Kids have their own opinions

https://www.newsweek.com/young-people-comfortable-lgbt-poll-1445435

FEWER MILLENNIALS

ACCEPTING OF LGBTQ

PEOPLE, STUDY FINDS

they won’t leave us the fuck alone

They’re looking at these people and thinking “get away from me, you fucking freak”.

h/t Anonymous Conservative

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7171195/Teenager-17-insisted-two-genders-suspended-school.html

The Left are anti-Darwin nutjobs.

https://www.datalounge.com/thread/24197185-poll-youth-increasingly-uncomfortable-with-lgbt-people-less-likely-to-be-allies-

I know two teen brothers (one is now 19 and the other 18) but I spoke to them about two years ago and they were both disgusted and honestly taken aback by what they saw at Pride in San Diego.

They were both open minded guys and very pro LGBT people. They don’t see why anyone should care what others are doing or who they love as long as it’s not hurting anyone. That was until they went to SD Pride to support as a 17 and 16 year old. They said they saw men with their cocks out in public while holding kids hands, guys rubbing each other off in front of kids, giving blow jobs in public or showing their holes etc. this blew their minds cause they thought this would just be LGBT people marching for their rights but they realized it’s just gay men being naked, being dirty and over sexual in public and intentionally showing as much skin as possible to people with kids etc. the older one was disgusted but didn’t let himself be too bothered but the younger one was truly bothered and after that said he would never go near a place like that and even started speaking against the “perverts” that are gays.

traumatic

and child abuse

He means it too. He doesn’t hold back either and doesn’t care who he offends now because truth is he comes from money. He’s from a line of successful Texans and they’re rich. He could care less anymore when a few years ago he was someone who always stood up for LGBT.

This is why I always speak AGAINST the way gays act at Pride. It TURNS PEOPLE OFF. You aren’t doing any good. But you all refuse to see this and label it homophobia. It isn’t. Being civilized isn’t homophobic.

https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/c4nu8b/pride_march/

Exhibit A in why Americans will shoot the Boomers.

comment

There’s too much of this at San Francisco Pride. These people shamelessly rub their dicks against people as they shove threw crowds. I usually leave once the BDSM people in their animal leather and latex gear show up in the parade. Why are they there? Keep that shit in the bedroom. It’s disturbing to look at and has nothing to do with LGBT pride.

Things like this suck, because I want to go to the parade. I like parades. But stuff like that just makes me want to avoid it like the plague.

Degenerates. The BDSM people are mostly either non-white or gay.

spot the r-type

Is this pride in SF? SF has a long history with public nudity and it’s kind of accepted as part of the city and festivities. Additionally “being naked around children in public” != “exposing yourself to children”. There’s not really a reason to hide casual, platonic nudity from children of any age. They’ve probably seen it before.

Now the naked guy that peed on me last year, I generally frown on that kind of nudity.

The public doesn’t consent to see nudity, ANY nudity.

Flashing is a fetish, they get a thrill out of forcing unwilling people to view them.

It’s a type of sexual sadism.

And literal truth

The addition of Trans and every other crazy after that is what is affecting gay rights. People can see the mental illness emanating from the alphabet soup. Two spirit ??? Gurl, you stole that from Native-American folk.

Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.

Pedos for “freedoms”

I want you to study this comment until you learn to spot the goalpost moving concern troll.

It really is about getting to your children first.

Leads with nationalism bashing. Typical.

“Muh Puritanism” = First World Standards, don’t let kids watch porn, that’s evil.

“A bodily function” apparently these people shit in the street, must be Chinese.

“Every living animal” attempt to normalise by comparing to lesser beasts, incapable of control.

“Performed” No, wrong. Plenty of animals don’t have sex, there are individual differences but note the sweeping statements. “Performed” is something porn addicts believe, incapable of intimacy.

“Be bad for children?” Playing dumb to the lifelong damage of child abuse including psychiatric outcomes like suicide. Yeah, guess those kiddies were ‘asking for it’, right, bitch? See, they know. That’s how pedos breed, the cycle of abuse.

“How are they expected to learn?” Rhetorical but when they’re adults, for starters. There’s nothing wrong with learning, with one person, and no age limit to start… creeps assume humans have expiration dates to normalise their fetish.

“Access information” Rape scenes, if taken as real ‘instruction’, are illegal in civilized society. This is how they think, they want this stuff to reach the kids first and get them hooked on the extremes, incapable of pair bonding (and leaving the sexual marketplace forever).

“Are we to produce” I smell pedo academia.

“18 year-old innocents” Innocence is neither a crime nor anything to be ashamed of, it’s a beautiful thing. Unless you’re a narcissist intent on destroying it. An 88 year-old innocent is also beautiful.

“Biological mature for five years” ah, the bleed/breed fetishists strike again

“Without any idea what to do” They are told the basics of human reproduction in biology, anything else is redundant. Schools are not churches intended to lecture in the finer points of brothel techniques.

“Natural equipment” Naturalistic fallacy but again, their ‘equipment’ (dehumanizing body parts) is none of your business, stop picturing kiddies.

“Directly instruct them” That isn’t a ‘lesson’, that’s rape. They lack neurobiological maturity to know what it means.

Misogynists prove themselves willing rapists when they claim women have the brains of children, but they still wanna fuck.

“Desperate” Projection.

“Ah, well” Crawl into a hole and die, perv.

“Learning how to reproduce” Tab A, Slot B does not require more than an hour’s biology class age 11/12. It’s Darwin. What you propose is brothel 101 e.g. blowjobs, not reproductive.

Sex does not exist for pleasure or exercise, it is babymaking. The postmodern are anti-Darwin.

“Quickly become extinct” Threat and attempted virtue signal. Actually, fornication without reproduction causes society to die out, see Calhoun’s rats and ‘liberal fertility’ rates.

Told you it was grooming.

Apparently “sensible attitudes” involves forcing sexuality on minors with state support.

Obscenity is real, privacy is important, rights end where other people begin.
There is no such thing as “sexual freedom” because that is entitlement, you are not entitled to use and abuse another’s body. This isn’t Brave New World. Children cannot consent and it is always assumed that consent is denied with any person, see how these ideas travel together? e.g. You ask someone on a date, assuming a no in the phrasing.
Pretty sure at this point all the female pedos got jobs in “Sex Ed”.

Why do female periods start earlier? Have you tried not grooming kids with telling them to masturbate?
If they had no urge, why tell them? It’s now commonplace to order them as homework. That is abuse.
You can tell when a creep writes a book because their victim ‘begs’ to be abused or like Lolita ‘leads them on’.
That is a MINOR. If you’re turned on, look away! The hypoagency of sexual predators (extreme r-types) is astounding in its arrogance.

A whore isn’t any less of a whore because a camera was present, arrest the entire ‘adult’ industry and you’ll be arresting most slave owners and handlers too.

Nobody is stopping you from exercising your imagination. However, predators wish to witness another’s humiliation. That’s the reason.

Arrests can’t happen yet due to corruption.

Blair was fined for cottaging. That’s just the start of it.

Jersey is dodgy. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ted-heath-allegations-jersey-victims-lawyer-says-linking-former-pm-to-child-sex-abuse-like-pinning-10440311.html

https://newspunch.com/shocking-list-of-mps-convicted-of-child-sex-offences/

The greatest line you’ll ever read:

He was photographed again by the media recently, engaged in some `man-on-man` action in a field off a motorway. “I was only looking for badgers” he said.

Distinguish Sex Ed from grooming

The new term for child grooming is Sex Ed, if you look into what they’re actively encouraging.

https://gab.ai/truthwhisper/posts/38494894

“A pamphlet/book called, ‘Happy, Healthy, and Hot’ pushed and endorsed by the United Nations says you DON’T have to tell potential sexual partners that you have HIV, in ‘It’s Perfectly Normal’, and the “It’s All One Curriculum’ that has and is being given out to tens of millions of children is recommended for kids under ten years old.

In these three pamphlets it shows graphic images of kids and adults masturbating,

Instruction manual

why do they need to know how to service an adult?

teaching five-year-olds that masturbation is not harmful,

tell that to A&E

porn really needs to be restricted completely from minors

it’s causing brain damage

gay sex, in the ‘It’s All One Curriculum’ they use the term “sexual pleasure” 62 times,

“consent” doesn’t make something moral and hedonism is mostly evil

I mean Satanism is just hedonism dressed up as a philosophy instead of being subhuman.

the term “abortion” is mentioned 112 times

get em while they’re young?

and it says “there is no right age to have sex.”

We need age of consent laws to be heavily enforced and set at age of majority, 18.

Classes now where nine-year-old little girls are taught how to put a condom on a plastic penis.”

The purpose of grooming is to shock and brainwash the child about what’s “normal” (said to be common) and implied to be expected of them, called gaslighting. This is how you’d raise a prostitute. Mental abuse and confusion forced about a range of depraved sexual acts people decades ago never heard of.

They’re raping the child’s innocence first. Rape as in to seize, this is abhorrent. We need shame in culture again. If you aren’t mature enough to have children, you shouldn’t be babymaking. This goes for the potential fathers too. Pregnancy is not a disease nor an accident, it’s the intended result of sexual activity.

Calling it “sleeping with” is another weasel term of theirs, call it baby-making because Darwin.

I saw one guy who was sleeping with a woman but too scared of the word “lover” to introduce her as such. He shouldn’t be so much as touching a woman with that immaturity. Take responsibility for your slutting, manwhores.

There’s no research into whether child masturbation is harmful (or not) but it probably is. Odds are it triggers premature puberty and that messes with the genetics’ signalling. Female menarche used to occur around age 17, 18. Premature anything is bad news for development.

You may remember abandoned children, m/f, hit puberty early and it does mess them up.

We really need to segregate schools by sex, mixed schools were a terrible idea.

I hope Trump makes it that parents can sue teachers, starting with the groomers.

The German Pedo Left rise again

It was often said on the slippery slope of Sex “Ed”: “Next they’ll be showing the kids porn and doing demonstrations.”

Here’s part 1

https://www.rt.com/news/429257-feminist-porn-germany-spd/

the 70s cults weren’t the end

Why and how would children consent, exactly?

Forcing the viewing of any explicit material is part of the grooming process of pedophiles.

Really it’s state grooming and child sexualisation/harassment.