Video: UK disease vectors and plague

Reminder: applies to all infections, not just sexually exclusive ones.

The prohibition on sodomy also applied to sodomy with women for the same reasons. It’s the same exact act, normalised in Jewish entertainment.

Sexually, it’s always men who are the main vectors of any disease (for many reasons, including going out more, washing hands less). Until literally a few years ago, biologists assumed the male urethra was always clean (immunoprivileged, like the eyes) – until they actually checked it... Turns out no vital pipe is clean, if you’re being a slut (sorry, “sexually active”). Men are the main vectors of any condition, and with HIV, ebola, this obvious “corona” (really pneumonic plague*) virus going round, knowing who’d be the likeliest carrier socially could save your life.

R-types are known for being happy Typhoid Marys, it isn’t just bug chasing “gift givers”, they can consciously pass on lesser conditions from spite (usually homoerotic, so other men are largely at risk). Even with a simple stomach bug or a norovirus, they’ll have an impulse to “meet up with old friends” so delay those ‘invitations’ past the incubation window and they’ll suddenly lose interest.

(Borderline and sociopathic women also do this, but usually it’s men).

Making people sick gives them a thrill of power over your body. And it’s mostly legal (with certain STD exceptions, that are ABH here up to GBH dependent).

*The Chinese gov keeps writing COD as ‘pneumonia’ because it isn’t corona. It’s plague.

The Black Death came from Asia too. Do your research. This is why they refuse to share DNA with Australia – it isn’t corona. Just a theory, but it’s the only thing that fits their paranoia. COD docs are legally binding.

They never did find a cure for plague, it’s almost Biblical.

B-b-b-but muh appeal to authority?! – some moron

K.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-020-0156-y

A few days ago:

Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, could be weaponized.

Unfortunately, development of new vaccines is limited by lack of correlates of protection.

aka unlike other diseases, they can’t pump out a plague vaccine on the pipeline

We used pre- and post-vaccination sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a flagellin adjuvanted F1/V vaccine trial to evaluate for protective markers. Here, we report for the first time in humans that inverse caspase-3 levels, which are measures of protective antibody, significantly increased by 29% and 75% on days 14 and 28 post-second vaccination, respectively. In addition, there were significant increases in T-cell responses on day 28 post-second vaccination. The strongest positive and negative correlations between protective antibody levels and gene expression signatures were identified for IFNG and ENSG00000225107 genes, respectively. Flagellin/F1/V subunit vaccine induced macrophage-protective antibody and significant CD4+ T-cell responses. Several genes associated with these responses were identified that could serve as potential correlates of protection.

Paper for compulsory vaccination… just like Spanish Flu.
Fun fact: Most of those who died were vaccinated.

But wait, why would you need a vaccine for a bacterial infection?

Don’t ask questions citizen, just take the injection.

nytimes.com/2019/11/13/world/asia/plague-china-pneumonic.html

Pneumonic Plague Is Diagnosed in China

Memoryhole absolut.

EARLY NOVEMBER, 2019.

It turns out, I have been researching this stuff for my health.

The Twenties are gonna be funny.

What would happen to their economy if we knew the truth?

Even if it were coronavirus:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2001468

The novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) from Wuhan is currently causing concern in the medical community as the virus is spreading around the world.1 Since its identification in late December 2019, the number of cases from China that have been imported into other countries is on the rise, and the epidemiologic picture is changing on a daily basis. We are reporting a case of 2019-nCoV infection acquired outside of Asia in which transmission appears to have occurred during the incubation period in the index patient.

Asymptomatic, Typhoid Mary types.

Late December 2019.

You know what spreads great during the invisible stage? Plague. Just sayin’.

What’s more likely? A disease magically changes on an almost daily basis* – or the Chicoms are lying?

*According to the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, redditfags! They’re throwing shade in academese.

I hate being smarter than everyone but I waited for them to release the truth, sportingly, and they didn’t so screw you, China.

 

[#~*intermission*~#]

 

If AA wants a wild ride, check homosexual studies of paraphilia if you can find them – inc. sadism (especially rape, interest in actual rape), cross-dressing, pedophilia (attraction to minors) and bestiality. When surveyed, interest in death and necrophilia is also reported but it’s hard to find that stuff online. Most serial killers are homosexual. (and also circumcised)

Gays need anal Botox after too much anal sex

Which, Biblically, means any anal sex.

http://www.towleroad.com/2017/06/anal-botox/

I wonder how many girls (and guys into rimming, pegging, whatever ‘anal play’) will need reconstructive surgery because they did something unnatural with bisexual men in denial?
Jesus has abandoned us. There is no God here. ~dogs howling~
Remember, this and STDs are the wages of sin.
No pity. No remorse.

It isn’t the same, just look up the terms ‘anal tear’, ‘anal leakage’, ‘anal sex cancer risk’, ‘anal prolapse’ and ‘anal sex diapers’.

If you cared so much about your body, what feels good and how you look – you wouldn’t do it. But NOOOOOOO. You just wanna be trendy.

For those of a sciencey bent;

https://gutbliss.com/2015/09/08/was-it-good-for-you-sex-and-the-microbiome-bloat/

“bacteria from the anus and groin can gain access to the bladder through the urethra,”

Click to access Marrazzo%20microbiome%20MTN%20annual%20meeting%202017.pdf

It actually changes the vaginal microbiome (swirly swirly). You can follow on the cited studies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816837/

It hasn’t been studied long-term. It isn’t safe.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110035/

“Previous studies have linked elevated semen VL to sexual practices such as unprotected insertive anal sex [7], which could introduce gastrointestinal bacteria into the male urogenital compartment and semen.”

If you wouldn’t lick your finger after sticking your finger in there, use a condom at least?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262074342_Certain_attributes_of_the_sexual_ecosystem_of_high-risk_MSM_have_resulted_in_an_altered_microbiome_with_an_enhanced_propensity_to_generate_and_transmit_antibiotic_resistance

Money study: gays responsible for antibiotic resistance. Significantly.

The next plague, coming to a gay bar near you.

It is an abomination.

But if you have gay sexual habits, that includes you.

“It is argued that in comparison with heterosexuals, high-risk MSM (hrMSM) have a higher prevalence of oro-penile, oro-rectal and anal sex which facilitates an enhanced mixing of the pharyngeal, rectal and penile microbiomes.”

Anal sex linked to anal cancer, says Captain Obvious

http://www.medicaldaily.com/does-anal-sex-lead-anal-cancer-3-facts-and-myths-400561

Close to 90 percent of anal cancer cases can be traced back to HPV. But the cancer itself is relatively rare.

Not the point. You shouldn’t have STDs in your arse.
That’s the point.

If only we had a book of some kind, teaching people these basic facts of life.

What to do, sure, but more importantly and practically, what not to do…

Yeah, that’ll do.

Honestly, the worst lie atheists peddle is that the rules of reality are arbitrary.
Things are called bad for a reason – because they ARE bad for you. Personally.
Morality is based on the individual and their dumb-arse choices.

Couldn’t resist.

It’s gay sex. Doesn’t matter if you’re doing it with a woman, if you’re not doing it with the woman parts of the woman. Gay sex habits, gay sexual statistics. Because we know that bell curve ends well.

“And though cases have been slowly increasing in recent decades, only one of every 500 people will develop anal cancer in their lifetime, generally between the ages of 55 to 64 — a stark contrast to the one in every 22 people who will develop colorectal cancer.”

  1. Not correcting for sexual ‘lifestyle’. Not an argument.
  2. As if microbes cannot migrate. Through the same system. With zero boundaries. The area of the tract is vastly larger than the opening. Accounting for physical size.

See note.

“Similarly, the greater number of sexual partners, the greater the risk of cancer.”

I keep seeing the manosphere complain about prostate cancer but deny… this bit.

http://www.livescience.com/45743-sti-std-trichomoniasis-trich-prostate-cancer.html
How did it get there? Magic?

You can only shut out reality for so long. Before it comes knocking on your backdoor.

You notice how so few of these sex-positive people are willing to talk about medical facts, from HBD to STD immunity?

Prostate cancer is under-funded, therefore women are wrong.

Prostate cancer is bad, therefore breast cancer is funny.

Prostate because man. Manly man macho man. Listen to Mr Man. Anal fun.

Note: This pathogenic cancer aetiology is a great score for Gay Germ theory. I wonder if the ‘men’ indulging in the medically, morally wrong type of sex to imitate porn stars (great sexual role models) will show greater effeminacy (and other atypical gender psychological outcomes). So the pussies complaining about cancer in men as sexist are happily spreading germs they know probably cause cancer in women. No sympathy necessary.

“two-thirds of new cases are diagnosed in women.”

Did I mention the best part?
Men can catch and keep STDs in their urethra from not wearing a condom, it makes you less of a man regardless of where you stick it. It doesn’t just protect the woman/receptive party.  Even the testes are not immune, as Ebola shows.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279435042_Immunophysiology_of_the_Male_Reproductive_Tract

I mean, anal sex with a woman can still result in pregnancy so I don’t know what argument they’ve got at this point.

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/mom/pregnancy-from-anal-sex

Almost like it’s evil (as eating bad pork used to be fatal, prior to antibiotics and electric ovens). All the stuff about the sin of men lying as with other men refers to this practice, it isn’t exclusive to gays but it’s the only internal type they can do, they don’t have as much choice. When God got mad at sodomites, they might’ve been doing it to women, also raising questions about spilling seed with the expected pre-marital stuff to boot. I mention that because the guys who get high and mighty about doing it with women, are actually worse according to the Bible than the homosexuals they look down on.

Wherever anal sex is discussed, it should be dismissed, based on literally ALL the evidence.

Never taught to kids as the ‘same’ and OK to emulate based on porn.

The link between childhood sexual abuse and homosexuality in men

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-008-9449-3

I’m surprised this was published. That’s so sad.

Existing cross-sectional research suggests associations between physical and sexual abuse in childhood and same-sex sexual orientation in adulthood. This study prospectively examined whether abuse and/or neglect in childhood were associated with increased likelihood of same-sex partnerships in adulthood. The sample included physically abused (N = 85), sexually abused (N = 72), and neglected (N = 429) children (ages 0–11) with documented cases during 1967–1971 who were matched with non-maltreated children (N = 415) and followed into adulthood. At approximately age 40, participants (483 women and 461 men) were asked about romantic cohabitation and sexual partners, in the context of in-person interviews covering a range of topics. Group (abuse/neglect versus control) differences were assessed with cross-tabulations and logistic regression. A total of 8% of the overall sample reported any same-sex relationship (cohabitation or sexual partners). Childhood physical abuse and neglect were not significantly associated with same-sex cohabitation or sexual partners. Individuals with documented histories of childhood sexual abuse were significantly more likely than controls to report ever having had same-sex sexual partners (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.16–6.80, p ≤ .05); however, only men with histories of childhood sexual abuse were significantly more likely than controls to report same-sex sexual partners (OR = 6.75, 95% CI = 1.53–29.86, p ≤ .01). These prospective findings provide tentative evidence of a link between childhood sexual abuse and same-sex sexual partnerships among men, although further research is needed to explore this relationship and to examine potential underlying mechanisms.

I’ll let you figure out the pedophile implication on your own.

Classic 4chan: There are two glasses

Because it’s popular on TV, like blowjobs before that. You’re just as much lemmings as women buying celebrity lines and there’s a false bravado in talking a woman into it (except there isn’t, only the skanks will do it, like most things in porn). A real man learns something male-focused, like tantra. Those guys are like Sex Jedi. As with the rise of oral cancers, there’s a scale of health to abnormal practices and anal is pretty much the worst thing a person could do (rimming is included). It’s Nature’s Petri Dish. If you made a cocktail (sorry) grown from 1% of the sample in the girl they wanna try it on, they wouldn’t stick their dick in it for any money, it’s like drinking from a toilet. The natural disgust reflex has been overcome like the drug-fueled reality of gay culture has been overcome with sober musical theater numbers. If they make you a little bit gay (they’re pushing for men to ‘try it‘ now), how can you question them? You can’t judge. You can’t make any of those classic jokes about it. In short, you don’t get to complain when you get prostate problems or seemingly random infections, like a homo. Eventually this posterior focus turns you into this guy.

Technically, your sexuality is what body parts you’re attracted to (which vary based on the other type of sex). If you choose A over V, I’ve got news for you… If you could do it with a man, arguably it’s homosexual sex. I await the hate, I expect the hate for simply pointing this out, but you did it, dudebros. You tore up your Man Card like the pederasts of Ancient Greece (bc the young boys looked like girls from behind). I hope you get a lot of checks. Please get tested frequently.

dean that's enough no more internet laptop shut no no no nuhuh supernatural

n.b. STD is a latent disease, you’ve got it but your immune system keeps it in check. It’s part of your microbiome now. STI is active infection and requires meds to drop it back to the level of a regular STD. Rarely does it clear from your system, if ever. It can be a hidden factor in male fertility, fucking up your man pipes.

Link: What Gay Pride is really about

http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/
R-types are disgusting.
Children are brought to this, to witness it… the question you must ask yourself is why. No doubt they are grooming those children for a time when the paedophile’s “orientation” is no longer taboo as well.

If you ever read about Sodom and wondered what it looked like, wonder no more.

This did make me laugh;

Notice how Divine Interventions purposely makes blasphemous dildos mocking all major religions except Islam. It’s easy to taunt people that you don’t actually fear. I’ll start to respect them on the day they make a Mohammed the Penetrator dildo or Anal Probe Allah.

A project someone could undertake.

“Homophobia” (homoaversion) 36% genetically inherited (heritability study)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292426/

Who was born this way now, bitches?

cool nothing shocks me scientist indiana jones calm haha amused

 Genetic modelling showed that variation in homophobia scores could be explained by additive genetic (36%), shared environmental (18%) and unique environmental factors (46%). However, corrections based on previous findings show that the shared environmental estimate may be almost entirely accounted for as extra additive genetic variance arising from assortative mating for homophobic attitudes. The results suggest that variation in attitudes toward homosexuality is substantially inherited, and that social environmental influences are relatively minor.

Aversion to walking public health risks is like avoiding zombies during an apocalypse, it’s just common sense.
Add to this how many cancers are pathogenic (some caused by STDs or physical contact) and it becomes evolutionally intelligent.

This is considered cool for a reason, it's the reaction of a person who can handle their shit

Their entire legal premise is a lie.
The opposite force is heterophobia and the lesser term heteronegativism, because sleeping with somebody’s bisexual husband or wife is grounds for a stabbing.

h/t Reddit.

Gays didn’t want a marriage certificate after all

http://www.mercatornet.com/conjugality/view/after-same-sex-marriage-then-what/15908

Conservatives critiques were entirely justified.

They indeed wanna control what you think, feel and do.

This isn’t North Korea, you nutjobs. We (read: everyone) have a right to disapprove of literally anything, for no reason whatsoever. Having opinions isn’t illegal (mostly, in my country we’ve devolved).

They thought it would force everyone else to shower them with praise for a sexual behaviour. That’s like the BDSM lot trying to get whips sold in supermarkets because kids might think it’s less scary. I doubt a circuitous pseudorationale like that would ever, in a million years, change somebody’s mind, and their brainless caricature of conservatives, thinking the piece of statist paper makes a difference to their scripture or biological conception of a holy union (fertile, can make babies, the express purpose of marriage), is absurd. Deluded SJWs fail at life again.

There is a slight insinuation that by gaining “Governmental” acceptance (not really, votes vary) and controlling the cultural narrative in framing gay marriage as functional, happy, healthy, monogamous blah blah blah – they could, in turn make this sunny view (completely opposed to reality) real. In short, they’re blaming straight people for the fact their lives suck. Domestic abuse, drug use, HIV/other STD rates, rampant infidelity (rendering even straight marriage invalid)…. sure, blame the straights. Blame Whitey. Blame those evil men. Blame everybody for your actions and insecurity – except yourself.

Remember when the gay crowd had a backbone? Me neither.

NHS: Cancer or condoms?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2973020/PLATELL-S-PEOPLE-pay-gays-unsafe-sex.html

…As of April, no fewer than 25 cancer drugs that prolong life will be withdrawn by the fund.

Imagine how these cancer patients and their families must have felt this week when, following a major trial on a £12-a-day drug which helps prevent people catching HIV, they learned researchers were recommending that healthy gay men should be given it free on the NHS at a cost of almost £5,000 a year per person.

All so that the lucky recipients can have unprotected sex with less chance of catching HIV…

What kind of ethics is it to save one group of society from a disease that can be prevented by using a £1 condom, while denying cancer sufferers a longer life?….

People are not one group anymore, they’re interest groups. The cancer group don’t have the hate speech laws on their side and numerous legal counsel to protect the ‘rights’ which aren’t rights.