Hookers always like sexual interest

Most women don’t.

That’s normal. We aren’t wired that way. It’s funny how the same men saying “sex differences!” until the cows come home then try and hold women to hyper-masculine standards (porn addict) of sexuality and game-ness. It’s chemically impossible, you’d need to find a tranny for that, someone medically male.

Plenty of healthy women just feel awkward when speaking to a stranger on any condition, let alone one who clearly doesn’t care about your rights (including to be left alone), who you are and just wants the dreaded One Thing.

This person is nobody and nothing (to us), yet the entitlement prevails.

It’s this entitlement, bolstered by power over the target or not, that everyone is objecting to. It’s so simple a child could understand. Other people’s bodies do not belong to you. You don’t get to touch them. That’s it.

It isn’t friendly, friends aren’t physically tactile.

I come from a country where people rehearse what they’ll say on the phone to the bank and talk about the weather with an over-friendly cashier just to get through it. This is normal, strangers shouldn’t be too agreeable with each other, that’s an r-selected trait to love ‘meeting’ new people and very dangerous for the person.

Most of us have our head screwed on straighter. We can’t win, we try to minimize the risk of being a victim (it’s never zero, for anyone) and we’re still insulted by people who think their desires over-ride your rights. Here in Britain we just think – ugh, rude. It’s typical American crassness. You just don’t comment on a person’s physical appearance until you’re very close friends, sometimes not even then.

Americans keep expecting everyone should be as gregarious as a playboy bunny at a sex convention. 1. Fuck you, America. 2. That’s never, ever going to happen.

Sexual attention is an insult, to most people, in most of the world.
It insinuates they’d be low enough to accept advances.

A basic right is to be respected, shown by leaving them alone. Property rights start with the body. This isn’t Eve Teasing, you aren’t a child touching a bauble because you like the look of it. More adults need to exercise impulse control. Men used to be pioneers at self-control, and now look what porn has done to you, absolutely ruined.

You see, porn has absolutely brainwashed men in one way clearly – porn stars can never say no.

Bear in mind, they must be paid to surrender that right, with contracts and terms.

Healthy women are shy and retiring, in general. This is a good thing, a social good, and one of those things the stupid men complaining about MeToo are completely missing – feminine women don’t like being stalked. They should feel safer, at work or walking down the street, like a man shouldn’t be followed by a gang down an alley.

The broken ones are saying things like

Millet, 69, whose bestselling 2002 memoir The Sexual Life of Catherine Mdetailed how she “loves to suck men’s cocks” and enjoyed taking it in every orifice during orgies involving up to 150 people, had previously and reliably provoked the nation last month when she said she “really regretted not having been raped because I could have shown that you get over it.”

Serious question: is it possible to rape someone who never says No?


Men need to stop assuming any woman is ‘up for it’ – look at the stats, sluts are a minority. It is offensive because we have reputation laws too. When do we bring back the gigantic hat pins to stab these bastards?
Sure, I propose we give women guns and a right to defend themselves.

Newspapers across the country began reporting similar encounters with “mashers,” period slang for lecherous or predatory men (defined more delicately in Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie as “one whose dress or manners are calculated to elicit the admiration of susceptible young women”). A New York City housewife fended off a man who brushed up against her

a fetish called frottage

on a crowded Columbus Avenue streetcar and asked if he might “see her home.” A Chicago showgirl, bothered by a masher’s “insulting questions,” beat him in the face with her umbrella until he staggered away.

My hero.

Yes, give everyone a right to defend themselves. See what happens.

Legalize pepper spray at least. Any man who complains is obviously a sex pest.

Conflating verbal abuse with chatting is like confusing using a knife on a roast dinner with serial killing, it’s a blatant false equivalence and justifies the abusers, who always pretend to be rainbows and pure intentions. We have just as much sympathy for male victims but you’ll notice, like most sexual crimes, the perps tend to be male (there’s your red pill, shove it) and since most men are statistically straight, most victims of predators are female. That still isn’t the woman’s fault, stop blaming Mommy.

Nobody is questioning the male on male homicide data so denialism of harassment is backward.

We’re the first generation to try and do it. Slutty people (r-types) have a pathologically aggressive response to being told No, it’s their damage (hypofrontality). Like a toddler, narcissistic rage tends to get them what they want, if society permits it. Society has done nothing for too long, else Rotherham and the like would never have happened. Society must either shame this (now un-PC to shame anything) unhealthy hypersexuality or ban certain behaviours (as they used to be, pre-Sexual Revolution) like the bobby chasing down a ruffian with his baton for shouting at (cat-calling) ladies on bikes; one time, one of them beat the guy who wouldn’t stop pawing at her with an umbrella, I read (this was considered self-defense, and defending her own honour). Update: not the one I linked to. Honour-defending is coming back in, like it or not, especially online. Those are the only options and you brought it on yourselves, these aggressive child-like people can’t be trusted to socialize like responsible adults. You shouldn’t be forced to chase down strangers in the street, you aren’t invited to the same social gatherings because you can’t compete in their league, just accept it and know your place. There’s a clear class thing going on here too. Nobody talks about it.

Without religion, there’s no public etiquette enforceable anymore and until we can go back to shaming and stigmatizing antisocial people, there will be more public scrutiny and hashtags. For civil balance, there has to be, else there will be more unrest.

Shame on you, CD. Most women are not prostitutes like you.

If a man won’t take disinterest as final, we have laws written up on this for a reason. They’re closely related to begging laws,also a crime. You have a right to be left alone and respected in your space, in public. That is a human right.

I will point out white countries never had this pervasive harassment problem until we imported various non-whites who think you’re the rude one for not responding to their holler asking what dat mouth do.

Sort that out if you want women to dress nicer as a group, right now we’re trying to minimize ourselves as a target overall, with androgyny. It’s like Clark Kent’s glasses, which we also nicked.

A person who might pen you in or hit you for ignoring them (there are videos online) has no place in the First World. Savages cannot be civilized.

How women feel being chatted up

Picture the bus or train creep.

They act like you engaged them in a conversation. That, or you owe them in their mind because forming a sentence is the new standard of bravery for numales. 0-60 or you’re a “bitch”, or, ironically a “whore”, which is who they should be soliciting for that. (Why don’t women like modern men? Maybe because you won’t stop insulting us for having human boundaries?)
Like a dog with a chew toy, they refuse to let you politely leave.
Nothing is more inane than how much they supposedly lift, how much they supposedly make, how good a ____ they supposedly are…


This applies even if we fancy you at first. The interest level drops. Modern men are more vapid than the average woman in any previous time period. We’re instinctively repulsed by this. Men needed courting so we could slowly care about your bullshit.
What do you think the common whine ‘but he’s different!’ is referring to?

You’re insulting us. We aren’t shallow. You clearly are (with men, it’s science and porn doesn’t help). You get rejected. You call us shallow, despite turning down someone superficially a good catch. You brought it up?

Do you cuss out companies if they don’t select you for a job?

No, that would be stupid. Women talk, so this isn’t any less stupid.

Related to the deceptive guy who claims to be friendzoned (you said you just wanted to be friends, you said you didn’t want to date, you invited hang-outs…) mixed messages weirdos, becoming an ogre that totally justifies your rapedar instinct in .5 milliseconds – you were never in the running because women cannot think with a penis we do not have

At least they can’t complain of something else like strangerzoned. Entitled prissy bitches. It has never been socially acceptable to solicit people in the street. You aren’t arrested, that doesn’t make it normal or acceptable. You’re signalling that you lack social connections or skills to get any woman to pay social attention to you without chasing her. Literally, physically stalking her down a street and yes, it is stalking. At most, they offer you their number, you don’t have to ask. This is how socializing works and you don’t automatically assume it’s a sexual thing. Not everyone is desperate or looking.


this, the apex of the loser pyramid

No means no but no also means fuck off when you have to repeat it.

You can’t change it. It’s biologically impossible. In thinking you can change it, there’s something wrong with you or you’re a rapist who doesn’t actually care what the lady thinks.


We have a phrase “…who are you?” trans. for Americans: you are nothing to me, leave me alone.

It’s the original stay in your lane. Bosses use it too, it isn’t sexual. It can also mean stop talking if a person must be in a meeting room. It works by the power of awkward silence and body language, like …women.

Then after intruding on personal space in public (every society has rules), being rude repeatedly and trying to force interactions (up to physical contact, unwanted, unsolicited, technically illegal*), you present us with a choice to accept this hostile takeover bid or reject you.

Yes, I wonder why the rejection rate for cold approaches is almost 100%.

It’s a mystery for all of time.

I have witnessed women troll men who come up to them. Wastehistime was a response to wastehertime, if you look it up. As in, if you want to play emotional head games, women will win. I don’t advocate talking to anyone this desperate because as well as verbal hostility (ugly) they are probably literally violent.

Ask yourself, since male upper body strength is twice that of women, approximately the same divide as regular men to NFL players;

Why should we have to let down gently an entitled stranger who wasn’t smacked as a child?

…Exactly, they’re not our problem. We escape the situation.

The men complaining about women who complain about harassment is like playing spot the vegan but reducing your rape odds. They could go to a gay bar for a month and report on what it’s like…..? They never do.

What to do?

Don’t approach strangers randomly. We can see the stink lines of desperation. We’re embarrassed for you. Think: do they talk to me like a child? Well, you don’t know this is something humans don’t do. So yeah. Valid.

*you can’t just go up grabbing people, that’s assault
if it’s only friendly, you’d do it with men as often

You want a connection, expand your friend groups. Yes, hard work, like all relationships. This also controls for people on your own level who will respond to you.


Bitch is now a compliment solely because these losers have changed the accepted definition of it.

Video: Aziz the Creep

Your skin colour isn’t a pass on abuse of power.

He’s always been a two-faced creep, like most male feminists, and especially those who aren’t white, but spend all their time bashing white men. It’s so you abandon the men and he can predate on you.

Yes, shephard, leave your flock. They don’t deserve you, they’re independent and responsible for any situation they’re in. This type also lie about what a situation is until you get there, common in Hollywood. Whatever happens, they can play the Psychic Card i.e. you should’ve known what the situation is without me asking you.

Victim blaming, you’ll notice. Offers don’t work like that.

You don’t go on a date unless consent is given, that’s kidnapping, so how does less consent go here?

If men want us to trust them, they can’t call us stupid when that backfires.

He was bitching Jennifer Lawrence ignored him and his texts (asking her out) and the public pressure from his status made her cave and appear with him in public but she friendzoned him like he deserves. He still attention-seeks with her like a puppet. Stay in your lane, grossboy.

How long until James Cameron or Steven Spielberg? Are they too big?


Alcoholism doesn’t > pedophilia


“We will be happy to perform our play in its entirety on stage at the Old Vic.”

Loved the Shakespeare. I must speak.

I love how they’re trying to contain it to Hollywood.
On the other hand, I love TayTay’s replica theory video more than anyone.
Silicon Valley? Banking/Finance? Modelling? How low can you go?

This is one of many – predators – and industries.

It’s disturbing they, the lay public, seem to care more when men were the victims than the army of Weinstein victims. I hope it’s because of the minor element but most predators, even hetero, have a flexible view of consent.

I thought you’d like my thoughts before I go suspiciously quiet again.
All this work makes me hungry, I forget where I hide my snacks like a god damn squirrel.

Be professional at work, we’re all human. You can be a dick on your private time.

Clue: a rule among many Hollywood couples is “Gay doesn’t count.”

“Why don’t women defend themselves?”

Well, in most countries you banned guns and even most knives.
Considering we have half the upper body strength at best, we’re going to need something extra.

Then there’s hatpin panic.

At the time, men carried around swords, knives, batons, daggers and drugs.
Fair fighters.

“violent assaults” that’s legally called self defense, m8

And without a flash of leg, breast or arm in sight, they still tried the ‘be less attractive’ tactic. Extraordinary. Well, with growing obesity rates, I guess women finally listened. Men are never happy.

If women get raped in countries that dress in hijab, I don’t think it’s really what she’s wearing rather than being guilty of Possession of Vagene.

Lust is no reason to attack anyone. The law used to reflect this better.

And if it isn’t sexual, or intended, abusively, to humiliate (sadism) then I would pay a small gang of raging poofs to follow that same man around for days doing exactly the same things.

You should be flattered! It’s a compliment! It’s a joke!

It’s like if a man gets kicked in the balls.

What were you wearing? Did you provoke them?

Well, maybe you should’ve been wearing a cup, you were basically asking for it!

Ask rapists not to rape? Ask ball-kickers not to kick!

Except even that doesn’t work because no bra – your nipples were showing, bra – too perky, self-control of a baby.
They say women complain about men but men always blame us for their lust. …It’s literally in your head, don’t be hysterical. Isn’t it special snowflake to ask an entire sex to un-develop their secondary characteristics because you refuse to stop looking?

I find it amazing men walk around topless and somehow women have the masculine reserve not to grope their tits.
It’s almost like desires don’t trepass on rights, autonomy is a human fact and any form of physical entitlement is repulsive (money, body, attention).

Cate Blanchett, goddess of style


I just love her so much.

“For me, the true icons of style are always those women who’ve been utterly themselves without apology, whose physical presence and their aesthetic is really integrated in a non self-conscious way into part of who they are, and women who know how they look is not all of who they are, but just an extension of that. It’s about women who feel free to wear what they want when they want and how they want to wear it. We all like looking sexy, but it doesn’t mean we want to f*ck you.

It’s an expression, it has literally nothing to do with men.
Women do fashion for themselves and possibly other women. Maybe.

It’s intrasexual competition, the men don’t even need to be present.
It’s like our gym selfies. Bad example but you really want to be superior to the other men, don’t you?

Do you think men can discern a pair of Jimmy Choos on sight?
Well, not the straight ones!

The ones who’d notice? …I don’t think attracting them is gonna work…

It’s the plot twist to our films because we all get it and you don’t. So much for airhead flicking through Vogue, huh? Visual language and symbology should technically be the male specialty. However, we care about nest-building. That’s why. Men pimp out cars and buy new tools. Same thing.

If men want us to get presumptive and judgy about your sartorial self-expressions then fine, but you wouldn’t like that Choo on the other foot. You complained about the joke about the shoes in SATC literally years ago.* Men are more touchy on the way they dress than the bulk of women, maybe because we’re used to hemline discussions from Kindergarten.

It’s catch 22, we can’t win.

If we dress nice, we like ourselves or are we vain or do we hate ourselves? The invitation to harassment thing is silly, and doesn’t take note of how predators work: they look for insecurity.

If we give up, we’re somehow less of a woman, depressed, crazy and proud of how we look without makeup (like a man). It’s the most ridiculous reasoning, the circuitous bitchiness that personalizes a choice we all must make, since we legally must wear clothes and shops only stock a certain price range and style type. It isn’t about you, it’s nothing to do with observers. Yet you are part of this system and sending signals. Why do ‘sexy men’ go topless? That’s how gay men like them, not women. Must we presume any man in a nice suit is a slut?

This film was a god-damn masterpiece.

Even nuns do fashion. It’s the feminine thing to do. We’re not the sex evolved to present, we’re the sex that selects. Read a bloody book before you prattle on being wrong about evolution.

*It was funny because men are generally clueless about the messages they give out (signals) and expect us not to pick up on them because they don’t care. Yes, we can tell you don’t care. However, you are the sex that should care so it’s funny. You should care because your power is only in asking us out. The rest is us. Insulting us and what we like and our gender role as selective is just ludicrously funny.

If you want to date someone with male psychology, you gay.

It isn’t about the cost of shoes, it’s the choice. If you have bad taste and decision-making, we don’t like you. Similarly, a man who actually takes another man’s style. We can’t stand those, they’re the worst. It’s like implants on a woman.