AKA why I’m not personally concerned with the degenerates signalling like us.
They lack all the traits to survive like us. They’re trying to cuck us into protecting them (no).
“This boasted civilization of ours falls to pieces when stripped of its veneering and reveals man’s innate evil propensities in all their hideousness….”
The original good intentions of feminism – to contribute and prevent war deaths.
And by contribute to the workforce, I mean improve everyone’s lives.
AKA the purpose of capitalism.
Half a century later.
“There are fewer unmarried men at large than there have been for years and years.”
“Women are more likely to marry men about three years their senior.”
Many people lie about these time periods but cannot provide a scrap of conclusive evidence that these people were the way they claim.
The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.
TLDR; read bolded.
It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).
Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.
Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.
“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”
It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.
Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.
Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.
Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?
Especially those in other time periods.
^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.
Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.
In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.
Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.
This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?
Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.
Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.
Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.
The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.
Everything you know is wrong.
Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.
Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!
Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.
Casual or modest, pick ONE.
I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.
This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!
He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?
The problem is male demand.
Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.
You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.
You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.
Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?
More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.
Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?
Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…
Which fork, Forney?
They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.
Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.
The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.
This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.
These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?
Are you quite sure?
They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.
Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.
Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.
However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.
Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.
You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.
Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.
Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.
I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?
Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.
Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.
Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.
We mock idiots like you.
Owing to the resurgence of the same stories, I’d like to point out a few things.
Small opener to this well-known photo, since a picture can tell a thousand lies.
You can look up the aerial details elsewhere.
“Since when was history proven through a novel?”
Mass Effect real, confirmed.
The false dichotomy reminds me of superhero films. You have the Hero team (entirely Jews, it seems, in all these movies, despite how the first inmates were political prisoners aka ethnic Germans) and the Villain team, complete with the same ‘scary’ outfits when it makes literally no sense. It’s like wearing goth boots to the beach. There were many designs and re-designs of the Nazi uniforms over the years like any country with divisions and changing executives. Those outfits were barely used. Yet we see SS uniforms when it’s completely factually wrong because… it’s stylish? Because it’s, as Spielberg called it, a ‘sexual evil‘? WTF is that? It sounds like black comedy. Fiction is no documentary.
The strangest thing I’ve ever read about the Holocaust, which was taken as fact and never allowed to be questioned by anybody, was that a man claimed to survive fatal gas. As in, no oxygen, like the others in the room, and no brain damage, miraculously. Does he have non-human lungs? Did he close his gills? How many times, did this man claim to survive the gas chamber method? No less than six. Six times. Tell me, if you take the worst view of Germans imaginable, and say that, yes, these were death camps, intended solely for execution, would they not have shot him in the head after the first time? Buried him alive? Hanged him? No? Is this not common sense to anyone else? German efficiency. It is not America.
There is one woman who claimed to survive practically everything and live with Anne Frank. Frank was in the medical facility (Auschwitz-Birkenau, which took the very old and very young, and had the most active hospital ). Frank also died of typhus, not gas. Ironically, the gas would’ve killed the typhus.
They’re still rolling these people out, new stories like a grislier Anastasia, even though it’s starting to look frankly absurd given the ages they must have been, to be present.
Nowadays, there are probably only a handful of Nazis in the world. And a horde of swastika fags, clutching their false notions of superiority as something you’re born than something you do.
1 Yes the people supposedly going around murdering everyone employed doctors to keep them alive. Reality bites.
“ST. LAURENT – As an 11 year-old boy held captive at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II, Moshe Peer was sent to the gas chamber at least six times. Each time he survived, watching with horror as many of the women and children gassed with him collapsed and died. To this day, Peer doesn’t know how he was able to survive. “Maybe children resist better, I don’t know,” he said in an interview last week.”
“The room fell silent as Olsson told of witnessing firsthand the horror of the “death factories” created by the Nazis. She told stories of German soldiers being ordered to shoot babies in their mother’s arms-killing both mother and child-to not waste two bullets. She spoke of seeing the Angel of Death-Dr. Josef Mengele-and the hospital where he experimented on young Jewish children by infecting them with diseases such as tuberculosis.”
Do you really think they’d let anyone see these things, secret things, ‘war crimes’  committed by the people who didn’t connect Hitler to this in any one document… and let her live?
2 No such thing at the time, really.
I was told to watch the film and a couple of others by a Holocaust professor to ‘get a feel for what it must’ve been like’ so they definitely know what they’re pushing. Even putting it in black and white makes it seem more authentic, like WW footage. We associate B/W filming with truth.
If you were Spielberg, and you knew you were ripping people off on the facts of the matter, ignoring the possible extent of the ruse (this was prior to the Internet’s success, you had to trek to the library and order things in), would you include a cheeky wink and nod to this deception? Would you include an Easter Egg for historians?
Or maybe an entire scene?
Where’s the scam?
You’ve been staring right at it.
Fun fact: The devastating Ralph Fiennes later got an Oscar nomination for playing a Jewish Holocaust camp survivor. Way to play both sides, almost admire it.
Update: To trigger some people who don’t use their eyes, remember the woman who played Helen? No?
The character that created a thousand lesbians.
hey, these posts are fun
advice to the guy: faster tempo, less monotone sound like you’re reading out a lecture, imagine you’re flirting with someone at a bar, fast back and forth to ideas
The origin of the name Scotland and the Stone of Destiny.
Africans don’t have red hair and straight noses, also statues are absorbent, a lot of people dunno that. These white people (red hair is recessive down the ENTIRE line, it’s a Neanderthal trait actually) brought horses and chariots to Egypt, along with metallurgical technology (later expanded during the Scientific Revolution).
NW European genetics link at 7 minutes. GENETICS. 70% of British men. Less than 1% of modern Egyptians have that connection.
KANGS WUZ KANGS. WIZARD KINGS WITH MAGIC ROCKS.
Once read a theory that Jesus was in Britain during one of his disappearing binges.
I bet that ties in.
Someone get this guy on alt right podcasts.
Seriously, why is he not a thing?
Relates to the Rhesus Negative mutation, which prevents outbreeding to an extent by aborting Positive babies (look it up, medical fact), thereby it must‘ve evolved in isolation (recessive).
Rh- is not present in Africans. It comes from the Cro Magnon man.
TLDR: OOA (Out of Africa) is BS. The BBC should really hire this guy since he crosses over into forensics, wider biology and other fields that are nigh-on impossible to falsify (unlike most mainstream cultural anthropology). That would be intellectually honest, which we know they are not.
The woman on the cover of The Occult Secrets of Vril may have known Nikola Tesla.
I find it funny there are Europeans in Canada who…. idolize Europe….
but stay in Canada…..
unless you’re setting up an Empire, no. 
It isn’t a male thing either, you need both sexes to make a healthy society or it dies.
But what is it about Europeans that gives us this high ‘tendency towards the infinite,’ as Spengler put it? What is the source of what he called the ‘Faustian’ spirit of the West?
I think they mean the personality trait psychoticism, completely different and not a mental illness.
It relates to genius and risk-taking.
It slots in perfectly.
Please do that research.
I think we also suffered great national losses to those positive prosocial traits during both World Wars, while the cowards and infirm sat home twiddling their thumbs. It would explain the social discrepancy between new demographics, where it’s hard to believe we ever did any of those great things, and the old demographics, where the news was full of various discoveries, inventions and explorations.
Associated with creativity, this psychopathic competition for glory and esteem, evolved men who restlessly found a way to go beyond whatever was currently considered rational or possible, inventing new concepts, abilities and technologies.
That’s completely and utterly wrong. ‘Associated with’- Yes, murder is associated with life.
You mean psychoticism, not psychopathy. Don’t be one of those sad-acts who idealizes the dregs of society because TV told you they wear cool suits and get all the babes (no and no). In reality, if you read Hare’s books, they’re outcasts, they are losers who die young and deserve it. The paragraph is a fairytale and I feel dumber for reading it. Don’t just pluck a disease out of thin air and pretend it’s a good thing. You’re studying personality, look at personality dynamics.
“evolved men” no
you can’t just evolve one sex
that isn’t how evolution works
Look at any successful ancient civilization and both sexes were great e.g. Sparta.
Femininity isn’t an excuse for weakness.
Genius isn’t an illness, repeat that until you internalize it; it’s a lie the elite have always claimed to keep their own power. GENIUS IS NOT A PATHOLOGY. THERE IS NO PATHOLOGY FOR GENIUS.
There is one disease truly associated with creativity and that’s bipolar disorder, there is plenty of neuro-scientific evidence, including GENETIC,
up to entire books, for that one single connection but that doesn’t sound cool so you won’t see these guys claim it. Also, women have it too, have you noticed certain sections of the internet keep trying to claim that women are all crazy (gaslighting), womens’ diseases (by heavy-skew prevalence) are all bad and all characteristically female (as if men don’t have emotions etc) and furthermore, there is NO male disease (fucking borderlines, I’m tellin’ ya) apparently, it’s all one big conspiracy (uhuh) and that any male disease is in fact, good for society? Ignore facts, logic and the swathe of evidence in the destruction caused by these men, apparently we’re meant to let them off the hook cos they are male and ‘boys will be boys’? That is true, but adult men are not boys. I think they need to study the Medical Model before they go claiming this shit like an SJW or maybe the dictionary definition of disease.
Point of fact, bipolar just have super high openness, a personality trait. It isn’t even their clinical disorder either. Psychos have the opposite, they’re closed-minded and never change, they make the same stupid mistakes over and over and over again, like a movie villain, based on the type. They have no common sense. They are thick. Can you find a single study showing psychopaths have high IQ? No, you cannot. Sociopaths maybe, but they’re a timid milquetoast version, like comparing a modern, smoothie-swilling athlete to an ancient soldier.
Point of fact, psychopaths are the most UN-original people you will ever meet, they’re that guy stealing credit for the slightest things like an idea in a meeting, and they save their own skin before anyone else. Stop treating them like superheroes, if you met one you’d hate him. They’re angry, broken people who hurt other people because it distracts them, they have no nobility or even basic moral values. The words mean nothing to them.
1 The EU is actually a European Empire, but it failed because it’s Commie-run. Every time I hear their “dream of a United Europe” I think yeah – so did Hitler. Except that guy was determined to go anywhere but Europe, and that’s why he lost. They’re making a similar mistake, taking care of basically anybody except native Europeans. Stop looking out. Clean house first. Otherwise, nothing out there matters.