Good old days

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/966897/britons-old-days-job-opportunities-uk-living-traditional-values

You miss Empire.

This is philia surging back.

Statistically correct. Higher life satisfaction, social trust, lower crime, no terrorism, no untouchable aristos you cannot insult (sorry, would a guillotine be less offensive?), homogeneity of demographics, higher birth rate, better economy, higher culture, better art, less media intrusion and celebrity cult, social mobility for natives, no foreign job crushing from globalisation, no victim culture and defamation monstering mobs.

Most importantly, the barometers of success and maturity were obtainable if you worked for them.

Getting a place, getting married, starting a family.

Eventually retiring.

Nobody can afford to now.

That’s the main thing, a genocidal suppression of the life cycle.

The legal serfs

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/content/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

“The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.”

“We, the British people have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence… but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it… we do not.”

Britons little changed in DNA since Ice Age

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html

Despite invasions by Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Normans, and others, the genetic makeup of today’s white Britons is much the same as it was 12,000 ago, a new book claims.

In The Tribes of Britain, archaeologist David Miles says around 80 percent of the genetic characteristics of most white Britons have been passed down from a few thousand Ice Age hunters.

Note the precision of language. That is a scientist.

Technically, there’s no such thing as British.

There was no British Empire, it was the English Empire. You didn’t see the Welsh fucking up anyone.

Despite all the Guardian articles trying to make out we were awful, the People aren’t fooled.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-people-are-proud-of-colonialism-and-the-british-empire-poll-finds-a6821206.html

 

YouGov found 44 per cent were proud of Britain’s history of colonialism while only 21 per cent regretted that it happened. 23 per cent held neither view.

The same poll also asked about whether the British Empire was a good thing or a bad thing: 43 per cent said it was good, while only 19 per cent said it was bad. 25 per cent responded that it was “neither”.

Americans don’t understand how political and meaningless the term British is.

Since the collapse of the Empire, it’s been meaningless.

People are either English, Welsh, Irish or Scottish. Sometimes a combination.

There are also little islands like Jersey that have their own flags.

Cooler than ours but derived from England’s original Three Lions heraldry.

The British is typically, Great Britain, and the union of the four countries is incredibly recent (Union Act 1707, 1800). It’s a term about what the Queen owns, similar to the UK but without pesky parts of Ireland.  Jane Austen’s novels are older than Great Britain. England is a country in its own right, Parliament and the Queen are based there. It’s the central country.

The British Isles covers the most landmass. It’s huge. It’s geographic and includes a lot of tiny islands.

So again, if you’re discussing where a person is from, to say they’re from Britain is technically incorrect. At least, what Britain? Great? Isles? What? It’s like saying someone is European, unless you mean the continent (correct but vague) you cannot mean the legal construct (EU) because nobody’s DNA originates from a legal fiction. There is no such physical PLACE. There is no DNA for Britain, (sometimes ancient Briton, as in the study above) but it’s either English from England, Irish from Ireland, Scottish from Scotland or Welsh from Wales. British is meant to be from Britain but nowadays everybody has a British passport, a passport grants citizenship and financial entitlements it changes nothing about your DNA. To refer to blood, genes and ancestry, you cannot be British. It would be like referring to your occupation, it’s a legal thing.

Recently they’ve tried to claim dilution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5312697/DNA-map-Britain-Ireland-reveals-Viking-genes.html

“Researchers have found 50 distinct genetic clusters (classified into broader groups) in Ireland and Britain”

That contradicts your headline.

Anonymous UK for Independence Day

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/anonymous-hackers-back-brexit-vote-8274133

Anonymous hackers have thrown their weight behind Brexit in a scathing tweet blasting European elites who put wealth over people.

As millions of Brits cast their votes in yesterday’s historic EU referendum , the secretive global hacking network took to Twitter to pledge their support to the Leave campaign.

Using the hastag #VoteLeave, the Anonymous affiliated account @YourAnonNews insisted that a vote to exit the European Union would send a clear message to “neoliberals” whose trade agreements put wealth first.

I have a lot of work ahead. In the coming years, especially the coming months.

This is going to be exhausting.

Posting may be patchy. I may go missing for long periods of time again.

Sorry.

Queen and country come first.

It comes after Anonymous unveiled its plan to take the political system and remodel it – with the help of its own party.

Although previously targeting politics from the outside, THumP is intended to help Anonymous get into the political world and change it from within.

World stocks headed for one of the biggest slumps on record, and billions of dollars were wiped off the value of European companies.

Excuse me while I staunch my bleeding heart.

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

weareallshitpostershere chaos

 

Link: Politesse, Briton to American

http://www.oldmagazinearticles.com/poet-robert-nichols#.Vs4zU_mLTZ6

When Americans insult me for rare candor, I must laugh. You beg for the truth and complain when it’s served. It would be unwise to expect your cultural forebears to have the same equitable spirit that formed your union.

We will either tell you a thing or refuse to comment. Never complain, never explain?

The middle class lie. They think they’re subtle.

Link: What would Brexit look like?

The possibilities are limitless, the freedoms available make it hard to pin down.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/what-brexit-would-look-like-for-britain/

‘So what’s your alternative?’ demand Euro-enthusiasts. ‘D’you want Britain to be like Norway? Or like Switzerland? Making cuckoo clocks? Is that what you want? Is it? Eh?’

Could hardly be worse than how we’re doing now.
http://country.eiu.com/united-kingdom

So when every non-EU territory from the Isle of Man to Montenegro has access to the European free trade area, which model should we follow? The nations arguably most comparable to Britain, being neither microstates nor ex-communist countries, are Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. All three prefer their current deal to ours: 60 per cent of Icelanders, 79 per cent of Norwegians and 82 per cent of Swiss oppose EU membership. Who can blame them? Norway and Switzerland are the wealthiest and second-wealthiest nations on Earth.

What if we’re dumb enough to vote to Stay?

Many European federalists actively campaign for Britain to be given an economics-only relationship — what Jacques Delors calls ‘privileged partnership’ and Guy Verhofstadt ‘associate membership’. It would allow them to push ahead with a European army, a common tax system and so on, while Britain led an outer tier of some 20 European states and territories, part of a common -market but not a common government.

WW3.

Why would they need us so badly?

http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing-europe.asp

europemilitarypowercountryranking2016

We’re the most powerful military country in Europe.

Who’s the competition, against a Federal Europe?

10greatestmilitarypowers2016

Yeah, America. This is your problem too.

UK Universities want to lie and say Africans were here first

http://mantalk.mobi/British-Universities-Change-History-by-Teaching-Students-Africans-Were-First-Settlers

Some of the most reputable British educators have been corrupting the minds of young students by lying about the roots of their country. They have suggested teaching a course which is built out of the lies of insecure minorities that feel a white Great Britain shouldn’t be a cornerstone of its history but, rather, its history should reflect the morals of current society. The course which I’m referring to teaches students that the first British settlers were actually Africans. This, of course, is nothing more than bullshit which should be shamed, but since the story has been published, little to no changes have been made. The deplorable act of revising a nation’s history and culture were not done because of new discoveries which demanded the history book accommodate the new findings but, instead, the changes were made as a way to dethrone the white Englishman in his own country.

It’s such a barefaced lie.

It fails on every factual level.

Even if that were true hypothetically, they’d have evolved lighter skin and so on. Making it false still.

Nothing scares them like the truth on anthropological origins (Multi-Regional).

The politically driven curriculum will be distributed to thousands of students at Oxford and Cambridge who believe they are getting an objective history. Instead, they are being fed a Marxist fairy tale that never happened. The course’s creator shamelessly admits the whole perspective is made up, fabricated and absolutely fiction; however, feels it’s important that the English population address their ‘white male-dominated’ view of history and society.

As opposed to current academia, which is totally true?

What’s next, since they’re pushing We Wuz Kangs Afrocentrism? Magic Melanin Theory?