The recent history of PC censorship

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com

He also sells the book through official channels, which would be nice to buy if you like the material.

It’s also easier to read than this free version.

Contents page for a taste;

Contents (of paper version)

Why I use the term Political Correctness, instead of Liberalism or Socialism? …………………………………………………………………………i
Introduction……………………………………………………………………. iii
Political correctness no longer a joke… ………………………………… 1
Escape from habituation into nihilism …………………………………… 2
The irrationality of PC ……………………………………………………….. 7
Imaginary enemies preferred……………………………………………….. 9
Why is PC so shallow, flippant and reckless? ……………………….. 12
Political correctness, the intellectual elite and the mass media …. 15
The mass media and the memory hole …………………………………. 17
Fashion and PC ………………………………………………………………. 20
Old Left – New Left ………………………………………………………… 22
Nature of modern mass media ……………………………………………. 25
Mass media as social cognition ………………………………………….. 28
The immunity of PC to reason …………………………………………… 29
PC depends on both the mass media and an intellectual elite …… 31
The impossibility of neutrality …………………………………………… 32
The proper question – whom to favour? ………………………………. 35
Assuming neutrality is impossible ………………………………………. 37
Good causes and good intentions ……………………………………….. 39
The moral exemplar of PC ethics ……………………………………….. 41
Is anybody safe? ……………………………………………………………… 43
Safety for victim group members ……………………………………….. 46
Life as a supervised game …………………………………………………. 47
What matters most – PC or societal function? ………………………. 49
Virtue in political correctness = altruism, un-selfishness…………. 52
Disinterested altruism and moral superiority ………………………… 56
The insanity of pure abstract altruism………………………………….. 59
Immune to evidence ………………………………………………………… 61
Indifference to outcomes ………………………………………………….. 63
Takeover by the PC elite – ten summary points …………………….. 65
Not fundamentally egalitarian, after all ……………………………….. 70
The definition of happiness under PC………………………………….. 73
The Principle of Inversion ………………………………………………… 74
PC Utopia ……………………………………………………………………… 76
Atomic individuals, atomic acts …………………………………………. 77
All groups seen as interest groups ………………………………………. 78
PC-favoured groups are assumed to be weak and controllable …. 80
PC not fundamentally „multicultural‟ ………………………………….. 82
Orthodox religion is immune to PC incentives ……………………… 84
PC as a Christian heresy …………………………………………………… 86
Western civilization cannot be saved…………………………………… 89
The millennium-deep roots of political correctness ………………… 91
Could resurgent nationalism save Western civilization from PC? 94
Characteristics of a new secular nationalism ………………………… 99
Could a party of „common sense‟ replace political correctness? 103
CS v PC ………………………………………………………………………. 105
What is The Good? ………………………………………………………… 109
Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good … 114
The Good versus The Better ……………………………………………. 117
Can the desire to end suffering be the primary motivation? ……. 119
The world is not enough …………………………………………………. 122
Can‟t we simply subtract PC from modernity? ……………………. 124
PC and „original sin‟ ………………………………………………………. 126
Faith in abstract systems …………………………………………………. 128
Why don‟t you convert to political correctness? ………………….. 131
How to be non-PC …………………………………………………………. 134
Postscript …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Note to the reader ………………………………………………………….. 137

I bolded the recently-relevant topics, he isn’t called paranoid now!

Oh, but this well-researched, well-written book was published before SJWAL and the guy’s actually white and really academic, with a history of contribution in academia, so don’t be surprised you somehow never heard of it among the so-called red pill / woke / alternative / whatever internet that totally isn’t controlled opposition.

Totally.

I’m sure they just forgot to mention it at the apropos moments for half a decade.

As it was all coming to fruition.

Epigraph

This book is intended for normal, mainstream, secular, modern, disaffected and alienated intellectuals; those who are complicit in political correctness (as are all intellectuals) but who are (when not distracted, drugged or dreaming) in a state of despair.

This book will, I hope, help such people to understand their condition, and present the likely choices. It will not help them to save their world (too late for that) but it may help them to save their souls.

I’m sure they just “forgot”.

You cannot understand the nature of the Beast without this book, it truly is fundamental.

Tagging as QAnon because it explains social media censorship.

A point about the Conservative cucks who want to keep the Sexual Revolution (so recent it’s in living memory).

People can only get away with this absurd claim to be defending Western Civilization (get away with it in their own minds, as much as the public arena) because Western Civilization is so obviously collapsing so fast and the perception that what will come after is probably going to be miserable for most people; and because this degeneration is being accelerated by an evil, blind and insane politically correct elite who apparently must be opposed – somehow – although with little chance of short-term success.

Blind? No, they have a giant eye.

Never attribute to stupidity what has a centuries-long trail of proof leading to malice.

What else are we supposed to believe? Year on year, it coincidentally went their way?

Trump’s victory triggers the brainwashed because in Hollywood, only the good win. If they win, they must be the good guys.

But the Secular Right is trying to keep its cake and to eat it: to retain the residual and declining bits of modernity, the counter-currents that it personally values (especially sexual freedom); but at the same time to dispense with PC – and PC is now the mainstream and dominant flow of modernity.

To kill PC in all its sprouting Hydra heads, you’d need to kill the body of what it protects.

Bye bye sexual “freedom” as the price of civility.

If you want civilization, the decadence has gotta die.

Austerity was previously Labour’s policy for a reason.

I’d like to thank Planned Parenthood for Trump’s November victory. Without their tireless work to murder leftists, this push-back wouldn’t be possible. Abortion has replaced pandemic as a culling force in human populations.

Logically the insane degenerates deluded enough to feel entitled to both a virgin and a whore (and therefore, terrible marriages as they romance the mistress and deprive the wife with emotional abandonment) would immediately cause a severe shortage of women a la India, to say nothing of the women who’d reject the system and swear off men entirely. This is why the desires of weak-willed men don’t determine history or society, they can only destroy.

100% – 20% religious, spinster, 40% virgin probable child bride, 40% whore  or if they wanted more variety, using up the best women thus 70% whore, 30% bride and slaughtering women who rejected the slavery of forced unions.How quickly before the birth rate turns into an Indian sinkhole, like all the savage groups who did this in history before?

And they try to appeal to Darwin about this? Or moral superiority? What about all the abortions required by that system?

Kindly, there’d be at least a 25% shortage of women. What happens to the men? You can’t draft them, they won’t go or they’ll rebel or be useless. Now you’re overthrown by the shit-tier of your own sex. Like India.

AKA the guys who think they’d be better off in that society, not of the shit-tier themselves, aren’t smart either.

1 man for 1 woman is the best system and natural to this species.

As it is, a mutated flu of some sort would shortly dispatch most sluts, whatever their claimed politics, in the world. It doesn’t have to be purely an STD to be transmitted through close physical proximity (although it could combine with HPV’s genes). I don’t worry about them. They’re dead men walking. And contributing to the very drug resistance that might’ve saved them. The Lord does work in mysterious ways.

Sargon: Censorious social media

Un-personing is against human rights.

Digital Sine nomine.

They’re depriving a person of their livelihood, nowadays a social media presence is compulsory. They brought this about, they are duty bound to it. They serve US, all of us.

Terms and conditions do NOT apply above the state’s law and common law.

Terms and conditions are not legally binding documents until proven so. They are literally made up and “complied with” completely arbitrarily – not how real laws work.

These are ideological witch hunts.

300 years ago, they’d be accusing the prettiest woman in town of being a witch because she wouldn’t sleep with them.

comment

I would question the moral code of these social media companies especially YouTube. I flagged content made by a YouTuber encouraging adults to sleep with minors (named kun Tyra or something) and YouTube kept the content up without flagging the channel for child endangerment. Let seek out this union and because this behaviour stinks to high heaven.

It’s like how tumblr is a porn site but parents let their kids on it because the kids only show them sweet Disney cartoons. On Youtube, most channels are shilling and they aren’t legally required to disclose this. You want full power? You need full responsibility. No “mistakes were made”. I’ve flagged things as literally toxic – nobody cares!

They are guilty of treason by acting as judge, jury and executioner, terms and conditions are NOT “enforced” because they are not a government. Nobody knows who they are, they are biased and nobody can vote them in/out. They are acting beyond their authority.

Internet access is a human right, it was proven in an EU court.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/innovation-industry/news/broadband-internet-access-will-become-a-legal-right-under-new-eu-telecoms-rules/

and the UN agreed

https://www.wired.com/2011/06/internet-a-human-right/

As in, “de-platforming” online is illegal. Equivalent to banning someone from a public park (speaker’s corner)!

Monopoly laws must be applied.

The world’s noosphere isn’t run by middle-class post-grad America.

They are just a platform, the power is with the people.

They’re scared of him, which will make more people listen, the morons.

Streisand Effect?

aka why hardly anyone links to me.

The best way to win on this is to push the classist angle.

They are. They’re keeping the lower orders in line. It’s all about classist brainwashing.

This isn’t like kicking a gadfly from a college class. That’s also technically illegal since they pay for the class.

You’re a utility, you can’t turn down anyone for service.

My electric can’t switch it off because they dislike my opinions on ketchup.

My water company can’t stop because my musical taste sickens them.

They are there to provide service. To serve. Censorship is illegal. Nobody signs up to be censored.

Social media FANG-type stock would collapse tomorrow if they couldn’t illegally handle your data and get away with it. PM/DMs/Email are privileged communications. If you’re speaking about medical issues over DM or to your lawyer by email, it is breaking privacy law (the human right) to scan or read it. They’re opening your letters.

Judging, editing, copying and/or banning it is…super-illegal.

They’re a public service. The Post Office doesn’t approve you for sending mail.

They serve the public. The public > Them.

Do you really think this info just stays in the companies? They don’t talk, compile hit lists, gossip to their friends about this one user?

Google chokes citizen journalism

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/169387966

Monopoly law applies.

“does not serve more than 1000 results for any query”

If they can’t do search, their main job any more, why allow them to be a monopoly?

Others are reporting into to me on the irc, saying they are fine. Apparently there is a rumour Joogle is limiting results to IPs that browse 4chan/ pol/

Pretty sure that’s illegal.

http://www.businessinsider.com/un-says-internet-access-is-a-human-right-2016-7

They wouldn’t hypothetically list 25% of my posts, let alone anything important.

Insane times

Well, they had to make an example of him.

And I get the occasional SJW comment, taunting me about showing my face. Doing a podcast. Using other names.

More than one person has posted here, which they wouldn’t know of course. There is a fluid format.

This is a deliberately shitty blog that deliberately doesn’t advertise. That’s the point.

  1. that is not necessary on the internet, for the same reason announcing you’re going to a strip club to your boss doesn’t happen either. It’s none of their business. This isn’t Communist China, this would never have happened there.
  2. if a person cannot handle particular content, it is clearly labelled and easy to avoid. I make it hard to find this place, which spares me a lot of bullshit.
  3. it is a little like the fox, as they imagine themselves, taunting Little Red Riding Hood.
  4. most politics is a satire itself these days, making it difficult to tell who is actually joking and who is really that mad.
  5. I don’t like politics. Seriously, I just have to live around these people so they come up. I’d happily stop discussing these things if they found useful occupations.
  6. They love to come after anyone who looked at you for more than two seconds on the Tube, searching for abuse and public denouncements – friends, lovers, spouse, children, acquaintances, school chums, old teachers, that one guy from the pub you chatted with at 2am. It’s amazing the people they can pull out of their arse.
  7. It doesn’t end. They know this. They want to balance the books by evening the stats of “terrorist” by slandering political opponents. Previously, this caused Shy Tory syndrome (Labour of the 80s positions) but escalating to accusations of unpatriotic behaviour is especially vindictive. All they do is label you “far right” (there is no reason or definition to this, but they use it to mean Nazi when that cannot be historically accurate) and they can take your rights away. Thanks to a label. Less human. Oh, irony.
  8. Well, technically it will end when their money runs out. However, they make the most example out of women, by placing them into proximity to not-rapists. Them or their children.
  9. The twisting. I am bored and thinking of putting this piece on hiatus. Toyed with it a while.
  10. The Always Lie thing. Why try to impress a con artist with your sincerity, where you have it? They view it like a serial killer views a conscience, a pathetic weakness.

It reminds me of the stories of black people having drugs planted but with thoughtcrime.

This defamation isn’t a permanent state, already there is tension. They’ll pick on the wrong target eventually. On the other hand, a lot of it seems that way so until then, is a joke really worth your life, your safety and the happiness of loved ones, who may be elderly, ill, disabled, dependent or simply the shy, retiring type?

Well, that’s why we’re waiting until they run out of money. It’s like the non-engagement discussed before. Let them start spotting enemies where they don’t exist, they were going to witch hunt everyone eventually anyway.

And boy, are a lot of us pissed. The group of Not Them numbers in the double digit millions. I like those odds. Consider the desperation of doing this, a man who made a joke that wasn’t as bad as things televised by the BBC in the 90s. Their weakness is shown in going after people like this and it serves to expose them. This is turning more moderate people against them every time. They’re a small group of a few thousand individuals, tops.

There is a classist element in who they punish. It’s illegal to punch a working class person unless you call them White Van Man Neo-Nazi, nobody is allowed to question it but Labour didn’t get in. Politically they shit the bed and are loathe to lie in it.

Posted 2012, no arrests.

Yes, it’s a comedy. That’s our fucking point too.

How the Internet works

anonnofriends

Opacity is the entire point. Telling the truth requires a mask.

Also explains why SJWs keep failing, they can’t even see the enemy.

How do they think anything gets done?

Do they think it’s just one guy and he spins around in a chair like a Bond villian and it’s some weeaboo cuddling a Rainbow Dash plushie? Who do they think builds and maintains the internet? It doesn’t just happen.