it appears that the experience
of being excluded from the social interactions of
others can be particularly aversive

Given that there is a higher prevalence of these putative
social sensitivity alleles in East Asian populations than in
Caucasian populations, there may be a relationship between
the relative proportion of these alleles and the predominant
cultural forms in a population. In collectivistic cultures, relationships
are enduring due to social ties that are reified by
mutual obligations between members of the family, clan, or
religion. These relationships are so salient that the self is
defined by them. Thus, the implicit construction of the self
in members of these cultures is inherently relational (Fiske
et al., 1998)

So casual.

I think you can begin to see why there isn’t much research on this topic.

It would be expensive and embarrassing when trade deals are on the table.

Eye colour genetics

It is completely unique, like a fingerprint but there are genetic markers that sway it broadly.

Dominance is the real theory, recession is just an absence of dominance. Recessive genes are more evolutionally novel, that’s why they’re quite easy to steamroll.

This is a simplified graph but instructive.

You could associate probabilities based on the parent’s DNA, their genotype, not phenotype outcome.