Globalisation tanked Western wages, birth rates

Duh? Nothing to do with women, who always worked. That was a false flag by Peterson, who curiously didn’t show any data (because that data does not exist). Women always worked, even in pre-industry, except the royalty and certain aristocrats. That is nowhere near most women, let alone all.
Contrary to Peterson’s nagging, Western incomes are still high internationally, so what would explain the 60s-00s replacement of the working class, but globalisation broadly and international competition from mass immigration locally? Naturally his lefty politics won’t allow him to finger the true culprit because that raises uncomfortable questions for his age group.

keep up the white guilt, clearly!
For example, how the World we bred will be fed as white people die out.

Missionaries violated the Bible by giving gibs to heathens, as in ‘those who will not work, shall not eat’.
https://www.worlddata.info/average-income.php
But y’know, that’s just actually looking for the DATA.

UK average income $42k.
Meanwhile places with an intact culture (relatively) and plausibly more K-family units (read: high marriage rates) have super low incomes and larger families as the norm still.
e.g.
Poland $15.2k
Croatia $14.9k
Russia $11.2k
Serbia $16.1k
Hungary $7k
since you all have such a hard-on for the EE nations

so it’s a blatant FALLACY to conflate income with family formation in white people

with ONGOING data to prove it decisively (no muh 21st century is different)

losers: “it’s all about the money! that’s why women don’t want me!” sure

and population has gone up steadily e.g. Russia.
https://www.worlddata.info/europe/russia/populationgrowth.php
The data is out there but the fake redpill refuse to admit immigration is the problem and always has been (because literally most of them are immigrants, Magic Dirt men playing hello fellow white man). They wish to foment mutual white hatred (r-select impulse, the spiteful mutant) and what are the two biggest demographics in any race? Men v. women. Men stop protecting the women, women are easy prey. Divide, conquer. Cowardly but dysgenic.

The rise of the East has killed the West and the traditional breeding stock of the working class.
Globalisation kills.
Blaming the in-group is what the Globalists want, it produces further sterility and prevents you from questioning them (political triangulation), see: SJWs salivating over causing a gender war and larping as white women when they aren’t (religiously).

Did women get the vote in 1995, ya morons?

FFS pay attention

example of this all with EE nations again:

this took me five minutes to research, what is Peterson’s excuse?

Poland has one of the lowest birth rates in the EU (as covered before, the r-women don’t want kids when asked)
but even their population has been holding steady despite emigration and low incomes
.
https://www.worlddata.info/europe/poland/populationgrowth.php
Blaming ‘women’ for working is plain ignorant of history! Did they think their grandmothers all twiddled their thumbs?
What would they prefer? Living on welfare? Starving? Working until their eggs are all gone? Those are the only options, all demographic death. Women cannot fix this and shouldn’t be blamed for it. At some point they need to man up and admit men need to correct the ‘mistakes’ of their forefathers i.e. globalisation, immigration, multiculturalism.

There was data going round, mentioned by Academic Agent, that if only women voted in the UK since WW2, no left wing government would’ve ever gotten into power since. I’d like a video on that. Shan’t hold my breath but if enough people pester him he could trigger some broflakes because the sloth of r-men votes socialism due to lower T, r-women want to work. Americans need to look at data before complaining. Why are no major MGTOW/MRA channels removed from youtube? The plan is anti-white family, duh.

Besides, adopting pure r, we physically could not outnumber them by over-breeding, they’re generations ahead of us. The baby cult cannot flatten r-numbers.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/continents-of-the-world-by-total-fertility-rates.html

“The global fertility rate fell from 5.25 children per woman in 1900, to 2.44 children per woman in 2018. The steepest drop in this shift happened in a single decade, from 1970 to 1980.”
When Boomers gave the Pill to unmarried couples
and factories moved overseas.

“The overall decline in fertility rates isn’t expected to end anytime soon, and it’s even expected to fall past 2.1 children per woman, which is known as the “replacement rate”. Any fertility below this rate signals fewer new babies than parents, leading to an eventual population decline.
Experts predict that world fertility will further drop from 2.5 to 1.9 children per woman by 2100. This means that global population growth will slow down or possibly even go negative.”
All socialist/Marx models rely on rising population, that’s why all their policies e.g. Sex Ed, single parent gibs, no criminal punishment for adultery, all have the same outcome. They’re breeding chattel for their pension pot.
Socialists oversee the breeding of their own slaves. Dark, huh?

As Darwin suggested, evolution is a race for life, and until the overseas threats are dealt with, local solutions are null and void. The ship is sinking, stop your enemies from blowing more holes in the boat. K-selection requires a fair i.e. closed system for operation. Globalists hate this because one such system would easily outcompete them. R-types pouring into the same territory exploiting shared resources will starve all Ks.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/third-world-countries

Going by the historical definition, nations such as Finland, Sweden, Ireland, and Switzerland were Third World countries. Based on today’s definition, these would not be considered Third World countries. Instead, what many now interpret “Third World” to mean encompasses economically poor and non-industrialized countries, as well as newly industrialized countries.

Peterson is a globalist liar.

Just read the basic DATA, enclosed:

https://oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/884/The_West_and_the_Rest_in_the_International_Economic_Order.html

Pasted for completion, ho ho ho.

The international economic order has changed in the last 40 years and will no doubt go on changing, as leading economist, Angus Maddison, explains.*

In 1962, we usually divided the world into three regions. The advanced capitalist group was then known as the developed world. The second was the “Sino-Soviet bloc”. Countries “in course of development” were the third world. The China-USSR split occurred in the early 1960s; most of the communist regimes collapsed around 1990, and the hostility of the cold war has largely faded away. The income gap between the former communist countries and the advanced capitalist group has become very much wider than it was. For this reason, a tripartite division of the world economy is no longer appropriate.

For rough comparisons, it is now useful to divide the world in two and compare developments in the advanced capitalist group with the aggregate for lower-income countries – designated as the “West” and the “Rest” in our tables. On average, the West increased its income per head fourfold from 1950 to 2001 – a growth rate of 2.8% a year. In the rest of the world there was a threefold increase – a growth rate of 2.2%. In both cases this was much better than earlier performance. From 1820 to 1950, income grew 1.3% a year in the West and 0.6% in the Rest. Though the gap in income level was still increasing, the acceleration in performance was bigger in the Rest.

Population of the West rose by half from 1950 to 2001 (0.8% a year), about the same pace as in 1820-1950. In the Rest, the situation was very different. Population grew by 2.0%, compared with 0.6% in the earlier period. This reflected a major improvement in welfare as mortality declined and life expectation rose from 44 to 65 years in 2001 – much faster than in the West. In the past two decades birth rates have fallen rapidly – a demographic transition which happened earlier in the West.

The West is now a relatively homogeneous group in terms of living standards, growth performance, economic institutions and modes of governance. Over the past five decades there has also been significant convergence in most of these respects. This is not true of the Rest. There are more than 180 countries in this group. They have nearly all increased their income levels significantly since 1950, but the degree of success has varied enormously. Most of Asia is experiencing fast per capita income growth. Most African countries are fairly stagnant. Most Latin American countries found it very difficult to keep a steady trajectory of advance in the 1980s and 1990s. Population growth is fastest in Africa, a good deal slower in Latin America and slower still in Asia. Life expectation and levels of education are lowest in Africa, better in Latin America, and better still in Asia.

Between 1950 and 2001, the Asian group increased per capita income fivefold and narrowed the relative gap between their incomes and the West. In other regions there was no convergence. Latin American income rose more than twofold, in the former command economies of Eastern Europe and the USSR less than twofold and in Africa about two thirds.

The divergence was even more striking in 1990-2001. In this period the Western group increased their income by a fifth, the Asian group by half, Latin America by a sixth, Africa stagnated and in the former communist countries per capita income fell by a quarter. [DS: WHYYYYYYY]

American policy since 1973 has been much more successful than that of Western Europe and Japan in realising potential for income growth. The incidence of unemployment is now about half of that in Western Europe, whereas in 1950–1973 it was usually double the European rate. Labour force participation increased, with employment expanding from 41% of the population in 1973 to 49% in 1998, compared with an average European rise from 42 to 44%. The percentage drop in working hours per person was half of that in Western Europe. These high levels of activity were achieved with a rate of inflation which was generally more modest than in Western Europe.

US policymakers have been less inhibited in operating at high levels of demand than their European counterparts. Having the world’s major reserve currency, and long used to freedom of international capital movements, they generally treated exchange rate fluctuations with benign neglect. The Reagan administration made major tax cuts, and carried out significant measures of deregulation in the expectation that they would provoke a positive supply response that would outweigh potential inflationary consequences. The US operated with more flexible labour markets. Its capital market was better equipped to supply venture funds to innovators. Its economy was as big as Western Europe but much more closely integrated. Demand buoyancy was sustained by a stock market boom in the 1990s.

The United States was a major gainer from the globalisation of international capital markets. In the postwar period until 1988, US foreign assets always exceeded liabilities, but thereafter its net foreign asset position moved from around zero to minus $1.5 trillion (more than 20% of GDP). Thus the rest of the world helped to sustain the long American boom and financed the large US payments deficit.

Future prospects

The table provides a quantification of growth performance of eight major regions of the world economy and some very tentative projections for development up to the year 2015.

The demographic projections are those of the United Nations Population Division, and indicate a continuing decline in the rate of population growth in virtually all parts of the world. Nevertheless there will still be a very striking difference between the advanced capitalist group and Africa. At 0.33% a year it would take 210 years to double population in the first group. In Africa it is likely to happen within 32 years. [forcing all white people to marry would not work]

In making per capita GDP projections, I assumed a continuance of 1990-2001 rates of performance in Western Europe and Japan and a mild slowdown in the USA, where the information technology bubble of the 1990s has burst, and where the capital inflow which financed its trade deficit seems likely to slacken substantially. Aggregate per capita growth in the “West” seems unlikely to slow down very significantly, but combined with the demographic slowdown, it means that aggregate GDP growth would be about 2% a year. This pace would be similar to that in 1913-1950. Growth momentum transmitted by the “West” is likely to be more modest than in 1870-1913 and 1973-2001.

Asia (excluding Japan)

The most buoyant part of the world economy since the early 1970s has been Asia (excluding Japan). These economies have grown faster than those of the West and their buoyancy has been sustained in great part by their own policies. Their weight in the world economy is much larger than any other non-Western region. I assumed that their per capita growth 2001-2015 will be at the same pace as in 1990-2001.

These economies are catching up with the West and are still at a level of development where “opportunities of backwardness” are unlikely to erode. The combination of high investment rates and rapid GDP growth means that their physical capital stock has been growing more rapidly than in other parts of the world. The East Asian economies also have a high ratio of employment to population. This is due to falling fertility and a rising share of population of working age, but also reflects the traditionally high labour mobilisation of multi-cropping rice economies. In all cases which are documented they had high rates of improvement in education and the quality of human capital. Equally striking were the rapid growth of exports, the high ratio of exports to GDP, and a willingness to attract foreign direct investment as a vehicle for assimilation of foreign technology. These characteristics of China, South Korea and Chinese-Taipei have made for super-growth, but there is a second tier of countries whose growth is accelerating rapidly. The most notable case is India which has the potential to join the super-growth club. There are other economies where prospects are more problematic, but these are only a sixth of the Asian total. The projections assume no substantial change in their performance.

Latin America

Latin America is the second largest non-Western region with about 8% of world product and a slightly bigger share of world population. Until the 1970s, economic policy was different from that in the advanced capitalist group. Most countries never seriously tried to observe the fixed rate discipline of Bretton Woods. National currencies were repeatedly devalued, IMF advocacy of fiscal and monetary rectitude was frequently rebuffed, high rates of inflation became endemic. Most countries reacted with insouciance to the worldwide explosion of prices, and governments felt that they could accommodate high rates of inflation. They were able to borrow on a large scale at negative real interest rates to cover external deficits incurred as a result of expansionary policies.

However, the basic parameters had changed by the early 1980s. By then, the OECD countries were pushing anti–inflationary policy very vigorously. The change to restrictive monetary policy initiated by the US Federal Reserve pushed up interest rates suddenly and sharply. Between 1973 and 1982, external debt increased sevenfold and the credit worthiness of Latin America as a whole was grievously damaged by Mexico’s debt delinquency in 1982. The flow of voluntary private lending stopped abruptly, and created a massive need for retrenchment in economies teetering on the edge of hyperinflation and fiscal crisis. In most countries resource allocation was distorted by subsidies, controls, widespread commitments to government enterprise and detailed interventionism. Most of them also had serious social tension, and several had unsavoury political regimes.

In the 1930s, most Latin American countries resorted to debt default, but it was not a very attractive option in the 1980s. World trade had not collapsed, international private lending continued on a large scale. The IMF and World Bank had substantial facilities to mitigate the situation, and leverage to pressure Western banks to make involuntary loans and legitimate a substantial degree of delinquency.

In the 1980s, the attempts to resolve these problems brought major changes in economic policy. But in most countries, changes were made reluctantly. After experiments with heterodox policy options in Argentina and Brazil, most countries eventually embraced the neoliberal policy mix pioneered by Chile. They moved towards greater openness to international markets, reduced government intervention, trade liberalisation, less distorted exchange rates, better fiscal equilibrium and establishment of more democratic political systems.

The cost of this transition was a decade of falling per capita income in the 1980s. After 1990, economic growth revived substantially but the process was interrupted by contagious episodes of capital flight.

My projections for Latin America assume some modest improvement in per capita performance in 2001-2015.

Africa

Africa has nearly 13% of world population, but only 3% of world GDP. It is the world’s poorest region. Its population is growing seven times as fast as in Western Europe. Per capita income in 2001 was below its 1980 peak. African economies are more volatile than most others because export earnings are concentrated on a few primary commodities, and extremes of weather (droughts and floods) are more severe and have a heavy impact.

As a result of rapid growth, little more than half the population is of working age. Almost half are illiterate. They have had a high incidence of infectious and parasitic disease (malaria, sleeping sickness, hookworm, river blindness, yellow fever). Over two thirds of HIV-infected people live in Africa. As a result the quantity and quality of labour input per head of population is much lower than in other parts of the world.

European powers became interested in grabbing Africa in the 1880s. Twenty-two countries eventually emerged from French colonisation, 21 from British, 5 from Portuguese, 3 from Belgian, 2 from Spanish. Germany lost its colonies after the First World War, Italy after the Second. The colonialists created boundaries to suit their own convenience, with little regard to local traditions or ethnicity. European law and property rights were introduced with little regard to traditional forms of land allocation. Hence European colonists often got the best land and most of the benefits from exploitation of mineral rights and plantation agriculture. African incomes were kept low by forced labour or apartheid practices. Little was done to build a transport infrastructure or to cater for popular education.

Colonisation ended between 1956 and 1974. In South Africa, the mass of the population did not get political rights until 1994. Independence brought many serious challenges. The political leadership had to try to create elements of national solidarity and stability more or less from scratch. The new national entities were in most cases a creation of colonial rule. There was great ethnic diversity with no tradition or indigenous institutions of nationhood. The linguistic vehicle of administration and education was generally French, English or Portuguese rather than the languages most used by the mass of the population. Africa became a focus of international rivalry during the cold war. China, the USSR, Cuba and East European countries supplied economic and military aid to new countries viewed as proxies in a worldwide conflict of interest. Western countries, Israel and Chinese-Taipei were more generous in supplying aid and less fastidious in its allocation than they might otherwise have been. As a result, Africa accumulated large external debts which had a meagre developmental pay-off.

There was a great scarcity of people with education or administrative experience. Suddenly these countries had to create a political elite, staff a national bureaucracy, establish a judiciary, create a police force and armed forces, send out dozens of diplomats. The first big wave of job opportunities strengthened the role of patronage and rent-seeking, and reduced the attractions of entrepreneurship. The existing stock of graduates was too thin to meet the demands and there was heavy dependence on foreign personnel.

The process of state creation involved armed struggle in many cases. Many countries have suffered from civil wars and bloody dictators. These wars were a major impediment to development.

In many African states, rulers have sought to keep their positions for life. In most states, rulers relied for support on a narrow group who shared the spoils of office. Corruption became widespread, property rights insecure, business decisions risky.

A major factor in the slowdown since 1980 has been external debt. As the cold war faded from the mid-1980s, foreign aid levelled off, and net lending to Africa fell. Although the flow of foreign direct investment has risen it has not offset the fall in other financial flows

The challenges to development in Africa are greater than in any other continent, the deficiencies in health, education and nutrition the most extreme. It is the continent with the greatest need for financial aid and technical assistance. The per capita GDP projections assume that these kinds of aid will be increased and that per capita growth will be positive. However, it is unlikely that African countries will, by 2015, be able to establish a trajectory of rapid catch-up such as Asian economies have achieved.

Eastern Europe

In Eastern Europe, the economic system was similar to that in the USSR from 1948 to the end of the 1980s, and so was economic performance. In 1950-1973, per capita growth more or less kept pace with that of Western Europe, but faltered badly as the economic and political system began to crumble. From 1973-1990, it grew at 0.5% a year compared with 1.9% in Western Europe.

The transition from a command to a market economy was difficult in all of the countries. The easiest part was freeing prices and opening of trade with the West. This ended shortages and queuing, improved the quality of goods and services and increased consumer welfare. However, much of the old capital stock became junk; the labour force needed to acquire new skills and work habits; the legal and administrative systems and the tax/social benefit structure had to be transformed; the distributive and banking networks to be rebuilt from scratch. The travails of transition led to a fall in average per capita income for the group from 1990 to 1993, but it rose by over 3% a year from then to 2001. My projection assumes that this pace of advance can be maintained at least until 2015. In fact, these countries can probably do better than this if they can be integrated into the European Union with better access to its goods, labour, and capital markets, its regional and other subsidies, than they have thus far enjoyed. Present real income levels are only a third of those in Western Europe. Wages are also much lower, but the disparity in skills is much less. The Eastern economies are therefore capable of mounting a catch-up dynamic similar to that of Asia if the integration takes place.

Successor states of former USSR

Fifteen successor states emerged from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. In all of them, there was already a very marked deceleration of economic growth in 1973-1990. There was colossal inefficiency in resource allocation, a very heavy burden of military expenditure and associated spending, depletion and destruction of natural resources.

Capital/output ratios were higher than in capitalist countries. Materials were used wastefully. Shortages created a chronic tendency to hoard inventories. The steel consumption/GDP ratio was four times as high as in the US. The average industrial firm had 814 workers in 1987 compared with 30 in Germany and the UK. Transfer of technology from the West was hindered by trade restrictions, lack of foreign direct investment and very restricted access to foreign technicians and scholars. Work incentives were meagre, malingering on the job was commonplace. [but UBI and pensions will make it better /s]

The quality of consumer goods was poor. Retail outlets and service industries were few. Prices bore little relation to cost. Consumers wasted time queuing, bartering or sometimes bribing their way to the goods and services they wanted. There was an active black market, and special shops for the nomenklatura. There was increasing cynicism, frustration, growing alcoholism and a decline in life expectation. [so like America now?]

Soviet spending on its military and space effort was around 15% of GDP in the 1970s and 1980s, nearly three times the US ratio and five times as high as in Western Europe. There were significant associated commitments to Afghanistan, Cuba, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam and Soviet client states in Africa.

In the 1950s a good deal of agricultural expansion was in virgin soil areas, whose fertility was quickly exhausted. Most of the Aral sea was transformed into a salty desert. Exploitation of mineral and energy resources in Siberia and Central Asia required bigger infrastructure costs than in European Russia. The Chernobyl nuclear accident had a disastrously polluting effect on a large area of the Ukraine.

In 1985-1991 Gorbachev established a remarkable degree of political freedom and liberated Eastern Europe but had no coherent economic policy. From then to end 1999, Yeltsin broke up the Soviet Union, destroyed its economic and political system and moved towards a “market” economy. The economic outcome was a downward spiral of real income for the mass of the population. On average, GDP was nearly 30% lower in 2002 in the 15 republics than in 1990. Fixed investment and military spending fell dramatically, so the drop in private consumption was milder. There were very big changes in income distribution. Under the old system, basic necessities (bread, housing, education, health, crèches and social services) had been highly subsidised by the government or provided free by state enterprises to their workers. These all became relatively more expensive, the real value of wages and pensions was reduced by hyperinflation, and the value of popular savings was destroyed. There were major gains in the income of a new oligarchy. [i.e. cancelling Marxism cannot be overnight]

The new “market” economy is grossly inefficient and unfair in allocating resources. There has been legislation to establish Western style property rights, but in practice accountancy is opaque and government interpretation of property rights is arbitrary. Many businesses are subject to criminal pressure. Property owners such as shareholders or investors are uncertain whether their rights will be honoured. Workers are not sure their wages will be paid.

*This article is an adapted extract from Angus Maddison’s chapter, “The West and the Rest in the International Economic Order”, in Development is Back, OECD Development Centre, 2002.

sound familiar?

so why does Peterson hide this info?

Purchasing power in loaves of bread

Never let this tweet die. Don’t do drugs, kids.

All shades of Marxism act like humans have the same IQ, and it’s well above average.

I call it the Libertarian fallacy, that the whole world thinks like a WEIRD,, white suburban 135IQ autist child of divorce.

The socialism that the Boomers ushered in hard really neglects this point.
Nominal means nothing.

Cultural Marxists only need to use many forms of dysgenic influence (pollution, teratogens like aluminium, endocrine disruptors, GMOs etc) to lower the national IQ to the point where most people go along with Marxism. Cloward-Piven is the trigger. They’ve bumped it ahead because of the ‘awakening’ online. They’ve intentionally retarded white people to go along with their ideology (why they hate us, we needed them to*) hence ‘useful idiot’. It’s the MO.

People like vegans aren’t stupid, they’re spiteful mutants. They hate white people so much they choose to fuck up their hormones and never breed – and encourage teens to do the same!

*Note the BLM portrayal of genetic individualism as EVIL?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2894685/

A world run by China would NOT be kind (white level kind).

Individualism = high IQ group, critical thinking.

 

^ But the banks are the biggest Marxists.

If it’s the best system it shouldn’t be compulsory.

The ‘globalization’ scam:

Weaken nations by enslaving them one after another then repeat as they start to recover, like parasite tourism but parasite production.

Hence, globalism is evil.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

p.s. most slaves are statistically now Asian, so so much for me hating them, eh?

I only hate Commies.

Hi CCP spies.

I could have a lot of fun with this template.

Global debt goes ever higher

Global debt reaches record-high $188T – IMF

this-is-fine.jpeg

“about 230 percent of the world’s economic output”

The wages of dysgenics and usury. If only someone had warned you. But the socialists promised.

It’s impossible to pay off or work your way out. By design, they expect a lot of people to die and free up their real assets to the banks to pay off their “debts”. By phrasing it all as debt white people feel duty bound.

It’s like when the Coyote ran off the cliff but before he looked down.

The rationale of globalization

“The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor” – Voltaire

Profits at the expense of the people.
Without classism, holding the poor down and importing them if need be, there can be no multiculturalism. It’s a gridlock of classes using race to distract us. Imagine England were all white again, purely English, the class oppressions would be obvious. Standard of living would rise because supply would go down, can’t have that. They might reduce their hours and have more kids!
Individual employers put a tiny advance in profit over the health of the nation, its crime rate, its collective IQ, the works. This is unheard of. Yet, who shames them?
I remember reading that only a century ago the Irish rioted because the employers wanted to bring in a horde of Chinese.
It’s clearly treason. Whether the local left do it or the Jews to us, it’s destructive whoever is doing it, they wish to destroy us. Regulations existed for this reason.
By allowing it to become culturally and legally acceptable, they ruin the people while also living here and leeching off the culture as it dies (schools, housing, w/e), because they’re slowly, slowly choking it.

The Left keep stealing class issues so the poor people never figure out who’s doing this to them.

Traps like the benefits cliff are NOT normal.

Capitalism is not exploiting the workers in Third World countries, it’s working with your own people.

If you can’t be successful in one country, your dudebro bravado bizness acumen is fake news.

They care more about that cop killed by immigrants (no suspect names, description, photo) this week than hundreds of thousands of girls and women raped and sometimes murdered – to this day.

But the cop shows all have one aim – believe your oppressor arresting you for opinions and facts is innocent, politically neutral, a good guy, a clever guy in the system like all the crime shows have 145 IQ detectives.

Kiss the boots, lick them, taste them. The compression on your neck is for your own good.

The Party member champagne socialists are doing this to you. The anti-nationalists, that’s why they hate nationalism. Race, religion, IQ issues, all red herrings they deliberately introduced. People notice the leeches, who need them.

Oh, look, actual capitalism. Not “Fuck my fellow whites, I got mine”.

That isn’t capitalism, you’re a crony for foreign countries.

LEARN the difference.

The slave-driver threatening you with starvation is now called employer, that’s so much better. They also dropped noblesse oblige, how convenient! Companies don’t need to train you up, because The World.

The World is always their excuse. The more indebted you are to The World (inc. state schooling, you’re not allowed options) and because “it’s just the way it is”, the more you depend on them for life. They know this. They planned this.

Crony capitalism is anti-white because it’s NWO. Super-corp!

Renting is not owning, you don’t own Kindle books, it’s chain after chain on your living.

Tiny houses – below the legal international levels required for sanity and happiness. Prisons you pay for. And you’re proud of this? Buy a caravan FFS. Car + bed = win on two huge life expenses.

You become slowly more dependent on (((them))) until they introduce literal feeding tubes for your lazy arse.

Then they can charge whatever they want, where else will you go?

It’s like an abusive spouse, who else will have you? It isn’t capitalism, it’s toxic Communism, there’s only one loaf of bread and one line. No choice, no options, no independence. Slavery in all but name.

Look: online shopping – Amazon, computer – Apple, phone – Samsung, all these monopolies. Where’s anti-trust?

Multiculturalism companies that rely on open borders are clearly NWO. Nobody’s saying it, because of controlled ops.

You can’t set up one yourself to compete, locked out by corporate espionage and red tape. State companies is Communism, crony capitalism doesn’t exist. All these monopolies and no options.

The snare gets tighter and tighter everyday.

Stocks go up because national debt goes up. Wake up, this is Communism.

How do you think they’ll pay for the latter? Why the push to get every Deidre and Nancy into the markets?

Why have the Tories been pushing the Austerity Myth? When spending has gone UP? Everything got worse under ‘austerity’ from these ‘conservatives’.

[covered here, search for it, austerity myth] e.g.

Blame Brexit for THAT.

At around 90%, every economy declines. That is a rule of history and economics. That is the tipping point. There will be no recovery.

Choose self-reliance, panic a socialist today.

The promises of socialism are communism in a silk glove. Yes, it’s soft – now.

Wait until it forms a fist.

How many of these trust fund babies scoffing at HuffPo would need to get a real job, if the proles they despise stopped working for daddy’s company and making those stocks productive?

It’s a worker’s market – it should be, based on native birth rate. Under capitalism. Wages should be up, standard of living should be high, property down. Ideal conditions for a baby boom. We are being suppressed, oppressed and misdirected.

They want us crawling over one another like worms, begging them to enslave us.

see also

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/11/26/which-economies-are-recovering/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/the-eugenic-economy/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/18/uk-k-shift/

Boomer bosses

I love how nobody could deny a spiteful Boomer did this, upon seeing it.

There need to be anti-Boomer signs like: Social Security has already run out.

This came close:

I’d remind those in the US&UK, especially the universities, that there’s no such thing as a legal right to retire.

Those professors might realise their pension is just a shiny IOU, can’t have that, they might question Big Brother….

White Working Class against classism

Book list at the end.

Globalization is just a way to ruin the domestic poor pretending to enrich the foreign poor.

It’s a stepping stone to OWG, One World Government via the EU’s empire model.

The middle-class who voted Remain are traitors. Anti-poor, anti-merit, anti-competition.

WWW = White Working Class, as the politicians refer to them. Sounds less heartless.

However, if you keep voting for socialism, you do deserve to get socialism.

If you voted for Tony Blair, you can’t cry he was PC.

If you insulted nationalism, you cannot complain about your nation.

Hatred is largely a waste of time, they want you to waste your time.

I consider myself an expert at that.

They fear your intellect, energy, community, building yourself and one another up, freedom of association, craftsmanship, local trade, beautiful art, social networks, in a word, civilization.

This coming economic turmoil will be blamed on “capitalism”. I heard them plan it.

Anonymous was real, Occupy Wall Street was a false flag.

It’s the bankers. Crony capitalism is no capitalism at all, it’s fascism. Politicians taking bribes to maintain the monopoly of FANG stocks. There’s no free market here. You can’t even refuse to hire problem workers.

The temptation will be to vote in more socialism, especially when the inevitable outcome of socialism, hyperinflation, kicks in. This has been the warm up, warn everyone what is coming as I have been doing for years.

They want you to lose your head, don’t.

Remember who did this to you.

The socialists of multiple decades.

They can only give you what they’ve already taken.

Thankfully, the middle class are finally feeling it. Formerly only the working class lost out to foreigners for the past, oh, two centuries. They didn’t give a solid gold shit about it. They were busy feeding Africa to cause more starving Africans because the pathological altruists “care” and lies about Jesus. Now their oven packs up after two years because it was made by a Chinese 12-year old held in captivity. Slavery was wrong but ignore the rape gangs of immvaders and suicidal people who made your iPhone. Now the “EU citizens” or anyone holding a “British” Empire passport are taking the easy busywork desk jobs from the middle-class traitors, expecting non-existent pensions (teachers) and jobs for life (but eat the rich?)… let them fail.

When the middle-class realise their savings didn’t exist in the Communist “stock” market, mock them for how stupid they called the rest of us. It’s called stock market because we’re livestock.

Their kids can’t go to University now, a billion Chans have daddy to bribe the school with alumni promises.

Push for an investigation of classism and bribery in our Universities, go with the flow.

Do Jewish schools have LGBTQ lessons? You can help, while doing it in an entertaining way.

Let the left eat itself. Don’t appease them or assume they’re well-intentioned or ‘help’ them when they’ve been calling you a Nazi for the past decade. Ignore them. Narcs hate being ignored. Leave them to their diverse echo chamber of high IQ non-whites. Try to force diversity into the schools of their children. Try to force their schools to be coed because Equality Act. They will attempt to project and blame. Don’t let them rope you in and blame you for what they did. Remind Boomers that Millennial voters outnumber them. They “paid in” to a black hole of their own choosing, we needn’t recognize their decision.

This will be sweet, this is revenge, you get to watch the failure of the people who tried to kill you fall by the same strike.

Do not forget. Do not forgive.

The post-war socialists mortgaged the future of their children, drained their economic lifeblood by diverting funds abroad. We’re living in that dystopic future of paying for a debt we never agreed.

Strike from funding your destruction (buy local, help your own, mock idiots, shun agent provocateurs or socialist cultists) but also make it known we must repudiate this intergenerational socialist debt shackled to us in slavery from birth.

You can have FUN with this. I have been for some time (I invented intersectionality*).

Use their tactics against them. Make your enemies fight one another.

That’s from:

http://www.castaliahouse.com/downloads/the-evolutionary-psychology-behind-politics/

The best $7 you will EVER spend. A biologist explained the science of your predicament, mine and that of Ancient Rome. The Left won’t read it, they’re anti-Darwin.

You want it to get to the point where they accuse (j’accuse style) any far-Left idea of being a Nazi plant.

They ruined your potential for prosperity, it’s only cricket you play back.

If you want to deal with the insufferables in your personal life:

http://www.castaliahouse.com/downloads/how-to-deal-with-narcissists/

Good, but not great as the first pick.

Britain was never Great, that was Queen Victoria’s vanity. Empires are melting pots of shit and collapse eventually. Do not take their false dichotomies as intellectual honesty. (Read Thought Prison for that).

England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland are naturally great and don’t need hostilities or foreign intrusion to infantilise them.

They’re scared of your intellect, rouse your passions for what is worthwhile.

See my ‘white advocacy’ post, this is a long time coming. Be subtle, be quiet, be like the march on the institutions…

but grassroots, where snowflakes dare to tread.

Let them die in their ivory tower, suffocated by speech codes. Let them win the battle, have their hollow victory. Set the stage for winning at the foundational level. Be smart. Lose today, seem to be retreating in shame, let them underestimate you and mock you… to do the work that gives you a decisive victory in the culture war. Use the tools you have better.

All Remain voters in the next referendum can be automatically drafted in the EU army, make that petition.

Write to the EU as a “concerned European” asking for official comment.

It’s easy to troll the Guardian set with logic and screencaps.

Don’t “get educated”, be educated. Be civilized. Be informed. Have statistics. Have references. Online access. We repeat the same thing a thousand times instead of linking it. Have rebuttals to rhetoric. Look the part. Start appreciating your culture from the ground up. Teach others. Starve the Beast roaring for your attention, tis a paper tiger made of CB IOUs. There are plenty of academic books about your country. Find them, compose book lists.

e.g. Food in England 1954, English Traditional Recipes, The Mead-Hall, Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race: A Study of the Settlement of England and the Tribal Origin of the Old English People (Classic Reprint), Slavery in Early Mediaeval England from the Reign of Alfred until the Twelfth Century, Albion: Origins of the English Imagination, Albion Ascendant: English History, 1660-1815, Englishness: Twentieth-Century Popular Culture and the Forming of English Identity, John Ray’s English Proverbs, Malthus and the Making of the Modern World, Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction, 1300-1840, Food, Eating and Identity in Early Medieval England (Anglo-Saxon Studies), The World We Have Lost and its sequel.

Put the di in diversity by showing the people something to compare it with.

That’s the secret to cultural relevance. Spoil their cheerleader effect.

You can’t sit there and shrug when people ask what you stand for.

It’s a Hollywood tactic.
SHOW, DON’T TELL.

We have something other generations don’t: the internet.

Encourage a reprint of “The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems”, it’s important.
You’ll know when you read it.
Also the essay “The Invention of Europe” by Emmanuel Todd.

I’m proving my nerd credentials with this post. Hell hath no fury like a bitch told she was too white to ever get tenure, so don’t even bother.

*I left a clue in the name, this was the rationale:

How to destroy morons? Easy, greater morons. They neutralise one another, it’s physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

I knew they wouldn’t appreciate the reference. It’s easier to clean up the kooky looking lefties. Open borders will ruin their safe space too. If the country can’t protect its borders, safe spaces are racist.

Having servants makes you happier

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2017/07/18/1706541114.full

No shit, someone alert Buckingham Palace.

SCIENCE.

 

Turns out, money can buy happiness.

 

You think Elon Musk launders his own underwear?

They say you all have the same number of hours in a day.

Bull-SHIT.

I’ve met these people who think their shit doesn’t stink.

These self help gurus don’t clean their own shithouse.

Yet they deflect and shame you like you’re lazy. Four Hour Workweek from Mr Expensive Tuition.

One of the most stressful life events, moving, can be ‘outsourced’!

https://paseattle.com/2016/08/20/moving-heres-personal-assistant-can-smooth-transition/

Why do you think they love immigrants so much?

Illegal wages – slave labour.

Nobody points out blatant classism.

Show me one working class politician.

 

Globalization exists so they can abuse foreigners across borders because abusing locals is more legally challenging.

 

Cinderella is literally about a woman marrying out of the need to do housework.

That’s the fairytale.

That’s the magical thing.

 

Give conservative women a housekeeper, dammit!

It’s cheaper than a divorce!

White woman isn’t a slave, the heartwarming folklore tale.

Buying Marital Bliss: Time-Saving Purchases Promote Relationship Satisfaction

https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=53939

If it turns your head, “help” is why rich women have more energy for sex.

It isn’t the fucking spirulina smoothies.*

Most men don’t do manual labour anymore, most women still do. Studies only look at the middle class for this stuff.

They don’t get it. The woman on her feet for at least seven hours has it harder than the social-media browsing office worker. Who cleans the cleaner’s house? Why do women claim they can’t afford more children? When are men “run off their feet”? Why do women take longer to save for retirement while men work over-time, where are they, what are they doing in those prime dinnertime hours? Whose work uniform of clothing, haircare and make-up is more expensive? Whose ‘trims’ cost far more despite literally removing less hair per trip? Add up what women do against what they’re expected to do. It isn’t lazy.

Disagreements about chores are a primary source of relationship conflict: both men and women become frustrated working a “second shift” at home. Using data from nine studies of cohabitating working adults in committed relationships (N = 4,316), we provide the first empirical evidence that couples who make time-saving purchases in a typical month report greater relationship satisfaction. We also document why and when buying time promotes relationship satisfaction: Time saving purchases enable couples to spend more quality time together, protect couples from conflict, and are most likely to promote relationship satisfaction when couples are faced with controllable (vs. uncontrollable) stressors. These findings suggest a relatively simple solution to a critical source of marital conflict: spend money to buy time.

The Industrial Revolution caused a lot of divorces.

Suddenly, the sexes worked apart.

*Scum drinking scum.

https://www.livescience.com/48853-spirulina-supplement-facts.html

Teenagers used to work in place of immigrants but state schools refuse to let them go below the age of eighteen now. Also their minimum wage is lower, which is slavery. The anti-social habits of modern teens are the typical depressed habits of the unemployed, who feel useless.
Middle-class frat brats holding tiki torches can be laughed off. What terrifies the Left in its nightmares is a working class capitalist demo. Wages, work hours, immigrants being held above the law (protected class is against the tenet of blind justice). Offer all three and you’ll win any election.
UBI ignores how adult mortality is most predictive at retirement and how unemployed people are almost all depressed. This isn’t pocket money from parents, these are adults. Infantilization is an abuse tactic. The poor are already infantilized are not knowing what’s good for them, high time preference (unlike spoiled brats?) and degenerate sinners (criticism of welfare queens instead of deadbeat sperm donors, who made them).

Poor people binge-drink, middle-class people are alcoholics.
Poor people are crazy, middle-class people have intermittent explosive disorder.
Poor people are stupid, middle-class kids have dyslexia, ADD, on the non-existent “spectrum” everyone is on.*
Poor people are fat, middle-class people are victims of a sedentary office environment.
Poor rape victims must’ve been prostitutes, middle-class ones are real victims.etc.etc.etc.

*If everyone is on the DISABILITY spectrum, no-one is.
Logically, if one metric of psychiatry applies, so does IQ. Doesn’t that fit the symptoms better?

China’s been buying American food supply

Don’t skip this one. If you eat, this is important.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/how-china-purchased-a-prime-cut-of-americas-pork-industry/

That is a national security issue.
You need the food supply for your own nation.
I’ve yet to hear any politician here say this is a problem. For the whole West.
Britain is doing it too, as covered with our heritage pork industry but here’s America.

This is a plot.

“These are not Russian communists. They like Americans.”

Traitors, traitors everywhere.

Casual Russophobia, the shell game of politics.

Chinese companies, at the urging of their government, have launched a global buying spree, a new phase in their unprecedented economic experiment. And they’re targeting a resource that climate scientists, economists, the U.S. government, even Wall Street, all forecast will become dangerously scarce in the coming decades: food.”
“Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.
“We have a situation in the world food economy today where the growth in demand is exceeding the supply,” said Lester Brown, a food economist and founder of the Earth Policy Institute.
Food – namely crops such as soy, wheat and corn from which most other food products, such as pasta, bread and livestock meat, are derived – is in dwindling abundance as the world’s population grows ever larger, adding 220,000 mouths to feed every day.”

Need I say I told you so or is that Malthus’ place?

Thessalonians comes to mind.

“It is part of the transition from an age of surplus to one of scarcity,” Brown said.’

Read: FAMINE.

“The world is set for a geopolitical struggle over food.”

Those trigger war, we need a pandemic.

The Chinese government already is dealing with looming food shortages within its own borders as tens of millions are eating more as they move from poverty into the middle class. The government is pushing Chinese businesses – both state-owned and privately held – to gobble up agricultural resources from around the world, including Africa, Europe and the United States.”

That should be illegal as part of national security.

Food security, clue is in the name.

“With the Smithfield purchase, a Chinese company now owns 1 in 4 pigs raised in the U.S.”

But I’m imagining things and why do prices keep going up?

You’re funding fat Chinese citizens. To learn who rules over you….

“The question for U.S. lawmakers is: Did the Smithfield takeover represent business as usual for international commerce, or did it signal a concerted effort to control food supplies by one of the world’s most powerful governments?”

#yawn

“If the Chinese government was involved in the 2013 deal, some influential U.S. lawmakers say they need to take action to protect against foreign intervention in a vital U.S. resource.”

It’s more vital than stealing weapons technology in colleges.

“He testified to Congress that the Chinese government has no management control over Shuanghui.
That, however, is not the case.”

Ooooof course it is.

“a research lab that had genetically engineered the leanest pigs on earth”

Why modern pork isn’t as healthy as real pork. You can’t even get fatback anymore.
Bacon is a traditional Saxon meal, it merits legal protected status.
He goes on to blame the ‘shareholders’. No, put on your big boy pants and do the difficult job of telling them No.

“And Colaco knew Pope’s interest in buying a 20 percent stake in China’s largest meat company, Shuanghui International.”

How? Spying. And that’s bribery, the exchange ‘offer’.

The Chinese already consume half of the world’s pork,

greedy piggies

and they are growing wealthier and hungrier for meat every year. In a single generation, China’s fast-growing wealth has transformed a nation of impoverished rice and noodle eaters into the world’s largest middle class, which can increasingly afford meat in its diet.”

Any vegan who starts on the West instead of China doesn’t understand math. They calculate per person (wrong) but when you consider volumes, Asia is clearly starving out the rest of the world, including their precious Africa.
Most Westerners have been priced out of their birthright because suppliers are allowed to sell to foreigners first, rich ones.

Remember how the Chinese are eating most of it for the gaslighting lower down.

“Wan had transformed a government-owned slaughterhouse, where he was appointed manager in 1984, into China’s largest meat company”

Coincidence, I’m sure.

“Pope proposed to Wan that they take a 20 percent stake in each other’s companies. Smithfield would gain a powerful ally in Wan, who is politically connected to China’s top leaders and also a member of the National People’s Congress.”

Is Trump going to move on any of this?

“The partnership would be equal, reflecting the fact that although Smithfield Foods generated more than twice the revenue and was far more advanced in terms of global reach and pork technology than Shuanghui, growth rates in China were far higher.”

Doesn’t sound equal. That actually sounds like a downside, demand side loses in capitalism.

“It was a match made in free-market heaven.”

‘Libertarians’ are whores for the richest foreigner.
Treasonous whores.

Using the word free while selling out your country. For shame.

If libertarians didn’t sell the farm (cough) to China after WW2 their population would’ve stabilized as well and we wouldn’t have these problems.

And since when do we care so much about rich Chinese over our own people? That’s their Government’s problem, not ours. The rank classism of this reeks.

“Pope picked up the phone. Colaco cut straight to the deal. The Chinese were ready, he said. But it wasn’t a partnership they wanted.”

Classic manipulation tactic and the greedy piggy fell for it. Modern men are weak.

I’d have laughed and slammed the phone down.

“Smithfield is not for sale,” Pope shot back.’

Sure he did – and everybody clapped.

“But I do like this discussion,” he finished.’

Crooked CEOs are worse than politicians. The latter you can vote out and hang.

“Both Pope and Colaco told me that they remembered the call as cordial and succinct.”

You agreed to sell a part of your country’s history quickly?

“The Chinese didn’t want to save him. They wanted to buy him.”

Well, he is a whore. They were right.

New Money, they think if they buy the world they ‘win’ and become the new dominant Empire.
Treat everyone like a whore for sale is their MO.

“The U.S. Treasury Department was in the midst of reviewing the takeover for any national security risks. That review, by an obscure office within the department, was to remain classified per U.S. law.”

It should’ve been cancelled, simple as.
Here’s the part I mentioned before, Americans priced out of America.

“Two years earlier, the Chinese government had signaled its strong desire for overseas agriculture. It had unveiled its five-year plan, which amounts to the Communist Party’s roadmap for the country’s economy. A major focus of this plan: buying up overseas farmland and foreign food companies.

Why is American homesteading land so expensive, Americans?

In 2011, the year the five-year plan was announced, Chinese nationals owned $81 million worth of U.S. farmland.

Repatriate it, simply refuse to acknowledge their ownership claim as valid due to foreign security issues. We do it all the time.

By the end of 2012, the Chinese owned $900 million in U.S. farmland – a 1,000 percent increase – making them the largest buyers that year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

You should’ve known when they changed the soldier breeding programme to two children despite over-population.

The Smithfield deal included another $480 million in U.S. farmland, which would push the Chinese stake to nearly $1.4 billion in less than two years.”

Successful nations don’t sell land or companies to outsiders.
This should be the law, it needs to be enforced. It’s a type of border control.

“He testified that the Chinese government had absolutely no management control in Shuanghui.”

He lied, was he under oath?

“Pope explained that the deal would create jobs in the U.S., not destroy them. Shuanghui’s plan to import more American pork would ramp up production at Smithfield’s 460 hog farms, creating more money for farmers and more jobs at the slaughterhouses.”

And more food to a foreign army to kill all the people you ‘gave’ jobs.
Don’t work with Commies, eventually they’ll shoot you too.

“I think it is good for America. I think this is the opportunity America has been looking for to import jobs.”

Wait, visas?

“Stabenow pushed back. She wanted to know why Smithfield could not increase its sales to China as an American company and why only a takeover by a Chinese firm would open the doors to the world’s largest pork market. The Chinese government was unfairly blocking American hog farmers from exporting there, she said.”

A patriot. They ignored her, didn’t they?
She was right, so they did.

“American grain companies had supported the deal. In the past five years, China has become their biggest foreign customer.”

You say ‘American’.

Is it (((American)))?

“Roberts lampooned criticism of the deal, asking Pope, “Did you realize you were the victim of a Chinese communist plot?”
Laughter broke out in the hearing. Pope chuckled.”

They know it’s treason.

“For Wan, who had served as a foot soldier in Mao Zedong’s army….”

Was he one of the cannibals?
[Probably].

“Shuanghui is now China’s largest meat company, and with the addition of Smithfield Foods, it has become the world’s largest producer of packaged meats, pumping out millions of tons of hot dogs and sausages every year.”

As American as your hot dogs?
Armies need protein.
The signs were there.

“The campus also has a massive refrigerated warehouse larger than a football field. It houses something found only in China: a national pork reserve. Much as the U.S. government maintains a strategic oil reserve, China stashes away vast amounts of frozen pork in case of price inflation or war. The mammoth warehouse I was staring at housed 110 million pounds. It is one of the many pork-reserve warehouses that Shuanghui operates for the government across China.”

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED.

“or war”, they write blithely.

Hoping you won’t notice. But we did.

“He said Smithfield’s processing equipment was three times faster.”

Great deal for them – America not so much.

“It also stated something surprising. Shuanghui is required to adhere to Beijing’s five-year plan, the Communist Party’s national economic agenda. And the document was clear. Shuanghui meets its obligations and follows the path laid out by the Communist Party.”

Are you surprised? I’m not.

“Despite its public listing in Hong Kong, Shuanghui answers to the Chinese government – going beyond regulatory compliance. It receives directives from Beijing, and it follows them. The company’s candidness surprised me, especially because U.S. senators had been sparring over this exact topic a year earlier. Here was conclusive proof.”

Is the sell-out in jail? No? Wow, almost like a Cabal is protecting him.

“He broke it down for me. The Chinese government acts like a de facto board of directors for the country’s domestic industries – even for publicly traded companies like Shuanghui. The Communist Party issues the five-year plan, and Shuanghui is expected to follow that direction. The government can say it wants the Chinese meat industry to employ certain strategies, and all domestic companies are expected to adhere. Yet the day-to-day management of the company, how it chooses to carry out those directives, is left to the company’s management. And if there is no directive, the company is free to proceed as it views best.”

Communism.

“For helping carry out the government’s agenda, Shuanghui received a $4 billion loan to take over Smithfield. The loan was approved in a single day.”

Woooow.

“I asked Robert Wan why the government was so interested in Shuanghui’s business.
“Pork is considered a national security issue in China,” he said.”

BOOM.

Pork is considered a national security issue in China”

oh, but the guy acting white was really gracious? He was laughing at you.

You can’t spend their fake money if you’re dead.

“They are entering a new phase of development, one that is taking them outside of China’s borders as they look to acquire companies and farmland overseas.”

How was WW2 won? Farms.

Watch the farms.

“The jobs will remain. But they will be lower-quality, lower-paid jobs of hog slaughtering and hog breeding,” she said. “The higher-paid, higher-value-added jobs that deal with marketing the products, processing the food, the technology development, that will go.”

Again, Libertarians are whores. Free market is code for globalist. We used to just call those traitors.

“With its five-year plan in 2011, the Chinese government identified meat processing as a strategically important industry, and with the Smithfield purchase, the country gained access to the world’s most advanced animal rearing, slaughtering and meat processing and distribution technology, she said.”

National security, you’ve boosted theirs.

“Haley has testified before Congress several times on how China’s growth is damaging the U.S. economy.”

They ignored her.

“The Chinese will quickly import Smithfield’s technology to China”
“The United States increasingly will become a large hog farm for the Chinese”

Think of the cost if they included the oil barrels to ship. Why isn’t that law?
Globalization will fail for that reason, spending $20 to send a product halfway around the world and ‘save’ 20 cents is doomed to fail.

“Hog farming is one of the most polluting industries in the world, and so that will occur in Smithfield and elsewhere, the 400-plus farms that Smithfield and now Shuanghui owns around the United States,”

Well at least America gains in pollution.

“But here it is in its simplest form: Haley has found that China begins by importing the technological know-how and raw materials from the U.S. Then Chinese businesses use cheap labor to manufacture products for export back to the United States – offering lower prices in direct competition with established businesses in the U.S. This part of her theory is obviously not new.
But here is where she advances the conversation: She has found that even in industries in which the labor cost of the final product is relatively low, meaning it accounts for 2 to 7 percent of the total, Chinese companies still are able to sell the product for 25 to 30 percent less than their American competitors. In other words, China’s big advantage is not just the cheaper labor.
So what is it? Heavy subsidies from the Chinese government, she says.”

War. Trade war.
The Trojan Horse of Trade.

When you think about it, globalism is really a way of saying international Marxism because it erases national borders and fulfills the “to each according to his ability…” dogma.

“Chinese businesses are able to undercut the prices of American producers and begin to control a larger and larger share of the market.”

You need to shame people for buying Chinese.

The oil barrels used to ship, the slave labour, lots of ways to go about it.

The quality argument, they did knowingly sell toxic baby formula.

“In two to five years, we will start noticing major changes in the United States. China will be in many agricultural sectors, not just pork. China will start acquiring much larger farms, for example. China will start consolidating,” she said. “So, in these oligopolistic industries, such as pork, where four manufacturers control over 75 percent of the American pork industry, there will be much price cutting, layoffs, etc., as competitors start feeling the hot breath of China on their necks.”

That’s now.
Good luck MAGA with that millstone.

I don’t hate China, as some shills have claimed, I love my people in America. If America fails, we’re on the block next.
China is oppressing them in the most under-handed ways in a manner tantamount to a declaration of war. Stealing food supply? Super-villain territory.

BTW, you’re still paying China foreign aid.

““The Chinese, in my opinion, are behaving rationally. Food is in short supply in China. It’s a source of unrest in China,” Haley said. “They have OK’d the acquisition of agriculture in the United States to further Chinese interests.”

Anti-American interests.

“China and the U.S. are roughly the same size geographically – about 3.7 million square miles. But China has more than four times as many people to feed.

r-selection ends predictably
the checks won’t clear eventually

And it has less arable land than the U.S.”

As in, without buying America’s food security, they’d instantly lose a war.
It’s cheaper for them to buy America itself than buy from America every year.

“Moving toward a meat-centric diet has put an incredible strain on China’s agriculture system. Simply put, Chinese farmers can no longer keep up.”

By buying from China, you’re directly supporting the Chinese Communist government.

Communists make the best slavers, they actually believe they’re doing good.

‘Chinese officials only recently have recognized the futility of their long-cherished national goal of food self-sufficiency, said Fred Hu, former head of Goldman Sachs for greater China.

Not high IQ then. As if the Marxism didn’t give it away.

China will have to import a large quantity of foods from all over the world,” said Hu, a Chinese national who helped raise funds for Shuanghui and now advises his government.

Until we blockade it. Which we’ll have to, to feed our own people.

He agreed with Haley that food is increasingly a matter of political stability for the Chinese government.
“We have a one-party state, and the Communist Party depends on its ability to deliver economic prosperity and consumer satisfaction,” Hu said. “In that way, for the severe shortage of any particular food item, or very significant price inflation, that could be a source of public discontent.”’

The way to beat China is ruthless capitalism, stop buying from them and jack up the prices.

“The government also ordered its domestic food producers to scour the globe, buying foreign companies and agricultural resources that China could control in the coming decades”

During a war, your enemy owns your food. Who wins?

Seige warfare on vulnerable domestic civilians is sneaky little ratbag warfare. Typical r-types. Attack the children, elderly and sick. They suffer first under food supply disruptions.

China is securing food supplies – increasingly, high-end food such as meat – for its middle class.”

You said national security, that means military.

“The U.S. still enjoys probably the highest living standards in the world,” he said. “My advice for you in the West, after your criticisms, is that you probably should eat less meat to control weight and to stay healthy, right?”

Gaslighting microdick. That’s a Mean Girls tier insult.

He just tried to neg white people. They’re really insecure, huh?

Actually eating meat is healthier and Americans are fat due to processed carbs, they know this.

Trump should specially stamp every product from China or a Chinese company so people have informed consent when buying.

That’s the best, simplest solution. Totally legal, more legal than the current labelling.

PRODUCT OF CHINA in huge letters on the front with the Marxist symbol in blood red.

So other people can see you’re buying it too.

After all, informed consent. People should know which government and ideology their money supports.

Actually, why isn’t there a public list of companies that seem domestic but are actually foreign owned? People have a right to boycott if they please.

“Everyone wants to see China succeed. It’s an old civilization,” she said.

No, if they win, you lose. Zero sum. They’re heartless monsters, their culture is one of torture.

“But it is our government’s prerogative and our government’s responsibility to look out for the interests of U.S. consumers and U.S. industry, just as the Chinese are looking out for their industry and their customers.”

trans. Do your job. You’re not Mother Theresa.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who asked Haley to testify before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, said the U.S. government needs to do more to protect U.S. agriculture.
She is calling on the Treasury Department, which reviews foreign acquisitions of major U.S. businesses, to expand the definition of national security to include food. Such a change could prevent future takeovers of America’s farm and food companies.
Food is too vital an industry for the American people to allow it to be undercut by the Chinese government in the way that it has happened in other industries, Stabenow said when I visited her office in Washington.
“Food security is national security,” she said. “It’s as much a threat for Americans if we don’t control our own food supply as it is if another country gets some kind of defense secret.”

Food production is a defense secret.

In tiny text again: “Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.”

Pope still denies the Government connection, meaning he knew all along.

“But for the first time, he publicly acknowledged the Chinese government’s five-year plan.”

Traitor.

“In many respects, this is carrying out the government’s five-year plan, which is to improve the quality and the security of their food supply,”

Keyword: security.

“Pope said Smithfield Foods now is transferring its technology to China”

Muh jobs!
Maybe Pope giving a blowjob under the table to the Chinese Government.

“It will process the meat in China and sell it under the Smithfield brand, according to the company.”

How many American brands have been gutted?
Do the American people not have a right to know in the labeling?

It’s false advertising to use an American brand for a non-American company.

Cultural appropriation is serious business. Especially when it’s used to subvert the culture in question.

“I handed him the Bank of China document that stated the government’s financial support for the deal.”
“I think the concern that others should have is that there’s going to be more foreign companies wanting to buy U.S. companies,” Pope said. “We need to have a bit of concern that what we’ve got, others value more than we do.”

The nerve.

Your choice, America. Label your products correctly or allow foreign governments to literally buy your food over you.

Currently, a lot of “your” food is reserved for a Chan or Wan. The good stuff.

Oh, and stop remittance. That’s an easy one. You hemorrhage money there. Tax it to the hilt.

Richard Spencer tries to cuckold libertarians

They’re irrelevant but O.K.

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

Globalization will die with multiculturalism. Hint: they’re the same thing, that’s why this ploy could never, ever work, Dick.

Those people don’t listen, they follow. That’s all they do. They’re Bernie lite.
Nobody plays Follow the Leader better than shitlibs.
Remember, they are left wing. Although to claim anti-fascism is a leftist myth, looking to history. Lenin, Stalin, Mao… maybe Putin.

http://freespiritedmind.com/richard-spencer-crashes-a-libertarian-conference-and-gets-thrown-out/

including because?

He quotes Ayn Rand (I know, I know).
And what a weaksauce appeal to authority. Trite AF.

“Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values, and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge—which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.”

This predates the field of genetics, behavioural genetics, forensic anthropology, criminology and widespread acultural IQ testing.

Was Einstein’s brain normal? Not really. You can’t use Mac OS on an MS Windows PC properly and neither can you expect the performance range of one higher successful group e.g. Jews like Rand, from the platform of people who can barely stop murdering their seed crop (see Africa, and the tragic, huge failure of the Millennium Villages.)

http://reason.com/archives/2013/10/04/the-big-aid-debate-is-over

Yes, that’s a shitlib site. I can stab them with their own shanks.

Even introversion/extraversion is neurological and thereby, inherited. Look up the entire region of twin studies to reveal how laughably wrong these claims are. Is mental illness the person’s fault, then, or something you can inherit? Really pin them down on the problematic consequences of making everyone 100% responsible for their biology, when none of us chose to be born.

“by physical factors beyond his control” – biology?

Rand wasn’t a scientist. Nobody ever asked Curie. Curie FTW.

Even the most diehard Tabula Rasa fan (clinging onto a philosophy to the point of insanity) would admit culture predates our birth and gives a heavy influence so hypothetically, still a bust.
Libertarianism seeks to duplicate cultures like a socioeconomic equivalent of Copy and Paste – and that’s why it will always be destined to fail.

People are not the same. We have DNA tests, MRI scans and performance metrics. You don’t see many white men winning the 100m sprint.
At this point they look retarded, painfully slow on the uptake, at least half a century out of date, but I guess autism is all about refusing to concede overt stupidity. Pity the rest of us can see. Libertarianism is the doctrine where you must assume as your prior a belief, nay, a faith, that everyone in the world is the same intelligence level of a 120IQ white man with Aspergers living in a capital city and desperate for money to buy female attention.
If some people are less able than they are, they might need to feel guilty for once in their spoiled suburban childhood lives. They might pause to think – wait, maybe I didn’t earn all of this? ‘Check your privilege’ applies to these people because they use a nonsense condition as an excuse to be a complete, unrepentant arsehole. The male SJW’s natural home. But libertarianism has never been tried! – because there aren’t enough autistic MENSA card holders in the world. In most parts of it, they’d be murdered within five minutes for citing their paper IQ in an argument.

Libertarians want to have as much money as Republicans but never to feel guilty about it. Because child labour is so much better morally, all the way in China than ignoring minimum wages in America.

“This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge”

like language? or some little thing called epigenetics, where your ancestors can dictate your own risk of heart disease? why would medicine need that information? that’s just silly

“which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science.”

no such thing, it is always pending further evidence
anti-science liars like to spread that myth though

Science isn’t a damsel with ‘honour’ to protect, you can discuss anything. ANY-THING. That is literally the whole point. No subject is EVER off the table. The method can ALWAYS be applied. NO exceptions, Mr Pope!

The kind of person to un-ironically quote this.

You can see where the autistic arrogance of atheistkult feeds in. I’m pretty sure 85% of ‘high-functioning’ aka not real autism is hubris.

He claims it’s collectivism, because Rand does. Nationalism is not collectivism, globalism is.

Libertarianism is globalism. Nationalism is capitalist, competitive. Libertarianism tells the First World it has earned its position over the Third because the truth might make them feel bad about the slave labour.

“appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.”

aka Literally what Darwin said in Origin of the Species. He opens by discussing animal breeding.

Different breeds of animal are different races within the same species.
Biology applies to all species, men are not exempt from evolution.

I’m not a racist but-

rracistjustifypedo

Tumblr can be very based.
A visual demonstration of why ad hominem and poisoning the well don’t work, also see the Trump administration.

Instead these people try to gaslight us that our realpolitik concerns are bigoted/uneducated and hence, not REAL. Politics is simply returning to its historical norm, that’s why nobody can stop it, it’s becoming local again. It’s anti-globalist, the failed experiment that led to multiculturalism and mass immigration because capitalist workers are interchangeable and fuck min. wage laws in the First World. Globalism is supranational, Global Capitalism. You think they’d give a shit about third world countries if they had banned child labour? Controlled their population of future child workers? But when they’re adults, they’re more expensive and can revolt, better send them to Europe. They got no factories there. Fuck the First World poor, let’s be like China and enslave our children or cause the prole workers to commit suicide rather than put together Tracy’s iPhone so she can protest capitalism, Starbucks in hand. ‘omg your problems aren’t real u loser. sad!’

whitegenocideacademia

The K-shift is exposing them like a storm exposes worms.

This, after Hillary Clinton used the term in a major speech.

That one slip of a searchable term might’ve handed Trump the White House.

Do you really think Democrats have the level of political engagement or attention to watch those whole speeches? The MSM redpilled against itself. At this point, they’re just making shit up because reporting reality is too hard.

That’s when you feign a sucker punch to the face but swiftly kick them in the nuts. Obvious!

the art of war is deception, young  shitlords sithlords

it’s based on-

it’s based

If racism is possible against the global minority of white people, it can’t be used to guilt trip because it’s no longer exclusive, like an EBT card.

Nobody else has made this connection to globalism yet, I’m the first.

Ask: Who pays the people guarding the borders?

Even the reddest Commie will listen to the economic argument therein. Globalism pits the poor of every country against one another in a war for profit for pigs.

As for me?

I set up the dominoes to watch them fall, dude.

chaos

If I can do a little good with my god-tier destruction abilities, yippy kai yay.

I’m not here for celebrity, I’m here to change history.

How can I cut them in such a way that it’ll still hurt in fifty years’ time?
Verbal shivs are legal and I find that racist. Bitchy putdowns are homosexual art.
Memes are education for the morally and verbally impaired.

shitposting

ah yes toast drinking damon ian nodding

Who suspects the girl? Sexist bitches.

Every time I hear something terribly untrue about my kind, assuming I’m azure-pilled;

sickofyourshit

literally me

hide teh power level

soon baby

soon