The Sexual Revolution was for men

Yeah, how could anyone deny this? They were gaslighted by male psychopaths.

“You deserve to be used and discarded without the protection of marriage!”

“Consent is important …because you cannot prove a negative”

“Saying no is just your false consciousness talking, dignity and modesty is oppressing yourself”

Women work more hours per week than ever, earn less money, get less infrastructure, won’t get SS, their husbands might abandon them for a younger model, lower happiness rates, single motherhood is encouraged, STDs on the rise because “men” won’t wear a condom yeah you definitely won all the prizes… for fucking stupid.

-slow sarcastic clap-

They didn’t even win on the orgasm front.

ON THE ORGASM FRONT.

Women report less sexual satisfaction from

1 one night stands

2 circumcised men

3 being left wing

4 being unmarried to the partner

5 being on the Pill.

What did they win, again?

Herpes, HPV and cancer. You won HPV and actual cancer.

Hook-up culture’s natural outcome: rising impotence

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/apr/22/sexual-dysfunction-cuts-risk-leaving-thousands-in-uk-without-help

Of course, they’re willing to sell you medical interventions.

Maybe snake oil?

Just don’t give up porn or stop fucking around.

Because while you’re weirdly the first active generation to have these problems EVER, it cannot be modern habits empowering, sorry, causing them.

And in the women’s case especially, it isn’t their bodies telling them (as in the men’s) that not bonding* with the sexual partner fully (emotionally) eventually causes physical problems?

Nah, can’t be. Would the sexologists of postmodern academia lie about this?

Don’t look at the conservative sex life study, whatever ya do.

Nor ask if they’re vegan. Check their hormones. Nah. Sure it’s fine.

*What would that even be called? Who ever heard of pair bonding in evolutionary mating patterns?

https://www.amazon.com/Hooked-Science-Casual-Affecting-Children/dp/0802450601

As one reviewer pointed out how sluts whip manwhores:

Often referred to as the “monogamy molecule,” vasopressin seems to be the primary cause of men attaching to women with whom they have close and intimate physical contact.

into marrying the ho.

Your kids

Little Emperor Syndrome is genetic. I never met a brat without brat parents.

Great point, but reverence for marriage itself is what we’re aiming at. It isn’t about any individual being ‘happ-y’, like every divorcee ever crows, humans aren’t like dogs, happiness doesn’t happen – it’s a useful excuse to do whatever they want in the moment, usually swinging, the true origin of hookup culture. Liberals started acting like everything was all ‘for the children’ the moment they wanted access to the neophyte brains of the conservative’s children. A behaviourist once said ‘give me the boy at 7 and I’ll give you the man’. You give a liberal your kids from 3-18… and they’re a drooling moron.

Once the ‘consenting adults’ excuse to morality doesn’t apply, they have NOTHING.

Men sluttier than women

Nobody is ‘lying’ either. Learn to read the research, not the commentary feed from some butthurt bloke. The lie scales are applied to both sexes (independent variables) in a given study. That is how they are constructed, literally. For comparison’s sake aka the study, it holds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/sexual-health-and-advice/8958520/Average-man-has-9-sexual-partners-in-lifetime-women-have-4.html

Why the discrepancy? you wisely ask.

There are fewer female sluts than male, but they put out a lot more per…. ahem, head.

cute wink

Result? Men gain more ‘experience’, to put it politely.

Now, a little theory…

Remember, this studies frequency of switching. The cause can be traced back via IV to frequency of sex acts too, as the two variables are intertwined (men and women). Otherwise, logically, and sexual congress requiring one male and one female, you would expect even results e.g. men 5, women 5. Men are switching between more women, as you can see from their mean, but they are switching among the same pool of women, necessarily, whereas the total of females is much lower. The average female switches partner less, yes, but what type is the average woman? …

Told you promiscuity, the act, was the problem, and male in face. If you insist on blaming one sex, they’re at the centre of anything sexual, online and off.

If you have data, go ahead and prove me wrong, manwhores.

This is as silly as arguing cuckoldry in the age of DNA testing.

In short, this suggests, pending further results, that men use and use up a lower quality of woman before trading up socially to their final partner. Kinda like a good hand to hold in blackjack. To have and to hold.. They crave the social security like women crave the sexual kind. Hypergamy is a mass neurosis of projection, to anyone who can read.

You don’t see large groups of women on the prowl, versus Pull Nights ( lads on the pull). [SATC is fiction, globally and historically.]

Pool* = sample, arguably the SMP in practice.
Female mean = the total available females in theory, e.g. including the married, the aged, the ill and the celibate.
You see the issue? They’re all lumped together, the data isn’t stratified correctly. Deliberately.
Even a bar chart based on partner count or sexual frequency in a week would be illuminating.
However, the number of count for slutty males must be even higher, because as not-practicing women hold down the slutty average, the number of non-practicing men hold down the manwhore mean too.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Isn’t science fun?

This accurately traces the perils of lumping the sexes in together, obscuring mating patterns which crossover i.e. promiscuity. Further data computation was required to assess this question.

Obviously none of this data includes rape or other sexual crimes.
Accusing all men of being rapists is exactly as stupid as accusing all women of being whores. They’re both over-reactions designed to defame the opposite sex’s reputation from different sides (take/be taken, force/choose). Instead it cleverly plays on an old question Can a whore be raped?

Nobody mentions this. So I have to.

Link: Sluts, Game and stupid decisions

There is no enjoying the decline in this area.
The hedonic treadmill is burning them out, until they’re empty husks of people incapable of love. (The manosphere ignores weakened pair bonding ability occurs in men too).

http://freenortherner.com/2015/08/16/sexual-liberation/

The problems are twofold. The problem with the women is obvious – if you’re cheap, you’re treated as cheap.

The problem with the men is barely discussed – immaturity. Those are not men. They act like teenage boys, complete with video games and lad culture. Part of the low fertility rate is refusing to settle for these manboys, they can’t even take care of themselves, let alone others or lead a family.

Game won’t work forever, it’s emerged in response to extreme r-type decline in the sexual marketplace. What will these boys do? Curl up and die, in all probability, so conditioned to do the easy thing over the right thing.

Darwin wins.