We used to hang people for this

While obviously I do mean the paedophile, I also mean the entire family. Know a tree by its fruit. The signs must’ve been there and they knew what they let into that house. Did he like anime? Did he have an Asian ‘girlfriend’ at some point? Did he start trying to change the definition and follow some naturalistic fallacy that any woman who bleeds is fair ‘game’? The signs were there. At no point do the parents blame themselves, despite this ‘man’ living at home. Under their care. What would this be called? An honour-killing of some description, wouldn’t it?
One of the few cases where abortion is not only moral, it is vital.
Followed with the sterilization of all parties involved.

Islam manages to dig lower on incestuous child abuse

NEW ISLAMIC FATWA: A father’s lust for his daughter is not a sin if the daughter is over 9 years old

wow omg omfg how can you be so dumb really stupid fyi

Hey, it’s just their culture, right?

So when a gypsy thieves or a Mafia boss murders, it’s legal?

Australian judge thinks incest is totally acceptable

coverage here

“A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings. [only siblings?]

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted. [they call that a slippery slope]

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this “rationale” was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” the judge said.

“If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

“By that stage they are both mature adults,” the judge said.

“The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become ‘free’ when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we’ve come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful.” [Common Law doesn’t stop existing]

The comments were labelled misogynistic and “completely disgraceful” by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

“The reference to abortion is particularly repellent,” she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved. [I agree.]

“The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal,” she told The Sydney Morning Herald.” [this response is called natural disgust]

Animals next.