The recent history of PC censorship

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com

He also sells the book through official channels, which would be nice to buy if you like the material.

It’s also easier to read than this free version.

Contents page for a taste;

Contents (of paper version)

Why I use the term Political Correctness, instead of Liberalism or Socialism? …………………………………………………………………………i
Introduction……………………………………………………………………. iii
Political correctness no longer a joke… ………………………………… 1
Escape from habituation into nihilism …………………………………… 2
The irrationality of PC ……………………………………………………….. 7
Imaginary enemies preferred……………………………………………….. 9
Why is PC so shallow, flippant and reckless? ……………………….. 12
Political correctness, the intellectual elite and the mass media …. 15
The mass media and the memory hole …………………………………. 17
Fashion and PC ………………………………………………………………. 20
Old Left – New Left ………………………………………………………… 22
Nature of modern mass media ……………………………………………. 25
Mass media as social cognition ………………………………………….. 28
The immunity of PC to reason …………………………………………… 29
PC depends on both the mass media and an intellectual elite …… 31
The impossibility of neutrality …………………………………………… 32
The proper question – whom to favour? ………………………………. 35
Assuming neutrality is impossible ………………………………………. 37
Good causes and good intentions ……………………………………….. 39
The moral exemplar of PC ethics ……………………………………….. 41
Is anybody safe? ……………………………………………………………… 43
Safety for victim group members ……………………………………….. 46
Life as a supervised game …………………………………………………. 47
What matters most – PC or societal function? ………………………. 49
Virtue in political correctness = altruism, un-selfishness…………. 52
Disinterested altruism and moral superiority ………………………… 56
The insanity of pure abstract altruism………………………………….. 59
Immune to evidence ………………………………………………………… 61
Indifference to outcomes ………………………………………………….. 63
Takeover by the PC elite – ten summary points …………………….. 65
Not fundamentally egalitarian, after all ……………………………….. 70
The definition of happiness under PC………………………………….. 73
The Principle of Inversion ………………………………………………… 74
PC Utopia ……………………………………………………………………… 76
Atomic individuals, atomic acts …………………………………………. 77
All groups seen as interest groups ………………………………………. 78
PC-favoured groups are assumed to be weak and controllable …. 80
PC not fundamentally „multicultural‟ ………………………………….. 82
Orthodox religion is immune to PC incentives ……………………… 84
PC as a Christian heresy …………………………………………………… 86
Western civilization cannot be saved…………………………………… 89
The millennium-deep roots of political correctness ………………… 91
Could resurgent nationalism save Western civilization from PC? 94
Characteristics of a new secular nationalism ………………………… 99
Could a party of „common sense‟ replace political correctness? 103
CS v PC ………………………………………………………………………. 105
What is The Good? ………………………………………………………… 109
Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good … 114
The Good versus The Better ……………………………………………. 117
Can the desire to end suffering be the primary motivation? ……. 119
The world is not enough …………………………………………………. 122
Can‟t we simply subtract PC from modernity? ……………………. 124
PC and „original sin‟ ………………………………………………………. 126
Faith in abstract systems …………………………………………………. 128
Why don‟t you convert to political correctness? ………………….. 131
How to be non-PC …………………………………………………………. 134
Postscript …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Note to the reader ………………………………………………………….. 137

I bolded the recently-relevant topics, he isn’t called paranoid now!

Oh, but this well-researched, well-written book was published before SJWAL and the guy’s actually white and really academic, with a history of contribution in academia, so don’t be surprised you somehow never heard of it among the so-called red pill / woke / alternative / whatever internet that totally isn’t controlled opposition.

Totally.

I’m sure they just forgot to mention it at the apropos moments for half a decade.

As it was all coming to fruition.

Epigraph

This book is intended for normal, mainstream, secular, modern, disaffected and alienated intellectuals; those who are complicit in political correctness (as are all intellectuals) but who are (when not distracted, drugged or dreaming) in a state of despair.

This book will, I hope, help such people to understand their condition, and present the likely choices. It will not help them to save their world (too late for that) but it may help them to save their souls.

I’m sure they just “forgot”.

You cannot understand the nature of the Beast without this book, it truly is fundamental.

Tagging as QAnon because it explains social media censorship.

A point about the Conservative cucks who want to keep the Sexual Revolution (so recent it’s in living memory).

People can only get away with this absurd claim to be defending Western Civilization (get away with it in their own minds, as much as the public arena) because Western Civilization is so obviously collapsing so fast and the perception that what will come after is probably going to be miserable for most people; and because this degeneration is being accelerated by an evil, blind and insane politically correct elite who apparently must be opposed – somehow – although with little chance of short-term success.

Blind? No, they have a giant eye.

Never attribute to stupidity what has a centuries-long trail of proof leading to malice.

What else are we supposed to believe? Year on year, it coincidentally went their way?

Trump’s victory triggers the brainwashed because in Hollywood, only the good win. If they win, they must be the good guys.

But the Secular Right is trying to keep its cake and to eat it: to retain the residual and declining bits of modernity, the counter-currents that it personally values (especially sexual freedom); but at the same time to dispense with PC – and PC is now the mainstream and dominant flow of modernity.

To kill PC in all its sprouting Hydra heads, you’d need to kill the body of what it protects.

Bye bye sexual “freedom” as the price of civility.

If you want civilization, the decadence has gotta die.

Austerity was previously Labour’s policy for a reason.

I’d like to thank Planned Parenthood for Trump’s November victory. Without their tireless work to murder leftists, this push-back wouldn’t be possible. Abortion has replaced pandemic as a culling force in human populations.

Logically the insane degenerates deluded enough to feel entitled to both a virgin and a whore (and therefore, terrible marriages as they romance the mistress and deprive the wife with emotional abandonment) would immediately cause a severe shortage of women a la India, to say nothing of the women who’d reject the system and swear off men entirely. This is why the desires of weak-willed men don’t determine history or society, they can only destroy.

100% – 20% religious, spinster, 40% virgin probable child bride, 40% whore  or if they wanted more variety, using up the best women thus 70% whore, 30% bride and slaughtering women who rejected the slavery of forced unions.How quickly before the birth rate turns into an Indian sinkhole, like all the savage groups who did this in history before?

And they try to appeal to Darwin about this? Or moral superiority? What about all the abortions required by that system?

Kindly, there’d be at least a 25% shortage of women. What happens to the men? You can’t draft them, they won’t go or they’ll rebel or be useless. Now you’re overthrown by the shit-tier of your own sex. Like India.

AKA the guys who think they’d be better off in that society, not of the shit-tier themselves, aren’t smart either.

1 man for 1 woman is the best system and natural to this species.

As it is, a mutated flu of some sort would shortly dispatch most sluts, whatever their claimed politics, in the world. It doesn’t have to be purely an STD to be transmitted through close physical proximity (although it could combine with HPV’s genes). I don’t worry about them. They’re dead men walking. And contributing to the very drug resistance that might’ve saved them. The Lord does work in mysterious ways.

K-shifting majority

Propaganda has its limits.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36982/new-book-more-80-americans-reject-pc-culture-emily-zanotti

They should study spiral of silence on social media and classist attitudes to the poor in “caring” Democrats.

We’ve lost a sense of dignity in society and the idea of the inappropriate. Some etiquette must come back e.g, talking about your sex life is repugnant, people don’t want to know, much like bowel functions. Bragging about bodily functions is the lowest of the low. It’s subhuman when the only thing you can talk about is animal impulses. Politics is disgusting normal people.

When you normalize conversations and pre-watershed depictions of degeneracy, it will get worse. Look at “music”, it’s basically an audio book of porn now. Bring back the film and TV code, please. It isn’t censorship because people can seek it out online. Society must have standards.

Why are there no age restrictions on products e.g. porn and smartphones? There’s a wealth of evidence of addiction.

Identity politik

http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/electoral-gold-for-the-stupid-party-the-anti-anti-white-vote/

Still feeling a need to signal, in spite of what’s already happened? Plato’s natural slaves I see.

Still, they refuse to mention pathological altruism.

Name the bloody beast. Or it’ll kill you.

Ah, but then they’d need to give credit to the female author of the book on it.

There’s your real Peterson level academic.

Why the anti-Semite row?

People aren’t rolling over like dogs any more.

An observation, Jews will have to earn their position like everyone else.

The Torah Party has always been Jewish since it was neocon (globalism gives it away).

The media barrage is useful.

  1. they might move
  2. they’ll stop personally cucking
  3. they’ll understand they painted themselves into a corner by importing groups who speak on Speaker’s Corner about wanting to murder them
  4. they might have to pay their fucking taxes
  5. their own schools are finally being over-run with Cultural Marxist propaganda and failing inspections for rejecting it
  6. since the media is telling them and know they own the media (wink) they’ll believe it
  7. identity politics gets more entrenched because they wanted it
  8. they started it and won’t be allowed to switch course
  9. tactically, it will be openly rigged as a 2-party system between two religions hostile to the native culture
  10. while enjoying its luxuries
  11. people will notice
  12. The Israelis are scared of a fight, they don’t want to risk anything to defend their existence. They have to fund weapons to stay as far away from the front line as possible.
  13. That national character will become a more extreme aversion to real conflict (r).  Triangulation will be employed to make us fight their battles. It won’t work.
  14. if it becomes Muslims v. Jews, let them rip one another apart, none of us care
  15. they can choose to pick up their middle eastern conflict
  16. we don’t even want Jerusalem, it’s a shit-hole
  17. third party systems that actually serves the producers will come in
  18. we have numbers
  19. questions are being asked about undeserved, unchecked power, good!
  20. we’re all equal, so they must answer to the rest of us.

Let it go, let it go….

Anti-nationalist against anti-nationalist.

We’re supposed to care?

Anti-social versus anti-social.

Either way, we all win. They aren’t children what do we owe them? They have many places they can go. The Jews can go to Israel, the Muslims most places, if they feel hard done by. While the rest of us have to cultivate the roots here.

These people hate us. Their religion tells them it’s virtuous.

Why intervene? They have so much social power, they can do it themselves.

The working class infantry won’t march in since you abandoned them.

The foot soldiers have deserted the shitty generals.

“Fight your own damn war!”

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” – Napoleon

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2018/05/the-nomad-moves-on.html

Da Wimminz

1,900 words. Good ones. Get a drink.

Only a weak man blames women for inaction.
A decent one knows the man should act for himself.

We could point out many things in a democracy, as a majority.

Considering most violent crimes are conducted by men, I don’t think you’d like it.

The broflakes are too sensitive.
Strangely, the ‘war on women’ has become real. The men who reject their role to lead society or defend anyone, even themselves, point to their genetic kin and cry ‘lazy’. Ah, projection.

It’s da wimminz fault!

No.

You still have to grow up, Peter Pan.
The libertarian arguments (and libertarianism) for multiculturalism/cheap labour, protrude from male corners. All-male corners. Your own sex betrayed you, and you betrayed yourselves in the cowardice to admit this fact.

Where to blame?

It’s either generational, for varying reasons of voting cycle and cultural change or it’s civic. Pro- or the anti-social. Men and women need one another to survive. You’re not just shooting yourself in the foot, but the balls.
Losers notwithstanding.
Men evolved on average for certain tasks, expecting them is not “gynocentrism”, pushed by a bitter Boomer divorcee, it’s the dimorphic specialization of evolutionary biology. It keeps society functional. Biology prefers the life-giving sex, before humans came along.

If you want gender roles, start with yourself.

So-called men say childbirth is nothing to a kick, but don’t want medical advances to do the easy job of growing and carrying to term. Uhuh. Easier than a pod though, isn’t it? Actually possible.

I notice men aren’t willing to bear and raise their own children. Too painful?
You might have to go out less with the boys? #lostboys
Stefan M seems pretty happy in his marriage, Elam’s just sore his marriage sucked. It sucked because he was the one who chose it, directed it (as the male party) and ruined it.

Like some people can’t drive, some people shouldn’t marry.

People treat pop culture like Bible studies too. That disturbs me. Fandom philosophy BS.
Crying into a camera won’t change the world. Teaching the truth about it… a formidable enemy. Truth does not equal conspiracy. We know how shitty this world is, we live here. What works, what came before, what was goodness and why.

You teach principles – logical/moral/legal/historical, you nag with opinions.
And don’t make the classic error of acting like America = Teh World.

Identity politics for men, white men especially, will never work.
Why? It’s like a poker player with the best hand complaining it could be better.
They’re spoiled brats. The Charlottesville lot in their gay little shorts weren’t working class were they? They weren’t out producing anything of worth to society (oh, that looks like the terrifying specter of hard work!). No women either, they didn’t forget they had obligations. Family > Race. (see end) You can’t help anyone unless you self-care and build up yourself as a rock first. You have no authority to draw upon. You’re like the trust fund baby champagne socialists of the left. Lazybones, the lot of yer.
Look around and grow some perspective you accuse everyone else of lacking.

1.It’s not about you.

2.Compared to everyone else, you’re doing really well. Crap is the new normal.

Why aren’t more women in politics? You don’t want us there?

You complain about suicide rates. Isn’t that a choice? Isn’t there a ‘retirement plan’ around that decision? If it’s so terrible, and you suddenly value the human soul, shouldn’t it be a crime again, along with abortion? Or is killing an unborn man acceptable?

You need to be consistent or don’t be shocked nobody listens.
What is the way to win here, for men and women? What do you actually want? How does a functional society operate? Envisaging oppression and systemic slavery of women to get hard about won’t work, has never been real (send proof otherwise), we’ll simply stop working, the economy will grind to a halt because most white women aren’t ghetto trash supporting 4 kids by 3 babydaddies. But for supporting ourselves, like adults, you still insult us. WTF do you want? To bitch. That’s all. Useless bitches.

Women in the workplace was fine, for many centuries. (nb. American history isn’t the only history for white people). The problems started with various types of immigration, which were and remain, largely male. If you’d side with a foreign man over white women, don’t pretend to care for “our” interests. Immigration drove wages down, if you look it up. Women were responsible for economic growth, including wage growth. At the very least, husbands could afford to work longer hours if they knew the woman was running the house, a form of labour. America wouldn’t have won WW2 if its women didn’t work. If a man wants to be a stay at home father because he’s good at it, an outlier, why not? Where is your meritocracy while you whine about freedoms?

Consistency! Your American Dreams for consistency!

Your Independence Day is a joke, your country went to the dogs after you booted out your white kin from power for a melting pot social experiment. ..Can a welfare-dogged society really be called independent?

Why are women statistically more clinically depressed? Men do not listen to reason.

That is the definition of stupid.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/stupid

Having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

Hiveminds stagnate. Don’t take on low IQ muh dicks or your movement dies.

Whataboutism re men is also invalid. It’s changing the subject, derailing is an indicator of someone without an argument. You don’t actually want to discuss problems women have, you expect them to magically go away if you ignore them, like the politicians we despise.

Common one?

Workplace deaths are higher, choosing dangerous fields higher, recklessness, higher.

#notanargument

Those are choices.

You are not soldiers, you are not coal-miners, you are ineffectual crybabies riding the coat-tails of your ancestors who can do nothing but whine like a snowflake that you’re too special to try like the rest of us (inc. women) and that, in spite of living in the Easiest Society Ever, in history, you have still failed to be an adult.

The problems of white women are also white problems, equally valid as the men’s.

You want our support? Ya gotta cooperate with the other members of your group.

Our mutual enemies delight in seeing white men throw their women under the bus. It’s probably a terrorist bus too. The group you need to survive is the one you should never turn on. If you’re a, what’s the term, “race traitor”, or if you’re a “genetic suicide”, you never cared, you just want a soapbox. Born with the other set of genitals, you’d be a fully paid up SJW.

Hm, why don’t women (the biologically, heavily investing sex) want to have children in the age of abusive/cheating/deadbeat husbands/fathers? In the anti-natal culture that offers abortion as soon as you’re told you’re pregnant because it’s assumed the father doesn’t want to raise it and lauds minors as fuckbuddies on the Pill whoring themselves out for drinks and impoverished mistresses known as ‘side chicks’? Before cuckoldry became a popular, pomo fetish, there were plenty of cuckqueans. Women didn’t like it much either. Yes, adultery is wrong! What was the demographic of the Ashley Madison hack again? Yes, it should be punished.

With harsher divorce laws. Why are you even allowed to re-marry when you broke a vow, you can’t renege on student loans but you can abandon your family? WTF is that America? Women file for divorce more often…. but why? The head of the house-hold is a failure. Go ahead, protect marriage. You’d be protecting everyone, but everyone includes women. If you hate/blame women that much, that makes us a scapegoat. Scapegoats are innocent by definition.

Who causes most of the problems, mathematically? You never ask that. Poor baby.

Never dare…

Sexual disgust is far higher in which sex? Women.

…So which sex is degenerate? Men.

Backed by, oh, I dunno, paraphilia studies? Pedophilia studies? Rape data? Basically all of the data we have? Continue to deny reality, because it hurts your egocentric quest to Fix the World without working on yourself and your atrocious impulse control.

Why don’t women with their heads screwed on wanna breed with a man who won’t Man Up?

It’s a MYSTERY, guys.

When men fail their role, women quit the game too! Astounding!

And, if men don’t owe women their finances if they don’t want to marry, why do women supposedly “owe” sex? And how pathetic is it to be a pity fuck, on the subject of ego-trips? An AA orgy for omega men too proud to just masturbate and accept they’re undesirable specimens. You want ladies, in society? Well, they won’t be your whores then, and if you expect otherwise, there’s something wrong with you. Standards do not a ‘bitch’ make. Be consistent.

Which came first, the men fucking around since time immemorial without adequate Biblical consequences, or the Sexual Revolution where more women did it too? Where was the mistake?

Double standards are meaningless. Societies collapse in chaos. If a rich man can shoot you but you can’t shoot him…. well…. isn’t that what’s happening? To interpret Darwin in bad faith is a naturalistic fallacy. Men are not like other animals, they are meant to control themselves.

On Peterson, the little troll.

Clean your room is misunderstood as a meme. Take responsibility when the fault lies with you. Women imitate the moral calibre of their men. You done fucked up, sons.

The meme you blindly love? I didn’t explain it on purpose before. Was funny watching idiots parrot it, oblivious to the fact it was intended for them.

It’s a reference to a proverb, well-known in England;

Sweep before your own door ~John Ray, English Proverbs, p. 135 (1678)
http://forum.quoteland.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/99191541/m/1151077311

translation.

You are responsible for yourself and those you take on (wife and kids, the commitment part??) not some weasel word saving the world bullshit. You can’t save jack shit if you can’t save yourself.

And hypothetically, in a thought experiment, let’s say women were weak, like children.

Is punching down at children acceptable in a civilized society? Ya feel manly?

Cucks are bad, cowards are worse. Men cause many of society’s problems and also are the sex to typically resolve them with society’s graces, historically. Sadly, tragically, historically.

We can deal with Sharia. We can deal with the cucks. [Is the average cuck male or female?]

The punishment for cowards, who knew better? Way worse.

It’s going to be much worse.

You want a model to protest on? Protest is a waste of time, you need to develop political power by actually building things first, but here:

One guy at a protest was counter-protesting in a suit and top hat. I think this was OWS. They knocked off his top hat, some random phag took it and you know how fast guys in fringed Afghan scarves can run. Anyway, the guy disappeared calmly round a corner and re-emerged, moments later, in a fresh, new top hat. Like nothing ever happened.

To this day, that BAMF is the smoothest protester I have ever heard of.

End – is there a generic “white race” or racial category for forensic subraces, plural?

But this is the thing – why should other white people listen to you when people can’t even agree on what they are? And should the genetic studies of countries like Britons be lumped in with the Italians? Sicilians??? There is a slight porous quality to whites, because of sex slavery for starters. There are subraces, in forensics e.g. Basque, Celt, whatever, and to overshoot into White only, denies that and denies the kin blood ties of direct family and the genome of the self. Perpetuation of a race is emergent, not deliberate, the human drive is close kin and the owned genome.

And if you won’t ensure your own survival and success, as a member of your group/race/nation, you cannot claim with any intellectual honesty to care about the rest of the population either.

You tailspin into ruin because you reject the majority of your allies.
The West isn’t a treehouse.

Link: The liberal case against identity politics

You wanted it, you got it, toots.

https://www.vox.com/2017/8/15/16089286/identity-politics-liberalism-republicans-democrats-trump-clinton

They’re right in that it’s good for the right and bad for the left, since the left is all about diversity and identity unifies and homogenizes. Nature is conservative and red in tooth and claw.

They cannot think their own policies through to its logical consequences and the unintended ones are farcical.

We’re the same!

Wait, no! We’re different!

We’re somewhat the same but totally equal!

Then there’s all the inequalities!

Hail Science! Unless it’s fake!

Praise the Faith of Liberal Creationism!

It’s totally 100% completely genetic!

Unless there’s engineering tech in the works!

We need immigrants!

We hate robots!

We’re futurists!

We love tests! 

Academia is racist!

The Lord made our enemies ridiculous.

Freud! Sexual theory, inversion

http://www.bartleby.com/278/1.html
I think people don’t read Freud because they assume they know what he will say.

Stay tuned for traps, queers, degeneracy and genetic aspersions.

It’s like asking a Communist for a good book on capitalism. Psychodynamics is the natural enemy of postmodernism. Everything you do is loaded with meaning, nothing you say matters. It isn’t perfect but it has use. It digs down into motive, unlike, say, the gay triangle of CBT, where thoughts magically pop out of nowhere ~dynamic unconsciousness screams into the void~

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15″

Hello, DSM 5.

n.b. The ICD is the DSM only stronger. It’s a huge, honest list of insurance codes. They don’t pretend to care about you, pay the man and take your pills.

A momentary pause for memes that get funnier the more psychodynamics you know.

     

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15  That the inverted are not degenerates in this qualified sense can be seen from the following facts:  16  1. The inversion is found among persons who otherwise show no marked deviation from the normal.  17  2. It is found also among persons whose capabilities are not disturbed, who on the contrary are distinguished by especially high intellectual development and ethical culture. 7  18  3. If one disregards the patients of one’s own practice and strives to comprehend a wider field of experience, he will in two directions encounter facts which will prevent him from assuming inversions as a degenerative sign.  19  (a) It must be considered that inversion was a frequent manifestation among the ancient nations at the height of their culture. It was an institution endowed with important functions. (b) It is found to be unusually prevalent among savages and primitive races, whereas the term degeneration is generally limited to higher civilization (I. Bloch). Even among the most civilized nations of Europe, climate and race have a most powerful influence on the distribution of, and attitude toward, inversion. 8  20″

Nurture theorists got nothing on this man.

“Innateness.—Only for the first and most extreme class of inverts, as can be imagined, has innateness been claimed, and this from their own assurance that at no time in their life has their sexual impulse followed a different course. The fact of the existence of two other classes, especially of the third, speaks against the assumption of its being congenital. Hence, the propensity of those holding this view to separate the group of absolute inverts from the others results in the abandonment of the general conception of inversion. Accordingly in a number of cases the inversion would be of a congenital character, while in others it might originate from other causes.…..

The Relation of Bisexuality.—Since the time of Frank Lydston, Kiernan, and Chevalier, a new stream of thought has been introduced for the explanation of the possibility of sexual inversion. This contains a new contradiction to the popular belief which assumes that a human being is either a man or a woman.”

Unfortunately, Freud appeared to have predicted all this gender binary business.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Sexuality is fluid down generations. Evolution. No naturalistic fallacy about bonobos here, plz.

“Psychic hermaphroditism would gain in substantiality if parallel with the inversion of the sexual object there should be at least a change in the other psychic qualities, such as in the impulses and distinguishing traits characteristic of the other sex. But such inversion of character can be expected with some regularity only in inverted women; in men the most perfect psychic manliness may be united with the inversion. …”

Lesbian neuroscience testosterone studies. 2D:4D ratios. The homosexual male’s femininity is a parody, a social role. They had no trouble hiding it when it was illegal.

He did write a whole book on Leonardo assuming he was homosexual, the reason moderns assume it, so he may be slightly biased in favour of the male purely because his own mother abandoned him to a nanny. We call this attachment issues in child psychology but it’s essentially Freud Pure.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Kinsey hasn’t got shit on Freud.
~confetti~

“A spokesman of the masculine inverts stated the bisexual theory in its crudest form in the following words: “It is a female brain in a male body.” But we do not know the characteristics of a “female brain.” The substitution of the anatomical for the psychological is as frivolous as it is unjustified. The attempted explanation by v. Krafft-Ebing seems to be more precisely formulated than that of Ulrich but does not essentially differ from it. v. Krafft-Ebing thinks that the bisexual predisposition gives to the individual male and female brain cells as well as somatic sexual organs.”

Sounds epigenetic.

“These centers develop first towards puberty mostly under the influence of the independent sex glands. We can, however, say the same of the male and female “centers” as of the male and female brains; and moreover, we do not even know whether we can assume for the sexual functions separate brain locations (“centers”) such as we may assume for language.  33  After this discussion, two thoughts, as it were, remain; first, that a bisexual predisposition is to be presumed for the inversion also, only we do not know wherein it exists beyond the anatomical formations; and, second, that we are dealing with disturbances which are experienced by the sexual impulse during its development. 11  34  ”

Number of abuse victims studies. Sheer quantity, cannot be ignored.
And have you ever met a gay guy that loves his father?
Fuck you, Dad!” the lifestyle crisis.

Traditionally, all fathers asked of their sons was to produce another heir….

crude compensation or coping mechanism
another thrilling round of-

“The Sexual Object of Inverts.—The theory of psychic hermaphroditism presupposed that the sexual object of the inverted is the reverse of the normal. The inverted man, like the woman, succumbs to the charms emanating from manly qualities of body and mind; he feels himself like a woman and seeks a man.  35  But however true this may be for a great number of inverts it by no means indicates the general character of inversion. There is no doubt that a great part of the male inverted have retained the psychic character of virility, that proportionately they show but little the secondary characters of the other sex, and that they really look for real feminine psychic features in their sexual object. If that were not so it would be incomprehensible why masculine prostitution, in offering itself to inverts, copies in all its exterior, to-day as in antiquity, the dress and attitudes of woman.”

The original ‘are traps gay?’

To round off by repeating one section considering our current knowledge of the microbiome and the possible role of Gay Germ theory.

“It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. ”

How about you read the thing before taking an SJW’s word for it?

Their definition of homophobia and privilege are also deeply Freudian.

Political quizzes are biased, says common sense

http://www.amerika.org/politics/why-political-quizzes-miss-the-point-entirely/

The structure writing them is designed to support itself.

These people aren’t taught alternatives!

It’s like asking the Pope’s position on theism!

They should just ask your age, sex, race and nationality status and guess based on those.

Everything is identity politics, including class.