The type of man who deserves to be alone

Should I explain this?

elitedaily.com/dating/guys-terrified-settle-down-women/1440514/

I shouldn’t have to explain this. I’m not going to. It’s too easy and he’s too thick.

If you don’t read it, it’s the sexual version of this:

tumblr_m4olfi6ggf1r9i8uco1_500

If you can see what’s wrong with this picture in his ‘story’, congratulations, you’re more mature than he is. That is a male, but not a man.

It causes me to wonder how many of these people we immediately label as narcissists are in fact male borderlines, because they don’t have an identity, they follow the social trends with no opinion of their own, following what others say they ‘should’ be doing, complete with other people’s deadlines, and this is indicated by how they want to switch it up, play dress up and try on all of them. As if it’s a choice, what person you are.

Also: good women don’t wait around for a boy to figure out what a catch they are, they Next him before they waste their youth and take the next bus that comes along. A better bus, a bus with a future. Good women are scarce resources, especially in this century, and he expects the MMP to be a place where he has the power….?

Idiot isn't as much a person as a process of doing things wrong

MMP and SMP are complete opposites. 

These people will end up on the shelf like the feminist trying to ‘Have it All’ and they deserve to be. Anyone who treats people like toys and puts them down, leaves them and expects they can come back in at a later date and pick them up again is in for a life-ruining surprise. The worst thing isn’t never finding the One, it’s rejecting them because you didn’t know what you had. Move too early, end up with the wrong person, move too late, end up rejected and alone.

The dating pool shrinks past 30, also when most people hit the Wall pretty firmly. Their potential is either actualized or wasted at this point and that’s why marriages were arranged with slightly older men, because they have to prove their role as providers before a woman buys in. But expecting you’ll have your shit together by (age) is stupid, it’s excusable as a teen because you have no life experience but I keep seeing this from people in their 20s. Most people die before that happens and it’s very rare with the best planning and behaviour. Making and limiting your important life decisions based on fantasies is retarded.

I’ll make a bet. He takes advice from Roosh and co.

aka He takes life advice from somebody with a shit romantic or non-existent marital life.
Do these people take diet advice from fatties?

Oddly, he’s demonstrating hypergamy, thinking he can infinitely trade up like a video game and eventually marry the Best Woman if he holds out long enough. Nope, the good people get snapped up sharpish. This is what I like to call The Illusion of Scarcity. It isn’t about how many men/women there are, it’s about the quality for the thing you want (marriage). Not to mention, he has an anxious-avoidant attachment style to a woman who is clearly indifferent, so even if he got married, he’d get divorced, I’d bet good money.

As for his own SMV, I’ll leave this here.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-sports-mind/201507/when-men-arent-good-looking-they-think

Video: Observe wife entitlement

“We got robbed.”

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

Actual quote. Wow. Just wow fam.

captainnemo

Above: A MGTOW I respect. You don’t contribute to the decline? Enjoy however you want, friend.

You make your bed, be an adult and lie in it.

One way to recognize narcissism, both covert and overt, is the Have It All entitlement.
They seem to believe they can both have their cake and eat it. Contrary to all logic.

Because they’re so damn special… exceptions must be made.

An ignorance of social history I could abide if he didn’t feel the need to reference something incorrect as fact.  That is not how it worked. Ever. Point me to it. Find me it. Go on. Where’s the certain proof, if it was so common with regular (aka not blue blood) people? You can’t because it didn’t work like that, social history is not like the regular kind. It’s more of a balancing act, as people and cultures are so different. He’s outright lying.

IF you came from a good FAMILY, that was WEALTHY, without obvious disease (including something like neurosyphilis), and had the long upbringing of a gentleman, much like a finishing school for ladies, you could probably be married off whatever you did. Your odds were good because they looked at the overall profile of the candidate (the parents) much like hiring for a job today.

They would overlook it, the wife too, as long as it stopped post-marriage, or you’d dishonour the House. And your children could only marry down because reputation is of great import. The cycle continues until penury.

You had to earn Husband Material status. Most of it was parental arranged, like schooling, so basically the (seemingly excessive) moral instruction emphasis was “Don’t screw up. It’s bad for all of us” That’s the one thing young men had to do. ONE thing.

Btw, brothels were an expensive habit. They often included gambling tables. Sex has never been cheaper than it is now.

Here, he not only said You must screw up, and for as long as possible (implied) but nothing about earning your way with an entirely alien type of woman, building respect (the women who file for divorce have one thing in common – they don’t respect their husband). He had no moral compunctions about ruining otherwise marriageable women, but now he expects that, having gorged himself on a buffet of lusts, there will be an untouched corner somewhere he can take all for himself, a pure little corner of natural Paradise untainted by the destruction he had personally caused, mentally dissociated from the way he scorned such habits (settling down) as beneath him before (‘beta’).

It’s disconnected from reality. It’s insane.

No guilt, no shame, let alone no attempt to improve (you can’t fix what you’ve done until you admit you did something wrong). They expect all women have the low standards of bar skanks. Really? When good women are rarer than ever before, he expects he is special.

HAVE IT ALL, ladies and gents. Take a good long look.

In women, we’re supposed to call out this behaviour and laugh. Certainly I do.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/eskil-svitjod/2014/05/guess-what-girls-you-dont-deserve-shit/

Switch out the pronouns and they’d call it feminist propaganda. They can’t stand to criticize themselves (some red pill) or hold themselves to the same standards as they do others. Not even better, the bloody same. A double standard is a silly term for hypocrisy. It’s all about how the individual conducts themselves. Fine, be a shitty person, but don’t act like a saint when it suits, okay? Like the priest pedophile, what you say can never erase what you do, your choices and history. These guys will soon learn that but they’ll be very lonely old men when, with better guidance, they didn’t have to be. Men past a certain age require women to live, they become aimless and dejected and if their wife dies, they usually die shortly afterward. On a timeline of months. You don’t hear these truths in the manosphere because it’s largely run by overgrown boys trying to out-macho one another.

(Women, however, can live decades without men. I leave you to your deductions on who really needs who, where the sexes are concerned).

Back to the Have it All entitlement. I said in Who do these guys think they are? the moral side of things. Look there I won’t repeat myself. In women, they sneer at us in classic projection, like the pajamas boys who sneer at the men lifting weights in the gym. What does society do with male entitlement? Male immaturity? Cos that’s what it is, really.

In men… what? They aren’t victims. That’s bullshit. It’s worse when men do it, what excuse do they have? Listening to them extol the virtues of men and vices of women (unnecessary but thanks), they should all be Hercules. There is not a single excuse to hold water. Man good. Woman bad. When man behave badly, suddenly ….. it’s woman’s fault!

……………….. you’re kidding. You must be joking.

Either women have that power over you or we don’t. You can’t have it both- ah, you can’t have it both ways, narcissists.

You may deserve an object. Fair enough. A coffee after a long shift, new boots, whatever. A person is not an object. You do not deserve another living being, even a pet. Anyone who tries to claim otherwise is probably a sociopath (they see people as objects).

For all the manosphere bitching about carousel riders who want to hop off when they feel the cold breath of the Wall on the back of their neck, they fail to see that this is a behaviour. An unacceptable spoiled behaviour that manipulates good people into trusting a bad person (using them timely for personal ends). Men do it too and don’t get a free pass. Men are supposed to set the moral standard, but the double standards they hold to themselves? No wonder women have lost hope.

Oh, those women exist, Roosh. We stay well away from the likes of you.

You see, there is no discussion of the social rewards.

The social reward of the Bad Girl is fun and popularity.

The social reward of the Good Girl is respect and security. 

The same applies to men, actually.

AKA they do not entertain the class clown. Who respects a clown? Who would marry a clown? Women lie and say we value GSOH. We do not. We never have but now there is an arms race where the men try to be funny and we laugh at their stupid jokes because we like them anyway. Why did we say GSOH, then? The opposite is anger. A man who can laugh off a conflict (gent) is better husband material than one who gets angry. Parenthood requires a SOH.

Note: nowhere does this require dirty humour. Common misconception. And that type of signalling draws in the tramps while repelling the ladies. I’m not surprised he can’t find one…

Although I will admit, this American presumption of whorishness without shame or apology is so offensive to the few ladies in existence, if he met one, he wouldn’t be able to tell.  Maybe wrote them off as feminists for being offended at being spoken to worse than a hooker back in the 19th century. If you read about their come-ons, nowadays it’s practically PG (look up hairy-fordshire).

As I wrote a long time ago, with the sexes inverse;

If you expect a lady, you must have been a gentleman.

You say good men marry the ho. It’s rare, like marrying an abuser in women. They are trying to absolve themselves of responsibility for their relationships. Your male opinion of desirability to the opposite sex is meaningless. Null and void. Women don’t look at the same traits as you and a man who behaves badly could never be good in our eyes. If you want to test a man, give him freedom. Generally, we select people of the same moral level. This conflicts with religion in studies so it’s hard to test. If your friend, this ‘nice guy’ keeps picking out bitches? Keeps having marital problems when she was fine before? The problem is him. You have only been his friend, he might be a good friend and a terrible boyfriend. You can’t know unless you’ve been in a relationship with him. If he can only attract the bad ones? He deserves a bad one. He is himself a bad one.

You’re not a player. You’ve been played. Society has milked you for clothes and club money. Settling down isn’t an option anymore. The window closed. You are burned out. What do you have to offer? Well? Something a younger man does not? You don’t even want such a thing for its virtues, but for novelty. Like a greedy fat kid.

Reproductively, few men have ever reproduced (hatefact) and you wasted your best years to attract the wife material instead developing your ‘skill’ in attracting her polar opposite (and on the flipside, repelling her kind, did you never figure that out?). If she existed back then? She’s already married someone else. She’s gone. Off the market. The bar skanks were attracted to you because you were spending …your MMV. Like they were spending their SMV.

Repost: ‘Alpha genes’, Patriarchy and the Alpha Female

Why? Easier to search for. The reddit trolls can do their worst (bitch). Slight edits made.

Yup gentiles are lesser beings

The ‘alpha genes’ are the ones that get passed on in a Patriarchy. The genes of the titular Patriarch, the dad. Cads are scum in these societies, along with tarts, not fit to lick their work boots. The beta male in a Patriarchy is the man who cannot or will not become a responsible husband and father. They’re the status level of the Japanese herbivores. Alpha genes build and reaffirm their own societal structure, they aren’t cucked out to the reckless hedons.

Cad and tarts who cannot settle down (even settling with one another) will have an atrocious later life. Nobody will support them. There is no support network. Those who will not, for whatever reason, will not be given the opportunities by Patriarchs, created by Patriarchs, that should go to the other Patriarchs (this is why men only got hired in certain fields beyond requirement, because women weren’t Patriarchs either) in the hope of future reciprocal investment or family connection (by marriage). The old boy’s network has no room for bachelors. They have no skin in the game, they have no social proof. They cannot get on professionally, nor will any respectable family introduce them to their daughters. You’ve heard the idea of hiring a man preferentially because he had a family to support, right? The Patriarchs’ network at play. Just like voting rights being accorded by property ownership aka societal investment required to support a family. This was also open to women once they could inherit prior to being open to all men (read: the nomads asking we end universal suffrage are retarded). Once rooted in a place for life, you’d better behave. It’s a check, it’s all a check. Pass or fail. Like the Church law. That’s why we have religion. And God is a literal father. God is also All-Father, Lord of the Universe.

laughing rdj crack up

I love it when (always male) atheists brag and you can almost see the religious people in the room shrinking from their lives and refusing to help them in future.

The ‘alpha female’ does exist, much to the hatred of cads because she shows them up. Feminists have tried to emulate this woman unsuccessfully by mimicking her external appearance (this doesn’t work with virile men either). She is respected by these men, these Patriarchs, and allowed as an exception despite her sex (which they graciously overlook) because she fits the criteria and behaviour (character, honour, must support a family for practical reasons) and doesn’t cause trouble. She deserves to be there. Powerful men aren’t misogynistic, that’s from a position of role insecurity like all sexism. They look forward to additional competition, in fact. She becomes a woman at home as a man ceases to be a professional upon leaving work, there is role flexibility, the family and its structure and support are important.  Alpha females are rare (the product of two alpha parents and their quality) but demonstrably exist.

Weak men (virginTOW, many PUA) hate them the most for supplanting ‘their’ role they refuse to take up and further insult, out-competing them. They will imply they are promiscuous (in spite of contrary evidence) because they need to believe it would be possible for them to achieve it themselves (and reaffirm their ego) and so insult their lucky mate too (like saying he’s being cucked when he clearly isn’t and we live in a world of DNA testing).

Why do they do this?

IF the barriers to entry aren’t one sex (m/f) like they mistakenly thought it was (told by feminists harhar) but the other sex (promiscuity/quality scale, r or K) their worldview collapses. They become ‘bad men’. They fail in life. It was entirely their choice, they cannot blame women for it. The music stops.

I fucked up, they know subconsciously. What do I do? I must fix this. What can I do? What are they doing?

Their reaction to this is a furious rush to Have it All (settle in the case of feminists and ‘players’) and convince themselves they’ve beat the system (sound familiar?). Predictably, they fail because people see them for what they are – desperate and faking it (we use various psychiatric terms nowadays).

They can’t stand happy monogamy. They hate it. Of course they can’t fake it. They burned out their pleasure circuits on meaningless drinking, drugs and one night stands. They are incapable of fully pair bonding anymore and until recently, saw this as a sign of their success as men (not being tied down) because they were lied to about the ideal nature of men (not sociopaths using people up like soul food), when it betrays a broken lack of human empathy and connection in the cold light of day. Of course no one in their right mind would take them after their ruin and shame. If they do manage to trick a poor sap (see the Simple decision game theory post), they will still cheat. If their spouse is Mr or Mrs Perfect they will cheat even more. They hate their spouse and they hate their marriage. They deserve divorce. Both sexes deserve to be divorce raped because they breached the contract and entered into it dishonestly. This is why society (Patriarchy) pressures marriage – K opportunity arises from it. These people are brats. The support network and opportunities dry up and they blame…. the system. Oh what a shock. It isn’t their fault again.

Myth: There are no successful Matriarchs (and by extension, Matriarchies).

Matriarch societies like Italy do pretty well. They’re at First World standard. Much of Europe is Matriarchal, the women run the house. If you disagree, you don’t know Europe. The men wanted to strike out because the home was secured. We all know about Tiger Moms by now. Genius women were allowed to play with the Big Boys – so long as they didn’t try to lower or alter the standards. Hello, Hypatia, anyone? Supreme BAMF. The beta males of that society thought she made such a disgrace of their manhood by existing they tore her apart. She’s the Patron Saint of the Alpha Female. Being an alpha female is more dangerous for this reason. Both women and weaker men are trying to take you down (this fed into the narrative of oppression). Many limit their influence to the privacy of the home for this reason (and we never hear about them in MSM because they’re happy).

War and r/K

That’s the connection I see.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/nation-wimps/201510/the-mating-game-is-changing-and-you-wont-believe-how

A paucity of men would naturally recreate this condition post-war. The remaining men would be the fittest by Darwinian standards, connote status and unconsciously wish to repopulate. Yes, we called this the Baby Boom.

Women do not like sharing their resource, husband, as men do not like consolidating theirs (on one woman, if they are not in love). Men see women as a valuable resource when scarce (a society where most were married and time on the market ‘in society’ was short) but in modern times, most young people are on the shelf, and have advances from their elders to contend with too.

It won’t remain this way. Already I see this happening in real time.

As resources (economic) contract, women will find their voice and demand (marriage or nothing) what they wanted to ask to begin with. Women don’t want to date. It gets boring. Neither do men. Both want something else. What else do the men offer now? ‘Muh dick’ is going to be a sick reply, a base animal response, some women will no doubt become prostitutes to fill the demand when the economy tanks and continue to fund their lifestyle. This is the traditional way and it’s going to happen. Men are not entitled to sex (read: female fertility) but believe this because it’s been practically free for so long. They have forgotten its value and with it the value of women. Why grow up? Why be a real boy when they have all the ‘rights’ and none of the responsibilities? Women are not entitled to male resources either but many aren’t even being given the chance at marriage, and the divorce system can be understood as a form of social reparations from this. It encourages marital settling in women, because if it doesn’t work out with the manchild Mr Second Best, you get a cash bonus from his failure to be a fit husband and can try again, with a persuasive dowry.

The original fault lies with men. If they refuse to grow up and lead, the other issues usher forth.

Feminism has robbed women of the confidence to ask that ONE important question (you want to be a housewife???) and subsequently taken away many of the attributes a man would seek in a wife for good measure.

Further, at least some of what is being reported as rape stems from regret over drink-fueled encounters devoid of emotional connection.

Bingo. Alcohol makes people desperate. Women don’t want casual sex, feminism told them they did. It’s the man’s fault, men have the active role and refuse it (they won’t ‘man up’), then wonder why society is slowly collapsing around their ears. He deceives her, to get sex, then he wonders why she uses his lies against him in a trial.

I describe you, you hate me. Really, you hate yourself and everyone knows it.

Promises are verbal contracts, college students are mature enough to know this. Consent is based on verbal conditions, so promises become vitally important. The seduction laws will end up coming back in and that will be the end of PUA forever. Hallelujah.

A symptom of this manchild phenomena is that women have had to become more masculine to compensate, simply to survive in an atomized society alone. Certainly, there is a little more competition but it’s simply out in the open now. We’re told it’s empowering to be a bitch. Any man wishing to criticize women for doing what it takes to survive in a world without men is a male gamine, a manic pixie dream boy, yet to grow up.

They meet a guy, he calls every couple of months, they spend a night or two together each time, and then they’re miserable because they’re emotionally attached to him and want more from him—for which he might even call them “needy” or “greedy,” should they summon the courage to ask.

That level of entitled bullshit from men (love, affection, sex, cooking, company – the role of a wife, free) is going to fly straight out the window and clear into the Sun, never to be heard from again. She plays her poker chips too early and loses them. Women are beginning to see their fault and Millennials are beginning to reject feminism.

The imbalance is being corrected.

“Relationship preferences and sexual behavior of individuals are responsive to context,” Schacht says. “Men want fundamentally different things from relationships when males are rare than when they are abundant. The rare-male male is the stereotypical fling-seeking cad we expect him to be. However, the abundant-male male is the committed, devoted male from the age of Camelot.”

Patriarchy is coming back.

The manboys should be scared. A boy has a natural enemy – man.

p.s. This explains the entitled character of the stereotypical Baby Boomer.

p.p.s. The ‘alpha genes’ are the ones that get passed on in a Patriarchy. The genes of the titular Patriarch, the dad. Cads are scum in these societies, along with tarts, not fit to lick their work boots. The beta male in a Patriarchy is the man who cannot or will not become a responsible husband and father. Alpha genes build and reaffirm their own societal structure, they aren’t cucked out to the reckless hedons. Cad and tarts who cannot settle down (even settling with one another) will have an atrocious later life. Nobody will support them. There is no support network. Those who will not, for whatever reason, will not be given the opportunities by Patriarchs, created by Patriarchs, that should go to the other Patriarchs (this is why men only got hired in certain fields beyond requirement, because women weren’t Patriarchs either) in the hope of future reciprocal investment or family connection (by marriage). The old boy’s network has no room for bachelors. They cannot get on professionally, nor will any respectable family introduce them to their daughters. You’ve heard the idea of hiring a man preferentially because he had a family to support, right? The Patriarchs network at play. Just like voting rights being accorded by property ownership aka societal investment to support a family. Once rooted in a place for life, you’d better behave. It’s a check, it’s all a check. Pass or fail.

laughing rdj crack up

The ‘alpha female’ does exist, much to the hatred of cads because she shows them up. Feminists have tried to emulate this woman unsuccessfully. She is respected by these men, these Patriarchs, and allowed as an exception despite her sex because she fits the criteria and behaviour (character, honour, must support a family for practical reasons) and doesn’t cause trouble. She becomes a woman at home as a man ceases to be a professional upon leaving work, there is role flexibility, the family and its structure and support are important.  Alpha females are rare (the product of two alpha parents and their quality) but demonstrably exist. Weak men (virginTOW, many PUA) hate them the most for supplanting ‘their’ role they refuse to take up and further insult, out-competing them. They will imply they are promiscuous (in spite of contrary evidence) because they need to believe it would be possible for them to achieve it themselves (and reaffirm their ego) and so insult their lucky mate too (like saying he’s being cucked when he clearly isn’t and we live in a world of DNA testing). IF the barriers to entry aren’t one sex (m/f) like they mistakenly thought it was but the other sex (promiscuity/quality scale, r or K) their worldview collapses. They become ‘bad men’. They fail in life. It was entirely their choice, they cannot blame women for it. The music stops. Their reaction to this is a furious rush to Have it All (settle in the case of feminists and ‘players’) and convince themselves they’ve beat the system (sound familiar?). Predictably, they fail because people see them for what they are – desperate and faking it. They can’t stand happy monogamy. They hate it. Of course they can’t fake it. Of course no one in their right mind would take them after their ruin and shame. If they do manage to trick a poor sap (see the Simple decision game theory post), they will still cheat. If their spouse is Mr or Mrs Perfect they will cheat even more. They hate their spouse and they hate their marriage. They deserve divorce. The support network and opportunities dry up and they blame…. the system.

p.p.p.s. You know it’s bad when Roosh, of all people, suddenly wants to get married. He senses the window closing. He doesn’t get it – you can’t switch sides. You can’t change teams. As an adult, you choose by your actions and on those he will be judged. We don’t ask job applicants whether they think they should get it, we look at their CV. Self-respecting women will look at the way he’s treated women, the verbs he uses like bang as if we’re ketchup bottles and make up some excuse.

The Wall for women (and men) aka Men hit the Wall too

I agree with about 60-70% of this, I won’t do a full breakdown of what’s wrong with it because it’s generally okay. The comparison to children is sound because in the state of nature a man would be responsible for both his woman and their offspring together. Woman is like a placeholder between child and man in this tribal scenario according to strength and weakness but the childlike comparison holds true to an extent. Neotony is nubility is fertility and men have markers too. The reverse of the ones listed i.e. rugged jaw, height, shoulder breadth, cheekbones, brow bone, tighter ocular area (based on ligaments). He doesn’t mention holding men to these standards, despite the real MGTOW focus on self-improvement, which is expected alas disappointing. Do you think women are selfless and stupid? Is that honestly the supposed Red Pill position we’re taking here? Women are just as shallow as men, we simply don’t talk about it. Covered here too. If any honest human could choose between two people and one was hotter, we all know who we’d choose. The Red Pill has no place for liars who argue otherwise for their own ego.

It’s from a very male perspective, assuming too much about women based on myths like we’re an alien race and telling the fake MGTOWs exactly what they want to hear aka the blatant falsehood that All Young Women Have it Easy in the West ALWAYS. I mean, really? Really. Women are so well-balanced in this century, you know, so feminine and perfect and flawless, ideals of our sex. Women don’t have ANY problems… Cognitive dissonance is on the phone for ya. Ring ring ring.

I have never seen the manosphere acknowledge a Male Wall. Men hit the Wall. It’s called aging. Nobody with a secondary education would dare argue men are immune to the ravages of time and age, even if they had never heard of gerontology. Men are more interesting in this regard, and change more than women past middle age. Past 40 everyone is on the downslide compared to their peak selves (18-25) and physically men can extend this another ten years to 35, with enough hard work, but that’s mostly social power than physical prowess and the T-levels back me up. Don’t get Dorian Gray syndrome, guys. If you expect your future is gonna be rosey by virtue of not dying that long, you won’t dedicate the effort in improving yourself now, while the iron, and your body, is hot. Unless you’re lazy, hopeless fakes and just want to use women as an excuse to vent your innate bitchiness. Women don’t even put up with that dramatic nonsense from each other, it’s unattractive.

To ignore biological realities as they apply to your own sex is true blue pill. It’s the same thing feminists do when they ignore ovarian reserves, yet the manosphere says the sperm quality studies and psychiatric risk studies are BS…. No. It’s immature to assume the natural peaks and troughs of nature and disease cannot apply to you, or that you can arrogantly master an aging body. Will to power isn’t that strong, nor delusion.

It gets certain things totally wrong and I cannot abide this e.g. sex drive and gamete quality in both sexes are optimum age 18, it takes a few years for the reproductive systems to stabilise. Hence age of majority and marriage. This might be why eldest siblings do so well, they get the best quality of everything, including their parent’s genetic material. NOBODY gets better with age. Unless you’re a jellyfish or some type of lobster.

Don’t be this guy.

The general tone of this video savours bitter, as if women get all this help from men, and men never get any, ever, and everything is seen through a sexual lens. I help male friends more than female and I’m not the only one. It sounds reminiscent of the tired “Nice Guy” Lie, when being nice is just the cost of being in polite society. Stay in the basement if you want to be a rude gamma/delta bitch to everyone, male and female, because the world isn’t fair (it never was) and passive-aggressively turn against anyone who isn’t willing to pity fuck you for being a decent person, which is such a huge challenge apparently. Nobody is forcing you to open doors for women or carry heavy boxes. If you make a choice or offer, you don’t get to bitch about it. Man up and STFU. You don’t wanna hang around women, fine. There are other men in the world and I doubt they’ll notice. Don’t fixate on them when you choose to avoid them like a cloistered monk though. Do your manly stuff. You don’t need women, remember? This includes emotionally and intellectually. We should barely enter as a topic of conversation. And if we’re so (insert negative adjective here) – isn’t it embarrassing that the amoral examples can pussywhip you like that? I would be embarrassed, as a man, to let a woman, or women overall, have that much control over me.

Nice Guys don’t do things expecting a return. It isn’t an exchange, sociability and geniality aren’t hard for normal people; it’s an action which does not require reciprocation, that’s WHY it is NICE. No gold stars for you. It would be like a girl who goes around handing out home-baked goods who expects everyone can eat them regardless of diet and to be worshipped for it like she’s Nigella Lawson. I have seen this happen and it’s equally as petty and pathetic. The world doesn’t owe you shit. You aren’t under obligation to be nice to people, but if you choose to be, or you are a real nice person, you wouldn’t expect to be owed by the world for being yourself, am I right? That is a mindset of entitlement.

Don’t be like the feminists, or you may as well be their beta bitch.
I say this to try and help you. Your priors are flawed. There is no such thing as burn time, which is meaningless and doesn’t impact your future. You don’t have time to waste, you only have one life. Every single year counts. It’s carpe diem, not Waste Time Today and procrastinate my own future down the drain while being outcompeted by your own age group. This talk and the book basis are priceless advice for women AND MEN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhhgI4tSMwc

Having it All is a Middle Class Myth

http://conservativewoman.co.uk/louise-kirk-women-cannot-have-it-all-without-damaging-their-families-and-homes/

They don’t seem to have noticed how middle-class they are, these female authors telling us that we can have our children, a full-time job, and love it.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am all for women having careers if they want to. We need female doctors, teachers, shopkeepers, cleaners, you name it, to keep our society human. Nor am I against the middle-class. I belong there myself. What I do object to is assuming that all women are the same, and that any woman can “have it all” without damage to family and home…

They outsource and have servants. There aren’t enough hours in the day. I’d rather be a poor worker than a poor mother. Mother is a valuable and crucial job itself. It should be respected.

uhuh hmm o really rlly doubt eyebrow flash lara croft

Forgive the dejected tone, I’ve had the stuffing knocked out of me by a combination of work duties, paperwork errors, EU bureaucracy including the CHR (long story), family complaints, friends attention-seeking because it’s summer, the police (not a bad thing), noisy neighbours currently blasting bad techno music, that SCOTUS rainbow crap on social media, a somewhat minor health quibble and another redpill writer channelling Freud at me. Within the past few days.  I am exhausted. I want to curl up in a darkened room and forget the world exists.

It used to be that all working class women were working mothers. They had to be. They’d scoff if told that was a choice or a good thing.

If you cheat on your wife you deserve to be divorce-raped

(As a cheating wife, her STDs and cuckoldry rightfully gets a woman divorced, men and their STDs, extramarital spending and bastard children likewise don’t deserve to be married).
It’s so important to religious covenant and Christian civilization it’s in the 10 commandments. I can’t believe some of you are blatantly lying about this demand, saying it’s expected for a man to ‘sow his oats’ – maybe in the immoral society you laugh at, even the immoral classes say it strictly applies before he settles down. Observe a settling object, it stops! Completely.

Don’t get married if you can’t be monogamous for the rest of your life, how difficult is this to understand? If you choose to take on the duties of a man, MAN UP. Don’t cower and make feeble excuses for your weakness and personal failings.

I’ve quoted the marriage vow before, marriage is a contractual obligation. If you don’t hold up your end of the bargain you deserve to be sued for it. Act like an adult if you are willing to sign a contract like one OR don’t get married. It’s a choice, freely taken. Honestly, it’s like the doublethink is ingrained among so-called redpills, don’t the words you repeat as an oath before your peers give you a hint about what’s expected of you? “…faithful husband” doesn’t ring any bells?

One of the few means one could obtain a divorce in the strict Olden Days was adultery, it deserves the death penalty in Christianity, it’s right up there with murder because it’s a betrayal of the family unit and spits on society. It means you are disloyal to your own house, useful as a coward in battle, how can you be expected to build, support and defend it?? A man fails to be a man when he cannot do those things. Extramarital expenditure, time and affection on the adultress and/or her mystery-meat bastards detract from what he could give to those who have committed themselves to him (the wife and the children), bound legally, financially and theoretically, after death.

In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife.source

The supposed red-pillers seem to miss out parts like that because they go against Bravado Narrative.

Bear in mind, back then marriage was still a choice. If you aren’t completely serious, don’t do it. If you marry for ego, it won’t work out. You marry to take care of the other person. If you can’t be selfless, if you can’t sacrifice because some insecure manwhore called it ‘beta’, simply abstain from something for once in your life.

“But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.

The reason for the feigned ignorance of marital responsibility is the classic Feminist Dilemma. They want to Have it All but it involves lying to those who love them most in the world, because if you take-take-take and don’t give your due, people have a bizarre habit of abandonment. In the age of technology, cheating will be found out eventually.

Chisora spitting fighter contempt

To those men who go into a marriage actively planning to cheat: You’re no better than the filthiest, fugliest feminists. If you want to indulge your basest urges fine, if you’re single, the rest of us can ignore you, maybe laugh at your antics. However, it isn’t an accident to create damage to a community of people, as cheating does, for a squirt of endorphin; it isn’t an accident of your own volition (I was drunk and other non-excuses) or ‘evolution lol’ and you can help it, even chimps have self-control. Don’t bring innocents into it, people would be correct to hate you for it, nothing to do with your sex or bad culture. If you screw someone over, especially in a contract, expect them to take very deserved revenge. An eye for an eye. Karma is real in the sense that social relations even out over time. In a marriage, all you’ve got is time. Spare the woman the humiliation of being married to you if you truly love her or I hope she takes you to the cleaners when she finds out.

Video: Faux MGTOW entitlement and presumption

Essentially, they project their self-hatred onto women. They fail to self-improve. Have you ever met someone self-hating, who self-improves? They cannot exist, and this is why the likes of feminists demand everyone sink to their level (these are feminists by mindset if not ideology).

If you seek to improve yourself, if you strive, a masculine virtue, the effort and skill, potential mastery, will make you happier about your place in the world. Even if the whole world went to shit, like the Zombie Apocalypse scenario, these types envisage they’d be badasses, their subconscious is giving them the clues already. If you are competent, the type of society you are born into (yes, this one is less than ideal, get over it cupcake it sucks for everyone) becomes a challenge, instead of a ceaseless burden (give yourself time to process the denial, grieve and get over it, hence enjoy the decline).

These boys are Millennials, raised by women (Fight Club hat-tip) whose first response to anything is to bitch (subject matter doesn’t matter) and retreat (feminine!). No wonder the hot women aren’t lining up. Men compete sexually, women compete socially. This is the world. No quality woman is a slut. Women don’t need to put out and if they wanted to, why would they choose the bitter guy? The loner loser? Why would you want to talk to them at a bus stop, let alone shag them? These boys fell for a feminist lie – women love sex as much as men (no), the sexes process it the same (deffo no) and slutting around is good for you (hahaha no). Et cetera. Your conclusions are wrong because your assumptions are deeply ingrained by years of blue-pill programming.

Bracket people by behaviour and context. ‘All women this’ is just as bad as ‘all men are rapists’. What do they do? How does context inform what they are doing? i.e. don’t fall prey to fundamental attribution. Are there honest women? *waves* Are there dishonest men? (cough male feminists cough) Having a y-chromosome doesn’t exclude you from being a dick. You don’t get a ‘free dick pass’. [Masked man fallacy, you logical men you]. If you’re no better than the low class of women you deride, what is the point? Show us some supremacy. Have fun with it.

I looooooove being right, with appropriate datasets ofc

Life isn’t easy unless you’re rich. Don’t be a baby about what you can’t get.

Men have a Wall too.

I’m tired of seeing this Peter Pan BS in the manosphere. Men age. Men age terribly. There are no current male sex symbols beyond middle age. I respect men enough to tell them the truth. Look at the average older man, he looked better in youth. There is no magic pill. You will age too.


Brad Pitt in his prime vs. Now, post-Wall. Such a terrible loss.

Men have a Wall too, but it can be kept at bay a decade or so longer on average, perhaps (considering genetics).
It still exists.

Timescale based on the average male;

25-35 hair loss – includes overall thinning

35-45 weight gain, beer bellies and man boobs (reduce alcohol and other sugars)

45+ back ache, knee pain, other joint issues preventing you from doing certain sports (supplements and surgery)

Anyone over 50? Risk of accidental injury goes way up.

Studies are random sampling I pulled up and read quickly because I don’t get paid for this.

The hormonal malfunction is a big issue and quite the norm for both sexes. Everyone knows by now about testosterone drops in men, you could supplement. However, that isn’t all you need to concern yourself with.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21397200

I will take the high ground and leave comment on sexual performance to other people. Except to say merely having erections become infrequent (compared to the person’s own youth) and when maintained, softer (artherosclerosis and alcoholism make this worse). This happens gradually to every single man because 40 is not the new 20 for men either. Please don’t delude yourselves like the feminists. Please? We all have telomeres.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142745/

In general, don’t be fat while you’re young or you’re screwed. It’s easiest to shift weight while young because of hormones. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19540307

Be wary of dosing yourself with too much testosterone. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741229 “conversion to estradiol by aromatase converts the androgen to estrogen activity”

Sadly, men have a prime. Deluding yourself by pointing the finger at women (who also age, duh) won’t help you personally.
“The loss of muscle mass is one of the most striking characteristics of the ageing process.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955329/

Invest in good skincare, stress hits men worse. No one looks good with a face of excess wrinkles. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140910132532.htm

See aging as a neutral thing. Be stoic about it. Hence why I’m pleading with you to drop the Peter Pan myth. You aren’t helping yourself or your sex (if male). http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140220095001.htm

Get cardio check-ups if you do supplement T. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141112115930.htm Be wary if you have family history.

“The rate of physiologic, or molecular, aging differs between individuals in part because of exposure to ‘gerontogens’, i.e., environmental factors that affect aging,”http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140528133209.htm Tip: SPF with both UVA and UVB filters for air pollutants.

Finally, fertility. If I were a man, I’d have frozen my sperm age 18. Honestly, you guys have it so easy for method and you don’t do it! Why??? If the manosphere’s “Have it All” dream were to hypothetically come true for you as an individual, your children with your (ideal) 18-year old blushing virgin bride would be far healthier if you used your youngest sperm. If you are even considering possibly having kids, someday, get your little soldiers frozen pronto, there is even a name for this mutation issue. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect You can’t blame this one on women! Your insurance policy is as easy as masturbating into a cup! I wish we women had it that easy, use your advantage.
For general fertility issues conceiving at all (naturally, as you assume you could);
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253726/ “Age-related infertility will continue to be a problem. A basic understanding of the issues is critical for health care professionals so that they can effectively counsel patients who are considering a delay in childbearing for social reasons or for those seeking fertility treatments. This review details the changes in fertility seen in the aging male.”

Surely, the use of these references has helped you to wake up to the real dangers of this? This Peter Pan, Dorian Gray-style denial? If I hated men, I wouldn’t tell you any of this out of spite, and let you find out by yourselves. I am not trying to tell you what to do, I am trying to point out the medical fact that an older man is physiologically inferior to his youthful self. Factor this into your choices and decision-making, since you’re classically the logical sex that acknowledges hard truths. Prove it!