‘Member Hillary’s rape enabling?

Makes a lot more sense post-Weinstein, I’ll bet.
Never let this die.

There’s your rape culture. The upper-middle screwing everyone else.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2014/06/16/listen-to-hillary-clinton-laugh-while-talking-about-getting-a-suspected-child-rapist-off-the-hook

“Clinton was honored by the Children Defense Fund in September 2013 for being “a tireless voice for children.”

You couldn’t make it up.

https://twitchy.com/jimj-3633/2014/06/20/free-beacon-banned-from-clinton-presidential-library-for-reporting-on-hillary/

Say… is Hollywood paying their “fair share” of taxes, like, ever?

Q. to Mr Clooney.

You shouldn’t be asking actors and actresses how much they make, but how much their productions paid to the taxpayer watching them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting
“Michael Moore sued Bob and Harvey Weinstein for creative accounting to deprive him of his share of profits for the film Fahrenheit 9/11. Eventually, Moore reached a settlement with the Weinsteins and the lawsuit was dropped.”
“A WB receipt was leaked online, showing that the hugely successful movie Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix ended up with a $167 million loss on paper.”
Where do you think Rowling got her fortune?
http://www.optimataxrelief.com/hollywood-saves-billions-production-costs-tax-credits/
They actually take taxpayer money in credits.
Why do you think actors are so wealthy?
If actors didn’t have unions, they’d be poor – but unions are nationalistic and exclusive. One rule for them….
https://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/hollywood-accounting.htm

Then again, The Royals do it. Markle will fit right in.
https://boingboing.net/2017/11/05/appleby-bermuda.html
St. Apple is on there.

Oh, but “drama is under-funded”, the Guardian constantly cry.

Well, maybe they could fund themselves out of their profits.
Like every other company.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/arts-funding
Over 1,700 results.

Meanwhile, on the topic of fucking up schools, Tories value French over engineering, deliberately ruining the working class by treating them like the middle-class. This way, they can hire foreigners at slave wages with no guilt because the natives “don’t want to” do those jobs they aren’t qualified for.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/aug/08/schools-cut-gcse-funding-ebacc-scores
“The school is considering whether to lose other subjects such as engineering and construction from its options for 14- to 16-year-olds.”
Why is there a shortage? We need more actors!
“Where are these pupils going to find that freedom of expression elsewhere?”
….Literally anywhere? Going to the local theatre as a hobby? Community theatre?
I know enough people in theatre that this line was unintentionally hilarious. Shakespeare in the park? YOUTUBE? Like teenagers need an excuse to show off. Technically, live video is performance art. They now stream theatre performances live so you try to deny it, Cumbersnatch.
A teacher from Rotherham (no shit) says
““In my area, school is often the only place children have access to art. They aren’t from families who will go out to a gallery. They can’t afford to go to the theatre. The things that are being removed from them are vital – this is their only access to experiences that are going to enrich their lives.”
They could stop subsidizing theatre tickets for everyone and just make them free to children.

Why is America taking all the engineers for Silicon Valley?
Why can’t Britain compete with its own industry? Since we invented it?
It’s a mystery, folks.

http://the-toast.net/2016/04/14/plays-for-normal-people/
The middle class mocks how classist this prole-funded hobby is.

You may recognize this author.

http://the-toast.net/2016/07/01/a-note-on-the-toast/

More incest than Game of Thrones.

Hillary returns home to run Dracula’s Castle

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-spotted-at-a-victorian-castle-resort/article/2610487

Tales from the crypt

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-win-is-lesson-for-media-and-academia/article/2608267

Likewise, “Journalists, at our worst, see ourselves as a priestly caste,”

Neoreactionaries have all their jimmies rustled.

The Brahmin know.

Democrat nominee 2020

Bernie FTW.

Openly Communist, at least.

They have one chance to win against a re-running Trump outright.
Outdo him with the only reality star who’d have a shot at becoming Democrat nominee.

Kim Kardashian for POTUS.

VP at least, don’t be sexist.

You can’t get more immigrant-friendly than a woman from a successful immigrant family or more sex positive than a woman famous for her sex tape. She’s married to a black guy, she’s perfect!

Look at the signs. Read the tea leaves, Neo.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2115737/Kim-Kardashian-eclipses-Obama-Twitter-gains-14-million-fans.html

It would be foolish to laugh. People laughed at Trump too, when he said he’d run.

http://spiffysean.com/2016/10/19/endorsement-kim-kardashian-for-potus/

Don’t pick Hila-reeee again. Unless you wanna lose.

More blame for Hillary

http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2936-elite-white-feminism-gave-us-trump-it-needs-to-die

I guess it’s better to blame the figurehead?

I guess intersectionality is coming to the Left. As if they could be any less relevant.

Typical dense SJW tactics to double down on something that doesn’t work.
Pandering to increasingly niche groups of people to be edgy, doesn’t win you elections.

Conservative political savant Karl Rove said this week on Fox News that focus groups conducted with working-class women showed that they didn’t care that Clinton would be the first woman president. And compared to Obama in 2008, Clinton won fewer votes from women, whether they were black, Latina or white.

Oh now you listen to Fox.

Mentioning race obscures the classism.

Her tone-deaf campaign didn’t even pretend to transcend such class divisions. Once she had secured the nomination, Clinton offered few ideas about how to make ordinary women’s lives better.

Guess which one is actionable?

The campaign endlessly touted endorsements from the ranks of the celebrity one-percenters, especially women. In the end, Clinton enjoyed a gender advantage only among the college-educated.Among white women without college degrees, Clinton lost to Trump by 28 points. It was almost as if waitresses in Ohio didn’t care that Anna Wintour was #WithHer.

The elite feminism Clinton represents is also a white feminism.

Wait, do you really expect every Democrat candidate after Obama to be black? And what about the Hispanics? The Muslims? I thought the Democrats sold that they were capable of sympathy?

She was more interested in trying to attract white suburban, Republican women. In the end, African American turnout was lower than in 2012.

You felt taken for granted? Welcome to the world of white people.
This election cycle, across the world, the left lost the working class whites.
Blaming the blacks for exerting agency, what a shocker. Why do they expect Democrat support? They aren’t the blue version of Uncle Toms.

Feminist writer Jill Filipovic went much further in her disgust for the masses, tweeting about Clinton, “Sorry, America, you didn’t deserve her.”

They agreed.
They still don’t mention the scandals.

As well, if white male solidarity with a misogynist and racist – or, for that matter, any special feelings about Trump – was a huge factor, he should have invigorated the base. Yet there was no surge in Republican voters –Trump got fewer votes than Romney in 2012.

My God it can read.

It was dumb of America to elect him.

See I may be condescending, but I insult individuals, not entire countries.
Why did Democrats lose again?
I bet they don’t know voting is correlated as a civic duty to high IQ populations who feel responsible.
Awkward.

Feminism now has an opportunity to move beyond the go-girlism of the Sheryl Sandberg set.

The nice PR stuff. What’s left? More Dear White People?

But we can’t do it with leaders who would rather hobnob with billionaires than fight for ordinary women. A feminism that revels in its identification with people like Clinton – forming groups with names like Pantsuit Nation – is not a feminism that values the lives of most women.

Turn on the people with power?
These are not smart women.