Self-improvement special snowflake dudebro cult

A life coach is a priest with none of the insight. Like Oprah, they tell men to be self-involved, self-indulgent Carrie from SATC types. I caught some clips of that show as a kid (where she was ranting about her shit problems and non-life) and I was confused, since here we associate friend group cults (“cliques”) and binge drinking, sleeping around pointlessly with the men, it’s considered a uniquely male weakness. Apparently America was pushing it as feminine, which never worked. Our lad culture goes back many ruined generations.

Anyway, onto the topic at hand. I don’t think men realise what losers some of them have willfully become. The concept of dishonour must come back, whether they’re perma-single or not. Soyboy and pajama boy is trying to paint exceptions for some ruined men based on tradlarp-type signalling…. no? This doesn’t work. Women perceive the sociology naturally. These ‘men’ don’t see how boring they are, like male versions of Cringe Carrie.

Just watch TOWIE to see how it’s all failed men, culturally. Masculinity = Degeneracy.

Generally:

We might be individual, but we’re not special. We’re all human so nobody is special. Individuals are rare because most people have no personality, they’re bland conformists, copycats of the rare individuals. They waffle on and whine about their dull little lives and their mundane baseless “philosophies” as if they’re Kant himself. They have no wit, not even sufficient to see how absurd they are. They are lost boys, stuck in teenage 60s marketing notions of rebellion for the rest of their sad little lives. They drive anyone with half a brain away and all their friends have nothing to talk about to one another. All you hear is a mindless repetition of ‘current events’. Over the years, they grow apart or pick up other vices to have in common. They’re base minds. There’s nothing to make of them, there is no treasure and they keep seeking within but the narcissist is hollow. They’ll die, before they find it. A self is made through struggle and self-awareness, two things the child-mind flees.. Navel-gazing is not the same. They spend money on all the silly bro trends and complain they haven’t any. They’re self-indulgent parenting their inner child. They flee duty of all kinds, even a commitment to ‘beloved’ pets, whom they dump frequently on people or in a shelter (alone, scared) to go on debauched ‘holidays’. This is the peak, this is the best their lives will ever be and they sense it. They know their low ways will ruin them one day, soon and the concept of masculine responsibility they reject as oppression. They do not love, they cannot love. Pair bonding is sneered at, like the autist also. They are shells instead of men. Disloyal dilettantes to any proclaimed cause, complete with bitchy, pointless in-fighting. Do not think you can help the husk, they decorate their bodies like a preening rat in a lab. Otherwise, who would listen?
There’s nothing there, there’s no one in there.
They’re nothing. Walking, talking nothing.
If you see it, they’ll hate you. Secretly, they hate everyone, especially if they’re happy.

They’re solipsists in practice, utterly dead inside.

It’s a generation of lost boys. However, they deserve it. They’re actually hedonists.

They’re slowly all realising they’ll never all be Tony Stark/ Bruce Wayne/ a rapper, whatever. They have a feeble, regressed sense of potential. They think they’re still fifteen. They actually think, as adults, that “one day” they’ll ‘grow up’ and become a superhero. It’s magical thinking, delusions of grandeur. They’re actually crazy.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/03/half-of-millennials-think-theyll-be-rich-data-says-otherwise.html

Millennials are less wealthy than most previous generations were at the same age, the report finds, which doesn’t bode well for their chances of becoming millionaires, especially since many of them are also skittish about investing.

They’re going on their retirement holidays NOW.

This is it, peak degenerate.

Binge-drinking, yoga, “not like the other guys”.

Still, lots of young people remain confident, the TD Ameritrade survey found. Over 70% of millennial men say they will be millionaires at some point, while 38% of millennial women report being similarly optimistic.

They’re delaying their life – marriage, kids, anything, and they’ll just – delay, forever.

The One-day generation. They’ll die having never lived.

Over 70% of those men.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/millennials-are-delusional-about-how-rich-theyre-going-to-be-2018-12-06

And a survey released earlier this year from TD Ameritrade that found that more than half of millennials expect to be millionaires in their lifetimes, with more than four in 10 saying it’ll happen by 50.

NAMALT duh, we know. If you aren’t triggered like a dudebro, I know. Again, self-awareness.

But she explains that millennials in particular “have incredibly powerful new belief systems about not capping how much money can be earned” as “there are so many careers that were nonexistent even 10 years ago” — which may help explain why they think seven figures is possible.

Still, if women had delusions of Fairy Godmother, you would’ve definitely heard about it by now.

Income relies on IQ and most low IQ people are men. They are in for a shock.

Anyone who claims to care about ‘the future of men’ would address this. It’s pleasure island except they’ll just turn into asses. That’s the end.

They don’t love.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larissafaw/2015/07/28/watch-out-ladies-millennial-men-are-gold-diggers/

They are the very gold diggers they complain about. Classic narc projection.

 Two in 10 single adults can be classified as “gold diggers” saying that they would marry somebody for their money, according to DDB’s Life Style Study. And 54% of these gold diggers are men. And young. Whereas gold digger women are more likely to be part of the boomer generation (40% are female vs. 27% male), gold digger males are significantly more likely to be part of the Millennial generation (40% are male vs. 25% female).

Sperm is cheap, guys.

Men are just lazy. Thank God I’m not American. They’re not men, they’re males. Man up?

That phrase alone –

they are so weak, they refuse to call women, women. Broflakes. Useless broflakes.

Hell, just GROW up. Women aren’t going to rescue you, that has never happened in history. Men are not damsels. I dunno, get a sex change?

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Shame is your conscience

Shame isn’t something that comes from outside. It’s only triggered.

Alongside guilt, regret, contrition and remorse, they are emotions caused and produced and experienced in yourself.

If you feel shame for doing a thing, you should.

The system is fully operational.

And then you should also learn from it, by not doing it again.

Or there’ll be even more shame, however repressed, in your future.

Are there shameless people? Yes. They have bigger problems, believe me. See title.

Anyone who refuses to grow up is wasting year after year of their life they could’ve fully experienced.

Sometimes you won’t feel good things.

Welcome to being a good (or better) person.

Shame is based on actions. If you didn’t do a wrong thing, what’s the problem?

Shame is not disapproval. Bad people disapprove of good ones, it infers nothing of the moral high ground as an opinion and people with the least moral authority carp “only God can judge me!” and “how dare you say that, who are you to say that?” or “you’re (noun) shaming!” which is just… descriptive.

Yes, shaming a man for doing something wrong is valid.

Nobody shames a man for existing.

They shame him for being bad at the man thing. This isn’t about your genitals, it’s about trying to absolve yourself of responsibility for your own life using your genitals and trying to foist the blame (agency) onto other people. Otherwise, make a penis hat and go on a march.

Sorry, forgot you already did that. I’m picturing some middle-class boat shoes, bad shorts and a single, lonely tiki torch in the corner of a room, never to be lit again.

It’s funny they’re even trying this with other men now.

Oh, does he hate men too? Nice thought-terminating cliche, morons.

Because guess what – the person who notices and tries to draw attention to your faults and improves you – they care, and best of all, they’re trying to help you.

What would you prefer? Mollycoddling?

Should men/women/both lavish praise on you, fake praise and humour you like a little kid? Do the equivalent of praise your crappy crayon drawing?

Holding men to a high standard isn’t a bad thing. They wouldn’t say it if they didn’t think you could do it.

This “man shaming” thing

[that won’t ever ever be a thing, men aren’t shamed enough for the bad things they do compared to women]

is more nonsensical than the SJW’s slut shaming. It isn’t woman shaming, is it?

I’ve never, ever been slut-shamed. Guess why!

[Women have tried to start rumours, guess what they were. Didn’t work.]

And to be totally fair:

So it isn’t being a man, don’t blame other men or assume they’re like you. Part of the problem is blaming the collective but trying to take credit for simple things as an individual. That’s what little kids do.

And it won’t make you happier. As people who have overcome that phase have been trying to tell you!

Bitching about man shaming is proving the very reason you should be shamed.

Pic for clarity:

It isn’t about being a man though. Is it?

You know.

Deep down, you know.

If you think any group is beyond reproach or question, go get a plushie lobster in a Peterson-esque safe space and cry into a copy of Fight Club.

“Someone, somewhere, doesn’t like me!”

If you had a life, you wouldn’t care.

This post could have been a lot meaner.

Undiluted Satanism

https://cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com/2018/06/02/the-liberals-metamorphosis/

Using the forms of Christianity, the devil is able to ape the good in order to advance his satanic agenda……

At the turn of the 19th century the people of Europe could not absorb undiluted Satanism. So Satan came to them in a diluted form…..

Our culture was consecrated to Christ; it is now consecrated to Satan….

The Self is God and hedonism is your church. It isn’t a belief, it’s an excuse. A child doesn’t believe they deserved to binge ten cookies, they’re lying. We give them a small amount of give because they’re learning to control impulses. What is the adult’s excuse? None.

As such, complicit in repeated iniquities, they can only blame themselves.

You did a bad thing everyone warned you about and bad things happened?

Who fucking cares? You wanted that to happen, it’s called consequences.

The path to Hell is shiny and alluring.

“You can be a good person while doing bad things.”

How the Hell do adults fall for this?

Charlton said in a post “what we call adulthood is not ‘maturity’ but merely a sustained and degenerate adolescence.”

Exactly.

Then again, Trump and co. have done nothing about the ongoing Christian genocide. Even Hillary mentioned this, guys.

Why so open? They think the free money will last forever and they have all the institutions on their side including media. It’s a network, a coven, an unholy alliance.

If God is the Father, Satan is the creepy uncle you think you can trust until he screws you. Don’t intervene when he comes for them. He’s worst to his own.

Signs of an Emotionally Immature Adult

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201611/10-signs-emotionally-immature-adult

Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome, when it occurs in adulthood, is also known as Peter Pan Syndrome.”
Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome is related to, but not identical to, Emperor Syndrome, a term is primarily used to describe Chinese boys with no siblings who behave like little tyrants.”

Unfair, Princess Syndrome is more common with the Chinese women at present. You don’t see Chinese men giggling and running round big Chanel stores with their friends on Daddy’s credit card.

“Little Princes and Princesses, as I define them, are grown men or women who act as if they are selfish children, narcissistic teenagers, or irresponsible young adults, and feel entitled to behave as they see fit. Following are 10 traits typical of someone living with Little Prince or Princess Syndrome. (For simplicity’s sake, I use the term Little Prince below, and refer to the role of mothers, not father, but the signs are applicable to all genders.)”

A selection;

He acts like a child, a teenager, or a person who is much younger than he is. He might throw temper tantrums or party all night with people 10 years younger than him.

He acts as if women should serve him. He expects to be taken care of and be pampered on demand. He will happily take but never give.

He cannot maintain a long-term, stable romantic relationship. Former partners end up becoming his enemies or new playmates.

He is commitment-phobic in nearly all areas of life—despite having a needy attachment style. It can take him six months to commit to buying a new sofa.

I have seen that.
My words-
“It’s a sofa, you can dump it.”

They see their possessions as an extension of them.
Possessions include people.

If you don’t make them look good, you’re gone.
The excuse is usually pleasing others, so they also look good to you. B.S.

Btw, Asians invented ghosting. You made less money? You missed a promotion? They forget to send you a dinner party invite. It makes you wonder if they’re capable of the friendship thing with one another too.

He is often passive-aggressive, meaning he has a tendency to engage in an indirect expression of hostility through acts such as subtle insults, sullen behavior, stubbornness, or a deliberate failure to accomplish required tasks.

They are not subtle.
Have you ever met a subtle man?… I rest my case.

He is a narcissist or exhibits a childish selfishness. If something is even mildly inconvenient, he will resist doing it.

Emotional child.

He rarely thinks anything is his fault. He blames everyone around him for everything that goes wrong in his life—even his mother if he can’t find another scapegoat.”

Victim blaming, victim mentality… tendency to complain about victim culture because they think they’re entitled to that pity, not that it’s wrong. Whiny and lots of nagging, like an old woman.

If you find this useful, you might find these too.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/is-america/201601/con-artists-and-their-marks

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-flux/201610/9-classic-traits-manipulative-people

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201609/meet-the-real-narcissists-theyre-not-what-you-think
“For example, he suggests, some narcissists can be of the “communal” variety and actually devote their lives to helping others. They might even agree with such statements as “I’m the most helpful person I know,” or “I will be known for the good deeds I have done.” “Everyone has met grandiosely altruistic martyrs, self-sacrificing to the point where you can’t stand to be in the room with them,” Malkin says.

And there are highly introverted, or “vulnerable,” narcissists. These individuals feel they are more temperamentally sensitive than others. They react poorly to even gentle criticism and need constant reassurance. The way they feel special might actually be negative: They may see themselves as the ugliest person at the party or feel like a misunderstood genius in a world that refuses to recognize their gifts.”

They can’t back up their claims and if you compare them, they’re usually average. Pointing this out triggers narc rage.

They don’t just ‘use’ others, they use others as…. it’s instrumental.

They cannot self-regulate, they use other people as emotional tampons (especially men) and require excess ‘take’ and their giving is inferior, low quality but they over-value it because *they* are dispensing it. Thinking you’re special is in your actions, not a set of words. Tend to idolize others too, broken perceptions.

What PUAs get wrong about ‘alpha wolves’

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/pick-up-artists-dont-understand-what-alpha-even-meansas-evidenced-by-wolves

Everything?

Alpha means being a Patriarch – married, traditional, monogamous, loyal, fertile.

They’re trying desperately to signal K-selected traits with an r-sexuality.
That’s why it fails. No, you fail, you’re inferior socially, found wanting.
It’s easier to signal being a good father and run (cowards) than to actually become a man.
There is also the matter that Alpha is an animal aristocracy, not only are you born into it but high fitness isn’t limited to males, there are Alpha females obviously because the Alphas of the pack are K-selected aka the Alpha Male only lies with his female. This isn’t a lion/pride arrangement and in prides, the lionesses hunt (work).
Protean displays as mixed messages?
Protean displays are done by defensive cowards when faced with a predator…. actually yeah, PUA < most women.

‘But it’s the alpha/beta hierarchy that’s really having a renaissance online. And its current use completely ignores the science behind it. So I went to a wolf park to study their “on the prowl” behavior.
“[Alpha is] a term that was coined in biology, just the first Greek letter in the Greek alphabet, just a convenience thing,” says Monty Sloan, senior animal curator and staff photographer at Wolf Park. “And it’s been kind of undermined by public perception of what that might mean.” First of all, wolf packs have two alphas: a male and a female. “There’s always two alphas in a pack. That’s what defines a pack. The pack might be two wolves, but socially, they are dominant. They are alphas. If more wolves enter the pack, they’ll submit to those two. And what you’ll see is a linear hierarchy develop.”‘

Like a ….class system?

Alpha is a power couple.

If you’re not married to an alpha while being one yourself, you’re not Alpha with a capital ‘A’, at most potential.

I’ve been trying to correct them on the ethology for years.

‘These two alphas are usually a breeding pair, and in wolves found in the Midwest, wolf packs are usually a nuclear family. This is why some wolf researchers have abandoned the term alpha altogether, like David Mech, whose book The Wolf popularized the idea of an alpha wolf in the 1970s. “[T]hey are merely breeders, or parents, and that’s all we call them today,” he writes on his academic website. Rather than one alpha male having some harem of lady-wolves at his beck and call because he’s so strong and butch, the alpha male is daddy.
You don’t fight to get to the alpha position, you usually inherit it. You’re usually in the right place at the right time,” says Sloan. “All you have to do is have offspring, and the offspring are going to grow up submitting to their parents. That’s all it takes.”‘

K-SELECTION.
Genetic superiority, proven by wits.

Genetic suicides or deadbeats can NEVER, EVER BE ALPHA.

I’ve mentioned the Darwin of why on here, it’s the Parental Investment theory.

Do they listen? No. That would involve real self-improvement and the sunk cost fallacy of bullshit e-books has wormed into their brain. Love is not a game unless you’re crazy. Taylor Swift crazy.

‘According to To Be An Alpha, a website dedicated to helping men become the alphas of their pack, alpha males that take control are “vocal and loud” and “aren’t afraid to get physical.”‘

Obnoxious and boyishly immature? Entitled?
They’re trying to rebrand a gobby chav teen as the epitome of masculinity?

‘Dominant breeding wolves aren’t afraid to get physical, but they don’t start fights either. “You don’t typically see a dominant wolf going around, parading around acting tough and aggressively confronting the other wolves,” says Sloan. “When you do see that, it’s usually a sign of a lack of confidence. Ironically, the animal is not very confident if it’s doing that, and it’s not comfortable at all.”‘

Freud. Signalling masculinity, like talking about it, means you aren’t. You’re lying and hoping people won’t forget you exist. That’s narcissistic, that’s solipsistic (wait, no, just egocentric and selfish). The abuse of ‘solipsism’, which funny at first as intellectual posturing, now grates.

Any man who must say I am King, isn’t a King?

If you insist on picking a sex that leads the Alpha debate, it’s female.

Another major misconception is that alpha males are dominant over alpha females. “The dominance between the sexes is not that important to them,” says Sloan.
The wolves I visited at Wolf Park were a group of siblings: Kanti, Bicho, and Fiona. Kanti is the alpha male, Fiona is the alpha female. She is also dominant over Kanti. “If there is an altercation between the female and Kanti, Kanti is on his back submitting,” says Sloan. “Even though she is much smaller than him, she is the dominant wolf in the pack.” This is typical of the packs in Wolf Park.’

tfw literal animals are more socially intelligent than you, Roosh V
It’s Bateman’s Principle, the mother makes babies and in K-terms, that’s all that matters. Eggs > Sperm
Women are more selective, women need to be protected but this is from other males, sexual competition.
How many men would die for their woman/children? How many of those are men?
Yet they claim they want a Patriarchy. Surrrre. Patriarchy isn’t male liberty, it’s male enslavement to women. At least, in Darwinian terms but at least the good men survive biologically. Women’s lib was liberation for the sexuality of men to fuck and run. Sexual Revolution was terrible for women, great for men. If you take away our vote and retain your own, all the legs will be shutting. And then other men will take yours, based on history.

“It turns out, not even peacocks truly peacock. We may think their visual display is pretty enchanting, but peahens aren’t always looking at the display. They’re listening. Peacocks vibrate their tail feathers in two distinct patterns; they twerk, essentially.”

shh, I enjoyed letting them make fools of themselves and it makes them easier to avoid
God Bless Ed Hardy for that.

Peacocking is actually about male attractiveness, genetic beauty i.e. the gym does nothing, lookism is real.

Bad parents upset to be lumped in with terrorists

EQUALITY

PROFILING IS RACIST

YOUR CHILD MAY BE A SUICIDE BOMBER

http://mashable.com/2017/03/21/tablet-ban-parents/?utm_cid=a-rr-watercooler#y9EQ1gq6Diq0

Your kids shouldn’t be electronics-dependent, it’s literally an addiction, terrible for their eyesight (JAPAN) and the Apple people don’t let their kids have iPads. It’s a form of abuse to give them digital whiskey.
..Would they rather the kids get murdered?
Wait, it only applies to parents bad enough to take their minors to dangerous countries.
Nevermind, nobody important.
“The ban could mean a much less enjoyable flight for travelers coming from the Muslim-majority countries impacted.”
If only we could solve this terrorist problem overnight… some kind of ban would be useful…
It isn’t about their kids, they’re the children glued to a screen. Peter Pan adults.

I thought the Apple Pencil was a parody video.

Commitment phobia in men

Came across this by chance.

https://www.elsaelsa.com/astrology/men-dont-want-to-partner-because-women-are-toxic/

You shouldn’t be blaming women for the decisions of men. This applies to homosexuals too.

Men are responsible for their own f-ups and they’re failing society by refusing to commit. Boo hoo child of divorce, grow up! Blaming your parents, seriously? How old are they?

Men are meant to lead, including in establishing families. They are lazy. That is why society rots, weak men.

Just Be Yourself is terrible advice. They expect to be held to no external standard they wouldn’t pass. Trophies, get ya trophies! Hold them to a classic standard they can’t pass? You’re a cunt, at least a bitch. No, really, that’s the level they sink to. Children with male lusts. I want a reality show where we send these Nice Guys on dates and watch them being rude, let a studio audience vote on how they truly behave. They’ll deny, deny, deny. The audience is biased. They’re never wrong, like a toddler.

They claim to treat women with respect…. only to make a sex joke, call a girl who wasn’t interested ‘a whore’ (???), fornicate and lie about it, cheat…. they think we’re stupid. Especially considering this thing called Internet.

It’s the ghetto model of courtship which is to say: trash. No fathers. R-types claiming to be reliable, successful and responsible….we can see you’re not.

There’s a serious attitude problem where they think they’re perfect ‘just the way they are’. OK, if you’re a Disney Princess…

Do you want to date an emotional toddler? Complete with tantrums and gaslighting (I never said that text you are showing me). They’re insane.

That’s why even their girlfriends run. Narcissism has a mask that lasts 6-18 months. Under it, they’re ugly.

Commitment phobia is a classic of men and culture reinforces this.

That men can’t afford to keep a wife (they expect she’ll provide for him but also stay at home, be Madonna and Whore, mother and porn star, have at least 4/5 jobs at once – cook, cleaner, hostess, bar friend, primary caregiver, insanity!) and economically, they can’t afford a family.

They refuse to admit this poverty has anything to do with the Gen Y/Z work ethic.

Sure.

They are anti-traditional but want the safety net of it.

It’s now common to hear from perma-single men;

“Why should I buy a woman dinner?”

  1. it’s a choice?

Literally, that’s the point of a date, the man proves he is worthy, as suitor. That’s all, 100%, what a date is. When you ask a woman on a date, you are offering to do exactly that, no more or less. Everyone sniggers at these idiots behind their backs, it’s retarded to the point of humiliation. Every woman hearing that, our eyes widen and we cringe. It’s like hearing a feminazi. They want without giving. Reciprocity is found in birds, FFS.

They refute that fact. Like feminists questioning gender norms (that’s what it is). They deny a male gender role but claim to be masculine? ….. no. Certainly, it puts off anyone traditional in a hundred-mile radius like sexual mustard gas.

But all the issues addressed herein are blatant and disrespectful (almost disdainful) of women in that implication. Women will never want to breed with a misogynist, that would be crazy-stupid. Automatically, any wife material woman will think ‘cad’ if a man doesn’t think she’s worthy a minor social ritual. He won’t ever provide,that is a Bad Man, to shirk his end of the equation, and we don’t wanna be welfare queens. Then with age, wrinkles and losing hair, they still go after the teenage women who always ignored them. …Losers.

Love isn’t a numbers game by age or approaches.

They bring a pornographic misogyny to the table. You’ve seen them rant, right? Women are higher EQ, we understand their psyche from their speeches. Yeah, we hear you. Wish we didn’t. That’s why none of us wanna date you. Cooties metaphors should be left at school. Mixed social settings are a rehearsal for coupled life and 21st century man is far more rude than the average feminist. They just don’t know it and we quietly avoid them.

They complain there are no ladies…..

There are. But you’re not a gentleman. Hence, Nice Guy memes. .,,They aren’t nice, they’re users. They think we’re stupid, while knowing about the EQ thing. Dissonance.

For a flipped example of the above question.

They have become like feminists – the worst kind: “why do I need to look pretty on a date?”

That’s the kind of dumb where they dunno social conventions aren’t a choice. Do it or not, no customizing. It’s like something a five year-old would say. “Why do I need to open the door for her? She should open it for me!*” children are meant to be inconsiderate, though, you grow out of it. *Those are not the values of a traditional man.

The psychology is interesting – they get everything they want from ‘girlfriends’ aka the idea of a GF makes a wife redundant. Legally, men are shirking their duty and there is a widespread maturity problem in all ages and both sexes today. It’s simply apparent in men because young men are failing to thrive on purpose, preferring porn and video games.

Disloyalty is on the rise, thanks to gay culture infiltrating straights (Grindr, Tindr).

Cheating is supposed to get you divorced. 10 commandments.

Peter Pans are a known issue, look at the men over 21 who care as much about the future as a 13yo girl (psychopathic high time pref) and act like teenagers (OMG the slang, so wrong).

They’re trying to demand impossible things of women (look like a supermodel, don’t be vain, be wise, don’t age, have expensive taste but pay for yourself because we love you). Women are leaving (most of) them on the shelf because the effete modern male is NOT a man and has NOTHING to offer. Look at them sometime.

Talk to them, ask them what they’ve got going for them, what gets women.

…It’ll get awkward.

If you were a woman, honestly, would you marry any of them? Give up all potential…. for that?

Worst part?

They blame women for their incompetence at being men.

That’s why they’re alone. As a man in all traditional metrics, how do they do?

Not fake muscles like breast implants, fake masculinity looks vain and gay (cos it is).

Professional reputation, any savings, desire for children, will to parent and be a good father, impulse control, no temper, no resentment of women. Things historically considered basic.

Most can’t even speak to women without insulting them (to later ask with truly autistic self-awareness ‘why do they avoid me?’) , creep around, lech, openly deride what is feminine and good and expect a 10 to plop out the Heavens just for them.

Negging attracts the damaged ones. They’re totally insecure together at least.

If no woman is good enough, their masculinity will never be tested.

If they never marry, they can’t fail as a husband.

Cowards. 9/10. Cowards.

Petty, childish, nauseatingly evasive from an adult.

Women are waiting for them to self-correct.

They want the best of both worlds in all cases or they check out. Swallowed equality propaganda, but men must prove themselves to women to breed. They try to get women to qualify then wonder why only the masculine ones apply?? They don’t want to provide anything, so they receive nothing. They are spoiled and entitled, whiny and bitchy like other women, the worst ones.. the ones we avoid even for friendship. I said the opposite here once, it applies vice versa; if women wanted someone whiny, bitchy, effeminate, we’d be lesbians!

We don’t want another woman, even if he has a penis. Also porn isn’t real and no woman will ever worship it. Don’t put pussy on a pedestal, inverted. No Mighty Phallus expectations.

Your body doesn’t make you masculine, gender is MENTAL.

They are mentally deficient in this. How many can hang a picture? Change oil? Take a punch?

Men, 101. Their grandfathers would be disgusted and ashamed.

This is common sense.

They do not know this. Women resent needing to teach a male age-peer the fundamentals, we’re not Mom. That is creepy.

They aren’t worth the effort. Part of the male fitness test is initiative. They don’t want to do some male duties? They’re broken, like society.

TLDR: They’re wholly selfish but can’t even take care of themselves. A woman wants a husband, not a moaning child.

They are not husband material, they deny such a thing exists (very progressive) because they’d fail any fair test; they’re not even men. They’re male children that survived to 18 without maturing. I hated typing this, makes me fear for the West.

It’s so bitter and narcissistic raging, they’re seriously talking about cloning. …. they couldn’t afford.

Vice celebrates the self-sterilizing

We should be paying them. One-time lump fee. Just enough for a great holiday.
Weed out the high time preference. £4-5k? Conditional on their signature that they’ll never try to reverse it or otherwise breed, or at least won’t take welfare if/when they do.

If they aren’t responsible enough to make this choice at 18, they aren’t responsible enough to consent to sex. The schools should be blamed, since they were nowhere else.

https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/the-people-choosing-to-be-sterilised-in-their-twenties

Please make this the hot new trend.

It’s still eugenics if they do it to themselves.

Congratulations Roosh and the other genetic suicides, you’re in the fine company of these lovely ladies.

“Life isn’t just about reproduction.”

Thank you for not breeding.

cool nothing shocks me scientist indiana jones calm haha amused

I bet the majority were already sterile due to undiagnosed STDs.

As one guy put it “your mutations end with you!”

Essentially they’re recognizing their existence is a mistake of nature.

Tell me Peter Pan Syndrome isn’t a thing.

What would they say to people who think 19, or even 29, is too young to make a decision so final? That this is a narcissistic lifestyle choice designed to hold onto their not-quite adult status? 

Katelin assuredly disagrees.

K

“I want time alone, time with my partner and time to travel and spend money on luxury. And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that,” she says.


how is that not-

“My generation live in a broken world. We come from broken homes and have broken minds and bodies. Many of us just don’t want to reproduce. It’s my life, and I’m not hurting anyone.

Still a vector for sexual diseases though, huh?

Never mention that?

They never want other tissues and nerves cut, no, that’s crazy!

superman drinking give up nope

Super-gonorrhea will have a long time to incubate in these people, before spreading to the normal population.