Why Midazolam?

Midazolam is given to people in NHS hospitals, it suppresses respiratory function. This is genocide. They also gave them morphine and put them on a death pathway, no food or water. They’re giving huge doses to people and it isn’t supposed to be used in over 60s.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/13/stay-at-home-protect-the-nhs-give-midazolam-to-the-elderly-and-tell-you-they-are-covid-deaths/

… Midazolam is also a drug that has been used in executions by lethal injection in the USA, combined with two other drugs. Midazolam acts as a sedative to make the prisoner unconscious. The other drugs then stop the lungs and heart working. However it has been the source of controversy as several prisoners took a long while to die and appeared to be in pain when midazolam was used.

Midazolam can also cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing that may lead to permanent brain injury or death.

….

Midazolam is also used before medical procedures and surgery to cause drowsiness, relieve anxiety, and prevent any memory of the event. It is also sometimes given as part of the anesthesia during surgery to produce a loss of consciousness.

Proof we bought it

A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare, one of five manufacturers of the drug, told The Pharmaceutical Journal that it had to gain regulatory approval to sell French-labelled supplies of midazolam injection to the NHS, after having already sold two years’ worth of stock to UK wholesalers “at the request of the NHS” in March 2020.

A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare told The Pharmaceutical Journal on 11 May 2020 that it was out of stock of midazolam injection after the NHS requested it “place all of its stock of midazolam — equivalent to around two year’s forecasted supply — into its wholesale partners”, even though the manufacturer “does not currently have any NHS contracts in England” to supply the drug.

MEANWHILE

https://www.livescience.com/51384-execution-drug-midazolam-effect.html

How Does Execution Drug Midazolam Work?

“States can still use the sedative drug midazolam in lethal injections, according to today’s Supreme Court decision. But how exactly does the drug work, and why do some say that it’s unreliable?

In a 5-to-4 vote, the court ruled that using midazolam does not violate the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” In executions, the drug has been used to induce unconsciousness before other drugs are administered to stop an inmate’s breathing and stop the heart.

However, midazolam was involved in several botched executions last year, including the case of Clayton Lockett from Oklahoma, who lived for about 45 minutes after he was administered drugs for lethal injection, and was seen convulsing and writhing before dying of a heart attack. (It was later determined that the IV line used to deliver the drugs in Lockett’s execution was not properly placed.)”

So the NHS combines it with morphine.

“The defendants who brought the case before the Supreme Court, who are all death row inmates, had argued that midazolam could not reliably induce unconsciousness. The drug is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an anesthetic by itself. [Mistaken Identity? 10 Contested Death Penalty Cases]”

Try adding morphine?

“According to Lubarsky, midazolam produces a sedative effect because it facilitates the binding of a brain chemical called GABA to brain receptors, which hinders the flow of electrical impulses in the brain. However, other drugs historically used in lethal injections, like sodium thiopental, have a greater effect on the brain because they can also mimic GABA’s effects. Midazolam does not, Lubarsky said.”

“This means that the effect of midazolam “is capped at a lower level of sedation,” wrote the justices who dissented with the decision. Lubarsky cited scientific studies and textbooks to back up his arguments, according to the Court’s dissent, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.”

Better stop water, that kills within three days.

“Another expert who testified in the case disagreed, saying that the dose of midazolam that will now be used in Oklahoma, 500 milligrams, would keep a person unconscious throughout an execution, because a very high dose of the drug would effectively paralyze the brain.”

“In the decision made today, five justices on the court sided with Evans, agreeing that a 500milligram dose of the drug would work. But the other four justices disagreed, writing in their dissent: “In reaching this conclusion, the Court sweeps aside substantial evidence showing that, while midazolam may be able to induce unconsciousness, it cannot be utilized to maintain unconsciousness in the face of agonizing stimuli.””

https://www.newsweek.com/what-midazolam-lethal-injection-drug-supreme-court-defended-use-348175

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/cd49a818-5645-4a94-832e-d22860804779

The drug midazolam – a sedative used by several states to cause unconsciousness – has proved so controversial that, in 2017, Alabama inmate Thomas D Arthur asked to be executed by firing squad. Arthur lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court to postpone his execution on the basis that midazolam, one of the drugs in Alabama’s three-drug lethal injection combination, could contribute to ‘prolonged torture’. The Supreme Court denied the appeal, and Arthur was executed (by lethal injection) in May 2017.

The controversy around midazolam became particularly heated at the time of Arkansas’s ‘mass executions’ in April 2017. The state’s plan to execute eight men in 11 days ultimately became the subject of the BBC Three documentary series Life and Death Row: The Mass Execution

Each of these is delivered at a dose that could theoretically kill the inmate; however, each drug has drawbacks. A cocktail of all three is used to mitigate the other drugs’ disadvantages.

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine. At low doses it has an anti-anxiety effect. At around 10mg, it knocks the inmate unconscious. On death row in Arkansas, the dose is 500mg.

What doses did the NHS buy? Four of them was it?

During the 2014 execution of Dennis McGuire in Ohio, which used a combination of 10mg midazolam and 40mg hydromorphone, McGuire was seen ‘gasping‘ for air for 10 to 13 minutes of the 24-minute execution. There were reportedly similar scenes during the execution of Joseph Wood in Arizona.

Separately, in a 2015 legal challenge brought by several death row inmates in Oklahoma, numerous experts testified that midazolam has no pain-relieving properties, and does not produce the deep, coma-like state of unconsciousness necessary to relieve suffering.

To stop the heart, potassium chloride is administered directly after the vecuronium bromide. Without proper sedation, this stage would be extremely painful. The feeling has been likened to ‘liquid fire’ entering veins and snaking towards the heart.

If the procedure goes according to plan, the inmate should be dead less than 10 minutes after the first drug enters their system.

From The BBC

https://www.drugs.com/mtm/midazolam.html

Midazolam can slow or stop your breathing, especially if you have recently used an opioid medication. Midazolam is given in a hospital, dentist office, or other clinic setting where your vital signs can be watched closely.”

https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/midazolam.html

MHRA/CHM advice: Benzodiazepines and opioids: reminder of risk of potentially fatal respiratory depression (March 2020)

“The MHRA reminds healthcare professionals that benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-like drugs co-prescribed with opioids can produce additive CNS depressant effects, thereby increasing the risk of sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Healthcare professionals are advised to only co-prescribe if there is no alternative and, if necessary, the lowest possible doses should be given for the shortest duration. Patients should be closely monitored for signs of respiratory depression at initiation of treatment and when there is any change in prescribing, such as dose adjustments or new interactions. If methadone is co-prescribed with a benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-like drug, the respiratory depressant effect of methadone may be delayed; patients should be monitored for at least 2 weeks after initiation or changes in prescribing. Patients should be informed of the signs and symptoms of respiratory depression and sedation, and advised to seek urgent medical attention should these occur.”

Higher doses are associated with prolonged sedation and risk of hypoventilation. The co-administration of midazolam with other sedative, hypnotic, or CNS-depressant drugs results in increased sedation. Midazolam accumulates in adipose tissue, which can significantly prolong sedation, especially in patients with obesity, hepatic impairment or renal impairment.

May cause drowsiness, impair judgement and increase reaction time, and so affect ability to drive or perform skilled tasks; effects of alcohol increased. Moreover the hangover effects of a night dose may impair performance on the following day.

AGAIN:

The above exchange took place in a parliamentary committee meeting on the 17th April 2020 between Matt Hancock and Dr Evans, who is a fellow Conservative MP.

AFTER THE FATAL MARCH ADVICE GIVEN ABOVE.

They knew, the monsters knew.

The sperm allergy vaccine and genocide by sterilisation

Missed this nugget.

https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC4345757

Provoking an allergic reaction to…. one’s own sperm?

Why do under-30s “need” anything, let alone a random new ‘vaccine’ with no ingredients list available?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/

1995 evidence of precedent for deceptive vector of transmission, official contamination reportage and hence, UN contravention of genocide law established in the 1940s, section (d) and (c):

“PIP: A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations. The natural hormone hCG is needed to maintain pregnancy. The hormone would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy. In the fall of 1994, the Pro Life Committee of Mexico was suspicious of the protocols for the tetanus toxoid campaign because they excluded all males and children and called for multiple injections of the vaccine in only women of reproductive age. Yet, one injection provides protection for at least 10 years. The Committee had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed for hCG. It informed HLI about the tetanus toxoid vaccine. HLI then told its World Council members and HLI affiliates in more than 60 countries. Similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities. The priest objects that, if indeed the purpose of the mass vaccinations is to prevent pregnancies, women are uninformed, unsuspecting, and unconsenting victims.”

UNCONSENTING VICTIMS

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/

“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future. Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimentation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.”

Control, like farm animals. Single injection for castration of male animals possible.

Look forward to the “drop of testosterone levels”. At least you got to drink some bitch tits beer with the ‘boys’. Don’t come crying to me. You wanted to be ‘male animals’.

Bad choice, adoptive parents are abusive

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

  1. Killing members of the group;
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
  4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
  5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

They know their own, in all cases of adoption, suspect pedo.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/26/republicans-erupt-over-digs-left-amy-coney-barrett/

now Democratic activists are raising alarm about U.S. District Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s adoption of two children from Haiti.

Nowhere in the Bible does it support adoption of non-genetic children, it’s legalised child-snatching. The Bible says go forth and multiply if you want more kids. The CHINOs are an embarrassment.

Adoption of non-kin children is Satanic. It destroys the child’s legal right to their own heritage, culture and family. Celebrities could sponsor the child at home with the extended family but it’s all about pride. Looking at the child outcomes, like IQ and personality and such are even inherited from the real genetic parents. If you’re not blood, you are not their parent. Stop virtue signalling, children aren’t objects to be passed around like Pokemon cards to whoever has the most money.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-changing-face-of-adoption-in-the-united-states

The proportion of adopted kindergartners being raised by a mother of a different race or ethnic group rose by 50% between 1999 and 2011. The proportion of adoptees with Asian backgrounds nearly tripled over the same time period. Paradoxically, the fraction of adopted students who are African-American seems to have fallen. What has not changed is that a large majority of adoptive parents are white, older, well-educated, and relatively affluent.

I don’t think abuse of kids is justified if they’re another race, either. We must hold Christians to the correct standards. The Biblical one of if you want kids, make them.

It’s imperialistic. They treat the kid like a handbag, it’s sick.

How dare they call this Christian?

https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-paradox-of-adoption/

Their parents are generally well-educated and affluent. They receive more time and educational resources from those parents than the average child gets from theirs. Yet they get into more conflicts with their classmates at school, display relative little interest and enthusiasm about learning tasks, and register only middling academic performance. About whom are we talking? Adopted children. This is the paradox of adoption in America.

This is the first study of adopted children’s school behavior that is based on independent teacher reports and makes use of a representative national sample of students from adoptive families.

Yet my analysis shows that adoptees do not do as well in school as one would expect from their highly advantaged home environments. The results call into question the widely held assumption that larger investments of money and time in children can overcome the effects of early stress and deprivation and genetic risk factors.

DUH.

Bad blood will out.

And the model minority thing is also propaganda, look at adolescent drinking/drug use/sexual promiscuity studies. There is no model minority, it’s just propaganda by the Boomers shaming the non-white kid into behaving. As you can see, when they’re not rigging the data by self-report, it doesn’t actually work.

Jayman used to blog about the non-existent parenting effect, even when they’re biologically yours.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403216/

At best they claim 2-5 IQ point different with within-race adoption white to white, which isn’t significant. It’s never the upper number.

Our analysis showed that, among the biological parents, each additional unit on the parental education scale was associated with 2.7 IQ points in the child, whereas among the adoptive parents, each additional unit of education was associated with 1.7 IQ points.

Can we stop coddling their ego please? I don’t care about adult feefees and ego over any child.

The residual difference between the IQs of the two groups of children was reduced from 4.4 to 3.4 when the difference between the biological and rearing parents’ education was included in the model.

https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/more-behavioral-genetic-facts/

Shared environment accounts for 0% of life outcome.

The high early shared environment influence shows that in youth, environmental factors can make a difference. These influences diminish and disappear with time, dashing hopes of lasting parental influence. Some voices – including preeminent behavioral geneticist Robert Plomin himself – often try to claim that the increasing heritability of IQ and other behavioral traits can be boiled down to “gene-environment correlations” (rGE). The idea being that people seek out environments to suit their genetic proclivities (which they do), and the influence of that environment leads to the final trait. This is a nice rosy idea, because it appears to leave the door open to environmental manipulation, if we could intervene in the “proper” ways. However, it is fantasy. We clearly saw in my earlier post that the “gene-environment co-variance” was often negative! One’s environment seemed to be “making” one the opposite of what one would expect. Our experiences don’t shape our political attitudes like we think they do. So is the case with IQ.

Indeed, a meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies attempted to test this idea. It sought to determine whether the increasing heritability of IQ could be explained by on-going environmental influence or genetic “amplification”; that is, the compounding of genetic effects over time. This is likely because the effect of each additional gene becomes more and more relevant as children grow up. Indeed, amplification is what they found:

Amplification IQ

Proponents of the efficacy of nurture – especially parenting – often repeat a few erroneous arguments. Here I will address them. One of them is the idea that parenting, while ineffective for most, may make a difference for individuals with certain temperaments. For example, perhaps the low IQ/shiftless/delinquent/criminal or otherwise poorly dispositioned might benefit from more authoritative parenting, say. It’s a nice idea to think about, but it doesn’t happen. This is essentially “Stolen Generations” wisdom. As we’ve seen in my earlier post, a massive review of twin and adoption studies found no significant shared environment effect on criminality in adults (well, modeling found a shared environment contribution of 0.09, which can generally regard to be non-significant given the enormous measurement error expected). Even an effect that operated on some children but not others would contribute to the overall average shared environment, which was negligible.

Edit, 6/5/14: [I wanted to expand on the above mentioned review of criminality (by Rhee & Waldman, R&W), particularly the appearance of a small but nonzero (though non-significant) shared environment finding. As we saw, the age the subjects are assessed seems to make a difference. As well, as discussed in my analysis on adolescent psychopathology below, the particular measure used – such who is doing the ratings – affect the values found. For example, self-ratings or ratings by parents tend to attenuate the heritability estimate, and both appear to inflate the shared environment estimate, at least in youth. The Rhee & Waldman meta-analysis is no exception. Here are the ADCE (A, or a2 = additive genetic variance; D, or d2 = non-additive genetic variance; C, or c2 = shared environment; E, or e2 = remaining variance) components as computed based on information given by different raters:

Rating method a2 d2 c2 e2 Total no. of pairs in category
Self-report 0.39 0.06 0.55 13,329
Other report (usually parents) 0.53 0.22 0.25 6,851
Criminal records 0.33 0.42 0.25 34,122

The total, or broad-sense heritability, H, is the sum of the additive (the narrow-sense heritability) and the non-additive genetic components. As we can see, when actual criminal records (a semi-objective metric) are used, as we’ve seen, the heritability shoots up to the usual range, at 0.75, and the shared environment estimate vanishes. The criminal record analysis also captures the largest number of subjects, bolstering its reliability. Parent reports, as seen below, inflate the shared environment measure. The self-report gives a negligible shared environment estimate, but reports a lower heritability estimate – which is not surprising, given that we can expect self-reported criminal behavior to be poorly reliable. It is unfortunate that R&W don’t separate out parents from peers and other non-relative raters in “other report.” Additionally, the adoption studies found a negligible shared environment impact of 0.05 between adoptive parents and adoptees. It is also too bad that R&W don’t cross tabulate the results by rating and age. But, as discussed below, adolescent shared environment effects maybe an artifact of unreliable raters anyway.

(For the record, the countries spanned by the studies in the meta-analysis include the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, Denmark, and Sweden.)

The bottom line, it’s clear that when it comes to anti-social behavior, the 75-0-25 rule holds perfectly firm. Parents and parenting do nothing to create upstanding citizens, and heredity is considerably important. ***End Edit***]

But the eugenicists were wrong about everything, ignore the historic era of prosperity exactly one generation after their American sterilizations in the 20s… which they predicted.

Indeed, also supporting this is another massive meta-analysis of behavioral genetic influences on adolescent psychopathology (personality disorders). These captures various types of child misbehavior and dysfunction, including convenient diagnoses such as “oppositional-defiant disorder.” A look and the breakdown of their results is far more interesting than their main reported results. Typically, shared environment effects are seen in children (<18 years old). The main study reported this, but fortunately, they decomposed the type of measurements used. In addition to self-report and parental report, they also had teacher report, peer reports, and clinical diagnoses. The self and parental reports showed lower heritabilities (0.3-0.5) and significant (though small) shared environment components. However, when teacher or peer reports were used, they found much higher heritabilities, in the 0.65-0.8 range. As well, the shared environment impact vanished. Using clinical diagnosis also produced a zero shared environment impact. Considering the sheer size of this review, it’s clear that parental behavior dosen’t contribute to this malaise, even at these ages.

Adoptive parents can lie? Why do that?

[ego]

The problem of somewhat unreliable measurements (noise), especially coming from self-report, was illustrated in my earlier posts. Averaged peer ratings serve to adjust for this problem to an extent both by providing more proper social context by which to make accurate comparative ratings and by cancelling out fluke readings. Indeed, one behavioral genetic study, which attempted to investigate the idea of a “general factor of personality” (GFP), akin to g for cognitive ability, found that when using the combined scores of self and peer ratings, the heritabilities of the Big Five personality traits shot through the roof, with the additive heritable component being:

  • Extraversion:           0.86
  • Openness:              0.92
  • Neuroticism:            0.59
  • Agreeableness:       0.85
  • Conscientiousness: 0.81

This demonstrates that more accurate measurements consistently push up the heritability estimate (even pushing them towards 100%), giving us the basis of the 75-0-25 or something rule.

As for the sixth dimension of personality, “honesty-humility”, the H component of the six factor HEXACO, evidence of its high heritability is also established, as we saw previously. Indeed, a recent post by Peter Frost (Evo and Proud: Compliance with moral norms: a partly heritable trait?) discussed a twin study from Sweden that looked at various forms of dishonesty, such as fraudulently claiming sick benefits or evading taxes. And sure enough, these particular behaviors showed considerable heritability. There is a desperate need for cross cultural behavioral genetic analyses. Many dimensions of personality systems like the HEXACO (as imperfect as they are) are likely to systematically vary from culture to culture.

Adoption is dyscivic. It’s AA for bad parents.

The usefulness of behavioral genetics – indeed, the single most powerful and solid area of all social science – is highly evident. But behavioral genetic methods can be used to address several long-standing questions. Here we see it’s clear that parents don’t leave much of an impact on our behavioral traits. But what about people who aren’t parents? Here I will look at two sets of important people, spouses and peers.

It is no secret that spouses correlate on behavioral traits. This, assortative mating, is a powerful force, as we’ve seen previously. There are two aspects where spouses are highly correlated – the things you don’t talk about in a bar: politics and religion. Some have assumed that a good bit of this is because spouses grow more similar with time. But is this the case?

This is where the “extended twin” design comes in handy. One large study (N > 20,000) in particular looked at precisely that. By including twins, their spouses, and parents, etc, they were able to directly measure assortative mating. What did they find? Spouses were correlated for several traits. But the traits they were most correlated in were political orientation and religiosity. Social “homogamy” (having the same background as your spouse) couldn’t explain this, as the correlation between MZ twins and their co-twin’s spouse were consistently higher than that of DZ twins, and so on. As well, spouses weren’t influencing each other, as the correlation between spouses was not affected by length of the marriage (even when only couples married <2 years were examined).

The neocons marrying lefties are kidding themselves.

And leagues clearly exist, assortative mating is genetic.

The study was also able to lay to rest another persistent myth. We’ve heard that we choose spouses like our opposite sex parent (like our mothers for men and like our fathers for women). Anyone who’s remotely genetically informed should be able to see that this could just be due to choosing mates like ourselves. And so is the case. As the authors put it:

there was no evidence for the sexual imprinting hypothesis. Twins’ partners were not significantly more similar in any trait to the twin’s opposite-sex parent than to the twin’s same-sex parent or a DZ co-twin of either sex, nor was there even a trend in this direction

These results were also consistent with the Peter Hatemi et al extended twin study on political attitudes featured previously.

The similarity between spouses has nothing to do with mutual influence, but assortment. At least this bit is common sense. I suspect few long married individuals will believe that they changed their spouse.

On that note, a key theory put forward by the woman who first elucidated the non effect of parents, Judith Rich Harris, was that the unique environment “influence” might be boiled down to peer influence. Staffan did a nice recap of Harris’s theory (see The Nurture Enigma – How Does the Environment Influence Human Nature? | Staffan’s Personality Blog). We all have heard of peer pressure. And indeed, peers seem to be an important force when it comes to language and behaviors like smoking initiation. But do peers really have this great influence, as Harris posits? Well, as I posted over at the Lion of the Blogosphere:

Most research into peer effects is confounded by the same thing that standard parenting studies are: inability to control for the effect of heredity.

And:

A behavioral genetic study (on the Add Health data) that looked specifically at GPA and found that 72% of the similarity between U.S. high school students and their peers could be explained by genetic factors. In other words, school performance and the apparent peer “influence” is really just kids choosing to associate with kids of similar intelligence and motivation:

A behavior genetic analysis of the tendency for youth to associate according to GPA

Peers seem like a fine avenue to get excited about, because it seemed like a vehicle through which parents could assert some influence. But, when you really consider it, peers can’t really be all that important in the long run, because if there were systematic effects of peers on adult outcomes, it’d turn up in the shared environment, which it doesn’t. One could posit that the effect of peers is completely random, but if that were true (aside from the major violation of Occam’s Razor that presents), why worry about it?

The “75-0-25 or something” rule is robust and reliable. This instructs that should we find some major deviation from this, it can be taken to be a sign something is seriously amiss. We saw that with male homosexuality (see Greg Cochran’s “Gay Germ” Hypothesis – An Exercise in the Power of Germs). Now I will discuss two curious exceptions to this pattern.

One rather astonishing example was the heritability of social trust.behavioral genetic study out of the Netherlands found that the heritability of trust in others, as measured by:

The trust-in-others and trust-in-self scales were designed to include three items that were central in existing scales … thereby capturing items with positive valence (“I completely trust most other people”) and negative valence (“When push comes to shove, I do not trust most other people”), both of which explicitly used the word “trust”, and an item that captured the broad behavioral implication of the trust: the intention to accept vulnerability, as explicated in one of the most widely-accepted definitions of trust … (“I dare to put my fate in the hands of most other people”)

…found no significant heritable influence on these. The extent that people trusted, at least as captured by these measures, was virtually entirely a function of the unique environment.

homogeneous environment > high trust

not hard

This was a puzzling result. The clear pattern of the high heritability of all behavioral traits was established, as I’ve discussed. So how could a propensity to trust not also be influenced by genetic factors? One explanation touted around was that trust is contingent on experience; if we found people trustworthy, we would trust. If we didn’t, we would not. While that might sound convincing, the trouble is that the same could be said for many other behavioral traits. Is general trust less socially contingent than say bigoted feelings against some groups, like homophobia (which is at least 54% heritable)? That seems rather unreasonable.

One key question: how do they assess “trust”? Just how good was their measurement? Measurements in social science need to meet three basic criteria: they need to be reliable (that is multiple testing instances of the same individual should give roughly the same results), they need to be “valid” (that is, be predictive of some real-world outcome), and they should be heritable. This trust measure clearly fails on the third criterion. However, the study authors claim the test-retest correlation was good, so it is reliable. But what about the second? Does this trust measure actually predict anything?

To find out, I looked at a study that sought to answer that very question. This study, done in Germany, looked in detail at the reliability and the validity of their measurement of trust, a measurement very similar to the Dutch study. The noted a key point, one HBD Chick will appreciate. That is, trust is multi-faceted. There is trust in institutions, which is distinct from trust in known others, which is distinct from trust in strangers (I’d imagine HBD Chick would break it down one more, and separate “known others” into family and non-family). But more importantly, to question of validity, they assessed this by the correlation between trust in strangers and trusting behavior in the “dictator game.” They found a correlation, but only with trust in strangers.

But their correlation was very small (Spearman’s \rho = 0.17) – and this is with a game which itself has questionable relation to trust behavior in the real world. I suspect that their instrument is not predictive of any trusting behavior in the real world. It’s worth mentioning another (fairly small) study of the heritability of trust from Australia found a non-insignificant heritability, though a smallish one (0.14-0.31).

The situation with trust is unclear. But this brings me to another example of a feature for which the heritability estimate appears to be trivial. That is the female G-spot. A study on about 1,800 female twins from Britain found that the heritability of the reported presence of a G-spot wasn’t significant. The result was virtually entirely unshared environment. Debate has raged on as to whether or not the female G spot exists at all, but that is to be expected, since research into human sexual behavior is among the most difficult to conduct properly. But, the result from this study indicating that the G spot isn’t heritable is puzzling. If the G spot was a real anatomical feature, and one that wasn’t universal, then one would expect a rather significant heritable impact. The finding that it’s not heritable points to one of two conclusions. One, perhaps the G-spot is in fact universal, but only some women have “discovered” it. That seems rather implausible, given the rather significant variation in heritable morphological features of sex organs in women. The second possibility is that the G-spot in fact doesn’t exist at all, and women who claim to have one are mistaken. That seems more likely, but I wouldn’t want to completely dismiss the claims of women who state they have such a feature. The mystery remains.

The findings of behavioral genetics, particularly the highly significant impact of heredity and the absence of shared environment effects, in addition to the complete failure to find reliable environmental sources that contribute to the “unique environment” component of the variance, calls into question virtually every pet environmental theory that has been put forward. It guides one to be suspicious of most “environmental” explanations of behavior. Now, let me be clear, I am not saying that these environmental influences don’t exist. I am not saying that if they do exist, we won’t be able to ever find them. I am also not saying that development doesn’t require a complex interplay between genes and environment. Try going without food, water, air, or speaking to another person if you don’t believe me. I am also not saying that the secular changes in human traits that are brought about by gross environmental changes don’t happen. The increase in average height over the past century disproves that. But what I am saying is that you should be doubtful of most pet theories of how the environment influences us, especially those that promise we can control, or sometimes even predict it. For as we see, that’s far from an easy task.

They want to sterilise you (hCGβ)

It isn’t just Mark of the Beast, the Satanists want to sacrifice all your children, including potential. All count to Moloch.

The Mark is also a marker of infertility. Mark(er) of the Beast (whose sacrifice is what).

You know, owned infertility, like a pet. The Bible says never to get tattoos, and your duty on this earth is to be fruitful and make godly children. Scroll for just studies but context is important, I feel.

HCG-beta sterilises women (and children), what’s the bet it’ll be in one dose of one mandatory thingey, eventually?  As you’ll see, all it needs is one. It mimics fatal cancer, encouraging the body to shut down reproduction to struggle to fight it off. Maybe not the first dose officially to force you all, better space it out to avoid suspicion.
I wonder where they’ll put this, along with other sterilising agents? Mistakes were made, woops! You can’t sue!
Am I crazy now? I’m only covering HCG-beta today, 101 style. Do your own damn research and share share share the studies, 4chan, 8kun, the works.

Sterilization programme imminent like Bill and others did in Nigeria (and other places). Then again with HPV (which reduces fecundity, when checked with age-peers) as previously covered by me.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831725/

“The fear of vaccines: Fear that a vaccine used by the WHO to combat polio can cause sterility in both men and women, has spurred some Northern Nigerian states to block a crucial vaccination campaign that is aimed at eradicating the disease from West Africa. “

And you call Africa dumb? They’re not.
Herd immunity is a myth, also covered by me, even at 100% “coverage” (impossible) doesn’t work (unfalsifiable, fake science).
Remember, most spanish flu dead were vaccinated soldiers (and nurses), that’s why it got so many young people.
A pawpaw tested positive for this, FFS. A fruit and a goat!
They never say in ‘outbreaks’ of measles etc, how many who got sick ALREADY HAD the vaccine (most), they’ll deflect or try to hide that topic.

ONTO THE STUDIES:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/
“Efforts to produce a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) face several important challenges.”

A ‘vaccine’ to stop you from reproducing. Don’t believe me?

Journal of Reproductive Immunology:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037809004537
“Gonadotropin-releasing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin β based recombinant antibodies and vaccines”

Vaccines have been developed against both GnRH and hCG and these have undergone Phase I/II clinical trials documenting their safety, reversibility and efficacy. The heterospecies dimer hCG vaccine prevented pregnancy in women of proven fertility without impairment of ovulation or derangement of menstrual regularity and bleeding profiles.”

Jump through their evil hoops and they might let you be a free human again. Keep reproduction free! Also, end medical segregation. Slaves weren’t allowed to breed until their master said so.

Anti-fertility vaccines, you only naturally express it when you have ‘advanced’ cancer.

“Ectopic expression of hCG/hCGβ is observed in many advanced stage cancers of various origins.”

Mandatory? Medical Marxism argument: I can violate your body with bio-rape implants because it may possibly help me, theoretically – or some hypothetical person.

MEN AREN’T IN THE CLEAR.

“These reduce serum testosterone to castration levels causing atrophy of the prostate.”

CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

The prize is disappointment. No lollipop.
“Castration levels” you couldn’t make it up. Evil has a PhD.

Guessing atrophy is permanent? Sounds kinda permanent. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876172/
Linked to ‘adverse prognosis’ (death).

Expression of the free β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ) in malignant tumors is frequently associated with aggressive disease. The pretreatment serum concentration of hCGβ is an independent prognostic variable in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The three so-called type II genes (hCGβ 3/9, 5, and 8) have been shown to be up-regulated in relation to type I genes (hCGβ 6/7) in some malignant tumors.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167569986900290

“This vaccine consists of a synthetic peptide representing, the carboxy-terminal 37 amino acids of hCG beta subunit coupled to diphtheria toxoid. The immunogen is pre- pared by linking the peptide to the carrier using a bifunctional reagent (6-maleimido caproic acyl N- hydroxy saccinimide ester)is in a manner to achieve predictable…”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0264410X89900431

Search engine (DDG) description:

“The second candidate vaccine is oLH.hCG-TT/CHB: a-subunit of ovine LH associated with hCG, linked to carriers such as TT or cholera toxin chain B (CHB). The third vaccine preparation is a physical mixture of hCG and oLH, each linked to carriers. These vaccines have completed phase I clinical trials in five centres in India.”

1989 publication date.

1989

When you click:

Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future. Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.

This, in 1989. I didn’t exist then. Imagine what they have now.

Calling white people (or any) ‘females’ and ‘males’ is dehumanizing, especially intended to destroy you/r genetic lineage. Your God-given right. It just so happens black men recently popularised this use in rap, which isn’t controlled by a certain group with certain investments, is it? Phew.

They want you allergic to your own body. Autoimmune infertility, sterilization by antibody, it’s right there. CASTRATION, CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals”

It relates to cancer vaccines
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3172635/

Anti-fertility vaccine again
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0897.1981.tb00063.x

“Peptides representing the amino acid sequence of the carboxy‐terminal of the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) beta subunit were used in studies to determine whether an immunogen could be prepared that would be suitable for an HCG antifertility vaccine. Peptides of varying length were conjugated to several macro‐molecular carriers, in varying peptide‐carrier ratios…”

Chemical human neuter sounds so cruel.

They think they own you.

Target for cancer therapy, apparently? Nice excuse. Sounds so comfy, philanthropy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11500441_Tumor-associated_antigen_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_beta_contains_numerous_antigenic_determinants_recognized_by_in_vitro-induced_CD8_and_CD4_T_lymphocytes

WHO knows?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15504700_Functional_and_immunological_relevance_of_the_COOH-terminal_extension_of_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_b_Implications_for_the_WHO_birth_control_vaccine

“The World Health Organisation (WHO) Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines has selected the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a target molecule for a contraceptive vaccine.”

You didn’t wanna breed, right?
How much would you pay for an anti-anti-fertility vaccine?
Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines….. selected…. target… fucking Nazi ‘eugenics’ again.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7693535

Christians are up first.

They later changed the name for being too obvious on a scale of really fucking obvious to taking le piss. Henceforth, it has become really fucking obvious.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951

“Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo.”

So including chemical abortion, like the Pill.

18,years, as of writing, totally off the cuff.

BIRTH CONTROL VACCINES, THE PROGRESS CONTINUES:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12286012/

NO SHIT, THAT’S THE TITLE. They think they own you.

During 1986-1988, the WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction used the diphtheria toxoid as a carrier for a fragment of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) molecule (a conjugate immunogen) and an immunostimulant in a phase I clinical trial of this prototype antifertility vaccine in sterilized women. Between 1990 and 1991, it conducted teratology studies in rats and rabbits to determine whether the vaccine causes fetal abnormalities. The vaccine did not adversely affect either the animals or their fetuses. Clinical trials of the vaccine’s effectiveness (phase II trials) are scheduled for 1992. At least 2 injections several weeks apart, are needed to produce an anti-hCG immune response which is only effective for 3-6 months, however. So the same components of the original vaccine were placed in a polymer to deliver the vaccine slowly over a prolonged and predetermined time frame. WHO hoped that this advanced vaccine would raise effective immunity levels long enough to last for at least 1 year after 1 injection. WHO is conducting dose-response and toxicity studies of this prototype vaccine in rabbits and baboons to identify the optimal dose which would elicit an effective immunity level over a desired period of time and would be safe for testing in humans. WHO hopes to begin a phase I clinical trial with this advanced anti-hCG vaccine in late 1992. WHO anticipates that the preclinical and clinical trials will reveal a need for further modifications and improvements. WHO is supported multicenter research on antitrophoblast vaccines which target membrane cells of the preimplantation embryo since 1985. It uses monoclonal antibodies (MABs) and recombinant DNA technology to identify and isolate surface molecules. So far this research has tested 15,000 MABs but is centering on 9 MAbs. A study in baboons showed that 1 MAB reduced fertility, even though researchers could only use minute amounts of the protein in the injection.

Population control = PR for genocide. Go after the guidestones people and their love of carving stone.

PR is rebranded propaganda to the post-war period, rebranded deliberately by the likes of one Bernays. That is historical fact.

Immunogenicity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X96000461
“Vaccines based on hCG have been proposed as a means either to prevent metastatic cancr6 or to control fertility’. Approaches to development of such vaccines have been pursued usij either the complete beta sub unit of hCG (hCG-fl) or the 37 amino acid CTP alone”

Most people wouldn’t want an anti-cancer anything if it made them sterile.

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/6/1/166/875911

“The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities”

“As a result of this inter national, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

Guess the year. Guess. I’ll tell you in a few lines.*

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277953695000378
“Immunization to regulate fertility…”

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Beta-HCG
“produced by placental cells”

*It’s 1991 published above re WHO. 
PDF here: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.883.9964&rep=rep1&type=pdf

save save save

bookmark, usb, email, any way you can get this all out there

This one is tricksy.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0218-118?draft=marketing

“Even though the idea of a birth control vaccine was gaining traction

… WHO task force trial undertaken on women in Sweden testing the vaccine …”

described in SEO brief

paywalls should be illegal

maybe you can find this paper on the piratebay of academic papers

https://scihub.to/

No excuses. Weird they hide this recent one re Swedish info, because it’s ongoing?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/S0968-8080%2897%2990087-2

Published 1997.

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertifity vaccines

spellings are often deliberate to thwart SEO

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertility vaccines

corrected

This paper describes the controversy surrounding anti-fertility vaccines, focusing on the antihCG vaccine. It deals first with the rationale that researchers give for the development of antifertility vaccines, and the specific requirements that they set for the new contraceptive method.
Two distinct prototypes of anti-hCG vaccines are clearly emerging, one of which might be
characterised as maximising safety and the other as maximising efficacy. A vocal group of
women’s health advocates have opposed the development of both prototype vaccines, pointing to
theoretical health risks and the potential for abuse, and call for a stop to further research. This
paper shows how the scientists’ discourse on safety and acceptability of the technology to future
users has changed in response to the critique of women’s health advocates. Finally, it reflects on
the role of women’s health advocates in contraceptive technology development, and the
responses of researchers to their actions.

They took over womens’ groups to avoid discussion of important issues.

TLDR trust the “scientists” what human ‘error’? let alone ‘evil’ trust the ‘experts’

you know, pre-replication crisis

scientists often own stock so….. null appeal

2015
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/

The possibility of a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin has long been recognized, but never fully realized.

weird, previously they’ve claimed success in ‘trials’?

they think you’re stupid

you can’t ban something they claim doesn’t exist (yet)

Here we describe an epitope-specific approach based on immunogenic display of hCG-derived peptides on virus-like particles of RNA bacteriophage. A number of recombinant VLPs were constructed, each displaying a different hCG-derived peptide. Some were taken from the disordered C-terminal tail of the hormone, another came from an internal loop, and yet another was an epitope mimic produced by affinity-selection on an hCG-neutralizing antibody target. Immunization of mice with some VLPs yielded antisera that bound the hormone and neutralized hCG biological activity.”

neutralised, like a threat
neutered you – like a dog

share share share the studies, you don’t have to link to me just SHARE

I haven’t posted this previously to avoid it getting censored prematurely.
Is anyone else keeping a tally of how many times I can piss off the WHO or NWO people without being murdered? Just me?

Sargon: Christianphobia

Surely that’s Christophobia? It’s taken him long enough, hasn’t it? Everything he loves is CULTURALLY Christian – live and let live, free speech, right to a trial etc.

These libertarians might be atheist but they LIVE in a culturally Christian nation.

There’s no libertarian freedom without Christian turning of the cheek and leaving people to it.

Thessalonians tells you explicitly not to fund people who want to live off you instead of working.

https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm

This is why.

The ongoing Christian genocide, especially in MENA, is hardly a phobia.

It’s genocide. Christians of every colour, being punished for their religion.

You cannot “turn the other cheek” to people who wanna kill you.

To crazy people who want to bring about the Apocalypse by spilling the blood of innocents.

You kick them out, after stopping the funds to incentivise their breeding.

Child brides must be ruled null and void. Minors cannot consent to marry.

Circumcision must be banned as child mutilation, which it is. If the son wanted it, they’d get it aged 18.

Label ‘Halal’ and ‘Kosher’ by law so atheists can avoid the products. They either don’t stun or insufficiently stun the animals and thereby are already illegal under animal abuse laws.

Sharia courts are already treasonous as a parallel legal system, as are interest-free loans only available to Muslims (when Christians oppose usury too).

Vote rigging must be exposed. Getting imaginary relatives, dodgy postal votes and people who don’t speak English to ‘vote’ must be stopped. Intimidation, religious leaders telling people how to vote, must be punished.

Is Sargon doubting multiculturalism now?

Does he ‘believe’ in IQ now?

How about the child rape, cousin ‘marriage’ and child ‘brides’? Are they ‘free’ to do that in his libertarian lefty paradise?

How about IQ/aggression correlation? Any proof?

Don’t let up on reminding these people how naive they are, to assume the world is a 120IQ middle-class white male with no criminal or deviant tendencies. The world is not WEIRD.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/
This cannot continue, culturally or financially, so it won’t.
Hey, you wanted your “thought prison” and now you have blasphemy laws.

There are always witch trials with these sorts of things. Slowly, at first. The ‘sharia police’ going round London were never punished, which makes it legal. The Muslims have a special group for working in the police, that’s illegal – blending religion/state. Various ‘charities’ do illegal things, expose them.

I suggest you start by going after the academics who pushed for ‘phobia’ blasphemy laws as serious and violent.

Like feelings + Muslim = special privileges. Their ‘hate’ isn’t illegal, but taxpayer sponsored! Non-Muslims are second-class citizens, even the rich Jew who lost London mayor to anti-Semitic rigging. The Jews polluted their own narrative and replaced themselves. Labour is no longer a working-class party, another should be founded/allowed (we actually live under fascism+socialism) and the new Article 4 is essentially anti-democracy, it has no place in a party here. Tony Blair hasn’t been shot for war crimes and his treason changes somehow stand. For now.

If the academics responsible for this mess backtrack, it’ll affect legal proceedings and avoid disaster.

The other thing is tax the spices. Seriously. They hate the local food. The illegals would leave. Just do expensive ‘safety’ checks before letting it in the country because so much is adulterated and properly tax restaurants. Under ‘green’ principles, importing spices should accommodate the cost of oil in carrying it over, as a luxury good. Spices are actually medically bad for you so the NHS should be onboard unless it wants extra gastro patients on its books.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/11/09/the-myth-of-austerity-uk/

Video: Debt, usury and Trump

Name the beast, financial genocide.

C and D for debt and $200.

Occupy types and Fight Club lovers don’t understand the word usury is the old word for debt and should, hence, be laughed at.

Inflation isn’t normal, with increasing luxuries and supply, deflation should be the norm, currency mimicking surplus and prosperity. Then the banks would owe you money for loaning it to them, yes, ANY money placed in a bank is legally loaned for them to invest on your behalf, we are all investors without liberty. The most indebted people in the world run the banks and we must make them pay.

We are not in debt.

THEY ARE.

They took it into their system, promising interest (profit) and we want it AAAAAALLL back in one gigantic lump sum in a real, national currency that is valid (no usury). A bank by the People, for the People.

Their certificates of their indebtedness to the Western Peoples hold no value per se and should not be respected as “currency”. Faceless money-printers should be forced to stand on public trial, for warmongering and other crimes.

They don’t control the value of that currency because they don’t have a real job to produce value, the power is ours. The workers. Even Communists can get on board with this plan.

p.s. We’re all entitled to the option of Sharia-compliant (no interest) loans.

Did Christianity kill the Divine Feminine?

TLDR: Yes, and that’s why the Church is doomed unless it appeals to women, who’ve proven their value objectively since the Industrial Revolution.

all this nonsense about banning suffrage (would also apply to most men) is based on the idea that with sub-human rights, women would flock back to the church
may as well expect a turkey to roast itself and walk to your dinner table

“But I didn’t have a reference point for an empowered and liberated feminine. As Marion Woodman has said, “[T]he feminine is so difficult … to talk about … because so few people have experienced it.”

http://www.astro.com/astrology/tma_article150407_e.htm
this concerns me

it would be ironic if the whole Vatican were going to Hell as false prophets
they have denied many gospels for political reasons
even though I see the societal benefits of Patriarchy, all the forms that worked in the past acknowledged and appreciated femininity, because without tacit female approval, it was doomed to fail

without a positive role in society, why would half of society go along with it?
also the reason we are, generationally, rejecting feminism, which also casts us as prostitutes and fakers like the days of yore (use make-up to look like a totally different person! and impress men!)
it’s also a problem to assume with either sex that their only function IS sex, that’s the mark of liar

the whole thing savours of projection
history without stories of either sex is empty and a seed without soil is nothing
naturally a group of virgin men are going to say women are the devil because of temptation but only an idiot would believe them, it’s as silly as comparing all men to hercules, all the stuff about providence disappeared only to credit women with vanity, lust and dying in childbirth …I wonder why God sent all those plagues…. it’s almost like they spent centuries murdering innocent women as witches…

applause clap clapping yes well done

it’s the white genocide even supposed ‘red-pills’ never, ever talk about

“Perkins was told that one of the roles of women — their most important job, on which the survival of the tribe depends — is “telling men when it is time to stop … [M]en hunt animals and cut trees even when there is enough meat and wood, unless women rein them in.” 31 Perkins tells of a Shuar shaman coming to visit the United States, asking, “Where are your women? Why are they not telling the men to stop?””

“Barstow reports that, as a legacy of the witch hunts, European women became afraid to speak up, and protested less: “From having, at the end of the Middle Ages, a reputation for being scolds and shrews, bawdy and aggressive, women began to change into the passive, submissive type that symbolized them by the mid-nineteenth century.”

why aren’t stupid women involved in politics, they ask.
Well, the last time we tried, you burnt us at the stake for predicting the weather and bringing down your fever with tea.

well leaves nope no go leaving

the most probable theory of rationale is a cull of the high intelligent women without a filter
we don’t have many Hypatias, do we? and how many monk scholars are known versus nuns?

you know if there was a male genocide calling them all Satan, we’d still be hearing about it

the most persuasive evidence? aside from the papacy’s history of lies

“Researcher Derek Murphy explains: “In the mysteries of Ephesus, the Goddess wore this symbol [Vesica Pisces] over her genital region, and in the Osiris story, the lost penis was swallowed by a fish which represented the vulva of Isis. Likewise, in many examples of Christian art, Jesus Christ is proceeding from this symbol, representing his birth from the Goddess.”38 Murphy goes on to show how the Christian fish symbol actually comes from the Vesica Pisces — which you can see in the center shape, plus the lines of the tail.”

I’ve already pointed out that it’s insane to worship a virgin’s sexuality. It’s so Freud, have your cake/eat it, keep your ego/feed your ego, Mother/Whore that I won’t touch it with a bargepole.

The Anti-White Narrative

anti-whitenarrative

Genocide if it happens in Tibet, genocide in Europe too.

There’s evidence for a black genocide too, with taxpayer-funded abortion. However, that is slightly different to the white situation, since we don’t have a homeland like blacks have Africa and the Caribbean.

It’s an oppressive social construct that denies freedom of association and the racial right to one’s homeland and self-determination.

They try to deny this and the import of borders, but they still want to kick the whites out of Africa.

europe4europeans

The response?

pocahontas

It’s a special brand of retarded that quotes Disney lyrics about genocide and the right of conquest, to disprove genocide and invasion, called mass immigration.

If the white people shouldn’t be in America, and we came earlier, having the better claim, and made more of it (civilization) then black people have no excuse. It would be tempting to leave America to the so-called ‘Natives’ and see how many years until it becomes a dystopic Detroit without white patrons.

Can I just talk for a moment about the animism in that bloody song? Even philosophy thinks it’s retarded, since their question is non-life, but animism posits that everything is life- therefore, logically, nothing is alive. As in, if you bashed a human’s head in with a rock, it wouldn’t be murder, because there’s no such thing as non-life and a corpse is no different than the living being, oh, and the rock is alive too. The animism came, not from any wisdom, but because they did drugs, like their worthless descendants. It’s noble savage theory, truly, noble druggy in rags.