French warm up to another Revolution

Maybe if the MSM keep hitting the Nazi pinata, people might start listening to them again?

Jihad isn’t mentioned once.

This is indicative of what’s really going on.

The Communist isn’t called ‘far-left’ and her word about her sworn enemy (the right) is automatically believed.

These Frenchies don’t have Internalised Racism. They have genophilia.
It’s like none of those clueless people understand the reason the monarchy was toppled. They refused to listen to the people. It was about class, identity and stealing money with taxes for the lazy. The demographic leeches kept sucking.

I don’t think France will kick off first. Maybe Paris, but not France.

Probably Italy, somewhere nobody cares about like Denmark, Sweden would be funny.

Don’t forget who caused this mess. Brussels, I’m looking at you.

PC ‘culture’ [signalling] is a fake fantasy world. You can be anything you want except a happy, straight white man.

“I’m not eating little cakes with a few representatives who, in reality, represent only themselves,” she sniffed.

Nothing to do with the Revolution, nope!

The Guardian panics, turns on SJWs

They say no enemies to the Left, but when the going gets tough, they push one another in the line of fire first.

These hoes ain’t loyal.

They always beg a question with this rhetoric, critical theory never posits alternatives so you can never argue with an alternative.

And how, exactly, would a non-populist democracy work?

How? How would we count votes? Isn’t a vote like a beauty contest? This is absurd.

A selection of comments.

How else can Oxford law students tell welders about how privileged they are.
Identity politics is how the modern left got around having to deal with poorer people,class and economic inequality.
It was also about making the focus on themselves, their friends and not those beneath, whatever colour or sexuality etc they are.
It is a rejection of what the left was always about.

We were taught to value diversity back in the days when we weren’t overwhelmed by it. Now, the fear is setting in because we never thought that we, the majority, would have to sacrifice our own culture in order to help other people assimilate. I think the current problems are being caused by minorities who have not reciprocated by sacrificing a part of their culture to fit in with us. Yesterday, I noticed that the wrod ‘ADVENT’ has been replaced by ‘chocolate’ (thanks, Tesco). It seems we are no longer allowed to call advent calendars by their real name. I have always supported the multi-cultural society, but it’s gone too far now.

Edging towards some kind of argument about 15 years too late.

At last someone in this paper that gets it, sadly judging by the comments the average Guardianista still doesn’t and let’s be honest they never will, they’re not genuine left wingers, they’re more interested in virtue signalling than they are in actually doing any good.
The old left wouldn’t have supported staying in the EU and they wouldn’t have tolerated the harm mass immigration has done to the poorest, there’s a reason why UKIP could destroy the Labour Party.

Multiculturalism doesn’t work. Globalism is good for capitalists.

Utterly superb article that I am amazed to see on here, and which restores a considerable amount of my faith in the Guardian. So much so that I’ll give serious thought to contributing, finally.
Obviously I say this as the article effectively supports the position I’ve been setting out for years on here – I imagine many would disagree with this though. The problem for those people, is that they have no way to win power back with identity politics.

Oh no what a shame…

These people have never painted a room, have they? You plan your exit first, otherwise the expression ‘paint yourself into a corner’. Victory conditions, not that they read game theory. They probably think it’s the Scrabble rulebook.

It* was only going to work for as long as Labour held the working class.

The White working class.
You screwed over the white people and they stopped voting for you. Boo hoo.

They always beg the question, they presume their belief system is true and you agree with it, before speaking. Social Justice is a theory. So is creationism. So is astrology**. You can make a layman’s theory about anything, but the burden of proof is on you to apply that fantasy to reality. If you can’t, if you fail to FIX the problem and pontificate on about it (a Catholic term) then you lose. Leftists – all talk, no walk.

*Cultural Marxism.

**Yes I’m mocking myself. However, I did predict Trump based on an uncanny Regulus, making me more reliable than 90% of MSM. Even most astrology sites were gunning for Hillary based on a misread of her natal chart.

“Hold the working class”
“No way to win back”

much force and entitlement, the Left always becomes fascist eventually

They know exactly what they’re doing. The type of creature to flop on its back, expose its belly and plead for mercy, and then, once your back is turned, kill you ruthlessly. If Trump hadn’t won, what do you think this article would have been about? They want to start fights and beat people (up) without using their fists. Cowards. Who listens to a chicken? Especially when they go Chicken Little about the ice caps (fine), the polar bears (fine) and the poor gays (better than ever). They complained about victory so we gave them defeat.

Link: What ‘progressive’ liberals do best

Political correctness does exist as a competing form of manners among the middle-middle class, and it posits superiority over those above it (as, absurdly, privileged) as well as those beneath it (ignorant bigots).

In a word, it’s signalling masquerading as manners.

Funny how they’re exempt on ALL counts. Imagine what they were like as children! Shh, I’m telling! You used a bad word! (Albeit a correct word).

They wonder why nobody is listening to them anymore and even in the cases of classic liberals, actively voting against them. We’ve all been, collectively, far more polite than they ever could be, to put up with it for years.

For comparison

Whereas they are quarrelsome as a preacher at a Satanic ritual, who wouldn’t be so gauche as to say the other person was using the ‘incorrect’ pronouns, when those are dictionary-standard. Social justice is a smirking, smug means of social control.

It’s called political correctness because A. politicians are polite liars and B. they live to ‘correct’ others, generally unable to control themselves.

If you force a man to love his murderers (terrorists) you have driven him mad.

Yet, what is social justice without an authority? And they don’t have God? That leaves… themselves.

Yep, it’s an egomaniacal/megalomaniac complex, writ into politics. Consider, without politics, what do they have to talk about? How boring are they, as people?

Finally, everyone else, everyone they disregarded as the reviled majority, is signalling against them. Everyone is finally aboard the identity politics bandwagon and they don’t feel special anymore. [hypocrites] Little do they realize, this is to teach them a lesson with their own poison. That would require an ounce of self-awareness.

Everyone else replies: I am not one of you. I am proud of that.

They call this the rise of populism or nationalism or some other sneering jibe. They’re making it tilt harder and slip power from their hands.

They demonstrate no awareness of consequences (among the liberal privilege) because their very lives are sheltered and coddled. Rather than being open-minded to the ‘experiences’ of others, they shun and ridicule them. How dare the lumpen-prole question them, they don’t even attend theatre! Mind your place and ‘educate yourself’, says the girl who waits tables or lives off her parents. Expect they will lose many popularity contests elections, if not actively bet against them. Peoples are slow to rise and hard to quell.

Again, distrust anyone who makes politics their life. And what do they reply? The personal is political. Nay, it’s vanity. All is vanity and hashtag selfies with office paper signs. It would be one thing if they had a life, to be so self-obsessed with. How boring are they, individually?

I think we all know the answer. Worst of all, they’re incapable of having fun.

I mean, really, who slags off someone’s fancy dress costume?

And who tells you what to wear, aside from an obnoxious step-parent?

They have only themselves to blame for the ways they’re privately despised.

omg really wtf go away no audrey

By all means, trust fund baby, tell me about wealth redistribution and how much you admire Karl Marx.

It’s a false rebellion to preserve their social power.

If they had a brain, they’d hate globalism and the rise of developing nations more than anyone, having the most to lose. They’ll understand when they spend their twilight years working in a supermarket because the pensions ran out. Presently, they assume they’re ‘too good’ for it. They will soon be corrected. Social mobility usually goes down.

The chart you need re votes for women

h/t VoxDay

Yeah, they’re a good idea.

The racial suffrage came in after sex didn’t it? This is why. I’ve said before, according to HBD, the sexes are more alike than the races. Here’s proof from the latest election.

Anyone trying to be edgy and saying women vote Left is only thinking of college students, who rarely vote regardless. Women historically vote with family and security. They want you to focus on sex so you’ll accept them, and they’re always a race other than white, aren’t they? Coincidence, right?

Triangulation is a form of domestic abuse. Rabble-rousers, let’s you and him fight. Divide and conquer the civilization to be barren. Sexism is that the opposite sex (nobody ever feels it about themselves) cannot be trusted. The rest is specious.
In this case, blame the female, how dare you mention race! shrieking.

Most of the time, they don’t hate women for a logical reason, but because of their religion, if you know what I mean. #youknowexactlywhatImean The rest is a rationalization about Western porn whores, as if all women are porn stars (nothing about the male ones and directors, admin companies, oddly).

Like, turn on your women, reject them sexually. [MGTOW]
We’ll be happy to take them off your hands, white man! [PUA]

Then they gloat to you that white women don’t want you anymore.
I’m sure that’s why they have to try so hard with stupid lines and text games, and rapes are still a frequent thing.

They think we’re all (white people) stupid to their tactics. The Middle Eastern culture in particular praises lying and deception. Look it up.

Right-wing activism that never was

There are two ways to win when the People are downtrod: voting and violence.
Thankfully voting has been winning.

Right-wing activism is a myth. A fable. A story. A narrative. A spin. Look at PEGIDA, what happened? Walking protests, banned by the State. All of them.

I suppose you could write a political fairytale about this.

Aw, shucks.

As long as I can remember, the media has been claiming that there are Nazis, fascists, and religious right-wing theocrats hiding in every closet and under every bed, just waiting for somebody to express an opinion that was in vogue 30 years ago but horribly unfashionable now, at which point all these Nazis, fascists and religious right-wing theocrats would jump out and reveal themselves, impose a totalitarian government, and kill just about everybody. This would be horribly offensive to women and minorities, and therefore unacceptable. I would not recommend potential right-wing activists take the media’s word for it, however.

The media’s business model depends on printing comfortable and popular lies, and it is therefore full of society’s best liars. The media does not stop lying when it claims there are brownshirts under your bed just waiting to suddenly return and attempt a Fourth Reich. In reality, there are no powerful right-wing institutions, few if any powerful people who are openly right-wing, and no powerful right-wing political parties on the cusp of seizing power. But if the ordinary person realized and internalized that fact, there would be no need for the radically left-wing parties masquerading as level-headed moderates that rule Western countries nowadays.

The Left needs to justify its presence after getting everything they want(ed), so they make up constant barrages of new shit. They keep swimming left, dragging the Overton window with them and further reinforcing their power. This leaves moderate conservatism cast into the expanding shadow of Extreme, its prospects dwindling without serious measures and a will that simply doesn’t exist while bread and circuses continue.

If the Left are truly the underdogs, why is it trendy to support them in the Establishment?
Why does the Government fund far left groups like anti-fa? Who get arrested every time they ‘peacefully protest’? Including at other people’s protests?
Why did the conservatives open a Centre for Social Justice?
Why is the hate speech law not applied to certain groups, all clustered in the Leftist political interest?

These are the questions you aren’t allowed to ask.

But sure, you don’t have censorship, only there’s a list list of people you can’t disagree with.
Free speech is dead in the West, but arguably, it never lived.

Jews create identity politics and the Golem turns against them

They wanted the rules, they set the rules.

Meanwhile Vox Day continues to enjoy a temporary Quantum Whiteness, depending on his rhetoric.

Like how he claims to be European now, and still Native American. But Magic Dirt is BS.

He’s playing the Plural Pronoun Game.

Who is We?

You claim to be non-White, it’s a category error to speak on behalf of White people and what we ought to do.
You moved from your stated homeland to settle among us, while telling us to kick out the invaders.


this is awkward

He doesn’t want the Universal Suffrage of the West, like many ignoramuses who refuse to study our laws, but chooses to live here.

Doesn’t stop him talking about women either, as if he knows us.
Better than we know ourselves. <creepy gaslighting music plays>

As a <>


(All) <> are

Please stop, if you’re half the IQ you claim.

I refuse to explain the irrationality of sweeping statements. Especially when it involves at least three billion people. The sexes are more alike than the races e.g. siblings versus neighbours. This is common sense.

This is interesting.


You aren’t friends with Whites until you can rib them.

True, but we mustn’t confuse that with genuine insults, backed by malice.
Say from non-whites who constantly start on whites while living under our fluffy safe yoke and insulting our women like we’re American porn stars. For example.

VD himself…

You whine and cry about Christian societies, and yet you kept invading them and trying to live in them despite the fact that you were invading them illegally.

No? Excuses? Exactly. What a surprise.

Projection? No… perish the thought.

There is nothing American about them but their paperwork.

What does your paperwork say?

All these people claim to be, like, 150-170 in IQ score.

Does the evidence suggest this?

Does it?

“Let’s blame women”

I keep hearing this conclusion in various forms from the manosphere and it’s very confusing.

So I looked for a balanced version.

However. Aside from assuming the history of America is the history of the whole world.

Um, aren’t men supposed to be the champions of civilization?

Inconvenient Question: Why are you expecting the women to save the men?

no what I don't believe it can't be true disbelief pushing daisies

In all human history, has that ever happened? Is it even possible? How?

Assuming women all saw the light tomorrow, where are our champions? Where are the suitable husbands and captains of industry? The guys angry-typing in ALL CAPS online who claim ‘they’ built civilization can’t put up a spice rack. What use would we have for them, as they are? Who are we supposed to follow?

We have pajama boys and video game players denying reality as much as a feminist with campus rape data.

What does the manosphere intend to do about that?

Sweet FA, because pointing out their immaturity would trigger their hurt feelings and we can’t have that. They talk a big game about ‘self-improvement’ but they mean fake masculinity, like good hair and big useless muscles aka they act like gay guys. Nothing about building a business (blogging doesn’t count, businesses are literal physical entities you must maintain) and nothing about keeping a marriage afloat from old coots who’ve actually done it. They seriously ask single men how to keep a wife. Should we ask the fat activists how to keep slim?

The evidence points to male academics founding feminism (Frankfurt). Men like the FEMEM leader profiteer from it. Business interests and charity heading men and politicians profit from feminism the most. School keeps everyone dumb well into adulthood now. Young people aren’t being taught how to grow up. Look at the popularity of kid’s cartoons and geek culture. It’s perma-childhood. It’s creepy. It’s like the Twilight Zone.

Some quotes.

Very few people are genuinely evil and wish bad things upon others.  And we can safely say that the majority of women are NOT evil people who wish to destroy the best development of human history.  And though there are some genuinely evil people who DO wish to destroy and harm others (feminists and SJW’s) the vast majority of women are well intentioned, caring people.

The problem, however, is you can be the sweetest woman with all the best intentions in the world.  If you’re naive or ignorant to the point you’re wrong, you’ll still have the same effects of being an evil, malicious person out to cause damage.  Thus, whether out ignorance or evil, society is going to pay the exact same price no matter what your intentions.  And so, as women vote and make other decisions in life about how the country should be run, Western Civilization suffers because of their ignorance and naivety.

Isn’t this really about supporting Marxist parasites?
Don’t men do that too? Don’t men make up the bulk of Communists?
Why only start on women for a bad behaviour both exhibit?

The government spending lie is one we’re all fed at goverment-sponsored schools. We aren’t forced to go to school because they care for us but because they expect to profit from us and our labour once we’re adult.

Yet the manosphere acts like modern schooling is good for girls too. Is it teaching us to be women, let alone good women? No! It’s just as bad for girls as boys.

Previous to women’s suffrage and the massive expansion of government, men were the nucleus of society and the economy.  It was around a man families and society were raised.  And it was his economic production that supported them all.

I don’t know where he’s getting his information (50s adverts?) but children were the focus. Men were the primary provider but women provided labour and fertility. It was a totally even exchange. Both parents sacrificed for the children, the centre of the home was the kitchen.

Who wanted the family to fall, why? To kill capitalism.

Gender politics turns the family unit against itself. We’re being conned.


Because it will keep the left in power.  It will expand and ensure future government control.

paging K. Marx


To be frank there is none.

oh no oh dear hides facepalm double

What do the enemy hate?

Nuclear family.

What should we do to defeat them?


The answer lies in the founding principle of Western Civilzation – Merit.


You sleep around and got an STD? Too bad.
You sleep around and got pregnant? Pay for your own medical treatment, it was your lifestyle choice.
You want consequence-free sex? It’s called a hooker.

Treat adults like adults. No more excuses. No more free passes trading on pretend ignorance. Sex is the big one. What did you seriously expect would happen? Did you seriously think it had no consequences?

He’s right about this part. Universal suffrage.

For example, in the embryonic years of the United States you not only had to be a white male to vote, you also had to own property.  The founding fathers had this requirement because not only did they not want blacks or women to vote, but because they also didn’t want stupid white men to vote!  You couldn’t just have been “born a white male.”  You also had to prove you could work and manage your finances accordingly that you were a productive member of society.  And requiring ownership of property was a proxy for that hurdle.

Proof of competence.

However, while that may have had the intended effect in 1790, today we have the technology that a much better and much more meritorious voting franchise can be given – taxes.

Very simply, if you want to vote you need to have paid taxes.

lol laughing rdj tony stark heehee haha

Everybody in the UK is subsidized. Everybody. Somehow.

Even the politicians get expenses for their taxpayer champagne.

And you thought I was kidding. That’s the capitalist party.

Nobody could vote under a No Parasite Policy.

Maybe, like, one guy. Who lives on an island.

Trans-Ageism and Paedophilia

For the past few years, sexual identity politics has been coerced into every facet of our lives. Not a moment goes by where a major news outlet isn’t pushing the trans agenda. While transsexuals make up less than 0.3 per cent of the US population, it is statistically impossible that such a small, insignificant group of people constantly make headlines for no other reason than to meet propaganda targets for a culture shift. The propaganda has been successful though. Half of young people believe gender isn’t limited to male and female, and are now choosing the genders they see fit, whether or not they defy science or reality. But beyond being sued for not using the proper pronouns, a major problem many aren’t foreseeing—among the tolerance and apathy of their dying society—is the slippery slope to complete decadence that we are currently sliding down..

arrogant smug uhuh aww yes yeah mhmm sexy bamf hugh jackman

Call me a hipster but I think the decadence started before it was cool to say so.