Link: mixed race marriage and biological problems

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

Parents do not give equal shares of genes to their child, this is a myth.

The party with more recessive genes e.g. white, will be less than 50% of a genetic parent to their mixed child.

“In evolutionary terms, one could argue that mixed-race marriages are maladaptive in that they reduce a person’s overall genetic fitness – i.e. passing on copies of one’s own genes.  In a multiracial marriage or relationship, one is showing altruism toward a partner who shares fewer genes than a co-ethnic would share.  A parent will also share fewer genes with a multiracial child than with a same-race child.”

Study the in/fertility of the mixed kids, that’s also a doozy.

If it’s well known their organs don’t work properly, that includes the gonads.

Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the “genetic distances” separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danish, and the Japanese 59 times greater. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.”

Hey sub-race, they still won’t discuss you.

Using the genetic distances outlined above, let’s look at two hypothetical multiracial marriages.

An English Man and a Japanese Woman:  As genetic distance figures above note, an English man would be around 59 times more closely related to a Dane than to his Japanese wife. 

aka the joke in this

Why would you willingly take on a genetic disability, to be trendy?

Bloody anti-white cucks. Well, at least they impair their own idiotic genetics.

Regarding the individual’s genetic investment in the second example above, Frank Salter (On Genetic Interests, pg. 261) writes:

“For a person of English ethnicity, choosing an English spouse over a Dane gains less than one percent fitness. But choosing an English spouse over a Bantu, one yields a fitness gain of 92 percent….  The same applies in reverse order, so that a Bantu who chooses another Bantu instead of someone of English ethnicity has 92% more of his or her genes in offspring as a result.  It is almost the equivalent to having twice the number of children with an English spouse.

Genetic preservation, also to be encouraged in other races.

If you want to annoy a Europhile, point out they’re pushing for the preservation of the white race.

Thus assortative mating by ethnicity can have large fitness benefits, the largest derived from choosing mates within geographic races.”

In other words and general terms, a white mother will be almost as twice as closely related to a child with a white father versus a child with a black father.  Because same-race parents share more genes,  each parent is likely to see more of his or her genes in the offspring even if they are not passed on directly.  For example, if the father has gene X and doesn’t pass it on directly to his son, there’s a good chance his same-race spouse will have gene X and pass it on, so the son will indirectly possess the father’s gene X.

Noting phenotype in mixed-race children, each parent would more closely resemble co-ethnics than their own child, especially the white mother, since whites tend to have recessive traits for appearance.  (A person only 1/16 black will often still have visible and prominent black features.)

And appearance does matter.  The fact that mixed-race children do not resemble the parents, esp. the fairer parent, seems to be an issue of concern, although not widely discussed.

Hey, you wanted attention. You got it.

it is unsurprising that mixed-race children suffer more problems of identity and health.  For instance, mixed-race people are less likely to survive organ transplants, especially bone marrow transplants.  In general, mixed-race people have more health problems. A study by J. Richard Udry notes:

“A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.”

It’s child abuse, if we’re honest.

For the parent’s fetish or vanity.

In other words, an argument could be made that mixed-race families are maladaptive — both for the parents and the children  — and undermine one’s genetic interests.

Hybrid weakness, it seems.

Mixed race couples provoke disgust

http://www.washington.edu/news/2016/08/17/study-finds-bias-disgust-toward-mixed-race-couples/

“That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level,” Skinner said.

linking

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116300555

“Yuck, you disgust me!” Affective bias against interracial couples’

“Study 2 provides evidence that images of interracial couples evoke a neural disgust response among observers – as indicated by increased insula activation relative to images of same-race couples.”

The real science behind the “beige is beautiful” movement.
They never feed the faces into computer models like real beauty studies because the result is uncanny. It would be rejected.

Attitude surveys are nothing to brain studies. People lied in study 1 to avoid arrest.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304491556_Yuck_You_Disgust_Me_Affective_Bias_Against_Interracial_Couples
http://www.academia.edu/26989394/_Yuck_You_Disgust_Me_Affective_Bias_Against_Interracial_Couples

Nobody’s jealous, it’s biologically proven they’re disgusted.
Asking them to be anything else is oppressive to their biology.

Trump is turning my boyfriend into a Nazi

THAT’S BASICALLY THE TITLE, COME ON.

http://www.xojane.com/sex/interracial-relationships-after-trump-election

By year two, things weren’t so easy. With the string of rampant police brutality, horrific sexual assault stories coming out, white nationalists infiltrating our government, and growing Islamophobia surfacing, I had found myself side-eyeing all straight white men more and more. It’s like everywhere I look, a white straight male is doing something detrimental to people like me and getting away with it. The patriarchy is heavy, and all of the shit that comes along with it has a way of clouding the way you look at everything and everyone — even the person you love. Being “woke” has its drawbacks, and being conscious makes the world a little more sinister.

This whole thing reads like I wrote it.

Poe’s Law.

Poe’s Law.

crying laughter lmao

Whites least likely to marry outside their own race

2015 USA data. The propaganda hasn’t worked.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/

7%, same figure both men and women.

What’s the bet they’re low SMV and cashing their chips?
That they can’t make it with their own due to some defect or have that freaky self loathing going on? [Despite knowing their kids will still look like them.]
Not to mention the slavery fetish. You know that’s a thing.
Sometimes you can just look at them in the street and see that’s the thing.

laughing lol haha liar liar

We’re onto you. I love how the internet has pretty much established that white fat/ugly women marry/date black guys, but totally ignore the male data.

Like, guys, we have eyes.

It’s fine if you can’t make it with white women, not everyone can, but at least admit it.
Everyone else can see, believe me.

Mixed race couple divorce rates

h/t AlphaGamePlan

What goes unmentioned is the timing of divorce.

Once an Asian woman has her white babies, the man is redundant.

Recently, there has been a spate of Thai brides cheating on or divorcing their loser owners.

It’s magical.

oh damn wow ah

You can’t own a woman. Asians are worse than Whites.
Have you seen a middle-aged Asian woman hen-pecking the man? Who’s in charge there?