The limits of tolerance

Posted on August 3, 2018 by disenchantedscholar

Wings don’t really exist anymore. Mostly, nobody cares about capitalism/socialism.

It’s all about the moral issues, the personal issues and what affects society. Social harm.

So it’s social harm against too much freedom (at what point can society curtail your damaging, antisocial expression, adult?)… the cult of individualism is dying and we could never afford it as a society/nation/race in the first place.

The libertarian who wants good roads and doesn’t want to pay for them.

“You don’t own me, but you owe me!” entitlement.

No.

And the cognitive dissonance applies elsewhere.

Plus the left wing says it’s beyond question. That is illiberal. They’re dogmatic because their foundational principles are being shown, empirically, to be entirely false and actually damaging the societies they’re in.

They refuse to admit.

Brexit 2nd vote?

Not our President?

Closed to reality.

IQ isn’t real but GPA is!

We need funding to teach IQ!

NURTURE IS ALWAYS TRUE. NATURE IS A LIE.

People can change but if they don’t want to it’s your fault. Don’t expect criminals to stop being criminals! Don’t apply our logic unless we say it’s okay! We love freedom of thought! We’re intellectuals!

Echo chambers of lies. Nice lies, killing you softly.

You don’t need to suffer, we’ll bail you out with free money if you sell us your soul.

The fake angel pouring poison in your ear. You didn’t sin, it was an accident, wasn’t it?

Learned helplessness, enabling destructiveness, pathological altruism – all abuse.

They can’t rule people unless they’re broken. Male and female. Poor and rich.

It intentionally reduces healthy independence and produces conflict by appealing to sin. Eat the apple, you deserve it. For every group. Everyone is weakened. Decadent rich, stupid poor, angry women, apathetic men.

By appealing to every group’s unique weakness, the chaos seems natural.

It isn’t.

Men are encouraged to sleep around and women are encouraged to hate their libido.

Insecurity in everybody.

The Left is even eating itself in a purity spiral, purity of delusion.

Virtue signalling insanity. Whoever can pretend the most insane bullshit will become utopia magically (magical thinking) wins. Spot it.

The blind optimists win.

trans. I can afford to ignore reality. Countersignal.

They create nothing so have no new solutions to their own problems, nobody to blame but don’t say they’re useless! The first time it went wrong didn’t count, try try again! Socialism has never been tried, guys!

You can’t argue with a moral relativist.

Literally.

There’s no evil to attack, they don’t see it.

They don’t really believe in laws because what enforcement? All feelings.

What about the victim’s feelings?

Where are the principles? Lowest immoral common denominator. Celebrated inferiority (below norm). Look how well we’re doing, we can afford this!

Like atheists arguing in bad faith about what God isn’t. You can’t prove a negative and they don’t believe in the positive concept they discuss – it’s all theory, wishy washy useless pontificating. It’s trolling, debate is impossible. They don’t care. They pretend to care.

Special plea: dehumanizing and ruining people’s lives is virtuous when we do it. Delusional hand of God, Angel of Death type reasoning. That is what all evil people believe.

They are deliberately blind to their own evil. They think they’re flawless based on what they eat.

>love everyone, positive thoughts! hate is bad!
>spends most weeks outrage posting on twitter

Age of Hypocrisy. Send in the pretentious clowns.

Send every stray African to rich California and London areas, only the liberal ones.
See how fast they complain. Holier than thou poor-haters.

I won’t rest until I see gypsies cover Hampstead Heath.

The tolerant Left takes up Inglourious cosplay

Posted on June 14, 2017 by disenchantedscholar

It was fiction.

I saw a random comment that said the Left see us as paper villains in their play where they’re the star, they don’t think we can think or react. Self-defense is still a law, especially for someone who purchased a weapon especially to beat you. The average fitness level of anti-fa is hilarious. They get winded after 1-3 flights of stairs.

An explanation for people who don’t bother with sports and hate themselves.

These people can’t play frisbee, they fumble and lack the hand-eye coordination, I seen it. I thought I was bad.
They can’t even play rounders, the older British baseball, played by children.
I have an old aluminium baseball bat somewhere, a lot of us have random sports equipment because we aren’t lazy fatarses – you know why I don’t use it? They’re hollow, they dent easier than a new sportscar. They’re useless. Aside from battery with a weapon at the very least, probably more like ABH or GBH with intent, serious prison time, a wooden baseball bat or ideally cricket bat is what any sporty chap would select. These people even fail at picking weapons. That’s just sad.

top comment
“You forgot the brown shirts to go with it, otherwise, how are you going to recognise who are the nazis who need beating and who are on your side?
Alternatively, you could force them to wear an armband with a swastika on it and tattoo a number on them?”

Boat shoes? Skater shoes? What in tar-nations is the traction on those things?

Tolerant Left memes and incitement to violence

Posted on May 1, 2017 by disenchantedscholar

Source: Sassy Socialist Memes

Muh Fascism! Because it’s only fascism when white working class people do it!

“We just want wealth taxes and to take away your physical right to self defense!”

uhuh

But concentration camp memes are so terrible?

The plan behind mass immigration, aside from the rape and murder angle.

It’s literally incitement of sedition, treason etc.

It’s a form of Cloward-Piven too.

“Everyone who disagrees with me is a FASCIST!”

What was Nazi short for again? I mean, these people do want to reform the NATION state.

Marxists don’t have right-wing friends.

Actually, yeah, fuck him. Ban guns for his own people but sell them abroad?

They have a gigantic priggish chip on their shoulder with everyone, but they can’t throw a punch and they don’t expect people to defend themselves from physical assault?

Is the joke that nobody asks?

They’re not even denying it anymore.

Outright endorsement of murder. No wonder they like terrorists.

Has anyone seen a Marxist who was actually a worker? Like, a blue-collar one?

Marxist logic: inciting violence against anyone who disagrees with them, anyone disagreeing with them wants to incite violence if you disagree with them

Communism fails because labour isn’t equally valuable. And when they say everyone should work, what about the disabled? Where are they? And then, what about the hours worked? If a worker chooses to be more productive over the rest? Finally, how does that alter the IQ bell curve whatsoever? Men need more calories than women, but under Communism they’d only be allowed the female ration. That’s all Communist is, dressed up rations and slave labour. If getting rich were easy these people would’ve done it already.
None of them want to set up a commune, a real, actual commune that makes everything from scratch – that’s Amish. How does it change the fact that some people are totally lazy? What happens to them? What about the worker’s right to refuse the state? Morally, none of this works, and you can tell nobody involved in these theories even worked in a factory because workers refuse things all the time. Humans compete too, that’s the nature argument. It’s Darwin? So what do you do about the competitive workers? Since reducing their labour would be unlikely, stealing their labour against their will is exactly what capitalists do, according to them. What about engineers building the technology, they’d own it, as their labour! If they exchange it or merely the surplus, is that not capitalism? What if 51% of the population don’t want Communism? Don’t they have a right to revolt against their oppressors? Otherwise it’s fascist, isn’t it? Not to mention, some cultures can’t handle systems that probably rely on altruism genetics.
Imagine MENA. Picture it. Finally, how is calling someone a class traitor realistically different than calling them a race traitor?

For someone to win, another person has to lose. Welcome to adulthood.

I don’t see these college morons backing the idea of banning grades, since that’s unequal.

“Shut up, bigot!” The intolerance of ‘tolerance’

Posted on August 23, 2015 by disenchantedscholar

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/shut-up-bigot-the-intolerance-of-tolerance

…Where does the charge of bigotry come from? Is it just a passing fad, a political and social tool for power and control, or do its roots go deeper?

HERETIC! BLASPHEMY! SINNER!
#ahem#

Bigotry is defined as“intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.” Notice that bigotry is not intolerance toward the opinions or beliefs of persons other than yourself, but intolerance of the other person. Bigotry is not simply disagreeing with what someone else believes; it is an unwillingness to tolerate or accept the person who holds those beliefs.

No-platforming and other forms of human rights oppression.

A little reflection on this definition will reveal that the vast majority of bigotry accusations populating the internet and in public discourse are not legitimate ones. On the contrary, they are the consequence of a mistaken view of tolerance that is itself a product of a warped postmodern epistemology….