“Right to decide” food label petitions

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300205
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300185

Ideally we need a petitions link page for important causes.

The wording is key on anything criminal though, any hint of miswording or spite and they’ll ignore it, however mundane the issue.

With these, I’d include a bit about the human right to control what one ingests and takes into one’s body as part of consent and the right to religion/belief under the Equality Act, including the right to information (prior to informed consent) and right to dissent from consumption, so labelling also helps with corporate transparency, which would boost faith and economic growth as more people feel confident to eat out without fear of breaching their “ethical stance” whether it be contrary religion or most directly, animal rights.

It’s fundamentally disrespectful to discounted religions and to animal rights activists, who naively trust that Trades Description applies to this, including restaurant items.

At the moment, corporations rob consumers of the executive “right to decide” what they put into their body.

Think about that.

“To make matters worse, the government does not force religiously slaughtered meat companies to so label this meat when it enters the general supply chain, due to higher costs.

They are trying to keep the costs down, however, that means that around 90% + of the UK population are subsidising meat that is not intended for them and which some people are forbidden to eat for religious reasons.”

Bullshit, a label costs NOTHING extra to add, labels are already printed.

It’s intentional deception of the public on a key ethical area of dietary consumption.

The majority of the country is Christian in the census and the Queen’s duty (and her Gov, that site) is to “protect the faith”. Can they protect our dinner plate?

https://www.fakeaddressgenerator.com/World/uk_address_generator

https://www.guerrillamail.com/

Someone link this on britpol for the bored.

https://temp-mail.org/en/

Being forced down our throats

Gore warning. Even Tufano’s a traitor. Pity, I could’ve found investors but Europe is rejecting halal bullshit. For obvious reasons. Funny couple of clips at end.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/857515/church-schools-serving-halal-meat-to-pupils-claim

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

For context.

Canteens in 27 Lancashire schools attended by 12,000 pupils are dishing up meat from animals not stunned before slaughter.

The list includes Church of England and Catholic schools, and the leader of Lancashire County Council has claimed parents are not being told what their children are eating.

Council chief Geoff Driver told The Times: “My suspicion is that some schools are simply just buying all halal meat because it’s the easiest thing to do.

Abdul Qureshi, LCM chairman, hit back by accusing Mr Driver of embarking on a “crusade” and said Muslims would boycott school meals if the council voted to ban non-stunned meat.

He said: “It will create huge agitation in society and we are already fighting against Islamophobia.”

He said “many, many Muslims” attended Lancashire’s Catholic and Church of England schools.

“Some of them are 50 per cent Muslim, some may be even more.”

Yeah, Muslims are attending Christian schools and trying to impose Muslim “law”.

This was 2017.

What about Christophobia? Why are they allowed to attend?

Lancashire County Council said the decision of what to serve pupils and how much to tell parents about it was made by each school. 

No it’s a consent issue. I’m sure the boards voting have a Common Purpose though.

2018:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.

Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.

Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”

It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.

Brought up because, 2019

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1167969/EU-news-Belgium-halal-kosher-ban-slaughter-religion-animal-welfare-latest-ecj

BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.

The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.

It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.

Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.

Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.

While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.

A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.

But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.

The freedom not to eat that shit?

Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.

He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.

Grounds for deportation.

“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”

Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.

Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.

Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.

That’s our birthright.

comment

If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .

I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.

aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that

It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.

They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,

Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.

You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.

Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.

High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians

It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good

Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.

They merely practice on non-human animals.

With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.

Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?

And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/26/21st-century-blood-libel/

His name literally sounded like libel.

“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”

same as Mary Kelly

An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.

from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4550817/was-hollywoods-worst-ever-murder-predicted-by-millionaire-killers-graphic-novel-featuring-a-female-character-being-brutally-murdered-and-drained-of-blood/

What does that look like?

Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.

From the recent murder:

Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.

Or chewed off.

According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.

“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.

“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”

The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.

Those are similar to Kelly.

So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.

comment from Express paper

One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.

They want to deceive.

For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!

The law is already there. They need a legal case.

A fine point here

Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?

Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.

Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection_in_the_United_Kingdom

https://www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/articles/2017/03/sale-of-goods-legislation-consumer-rights-act-guide-for-small-businesses/

“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.

Under the legislation, the products you sell must:

  • be of a satisfactory quality
  • be fit for purpose
  • match the description
  • be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”

Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.

There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.

comment

if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.

The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.

The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.

Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.

from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27324224 :

“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”

“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”

“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.

Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.

They’ve lost clean half their pricing.

“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.

Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.

Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”

How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?

“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.

Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”

Not our God. Who is we?

“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”

False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).

The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.

Slight detour but relevant. #######

Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-45056780

“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”

“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”

Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.

“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”

They’re going to over-ride the families with it.

“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?

“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”

Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.

Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you. Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).

What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?

“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.

Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.

We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.

#######

Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.

From above:

“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”

Latest was done almost ten years ago.

“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”

THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.

Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.

Halal video.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=545_1345800806

Five minutes but grisly.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=EsCJ_1566751879

Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.

On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’

Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.

Have an opinion until you can’t.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=44b_1487932189

Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.

As far from clean as possible.

Click to access veterinary-concerns.pdf

The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest.
The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain
present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.

….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost
less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.

aka the more European way

The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.

And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.

Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare
concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter
(Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the
stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway
irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do
not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).

Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1
and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed
to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning
the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous
struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were
thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response
to the cut.

Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.

Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.

The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.

Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.

Less suffering huh?

Liars.

Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.

https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2016/04/11/GUEST-ARTICLE-US-halal-food-regulations-Are-you-up-to-speed

“Multiple states have enacted statutes in recent years to regulate the halal food industry and to prevent mislabeling and deceptive practices”.

Deceptive practices, huh?

Yeah, those are awful.

https://frankiesfreerangemeat.com/pages/about-us

“Integrity and Accountability”

“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”

“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”

Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.

Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”

As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.

Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.

NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”

You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?

“Slaughter by a Muslim”

So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.

When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.

The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita
and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.

The one cut propaganda is a LIE.

In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle

either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.

Up to 60.

Religion of cruelty.

For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound,
additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut
the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).

As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?

Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been
described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed
quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious
sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and
animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves
by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the
first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious
stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the
incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning
(Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as
painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results
demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck
tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the
physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non
stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.

Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be
able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.

A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.

Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.

Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.

Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury
occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

It’s evil.

During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut
as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling
or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without
stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as

struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction
movements and wing flapping.

You can’t pretend it’s better.

In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the
throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using
behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in
all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of
duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.

Cut, singular? Up to sixty!

Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of
direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut),
insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade,
increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of
the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.

Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?

Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.

It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance

I’ll stop here, you get the gist.

I’m too disgusted.

some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.

“happy”? lying or deceiving?

Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.

I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.

Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.

You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,

Shills, shills everywhere.

They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.

Bernie supporters ree

The bootstraps approach only works if there aren’t invaders taking up jobs and houses.

Why houses?

Between half and two-thirds of Millennial income goes on rent. Monthly.

They work multiple jobs, more hours than Boomers at that age.

Generation Rent or Generation Serf?

At this point the history books could call it financial terrorism since they’re barraging the young whites from all sides. Happy to help the diseased barbarians at the Cali gates but refuse to help their own kids/grandkids. A nation of perverts, pathological altruism is sick.

Reducing that expense alone would save the economy and native birth rate. This is why Gen Y seems creepily obsessed with ‘getting on the housing ladder’.

They know it’s over-valued but how much is an escape ladder worth when drowning?

The word Bernie refuses to use is Rent Control. That’s how you get ’em to shoot one another. Make the socialists target the things actually indebting them on a monthly basis. The Boomers of the Guardian won’t allow it, exposing both to the truth.

Know thy enemy. Housing value is tied to many things, mostly “crime”.

Boomers are finding properties hard to sell all of a sudden due to foreigners moving in or being moved in.

Their gated communities plan is drowning like an island in a tsunami of third world rat families packed to the rafters.

There are billions of them.

BILLIONS.

Remind Boomer lefties of this and the never-ending flow of African demographics (posted about here) because they donated thousands over the years since the 80s to help those people breed while refusing their own children help to start families.

And they have the nerve to complain they’re not getting grandkids?

All that virtue signalling Third World charity money in a savings account for decades would’ve helped. Calculate it.

It’s the little things, small decisions easy to spot.

Yum foods brand is generally going under because the working class resent their charity efforts to Africa – who don’t need our help (and never deserved it). Yum is actually Asian and so exploiting the Africans to take their own money back – how ‘kind’. Places like KFC have gone downhill too since they’ve been catering to child rapists (along with many candy makers). There’s a boycott of halal, for cruelty reasons too.

Christians refuse to eat religious sacrifice from another religion. The high street brands who used it have been withering, Muslims mostly eat at home. Plus, corporate favoritism of one religion is actively anti-white, having seen demographics.

A halal list of boycott companies passed around atheists and Christians would shit them up suitably. Simply writing to them and asking would get them to fall over themselves to admit it.

The atheists and vegans say nothing about clear religious labelling, because they’re really misotheists and anti-Christian. The state is actively funding religion by enabling this. Schools and prisons force the poor against their religious rights to eat this immoral shit. I don’t even think a Parliament petition would work, though it’s worth a try.

https://www.change.org/p/uk-government-make-it-compulsory-for-supermarkets-stores-to-clearly-label-halal-meat

Like this but Parliament. We have religious freedom as consumers to avoid it.

“Halal and other meat which has been ritually slaughtered in the UK (either by pre-stunning or non-stun) is not clearly labelled in supermarkets and stores across much of the country. This means that without knowing it, British people may have consumed Halal meat. Consumers deserve to know what they’re buying and should be granted the opportunity to make more informed choices.”

They should sue.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions?page=1&q=halal&state=all

Oddly, they keep getting closed.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/242484

There’s a 6 month limit.

Maybe Breitbart London needs to be roped into this, they’ve come good on petitions before.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/233043

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/240715

It is extremely important that we should all have an honest choice, be fully aware of what we are buying, confident that we are informed of ingredients and should be aware if a product is halal certified as many people with other religions besides Islam are forbidden halal certified products.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/235994

Insufficient stunning doesn’t scientifically count.

Food Labelling Regulations 1996 require information to be given on all pre-packed foods, so informed choices can be made. 
It’s strictly forbidden for some Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists & Christians to consume anything associated with Ritual Slaughter [RS] or a Religious Standard [RS]. Please Label ‘RS’

They literally pray over it.

Why isn’t there an additional tax for charities that help other nations? That would make sense, that’s why. Charity begins at home.

The chickens are roosting. Only self-interest (losing their ‘investment’ in a house, their ‘retirement’) will redpill the Boomer Left hard enough to oppose multiculturalism.

There are BILLIONS of them, and one of you (and your nest egg with a door).

The gumball video of immigration is useful here.

Demand is propped up by the artificial eternal flow of boat people (funded by Gov, bribed) and visa workers, plus dopey Chinks who think our worthless real estate has value because Muh Queen.

Yeah, we’re all queuing up to buy a prestigious apartment in Scunthorpe!

I can’t blame the Boomers for the last one since we’ll just buy it back After. With the age-based theft, some evening out is moral.

So it’s imported voters shipped in to vote traitor (they’re given UBI from white taxes, have been for decades – via the artificial hyperinflated valuation of local councils on their place) and the foreign renters with rich parents in Spain, France, Greece etc. letting them larp over London at a busywork shitty job like “Marketing” or “Tourism”.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/16/footballer-carjacking-attempt-reveals-threat-to-londons-super-rich

In areas like Hampstead Garden Suburb, home to high net worth individuals and a cohort of footballers including Özil, the security gates are getting higher and private security firms busier amid heightened security concerns, fuelled by a spate of sometimes violent home invasions and vehicle-enabled ram raids. Wealthy visitors to the city are also taking measures.

Both equally straining the system. Including one another. 

“What tends to happen is that a home might be demolished and when it gets rebuilt again there might be a large security gate. It obviously looks different from the older homes,” he added, gesturing to one side at an older, open-fronted, red-brick home and then to the other side, where major construction works were shrouded by metal hoarding.

Homogeneous high trust culture v multiculturalism low trust, in a meme.

it hasn’t stopped thieves in other locations from using four-wheel drives to knock down gates

the low IQ have Looney Tunes logic

why are security guards allowed to be armed but not property owners?

and break into homes, often in the full knowledge that they may be occupied.”

Ram-raided by diversity, couldn’t happen to nicer con artists.

Like the Kool Aid mascot, here comes your enrichment!

Muh but move somewhere cheaper!

Like Venezuela?

Or by cheaper, do you mean browner? Such a male privilege thing to say! 😛 How much would you pay per month not to get raped? That’s over half the millennial demographic’s problem and we all know it. “Safe” is the code for it.

It’s a systemic problem. If you move out to the Styx, there are no jobs because the bootstrap people moved them to Asia.

Betrayal. You have to understand the maths of the socialists and how their heads are turned to distractions with false premises – like the tax muh rich but not jews contradiction. Hitler stripped the rich jews of their shit before calling for them to leave. They had a place to go – Judea. They refused.

Similar setup now.

Re-read Kipling’s poem, you don’t get to order around the natives. Superior in body or number doesn’t matter, they’ll win. If the Jews scared of Muslims in London were really scared, they wouldn’t have created all the conditions to import them and 2. rip up their stashed dual passport with Israel.

If you want London sorted out, outlaw dual passports, there’s no other way and anyway, because there’s no legal reason for them. A house divided. This is the only investment that matters. If they can’t run, things will get shaped up sharpish. The enemy of my enemy can be bloody useful.

Match their tactics to destroy us with a Christian V Muslim war, simply by salvaging the capital.

I don’t have to morally or technically agree with the Hitler comparison to understand these facts.

Accept it or get nowhere. Keep headbutting the brick wall of reality.

A petition about dual passports could also clarify their legal purpose as documents of military draft options.

A lot of men would be very interested to know this. Surprised MGTOW haven’t already done it. At least a freedom of information request on what the passport entitles the military to do with the holder.

sample questions, written up formally:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/hm_passport_office

  1. Are passports a military document?
  2. Does the signee enter a covenant with the sovereign military?
  3. Is the military entitled to any rights over the passport holder?
  4. Does the holding of a passport pertain to any hypothetical draft rights of the nation dispensing?
  5. If so, how?
  6. What then, is the military purpose of a passport, if any?
  7. Further, why were they introduced for abroad travel during wartime?

Nothing.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/hm_passport_office?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=draft+military&request_date_after=&request_date_before=&commit=Search

C O I N C I D E N C E

Guys, one of you please put these questions to them.

About halal:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/229231

“considering” consumer rights?

“considering”

There are no domestic or European Regulations that require the labelling of Halal or Kosher meat, but where any information of this nature is provided, it must be accurate and must not be misleading to the consumer.

What a coincidence.

The Government is aware that there is public concern about meat from animals being slaughtered in accordance with religious beliefs being sold to consumers who do not require their meat to be prepared in this way and that there are calls for such meat to be labelled. The Government is considering labelling in the context of the UK leaving the EU.

to avoid issues with consent, duh

one lawsuit would settle this, one

get a Sikh or Buddhist

EU exit can bring opportunities for food labelling to improve transparency for consumers and the world-wide reputation of UK food. We are ambitious in wanting what is best for UK consumers and for UK businesses, both selling on the UK market and on important EU and wider markets worldwide.

translation: we think they can give us more tax money, you have no liberty to avoid this

reality: no, they have 24/7 home cooking, they’re not eating out enough to justify the abuse of human rights (freedom of religion) financially

Vegan propaganda

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/nov/01/third-of-britons-have-stopped-or-reduced-meat-eating-vegan-vegetarian-report

Note the link says one third that magically disappears.

Fake news, people who can afford to go to Waitrose are going to boutique butchers.

One in eight”

POOF! GONE!

“Britons is now vegetarian or vegan, according to a new report on food shopping that underlines a revolution in the UK’s eating habits.”
Invest in healthcare, there’s a boom in medical conditions on the horizon.

https://www.aarp.org/health/brain-health/info-10-2011/b12-level-affects-brain-size-health-discovery.html

Veganism: The brain aging diet?

Vegetarian and vegan are totally different diets, stop conflating them, the false equivalence gives me a Vitamin B12 deficiency brain shrinkage headache.

There’s also the blatantly obvious fact that more plants increases pesticide ingestion. Organic plants still contain a lot of pesticide, increasing intake substantially (% of diet) will steamroll omnivore consumption.

Plus the animal and bug murder of ‘pest control’.

https://www.quora.com/If-farmers-use-pesticides-to-kill-pests-doesnt-that-make-their-produce-not-vegan

A five year-old could understand that making food involves killing things, that also want to eat your food. Biological competition?

Here’s where they sneak in the propaganda:

A series of influential reports have said that avoiding meat and dairy products is the single biggest way consumers can reduce their environmental impact on the planet, because farming animals is such a CO2-intensive process.”

So is the article about a Waitrose survey or mysterious, unlinked (!) reports?

“Nick Palmer, the head of Compassion in World Farming UK says “Science proves that the healthiest diet is one that is plant-heavy. By eating less meat, fish, eggs and dairy

most food, then

and choosing higher welfare when we do, we can all help animals, people and the planet.””

Science proves no, it doesn’t.

Source? There are certainly no solid studies like that on vegans. We’ve been looking but all they hand us is hand-waving conjecture and reddit-tier self-report. Scientism promotes the high-fructose diet of veganism and their skin shows it.

Also, people are animals. If you really wanted to help the planet, you’d commit suicide. Total extinction of your carbon footprint, as a carbon-based life form.

The Waitrose info seems to confirm it’s a static fad, as in, no new people are taking it up.

Is that it? Also now it’s 1 in 5.

“Publication of the findings represents awkward timing for Waitrose.” PR. Fake news. A term banned in the press here now.
Faking data for the public should be illegal, especially when these people are dispensing medical advice.

Back to pure, organic bullshit:
“The number of vegans in the UK, who shun all animal products including dairy and eggs, has grown fourfold in the past four years from 150,000 to 600,000,”

Wait for it.

“…according to the Vegan Society.”
Would they lie to us? And that isn’t very encouraging considering rising obesity levels, what % of vegetarians and what % of vegans are overweight at all?

Look at the Waitrose data. There are tiny percentages involved.
For <50s, the number is static between age ranges. There is no movement.

The lines added represent the mean for almost all age groups, and it wobbles within 1-2%, nothing!

“Waitrose was the first UK supermarket to install dedicated vegan sections in 134 of its stores in May.”

Ah, this is an advert.

What’s the difference between a cucumber and a vegan cucumber?

What you do with it.

That justifies the price hike.

“This year, we’ve seen vegan food go mainstream” said Natalie Mitchell.

No, it isn’t, the rate of uptake isn’t higher with people under 30 or even 20.

If you’re gonna lie with statistics, get good with it?

“people are discovering that it tastes amazing.”

reconcile with

“Many of the vegan and vegetarian respondents said they missed bacon sandwiches and pork scratchings.”

“About 60% of vegans and 40% of vegetarians surveyed said they had adopted the lifestyle over the past five years, with 55% citing animal welfare concerns, 45% health reasons and 38% environmental issues.”

So what? Relevance? Make a different article proving that.

They don’t want to label halal meat, let alone ban its inhumane production in this country. They don’t care about the animals. Whatsoever.

There are no good studies I’ve seen on veganism altogether and vegetarian studies are fraught with method errors then environment – well, most new meat demand comes from China so you’re barking up the wrong tree. And their demand is only rising with their population boom.

https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Regions/Asia/China
https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm

Behold! Real DATA!

That is not your imagination, Israel consumes BY FAR the most meat in the world (poultry value cinches it).

When are you shaming them, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Peru?

Are the Guardian calling on the UK government to reduce production in this country of Halal and Kosher meat (insufficiently or not at all stunned, torturing the animal?) and to stop selling it abroad, increasing cruel meat demand? No? Then they don’t care about the animals.

“Scientific research published this year found that without meat and dairy consumption, global farmland use could be reduced by more than 75% – an area equivalent to the US, China, the EU and Australia combined – and still feed the world.”

So who eats the most meat? Clue – not white people! Are we all meant to go on rations (worse than rations, majority food group eradication) for the supposed benefit of other people in the world who don’t?
Shaming people for eating, they’re totally serious.

Detour:

BCD – children deserve to develop properly and adults require adequate nutrition for fertility, especially women. I’m shocked the feminists are too dense to twig that shaming dairy is heavily sexist against women.

Before someone who can’t google gets triggered at the word ‘sexist’…

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070228064902.htm
“Researchers in the United States have found a link between a low-fat dairy diet and increased risk of anovulatory infertility.” For one study.

There is definitely a link between veganism (worse, no dairy) and female infertility which remains unexplored.

“In the drinks aisle, Waitrose singles out the popularity of organic wine.”

Alcohol is proven to permanently damage your DNA. Health reasons, huh? Not signalling?

Wine doesn’t have mental benefits over beer, either. It’s false stereotype.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/10/13/iq-and-alcohol-choices/

“Waitrose’s managing director, Rob Collins, said: “Being mindful of how we live and eat has become a priority in today’s world. As we become increasingly mindful of our own health, the wellbeing of our family and that of the planet, we’re reshaping how we shop, cook and eat.””

Read: consume less food so your betters can consume more, for the good of socialist globalism.

It won’t make you stupider, that’s impossible….

https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/99legacy/6-14-1999a.html
“It was this new meat diet, full of densely-packed nutrients, that provided the catalyst for human evolution, particularly the growth of the brain…”

Fun fact: A lot of Hollywood goes vegan because it allows their body to handle more drug abuse.

https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/zmzjnw/is-cocaine-vegan-it-depends-on-who-you-ask

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/03/13/174205188/is-your-medicine-vegan-probably-not
“Is Your Medicine Vegan? Probably Not”

The Darwin Awards need a Vegan section.

http://www.veganfitness.net/viewtopic.php?t=271

“Some people avoid products that are tested on or derived from animals, but don’t feel drug-use, smoking, and the like are directly related to the issue of animal cruelty.”

http://gawker.com/5905479/woman-dies-of-starvation-while-on-an-all-sunlight-diet

Here’s an illustration of the issue I take with surveys on diet.

I hand-typed this.

https://www.vegsoc.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=753
Vegetarian Society:

2007 – 3618 adults
2009 – 3219 adults
2010 – 548 adults
2011 – 1031 adults
2012 – 1491 adults surveyed.

2007 – 3% vegetarian (more female), 2% vegan (more men).
2009 – 3% vegetarian, 5% partially (WTF is that? That’s normal).
2010 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2011 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2012 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.

Reconcile with

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/news/number-of-vegans-in-britain-rises-by-360-in-10-years/

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/apr/01/vegans-are-coming-millennials-health-climate-change-animal-welfare

Opposite politics, reporting the same shoddy “data”.
Thinks that make you go Hmmmmm….

What propaganda? Fake news is banned.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181023/19301840900/uk-government-screws-head-straight-bans-use-term-fake-news-govt-officials.shtml

You don’t need a phrase like that.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/440783/proportion-of-vegetarians-in-the-united-kingdom/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/562911/global-sales-growth-of-the-vegan-market-by-country/

“As of 2016, Asia Pacific held the largest share of vegan consumers globally, with approximately nine percent of people following a vegan diet in this area.”

A rabbit party doesn’t stop, it is stopped

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/cologne-attacks-trigger-raw-debate-on-immigration-in-germany-a-1071175.html

comeback required kilgrave

K.

 

On the topic, I’ve seen a convergence of two topics: refugee meals/cuisine and feast/famine in epidemiology.

Perhaps you should take a peek at this.

http://journals.lww.com/epidem/Fulltext/2007/09001/The_Effect_of_Vegetarian_Diet_on_Immune_Response.649.aspx

It’s entirely predictable if you know anything about the immune system.

That’s why they push for Halal, fyi. Free meat while the natives weaken themselves.

How to spot a traitor: Calais Edition

I refused to believe this until I saw it. Well, I saw it.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/CalaisMigrantSolidarityActionFromUK

As if there aren’t any poor, homeless or suffering people in your own bloody country.

fury anger hades

outgroupcharitycases

Meanwhile, there are still homeless people in Europe, actual homeless people, who aren’t there by choice. For one anecdote, I know people who could barely get by this Christmas, even on food. Within the UK. A First World country.

Before you ascribe pure motives to these people, click on the tab labelled Files.

calaislegal

oh damn wow ah

That alone would be rather damning, but it’s Christmas, so I’ll give you more.

This group is a place to organise aid from the UK to those stranded in Calais. You can find your local group here :
https://goo.gl/kwkQ7y

The FAQ sheet:
https://goo.gl/78MJGe

Don’t post photos of individuals without their permission, and don’t post photos of dead people.

Ashamed of something?
It’s a public group. You put your name to it. It’s public charity work. Legally, it’s all legit.

Let’s look for a typical picture of these model citizens.

frumpyrtypes

That’s… exactly what I expected. Frumpy ugly people who look like a sack of potatoes in hideous jumpers. The theory of Lefty ugliness and overcompensation holds.

We decline all responsibility in terms of safety, communication, organisation, logistics and donations for any project. This is JUST a Facebook group.

Facebook groups don’t dole out legal advice and pressure the taxpayer via Government.

Don’t take my word for it, read their holy pinned post and make up your own mind which nation they are serving.

calaispinnedpost1 calaispinnedpost2

Well, if it were a harmless little group online, innocuous enough to make completely public information (yes, that’s how it works), you have revoked your right to privacy. Which means I can point out that under members, there is a tab called Admin. Note: how few of them want to be outed with that disgustingly garish orange badge.

calaisadmin1 calaisadmin2

After all, if you’re doing this doubleplusgood work, you should be proud of it, and should take no issue with getting the full credit, right?

It isn’t as if your direct actions could lead to something terrible, like another terrorist attack, is it? It isn’t as if the UK is currently on a high alert level? The threat has nothing to do with you, I’m sure…

And they made the papers.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/629323/Christmas-Calais-dinner-Jamie-Oliver-chef-10-tonnes-presents

No, that isn’t a typo. 10 tonnes of presents to outgroup people with the excess money to travel past plenty of safe countries and a chef-cooked halal Christmas meal.
They don’t understand, when they resist, and everyone hits their limit eventually, these people will attack them. It’s happening all over the place. Even SWEDEN. That’s why various parts of Europe are closing their borders. Protection.

33,180 members in this one pocket alone. Affiliated with Left Wing and Proud. Quelle surprise.

Well it looks like they’ve made our list for us. In case we need to contact them, after an event.

I can’t wait to see what their charges are going to do, because we can all agree, in taking responsibility for these people, they are directly responsible for their later actions.

OK? O.K.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Everyone complaining about Halal meat in the UK

what did you expect? Really?
The purpose of religion is conversion.

High time preference people need to go away and leave us in peace

Some people are only starting to care about religious intrusion now it’s taking their bacon away at Subway.
Better late than never I suppose.
No mention of Kosher, which is equally vile and cruel.
The biggest problem with both is the issue no one will discuss: it’s religious SACRIFICE.
You’re eating a ritual sacrifice. If you’re not that religion, that’s a problem.