Paper: Dismantling the virus theory

Click to access Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf

Scientists must question everything and especially
what they love the most, i.e. their own discoveries
and ideas. This basic rule of scientific research helps
avoid erroneous developments and reveals the ones
that already exist. Also, we must all be allowed to
question the status quo, otherwise we would live in a
dictatorship.

but muh muh scientism! – redditfags

Moreover, science cannot be limited to a
selected number of institutions and experts. Science
can and must be conducted by anyone who has the
necessary knowledge and the appropriate methods.

Science can be considered science only if its claims are verifiable, reproducible and if they allow predictions. Science also needs external control, because, as we will see, a part of the medical sciences has lost touch with reality for quite some time.

They believe in invisible leprechaun atoms floating in nothing, popping out of existence. Also tiny strings. They can’t tell you what a field is. They’re mad, mad as hatters. But they make up equation models that can’t be verified and their real world studies make no sense. The world does make sense, they’re just wrong. It’s human error.

Square peg, they are wrong.

Anyone who has knowledge of biology and the genesis of life, of the development and functions of the tissue, of the body and of the brain, will automatically question the assumptions about viruses.

In the reality of the body and of its mechanisms, there is no place for hypothetical malignant processes.

You must be possessed. Tiny demons have besieged your body.

All biological processes, including those that can end in suffering, pain and death, are originally meant to be useful. A different approach to the virus phenomenon is possible and necessary: any layman with some background knowledge reading scientific papers about pathogenic viruses can realize that such viruses do not exist and what is being described are only typical components and characteristics of cells. This background knowledge will be provided in this article.

Remember, ebola is a virus. And they happened to have a vaccine, ready to go!

What ARE the odds?

It’s incredible, if not impossible.

Forget the delay of at least two years before you’re set for human trials, why can’t they do that process with every damn thing?

Biotech should be criminally accountable for with-holding cures, that’s all I’ll say. Currently, they are not.

They can also use corporate espionage and political contacts to with-hold funding from small competition who want a cure.

Inc. gems like:

The search for these pathogenic poisons remains to date fruitless, however, when bacteria were discovered, it was assumed that they were producing the pathogenic poisons. This supposition, called
“the germ theory”, was immediately accepted and remains very successful up to the present time.
This theory is so successful that the majority of the people are still not aware of the fact that the
so-called bacterial toxins are actually normal enzymes, which either cannot appear in a human
being, or, if they do, they never appear in such an amount as to make them dangerous.

….

Before it could be established that the “bacterial viruses” cannot kill natural bacteria, but they
are instead helping them to live and that bacteria themselves emerge from such structures, these
“phages” were already used as models for the alleged human and animal viruses. It was assumed
that the human and animal viruses looked like the “phages”, were allegedly killing cells and thereby
causing diseases, while at the same time producing new disease poisons and in this way transmitting
the diseases. To date, many new or apparently new diseases have been attributed to viruses if their origin is unknown or not acknowledged.

cough military cough

This reflex found an apparent confirmation in the discovery of the “bacterial viruses.

Don’t take the vaccine, unless you voted Hillary in which case go ahead sweetie. Take two.

Should we circumcise women to prevent throat cancer in men?

http://www.returnofkings.com/39017/should-we-circumcise-women-to-prevent-throat-cancer-in-men

I’m always amused by the exceptionalism of feminists.
One rule for you men, another for us women. Hate men? Of course not.
I’ve asked so many feminists a barometer question: would you sleep with an uncircumcised man? (i.e. natural!)
Their response was disgust, revulsion and mockery (aka foreskin shaming).

The sole logical explanation: all feminists are Orthodox Jews. In which case, premarital sex should be off the cards altogether.

Humans are still evolving. Duh.

article here;

“Historically, the birthing process has limited brain size, because babies’ heads had to fit through the birth canal.

Today, however, Caesarian sections circumvent that process. As many as 46 percent of babies born today in China are delivered via C-section, Pobiner said. With advances in fertility and better postnatal medical care, she asked, “Are we screwing with natural selection?” [DS: yes]

The world population is growing, and a bigger population also evolves faster, Pobiner said. But, with rising sea levels and less land available, waterborne and airborne illness could spread more easily [global plague], Pobiner said.

The largest virus ever found was a virus thawed from permafrost, known as Pithovirus. While this parasite doesn’t infect humans, what if other ancient viruses thaw out that are harmful? [then non-Europeans will die] For example, the smallpox virus was eradicated in 1979, according to the World Health Organization, but some experts say it has only been eradicated from the Earth’s surface, surviving instead in frozen form. [diseases evolve too]

And human evolution persists in other areas too, such as sexual selection. A recent study found that beards become more attractive when they’re rare in a population. When “peak beard” is reached, they become less attractive, the study found. Economic conditions may also influence beardedness, as unemployed men may use beards as a sign of masculinity, Pobiner said.”