Sargon: Censorious social media

Un-personing is against human rights.

Digital Sine nomine.

They’re depriving a person of their livelihood, nowadays a social media presence is compulsory. They brought this about, they are duty bound to it. They serve US, all of us.

Terms and conditions do NOT apply above the state’s law and common law.

Terms and conditions are not legally binding documents until proven so. They are literally made up and “complied with” completely arbitrarily – not how real laws work.

These are ideological witch hunts.

300 years ago, they’d be accusing the prettiest woman in town of being a witch because she wouldn’t sleep with them.

comment

I would question the moral code of these social media companies especially YouTube. I flagged content made by a YouTuber encouraging adults to sleep with minors (named kun Tyra or something) and YouTube kept the content up without flagging the channel for child endangerment. Let seek out this union and because this behaviour stinks to high heaven.

It’s like how tumblr is a porn site but parents let their kids on it because the kids only show them sweet Disney cartoons. On Youtube, most channels are shilling and they aren’t legally required to disclose this. You want full power? You need full responsibility. No “mistakes were made”. I’ve flagged things as literally toxic – nobody cares!

They are guilty of treason by acting as judge, jury and executioner, terms and conditions are NOT “enforced” because they are not a government. Nobody knows who they are, they are biased and nobody can vote them in/out. They are acting beyond their authority.

Internet access is a human right, it was proven in an EU court.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/innovation-industry/news/broadband-internet-access-will-become-a-legal-right-under-new-eu-telecoms-rules/

and the UN agreed

https://www.wired.com/2011/06/internet-a-human-right/

As in, “de-platforming” online is illegal. Equivalent to banning someone from a public park (speaker’s corner)!

Monopoly laws must be applied.

The world’s noosphere isn’t run by middle-class post-grad America.

They are just a platform, the power is with the people.

They’re scared of him, which will make more people listen, the morons.

Streisand Effect?

aka why hardly anyone links to me.

The best way to win on this is to push the classist angle.

They are. They’re keeping the lower orders in line. It’s all about classist brainwashing.

This isn’t like kicking a gadfly from a college class. That’s also technically illegal since they pay for the class.

You’re a utility, you can’t turn down anyone for service.

My electric can’t switch it off because they dislike my opinions on ketchup.

My water company can’t stop because my musical taste sickens them.

They are there to provide service. To serve. Censorship is illegal. Nobody signs up to be censored.

Social media FANG-type stock would collapse tomorrow if they couldn’t illegally handle your data and get away with it. PM/DMs/Email are privileged communications. If you’re speaking about medical issues over DM or to your lawyer by email, it is breaking privacy law (the human right) to scan or read it. They’re opening your letters.

Judging, editing, copying and/or banning it is…super-illegal.

They’re a public service. The Post Office doesn’t approve you for sending mail.

They serve the public. The public > Them.

Do you really think this info just stays in the companies? They don’t talk, compile hit lists, gossip to their friends about this one user?

Libertarian explains to socialist why taxation is theft

Owned.

It’s right there in the commandments not to steal and human rights not to enslave or force labour.

You Yankees miss out on some Youtube gold because you cba to read subtitles.

Toine Manders is the man. The Man.

You’d understand our European ways a lot better, including the passive-aggressive silences and interruptions. Socialists will play emotional appeal and if you use the magic words I don’t care (guilt-tripping is a form of abuse) and bring up the fact you have human rights over that fiddle noise, they will try to interrupt you. Do not let them. They give in pretty quickly and try to turn authorities against you, it’s all they can do.

Socialists are part of the Communist spectrum (halfway there) because it uses the force of a majority against productive people, it discriminates and punishes them for working hard. They stop or they die (murdered, see Little Black Book of Communism) because leftists do not believe in the right to self-determination. Just because someone was born X miles away from you does not entitle them to live off you. That is a dependent, you have rights over a dependent and adult ones have certain rights stripped.

What is sexual coercion? (hint: not consensual)

It’s a positive sign when the sluts and manwhores kvetch over this information getting out.

It’s a great way of outing rapists, like the vegan test. Just discuss rape by fraud and out pop the rapists.

Oddly they’ll talk about male rape as a red herring, when men are probably coerced as much as women based on porn myths i.e. men always want it.

These are your rights. Your right to personal sovereignty, physical power over your own body. They don’t want potential victims to know their rights.

Like, there’s nothing wrong with being a consumer, but purchasing stolen goods is still illegal. Fraud is always possible.

http://www.consented.ca/consent/coercion/
“It’s not that they did not say “no,” but that they could not say “no.””
People will happily admit duress is wrong, but make it something physical, than written… suddenly they argue it’s ‘complicated’ – no.

http://www.loveisrespect.org/content/what-sexual-coercion/

Or you could stop blaming the victim and simply bring back seduction law, which prevented some of the lesser-known forms of rape. (Because consent needs to be fully, truthfully informed).

Seduction is a form of abusive manipulation. It’s sick that society uses the term to mean something admirable.

Seduction is illegal under English common law. Simply enforce it.
Most of the American system is based on it too. Sinatra was charged with it.

Arguments for circumcision

In light of Germany realizing how barbaric it looks.

Because it is.

argumentscircumcision

Genital mutilation is evil.

I repeat: Genital mutilation is evil.

On a baby, an unconsenting little baby? Unspeakable evil.

Have you looked how much skin is removed? The ‘prepuce’ exists for evolutionary reasons, it’s like removing the eyelids but with far more nerves. Essentially, this punishes men for having sexual pleasure, it’s sick.

Comparing it to FGM is totally legitimate, and there is plenty of evidence for the damage, from what little has been collected. To say we can keep it because there’s insufficient evidence? That’s an appeal to ignorance, science and medicine work with the opposite logic of that.

We don’t conduct studies on why rape is evil, for ethical reasons. Doesn’t make it an acceptable violation of human rights, does it? There is no acceptable violation!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-considering-banning-circumcision-for-children-under-18s-a7459291.html

Boys should not be circumcised until they are old enough to choose for themselves, doctors in Denmark have said.

The Danish Medical Association said it had considered suggesting a legal ban on the procedure for children under the age of 18, because it believed circumcision should be “an informed, personal choice” that young men make for themselves.

If babies are considered consenting to anything an adult wants to do to them, there’d be no legal backing to imprison child rapists. Mull over that.

“We came to the conclusion that it is difficult to predict the consequences of a ban”

weaklings, putting politics and their career over doing what’s right

According to a major 2007 study by the World Health Organization, roughly 30 per cent of the global male population is circumcised.

Past polls have shown that upwards of 87 per cent of Danes support banning the practice on boys under the age of 18

JUST DO IT.

https://www.rt.com/news/341025-afd-germany-circumcision-ban/

While the majority backed bans on both Islamic and Jewish traditions including burkas, minarets, calls to prayer, and how animals are slaughtered, they cut out the proposal from Bavarian representatives to block the practice of snipping the tip of a baby boy’s penis.

A non-human animal is more important than baby boys? Seriously?

shock horror wtf omg no denial signs

Burn the world, Baby Jesus, just burn it all down pls

Leader Frauke Petry has said police should shoot at those who don’t have a “legal” right to be in the EU country.

Those are called invaders, hostile forces.

Guardian: All surrogacy is exploitation

I reference Broken Clock theory.

It seems some things are sacred.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/25/surrogacy-sweden-ban

No country allows the sale of human beings, so why is surrogacy still legal? Even if it’s ‘altruistic’, there’s a price to pay

Actually, Social Services get paid per child in this country.

forced-adoption.com/cashing-in

Forced adoption has another name, kidnapping.

There has been a total commodification of human life: click; choose race and eye colour; pay, then have your child delivered.

But three-parent embryos are fine? Make up your mind.

This week, Sweden took a firm stand against surrogacy. The governmental inquiry on surrogacy published its conclusions, which the parliament is expected to approve later this year. These include banning all surrogacy, commercial as well as altruistic, and taking steps to prevent citizens from going to clinics abroad.

This will indeed protect the women being exploited like a brood mare but also the poor children who would have been adopted into the cold arms of someone who refuses to provide them a family, yet the selfish people making this adoption decision in spite of a wealth of psychological evidence of harm are let off the hook? Adoption is not a wonderful, compassionate, beautiful thing – there are many cases of abuse from both ends and it is entirely financial as a decision and must be covered by the taxpayer in many cases otherwise nobody would take it on. Profiteering from child snatching is not kindness.

It is the new slavery, it treats human like chattel. Adoption and fostering are other immoral practices closely related, as a child has a legal human right to be with its kin, its blood, its biological family. You can’t have surrogacy without adoption, if one is immoral, so too the other.

Children’s human rights are, frankly, more important than any adult’s feelings on the subject.
Although of course their rationale is about using poor women for their bodies, which is also a good point, alas secondary.

Scientific paper on the depopulation efforts

http://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-subversion-of-medicine-and-public-health-by-international-securityprerogatives-2161-1165-1000208.php?aid=65519

h/t http://www.naturalnews.com/052750_engineered_genocide_depopulation_humanity_self-destruction.html

Medicine and public health are compromised by the highest echelons of science, industry and public administration for the geopolitical objectives of international cohabitation, preservation of resources, environmental conservation and decarbonization, all of which hinge on depopulation. Under the cover of reproductive health involuntary sterilizations are implemented throughout the developing world through adulterated vaccines, while in the developed world flu immunization programs weaken the immune systems of the old and civil servants to shorten lifespans and spare governments from meeting insolvent health care and pension plan obligations in the last stage of the demographic transition. Endocrine disruptors inserted in the basic elements of life to presumably prevent caries chronically subvert the human reproductive system to lower the total fertility rate of every country to replacement level. In the name of sustainable development, experimental carbon capture and sequestration methods as well as solar radiation management methods double as weapons against longevity by subjecting billions to unnaturally high exposure levels of heavy metals so the world’s decarbonization goals are tackled from two directions, by reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and increasing morbidity and mortality among the general population to proactively lower future emissions. Poverty and hunger are used as fronts for the deployment of GMO crops that purportedly increase yields, improve nutrition and require fewer fertilizers and pesticides, but that in fact misuse the latest bioengineering advances to cause subfertility, immune deficiencies and crop failures and thus lower the population by limiting births and increasing deaths. Unless stopped, this engineered genocide will damage the genetic and intellectual endowment of humanity and cause population collapse within 20 years, time during which the incidence and severity of NCDs will grow exponentially irrespective of health system investments and medical breakthroughs. Only a political solution can restore our health as individuals and as a civilization.

The feminists won’t touch forced sterilization programmes but the Guardian has reported on it.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/12/india-sterilisation-deaths-women-forced-camps-relatives
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/nov/10/un-examines-australias-forced-sterilisation-of-women-with-disabilities

And it happens here too thanks to the SS.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/mother-of-six-who-has-learning-difficulties-can-be-put-through-forced-sterilisation-rules-judge-10023496.html

A mother-of-six with learning difficulties can be lawfully forced to be sterilised by authorities to prevent further pregnancies, a judge has ruled.

Health officials and social services bosses made the request to force entry into her home and detain her with “necessary restraint” to be able to carry out sterilisation.

If the authorities don’t like you, they’ll call you disabled and sterilize you.

http://www.learningdisabilities.org.uk/help-information/learning-disability-a-z/l/204300/

Some examples of specific learning difficulties are:
  • Dyspraxia

  • Dyslexia

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

That’s right, we have legal precedent to sterilize practically anyone. On the basis of the opinion of government agents.