Video: Pedo hunting adventures in forensics

I am posting this totally randomly, like everything else.

Appealing to Google is the wrong move, though. They won’t help.

The pedos can be caught quite easily, if there’s will to.

While I’m here, let’s change the subject.

There is a fact about ritual sacrifice that goes unreported for obvious reasons. If given the “wrong” dose of surgical anesthesia, a person could feel pain, be entirely awake but couldn’t react physically to said pain (flinch, run, possibly screaming). They’d be paralyzed physically and awake mentally. Think of when you’re incredibly sleepy and present but can’t really move. You could compose quite a performance art piece with that. Satanic rituals are based on sadism and the energy created by stress.

Hit me with your cancer brick

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/14/mobile-phones-cancer-inconvenient-truths

Hit me

(beat)

Hit me.

From my research, iPhones are worst.

This is fine.

A cull of telly-tubby mobile users would be grand.

Meanwhile, Musk baits the internet and thinks he can win.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2018/jul/13/who-wants-to-be-a-billionaire-not-elon-musk

Silly old man.

It isn’t because you’re rich, it’s because you’re a conceited, attention-seeking dickhead.

Who won’t let other people just do their job because you’re used to blowhards of the Silicon Valley blowing up your ego like a misshapen balloon.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-14/elon-musk-told-shove-proposed-cave-solution-his

Gay face is real because hormones are real

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/07/artificial-intelligence-can-tell-your-sexuality-politics-surveillance-paul-lewis

Somebody study cuck face.

I suggest Elon as #0.

Show me the percentages.

For lolz, an app that tells you who got Botox would be funny.
A quick way is to view from the slight side, if their brows are way too arched. Normal people see a dip as the brow curves down the bone and causes an illusory drooping effect.

Another app that tells you percentages of origin from mystery meat or predicts what a race-mixed kid would actually look like based on the parents.

“As well as sexuality, he believes this technology could be used to detect emotions, IQ and even a predisposition to commit certain crimes. Kosinski has also used algorithms to distinguish between the faces of Republicans and Democrats, in an unpublished experiment he says was successful – although he admits the results can change “depending on whether I include beards or not”.”
True.

But who wants to tell them personality research is generally a con?

“It suddenly struck me,” he says, “introverts and extroverts have completely different faces. I was like, ‘Wow, maybe there’s something there.’”
True.

“Thieves were notable for their “small wandering eyes”, rapists their “swollen lips and eyelids”, while murderers had a nose that was “often hawklike and always large”.”
I think women have the right to a rapist predicting app.

“Kosinski’s research dismisses physiognomy as “a mix of superstition and racism disguised as science” – but then argues it created a taboo around “studying or even discussing the links between facial features and character”.”
If you have nothing to fear…
It’s like how to spot an ugly person online, they argue beauty isn’t objective and men never are.

“There is growing evidence, he insists, that links between faces and psychology exist, even if they are invisible to the human eye; now, with advances in machine learning, such links can be perceived.”
No, you can train it.
Women with good creepdar seem to be born with it.

“There was also anger that Kosinski had conducted research on a technology that could be used to persecute gay people in countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, where homosexuality is punishable by death.”
It’s already legal to abort for no reason, maybe screech about that?
One day, a gay pregnancy test will exist, along with an ugly and a stupid one.

Market forces, mate.

“In a mocking critique posted online, Todorov and two AI researchers at Google argued that Kosinski’s algorithm could have been responding to patterns in people’s makeup, beards or glasses, even the angle they held the camera at. Self-posted photos on dating websites, Todorov points out, project a number of non-facial clues.”
Why the hate?
1. money loss
2. They’re scared there might be an algorithym for pedo face and their own friends could pop up.

“Thus,” he writes in his paper, “gay men are predicted to have smaller jaws and chins,”

Everyone has a chin, that’s an indicator of genetic health. Stick to jaw.

“slimmer eyebrows, longer noses and larger foreheads… The opposite should be true for lesbians.”
“This is where Kosinski’s work strays into biological determinism.”
That’s just called biology. An apple seed grows into an apple tree, not a Seville. Grow the fuck up.

“At times, what he says seems eerily reminiscent of Lombroso, who was critical of the idea that criminals had “free will”: they should be pitied rather than punished, the Italian argued, because – like monkeys, cats and cuckoos – they were “programmed to do harm”.”
Guardian doesn’t believe in evolution (or inevitable cases of organic atavism).

But when I press Kosinski for examples of how psychology-detecting AI is being used by governments, he repeatedly falls back on an obscure Israeli startup, Faception.”
“On its website, Faception lists eight such classifiers, including “White-Collar Offender”, “High IQ”, “Paedophile” and “Terrorist”.”
Gotcha.
Personally, I want to see the high IQ trait details.

Illuminating, what they choose to flag as a threat.

“The last time I see Kosinski, we meet in London. He becomes prickly when I press him on Russia”
News journalists have no right to interrogate scientists like the truth police.

You report on fluffy animals, stay in your lane, Lois.

comment from our superiors
“If you put Rees Mogg into the system does it confirm that he’s an utter bellend?”
I’d like to see the average attractiveness of conservatives against how right-wing they are.

Personal reasons.

Link: IQ and standard of living

http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2007/01/state-iq-and-standard-of-living.html

We need an update.

Take the data, Trump. Publish it. Far and wide.

The State already controls how you reproduce. It takes money from the barren to pay for another’s child.

Taking child support from a non-parent is illegal….?

OT

The biggest Dem weapon is the welfare cliff.

This won’t end well, idiots

MRAs are stupid as the SJWs, they’re a form of SJW.

You cut off the vital support for the natalism (healthy courtship and family structures) every society needs.

Most men in the world hate you because of your race! For historical reasons, no negotiation out of this one.

How many is that? Let’s visualize!

Consider soil erosion and the dwindling arable land. Lotta people gonna starve.

And “white” is a very small number of genes swirling around, all recessive!

No Singapore brides for you! (Debt/GDP is also higher than America, idiots).

 

Where all the white people at?

Consider the IQ implications too.

That’s incredibly optimistic. I know plenty of non-whites claiming white on the census.
And Russians are technically not white, based on genetic distance. Neither European nor Asian. That’s a quarter or so down instantly.

And half these figures for the men you seek to cooperate with, who still might want to kill you.

National interests, which you might not care about, but many do!

Ah, America, deluded as usual.

https://www.reference.com/world-view/ratio-men-women-world-population-5afd68eb596fbafb

“The world ratio of men to women is estimated to be 1.017:1. As of today, the world’s male population was 3,776,294,273, while the female population was 3,710,295,643.”

Race > Sex for identity politics.

Statistically, if you are being intellectually honest. Your common culture has nothing to do with the average male of Saudi Arabia or Sub-Saharan Africa. Your WEIRD culture is decidedly racial, not even all white, WASP! The decidedly North-Western European genome! Your work ethic has little in common with an Italian, male or female!

You are already a minority. The world minority, by race.

850k/2 = 425, minus 100 or so for the elderly or infant. (conservatively)

325 million white men of fighting age worldwide.

To say nothing of willing. Most modern men are cowards.

And you think the women are your problem?

Not the almost 7 billion strong racial outgroup and growing??

Sure, they won’t try to steal the women either, where’s the precedent? I’m sure they’ll leave you alone, especially as they starve and you’re so successful and they outnumber you!

The Spartans did so well! You can totally take billions of angry hungry people that build the defense technologies you rely on, to sit around keyboard warrioring about middle-class Gender Studies majors!

(Nobody mentions their bachelor tax and subhuman status of unmarried men, treated like children).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

7.6 billion – 850k white = total N white people.

Then there are class factions, you don’t see upper-class white men having any problems getting work, no middle-class men wanna change this system or present with a strong impetus for Brotherhood collectivism! Which goes so well in China and India btw! No nepotism, totally meritocratic! No men left on the shelf in marriage markets there! And since when has a pan-White male union ever existed? Bloody warfare for millennia.

Oh but feminists are the only deluded ones, O.K.

You can never be questioned or wrong, but you aren’t stupid!

Your assumptions magically prove themselves, look at all your imaginary data and cherry-picked “studies” with no replication or concrete methodology!

All men R smart and all girls R dumb, treehouse cooties ew.

Just ignore the left side of the bell curve, one whole full side of the IQ bell curve.

That’s so smart of you, like the SJWs, if you ignore a problem, it’ll disappear!

Because when you look at homelessness, mental illness and crime rates, it was all magically the fault of women! SOMEHOW.

But women deny responsibility for themselves, don’t they guys?

Men would never do that….

Men would never have the hypoagency to deny the murder, rape and theft rates among their sex, would they? They’d never say NAMALT!

They’re red pill! They’re STRONG.

SATIRE INCOMING:

Men would never cry victim. Like in child support cases. It just doesn’t happen. They don’t deny their gender role to provide as patriarchs. They aren’t postmodernist hippies.

Men deserve respect for breathing, even if they act like children. How dare you shame a Peter Pan into growing up! Magical Freudian penis rules. Europe must respect every African male that treads on this soil, right? Don’t be sexist, like Sweden! Open borders because men never do evil or dishonest things?

Let alone the mathematical majority of them!

Men are more capable than women, so should be held to a fitting, higher standard, right?
No?

And men never rape other men, that’s absurd!

Men cannot be victims. Either that or their super-secret “body language” meant they really wanted it because men are the world’s whores, don’t you know? Always willing with anyone at anytime for anything. Because body language is a science, like palmistry. Even a baby can consent if it gives you special body language like crawling on you or SMILING – Saint Epstein will argue in his legal defence. All rape accusations against a man are false, the stats be damned! We demand to be taken seriously, we aren’t blinkered and ridiculous at all. It’s against the laws of physics for men to be victims of stalking, harassment or “real” rape and if you say any different or hold men to any adult standard of behaviour in the First World, well, you’re a misandrist (but misogyny is just, like, science, duh).

And in the olden days, men never died without reproducing, it just never happened.

Men don’t need impulse control, property rights will magically enforce themselves! I can leave my car unlocked in a diverse male area, I can trust my fellow men! I can let men sleep on my couch without paying rent because Brotherhood! It isn’t parasitism, if a man is doing it!

Men are forced to reproduce. It was an Oops! baby, a mistake! They didn’t know sex made babies! They can’t be held responsible for their reproduction! What did you expect them to do, get a minor simple outpatient procedure to ensure it’s impossible?

BUT men make better parents even though women only exist to make and raise babies. Women evolved to care for children but somehow, men are better at it. Men are better at everything, LOL, duh! Women evolved for no skills, are simple as children (but only female children) and a barren woman is useless to the economy, why are the WW2 women laughing at us?

It isn’t like girls and women pass the exact same blinded examinations men do! The IQ difference is definitely bigger than the statistical chance of 5%, especially once you’ve selectively rigged the results by taking out all the predominantly male retards. That’s just science. You hate science if you complain about systemic bias in calculation.

The tests should be different and the same depending on our feelings.
We don’t know the difference between equal and fair.
But women are hypersensitive and emotional. They make rape jokes about us and sausage gags all the time. Making a man feel bad should be illegal, it’s all that snowflake’s fault! They need to go to their safe space but Gent’s clubs are totally valid. No, none of us are gentlemen and weirdly proud but other men aren’t allowed to impose standards on us either! We’ll call them sexist, too!

And the test must be rigged if they do well! Except military tests, then rigging is good. Except we want the female draft. We don’t hate women, we just want them to go overseas knowing they’ll get murdered or captured and raped by foreigners, cuck!

The highest ideal of manliness is an r-selected, alcoholic, drug-abusing, nomadic manwhore. The Sexual Revolution is unquestionable, ignore antibiotic resistance, paternal abandonment and damaged pair bonding ability. We R da best 5eva. Men can never do better than this and should be shamed for trying.

Damaged goods only applies to women, ignore player burnout. Nothing behind that curtain.

BUT fathers shouldn’t be obligated to co-parent, to spend time with their child as a mentor like the old days to ensure its mental health! When a woman fobs her kid off on the nanny, she’s a heartless monster. When a man fobs his child off on a nanny, he’s being responsible and should be given a medal!

Women have a responsibility to breed like a sow but not men! Because that’s how babies happen! Lesbians!
And furthermore, men have a right to continue their genetic line regardless of quality (this isn’t r) and don’t need to pay a cent while the woman is investing biologically in two decades of labour, totally helpless.

It’s Darwin, men must spread their seed (citation needed), I’m sure the kids will survive.
No men in history weren’t absolute, amoral sluts. None were celibate. None died virgins. No great men weren’t crazed rapists like Genghis Khan. What a great man that slaughtering rapist was.

This is the ultimate good for society, which just happens to coincide with my sloth. It isn’t a sin, I am very lucky. This is not a privilege. I’d gladly swap with my ancestors to see more women in dresses.

It’s a coincidence I can act like a big baby and society enables this.

The problem is WOMEN.

I’m oppressed by all the free lust, free welfare, free schooling, free sympathy for my sin!

I hate that my vices bring no consequences, really! I want a Patriarchy, just like you, fellow conservative!

Stop being degenerate? What? It’s my right!!! How dare you! Next you’ll want me to pay for my sexual partner’s birth control! Oh, in Patriarchy?

Well, no, I’d just be raping your Christian teenage daughters and haha, you couldn’t stop me… what’s… what’s the rope for…?

And you’d totally have to pay for my “girlfriend’s” abortions. Not me. You pay for my orgasms. Because I exist.

Prostitution is wrong because then sex has a price paid for by me, person in receipt of service! It belongs on the taxpayer, that’s the moral choice!

It’s never been easier to survive in all of human history but this world sucks because there aren’t busty under-age Japanese girls servicing me under the table at every meal. Women are so entitled to want a husband. But they should find one or they’re defective.

I don’t wanna save for my own pension like a sucker.

We are not the luckiest and laziest excuses for men ever! Wastrel is still a word that totally has meaning now everyone is doing it, so it’s moral! It’s legal too so it mustn’t be antisocial!

Also gay is evil but lesbians are holy. Obviously? It’s just obvious porn does no damage. Fuck neuroscience.

Government largess is only evil when single mothers are doing it, when men hold the baby, they deserve all the money in the world. In. The. World. Or you’re sexist. And I’ll cry at you online but rape threats are funny, totally not to be taken seriously. You’re so weak, we don’t bully anyone. I’d totally say this to your face in public. Twitter is a public space.

R-selection can magically be contained to one sex despite being a sexual selection process between two sexes in societies.

We need traditional marriage and only traditional marriage – except I can cheat without being stoned to death, have bastard children and leave if I get bored without being sued for abandonment. That’s what commitment means. I’m such a catch, why does no good woman want me?

Women are females but male is insulting. Girl is normal and a compliment but if you call me boy, I can attack you. The law says whatever I want it to.

We don’t believe in “male”, it’s a social construct to tell us to man-up like we’re adults or something biological. But there are two sexes and we’re totally different. But we’re tired of double standards, women should be treated equally to men, it isn’t fair. We’re so rational. Ignore the suicidal ideation, all men should be like us. I’d choose this life again. Pass my antidepressants and testosterone pills. This is normal.

SATIRE OVER. Back to the demographic.

And I’m sure there won’t be any anti-white traitors in the white or non-white male group either.

In your dreams.

Where you all happen to have an IQ of 128-135, as you claim online.
But cannot do basic arithmetic like that up top, somehow.

You are not entitled to a waifu, you gotta earn it. That’s the red pill. This economy sucks for everyone. You are not special. Life really is that hard.

The First World is paying for the older generations’ “entitlement” and the rest of the world, with a reduced population. It isn’t the women. You say it’s white women going on welfare while admitting out the other side of your face that the birth rate is next to nothing. Okay, ban birth control? Marry? No? I think you’re too chicken to admit the other factors.

This is biodiversity 101 and you fail. If you think either sex can afford to rentseek and be spiteful, you can’t do maths.
The SJWs ignore it because they want to kill Western Civ, idiots. They don’t just hate white men, it’s women too! Rotherham? 

Misogyny makes no sense, it’s still your suicide and also that of your genetic line (kin).

You sure showed those SJWs, giving them exactly what they want!

Human taxonomic diversity paper

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/woodley-2009-is-homo-sapiens-polytypic-human-taxonomic-diversity-and-its-implications.pdf

Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications

The term race is a traditional synonym for subspecies, however it is frequently asserted that Homo sapiens is monotypic and that what are termed races are nothing more than biological illusions. In this manuscript a case is made for the hypothesis that H. sapiens is polytypic, and in this way is no different from other species exhibiting similar levels of genetic and morphological diversity. First it is demonstrated that the four major definitions of race/subspecies can be shown to be synonymous within the context of the framework of race as a correlation structure of traits. Next the issue of taxonomic classification is considered where it is demonstrated that H. sapiens possesses high levels morphological diversity, genetic heterozygosity and differentiation (FST) compared to many species that are acknowledged to be polytypic with respect to subspecies. Racial variation is then evaluated in light of the phylogenetic species concept, where it is suggested that the least inclusive monophyletic units exist below the level of species within H. sapiens indicating the existence of a number of potential human phylogenetic species; and the biological species concept, where it is determined that racial variation is too small to represent differentiation at the level of biological species. Finally the implications of this are discussed in the context of anthropology where an accurate picture of the sequence and timing of events during the evolution of human taxa are required for a complete picture of human evolution, and medicine, where a greater appreciation of the role played by human taxonomic differences in disease susceptibility and treatment responsiveness will save lives in the future.

Humans are a species, deal with it.

I don’t care if I’ve posted this before, I’ll post it a hundred times if it’s true.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/14/a-reply-to-common-race-denial-claims/