Matilda Lockhart and the American savages

https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/flo02

 According to Maverick, the girl never recovered from her experience and died two or three years later.

They deserved to be conquered, there’s no such thing as a noble savage.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-native-american/

Video: Islamic inventions

Check out Islamophilia.

The virus is so two-faced and patronising. Well, infantilizing is the literal term.
>”I invented everything!”
>”Of course you did, baby!”

It’s trendy to pick on Afrocentrism.
But to be truly on the edge, Islamocentrism.
Because stealing Greek manuscripts is the same as writing them.

Even IF.

IF.

That were true.

What the fuck happened?

Why is Islamic Dark Ages a term? Not during the European Middle ages, I mean the cultural shift to ignorance way beforehand.

Why do you resist reformation and basic science, like the earth revolving around the sun?

What have all your geniuses been doing for centuries (when you didn’t murder them on record) for over a millennium?

Why did white people have to invent the Scientific Method? NW Europeans, not even all white people!

Where were you?

Why do you still have Third World problems? Couldn’t your people have fixed these?

Why did you lose when we finally fought back against conquest in the Crusades?

Why did so many empires fall?

Why do you rely on the evil West for primitive 101 things like water supply?

Bestiality? At the very least, less incest. Not eradication, look at our Queen marrying her cousin, just less.

What’s the deal with the very current phenomena of child rape? Even little boys?

Where’s the self control in your young men?

 

You can’t take a culture that values lying and expect it to be intellectually honest.

A scientific society isn’t just something you can claim. It shows.

Where is the IQ data?

Traps not new + non-sexual flashing

along with the so-called ‘feminine penis’. I despised typing that. Curse you internet.
I’m in a teaching mood.

Called a anasyromenos pose.

Onto the non-sexual flashing, it’s only because modern culture is heavily sexualised that we instantly view nudity as such.
Anasyrma, women flashing, is classically used to ward off evil, including demons. This is why feminists expose themselves.
It’s also a de-erotic display of nudity, non-sexualising it and normalising it like it was in classical times.

I mean, it’s just hair. Men have it on their face too.
We might call the behaviour flashing but there’s no sexual intent or arousal whatsoever, it’s comparable to the Greco-Roman attire that frequently exposed breasts or became translucent under direct sunlight. There’s no shame because we also show other body parts like arms and ankles, but it shouldn’t be objectified as sexual by a witness either.
There are female flashers and voyeurs but they are incredibly rare and the typical by far is male perpetrator, female victim. It falls under the clinical category of courtship disorder.
Meanwhile, the minority of men who sexualise everything in existence unless they aren’t involved, (then go on a long tirade about objects like sex toys being a sign of mental illness in women) are also the reason stuff like this exists.
Can the BlowYo sex toy actually replicate the feeling of a blow job?
It’s quite funny when such men, trying to appear worldly, are completely naive to the fact vibrators exist for men.
Have at it.
Should you be worried about your vagina absorbing the ingredients in your lube?
I wouldn’t be shocked if this were bad for the male microbiome too.

 

What reaction mustn’t become

There is a far more immediately practical reason for reaction to involve itself in the exploration of time, however: to take steps to avoid what it could scarcely otherwise avoid becoming — a sterile orgy of disgruntlement. Finding nothing in the present except deteriorated hints of other things, reaction soon slides into what it most detests: an impotent micro-culture of vocal, repetitive protest. This isn’t right, this isn’t right, this isn’t right quickly becomes white noise, or worse (intelligible whining). Even when it escapes the ceaseless, mechanical reiteration of a critical diagnosis (whose tedium is commensurate to the narrowed times it damns), its schemes of restoration fall prey to a more extended repetition,  which calls only — and uselessly — for what has been to be once more.

from http://www.xenosystems.net/reaction-repetition-and-time/

Ever brilliant and timely.

We shouldn’t shirk critique of the past nor improvement in the present.

Any fool can say That is wrong, it’s concern trolling, few people can tell you what to do instead.
Has the requirement for the old policy changed? It’s like interpreting the Bible as if you live in the place/time of its writing. Don’t. It should be a living document.

But the swastika isn’t even a spiral…

http://runesecrets.com/rune-meanings/sowilo

If you’re gonna graffito bollocks, get it historically accurate?

You’re confusing it with celtic spirals and knots, totally different.

It’s a hvel sigil? Like a summoning portal? The cross bar?

Shapes have meanings, combinations have meta-meanings.

Me-mes, if you will.

Shit, I’m pretty sure I have books on this topic.

Hitler’s Master of the Dark Arts, Himmler’s Black Knights and the Occult Origins of the SS.

I knew it. At best, it’s a wheel since all portals were presumed to be moving, magical energy.

Like an LSD trip. Or toilet water.

Wheels had unique properties in European culture, it wasn’t just the torture kind.
Although we do have a fetish for circles.

Take it with a pinch of salt but yes, this information exists.