Book: The Jews among the Greeks and Romans

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58245
Published by The Jewish Publication Society of America.
Isn’t that all of the publishers?

This is why you read the publication information.

Funny –

GREEK AND ROMAN CONCEPTS OF RACE

During the nineteenth century a peculiar rigidity was given to the conception of race through the application of somewhat hastily formed biological theories. One or another of the current hypotheses on heredity was deemed an adequate or even necessary explanation, and by any of them racial characteristics became determined, fixed: race was an unescapable limiting condition….

If by a peculiar rigidity you mean the concept of Darwinian evolution, sure.

Hastily formed biological theories is an oxymoron.

Theories are very well developed and Darwin used many species, all applied well on his taxonomy.

Now DNA (the ‘gene’ is a Darwinian theory) has been proven to exist so… he was right.

Genetic distance is very real, as real as concrete.

He theorized genes and now we can measure them.

There is no way to deny this without a gross denial of evolution itself.

“determined, fixed, limiting condition”

This is literally DARWINIAN INHERITANCE.

Biological determinism is 100% fact.

Two Asians cannot give birth to a European.

One Asian and one European cannot give birth to a European or an Asian. Their hybrid mongrel, much like a liger, will tend toward infertility and genetic disease. This includes psychiatric disease.

This even applies to cross-breeding plants and the associated fertility issues that entails. Former perennials can lose the ability to reproduce naturally. There is also a unique risk of weakness to disease and vitally, the parental unique DNA is lost.

You will not spontaneously mutate into a chimp.

http://pediaa.com/difference-between-cross-breeding-and-gmo/#Cross%20Breeding

“By the mating of two different breeds, a new organism can be produced with hybrid vigor. The hybrid vigor or heterosis is the tendency of the crossbred animal to exhibit the qualities superior to either parent. In animals, cross breeding is used to increase the production, longevity and fertility.”

False, a myth, even in dogs. Mongrels have many medical issues.

“exhibit the qualities superior to either parent”

Statistically false, due to regression to the mean.

We have extensively tested this in children, they are the mean of their parents.

https://www.nap.edu/read/10977/chapter/5

“This chapter explores the likelihood of unintended effects from diverse methods of genetic modification of plants and animals (see Operational Definitions in Chapter 1). Specifically, it discusses unexpected outcomes of breeding methods used to develop a food crop or strain and unexpected or unintended effects recorded in the scientific literature.”

BACKGROUND

Novel gene combinations arising from the genetic manipulation of existing genes through conventional breeding techniques may introduce unintended and unexpected effects. However, through the breeder’s selection process, the genetic lines that express undesirable characteristics are eliminated from further consideration, and only the best lines—those that express desirable characteristics with no additional undesirable agronomic characteristics, such as increased disease susceptibility or poor grain quality—are maintained for possible commercial release. Although plants and animals produced from conventional breeding methods are routinely evaluated for changes in productivity, reproductive efficiency, reactions to disease, and quality characteristics, they are not routinely evaluated for unintended effects at the molecular level. 

The clearing doesn’t happen in animals.

Cross breeding is known to be dangerous. If Hybrids had vigour they wouldn’t need that deliberate culling process.

In animals, their performance outcomes would be greater than the sum of their parents.

This never happens.

In humans, this would include IQ past both parents. Again, this never happens. We have plenty of negative evidence debunking this lie. At this point, it is a lie to make money.

They’re playing God.
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/plant_genetic_breeding

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/16922/why-are-hybrids-infertile

I guess if race doesn’t exist then the so-called Holocaust only happened to white people?

If they really want to claim there’s no such thing as race, there’s no such thing as a Jew.

So they have no group-level complaints.

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

Beige America?

You think I’m fucking with you, don’t you?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2015.1035145
Yes, a real study paper.

“This article examines the impacts of the race of the future theory on the U.S. population. By and large, the theory posits that the mixing of different races—due to the process of miscegenation, especially in marriage, cohabitation, or sexual relations—will blend all races, so much so that, in the future, the end result of this mixing will be a panracial formation (i.e., one race). In this analysis, the authors attempt to determine whether the mixing of colors currently happening in the United States will lead to one race and what the race of the future in the United States will “look” like.”

For once, I was not, in fact, fucking with you.

“One of the major conclusions is that, although the possibility of the existence of the race of the future has yet to be established, the degree of multiraciality in the U.S. population is rapidly growing (based on data and statistics from the U.S. Bureau of the Census).”

They’re planning this whether you like it or not.

Your tax monies fund this.

Behold your future, America.

Look long and hard. Such vigour!

Isn’t diversity your strength?

Aren’t you on the right side of history?

Don’t white people deserve to go extinct?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281431958_Race_of_the_Future_Mixing_of_Colors_in_the_United_States_Leading_to_One_Race

Simmer gently in a slowly boiling pan of fact.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/05/future-immigration-will-change-the-face-of-america-by-2065/
Remember, the most common nation to immigrate isn’t Mexico, it’s China!

Welcome to Asian-majority America. I’m sure you’ll be treated well.
They’re so nice to dogs.

The projected rise of Asians as the nation’s largest immigrant group has its own implications, among them potentially increased education levels. Among immigrants who arrived within the past five years, Asians already outnumber Hispanics, in part because of a sharp recent drop in immigration from Mexico.

This is from 2015.

This slowed Hispanic immigration also will have a longer-term impact: In 2065, Asians will outnumber Hispanics among all immigrants – 38% to 31%. (Today those shares are 26% and 47%.)

The increased share of Asian immigrants among all immigrants means that education levels of the foreign-born population could rise sharply, because Asian immigrants tend to be better educated. Among recent immigrants from Asia, for example, 57% have completed college, compared with 13% for recent Mexican immigrants and 28% for immigrants from other Central or South American nations.

Worship your new supposed high IQ rulers, don’t question it!

The rise of the Asian share of the immigrant population also could have implications for the political debate about immigration over the next 50 years. Americans today have mixed views about the impact of immigrants on society, but tend to have more favorable views of Asian (and European) immigrants than other groups, according to a recent Pew Research survey.

Other white guys are rolling over for some soypussy*, so you should too!

The survey also found that most Americans (56%) would prefer giving priority to immigrants who are highly educated (or highly skilled), compared with 37% who favor giving priority to those with family in the U.S.

Cucks. You can train your own people.

(and *soy sauce makes white men fat, sorry to tell you this)

https://www.ketodomain.com/keto-food-info/soy-sauce-safe-keto/

“Soy sauce also contains phytoestrogens. Phytoestrogens mimic estrogen in the body.”

http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/natural/phytamt2.htm
Phytoestrogen levels in various soy products study measurements.

Asian women with tits have just faked it by eating tons of (GMO) soy. That isn’t genetic, note the facial masculinity.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/neotony-isnt-an-asian-thing/

Transsexuals consume it for this purpose too.

https://feminizationsecrets.com/male-to-female-feminine-foods/

Health risks in mixed race children

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

Hybrid vigour, right?

Results. Mixed-race adolescents showed higher risk when compared with single-race adolescents on general health questions, school experience, smoking and drinking, and other risk variables.

Conclusions. Adolescents who self-identify as more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks. The findings are compatible with interpreting the elevated risk of mixed race as associated with stress.

Might’ve already posted it but who cares?

It’s still real.

Still trying to pin it on nurture, I see.

Outbreeding depression

There need to be more studies on this but I know scientists are busy with buttered toast experiments and rating their own farts.

This is the genetic thing you never hear about, despite everyone and their purebred* dog knowing about inbreeding depression.
Hybrid vigour doesn’t even apply to modern wheat.

And hybrid is misused.

I saw this explanation:

A hybrid is a cross between two closely related strains such as an Arab and a Jew or a Swede and a Spaniard. A mongrel is a cross between different races such as a Mulatto, a Mestizo, a Eurasian, etc.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123847195000733

Positive outbreeding studies are conducted on flies.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024081416729

…I don’t even, insects are already heavily inbred by default so outbreeding isn’t really possible.

Outbreeding depression is more of an issue than inbreeding (some inbreeding is good for a gene pool, the most fertile and healthy couple combinations and normal historically), which is fixed by breaking the pattern for a few generations. However, you cannot undo outbreeding depression in part due to its novelty. It’s easy to add, impossible to take away.
http://www.vortex10.org/Lacy/Reprints/FrankhamConsBiol2011.pdf

Actually it’s the combination of genes that makes the organism unfit.
(The fact of lower parental singular quality aside, two mutts won’t make a prize dog).

Its ideal environment doesn’t exist. In any other environment, it’s defective.
In the race for life, they’re disabled. It’s like mixing wines, they lose their distinctive character but other examples haven’t. In a competition…

Easy example:

One nose selection gene for cold weather, one selection for hot.
Result: poorly adapted child for either.

*They care about the dog’s bloodline more than their grandkids, who will hate their guts.

Racial realities, mixed race fertility and Neanderthals

Hope you poured a drink you could prop a spoon in.

I found stuff by accident again.

http://www.academia.edu/542911/Neanderthal-human_hybrids

Neanderthal women couldn’t conceive with humans.

Different species.

It would be interesting to see if there are fertility problems between races…

I thought.
Google autocompletes “are mixed race less fertile”
Interesting.

Rumours that Asians and Africans have more trouble with IVF, even among those who already need IVF.

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/business-transparency/freedom-of-information/what-can-i-request/previous-foi-requests/health-and-social-care/information-regarding-mixed-race-parentage/index.html

Infertility information isn’t gathered, which sounds weird for a data-mining project???
They collect the differing types of data but somehow can’t put them together? I call BS.

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html
Cavalli-Sforza’s genetic distances.
I knew HBD would have the answer.

“It is almost the equivalent to having twice the number of children… Thus assortative mating by ethnicity can have large fitness benefits, the largest derived from choosing mates within geographic races.”

they pass on more of themselves, less genetic death per carrier (child)
May increase the values for Ks in parental investment theory.

“In other words and general terms, a white mother will be almost as twice as closely related to a child with a white father versus a child with a black father.”

Bear in mind, this isn’t opinion. It’s genetic.

“But when I turn to the mirror in my bedroom to admire us together, I am shocked. She seems so alien.”
LOL
The non-white always benefits far in excess due to dominating the white phenotypes.
They’re hoping to reduce their mutation load/disease risk. The white party loses.

“But still, I can’t shake off the feeling of unease. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter… When she was born, pale but with lots of dark hair, I asked the midwife if her eyes would stay blue. ‘Asian genes are very strong,’ she said in what I took to be an ominous tone. No more Brady Bunch kids for me. The midwife has been proved right and every day my baby’s eyes get a little darker.””

Wow so Nazi to insist your daughter look like you. /s
WTF do these r-types expect?

“Since parents share fewer genes with mixed-race children, people involved in interracial marriages are short-changing their own genes, which might explain why people engaged in mixed-race relationships often tend to have lower mate value.”

oh yeah
they signal how they can’t get one of their own so they settled
we all know how attractive desperation is, socially and sexually

“In general, mixed-race people have more health problems.”
The hybrid vigour thing was always a lie, it’s reduced fitness.
According to the field of medicine.

In other words, an argument could be made that mixed-race families are maladaptive — both for the parents and the children — and undermine one’s genetic interests. As noted by various commenters, multiracial families often do not possess the harmony, cooperation and purposefulness of same-race families, because mixed-race families lack the focus of genetic investment and returns that same-race families possess.”

Like a kind of …selection…

White British genes best at IVF *hums national anthem*

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160818212907.htm
“The study also found that some groups of women including South Asian Bangladeshi, Black African, Middle Eastern, have a significantly lower number of eggs collected than White British women.”
weeaboos lament
“Furthermore, the increased prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in south Asian women may have an impact on egg quality and lower implantation rates.”
“The data suggests that ethnicity is a major independent factor determining the chances of IVF or ICSI treatment success.”
No shit Sherlock. Could it be something of a biological thing going on here…?
“While the reason for this association is difficult to explain, the potential factors could be the observed differences in cause of infertility, ovarian response, fertilisation rates and implantation rates, which are all independent predictors of IVF success.”
Difficult? Awkward.
“”Infertility affects 10-15% of the population and more people are seeking fertility treatment.”
Isn’t that approaching the rate of mixed race couples? Coincidence, I’m sure. I’d like to check but nobody gives enough of a damn about them to collect the data.
“The reasons behind the variation need to be looked at in more detail but in the future could potentially help improve success rates amongst all groups of women.””
Not if it’s genetic.

Another study!
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131029220758.htm
“live birth rates of ethnic women were significantly lower”

White women healthiest post-birth
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130211102222.htm
almost like an evolved advantage…

Disgust toward mixed-race couples at biological level
https://phys.org/news/2016-08-bias-disgust-mixed-race-couples.html
“”That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level,” Skinner said.”
“Participants were quicker to associate interracial couples with non-human animals and same-race couples with humans.”
lol
do you ‘fucking love science’ now?

Mixed race babies weaker babies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
“contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth”
it’s healthy! they tell you
only because they aren’t collecting the data to argue otherwise
I would sue because that’s academic neglect and actual systemic racism.

You really have to search even for data on successful births, then there’s NO fitness advantage by rate.
http://paa2012.princeton.edu/papers/122287
“This paper investigates whether mixed race couples have different or same fertility level than same race couples”
“Same race couples have on average 1.93 children while mixed couples have 2.05 children. Same race couples have lower fertility because the majority of those couples are white. This data shows that homo and heterogamous unions do not have the same fertility level”
“Mixed race couples have fertility levels that fall in between same race couples; not as high as black or brown couples but not as low as the white couple.”
Regression to the mean, my old friend.

Ya gotta really LOOK.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/obgyn/pregnancy/11111
Oh look, mutation load.

https://www.quora.com/Is-it-harder-for-interracial-couples-to-conceive
“I can’t find any studies on this at all.”
Red flag to ANYONE else?
“I heard from student of medicine that interracial couples could have problem conceiving child because of their racial differences.”
Why not study it?
They’re screwing over the mixed-race kids.
Possibly killing them, in the long run. That’s just sick, not to study it. Parents deserve to know.

The manosphere dudes with Yellow Fever won’t be pleased.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2008/10/the-prenatal-wages-of-interracial-relationships/
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-10/sumc-acf092508.php
“In both of these cases there isn’t something mystical going on; God is not smiting those who are sinning by crossing racial lines. Human spontaneous abortion rates are high. Much of this might be due to mother-child immune system responses. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that people from very genetically distinct populations have very different immune profiles. …”
It does if they grow up hearing everyone is biologically equal.
There is some data which might suggest that genetic relatedness increases reproductive fitness, possibly because of reduced risk of immune incompatibilities between mother and fetus when the father is more closely related to the mother. It stands to reason then that as the father becomes more genetically distant the likelihood of incompatibilities might increase. All of this means that genes matter, and they matter in ways we can possibly predict.”

Then predict.

Do the science.

Your JOB.

http://brembs.net/hamilton/
Irony, the name.
K-selected cooperation in a formula.

Inbreeding is generally better than outbreeding due to inclusive fitness.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088844/
applies to other species too
As long as you don’t screw close relations and over many generations, you’re fine.

Wasps! That’s the depth of the barrel I scrape for data on this. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear!
https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/22/2/337/208104/Reproductive-skew-is-highly-variable-and
Because for some reason nobody takes the data in humans.
Some strange, open-minded reason.
They find cooperation. In insects.

Needs more genetics, more studies. Generally correct.

Link: Does race-mixing increase physical attractiveness?

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/893/

“Leroi and Razib need to understand that in so far as physical attractiveness related to a genetic constitution associated with better canalization of development and developmental stability is concerned, mixed-race individuals are expected to be, on average, worse off than individuals with little other-race genetic admixture.  Razib may mention hybrid vigor (offspring better than parents, overall, on average) and ignore the possibility of what appears to be more likely—which I will elaborate on in the future: outbreeding depression (offspring worse than parents, overall, on average).”

Give that man a cookie. Good read. Quite detailed, not long enough.

Imho, this woman has retained her Anglo-features, a better study would be to look at her genome (and others of mixed race) and see which % they inherited from each of their parents, and of these, how many dominant features from the races considered lower on the general attractiveness scales (to put it PC for once).


Source: majorityrights.com/images/uploads/newsweek.jpg

Although Indian features are easy to spot in profile (mostly in the nasal projection and an inverted bridge curve). The women can be quite beautiful if they have a small nose e.g. Aishwarya Rai, with Nord-European coloration of the eyes but typical puffy ‘pillow’ lips.
Actually, it’s quite funny to trace the European coloration by hair color. It works very well as a predictor. Southern Europe is largely black-dark brown with a smoother thicker texture, mid-Europeans, as England for example, have medium-light brown with a fine wave texture, and the uppermost Nordic countries have the highest percentages of blonde, with medium thickness and often curls. Although there is a scatter of darker blondes in England, for instance, and redheads are exactly where you would expect, in Ireland, mid-European level. The isolation of Ireland preserved their recession and many papers have predicted the redhead will die out in a century or two.

Certainly, white people have the most visual variation in colour of any race, since we hit the entire scale. I’ve noted the rare mixed race women who are truly beautiful (most, contrary to media stereotype, have an unnatural combination of features bordering on creepy/uncanny valley), they mute the more dominant features of the less pleasing parentage within a distinctly European bone structure (I’m trying to be polite). Pics or it doesn’t happen, right?

The stunning Vanessa Williams proves my point more than words ever could.

However, such women are the exception of the mixed, incredibly rare, not the rule. Hollywood has tried to pass these creatures off as the norm. And it’s unfair to hold them to a single race’s standard, I think the movement to have a mixed classification in its own right is the …fair move (sorry).

This woman puts it better.
https://nicolamarven.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/mixed-race-people-are-not-beautiful/

All this makes me physically cringe from the screen.  What are they doing?  Don’t they realise the damage they’re causing by perpetuating this beautiful little brown baby bullshit? Oh! What lovely end-products of interracial social cohesion!  It’s as bad as a Channel 4 programme I once saw made by an anxious middle-class Asian mother.  She was eager to prove that the product of her marriage with a white English man would not be inferior, and so went around to scientists and researchers getting them to say stupid things about how mixed-race people might be smarter or have more symmetrical faces.  What a load of mul(atto) poo.  It’s as bad as phrenology.  It’s actually – ironically – racist.  And yes, of course you can be racist against mixed-race people.  The thing is though, we’re unlikely to have a cohesive voice to shout back at you but, brilliantly, because we’re as mixed-up as your teenage daughter’s underwear drawer, you can’t get out of it.  There’s no “Oh but I can’t be racist against them because I’m X or Y or have Z as a friend” crap.  Bad luck loser, we’re EVERYTHING.  There’s no hiding. Time to confront your own messed-up xenomania.

I like this woman. She’s honest.

We’re not products.  We’re people.  And some people are ugly.  Some people are really ugly. Some black people are ugly, some white people are ugly, some frickin Filipineseafrojafaican people are ugly.  Why should the racial mixing suddenly make people beautiful?  What is beautiful anyway?  It’s got nothing to do with race.  Saying mixed-race people are more beautiful than others is the WORST thing you can do for the mixed-race community.

It’s too much pressure for any race. I think each group should have its own beauty standards e.g. T or A or L, without feeling the need to compete on something largely gifted at birth.

Hybrid vigour is indeed a racist caricature, derived from comparing slave humans to horse breeds (they wanted the better workers so ‘bred’ their slaves together, arranging marriages, for more muscular men, for instance). Thankfully, as I’ve covered, hybrid vigour is a myth, in fact the evidence suggests a single instance of truly outbreeding (ancestors from two completely separate continents, neighbouring countries are fine), as it’s called, is as bad in general as generations of inbreeding (two to three generations during famine produces little difference or most of Europe would be thick).

Do you see what I mean about the Uncanny Valley though? The PC way to put it is an alarming tendency toward the … evolutionally novel. They look like they don’t fit.

A standard of their own would be fitting and better for a healthy sense of esteem without treading on toes.

“You think these things because these women are not seen The Other.  They are not seen as their race, they are just seen as women.”

applause all around hiddleston

Exactly, just because the science suggests one thing in theory is no excuse to be bitchy to one another IRL. You do you.
They had no control over it, it’s their parents fault (Eurasian men are especially bitter about this) and it’s each human’s duty to make the best of the beauty hand they were dealt.

Update: listen, we can’t all be Nutan. Consider how many Indians had to breed to get to a woman who looks suspiciously white (dormant genes exist – epigenetics).

nutan beauy

The Latina beauty standard is actually Spanish, which is a mixture of pampered English skin, French manners and Italian looks. Before Coco Chanel held us to male field labourer standards… thanks, you anorexic Nazi-fucking whore. I don’t want to see a 12yo painted orange and dressed in drag. That’s no role model.

The sheer majority of mixed race propaganda is all Italian in description. Dark, glossy hair, a tan and curves. This is rare, even in Europe.

that's enough stop please karen will and grace

I mean, I can fit it, so thank you, but also fuck you guys for implying there’s anything wrong with blondes with green eyes. It’s harsh and uncalled for.