There’s no such thing as a tease

It’s a porn lie. They’re selling you the idea of sexually forward women.

Or Hollywood Lolita pedo bullshit.

A ‘tease’ is what creeps say to attractive women who existed in their vicinity.

You are not entitled to sex. There’s no coy, they’re just not interested. In studies, these types of men have been proven to assume sexual interest from women where there was none, deluding themselves. Nobody is leading them on, but you have to humour the crazy to get away. Picture it like a hoodie approaching you asking for something. Be nice and get away.
They are being civilized, women are conditioned to smile, it’s polite.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/az1w3j/do_you_hate_it_when_women_on_the_streets_smile_at/

They’re such cowards they’ll literally body slam a woman, the weaker sex.
Literal assault.
You’re angry with men? Pick on your own sex.
But if they continue to physically assault women walking in public, they’ll get plenty of ‘sex’ in prison.

Things that make women evil, according to incels:

being female
(being male, too)
being male and looking female
being ambiguously male or female
looking at them
not looking at them
smiling at them
not smiling at them
being fat
being thin
being tall
being short
being smart
being dumb
being scientific
not being scientific
being soldiers
not being soldiers
being mothers
not being mothers
being wives
being single
being Christian
being atheist
having sex
not having sex
make-up
no make-up
fake nails
natural nails
expensive hairdo
crap hairdo
dressing feminine
not dressing feminine
curves
no curves
caring what men think
not caring what men think
having opinions
not having opinions
working hard
being lazy
voting
not voting
paying taxes
not paying taxes
having a job
being on welfare
being a boss
being married to a boss
paying for their own meal
not paying for their own meal
attention-whoring
avoiding them
oppressing them with relationships
not oppressing them with relationships
having kids, with anyone
having no kids, with anyone
race-mixing
not race-mixing
showing skin
wearing long skirts
posting bikini shots
not posting bikini shots
flirting randomly
not flirting
being clingy
being a cold-hearted bitch
getting emotional
having none of the feels

Need I go on? Clearly, women are not the problem.

Near the end of that long, long list:

killing your kids
making them pay child support
reporting rape
not reporting rape
being murdered
being alive

Maybe they just have anger issues? They are the most triggered people ALIVE.
Offended by literally anything.

But it isn’t misogyny!

They don’t HATE women, they just want single wives who are whorish virgins with all and no sexual XP, fertile but not too much, exactly the religious they are, a domestic slave that doesn’t need to be paid or sleep or work or clean or tend to babies while homesteading and living in the city because of the bars, with magical gravity defying tiddies despite breastfeeding at least 12 babies, all vaginal deliveries with no complications, tearing or stretch marks.

See? Totally reasonable.

She also never has periods (but fertile) and manages to keep a perfect figure, even throughout pregnancy and lactation.

It isn’t women they hate, just women who don’t live up to their standard, which totally existed in the ambiguous Past in the vague Culture they keep talking about [citation needed].

Because beggars can indeed be choosers and they choose the best.

Women are obviously entitled snowflakes who project because men are flawless and never wrong, that’s why their death rate is high, drug abuse is high, crime is high, mental problems are high and IQs are globally tanked.

The politics of all these wonderful male politicians has given us such a peaceful, logical society.

Women: exist
Incels: …bitch

Women are so IRRATIONAL, AREN’T THEY?

Yet another exciting round of ‘why everything is women’s fault even though men are statistically in charge’.

It’s like atheists with Christians but sex-specific, which isn’t even a choice.

What kind of Satanism is this? They must be operating from a spiritual void, but which one?

Don’t tread on me means don’t tell me to fucking smile, it’s weird. Nobody finds a man that insecure about a stranger’s facial expression charming.

Women are striking, you just don’t see it.

No future? Fine, no bother.

If men don’t wanna get married, the motivation for women giving a single shit what they “think” flutters out the window, drops and dies on the pavement.

If that were true, women would be having less sex than older generations at the same age. Check.

Women would be less likely to report as feminists? Check.

Women would be voting Brexit and Trump. Check.

Women would be focusing on career since men won’t be the provider? Check.

Women would be insulting men who refuse their gender role. Check.

Women wouldn’t sleep around because there’s nothing in it. Check.

All the damn checks. And you know the worst part?

Buy your own ccTV

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-14/here-reason-why-smart-tvs-are-so-cheap

Just get a computer monitor or projector.

You don’t need a TV.

The wifi isn’t how they transmit out, there’s a spy chip. If it’s plugged in, it’s spying. Don’t buy anything ‘smart’. They’re proven to record voice and video. Blackmail material (vice). Your eyes can’t see these resolutions. They probably emit infertility-causing radiation and pollute the air.

They even sell spy toasters ffs.

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/04/griffin-connects-your-toast-to-your-phone/

If they won’t let you open up the back to see what the guts are, it’s spying on you.

You’re paying to have your rights breached.

This began with the iPhone.

If they don’t trust you to change a battery….

Boomer tech at its finest.

Vegan propaganda

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/nov/01/third-of-britons-have-stopped-or-reduced-meat-eating-vegan-vegetarian-report

Note the link says one third that magically disappears.

Fake news, people who can afford to go to Waitrose are going to boutique butchers.

One in eight”

POOF! GONE!

“Britons is now vegetarian or vegan, according to a new report on food shopping that underlines a revolution in the UK’s eating habits.”
Invest in healthcare, there’s a boom in medical conditions on the horizon.

https://www.aarp.org/health/brain-health/info-10-2011/b12-level-affects-brain-size-health-discovery.html

Veganism: The brain aging diet?

Vegetarian and vegan are totally different diets, stop conflating them, the false equivalence gives me a Vitamin B12 deficiency brain shrinkage headache.

There’s also the blatantly obvious fact that more plants increases pesticide ingestion. Organic plants still contain a lot of pesticide, increasing intake substantially (% of diet) will steamroll omnivore consumption.

Plus the animal and bug murder of ‘pest control’.

https://www.quora.com/If-farmers-use-pesticides-to-kill-pests-doesnt-that-make-their-produce-not-vegan

A five year-old could understand that making food involves killing things, that also want to eat your food. Biological competition?

Here’s where they sneak in the propaganda:

A series of influential reports have said that avoiding meat and dairy products is the single biggest way consumers can reduce their environmental impact on the planet, because farming animals is such a CO2-intensive process.”

So is the article about a Waitrose survey or mysterious, unlinked (!) reports?

“Nick Palmer, the head of Compassion in World Farming UK says “Science proves that the healthiest diet is one that is plant-heavy. By eating less meat, fish, eggs and dairy

most food, then

and choosing higher welfare when we do, we can all help animals, people and the planet.””

Science proves no, it doesn’t.

Source? There are certainly no solid studies like that on vegans. We’ve been looking but all they hand us is hand-waving conjecture and reddit-tier self-report. Scientism promotes the high-fructose diet of veganism and their skin shows it.

Also, people are animals. If you really wanted to help the planet, you’d commit suicide. Total extinction of your carbon footprint, as a carbon-based life form.

The Waitrose info seems to confirm it’s a static fad, as in, no new people are taking it up.

Is that it? Also now it’s 1 in 5.

“Publication of the findings represents awkward timing for Waitrose.” PR. Fake news. A term banned in the press here now.
Faking data for the public should be illegal, especially when these people are dispensing medical advice.

Back to pure, organic bullshit:
“The number of vegans in the UK, who shun all animal products including dairy and eggs, has grown fourfold in the past four years from 150,000 to 600,000,”

Wait for it.

“…according to the Vegan Society.”
Would they lie to us? And that isn’t very encouraging considering rising obesity levels, what % of vegetarians and what % of vegans are overweight at all?

Look at the Waitrose data. There are tiny percentages involved.
For <50s, the number is static between age ranges. There is no movement.

The lines added represent the mean for almost all age groups, and it wobbles within 1-2%, nothing!

“Waitrose was the first UK supermarket to install dedicated vegan sections in 134 of its stores in May.”

Ah, this is an advert.

What’s the difference between a cucumber and a vegan cucumber?

What you do with it.

That justifies the price hike.

“This year, we’ve seen vegan food go mainstream” said Natalie Mitchell.

No, it isn’t, the rate of uptake isn’t higher with people under 30 or even 20.

If you’re gonna lie with statistics, get good with it?

“people are discovering that it tastes amazing.”

reconcile with

“Many of the vegan and vegetarian respondents said they missed bacon sandwiches and pork scratchings.”

“About 60% of vegans and 40% of vegetarians surveyed said they had adopted the lifestyle over the past five years, with 55% citing animal welfare concerns, 45% health reasons and 38% environmental issues.”

So what? Relevance? Make a different article proving that.

They don’t want to label halal meat, let alone ban its inhumane production in this country. They don’t care about the animals. Whatsoever.

There are no good studies I’ve seen on veganism altogether and vegetarian studies are fraught with method errors then environment – well, most new meat demand comes from China so you’re barking up the wrong tree. And their demand is only rising with their population boom.

https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Regions/Asia/China
https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm

Behold! Real DATA!

That is not your imagination, Israel consumes BY FAR the most meat in the world (poultry value cinches it).

When are you shaming them, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Peru?

Are the Guardian calling on the UK government to reduce production in this country of Halal and Kosher meat (insufficiently or not at all stunned, torturing the animal?) and to stop selling it abroad, increasing cruel meat demand? No? Then they don’t care about the animals.

“Scientific research published this year found that without meat and dairy consumption, global farmland use could be reduced by more than 75% – an area equivalent to the US, China, the EU and Australia combined – and still feed the world.”

So who eats the most meat? Clue – not white people! Are we all meant to go on rations (worse than rations, majority food group eradication) for the supposed benefit of other people in the world who don’t?
Shaming people for eating, they’re totally serious.

Detour:

BCD – children deserve to develop properly and adults require adequate nutrition for fertility, especially women. I’m shocked the feminists are too dense to twig that shaming dairy is heavily sexist against women.

Before someone who can’t google gets triggered at the word ‘sexist’…

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070228064902.htm
“Researchers in the United States have found a link between a low-fat dairy diet and increased risk of anovulatory infertility.” For one study.

There is definitely a link between veganism (worse, no dairy) and female infertility which remains unexplored.

“In the drinks aisle, Waitrose singles out the popularity of organic wine.”

Alcohol is proven to permanently damage your DNA. Health reasons, huh? Not signalling?

Wine doesn’t have mental benefits over beer, either. It’s false stereotype.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/10/13/iq-and-alcohol-choices/

“Waitrose’s managing director, Rob Collins, said: “Being mindful of how we live and eat has become a priority in today’s world. As we become increasingly mindful of our own health, the wellbeing of our family and that of the planet, we’re reshaping how we shop, cook and eat.””

Read: consume less food so your betters can consume more, for the good of socialist globalism.

It won’t make you stupider, that’s impossible….

https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/99legacy/6-14-1999a.html
“It was this new meat diet, full of densely-packed nutrients, that provided the catalyst for human evolution, particularly the growth of the brain…”

Fun fact: A lot of Hollywood goes vegan because it allows their body to handle more drug abuse.

https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/zmzjnw/is-cocaine-vegan-it-depends-on-who-you-ask

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/03/13/174205188/is-your-medicine-vegan-probably-not
“Is Your Medicine Vegan? Probably Not”

The Darwin Awards need a Vegan section.

http://www.veganfitness.net/viewtopic.php?t=271

“Some people avoid products that are tested on or derived from animals, but don’t feel drug-use, smoking, and the like are directly related to the issue of animal cruelty.”

http://gawker.com/5905479/woman-dies-of-starvation-while-on-an-all-sunlight-diet

Here’s an illustration of the issue I take with surveys on diet.

I hand-typed this.

https://www.vegsoc.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=753
Vegetarian Society:

2007 – 3618 adults
2009 – 3219 adults
2010 – 548 adults
2011 – 1031 adults
2012 – 1491 adults surveyed.

2007 – 3% vegetarian (more female), 2% vegan (more men).
2009 – 3% vegetarian, 5% partially (WTF is that? That’s normal).
2010 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2011 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2012 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.

Reconcile with

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/news/number-of-vegans-in-britain-rises-by-360-in-10-years/

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/apr/01/vegans-are-coming-millennials-health-climate-change-animal-welfare

Opposite politics, reporting the same shoddy “data”.
Thinks that make you go Hmmmmm….

What propaganda? Fake news is banned.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181023/19301840900/uk-government-screws-head-straight-bans-use-term-fake-news-govt-officials.shtml

You don’t need a phrase like that.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/440783/proportion-of-vegetarians-in-the-united-kingdom/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/562911/global-sales-growth-of-the-vegan-market-by-country/

“As of 2016, Asia Pacific held the largest share of vegan consumers globally, with approximately nine percent of people following a vegan diet in this area.”

Remember when England was Islamic?

No, me neither. This is more cucky than Hank Green videos and trust me, that’s cucky.

If you don’t want to punch that smug facial expression trying to force feed shit about your own culture down your throat, you might be a cuck.

It’s like a deleted scene from Idiocracy.

Hadrid’s wall. Where’s that? Do you mean Hadrian?

Protestantism. Wut.

Using the term Dark Ages.  That’s a paddlin’.

That isn’t Middle Ages or Medieval times. Is the guy doing this making it up?

And it was a pretty good time to be alive, they were free of Roman enslavement.

https://www.history.com/news/6-reasons-the-dark-ages-werent-so-dark

Islamic science didn’t exist (neither did science, it’s a specific method and philosophy of empiricism) but they did translate stolen Greek or Latin works and pass them off as their own. Did I mention they were stolen? Plagiarism isn’t discovery now and it wasn’t then.

If Islamic areas were so great back then, who took over because they’re shithole countries now. Why do they wanna move here? Just remittance?

Assuming England existed as a name or monarchy as in its current form with GB. I assume this was set before the Norman invasion? Why don’t multicultural pushers mention the Norman INVASION more often, it’s a mystery.

Acting like Islam existed before Christianity (no).

Acting like Judaism was a common thing. No.

Modern wheat didn’t exist back then.

Education was tutors and apprentices, it was better quality than state schooling we have now.

If nobles were illiterate, how could they manage their estates?

Implying taxes aren’t compulsory.

Acting like serfdom wasn’t just rent.

Magical remedies like aspirin?

PC rewriting of history doesn’t work.

Infant mortality was based on Rhesus factors, not washing the hands and maternal mortality giving birth, babies and the other kids didn’t last long without the mother. There were also child rape cases so they died from being old enough to get pregnant but not to give birth. There’s about a five year window on that. It takes a long time for growth plates to shift.

Implying we had no healers before the Romans. That is possibly the worst part, like nobody thought to tend the sick, ignore the archaeological evidence of brain surgery in pre-society cavemen. Also implies they didn’t knock out patients first beforehand. How stupid do you think they were?

Stop acting like everyone was multicultural. It was called war. Some groups existed in isolation,temporarily. That’s like saying America is Chinese because Chinatown exists. (Why does Chinatown still exist? Isn’t that racist?)

The Muslims Vlad the Impaler stopped wanted to impale the natives in another way. Nobody brings up the humour of it considering they were famous in Europe for raping little boys (continues to this day, ask Afghanistan-based soldiers) so he was saying “you come here to do that and this will happen to you”. Nowadays they choose girls because the law is more lax about applying pedophilia charges, they’re likelier to get away with it by claiming they didn’t know it was unwanted (lies, ignorance of the law is apparently an excuse) or they say it’s consensual (standard rapist line). We wouldn’t want to hurt a pedo’s feelings, would we?

There is more information in a Horrible Histories book than this video.

“A power and cultural identity vacuum” no we were fine before the Italians invaded and raped their way around Europe, thanks. Even better once they finally fucked off.

It’s like they took seriously all the later peddlers of myths trying to scare their contemporaries (yes, people wrote fake histories, the BBC continues this tradition to this day).

Lies porn told you

Tasteful controversy. Nice.

I find it odd we fixate on the likes of Bond girls (Mary Sues mostly) when Bond is psychologically more disturbed than a woman trying to choke him with her maternal thighs or whatever. He’s the active party, right? You could accurately describe his adventures as The Wandering Ballsack. It’s the height of 60s Boomerisms, all he does is consume and fuck around. Nobody talks about it in the context of psychiatric issues except Craig who brilliantly, when asked if there was anything real men could learn from Bond and apply in their life, replied “No. Nothing”.

https://mashable.com/2015/10/23/daniel-craig-james-bond-comments/

Bond is the epitome of a vapid man, who only cares about cars, clothes and indulgence. He’s late-stage Roman empire. This isn’t fucking Shakespeare.
Craig couldn’t be more different from him in real life if he tried;

Bond was skewered greatly by early seasons of Archer, Bond is so weak he can’t stop drinking “or the collective hangover might kill me”. Is bravado now the substitute for genuine toughness in men? Apparently so.

It makes memes like this really fucking cringeworthy.

It hurts to read this shit. All he does is shoot things.

Bitch, he couldn’t turn up to an office job at 8am sober.

Except for token gay subplots stinking up the franchise, am I right?

If that rings a bell –

Two can play at that fucking game. Hurts, doesn’t it?

If your role model has a completely hollow life, what the hell is going on?

I air-punched at him sticking up for himself in this one:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3284733/Daniel-Craig-shuts-reporter-excruciating-Spectre-interview-repeatedly-asks-pout.html

Amazing quotes from the man himself:

“Let’s not forget that he’s actually a misogynist.”
“I still think he wants to f*ck anything with a pulse.”
“…I don’t give a f*ck.”

He’s 100% English, we hate Bond as the American’s ideal of what a man should be. It’s Hemingway with a different accent, remember he shot himself. It’s a suit and a penis, how insulting. Fleming knew his audience were gullible for some vanity and validation and this was in the 50s, by publication date, supposed heyday of the real thing? We love Craig because he gets how ridiculous it all is. There’s practically a fourth wall break and a wink.

He’ll brain a guy with a kitchen sink and smirk at the camera.

The smirk isn’t “I can get away with this”, it’s “can you believe idiots look up to this shit”?

You can easily live like James Bond these days if you get into a lot of credit card debt. He’s Zoolander with flashy murder gadgets. He’s a massive special snowflake, the world needs him, specifically, to save it. Why not #006 or #008?

In general, in real life, most men aren’t special. They can’t even save themselves from a death spiral of degeneracy. It’s ancient wisdom the wastrel (hedon) has a wasted life, male or female (before you ask).

A role model for men is not a narcissist who goes around shooting people, that’s a TV news story set at a school waiting to happen. Nowadays Bond would be social media famous like old unhinged RDJ and on a public sexual harassment watch list. This guy literally interrupts a woman in her hotel shower, (he broke in) you’d never see that scene play out the other way around. My personal favourite is the almost autistic scene where he looks in on her getting ready, what if she was replacing a tampon or something?

Who looks up to a guy like that? Seriously?
Craig is sick of being treated like a massive jerk.

Could you imagine the boundaries he must have with other men?

There’s no way he wouldn’t be bisexual, don’t lie to me Hollywood.
A man who screws anything that moves is bisexual, it’s a fact.

He doesn’t even hit on a man, not even for work purposes to get info?

You go guy, right?

Statistically, it would be mostly Bond Boys, actually.

I picture Milo in the role, he fits well.

Male honeypots aren’t sleeping with women.

Oh but Monroe’s glamour is tacky, are you kidding me? At least nobody took that seriously, it was fun play acting. If you listen to her interviews she was intelligent. Picture up top, reconcile with her infamous, “If you aren’t committed, don’t bother” speech. These guys twist it but women know that’s the rationale. Women know their worth. Men are wasting their time on external objects and bullshit posturing, while calling the women superficial. I don’t know a single woman who wants to go into debt for a slightly shinier car but okay.